Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > Joe G.'s Tardgasm

Pages: (919) < ... 476 477 478 479 480 [481] 482 483 484 485 486 ... >

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,10:46    Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,18:40) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,10:18) Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,10:16)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,10:11)     Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,10:08)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,09:44)         Quote (k.e.. @ April 13 2018,09:41)           Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,17:37)           Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,09:34)             Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,09:33)             Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,09:32)               Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,09:31)               Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,09:29)                   Quote can use evolutionary processes to produce bears from non-bears, tigers from non-tigers, manatees from non-manatees but is too incompetent to evolve humans from non-humans. Your cowardly equivocation is duly noted. And who said anything about bears from non-bears, manatees from non-manatees- How did grizzly bears and manatees get here Joke? Not by means of natural selection and drift. Evolutionism had nothing to do with it You dodged the question Joke. How did grizzly bears and manatees get here? All you do is dodge questions so shut the fuck up. What is this alleged known mechanism? Why doesn't Theobald talk about it in his evidences for macro-evolution? Why isn't it discussed in PubMed? Why is it absent from Futuyma's textbook on Evolution? You dodged the question again Joke.   Don't worry, it's not a salad, no need to dodge. How did grizzly bears and manatees get here? Could have been Uber.... do they have that where Joe lives. Hillbilly Uber? You hollar over to maws and she gets bubba to chase the chickens off of the ride on lawn mower. Pretty sad Joke claims to be an ID-Creationist expert yet can't answer the simplest of questions. Joke tells us what supposedly didn't happen (evolution) but he won't tell us what did happen. How did grizzly bears and manatees get here? Again, fuck you. I said it couldn't happen via natural selection and drift. You don't even have a mechanism capable of producing eukaryotes That means it had to have happened via some telic process. What telic process was that Joe? Engineering That doesn't provide a process Joke.  Be specific.  Show us why ID-Creationism's process is a better answer than evolution's process No, dumbass. YOUR position is the one that makes the claim of "numerous, successive, slight, modifications. ID doesn't make such a claim so it doesn't have to defend it. ID's methodology is in the determination of design from nature, operating freely. Warning goal post moving ahead, prepare for frequent stoppages, your journey may take longer than expected. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,10:46    What is this alleged known mechanism that can produce a human from a non-human? Why doesn't Theobald talk about it in his evidences for macro-evolution? Why isn't it discussed in PubMed? Why is it absent from Futuyma's textbook on Evolution? -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,10:47    Quote (k.e.. @ April 13 2018,10:46) Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,18:40) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,10:18)   Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,10:16)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,10:11)       Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,10:08)         Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,09:44)         Quote (k.e.. @ April 13 2018,09:41)           Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,17:37)             Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,09:34)             Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,09:33)               Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,09:32)               Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,09:31)                 Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,09:29)                   Quote can use evolutionary processes to produce bears from non-bears, tigers from non-tigers, manatees from non-manatees but is too incompetent to evolve humans from non-humans. Your cowardly equivocation is duly noted. And who said anything about bears from non-bears, manatees from non-manatees- How did grizzly bears and manatees get here Joke? Not by means of natural selection and drift. Evolutionism had nothing to do with it You dodged the question Joke. How did grizzly bears and manatees get here? All you do is dodge questions so shut the fuck up. What is this alleged known mechanism? Why doesn't Theobald talk about it in his evidences for macro-evolution? Why isn't it discussed in PubMed? Why is it absent from Futuyma's textbook on Evolution? You dodged the question again Joke.   Don't worry, it's not a salad, no need to dodge. How did grizzly bears and manatees get here? Could have been Uber.... do they have that where Joe lives. Hillbilly Uber? You hollar over to maws and she gets bubba to chase the chickens off of the ride on lawn mower. Pretty sad Joke claims to be an ID-Creationist expert yet can't answer the simplest of questions. Joke tells us what supposedly didn't happen (evolution) but he won't tell us what did happen. How did grizzly bears and manatees get here? Again, fuck you. I said it couldn't happen via natural selection and drift. You don't even have a mechanism capable of producing eukaryotes That means it had to have happened via some telic process. What telic process was that Joe? Engineering That doesn't provide a process Joke.  Be specific.  Show us why ID-Creationism's process is a better answer than evolution's process No, dumbass. YOUR position is the one that makes the claim of "numerous, successive, slight, modifications. ID doesn't make such a claim so it doesn't have to defend it. ID's methodology is in the determination of design from nature, operating freely. Warning goal post moving ahead, prepare for frequent stoppages, your journey may take longer than expected. Your ignorance is not an argument. You are still too much of a coward to actually make a coherent response- -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,10:48    Yes the goal posts were moved back to where they belong -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,10:53    Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,18:44)   Quote Show us why ID's process is a better answer than evolutionism's process Well you have to show that you have a process that is capable of building things and not just breaking them. GA's exemplify the power of evolution by means of intelligent design. You still have nothing but lies, bluffs, equivocations and whining. Show us Joe's the royal we why ID's process is a better answer than evolutionism's  process Well you have to show  that that Joe   you doesn't have a process that is capable of building things and not just breaking them. GA's exemplify the power of evolution by means of intelligent design Natural Selection You Joe still have nothing but lies, bluffs, equivocations and whining.[CODE] -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,11:00    Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,18:48) Yes the goal posts were moved back to where they belong -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,11:05    Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,10:44) Quote Show us why ID's process is a better answer than evolutionism's process Well you have to show that you have a process that is capable of building things and not just breaking them. GA's exemplify the power of evolution by means of intelligent design. You still have nothing but lies, bluffs, equivocations and whining. Yawn.  Another day of chickenshit Joke running his mouth, then running from all questions about his ID-Creationist claims. Ho-hum. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,11:06    Quote (k.e.. @ April 13 2018,10:53) Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,18:44)     Quote Show us why ID's process is a better answer than evolutionism's process Well you have to show that you have a process that is capable of building things and not just breaking them. GA's exemplify the power of evolution by means of intelligent design. You still have nothing but lies, bluffs, equivocations and whining. Show us Joe's the royal we why ID's process is a better answer than evolutionism's  process Well you have to show  that that Joe   you doesn't have a process that is capable of building things and not just breaking them. GA's exemplify the power of evolution by means of intelligent design Natural Selection You Joe still have nothing but lies, bluffs, equivocations and whining.[CODE] Well you have to show that you have a process that is capable of building things and not just breaking them. GA's exemplify the power of evolution by means of intelligent design. You still have nothing but lies, bluffs, equivocations and whining. ke learns about natural selection from reading computer programmers and ignores what the experts in evolutionary biology say about it. That takes a special kind of pathetic to ignore what your high priests have to say -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,11:06    Can somebody help the evoTARDS?  They seem unable to answer a simple questions. What is this alleged known mechanism that can produce a human from a non-human? Why doesn't Theobald talk about it in his evidences for macro-evolution? Why isn't it discussed in PubMed? Why is it absent from Futuyma's textbook on Evolution? Answer those questions or admit that you are shitting your diaper -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,11:10    Yes the goal posts were moved back to where they belong Evolutionism is the position that makes the claim of "numerous, slight, successive modifications". ID does not make such a claim so clearly it doesn't have to defend it. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,11:11    Yawn.  Another day of chickenshit Joke running his mouth, then running from all questions about his ID-Creationist claims. Ho-hum. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

fnxtr Posts: 3504 Joined: June 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,11:15    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,07:31)   Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,09:29)     Quote can use evolutionary processes to produce bears from non-bears, tigers from non-tigers, manatees from non-manatees but is too incompetent to evolve humans from non-humans. Your cowardly equivocation is duly noted. And who said anything about bears from non-bears, manatees from non-manatees- How did grizzly bears and manatees get here Joke? "Poof!" [Behe, M., "Confessions of a drunken pseudo-scientist"] -------------- "[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory "Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,11:16    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,11:11) Yawn.  Another day of chickenshit Joke running his mouth, then running from all questions about his ID-Creationist claims. Ho-hum. That is what you, a pathetic liar and coward have to say, anyway. But you run away from everything -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,11:17    Quote (fnxtr @ April 13 2018,11:15) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,07:31)   Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,09:29)       Quote can use evolutionary processes to produce bears from non-bears, tigers from non-tigers, manatees from non-manatees but is too incompetent to evolve humans from non-humans. Your cowardly equivocation is duly noted. And who said anything about bears from non-bears, manatees from non-manatees- How did grizzly bears and manatees get here Joke? "Poof!" [Behe, M., "Confessions of a drunken pseudo-scientist"] poof is all you have, dumbass. You're still stuck at populations of prokaryotes -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,11:17    Can somebody help the evoTARDS?  They seem unable to answer a simple questions. What is this alleged known mechanism that can produce a human from a non-human? Why doesn't Theobald talk about it in his evidences for macro-evolution? Why isn't it discussed in PubMed? Why is it absent from Futuyma's textbook on Evolution? Answer those questions or admit that you are shitting your diaper -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,11:26    Yawn.  Another day of chickenshit Joke running his mouth, then running from all questions about his ID-Creationist claims. Ho-hum. Joke hard at work explaining ID-Creationism.   -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Henry J Posts: 5786 Joined: Mar. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,11:36    Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ April 13 2018,08:05) Quote (Joe G @ April 12 2018,20:29) Quote (Henry J @ April 12 2018,19:27) So who or what designed di-hydrogen monoxide? Walt Disney maybe? (i.e., what does a diagram of an H2O molecule look like) The Designer of the universe. What else is there? Water just happened to luck into an almost perfect universal solvent? How many solids are less dense than their liquid form? How many solids could float on their liquid form- in great big chunks? I am sure the fish are happy that lakes don't freeze from the bottom up. silicon, gallium, germanium, antimony, bismuth, plutonium, bismuth, acetic acid. Really? That many? Not that it really matters, since life on this planet is adapted to what is.

Henry J Posts: 5786 Joined: Mar. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,11:41    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,08:39) Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,09:38) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,09:37)   Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,09:34)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,09:33)     Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,09:32)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 13 2018,09:31)       Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,09:29)         Quote can use evolutionary processes to produce bears from non-bears, tigers from non-tigers, manatees from non-manatees but is too incompetent to evolve humans from non-humans. Your cowardly equivocation is duly noted. And who said anything about bears from non-bears, manatees from non-manatees- How did grizzly bears and manatees get here Joke? Not by means of natural selection and drift. Evolutionism had nothing to do with it You dodged the question Joke. How did grizzly bears and manatees get here? All you do is dodge questions so shut the fuck up. What is this alleged known mechanism? Why doesn't Theobald talk about it in his evidences for macro-evolution? Why isn't it discussed in PubMed? Why is it absent from Futuyma's textbook on Evolution? You dodged the question again Joke.   Don't worry, it's not a salad, no need to dodge. How did grizzly bears and manatees get here? Yes, all you do is dodge questions: What is this alleged known mechanism? Why doesn't Theobald talk about it in his evidences for macro-evolution? Why isn't it discussed in PubMed? Why is it absent from Futuyma's textbook on Evolution? Answer those questions or admit that you are shitting your diaper Can somebody help Joke?  He seems unable to answer a simple question. How did grizzly bears and manatees get here? If they used the same method, they swam. Although the bear could have walked if there was a land route.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,11:44    Can somebody help the evoTARDS?  They seem unable to answer a simple questions. What is this alleged known mechanism that can produce a human from a non-human? Why doesn't Theobald talk about it in his evidences for macro-evolution? Why isn't it discussed in PubMed? Why is it absent from Futuyma's textbook on Evolution? Answer those questions or admit that you are shitting your diaper -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,11:55    Quote (ChemiCat @ April 13 2018,08:36) Iv'e had an idea for a comedy show. Working title; "The Big Dumb Theory" Starring Gaulin in a shared apartment with Joke Galien and R Byers. Would you watch it? We would be discussing evolutionism. The entire show would revolve around the ignorant stupidity of evolutionism -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Richardthughes Posts: 11178 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,13:28    Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,11:55) Quote (ChemiCat @ April 13 2018,08:36) Iv'e had an idea for a comedy show. Working title; "The Big Dumb Theory" Starring Gaulin in a shared apartment with Joke Galien and R Byers. Would you watch it? We would be discussing evolutionism. The entire show would revolve around the ignorant stupidity of evolutionism Please make and put on YouTube. Thanks. -------------- "Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield "You magnificent bastard! " : Louis "ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard "I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932 "...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

Texas Teach Posts: 2084 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,16:15    Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,09:11) Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ April 13 2018,09:05) Quote (Joe G @ April 12 2018,20:29)   Quote (Henry J @ April 12 2018,19:27) So who or what designed di-hydrogen monoxide? Walt Disney maybe? (i.e., what does a diagram of an H2O molecule look like) The Designer of the universe. What else is there? Water just happened to luck into an almost perfect universal solvent? How many solids are less dense than their liquid form? How many solids could float on their liquid form- in great big chunks? I am sure the fish are happy that lakes don't freeze from the bottom up. silicon, gallium, germanium, antimony, bismuth, plutonium, bismuth, acetic acid. bismuth twice- really? How many on that list fit the second question and how many are solvents? Quote How many on that list fit the second question All of them.  Anyone want to explain to Joe why his question shows how little he knows about chemistry? Quote and how many are solvents? All of them.  Anyone want to explain to Joe why his question shows how little he knows about chemistry? (Before Joe tries to play word games, he should note that he didn’t specify they had to be more “universal” solvents than water) -------------- "Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr "I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

Henry J Posts: 5786 Joined: Mar. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,16:31    But how many of them are liquid at room temperature?

JohnW Posts: 3217 Joined: Aug. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,16:43    Quote (Henry J @ April 13 2018,14:31) But how many of them are liquid at room temperature?  :p All of them, depending on the room. -------------- Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

Henry J Posts: 5786 Joined: Mar. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,16:47    Quote (JohnW @ April 13 2018,15:43) Quote (Henry J @ April 13 2018,14:31) But how many of them are liquid at room temperature?  :p All of them, depending on the room. I guess it is a matter of degree, at that.

Texas Teach Posts: 2084 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,16:47    Quote (JohnW @ April 13 2018,16:43) Quote (Henry J @ April 13 2018,14:31) But how many of them are liquid at room temperature?  :p All of them, depending on the room. But if you’re in a room with liquid plutonium, you’re gonna have a bad time. -------------- "Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr "I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

stevestory Posts: 13407 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,16:49    Quote (Texas Teach @ April 13 2018,17:15) Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,09:11) Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ April 13 2018,09:05)   Quote (Joe G @ April 12 2018,20:29)   Quote (Henry J @ April 12 2018,19:27) So who or what designed di-hydrogen monoxide? Walt Disney maybe? (i.e., what does a diagram of an H2O molecule look like) The Designer of the universe. What else is there? Water just happened to luck into an almost perfect universal solvent? How many solids are less dense than their liquid form? How many solids could float on their liquid form- in great big chunks? I am sure the fish are happy that lakes don't freeze from the bottom up. silicon, gallium, germanium, antimony, bismuth, plutonium, bismuth, acetic acid. bismuth twice- really? How many on that list fit the second question and how many are solvents? Quote How many on that list fit the second question All of them.  Anyone want to explain to Joe why his question shows how little he knows about chemistry? Quote and how many are solvents? All of them.  Anyone want to explain to Joe why his question shows how little he knows about chemistry? (Before Joe tries to play word games, he should note that he didn’t specify they had to be more “universal” solvents than water) "But how many of them are also... ...ugh...whew... ...gimme a minute, these goalposts are heavy..."

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,16:57    Quote (Texas Teach @ April 13 2018,16:15) Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,09:11) Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ April 13 2018,09:05)   Quote (Joe G @ April 12 2018,20:29)   Quote (Henry J @ April 12 2018,19:27) So who or what designed di-hydrogen monoxide? Walt Disney maybe? (i.e., what does a diagram of an H2O molecule look like) The Designer of the universe. What else is there? Water just happened to luck into an almost perfect universal solvent? How many solids are less dense than their liquid form? How many solids could float on their liquid form- in great big chunks? I am sure the fish are happy that lakes don't freeze from the bottom up. silicon, gallium, germanium, antimony, bismuth, plutonium, bismuth, acetic acid. bismuth twice- really? How many on that list fit the second question and how many are solvents? Quote How many on that list fit the second question All of them.  Anyone want to explain to Joe why his question shows how little he knows about chemistry? Quote and how many are solvents? All of them.  Anyone want to explain to Joe why his question shows how little he knows about chemistry? (Before Joe tries to play word games, he should note that he didn’t specify they had to be more “universal” solvents than water) Does silicon come in a liquid? Really? Or is it changed, chemically by solvents to become a liquid? -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Acartia_Bogart Posts: 2927 Joined: Sep. 2014 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,17:11    Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,16:57) Quote (Texas Teach @ April 13 2018,16:15) Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,09:11)   Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ April 13 2018,09:05)   Quote (Joe G @ April 12 2018,20:29)     Quote (Henry J @ April 12 2018,19:27) So who or what designed di-hydrogen monoxide? Walt Disney maybe? (i.e., what does a diagram of an H2O molecule look like) The Designer of the universe. What else is there? Water just happened to luck into an almost perfect universal solvent? How many solids are less dense than their liquid form? How many solids could float on their liquid form- in great big chunks? I am sure the fish are happy that lakes don't freeze from the bottom up. silicon, gallium, germanium, antimony, bismuth, plutonium, bismuth, acetic acid. bismuth twice- really? How many on that list fit the second question and how many are solvents?   Quote How many on that list fit the second question All of them.  Anyone want to explain to Joe why his question shows how little he knows about chemistry?   Quote and how many are solvents? All of them.  Anyone want to explain to Joe why his question shows how little he knows about chemistry? (Before Joe tries to play word games, he should note that he didn’t specify they had to be more “universal” solvents than water) Does silicon come in a liquid? Really? Or is it changed, chemically by solvents to become a liquid? Pardon the language but, what the fuck?

Texas Teach Posts: 2084 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 13 2018,17:28    Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ April 13 2018,17:11) Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,16:57) Quote (Texas Teach @ April 13 2018,16:15)   Quote (Joe G @ April 13 2018,09:11)   Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ April 13 2018,09:05)     Quote (Joe G @ April 12 2018,20:29)     Quote (Henry J @ April 12 2018,19:27) So who or what designed di-hydrogen monoxide? Walt Disney maybe? (i.e., what does a diagram of an H2O molecule look like) The Designer of the universe. What else is there? Water just happened to luck into an almost perfect universal solvent? How many solids are less dense than their liquid form? How many solids could float on their liquid form- in great big chunks? I am sure the fish are happy that lakes don't freeze from the bottom up. silicon, gallium, germanium, antimony, bismuth, plutonium, bismuth, acetic acid. bismuth twice- really? How many on that list fit the second question and how many are solvents?   Quote How many on that list fit the second question All of them.  Anyone want to explain to Joe why his question shows how little he knows about chemistry?   Quote and how many are solvents? All of them.  Anyone want to explain to Joe why his question shows how little he knows about chemistry? (Before Joe tries to play word games, he should note that he didn’t specify they had to be more “universal” solvents than water) Does silicon come in a liquid? Really? Or is it changed, chemically by solvents to become a liquid? Pardon the language but, what the fuck? [Teacher mode] I believe Joe, like many lay people is confusing silicone (the compound) and silicon (the element).  Silicone is, apparently, available is a liquid form, but this is a bit confusing as “silicone” is a name used for a variety of polymers.  We were talking about silicon, which melts (just like ice does) to be a liquid, albeit at 2577 F.  Unlike the various states of water, most substances are given the same name as a solid, liquid, or gas. [/teacher mode] -------------- "Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr "I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

Pages: (919) < ... 476 477 478 479 480 [481] 482 483 484 485 486 ... >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard