Joe G
Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007
|
Quote (k.e.. @ May 02 2018,12:37) | Quote (Joe G @ May 02 2018,20:25) | Quote (k.e.. @ May 02 2018,12:16) | Quote (Joe G @ May 02 2018,20:11) | Quote (k.e.. @ May 02 2018,12:08) | Quote (Joe G @ May 02 2018,19:52) | Quote (k.e.. @ May 02 2018,11:47) | Quote (Joe G @ May 02 2018,19:26) | Quote (k.e.. @ May 02 2018,11:03) | Quote (Joe G @ May 02 2018,18:47) | Quote | A central tenet of modern science is methodological naturalism—it seeks to explain the universe purely in terms of observed or testable natural mechanisms. |
Intelligent design is an observed and testable natural mechanism. Cars are not made by magic or supernatural processes. |
There isn't a scientific theory of creationism.
It has never been observed and has no testable natural mechanism.
Life is not made by magic or supernatural processes.
If anyone disagrees then it is up them to link to it, tell us who the author was, when it was published and what journal it was published in.
If you cannot do that then it is clear that I am right.
Thank you - still waiting |
Intelligent design is a testable mechanism.
It is observed every day
ID does not need magic nor the supernatural.
And I never claimed there was a scientific theory of Design. |
Correct!..... go to the top of the religion class Joe.
Now roll your sleeves up so you can't pull anything out from them and tell us how you observe and test design ...er or how god didit. <snickker> |
What? ID doesn't have anything to do with religion, asshole.
Your position is the one that requires faith.
I have already posted how to test ID. You choked on it. So now it is up to you to show how your position does it so we can compare |
Creationism/ID is not religious???
Quote | The good news is that in 2005 the landmark legal case Kitzmiller v. Doverin Harrisburg, Pa., set binding precedent that the teaching of intelligent design in U.S. public schools is unconstitutional because the idea is fundamentally religious, not scientific. |
Only relgion requires faith Joe.
Quote | I have already posted how to test ID |
Humor us Joe ....we all need a good laugh. |
ID is not religious. ID doesn't say anything about who, how nor when to worship. ID is based on science and evidence.
Your position requires faith because no one can test its claims.
And you post how to test the claims of your position. That way you cannot just dismiss what ID has which is much more than you can posit |
Take that up in court Joe....
Oh that's right Behe, Dembski and the DiscoTute all ran away and didn't appeal.
Now it's L.A.W.
Just try teaching your pathetic shit in a schools Joe.
...oh that's right you don't have an education.
So no chance of that happening right Joe?
And still no test for ID.... |
Strange that IDists has posited the methodology to test the claims of ID. Your willful ignorance is just that, ke.
Your pathetic shit is being taught in schools. And all someone has to do is ask the teacher how to test it and all hell will break loose because the teacher won't have a fucking clue. |
Keep those laughs coming Joe.
What's your test again???
Prayers? |
What's your test, ke? Attack everyone?
-------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth
"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton
Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code- Acartia bogart, TARD
YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism
|