RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < ... 896 897 898 899 900 [901] 902 903 904 905 906 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Zarquon



Posts: 71
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 16 2008,17:46   

27000 = 3 x 3 x 3 x1000 = Trinity**3 * 1000

I'm holier than thou!

  
rhmc



Posts: 340
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: April 16 2008,19:23   

Quote (Louis @ April 16 2008,14:35)
Dear Dr Hughes,

Is you positing by that use of an obscure colloquialism that several members of Teh FundaMENTAList Cohomounity are closet crosswind skiers? Are you saying that they occasionally enjoy a little marmite mining? Choccy stabbing? Fudge packing? Bum banditry? Pooper nicking? Starfish slamming? Brown hatting? Poo pushing? And cetera.

If so I would like to take issue with your homophobic comments and deeply offensive remarks about a group of gentlemen who just occasionally like to smoke a little hot man sausage despite their loud, religious proclamations to the contrary. Please refer to them using the only suitable piece of terminology henceforth, or even hencefifth: lying, hypocritical, sanctimonious, cock gobbling arse pirates.

Thank you.

Yours in brotherly love

Reverand Arthur Pinkerton "Whoops there go my trousers officer, I has a wide stance" Smythe,
"The Cottage"
Public Toilet on Great Compton Street
London

jeebus.

  
rhmc



Posts: 340
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: April 16 2008,19:25   

sigh.  

what i meant to comment on was:

marmite mining?

i've heard of drilling for mudbunnies but what is a marmite?

marmots, yes.  marmites?

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: April 16 2008,19:31   

Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ April 16 2008,16:05)
Father O'DaveTard:
 
Quote
It’s morally wrong to make good people feel bad about themselves. What’s your goal with all this? To make thousands of good Christian scientists feel guilty about doing what they must to provide for their families? That sucks. Big time. Try a little understanding and forgiveness instead. Isn’t that part of your Christian calling?

He forgot his usual "fuck you and the horse you rode in on."

Bwhahahahahahaha monster projection by dTard.

Morally wrong = ?

good people = ?

feel bad = ?

good Christian = ?

Scientist = ?

guilty = ?

families = ?



Politeness theory

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
Rubberchicken



Posts: 7
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: April 16 2008,20:20   

Quote (rhmc @ April 17 2008,05:25)
sigh.  


i've heard of drilling for mudbunnies but what is a marmite?

marmots, yes.  marmites?


Here you go.
http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/marmite.htm

Vegemite is better than marmite, it is a similar product.

http://www.vegemite.com.au/vegemit....Ref=647

Let us not forget chutney ferret or shirt lifter either.

  
Quidam



Posts: 229
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: April 16 2008,20:55   

Quote
Vegemite is better than marmite,
Yeah and Fosters is better than horse piss, but not much.

Bloody colonials... mutter

--------------
The organized fossils ... and their localities also, may be understood by all, even the most illiterate. William Smith, Strata. 1816

  
Dr.GH



Posts: 2333
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: April 16 2008,22:41   

Quote (Quidam @ April 16 2008,18:55)
 
Quote
Vegemite is better than marmite,
Yeah and Fosters is better than horse piss, but not much.

Bloody colonials... mutter

I am afraid I have never drunk horse piss, so I fail to grasp the comparison.

There was one wine review I read for "Alabama Wild Mountain Gape Wine."  It said,  
Quote
When this wine was submited to the State Agricultural Board for analysis, the grower received the following letter,

"Dear Sirs,

We regrets to inform you yer Mule has got that diebeties."


--------------
"Science is the horse that pulls the cart of philosophy."

L. Susskind, 2004 "SMOLIN VS. SUSSKIND: THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE"

   
Rubberchicken



Posts: 7
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: April 16 2008,22:58   

Quote (Quidam @ April 17 2008,06:55)
Quote
Vegemite is better than marmite,
Yeah and Fosters is better than horse piss, but not much.

Bloody colonials... mutter

Sorry old boy but I drink real beer. Generally ales and stout.

I would stick with the horse piss and forget the fosters.

  
1of63



Posts: 126
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: April 16 2008,23:00   

Quote (Rubberchicken @ April 16 2008,20:20)
Quote (rhmc @ April 17 2008,05:25)
sigh.  


i've heard of drilling for mudbunnies but what is a marmite?

marmots, yes.  marmites?


Here you go.
http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/marmite.htm

Vegemite is better than marmite, it is a similar product.

http://www.vegemite.com.au/vegemit....Ref=647

Let us not forget chutney ferret or shirt lifter either.

Quote
Vegemite is better than marmite, it is a similar product.

Crap.  Vegemite is but a feeble imitation of Marmite.

As for Fosters (or Bud or Coors) it's hard to tell whether it's cat's or gnat's...

--------------
I set expectations at zero, and FL limbos right under them. - Tracy P. Hamilton

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,00:02   

warm budweiser is better than a host of t'others.

what do i care, i found 34 fish today.  fuck youns.  i drank warm budweiser while i did it.

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,00:43   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ April 17 2008,00:02)
warm budweiser is better than a host of t'others.

what do i care, i found 34 fish today.  fuck youns.  i drank warm budweiser while i did it.

My heart goes out to you....have you considered suicide?

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,01:04   

Quote (Richardthughes @ April 16 2008,15:58)
DaveTard gets snarky with one of UD's 4 advertisers..

http://www.uncommondescent.com/expelle....-240610

Dr. Dr. Bill gets snarky too.
Quote
Gerry: Watch the religious moralizing — I have very little patience for it. I know the case in question, and it is a matter of getting the ID research done in a hostile environment.


And Gerry Rzeppa gets a little snarky right back:    
Quote
As a Christian his job is to make disciples of all nations, love his wife, his kids, fellow believers, neighbors, etc. It’s certainly not his responsibility to take up a career that requires frequent and sustained lying to assist the secular government in the management of the unregenerate.

And ditto for frequent and sustained lying to advance a fraudulent pseudo-science.

  
didymos



Posts: 1828
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,01:22   

Quote (CeilingCat @ April 16 2008,23:04)

And Gerry Rzeppa gets a little snarky right back:            
Quote
As a Christian his job is to make disciples of all nations, love his wife, his kids, fellow believers, neighbors, etc. It’s certainly not his responsibility to take up a career that requires frequent and sustained lying to assist the secular government in the management of the unregenerate.

And ditto for frequent and sustained lying to advance a fraudulent pseudo-science.

What I like about it is it's discussing the morality of undercover police investigation. So, No True Christian can/should be an undercover officer.  OK, so what about non-Christians undercover, Gerry?

   
Quote

And if he’s not a Christian, the only advice I have for him is to become one.


Well, crap, there's something else we'll have to outsource until all the now-no-longer-undercover cops quit and assume their true Christian duty to "make disciples of all nations".  After that's done, we're just fucked I guess.

--------------
I wouldn't be bothered reading about the selfish gene because it has never been identified. -- Denyse O'Leary, professional moron
Again "how much". I don't think that's a good way to be quantitative.-- gpuccio

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,01:36   

Quote
As a Christian his job is to make disciples of all nations, love his wife, his kids, fellow believers, neighbors, etc.


.....And love ex male prostitutes who supply xtal meth, to put a little extra zing in the "love thy neighbor" bit.

.....Put another prophylactic on the prothelizer and let the good times roll! Yeah Baby!!!

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
didymos



Posts: 1828
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,03:16   

From the same thread as the last few, we discover that, hey it's all ID research! sagebrush gardener explains:
 
Quote

But if ID is true, then all research is ID-related and no competent, honest researcher can help discovering evidence for design. The only question is whether the researcher admits it or not. The famous XVIVO animation for example clearly supports design for anyone with eyes to see.

The laboratory does not need to say “ID Research Department” on the door. I don’t see why someone whose eyes are open to design can’t work (”undercover” if necessary) alongside design-deniers and let the results speak for themselves.


But sagey, pal, it's the Darwinianist Forces of Darkness who will, if given the opportunity, put you in a concentration camp should you dare to suggest it's the work of God The Ecumenically Acceptable Designer. Don't you see the evidence for that, man!? It's all around you! Did you hear that? Oh God Ecumenically Acceptable Designer! They're here......

Or you know, not.

--------------
I wouldn't be bothered reading about the selfish gene because it has never been identified. -- Denyse O'Leary, professional moron
Again "how much". I don't think that's a good way to be quantitative.-- gpuccio

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,03:54   

Quote (rhmc @ April 17 2008,01:25)
sigh.  

what i meant to comment on was:

marmite mining?

i've heard of drilling for mudbunnies but what is a marmite?

marmots, yes.  marmites?

Marmite is a UK brand of savoury yeast extract, rather like Vegemite, that one can spread on bread (or a lover) and eat. It is brownish, sticky and smelly.

Does that help?

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,03:56   

Quote (Quidam @ April 17 2008,02:55)
Quote
Vegemite is better than marmite,
Yeah and Fosters is better than horse piss, but not much.

Bloody colonials... mutter

I disagree most strongly. Why only the other day I was drinking horse piss and it was vastly superior to the Amber Urine. It also had a marvellous head on it that could only be removed from one's top lip with turpentine.

Has anyone done the "making love in a canoe" joke yet?

Louis

P.S. Vegemite is better than marmite? NEVER! Such heresy must not be allowed. BURN THE HERETIC!

--------------
Bye.

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,04:05   

Quote (Rubberchicken @ April 17 2008,02:20)
Quote (rhmc @ April 17 2008,05:25)
sigh.  


i've heard of drilling for mudbunnies but what is a marmite?

marmots, yes.  marmites?


Here you go.
http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/marmite.htm

Vegemite is better than marmite, it is a similar product.

http://www.vegemite.com.au/vegemit....Ref=647

Let us not forget chutney ferret or shirt lifter either.

Oh absolutely. When expressing terms of bigotted endearment for our homosexualist cousins (God love 'em. Unless you're Fred Phelps of course) one must aim for a diversity of terminology I've always said.

Chutney ferret is a personal favourite, as is it's more UK centric derivation the Branston Warbler.

Louis

P.S. It's actually the terminology that amuses me, not the bigotry. Bigotry = bad, euphamisms = funny.

--------------
Bye.

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,06:23   

Going to the movies tomorrow?  I am.  I'm going to buy a ticket to "Leatherheads", but I just might accidently veer into the wrong theater and see "Expelled".

Just in case, I've printed some of these up:

Want more information on Darwin and Hitler?
www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/paul_23_4.html
www.expelledexposed.com/

(I also include the http:whack whack, but left it off here because the blog software goes ape and destroys the formatting.)

If you use 8 point type and print them two across, you can fit 30 of them on an 8 x 10 sheet of paper.  I plan to scatter them like confetti.  

Do check out the secularhumanism url.  It's an eye-opener for just about everybody.  Show it to your Christian friends.  And does anybody have any suggestions for other URLs to add?

And now I'm off to Kinkos to use their paper cutter.

  
didymos



Posts: 1828
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,06:32   

I only see one problem with the idea, and that is that to a lot of Christians "Secular Humanism" is basically identical to "Satanism".  I think for some, it'd actually be better to be an honest-to-God Satanist than a Secular Humanist.

--------------
I wouldn't be bothered reading about the selfish gene because it has never been identified. -- Denyse O'Leary, professional moron
Again "how much". I don't think that's a good way to be quantitative.-- gpuccio

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,06:37   

I hadn't said much about it, as there was no indication it would be playing here, but I see that it is indeed opening on Friday.

I'll pay for the movie, and write it off as a donation to the XVIVO folks.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Annyday



Posts: 583
Joined: Nov. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,07:55   

Quote (didymos @ April 17 2008,06:32)
I only see one problem with the idea, and that is that to a lot of Christians "Secular Humanism" is basically identical to "Satanism".  I think for some, it'd actually be better to be an honest-to-God Satanist than a Secular Humanist.

Say what you will about the tenets of devil worship, at least it's an ethos!

--------------
"ALL eight of the "nature" miracles of Jesus could have been accomplished via the electroweak quantum tunneling mechanism. For example, walking on water could be accomplished by directing a neutrino beam created just below Jesus' feet downward." - Frank Tipler, ISCID fellow

  
PTET



Posts: 133
Joined: Jan. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,07:58   

Quote
42
Janice
04/17/2008
6:18 am

Thus all these people, and not just atheist evolutionary biologists, have been incited to crime and are at risk of succumbing to the temptation to commit a crime because they do not have a personal relationship with the risen Lord.

All science so far.

Someone must have cranked up the stupidity dial at UD, 'cause the tard is reaching record levels...

And Janice, should you ever leave UD and stumble  across this post... I think you are a c__t.

--------------
"It’s not worth the effort to prove the obvious. Ridiculous ideas don’t deserve our time.
Even the attempt to formulate ID is a generous accommodation." - ScottAndrews

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,09:01   

Quote (PTET @ April 17 2008,07:58)
Quote
42
Janice
04/17/2008
6:18 am

Thus all these people, and not just atheist evolutionary biologists, have been incited to crime and are at risk of succumbing to the temptation to commit a crime because they do not have a personal relationship with the risen Lord.

All science so far.

Someone must have cranked up the stupidity dial at UD, 'cause the tard is reaching record levels...

And Janice, should you ever leave UD and stumble  across this post... I think you are a c__t.

Allen slaps her down:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/evoluti....-240771

Quote
54

Allen_MacNeill

04/17/2008

8:51 am
Janice wrote (in #42):

“It was just under 20% of the sample.”

Janice is apparently both mathematically and logically impaired. If you add up the percentages listed in my post (#8, above), they total 98.8%. This means that the “non-respondent” frequency was 0.02%, not “just under 20%”. Off by four orders of magnitude…

Furthermore, Janice has taken it upon herself to speculate on my tendency toward a life of crime. Character assassination, while it seems to be the hobby of people like Janice, is not generally considered to be one of the tools of a scholar.

Furthermore, Janice asserts that:

“…all these people, and not just atheist evolutionary biologists, have been incited to crime and are at risk of succumbing to the temptation to commit a crime because they do not have a personal relationship with the risen Lord.”

The abuse of logic and evidence in this quote is so beyond the pale as to require almost no comment. In the complete absence of confirmatory data, Janice has concluded that the criminals who did not indicate their religious beliefs were motivated in their crimes by the lack of “…a personal relationship with the risen Lord.”

Using the same logic, I could assert that they were motivated in their crimes by the lack of their belief in the Tooth Fairy. After all, none of the respondents stated that they either believed or did not believe in the Tooth Fairy. Indeed, their beliefs in the Tooth Fairy were not recorded. According to “Janice logic”, this means that they can be included in the category of “people who were motivated in their crimes by macroevolutionary theory.”

If a student turned in an essay with this kind of twisted logic in one of my courses, they would receive an F and would be recommended for psychological counseling.


Daft bint.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Quidam



Posts: 229
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,09:17   

I am split over whether I would watch it. I rather feel I should, but I don't need to actually watch "2 girls 1 cup" to know what it contains and that it's nasty and not something I want to watch. I haven't seen 'The Passion' either, because I have seen enough clips to know that 2 hours of the best blood modern cinema can provide splattering a bunch of B movie actors is not the kind of thing I would enjoy - very much like the '2 Girls' movie except that most of the the excrement and vomit is replaced by blood.

I'll maybe see it when it comes to a church basement with free cookies. As long as they are home-made cookies. Oatmeal and raisin. Oh and good coffee. And a blow job from the Pastor's daughter. Both of them.

--------------
The organized fossils ... and their localities also, may be understood by all, even the most illiterate. William Smith, Strata. 1816

  
olegt



Posts: 1405
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,09:22   

Allen's comments have unleashed a flood of fresh tard.  For instance, bililiad writes (quoting a previous post by William J. Murray):
Quote

Quote

To claim that materialistic Darwinists display “good” behavior and “noble” humanitarian ideals now is irrelevant; they do so by sleeping in a cultural bed of traditional spiritual thought and values. Will those high ideals still be in place after 200 years of a culture embracing materialistic Darwinism?

So true! But whenever I try to make this point out to Darwinists, they treat me like I am a blithering idiot.

They always come back with boring gibberish about how evolution works across populations and not individuals, and how groups always achieve more than lone individuals, and how morality and altruism both have evolutionary explanations, and nonsense like that.

But Janice has it right: true morality is all about having a personal relationship with Jesus Christ.

Now if only Ben Stein would convert - he’d be my true hero and I’d be in seventh heaven!

Is this guy is an AtBC sockpuppet or indeed a blithering IDiot?  Impossible to tell.  Further proof that ID is indistinguishable from its parody.

--------------
If you are not:
Galapagos Finch
please Logout »

  
Zachriel



Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,09:35   

Kudos to RichardFry for mining the kairosfocus vein, whose T.A.R.D may be hard, but a single well-placed chisel will surely cleave. Kairosfocus introduces a clovis point spearhead.

Quote
kairosfocus: In the cosmos, I think a handy rock from your backyard — as I stated above — is an excellent case in point of an object that may well be part of a designed world, but which is not specifically designed; by contrast with, say, finding a clovis point stone spearhead in the same backyard.

RichardFry: Can we run a rock and a Clovis point arrowhead into the EF just for fun?

kairosfocus: Next, we observe actual cases: a common, garden variety rock is credibly a product of chance + necessity, but say a Clovis point spearhead is not. And, the evident functionality, characteristic stylistic features and vast array of alternative configs for a rock show that the Clovis point exhibits FSCI and is designed. [In fact it is used as a diagnostic of certain ancient cultures in the Americas.]

RichardFry: Presumably you determined this partly by comparing the values of Complex Specified Informatinon for a rock and a Clovis point? What were the values you obtained for the CSI of each? Please don’t explain it further, or refer to your always linked, Just put the figure down (or whatever form it takes) for each please.

kairosfocus: No need: basic common sense and a little observation will do nicely.

Going beyond that, we may observe that functionally specified complex organisation is just as effective an index of the action of agency as is a measured value of he statistical weights of functional and non-functional subsets of the config space for an observed functional element. Random rocks don’t make good spear heads, which in turn tend to be pointed, symmetrical, adapted for hafting, and conform to styles, also showing signs of flint knapping. All of which were discussed and linked above...


RichardFry: So there’s “no need” to tell me the CSI you obtained for each item? Basic common sense and observation tell us that the sun orbits the earth. The whole point of formalising such a method of design detection is that it is formalised!

It’s very convinenent that the crux upon which your argument rests does not need anything other then basic common sense to prove it’s case.

I’ll ask again. What were the values of the CSI in the Clovis point and the rock? It’s a calculation you claim to have done. So lets see the “working”, don’t just give me “it’s obvious”


kairosfocus: No need: basic common sense and a little observation will do nicely.

To those unfamiliar with the kairosfocus vein, you might think that RichardFry's ore is of the usual kind. (How many times have each of us asked for an example of the calculation of CSI for anything but playing cards?) But consider! On this single thread kairosfocus posted an incredible

  89 pages (single-space, 8˝x11)
  40805 words
  239671 characters
,

and still didn't answer the question. Panning through that much debris was truly a Herculean task.

Congratulations to John Henry RichardFry!

--------------

You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

   
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,09:42   

Dear bililiad:



Quote
Lilly teacher blithering idiot, by chrisrobinson1945


--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
sparc



Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,11:15   

Quote
  89 pages (single-space, 8˝x11)
 40805 words
 239671 characters
most of it is copy/paste, isn't it?

--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
Zachriel



Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 17 2008,11:34   

Quote (sparc @ April 17 2008,11:15)
       
Quote
  89 pages (single-space, 8˝x11)
 40805 words
 239671 characters
most of it is copy/paste, isn't it?

That sounds like a factually challenged, logically incoherent position to me. I find it interesting that in a context where science — rightly understood  — is an empirically anchored, open-ended, provisional search for the truth about the world we experience and observe, there is now a resort to proposed undiscovered laws to explain what I wrote. There is a basic factor in the platonic chance-necessity-art trichotomy [though even Plato seemed to think it was immemorial in his day]. Namely, lawlike regularities are associated with outcomes of low contingency. And, it has to be a law of contingency that bears complex, functional information. There IS an observed regularity on that — intelligence. Onlookers, simply compare what I excerpted and discussed above. We can further take it as a given that if the argument in the main [that, contra Heller, design is evident in the cosmos and in cell based life and that it is not Manichean heresy to see that] were easily overturned, it would have been, so your resort to one red herring after another; leading out to one strawman after another (then duly pummelled – at least, not soaked in oil of ad hominem and ignited to cloud and poison the atmosphere through polarisation and confusion), is indicative of the balance of the case on the merits of fact and logic. And, not to his advantage. Having noted that general point, we need to address the usual cluster of tangential red herrings, yet again, so that certain points may be made clear. [...]

I hope that answered your question satisfactorily.

--------------

You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

   
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < ... 896 897 898 899 900 [901] 902 903 904 905 906 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]