Faid
Posts: 1143
Joined: Mar. 2006
|
A (sort of) Goobye post to dave
(no boldcaps, I'm done with that-almost)
oh man. Even at the end of this tired old thread, dave manages to embarrass himself again- on Wikipedia nonetheless! What was that dave? "Recombination cannot create new alleles"?
Do you know what recombination is?
Do you know what an allele is?
Face it, dave. You can be many things, but "amateur scientist" is not one of them.
Sorry to (yet again) bust your delusions of grandeur,but you are as related to science as Paris Hilton is to Mother Teresa.
What happened to Jan Pezckis and his Dancing Macaques, dave?
What happened to all that explaining you would do about Sanford, Crow, the Schoen paper and it's supposed relevance?
What did your pal Sanford have to say about why, always according to his "theory", all those 'higher genome' animals didn't become extinct after the flood?
Or didn't you talk about that- just chatted about evos and how "stubborn" they are?
I could, of course, go on (and on, and on) looking backwards in this thread, dave. But what's the use? You'll just claim you "already answered", "sucessfully refuted", "beat down" or "demolished" all those questions, like the HUGE MOUNTAIN of ones before them...
...And, of course, NEVER GIVE A LINK. Or repost the same old assertions and blabber, as if noone ever addressed them.
We've come to know you like the plam of our hand by now, dave. And, I must say that, without a doubt, You are the most amazing creationist I have seen.
(oh and PLEASE PRETTY PLEASE quotemine this. I'd love to see you do it and then simply quote my next paragraph:)
You are the most amazing creationist I have seen, because I have never, NEVER seen such a blatant mix of IGNORANCE, ARROGANCE AND DISHONESTY.
You are, of course, ignorant: your complete lack of education in issues others know about from their highscool years is evident in every post. You are even unable to construct a coherent argument without relying on your precious AiG quotes:
But that's no big thing. Almost all creationists are, and those that are not, often declare that they had willfully rejected all their previous knowledge for the sake of blind faith. Nothing new.
You also are unbelievably arrogant: Your inflated ego always seeks ways to shine through. Saying you are an "amateur scientist", that "you are no expert in genetics YET" (as if it were possible you ever would be), an so on- and of course, combined with your ignorance, this leads to hilarious results:
Claiming to have "answered your own question", after a dozen people explain your stupid mistake to you,
Gloating about how "you bet" that "Dr. Russel Durbin" didn't know about Lysigony (Lysigony, for crying out loud), and about how YOU, a CREATIONIST, supposedly told him first,
And other instances too numerous to mention, except, of course, the most prominent one: The Poruguese Moment, when you "sawed off the branch", only to realize you were sitting on the wrong end... And ever since, act as if you "won", to keep your poor ego from collapsing in tears inside your head.
But, then again, that's no biggie either. Many YECs are arrogant: I suppose trying to claim you know better than 99% of scientists requires some amount of arrogance. 
No dave, something else makes you stand out. It's your amazing level of blatant DISHONESTY.
At first, it surprised me; I couldn't think how a person that calls himself a christian would distance himself so much from honesty.
Then it got me angry; I thought that, in your mind, the fact that you were "on a mission" supposedly gave you the right to lie and ignore and distort and evade the truth, all for the sake of your God, and I resented that...
...But then I realized it wasn't about your God at all; you were lying to protect your fragile little ego. To maintain the image of the Knight in shining armor you had imposed on yourself, to deal with your inferiority complex towards those that are more educated and, well, more smart than you (or do you think it's not clear to all what things like, say, your mocking declaration of other people's titles and credentials, show?)
Nowdays, whenever I see you lie (and get caught lying, and lie to cover that up, and then lose track of your lies- see my SIG, dave) I just laugh and laugh. 
But, I see it's going to end soon. This infamous thread will end, and AFDave the Great will leave us, never to return- save to make a cowardly hit-and-run post or two.
(Not that anyone's gonna ban you or anything, of course: You'll simply won't stand not being the center of attention. And we both know it.)
But wait: there's still time! All you have to do is to offer a single, teensy bit of evidence in favor of your "scientific hypothesis"! How about some archaeological finds related to the Ark? Some evidence or records of an Ice Age in the third millenia BC? Oh oh I know, some proof that humans and dinosaurs coexisted! THAT must be abundant!
Come on, champ, you can do it!
...
Oh man I kill me sometimes, as that other Dave would say.
Good-bye, dave with a lowercase d. You are a joke, as your YEC beliefs are a joke. And you know it. You know that there's no way you'll ever get them to be anything more than a joke, as long as the Civilized World, the world of Science and Reason, exists. And you know, deep down in your hearts, underneath all those defense mechanisms that keep your mind from seeing the facts, you know time works against you.
That's why you try to fool small kids and gullible minds. And keep praying for the Rupture, of course.
Good luck with that. You'll need it. 
--------------
A look into DAVE HAWKINS' sense of honesty:
"The truth is that ALL mutations REDUCE information"
"...mutations can add information to a genome. And remember, I have never said that this is not possible."
|
