RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (12) < ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 >   
  Topic: The limits of darwinism., Utunumsint's thread.< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,10:05   

Actually it was the Muslims that preserved Greek knowledge, which was then picked up by Europeans, resulting in the Renaissance, which means rebirth. Rebirth of classical learning.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,10:08   

Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,09:14)
It was the Catholic church that gave us universities, and the laid the foundation for western tought.

It was the Catholic church that gave us universities the Inquisition, and the laid the foundation for western tought Abu Ghraib.

We can play this anecdotal game all day if you want...

But it seems pointless.

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
Utunumsint



Posts: 103
Joined: Jan. 2010

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,10:26   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Feb. 11 2010,09:56)
Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,09:14)


It was the Catholic church that gave us universities, and the laid the foundation for western tought. I think *you* should bone up on *your* history.

Quote
None of that is because of "revealed truth". None whatsoever. And anyway, universities existed before Catholics.


Quote
Greece

   * The Platonic Academy (sometimes referred to as the University of Athens[3][4]), founded ca. 387 BC in Athens by Plato.

China

   * Taixue was established in 3CE.
   * Nanjing University (National Central University) was founded in 259 AD.

Korea

   * Taehak was founded in 372 and Gukhak was established in 682.

India

   * Nalanda University an ancient university was established in the 5th century AD in Bihar, India.

Iran

   * Academy of Gundishapur was an important medical centre of the 6th and 7th centuries AD.

Japan

   * Ashikaga Gakko was founded in 9th century and restored in 1432.


Quote
So, er, perhaps it's you that needs a history lesson.


Lets start with Plato's academy, since all the other schools you mentioned are not western.

The only reason we still have plato's works, or the works of stoics, or the works of aristotle, or pythagoras, or any work of classical history is because some Monk in the dark ages decided it was worth preserving on hides.

Another thing they preserved was Roman Law. The Catholiic Church was the only institution that still practiced Roman Law in the dark ages. Roman law was an indispensible part of the development of canon law (religious law). Since in the dark ages, with the constant attacks from north African muslims, magyares, and vikings, the secular kingdoms had degenerated into lawless tyrannies, all looked to Rome for some kind of justice. After the invasions had settled down, the secular rules soon saw the benefits of emulating this law, so they set up the foundations for universities. Most notable are Oxford and Paris. The magistrates there based their model of education on what was taught in the monasteries. The curiculum was called the trivium and quadrivium. Notable in this curriculum was the teaching of physics, theology, philosophy, geometry, and even biology.

My point here is that their ties with religious institutions set them apart from the secular world of politics, and power, unlike Plato's school. Reason and clear thinking were essential, and produced some of the very great thinkers.

How this all relates to theology is well illustrated in the link provided by Quack on the dividing line between science and theology worked out during the middle ages.

Quote
Exactly what do you want religion to fix?


Quote
could start with the  Jihads and holy wars you yourself mentioned. I seem to remember some incidents where some believers killed some other believers simply because they were of different religions. Fix that first eh?


Actually, the crusades were to free European pilgrims to the holy land from molestation from muslim raiders and rulers. Muslims were also pressing in on the borders of Byzantium an Constantinople. Without the forsight of the early popes, we would all now be under Sharia law. The Crusades were primarily a defensive war.

There is one notable exception to this, and that is the Albigentian crusade. Not a memorable moment in Catholic history.

Religious warefare got really bad during the Protestant reformation, but there were many factors involved with these truggles, and most of the time, the underlying motivation for these wars was political and financial. Not religious.

Quote
Thanks. I hear what you are saying, but I dispute your logic. You say more time is required to apply reason to revealed truth. I say you've had thousands of years and you are still fighting amongst yourselves as to what "truth" is.

As this is your turf, perhaps you can say how much longer it is before all religions accept each other peacefully? You've had thousands of years already, you really think it's happening anytime soon?


Can you answer me this question for the secular world? Why is there no world peace today? Why has the UN not solved all the problems in the world? Why was the 20th century one of the bloodiest centuries in human history?

Cheers,
Ut

  
Chayanov



Posts: 289
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,10:28   

Quote
It was the Catholic church that gave us universities, and the laid the foundation for western tought. I think you should bone up on your history.

In the immortal words of Pauli, "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong."

--------------
Help! Marxist literary critics are following me!

  
Utunumsint



Posts: 103
Joined: Jan. 2010

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,10:33   

Quote (Albatrossity2 @ Feb. 11 2010,10:08)
Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,09:14)
It was the Catholic church that gave us universities, and the laid the foundation for western tought.

It was the Catholic church that gave us universities the Inquisition, and the laid the foundation for western tought Abu Ghraib.

We can play this anecdotal game all day if you want...

But it seems pointless.

The inquisitions run by the Catholic Church were based on Roman law and were a response to the superstitious mob violence going on against pretty much anyone who was different. It only involved heretics from the Catholic Church (never Jews or Muslims). In Roman law, unlike local laws of the time, you were given an defendant. Punishments were very much less severe than the secular courts which were travesties of justice. The worst inquisitions were run by secular kingdoms, and not by the catholic church. The spanish inquisition comes to mind here.

Is it really pointless to talk about history? There are some very bad unsubstantiated acusations that are commonly thrown about from time to time, such as the death tool of the inquisition. Some put the killings as high as 100 000 000, which is ridicilous since the entire population of Europe was over several hundreds of years was much lower than that number.

But you are right. This is really off topic in this thread.

Cheers,
Ut

  
Utunumsint



Posts: 103
Joined: Jan. 2010

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,10:37   

Quote (midwifetoad @ Feb. 11 2010,10:05)
Actually it was the Muslims that preserved Greek knowledge, which was then picked up by Europeans, resulting in the Renaissance, which means rebirth. Rebirth of classical learning.

Agreed, but the renaissance had much more to it than just the introduction of Aristotle. There was great economic prosperity, a huge upsurge in intellectual though, both before the works of Aristotle were translated and after. Savage kingdoms were taking on the model of diplomacy, some if which we still have today, from the formalized model of the papal court. Religious advances, such as the Franciscan theology, provided a newfound respect for nature, and natural law, as opposed to the platonic dualism that the dark ages tended to favour.

Should I go on?

Cheers,
Ut

  
Utunumsint



Posts: 103
Joined: Jan. 2010

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,10:38   

Quote (Chayanov @ Feb. 11 2010,10:28)
Quote
It was the Catholic church that gave us universities, and the laid the foundation for western tought. I think you should bone up on your history.

In the immortal words of Pauli, "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong."

Ah, we have a scholar of history here I suppose. Can you provide some kind of evidence for your powerful rebuttal? :)

Cheers,
Ut

  
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,10:40   

Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,10:33)
It only involved heretics from the Catholic Church (never Jews or Muslims).

Do tell. So the expulsion of Spanish Jews, at the hands of the Spanish Inquisition, has been erased from your history book? And the Inquisition in Goa, which punished folks for observing non-Catholic holidays, is similarly forgotten?

How very convenient for you.

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,10:50   

Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,10:26)
Lets start with Plato's academy, since all the other schools you mentioned are not western.

I'm sorry, I did not see "western universities" you simply said "university". So what relevance is it where they were based? Universities were not invented by Catholics or given to us by Catholics!
   
Quote
Can you answer me this question for the secular world? Why is there no world peace today? Why has the UN not solved all the problems in the world? Why was the 20th century one of the bloodiest centuries in human history?

Religion. The UN is made up of many overtly religious countries. The last remaining superpower, the USA, won't elect an atheist. So there really is no "secular world", there's just less or more secular parts in the world.

You are fooling yourself if you think that they are separate issues.

Even if world peace were to break out tomorrow I'm sure the first outbreak of hostilities would be down to a religious cause.

Quote
Without the forsight of the early popes, we would all now be under Sharia law. The Crusades were primarily a defensive war.

And I guess you think that would be a bad thing right? But why? To me it's little different to being forced to live your life under Catholic "law". It's just that you can't see that because to you Catholic dogma is "normal" and Sharia law is "alien". Don't you think that people who want to implement Sharia law think it's great and the way you live is awful? It's the same thing but you can't see that because you are "inside" the problem. I can look at both and say I want neither. You cannot, you just don't want the one you don't already have. But I'm sure you would like to convert people to your way of thinking (perhaps not you but your religion wants that) and so it's the same with Muslims.

Just two sides of the same coin.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,10:51   

Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,10:33)
The inquisitions run by the Catholic Church were based on Roman law and were a response to the superstitious mob violence going on against pretty much anyone who was different. It only involved heretics from the Catholic Church (never Jews or Muslims).

That's all right then. Much like the Kray twins, they never harmed anybody other then their own.

The Kray's were still murdering bastards however.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kray_twins

Pah.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Utunumsint



Posts: 103
Joined: Jan. 2010

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,10:52   

Quote (Albatrossity2 @ Feb. 11 2010,10:40)
Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,10:33)
It only involved heretics from the Catholic Church (never Jews or Muslims).

Do tell. So the expulsion of Spanish Jews, at the hands of the Spanish Inquisition, has been erased from your history book? And the Inquisition in Goa, which punished folks for observing non-Catholic holidays, is similarly forgotten?

How very convenient for you.

Run by the secular rulers.

And not forgotten. I'm not saying there nothing bad ever happened in the name of religion, but comparing the track record of western Chrisendom over the last 1500 years compared to the atrocities of the secular world of the 20th century committed in the name of progress, gives you a little prespective.

I understand why many of you here have a grudge against religion, as anti science and anti religion, but my only point in posting all these historical facts is to show that science and religion have rarely, in history been antagonistic. At least not in the way many people portray it today.

Cheers,
Ut

  
Alan Fox



Posts: 1556
Joined: Aug. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,10:52   

Quote (Albatrossity2 @ Feb. 11 2010,05:40)
 
Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,10:33)
It only involved heretics from the Catholic Church (never Jews or Muslims).

Do tell. So the expulsion of Spanish Jews, at the hands of the Spanish Inquisition, has been erased from your history book? And the Inquisition in Goa, which punished folks for observing non-Catholic holidays, is similarly forgotten?

How very convenient for you.

The sack of Béziers which opened the Albigensian Crusade?

"Kill them all! God will know his own!"

-Arnaud Amalric, papal legate.

  
Utunumsint



Posts: 103
Joined: Jan. 2010

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,10:57   

Quote (Alan Fox @ Feb. 11 2010,10:52)
Quote (Albatrossity2 @ Feb. 11 2010,05:40)
   
Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,10:33)
It only involved heretics from the Catholic Church (never Jews or Muslims).

Do tell. So the expulsion of Spanish Jews, at the hands of the Spanish Inquisition, has been erased from your history book? And the Inquisition in Goa, which punished folks for observing non-Catholic holidays, is similarly forgotten?

How very convenient for you.

The sack of Béziers which opened the Albigensian Crusade?

"Kill them all! God will know his own!"

-Arnaud Amalric, papal legate.

I mentioned that one.

Thanks
Ut

  
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,11:01   

Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,10:52)
Run by the secular rulers.

Who weren't secular at all, but rabidly religious. With the blessing and assistance of the popes in Rome.

Or can you provide evidence that anyone in power in the Vatican ever rebuked the Spaniards or the Portuguese for their actions on behalf of the Roman Catholic Church?

Otherwise, this is nothing but weaseling.

And we haven't even gotten to Galileo's troubles with the Vatican. I suppose that will  be excused by saying that it was really the "secular" government of Italy or one of the city-states?

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
Utunumsint



Posts: 103
Joined: Jan. 2010

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,11:05   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Feb. 11 2010,10:50)
Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,10:26)
Lets start with Plato's academy, since all the other schools you mentioned are not western.

I'm sorry, I did not see "western universities" you simply said "university". So what relevance is it where they were based? Universities were not invented by Catholics or given to us by Catholics!
   
Quote
Can you answer me this question for the secular world? Why is there no world peace today? Why has the UN not solved all the problems in the world? Why was the 20th century one of the bloodiest centuries in human history?

Religion. The UN is made up of many overtly religious countries. The last remaining superpower, the USA, won't elect an atheist. So there really is no "secular world", there's just less or more secular parts in the world.

You are fooling yourself if you think that they are separate issues.

Even if world peace were to break out tomorrow I'm sure the first outbreak of hostilities would be down to a religious cause.

 
Quote
Without the forsight of the early popes, we would all now be under Sharia law. The Crusades were primarily a defensive war.

And I guess you think that would be a bad thing right? But why? To me it's little different to being forced to live your life under Catholic "law". It's just that you can't see that because to you Catholic dogma is "normal" and Sharia law is "alien". Don't you think that people who want to implement Sharia law think it's great and the way you live is awful? It's the same thing but you can't see that because you are "inside" the problem. I can look at both and say I want neither. You cannot, you just don't want the one you don't already have. But I'm sure you would like to convert people to your way of thinking (perhaps not you but your religion wants that) and so it's the same with Muslims.

Just two sides of the same coin.

So the cold war was run by religious? World War I and II were religiously motivated? Can you provide quotes from Popes declaring for one side or another, or calling out for violent action?

Why does it seem to me that any failure or inhumanity practiced by a secular athiestic government would be ultimatly blamed on religion somehow? How about the bloody French Revolution? Or Stalin's gulags?

Cheers,
Ut

  
Utunumsint



Posts: 103
Joined: Jan. 2010

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,11:10   

Quote (Albatrossity2 @ Feb. 11 2010,11:01)
Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,10:52)
Run by the secular rulers.

Who weren't secular at all, but rabidly religious. With the blessing and assistance of the popes in Rome.

Or can you provide evidence that anyone in power in the Vatican ever rebuked the Spaniards or the Portuguese for their actions on behalf of the Roman Catholic Church?

Otherwise, this is nothing but weaseling.

And we haven't even gotten to Galileo's troubles with the Vatican. I suppose that will  be excused by saying that it was really the "secular" government of Italy or one of the city-states?

History is what it is. Bad things happened.

But to ascribe the root of all evil to religion is simplistic at best.

To see science and religion as antagonistic is also simplistic.

And to think that science, and atheism will solve all of the world's problems, is naive.

Are these things that you believe?

Cheers,
Ut

  
Alan Fox



Posts: 1556
Joined: Aug. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,11:11   

Oops!

Missed that, Utunumsint:

Quote
There is one notable exception to this, and that is the Albigentian crusade. Not a memorable moment in Catholic history.


I'll get me coat!

  
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,11:25   

Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,11:10)

History is what it is. Bad things happened.

Yes, and history does not support your notion that secular forces (i.e. secular governments) were the driving force behind the abuses ascribed to the Inquisition. That's my point, and you've not addressed it with this latest weaseling. Hopefully you do understand it, however.

 
Quote
But to ascribe the root of all evil to religion is simplistic at best.

To see science and religion as antagonistic is also simplistic.

And to think that science, and atheism will solve all of the world's problems, is naive.

Are these things that you believe?

No, those are strawmen. I was responding to this statement from you.
Quote
There are a lot of bad theologians and philosophers out there, but I would also say there is a lot of bad science out there as well.

Given the fact that science has a much shorter track record than religion, and given the fact that there have been plenty of theocracies and no scientocracies, I'd posit that the damage done by religion (which is still happening today) might be more substantial than the damage done by science. Yes, there is bad science. But science tends to be self-correcting. I see no such trend for religion...

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
Joy



Posts: 188
Joined: Sep. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,11:25   

Ut:
Quote
I was wondering what your opinion is on the works of Behe specifically, and also on Dembski and Meyers?


I don't have an opinion on the works of Behe, Dembski or Meyers because I've not read their works. I have read discussions, excerpts and other people's re-wordings in blog posts. The impression is that all three are qualified to question aspects of current theory and offer their own thoughts about what else may be going on. Qualification coming from earned credentials, which is how all scientists and whatnot get qualifications. Whether or not they are right is not something I am not qualified to determine. Do watch the show.

Having read Dembski's blog on occasion, I am not impressed with his ability to debate forthrightly with his opponents even when they aren't just slinging mud. Too much censorship. I have issues with the DI's role in the culture war. It looks to me like they have less concern for truth (whatever that turns out to be) than for imposing another orthodoxy. I never liked orthodoxies in science, education or philosophy.

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,11:25   

Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,11:05)

So the cold war was run by religious?

How many people died in that "war"? And was one side religious while the other not, perhaps?
   
Quote
World War I and II were religiously motivated?

At some level, certainly. Hitler was religious! Or at least he gave a good impression of being so.
Quote
Hitler maintained that the "terrorism in religion is, to put it briefly, of a Jewish dogma, which Christianity has universalized and whose effect is to sow trouble and confusion in men's minds."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler
   
Quote
? Can you provide quotes from Popes declaring for one side or another, or calling out for violent action?

Can you provide a quote from the pope at the time condemning Hitler's actions?
   
Quote
Hitler's Pope is a book published in 1999 by the British journalist and author John Cornwell that examines the actions of Pope Pius XII during the Nazi era, and explores the charge that he assisted in the legitimization of Hitler's Nazi regime in Germany, through the pursuit of a Reichskonkordat in 1933. The book is critical of Pius' conduct during the Second World War, criticizing him for not doing enough, or speaking out enough, against the Holocaust. Cornwell argued that Pius's entire career as the nuncio to Germany, cardinal secretary of state, and pope was characterized by a desire to increase and centralize the power of the Papacy, and that he subordinated opposition to the Nazis to that goal. He further argued that Pius was anti-Semitic and that this stance prevented him from caring about the European Jews.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler%27s_Pope
   
Quote
Why does it seem to me that any failure or inhumanity practiced by a secular athiestic government would be ultimatly blamed on religion somehow?

There are very few of those. And those that have existed can shoulder the blame.
   
Quote
How about the bloody French Revolution? Or Stalin's gulags?

Resentment of clerical advantage was certainly a factor in the French Revolution.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Utunumsint



Posts: 103
Joined: Jan. 2010

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,11:32   

Quote (Albatrossity2 @ Feb. 11 2010,11:25)
Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,11:10)

History is what it is. Bad things happened.

Quote
Yes, and history does not support your notion that secular forces (i.e. secular governments) were the driving force behind the abuses ascribed to the Inquisition. That's my point, and you've not addressed it with this latest weaseling. Hopefully you do understand it, however.


How many people were killed in the Spanish Inquisition? Can you provide me a number and we can go from there to compare this admittedly bad situation to some more modern atheistic examples?

Quote
But to ascribe the root of all evil to religion is simplistic at best.

To see science and religion as antagonistic is also simplistic.

And to think that science, and atheism will solve all of the world's problems, is naive.

Are these things that you believe?


Quote
No, those are strawmen. I was responding to this statement from you.


Quote
There are a lot of bad theologians and philosophers out there, but I would also say there is a lot of bad science out there as well.


Quote
Given the fact that science has a much shorter track record than religion, and given the fact that there have been plenty of theocracies and no scientocracies, I'd posit that the damage done by religion (which is still happening today) might be more substantial than the damage done by science. Yes, there is bad science. But science tends to be self-correcting. I see no such trend for religion...


Thanks for clarifying. And thanks for at least making the statement tentative.

But maybe I can ask you a follow up question. How does science govern a nation, or provide guidance on ethics, or create a political theories?

Cheers,
Ut

  
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,11:36   

Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,11:32)
How many people were killed in the Spanish Inquisition? Can you provide me a number and we can go from there to compare this admittedly bad situation to some more modern atheistic examples?

If you continue to equate atheism with science, we cannot have a civil discussion. Do you believe that they are equivalent? If so, I'll let you go without further comment, because we obviously have no common ground in our definitions.

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
Utunumsint



Posts: 103
Joined: Jan. 2010

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,11:40   

Quote (Albatrossity2 @ Feb. 11 2010,11:36)
Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,11:32)
How many people were killed in the Spanish Inquisition? Can you provide me a number and we can go from there to compare this admittedly bad situation to some more modern atheistic examples?

If you continue to equate atheism with science, we cannot have a civil discussion. Do you believe that they are equivalent? If so, I'll let you go without further comment, because we obviously have no common ground in our definitions.

Yes. Perhaps it would be a good time to take a breather.

I'm responding to the idea that religion and science are mutually antagonistic. This seems to be old man's position anyway, which leaves only atheism. I'm sorry if I assumed it was yours position as well.

No, I do not believe that science is equated with atheism. Science does not provide arguments, only data, and an understanding of the physical universe, and as such is not atheistic, or religious, or even agnostic. Its just science.

Cheers,
Ut

  
Utunumsint



Posts: 103
Joined: Jan. 2010

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,11:49   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Feb. 11 2010,11:25)
Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,11:05)

So the cold war was run by religious?

How many people died in that "war"? And was one side religious while the other not, perhaps?
   
Quote
World War I and II were religiously motivated?

At some level, certainly. Hitler was religious! Or at least he gave a good impression of being so.
 
Quote
Hitler maintained that the "terrorism in religion is, to put it briefly, of a Jewish dogma, which Christianity has universalized and whose effect is to sow trouble and confusion in men's minds."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler
   
Quote
? Can you provide quotes from Popes declaring for one side or another, or calling out for violent action?

Can you provide a quote from the pope at the time condemning Hitler's actions?
   
Quote
Hitler's Pope is a book published in 1999 by the British journalist and author John Cornwell that examines the actions of Pope Pius XII during the Nazi era, and explores the charge that he assisted in the legitimization of Hitler's Nazi regime in Germany, through the pursuit of a Reichskonkordat in 1933. The book is critical of Pius' conduct during the Second World War, criticizing him for not doing enough, or speaking out enough, against the Holocaust. Cornwell argued that Pius's entire career as the nuncio to Germany, cardinal secretary of state, and pope was characterized by a desire to increase and centralize the power of the Papacy, and that he subordinated opposition to the Nazis to that goal. He further argued that Pius was anti-Semitic and that this stance prevented him from caring about the European Jews.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler%27s_Pope
   
Quote
Why does it seem to me that any failure or inhumanity practiced by a secular athiestic government would be ultimatly blamed on religion somehow?

There are very few of those. And those that have existed can shoulder the blame.
   
Quote
How about the bloody French Revolution? Or Stalin's gulags?

Resentment of clerical advantage was certainly a factor in the French Revolution.

With regard to the popes, Pius, XII, while under Piux XI drafted this document in 1936.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mit_brennender_Sorge

Note also the consequences of this open challange to Nazi ideology, and perhaps that might help you understand why the Vatican maintained a very quiet but real resistance during the war.

Cheers,
Ut

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,11:50   

Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,11:40)
This seems to be old man's position anyway, which leaves only atheism.

Not quite. I'm just saying it's irrelevant. NOMA and all that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-overlapping_magisteria

Except that I don't think that magisterium of religion extends over questions of ultimate meaning and moral value in any meaningful way. If it did, well, it's had sufficient time to come up with something meaningful and as yet it has not.

 
Quote
I'm responding to the idea that religion and science are mutually antagonistic.

I find that it's the religious amongst us that hold that view more then the scientists.

I mean, who is up in arms about teaching "Darwinism" in schools? It's not the science community.

Who was against discovery of the true aspects of the solar system and the earth's place in it? It's not scientists.

Who is against condom and contraceptive use? It's not scientists.

So it's true that religion and science are mutually antagonistic. It's just only true from the religious point of view. From the scientific point of view it's really about as relevant as the colour of your socks.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,11:56   

Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,11:49)
Note also the consequences of this open challange to Nazi ideology, and perhaps that might help you understand why the Vatican maintained a very quiet but real resistance during the war.

It seems there's debate even over that
Quote
Catholic holocaust scholar Michael Phayer concludes that the encyclical "condemned racism (but not Hitler or National Socialism, as some have erroneously asserted)".[31] Some scholars have critized Phayer as having relied too much on German documents alone.[32] Other Catholic scholars have regarded the encyclical as "not a heatedly combative document" as the German episcopate entertained hopes of a Modus vivendi with the Nazis. As a result the encyclical was "not directly polemical" but "diplomatically moderate", in contrast to the encyclical Non Abbiamo Bisogno dealing with Italian fascism.[1]


but interesting reading nonetheless.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Utunumsint



Posts: 103
Joined: Jan. 2010

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,11:57   

Here is another article in the Economist reporting on John Cornwell's change of mind on Pius XII.

Quote
JOHN CORNWELL, author of a new life of Pope John Paul II, would have made a fine devil's advocate when the pope's name is one day advanced for sainthood. Unfortunately, he will not be chosen, for John Paul II himself, some two decades ago, scrapped the custom of having a devout Catholic question the virtues of a candidate for beatification or canonisation. The old job of devil's advocate is now, in effect, performed by committee.

Devil's advocates were supposed to be fair-minded, and in the past Mr Cornwell, a prolific writer on Catholic matters, has at times been anything but. As he admits, “Hitler's Pope” (1999), his biography of Pope Pius XII, lacked balance. “I would now argue,” he says, “in the light of the debates and evidence following ‘Hitler's Pope', that Pius XII had so little scope of action that it is impossible to judge the motives for his silence during the war, while Rome was under the heel of Mussolini and later occupied by the Germans.”

Chastened by this experience, Mr Cornwell is now a better biographer. In this life of John Paul II, he celebrates his subject's achievements as well as deploring the mistakes. The pope's heroism is affirmed. As a young would-be priest in occupied Poland, Karol Wojtyla was not intimidated by Nazi efforts to liquidate the Catholic clergy. A priest under Communism, he was again courageous. When the Soviet system imploded, “few would dispute that the inexorable and bloodless process had been initiated by the Polish pope.”. . .

  
Chayanov



Posts: 289
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,11:58   

Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,10:38)
Quote (Chayanov @ Feb. 11 2010,10:28)
Quote
It was the Catholic church that gave us universities, and the laid the foundation for western tought. I think you should bone up on your history.

In the immortal words of Pauli, "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong."

Ah, we have a scholar of history here I suppose. Can you provide some kind of evidence for your powerful rebuttal? :)

Cheers,
Ut

You're the one who said Catholics started universities. Why don't you back up your statements with some actual evidence, instead of equivocating and throwing out strawmen?

--------------
Help! Marxist literary critics are following me!

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,12:00   

Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,11:57)
Here is another article in the Economist reporting on John Cornwell's change of mind on Pius XII.

 
Quote
JOHN CORNWELL, author of a new life of Pope John Paul II, would have made a fine devil's advocate when the pope's name is one day advanced for sainthood. Unfortunately, he will not be chosen, for John Paul II himself, some two decades ago, scrapped the custom of having a devout Catholic question the virtues of a candidate for beatification or canonisation. The old job of devil's advocate is now, in effect, performed by committee.

Devil's advocates were supposed to be fair-minded, and in the past Mr Cornwell, a prolific writer on Catholic matters, has at times been anything but. As he admits, “Hitler's Pope” (1999), his biography of Pope Pius XII, lacked balance. “I would now argue,” he says, “in the light of the debates and evidence following ‘Hitler's Pope', that Pius XII had so little scope of action that it is impossible to judge the motives for his silence during the war, while Rome was under the heel of Mussolini and later occupied by the Germans.”

Chastened by this experience, Mr Cornwell is now a better biographer. In this life of John Paul II, he celebrates his subject's achievements as well as deploring the mistakes. The pope's heroism is affirmed. As a young would-be priest in occupied Poland, Karol Wojtyla was not intimidated by Nazi efforts to liquidate the Catholic clergy. A priest under Communism, he was again courageous. When the Soviet system imploded, “few would dispute that the inexorable and bloodless process had been initiated by the Polish pope.”. . .

Sure, I knew that, but
Quote
The author, himself, has since retracted his accusations in substantial part[3][7][8], saying that it is "impossible to judge the motives" of the Pope.[5][6] but that "Nevertheless, due to his ineffectual and diplomatic language in respect of the Nazis and the Jews, I still believe that it was incumbent on him to explain his failure to speak out after the war. This he never did." [9]


--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Utunumsint



Posts: 103
Joined: Jan. 2010

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2010,12:05   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Feb. 11 2010,12:00)
Quote (Utunumsint @ Feb. 11 2010,11:57)
Here is another article in the Economist reporting on John Cornwell's change of mind on Pius XII.

 
Quote
JOHN CORNWELL, author of a new life of Pope John Paul II, would have made a fine devil's advocate when the pope's name is one day advanced for sainthood. Unfortunately, he will not be chosen, for John Paul II himself, some two decades ago, scrapped the custom of having a devout Catholic question the virtues of a candidate for beatification or canonisation. The old job of devil's advocate is now, in effect, performed by committee.

Devil's advocates were supposed to be fair-minded, and in the past Mr Cornwell, a prolific writer on Catholic matters, has at times been anything but. As he admits, “Hitler's Pope” (1999), his biography of Pope Pius XII, lacked balance. “I would now argue,” he says, “in the light of the debates and evidence following ‘Hitler's Pope', that Pius XII had so little scope of action that it is impossible to judge the motives for his silence during the war, while Rome was under the heel of Mussolini and later occupied by the Germans.”

Chastened by this experience, Mr Cornwell is now a better biographer. In this life of John Paul II, he celebrates his subject's achievements as well as deploring the mistakes. The pope's heroism is affirmed. As a young would-be priest in occupied Poland, Karol Wojtyla was not intimidated by Nazi efforts to liquidate the Catholic clergy. A priest under Communism, he was again courageous. When the Soviet system imploded, “few would dispute that the inexorable and bloodless process had been initiated by the Polish pope.”. . .

Sure, I knew that, but
 
Quote
The author, himself, has since retracted his accusations in substantial part[3][7][8], saying that it is "impossible to judge the motives" of the Pope.[5][6] but that "Nevertheless, due to his ineffectual and diplomatic language in respect of the Nazis and the Jews, I still believe that it was incumbent on him to explain his failure to speak out after the war. This he never did." [9]

He was too busy trying to save the lives of Italian Jews.

Cheers,
Ut

  
  333 replies since Jan. 28 2010,12:18 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (12) < ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]