RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (500) < ... 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 2, general discussion of Dembski's site< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Jkrebs



Posts: 590
Joined: Sep. 2004

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2008,16:43   

Robbie points out the truth about the Obama video, and throws in an editorial comment.  How will Dave take this?

Quote

4
Robbie
09/21/2008
4:36 pm

This is a video from JohnMcCain.com… not the Obama campaign or, fwiw, PZ’s site.

Propaganda much?



Link

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2008,16:47   

Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Sep. 21 2008,14:58)
I think I related the case when I was in the Boy Scouts, and a fellow came in as a guest speaker, witnessing about his falling in with bad company, drugs, and delinquency, and since finding Jesus he was all better now. Up until a year before or so, I had been the fellow he hung out with, and I certainly had no recall of the drugs and delinquency part of the social program.

Maybe you were too drunk and high to remember?

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2008,17:00   

Quote


sxussd13

09/21/2008

1:17 pm

Why are people being banned around here?


http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-295823



"uhhh....because it's Uncommon Descent?"

   
Jkrebs



Posts: 590
Joined: Sep. 2004

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2008,17:18   

Dave's tells it like it is:

Quote


17

DaveScot

09/21/2008

4:54 pm

sparc

Try to keep up. Allen MacNeil isn’t banned here. Jack Krebs doesn’t know his ass from his elbow in either biology or theology yet consumed vast quantities of bandwidth expressing his opinions in both. He simply took up too much time and space in correction. BobOH’s banning wasn’t my doing. As I recall he was snarky with Denyse one time too many and Bill Dembski’s chivalrous instinct got the better of him. In my experience Denyse has a thick enough skin to qualify for being “tough as nails” and doesn’t need protection. Snark rolls off her like water off a duck’s back. For the record I regret the loss of BobOH. He’s two faced, snarky, and not very bright but still represents the cream of the crop amongst our critics and I’d welcome him back.


What do you think Bob - Dave seems to have a pretty high opinion of you!


Link :)

  
Jkrebs



Posts: 590
Joined: Sep. 2004

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2008,17:28   

The next post from Dave:

Quote


DaveScot

09/21/2008

5:12 pm

sparc

As a matter of fact, now that I’m thinking about it, Bill owes me one for unbanning Ted Davis. So I’m going to unban BobOH with same caveat:

BobOH - you’re unbanned but Bill Dembski has the last word so if you can’t keep him happy if he bans you again that’s it.


First of all, I didn't know Ted was unbanned.  Second, I've thought a bit about what would happen if Dave offered to unban me (which seems unlikely given the above post), but I think my considered response would be something along the line of a polite version of "Screw you."

And I don't usually have crude and rude responses like that.  But what Dave giveth Dave can taketh away, and I would have no interest in making myself again subject to the vicissitudes of his whimsical ego.  He has established himself as a little despotic tyrant in his playground, and he made a mockery of some of the central slogans the ID movement pretends to support - you know, teach the controversy, critically analyze ideas, look at both strengths and weaknesses - as well as some of the basic principles of civil discourse.

So I've thrown in my lot with the banned, and burned my bridges with UD - not that that makes any difference to Dave.

  
Wesley R. Elsberry



Posts: 4991
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2008,17:30   

Quote (stevestory @ Sep. 21 2008,16:47)
Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Sep. 21 2008,14:58)
I think I related the case when I was in the Boy Scouts, and a fellow came in as a guest speaker, witnessing about his falling in with bad company, drugs, and delinquency, and since finding Jesus he was all better now. Up until a year before or so, I had been the fellow he hung out with, and I certainly had no recall of the drugs and delinquency part of the social program.

Maybe you were too drunk and high to remember?

I left that in there just for you, you know.

--------------
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

    
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2008,17:31   

Quote
18
DaveScot
09/21/2008
5:12 pm

sparc

As a matter of fact, now that I’m thinking about it, Bill owes me one for unbanning Ted Davis. So I’m going to unban BobOH with same caveat:

BobOH - you’re unbanned but Bill Dembski has the last word so if you can’t keep him happy if he bans you again that’s it.

You know, I'm really hoping Bob says "Fuck you, Dave."

Eta: Jack, now I see your imaginary "screw you" above. You've got to put that F-bomb to work in a situation like this. Accept no substitutes.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
olegt



Posts: 1405
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2008,18:25   

Quote
For the record I regret the loss of BobOH. He’s two faced, snarky, and not very bright but still represents the cream of the crop amongst our critics and I’d welcome him back.

Let DaveTard apologize for this comment first.  Then decline the invitation.

--------------
If you are not:
Galapagos Finch
please Logout »

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2008,18:32   

Quote (olegt @ Sep. 22 2008,00:25)
Quote
For the record I regret the loss of BobOH. He’s two faced, snarky, and not very bright but still represents the cream of the crop amongst our critics and I’d welcome him back.

Let DaveTard apologize for this comment first.  Then decline the invitation.

Ok, that comment from Dave just melted my irony meter.

And it was a good one. And disconnected.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Jkrebs



Posts: 590
Joined: Sep. 2004

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2008,19:23   

The rebellion continues:

Quote

8
GCUGreyArea
09/21/2008
6:26 pm

“…have lost the intellectual battle.”

!

I’d laugh if it wasn’t so tragic.

“Where do they find these clueless chuckleheads and how do they possibly get advanced degrees?”

Here is your answer DaveScot, you find them on Uncommon descent.

Well I guess that’s me expelled. No dissent allowed on uncommon descent.



Link

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2008,19:49   

Quote (Jkrebs @ Sep. 21 2008,20:23)
The rebellion continues:

Quote

8
GCUGreyArea
09/21/2008
6:26 pm

“…have lost the intellectual battle.”

!

I’d laugh if it wasn’t so tragic.

“Where do they find these clueless chuckleheads and how do they possibly get advanced degrees?”

Here is your answer DaveScot, you find them on Uncommon descent.

Well I guess that’s me expelled. No dissent allowed on uncommon descent.



Link

I'd better go make up his bed and put out some clean towels.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
Jkrebs



Posts: 590
Joined: Sep. 2004

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2008,20:11   

Dembski himself banishs GCUGreyArea:

Quote


William Dembski

09/21/2008

7:58 pm

GCUGreyArea: I think you’ll be happier elsewhere, so you have your wish. I didn’t delete your post, however, because it is instructive. The contempt you feel toward ID is the contempt I feel toward Darwinian materialism, only more so. What I find so offensive about that viewpoint is that it bills itself as the antidote to superstition, the only way to enlightenment, and therefore as justified in using any means whatsoever to advance itself.

  
didymos



Posts: 1828
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2008,21:03   

Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Sep. 21 2008,10:42)
It's hard to believe, but BarryA has stepped into the same bucket of shit yet AGAIN:
               
Quote
4
BarryA
09/20/2008
3:17 pm

Jerry...As to your second question, the answer is also “yes.” Both Harris and Klebold were self consciously acting out their Darwinian ideas. They believed (or at least said they believed) they had evolved to a higher plane of existence and owed no more duty to respect the lives of their fellow students than they might owe to livestock (which is to say “none”).

I'll reprise an earlier response to a similar statement:

Barry: You are an attorney. Let's follow the implications of your argument.  

Because Eric Harris was obsessed with and cited concepts drawn from evolutionary theory as justification for his actions at Columbine, it follows that belief in evolutionary theory ("Darwinism") contributed to his horrible, violent acts.

Back during the Great Expelling, someone on Pharyngula thought they were being clever by bringing up Harris and Klebold (with a made-up quote demonstrating their "Darwinist" mindset, natch). So, I had this thought that maybe, just maybe,  a little research might shed some light on the issue.  After literally moments of painstaking examination of Google search results, I discovered some actual relevant sources:

Police report - Everything from school assignments to notebook doodling to fast food receipts to journals, et cetera

http://acolumbinesite.com/ - All sorts of stuff like actual scans of Harris' and Klebold's journals, transcribed version of same, archived web sites, pages about the victims, et cetera

In all of that (and I mean all: the police report alone is 946 pages) Harris was the only one who even used vaguely Darwinian language, and all it amounted to was 'I think some people deserve to die because I think they suck'.  He probably understood evolution even less than the average creationist, or so I gather from this snippet of a book report on Crichton's The Lost World:
     
Quote

In this book, I learned many different ideas for the theory of evolution, such as the theory that all life was created by an alien life form.  I Also learned about a theory that all life is meant to become extinct sometime.  Another theory I learned is that you can not study a habitat without having an effect on it.


He did like the Nazis though (despite also claiming in one document to hate racists) so you can see why TARDs like to try and connect him to Darwin.  Unfortunately, these journal excerpts are all he had to say about "Darwinism" (all grammar, spelling and punctuational offenses in the originals):
         
Quote

YOU KNOW WHAT I LOVE!!!?
---Natural SELECTION!!!!!!!!!! God damn its the best thing that ever happened to the Earth.  Getting rid of all the stupid and weak organisms......but its all natural!! YES! I wish the government would just take off every warning label.  So then all the dumbasses would either severely hurt themselves or DIE! And boom, no more dumbasses. heh.

It would be great if god removed all vaccines and warning labels from everything in the world and let natural selection take its course. All the fat ugly retarded crippled dumbass stupid fuckheads in the world would die, and oh fucking well if a few of the good guys die to.

Isn't America supposed to be the land of the free? How come, if I'm free, I can't deprive a stupid fucking dumbshit from his possessions if he leaves them sitting in the front seat of his fucking van out in plain sight and in the middle of fucking nowhere on a Frifuckingday night. NATURAL SELECTION. Fucker should be shot.

people that only know stupid facts that arent important should be shot, what fucking use are they. NATURAL SELECTION. KILL all retards, people w/ brain fuck ups, drug adics, people cant figure out to use a fucking lighter. GEEEAWD! people spend millions of dollars on saving the lives of retards, and why. I don't buy that shit like "oh hes my son though!" so the fuck what, he aint normal, kill him, put him out his misery. he is only a waste of time and money, then people say "But he is worth the time, he is human too" no he isnt, if he was then he would swalow a bullet cause he would realize what a fucking waste and burden he was.

Retards!!! They are a waste of time and money and effort and energy and space and lots of other stuff too! They need to DIE!!

but before I leave this worthless place, I will kill who ever I deam unfit for anything at all. especially life.

if humans were let to live how we would naturaly it would be chaos and anarchy and the human race wouldnt probably last that long, but hey guess what, thats how its supposed to be!!!!!


All I really get from that is homicidal rage, misanthropy, and a fixation on Nazi eugenics/racial policies, which he wrote an essay about -- the police report contains about a dozen copies of the thing.  Of course, in the essay he left out the bit about approving of Nazi Germany, but wasn't so shy in his journal:
       
Quote
and by the way, this nazi report is boosting my love of killing even more. like the early Nazi government, my brain is like a sponge, sucking up everything that sounds cool and leaving out all that is worthless, thats how Nazism was formed and thats how I will be too!

and
       
Quote

If you recall your history the Nazis came up with a "final solution" to the Jewish problem... kill them all. well incase you havent figured it out yet, I say, "K I L L M A N K I N D" no one should survive.

and
       
Quote

I love the nazis too... by the way, I fucking cant get enough of the swastika, the SS, and the iron cross. Hitler and his head boys fucked up a few times and it cost them the war, but I love their beliefs and who they were, what they did, and what they wanted. I know that form of gov couldn't have lasted long once the human equation was brought in, but damnit it sure looked good.


You can also see he didn't even really understand the concept of natural selection, which apparently was the extent of his evolutionary vocabulary.  

Honesty compels me to divulge that I didn't bother watching the home videos he and Klebold made, so maybe I missed out on some eloquent, well-supported oral arguments about how evolutionary theory really did underpin the whole wretched plan, but I doubt it.  I prefer to take Harris at his word when it comes to assigning blame anyway:
       
Quote
I know I could get shot by a cop after only killing a single person, but hey guess the fuck WHAT! I chose to kill that one person so get over it! Its MY fault! not my parents, not my brothers, not my friends, not my favorite bands, not computer games, not the media. IT is MINE! go shut the fuck up!


Edited for formatting and to add:  Oh, yeah, and Klebold, the Nazi-loving Harris' partner-in-murder, was part Jewish and regularly attended a Lutheran church.  Figure that one out.

--------------
I wouldn't be bothered reading about the selfish gene because it has never been identified. -- Denyse O'Leary, professional moron
Again "how much". I don't think that's a good way to be quantitative.-- gpuccio

  
Jkrebs



Posts: 590
Joined: Sep. 2004

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2008,21:38   

Denyse speaks, but what does she mean?  Materialists can do no better than the story of Adam and Eve for explaining the origin of people because "people are people"?

Quote
Case in point: Apes are not people. Computers are not people. Cave men are not half people; they are just people with miserably basic, early technology. Only people are people.

Believe/don’t believe in Adam and Eve … but don’t anyone try telling me that there is a better materialist explanation out there. It just isn’t true.

I will have more to say on this.


Link

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2008,21:49   

Quote (Jkrebs @ Sep. 21 2008,22:38)
Denyse speaks, but what does she mean?  Materialists can do no better than the story of Adam and Eve for explaining the origin of people because "people are people"?
     
Quote
Case in point: Apes are not people. Computers are not people. Cave men are not half people; they are just people with miserably basic, early technology. Only people are people.

Believe/don’t believe in Adam and Eve … but don’t anyone try telling me that there is a better materialist explanation out there. It just isn’t true.

I will have more to say on this.

Link

Denyse and Mario in The Spatula Brain:
     
Quote
Lest there be any misunderstanding, it is not the purpose of this book to argue that evolution did not occur. There is a fossil record, after all. In spite of its many defects, the record shows that evolution occurred. Rather, the issue is whether human evolution is a fully naturalistic process that occurs without meaning, purpose, direction, or design in a fully materialist universe.... (p. 12)

But what about our nearest relatives, the chimpanzees and other large primates...Does the answer to human nature lie in our animal nature? In our kinship with chimpanzees? With mammals in general? (p. 13)

...Humans and chimpanzees are thought to have split off from a common ancestor about 5 to 7 million years ago, according to current evolutionary theory. Because chimps are the animal species closest to human beings...(p. 14)

So, evolution occurred. HUMAN evolution occurred. Human beings and chimpanzees share a common ancestor. Denyse and Mario said so.

So, what does she mean, indeed?

[edits to increase ridiculative pressures]

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
keiths



Posts: 2195
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2008,05:30   

GilTard poses a math problem with an exciting prize:
Quote

A Math Problem to Solve

I’m currently working on an as-yet-undisclosed computational algorithm for which I need to solve a math problem. I will send a free set of my three classical piano CDs (with works by Chopin, Liszt, Rachmaninoff, and Gershwin, along with program notes on the works and their composers) to anyone who can solve the following problem. (My e-mail can be found at the Evolutionary Informatics Lab on the People page.)

The sum of consecutive integers 1 to n (1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + … + n) is given by n(n+1)/2, or (n^2 + n)/2. n(n+1) will always be divisible by 2 since either n or n+1 must be even. Given a generating function, kn + p, where k is an interval and p is an initial offset, it is easy to calculate sums that skip numbers in regular intervals. For example, if we want to sum 3n + 2, for n = 1 to 4, we have 5 + 8 + 11 + 14, or (3+2 + 6+2 + 9+2 + 12+2), so we have one 3 plus 2, plus two 3’s plus 2, plus three 3’s plus 2, plus four 3’s plus 2, or 3(1 + 2 + 3 + 4) + four 2’s, or 3 times 10 plus 4 times 2. In general then, we have the formula k(n(n+1)/2) + np to find the sum for any generating function kn + p and a range of 1 to n.

I give this by way of background because I must find an analogous general formula for the sum of cubes. I need to sum cubes because Fermat’s Last Theorem tells us that there are no powers greater than 2 for which there are any integer solutions for a^n + b^n = c^n. I use the power of 3 because it’s the smallest power that guarantees that no two integers raised to the third power will ever sum to any other integer raised to the power of 3, which is a requirement of my algorithm.

Fortunately, there is a surprising and beautiful identity, which is that the sum of consecutive cubes of 1 to n (1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + 4^3 + … + n^3) is the sum of 1 to n, quantity squared — that is, (1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + … + n)^2, which equals (n(n+1)/2)^2. For example, 1 + 8 + 27 + 64 = (1 + 2 + 3 + 4)^2 = 100.

So, I need a formula for kn + p that will sum cubes in the same way that k(n(n+1)/2) + np sums numbers raised to the power of 1. In practice, p will be in the range of 0 to k-1, since p is the result of a modulo divide by k.

That convoluted and poorly expressed problem statement boils down to this:  
Quote
If the sum from m = 1 to n of (km + p) = k(n(n+1)/2) + np, then what is the sum from m = 1 to n of (km + p)^3?

Evidently Gil doesn't know how to cube the expression (km + p), or else he doesn't realize that he can cube it and sum the terms separately.  Even Granville Sewell has a hard time believing that Gil is asking such a stupid question:
Quote
B.T.W, if what you’re looking for is a formula for the sum from i=1 to i=n of (k*i+p)^3, I just e-mailed you that, you just cube it out and sum the i^3, i^2 and i terms. But I’m not sure if that’s what you wanted.


--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number. -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don't belong there and thoughts into my mind that don't belong there. -- KF

  
PTET



Posts: 133
Joined: Jan. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2008,05:51   

Quote
DaveScot
09/21/2008
5:45 pm

...I can’t really think of how to explain in simpler words that you might understand the irony in that Pharyngula mocks people for having religious belief in a savior while at the same time they stand up for Barack Obama who presents himself as a savior.

Yeah - because the two are exactly the same.

Way to go, DaveScot, trivializing Christianity, demeaning faith and imposing your opinions on everyone else. Why does Dembski put up with this? What does DaveScot have on him?

--------------
"It’s not worth the effort to prove the obvious. Ridiculous ideas don’t deserve our time.
Even the attempt to formulate ID is a generous accommodation." - ScottAndrews

   
CeilingCat



Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2008,06:47   

More on School Shooters, especially Harris and Klebold:
http://www.salon.com/books....ex.html

It's a review of a book called "Ceremonial Violence".  Excerpt:

Quote
After the Columbine massacre, an investigative commission found that the school, whose principal was a former coach, was rife with extreme, sadistic bullying on the part of student athletes. Teachers, even those who personally witnessed the bullying, rarely intervened; some claimed that to do so would have cost them their jobs. Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris, the Columbine shooters, were mercilessly tormented under this regime, as were any students who dared to associate with them. Fast observes that some sort of bullying is involved in nearly every case he examined in "Ceremonial Violence."

  
Spottedwind



Posts: 83
Joined: Aug. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2008,07:56   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Sep. 21 2008,08:54)
gpuccio still can't work out that research is not like reading the bible
     
Quote
Well, darwinists, like old timers in science fiction, seem to share an incredible amount of “sense of wonder”. There is almost no new relevant research paper which does not include words like “surprisingly”, “unexpectedly”,and similar.

This, to me, is just...he's takes a "sense of wonder", one of the greatest strengths (short of curiosity) a scientist can have...and turns it into a failing?

I think it's spectacular that new research papers have the terms "surprisingly", "unexpectedly" and the like.  No, not every paper is ground breaking and redefines its field, but small observations can lead to big discoveries or just a greater understanding.

I'm sorry, this just scrambles my brain and makes me type with the bad.  It just doesn't process that these are possibly bad things.

UD makes my brain hurt.

  
Advocatus Diaboli



Posts: 198
Joined: Nov. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2008,08:02   

So many banninations. Thinned ranks. Oh my. It seems someone will infiltrate UD in the form of a sockpuppet.



But when and how? That's a secret.

--------------
I once thought that I made a mistake, but I was wrong.

"I freely admit I’m a sociopath" - DaveScot

"Most importanly, the facts are on the side of ID." - scordova

"UD is the greatest website of all time." stevestory

   
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2008,08:08   

Quote (PTET @ Sep. 21 2008,10:06)
Quote (J-Dog @ Sep. 21 2008,09:51)
PTET - What happened to the icon you had that was a rare photograph of Jesus Holding The Dinosaur?

Jesus-with-the-baby-dinosaur was a bit of genius from Monty Propps at B3ta. Is Sarah Palin really too much? If so I'll try and find something more unsuitable. In the meantime, Rexella says hi.



Now, if anyone has any video of Denyse...

No, not really!  

I was just trying to have fun.  Your Palin-morph is actually very good!  

Thinks!

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
Bob O'H



Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2008,08:26   

Quote (olegt @ Sep. 21 2008,18:25)
Quote
For the record I regret the loss of BobOH. He’s two faced, snarky, and not very bright but still represents the cream of the crop amongst our critics and I’d welcome him back.

Let DaveTard apologize for this comment first.  Then decline the invitation.

Oh, no.  I'll accept the invitation.  I'm playing a slightly different game.

I guess I should thank sparc for putting pressure on Dave to have me back.

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
Zachriel



Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2008,08:45   

Quote (Advocatus Diaboli @ Sep. 22 2008,08:02)
So many banninations. Thinned ranks. Oh my. It seems someone will infiltrate UD in the form of a sockpuppet.



But when and how? That's a secret.

Equipment check:

Shoe phone. Check.
Cigarette lighter .22 caliber. Check.
Absorbo-pills to soak up alcohol. Check.
Inflato-girl. Check.
Clean sock. Check.
Suction cups overshoes. Check.
Lapel flower with goof-gas. Check.
Plastic lips. Check.

--------------

You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

   
carlsonjok



Posts: 3326
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2008,09:02   

Quote (Bob O'H @ Sep. 22 2008,08:26)
 
Quote (olegt @ Sep. 21 2008,18:25)
 
Quote
For the record I regret the loss of BobOH. He’s two faced, snarky, and not very bright but still represents the cream of the crop amongst our critics and I’d welcome him back.

Let DaveTard apologize for this comment first.  Then decline the invitation.

Oh, no.  I'll accept the invitation.  I'm playing a slightly different game.

I presume the game is subtler than just being Dave's token dancing Darwinist?



--------------
It's natural to be curious about our world, but the scientific method is just one theory about how to best understand it.  We live in a democracy, which means we should treat every theory equally. - Steven Colbert, I Am America (and So Can You!)

  
Bob O'H



Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2008,11:45   

Quote (carlsonjok @ Sep. 22 2008,09:02)
 
Quote (Bob O'H @ Sep. 22 2008,08:26)
   
Quote (olegt @ Sep. 21 2008,18:25)
     
Quote
For the record I regret the loss of BobOH. He’s two faced, snarky, and not very bright but still represents the cream of the crop amongst our critics and I’d welcome him back.

Let DaveTard apologize for this comment first.  Then decline the invitation.

Oh, no.  I'll accept the invitation.  I'm playing a slightly different game.

I presume the game is subtler than just being Dave's token dancing Darwinist?


Any game is subtler than that.

Well, except perhaps American Football.  As someone once (approximately) observed - 10 seconds of mindless violence followed by a minute of committee meetings.

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
Skullboy



Posts: 24
Joined: Sep. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2008,12:15   

Dodgen definitely suffers from slide rule envy. From what I can gather, he is a bright programmer, but not actually an engineer by training.

This sophomoric attempt to show off what he thinks is mathematical depth reminds me of this post from a while back. In it he launches into an elaborate description of binary search algorithms, a matter which is only tangentially related to the issue under discussion.

But of course, deliberately confusing levels of abstraction when discussing computer simulations is one of the most-used tools in the ID toolbox. If you can sound really technical while doing it, the sycophants will all go "oooh" and "ahhh."

  
carlsonjok



Posts: 3326
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2008,12:37   

Quote (Bob O'H @ Sep. 22 2008,11:45)
   
Quote (carlsonjok @ Sep. 22 2008,09:02)
     
Quote (Bob O'H @ Sep. 22 2008,08:26)

Oh, no.  I'll accept the invitation.  I'm playing a slightly different game.

I presume the game is subtler than just being Dave's token dancing Darwinist?

Any game is subtler than that.

Well, I am not sure that actually answers the question, but I'll have to trust you know what you are doing.  ;)

Nonetheless, I will mock you anyways. HA HA THIS IS DAVE AND YOU



--------------
It's natural to be curious about our world, but the scientific method is just one theory about how to best understand it.  We live in a democracy, which means we should treat every theory equally. - Steven Colbert, I Am America (and So Can You!)

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2008,14:12   

ahhh, the Ryman....

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Jkrebs



Posts: 590
Joined: Sep. 2004

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2008,20:29   

StephenB writes at UD:

Quote
If ID is committed to following where the evidence leads, it can’t make a prior commitment to an old earth.


Quoted here.

One of the things that gets me about StephenB is how - this is hard to describe - enamored he is of his belief that logic, "self-evident truths", and other bits of abstract reasoning can just impose themselves on reality.

Witness the above statement, to which I'd like to reply:

Stephen, no one has a "prior commitment" to an old earth.  The vast, vast majority of the world's scientists who know anything about this, including those from the past couple of centuries, believe that the earth is old because of the evidence!  For you to argue that the ID movement can't or shouldn't whole-heartedly accept this fact because, conceivably, the YEC's might be right, is stupid.

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2008,22:20   

Davetard imagines himself some sort of counterweight to Oprah:

Quote


5

DaveScot

09/21/2008

5:45 pm

Robbie

It looked fair and balanced to me. Those clips of Obama from CNN and FoxNews coverage look authentic to me.

Propaganda? You bet. If Oprah can, for the first time, endorse a presidential candidate (Obama) I don’t see why we can’t, for the first time, endorse a presidential candidate (McCain) too. You know what they say - what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

I can’t really think of how to explain in simpler words that you might understand the irony in that Pharyngula mocks people for having religious belief in a savior while at the same time they stand up for Barack Obama who presents himself as a savior.


http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....kaloons

   
  14997 replies since July 17 2008,19:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (500) < ... 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]