RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (527) < ... 238 239 240 241 242 [243] 244 245 246 247 248 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 5, Return To Teh Dingbat Buffet< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Glen Davidson



Posts: 1100
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 07 2016,12:28   

Dense:

Quote
Indeed. One way of seeing the matter is that the internet empowers almost everybody, including trolls, windbags, fiends, and cranks.


Yes.  Yes it does.

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
Glen Davidson



Posts: 1100
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 07 2016,14:17   

Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 06 2016,23:35)
i know he published that one thing elsewhere, but he left for good?

He came back in the comments shortly after his review was pulled, KF responding and trying to sound friendly and all.  But I haven't seen anything from him at UD since that time.

He's posted twice at TSZ recently, this today

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 07 2016,14:56   

Quote (Glen Davidson @ Oct. 07 2016,15:17)
Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 06 2016,23:35)
i know he published that one thing elsewhere, but he left for good?

He came back in the comments shortly after his review was pulled, KF responding and trying to sound friendly and all.  But I haven't seen anything from him at UD since that time.

He's posted twice at TSZ recently, this today

Glen Davidson

I saw him over at TSZ. I thought about getting an account there cuz UD is so dead, but haven't gotten around to checking it out much.

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 07 2016,17:19   

WJM from the ceiling:
Quote
7
rvb8October 6, 2016 at 6:19 pm
(I’m not interested in putting up with your inane, uninformed nonsense on this thread, rvb8. Run along. – WJM)

Followed shortly by this from WJM:
Quote
Leave it to BA77 to flesh out the thesis. Thanks, BA!

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 07 2016,17:48   

Quote
24
rvb8October 6, 2016 at 11:19 pm
A post quoting me to which I am not aloud to reply.
Hmmm.

UDEditors: RV, you need to work on your reading comprehension. You are indeed “allowed” to reply as much as you wish. You are not allowed to troll the thread. Now it may be that you simply cannot help yourself and your compulsion to troll is uncontrollable. If that is the case, and for you “replying” and “trolling” are always the same thing, then you are correct; you are not allowed to reply. If that is not the case, feel free to reply as much as you like.

Quote

25
rvb8October 7, 2016 at 4:27 pm
Really editor?
Paraphrasing; ‘If only you would remain on topic. If only your trolling could be reigned in. If only you would stop taunting.’

No. No. And No! Try this. If only your arbitrariness could be predicted. If only we could exclude quotes from the KJB on topics dealing with science. If only the nastiness exhibited towards my posts could be equally judged.

I introduced the idea on this thread that ID advocates view OOL studies and SETI in a similar light; both a waste of time, I drew an equivalency. In what way is that trollish, or off topic?

Kairos who seems able to practice Biblical exegesis at will, anywhere, at any time, is judged to be ‘on topic’?

You don’t have to hide your ‘banning’ behind the cloak of reasonableness.


lol

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 07 2016,19:54   

Quote
12
OrigenesOctober 7, 2016 at 4:28 am
Thank you for sharing your profound insight Bornagain77.


Origenes, you are disqualified from communicating in any fashion.
Quote

13
AxelOctober 7, 2016 at 6:05 pm
Another primordial, though mysteriously veiled, truism, identified with embarrassing clarity by William J Murray ! Another ace.

No wonder all the great paradigm-changers were all instinctively, and consciously by the light of elementary reasoning, unambiguous ID partisans !

Also, as Origenes intimated, another apologetics match-winner of a post by BA77.

This whole site has been ‘on a roll’ lately, freed from the demeaning, because inevitably fruitless, mentoring of atheist naifs, who ‘fancy their barrow’ against Christian apologetics – until it all gets a little too much for them.


crack is a helluva drug.

   
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 07 2016,20:02   

Quote
I introduced the idea on this thread that ID advocates view OOL studies and SETI in a similar light; both a waste of time, I drew an equivalency.

Really. While SETI does strike me as a long shot*, OOL is an attempt to understand something that we know happened, in some manner or other. (After all, life is here now, and there was a time when it wasn't here. )

*(Who knows if anything was within range of our detection back when it emitted signals that would be getting here now or in the near future. )

  
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 07 2016,20:04   

Quote
No wonder all the great paradigm-changers were all instinctively, and consciously by the light of elementary reasoning,

They reasoned about chemistry? :p

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 07 2016,23:16   

Quote
237
mike1962October 7, 2016 at 9:41 pm
daves,

In the real world, the only identity that holds up to the identity…

A + A = A

… is if A = 0

Which effectively means that in the real world alpha null is equivalent to zero or nothing.


Ooooooo! In 'The Real World' God what a bunch of dipthongs.

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 08 2016,23:39   

Quote
18
BrianFraserOctober 8, 2016 at 10:31 pm
What part of DNA codes for shapes? What encodes the shape and length and location of a bone? What encodes facial features?

Doesn’t DNA code for things besides proteins?

Just wondering.
lol

   
OgreMkV



Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 09 2016,08:42   

Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 08 2016,23:39)
Quote
18
BrianFraserOctober 8, 2016 at 10:31 pm
What part of DNA codes for shapes? What encodes the shape and length and location of a bone? What encodes facial features?

Doesn’t DNA code for things besides proteins?

Just wondering.
lol

Tell me some ID supporter tried to answer this...

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
CeilingCat



Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 09 2016,19:17   

Careful what you wish for.  First, WD400 gives a partial answer:    
Quote
19 wd400
October 8, 2016 at 10:59 pm

Hi Brian,

The shape and length of bones are encoded in DNA… through protein coding genes (and functional RNAs) and through the regulation of gene expression. The details are pretty complex, but something like the action of FGF and WNT proteins in limb buds should give you and idea how these processes work.

Then, the tardeluge:

20 Dionisio
October 9, 2016 at 1:02 am

BrianFraser @18:

Excellent questions.

However, the answer you got @19 is incomplete at the best.

Let’s suppose you don’t know much about music. One day you listen to Beethoven’s 9th Symphony and ask how is that music produced? The answer you got @19 is analogous to saying that there is an orchestra that uses sheet music and several instruments.

That wouldn’t answer your question, would it?
You would expect a better explanation, wouldn’t you?

The sentence @19 “The details are pretty complex…” is a gross understatement.

The real thing is complex complexity on steroids. The final picture is not ready yet. Don’t let anyone fool you.

For example, check this out:

http://www.uncommondescent.com.....ent-618792/....-61....-618792

If we pay attention to details, any biology research paper we read may provoke a series of “how?” and “why?” questions.

Perhaps sometimes those fundamental questions are overlooked.

All we need is to recover the sense of wonder we had when we were children.

Keep asking questions. The more, the better.

Don’t worry if a professor from the U of T in Canada says that you don’t ask honest questions. Actually, that would be a nice compliment.

21 Origenes
October 9, 2016 at 1:33 am

Brian Faser #18,

Brian Faser: What part of DNA codes for shapes? What encodes the shape and length and location of a bone? What encodes facial features?
Doesn’t DNA code for things besides proteins?

I have asked very similar questions to Larry Moran and wd400:

If most of our genome is junk, then where is the information stored for the (adult) body plan? Where is the information stored for e.g. the brain? And where is the information stored for how to build all this?

Their answers:

Larry Moran: …. experts do not see a need to encode body plans and brain in our genome …

wd400: If it is not clear enough, there is no over-arching “plan” in the genome. There are genes, that have regulatory elements, which produce gene produces respond to environments and influence other genes and so on and so on.

Eric Anderson summarized their position as follows:

Eric Anderson: … this thread may have uncovered at least one aspect of the simplistic thinking that leads a person to believe that most DNA is junk.
After all, the thinking goes, all we need to do is specify some parts in the DNA and the machine will build itself all by chemistry. It’s easy! No plan needed. No program required. Just specify some gene products and we’re done. Everything else is probably just junk.
Amazing what chemistry can do.

– – –

A more principled problem for neo-Darwinism (and neutral theory) is that DNA is simply at the wrong level to organize things.
In his book ‘Darwin’s Doubt’, Stephen Meyer offers the following analogies:

At a construction site, builders will make use of many materials: lumber, wires, nails, drywall, piping, and windows. Yet building materials do not determine the floor plan of the house or the arrangement of houses in a neighborhood. Similarly, electronic circuits are composed of many components, such as resistors, capacitors, and transistors. But such lower-level components do not determine their own arrangement in an integrated circuit ….
In a similar way, DNA does not by itself direct how individual proteins are assembled into these larger systems or structures—cell types, tissues, organs, and body plans—during animal development.

“Detailed information at the level of the gene does not serve to explain form.” [Müller and Newman, “Origination of Organismal Form,” 8]

There's lots more and even PaV tries his hand, but I can't inflict any more of this on an innocent world.

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 09 2016,23:57   

Oh Hell, I can't let these fine examples of IDthought go by:        
Quote
27 PaV
October 9, 2016 at 11:39 am

>>wd400:

>>Sure, though of course my perspective in this case has the advantage of being informed by reality.

Isn’t also possible, if not likely, that this “informed” position is a disadvantage since it is filled with presuppositions that go unchallenged? It was not an “informed” and “knowledgeable” adult who told the Emperor that he had no clothes, but a simple child.

>>You’ll have to provide details about how gene-centric view blinkered doctors and scientists from studying chromosomes in cancer, or indeed what progress might have been made with the technologies available to researchers when they were so blinkered if they’d focused on chormosomes instead of genes.

No, I don’t. You can look for the information yourself. I’m quoting authors who have studied the field and written papers. Just look around.

28 wd400
October 9, 2016 at 1:52 pm

So it’s dangerous to be knowledgeable, and you have no intention of providing evidence to support your claims?

29 PaV
October 9, 2016 at 5:39 pm

So your game is to put words into my mouth?

And you’re too lazy to look things up?

I think PaV demonstrates the heart and soul of IDthought in 27.  Knowledge is dangerous.  People who actually understand the science are "likely" to be either incredibly stupid buffoons, like the emperor, or scheming syncophants, liars and cheats like his courtiers.

Only someone with an uneducated child-like ignorance can see the truth of ID.

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 10 2016,11:39   

Quote
Trump goes nuke:
October 9, 2016 Posted by kairosfocus under Evolutionary materialism's amorality, General interest, governance, Lessons of History, Politics/policy and origins issues, Science, worldview issues/foundations and society
5 Comments

” . . . you would be in jail.”
(Details and vids here, with earlier discussion here and onward.)

The pivotal issue relevant to UD here, is not whether either major candidate is of any great promise (on evidence in hand I stand by my view, no . . . ), but instead, the revelation of utter media bias and manipulation. The issue, then becomes, how do we stand against the tide of a civilisational march of folly, complete with agit prop agendas dressed up in lab coats?

How does this speak to preserving a modicum of sanity and respect for facts and logic in discussion of serious issues; often in the face of all sorts of agit prop or trollish distractions, with the future of our civilisation obviously in the stakes?

Let me add, issues like this:


Whatever the answer, to actually keep our heads when a civilisation is patently going mad all around us, is going to be hard.

Very hard.

But, we gotta try. END


SO SCIENCE

   
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 10 2016,12:02   

Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 10 2016,09:39)
Quote
Trump goes nuke:
October 9, 2016 Posted by kairosfocus under Evolutionary materialism's amorality, General interest, governance, Lessons of History, Politics/policy and origins issues, Science, worldview issues/foundations and society
5 Comments

” . . . you would be in jail.”
(Details and vids here, with earlier discussion here and onward.)

The pivotal issue relevant to UD here, is not whether either major candidate is of any great promise (on evidence in hand I stand by my view, no . . . ), but instead, the revelation of utter media bias and manipulation. The issue, then becomes, how do we stand against the tide of a civilisational march of folly, complete with agit prop agendas dressed up in lab coats?

How does this speak to preserving a modicum of sanity and respect for facts and logic in discussion of serious issues; often in the face of all sorts of agit prop or trollish distractions, with the future of our civilisation obviously in the stakes?

Let me add, issues like this:


Whatever the answer, to actually keep our heads when a civilisation is patently going mad all around us, is going to be hard.

Very hard.

But, we gotta try. END


SO SCIENCE

I see the Montserrat Toy Shop got another consignment of model battleships.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 10 2016,12:10   

Quote (JohnW @ Oct. 10 2016,12:02)
Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 10 2016,09:39)
Quote
Trump goes nuke:
October 9, 2016 Posted by kairosfocus under Evolutionary materialism's amorality, General interest, governance, Lessons of History, Politics/policy and origins issues, Science, worldview issues/foundations and society
5 Comments

” . . . you would be in jail.”
(Details and vids here, with earlier discussion here and onward.)

The pivotal issue relevant to UD here, is not whether either major candidate is of any great promise (on evidence in hand I stand by my view, no . . . ), but instead, the revelation of utter media bias and manipulation. The issue, then becomes, how do we stand against the tide of a civilisational march of folly, complete with agit prop agendas dressed up in lab coats?

How does this speak to preserving a modicum of sanity and respect for facts and logic in discussion of serious issues; often in the face of all sorts of agit prop or trollish distractions, with the future of our civilisation obviously in the stakes?

Let me add, issues like this:


Whatever the answer, to actually keep our heads when a civilisation is patently going mad all around us, is going to be hard.

Very hard.

But, we gotta try. END


SO SCIENCE

I see the Montserrat Toy Shop got another consignment of model battleships.

Greenland still looks safe.

  
Texas Teach



Posts: 2084
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 10 2016,15:51   

Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 10 2016,11:39)
Quote
Trump goes nuke:
October 9, 2016 Posted by kairosfocus under Evolutionary materialism's amorality, General interest, governance, Lessons of History, Politics/policy and origins issues, Science, worldview issues/foundations and society
5 Comments

” . . . you would be in jail.”
(Details and vids here, with earlier discussion here and onward.)

The pivotal issue relevant to UD here, is not whether either major candidate is of any great promise (on evidence in hand I stand by my view, no . . . ), but instead, the revelation of utter media bias and manipulation. The issue, then becomes, how do we stand against the tide of a civilisational march of folly, complete with agit prop agendas dressed up in lab coats?

How does this speak to preserving a modicum of sanity and respect for facts and logic in discussion of serious issues; often in the face of all sorts of agit prop or trollish distractions, with the future of our civilisation obviously in the stakes?

Let me add, issues like this:


Whatever the answer, to actually keep our heads when a civilisation is patently going mad all around us, is going to be hard.

Very hard.

But, we gotta try. END


SO SCIENCE

Fortunately, Gordo is no more an eligible U.S. voter than he is a scientist.

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 10 2016,21:07   

Quote
24
QueriusOctober 10, 2016 at 7:16 pm
rvb8,
Quote

As to my non-response to your absurd hypothetical. No, I won’t eat babies.

Ah, so you admit the tissue involved in abortion are “babies.”
Quote

You say I have no moral basis with which to back up that position? Try this, ‘It’s wrong to eat babies.’

But this is just unwanted, unaware, lifeless hominid protein that you’re insisting is wrong for starving people to eat. Leopards commonly prey on hominids for food. Is it “wrong” for them to do so?

Or is it just wrong for you and OK for anyone else who has a different preference? Do you have a problem with thinly sliced baby sushi being sold at stores?

What right do you have in making the blanket statement above that “eating babies is wrong”? Are you God?

-Q


they're always confused about why people don't do psychotic things.

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 11 2016,01:25   

Quote
25
rvb8October 10, 2016 at 10:29 pm
“Ah, so you admit the tissue involved in abortion are “babies.”

No, it’s fetal tissue, and I wouldn’t eat that either and for the same reason.

‘Q’, pay attention to the suffering of the living, and less to those you think are fully human, but will not become individuals. If you spent half the time and effort worrying about homeless, unwanted ‘real’ children, you might make it to the moral area we atheists occupy.

That’s it! Bye!


putatively permanent link to comment

   
KevinB



Posts: 525
Joined: April 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 11 2016,02:51   

Quote (Texas Teach @ Oct. 10 2016,15:51)
Fortunately, Gordo is no more an eligible U.S. voter than he is a scientist.

This assertion overstates his scientific credentials.

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 11 2016,10:55   

enjoy this trip down memory lane:

Quote
Posted by: DaveScot | September 4, 2008 5:49 PM

You finally got one right, PZ. This IS how you will lose.

Even totally united behind Gore in 2000 and Kerry in 2004 you couldn't beat a dumbass draft dodging reborn alcoholic George "Shrub" Bush and his snake-oil sidekick Dick Cheney of all people. That's pretty pathetic. This round you've got an even worse candidate that half of your own party thinks stole the nomination by cheating and dirty politics. Your party is shattered up the middle and you have the worst candidate in all the decades I've been paying attention. I knew Jack Kennedy and your nominee, PZ, is no Jack Kennedy.

Now the culture war is still on, the players are all the same on both sides, except this time we have an honest-to-God centrist war hero, even if he is an elitist beltway insider, and a little unheard of cutie, obviously a political savant, who in 30 minutes won the hearts and minds of every heretofore apathetic God fearing blue collar flyover family all across the nation and made them start caring about who wins this election not to mention is stealing a lot of the Hillary voters who wanted nothing more than a woman in the Whitehouse. If McCain wins then Palin, sooner or later, is going to become the first woman president of the United States as by the time she's up for election to the top spot there won't be any question of lack of experience. You are basically looking at teh American Margaret Thatcher. Get used to her. She's going to be in your face for the next 16 years. It's all over except for the tears and anger from your side that you were fucked yet again. Write that down.
link

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 11 2016,11:13   

Trailer for new film on biochemist Michael Behe: Revolutionary

lol

   
KevinB



Posts: 525
Joined: April 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 11 2016,11:44   

Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 11 2016,11:13)
Trailer for new film on biochemist Michael Behe: Revolutionary

lol

Or in jurisdictions where the original title is deemed to be promoting jihad, "The Spin Doctor".

  
Bob O'H



Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 11 2016,12:17   

Quote (KevinB @ Oct. 11 2016,11:44)
Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 11 2016,11:13)
Trailer for new film on biochemist Michael Behe: Revolutionary

lol

Or in jurisdictions where the original title is deemed to be promoting jihad, "The Spin Doctor".

He's Shane Warne?

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
KevinB



Posts: 525
Joined: April 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 11 2016,14:04   

Quote (Bob O'H @ Oct. 11 2016,12:17)
 
Quote (KevinB @ Oct. 11 2016,11:44)
 
Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 11 2016,11:13)
Trailer for new film on biochemist Michael Behe: Revolutionary

lol

Or in jurisdictions where the original title is deemed to be promoting jihad, "The Spin Doctor".

He's Shane Warne?

Only if he's at silly mid off.

  
timothya



Posts: 280
Joined: April 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 11 2016,14:41   

Quote (KevinB @ Oct. 11 2016,14:04)
Quote (Bob O'H @ Oct. 11 2016,12:17)
   
Quote (KevinB @ Oct. 11 2016,11:44)
   
Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 11 2016,11:13)
Trailer for new film on biochemist Michael Behe: Revolutionary

lol

Or in jurisdictions where the original title is deemed to be promoting jihad, "The Spin Doctor".

He's Shane Warne?

Only if he's at silly mid off.

Nowadays he is Australia's finest advertisement for hair implants.

--------------
"In its majestic equality, the law forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal loaves of bread." Anatole France

  
Cubist



Posts: 558
Joined: Oct. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 11 2016,17:51   

Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 11 2016,11:13)
Trailer for new film on biochemist Michael Behe: Revolutionary

lol

Remarkably, there were only three comments on that YouTube video when I browsed it.

I felt the need to leave a fourth, pointing out the gaping flaw in Behe's IC needs a designer argument from Darwin's Black Box. We shall see how, or if, Behe's defenders respond to my comment.

  
Glen Davidson



Posts: 1100
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 11 2016,22:19   

I guess Behe fits ok with Lenin, Stalin, and Trotsky as a revolutionary.  More of a reactionary in truth, still he speaks for an ideology that could never make it in a free marketplace of ideas, hence would end up censoring science and teaching propaganda like many revolutionaries did (whether or not he'd be inclined to do so himself).

The Cause is all important, the truth barely, if at all.  Typical 20th-century revolutionary, or any ID reactionary.

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 11 2016,23:19   

Quote
31
Truth Will Set You FreeOctober 11, 2016 at 10:16 am
bornagain77 @ 29: Don’t ever worry about what rvb8 says. He is a swine…and you know the saying about casting pearls before swine.


swine!

   
Ptaylor



Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 11 2016,23:31   

Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 12 2016,16:19)
 
Quote
31
Truth Will Set You FreeOctober 11, 2016 at 10:16 am
bornagain77 @ 29: Don’t ever worry about what rvb8 says. He is a swine…and you know the saying about casting pearls before swine.


swine!

Nice reply though:
 
Quote
32
rvb8October 11, 2016 at 5:49 pm

TWSYF,
“he is a swine.”

Thank you, have a nice day.

Ha

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
  15792 replies since Dec. 29 2013,11:01 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (527) < ... 238 239 240 241 242 [243] 244 245 246 247 248 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]