RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (501) < ... 486 487 488 489 490 [491] 492 493 494 495 496 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 3, The Beast Marches On...< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
paragwinn



Posts: 539
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 20 2011,22:26   

Quote (Seversky @ Aug. 20 2011,16:16)
That's right.  F/Ns to F/Ns to F/Ns etc.

The whole thing is F/N ridiculous.

Sig-worthy

ETA: mine emphasis

--------------
All women build up a resistance [to male condescension]. Apparently, ID did not predict that. -Kristine 4-19-11
F/Ns to F/Ns to F/Ns etc. The whole thing is F/N ridiculous -Seversky on KF footnote fetish 8-20-11
Sigh. Really Bill? - Barry Arrington

  
paragwinn



Posts: 539
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 20 2011,23:01   

Quote (George @ Aug. 20 2011,16:57)
Poe Zoe needs to dial it down a bit.

I can't tell where Zoe's lips end and where KF's backside begins (I know, brain bleach).

Zoe's undercover surveillence technique is reminiscent of Inspector Clouseau's assisted by Professor Auguste Balls (loved that peg-legged pirate with an inflatable parrot).

--------------
All women build up a resistance [to male condescension]. Apparently, ID did not predict that. -Kristine 4-19-11
F/Ns to F/Ns to F/Ns etc. The whole thing is F/N ridiculous -Seversky on KF footnote fetish 8-20-11
Sigh. Really Bill? - Barry Arrington

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 20 2011,23:38   

Quote (paragwinn @ Aug. 20 2011,23:01)
Quote (George @ Aug. 20 2011,16:57)
Poe Zoe needs to dial it down a bit.

I can't tell where Zoe's lips end and where KF's backside begins (I know, brain bleach).

Zoe's undercover surveillence technique is reminiscent of Inspector Clouseau's assisted by Professor Auguste Balls (loved that peg-legged pirate with an inflatable parrot).

More like Chief Inspector Charles Dreyfus, as Dreyfus was insane and Clouseau always (eventually) got his man.

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2011,00:02   

Q:  
Quote (Patrick @ Aug. 20 2011,14:05)
Could we be about to see the rare eat-your-own-young banning?

A:  
Quote
18
Barry ArringtonAugust 20, 2011 at 8:57 pm

Sadly, Ilion is no longer with us.

And, on another thread
 
Quote
10
Barry ArringtonAugust 20, 2011 at 8:59 pm

Sadly (because he often had a lot of intelligent things to say) Ilion is no longer with us.


--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
sparc



Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2011,00:23   

Quote (Seversky @ Aug. 20 2011,18:16)
Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Aug. 20 2011,17:49)
Lewontin. At the end of the quote Gordo adds:
     
Quote
[And those who have swallowed the "that's quote-mined" talking point and imagine the the immediately following words JUSTIFY the just cited, should read on through the notes and further cites at the just above link.]

Pathetic bastard. There is a kind of crazy logic to it however. If he patches each of his talking points in response to legitimate objections he must be zooming down quite quickly at the fractal level with some of them.

That's right.  F/Ns to F/Ns to F/Ns etc.

The whole thing is F/N ridiculous.

KF's logic is far behind where christian logic has already been centuries ago: God designed beavers as fish to broaden opportunities during the lenten season. I'll have some ad hominem soaked beaver with FSCI/CSI/FIaSCO word salad covered with Lewontin sauce a la Gordon E Mullings.

--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
JohnK



Posts: 13
Joined: Mar. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2011,00:35   

Quote (Seversky @ Aug. 20 2011,08:26)
DeNews, the gift that keeps on giving:
     
Quote
Beavers illustrate complex specified information, they don’t author it.

First Things 107 (November 2000): 23-31
William A. Dembski
:
"Consider beaver dams. They are not the product of human intelligence nor are they the product of Darwinian causes, but we are not ignorant of their causes. Beaver intelligence is responsible for beaver dams.
"So my theory [of CSI] works well for nonhuman design as well. But what if Prof. Arnhart admits that beavers and even extraterrestrials can be detectable designers, but that my method cannot detect an immaterial designer--that if no material or embodied agent can be found for some effect, we have to plead ignorance?"


Densye vs. Dembski ...Fighters Begin!

  
sparc



Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2011,02:46   

Is Zoe the one Zoe of Barbados Underground fame?

--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
sparc



Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2011,05:04   

Quote (Seversky @ Aug. 20 2011,21:39)
Tea's up!

(I prefer it to coffee, with or without the exclamation mark)

Shocking Revelations at Uncommon Descent!

Leading ID proponent Gil Dodgen reveals he was once an atheist!

Again.

And again

And again.

     
Quote
What a fool I was


Still are, Gil, still are.

In his own words:
Quote
As many UD readers know, I was once a Richard Dawkins-style atheist. I was not just an ordinary, garden-variety atheist, but a really obnoxious, nasty, self-aggrandizing, pathetically prideful atheist like Dawkins. I prided myself in using my intellectual capacities in an attempt to destroy any belief that materialism cannot explain everything.
Personalities don't change much: Besides having turned into not just an ordinary, garden-variety christian, but a really obnoxious, nasty, self-aggrandizing, pathetically prideful christian he still is still the same GilDodgen priding himself in using his intellectual capacities in an attempt to destroy any remaining signs of sanity.

--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
Woodbine



Posts: 1218
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2011,06:02   

Is it particular to religious converts that they feel the need to retell their 'journey' at every opportunity? Or is it confined to the narcissistic twits like Gil?

Nobody here believes a word he says about his pre-Christian 'militant' atheism and I suspect these immutable mantras serve to erect a kind of pre-larval 'Anti-Dodgen'; a pantomime version of his former self that helps focus his energies and provide justification for his new stance.

  
JLT



Posts: 740
Joined: Jan. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2011,06:30   

Quote (sparc @ Aug. 21 2011,11:04)
 
Quote (Seversky @ Aug. 20 2011,21:39)
Tea's up!

(I prefer it to coffee, with or without the exclamation mark)

Shocking Revelations at Uncommon Descent!

Leading ID proponent Gil Dodgen reveals he was once an atheist!

Again.

And again

And again.

         
Quote
What a fool I was


Still are, Gil, still are.

In his own words:
   
Quote
As many UD readers know, I was once a Richard Dawkins-style atheist. I was not just an ordinary, garden-variety atheist, but a really obnoxious, nasty, self-aggrandizing, pathetically prideful atheist like Dawkins. I prided myself in using my intellectual capacities in an attempt to destroy any belief that materialism cannot explain everything.
Personalities don't change much: Besides having turned into not just an ordinary, garden-variety christian, but a really obnoxious, nasty, self-aggrandizing, pathetically prideful christian he still is still the same GilDodgen priding himself in using his intellectual capacities in an attempt to destroy any remaining signs of sanity.

Some time ago I've read somewhere that especially born again Christians quite commonly claim that their life had been really really dreadful before they were born again. They were told that once they're born again they'd become different persons, all their sins washed away, they'd walk with Jesus in their hearts, yadda yadda. And they might even feel that way for a time but inevitably, reality sets in and they realise that they're still the same as before. So, either they weren't really born again, or the whole thing is bunkum.
In order to escape this conclusion they exaggerate every little "bad" thing they did before they were born again to make it a terrible vice. Someone who smoked a joint once was a drug addict, someone who took a paperclip home from work was a thief, someone who occasionally watched porn on the internet didn't do anything else and destroyed his life with it, and someone who just didn't believe in (that special brand of) god was a flaming atheist. Just to make their "conversion" sound as life-changing as its supposed to be.
Whenever I read one of GilD's "I was an atheist once" stories I'm slightly amused because he's trying so hard. I'm pretty sure that, if at all, he was an atheist because he hadn't been brought up to be a Christian and never thought about it one way or the other.

ETA: After some googling I found this:
Quote
Awhile back ago, I had heard a very disturbing statistic. The statistic was that 50% of all newborn Christians were dropping out of their walks with the Lord within the very first year after they had just been saved. [...]
There thus can be no question that with all of these benefits and blessings, that the gift of eternal salvation through Jesus Christ has to be the greatest experience any of us can have down here on this earth. So if that is really the case – then how can you logically explain such a disturbing statistic? How can this many newborns be dropping out of this most incredible experience within the first year or two after initially getting saved?

Were they ever really saved in the first place?[...]
But this statistic is telling us that there might be something wrong with some of these salvation experiences. A 50% dropout rate is simply too high of a number for something that is so powerful to be so easily discarded.[...]
If you look very closely at the wording of the Scripture verses I will list below, and then examine some of the ways in which some of these newborns are being saved – you will quickly discover that there may be a missing ingredient in some of their salvation experiences. [...]
This one, key, missing ingredient may be the word “repentance.” [...]
To repent means that you are willing to turn from the sins you have been living in. It means to have a change of heart and a change of mind. However, you cannot be willing to turn from the sins you have been living in unless you have full realization that these are sins in the first place and that you are a sinner in need of a Savior!

If you think some of your sins are not really sins – then you will see no need to receive any forgiveness for your sins through Jesus and His death on the cross.

In other words, you can't be born again if you haven't been a really big sinner before. If there aren't any big sins for you to repent, you better make some up.

--------------
"Random mutations, if they are truly random, will affect, and potentially damage, any aspect of the organism, [...]
Thus, a realistic [computer] simulation [of evolution] would allow the program, OS, and hardware to be affected in a random fashion." GilDodgen, Frilly shirt owner

  
Seversky



Posts: 442
Joined: June 2010

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2011,11:55   

DeNews occasionally gets close to being right - sort of.

 
Quote
The Brit riots: “When churches disappear, the vacuum is filled by gangs or tribes.”

Although it's actually commentator Michael Coren she's quoting.

Churches do function as a sort of social glue which helps bind communities together and make them more resilient under stress.  And yes, in the absence of churches, human beings, being a social species, will tend to gather into other groups formed on different bases.

What she doesn't realize she and Coren are saying is that religions are just a bigger type of gang.  They may not riot for a couple of nights and loot plasma TVs and trainers when they get bored but when they do have a beef with a rival 'gang' it tends to be a lot bigger and a lot bloodier and goes on for a lot longer - witness the Troubles in Northern Ireland or the Thirty Years War or the Crusades.

So instead of a huffy 'told you so' to British society, a little Christian humility in face of 'pot, kettle, black' religious conflicts down the centuries would not go amiss.

  
JLT



Posts: 740
Joined: Jan. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2011,16:03   

Quote (Seversky @ Aug. 21 2011,17:55)
DeNews occasionally gets close to being right - sort of.

         
Quote
The Brit riots: “When churches disappear, the vacuum is filled by gangs or tribes.”

Although it's actually commentator Michael Coren she's quoting.

Churches do function as a sort of social glue which helps bind communities together and make them more resilient under stress.  And yes, in the absence of churches, human beings, being a social species, will tend to gather into other groups formed on different bases.

What she doesn't realize she and Coren are saying is that religions are just a bigger type of gang.  They may not riot for a couple of nights and loot plasma TVs and trainers when they get bored but when they do have a beef with a rival 'gang' it tends to be a lot bigger and a lot bloodier and goes on for a lot longer - witness the Troubles in Northern Ireland or the Thirty Years War or the Crusades.

So instead of a huffy 'told you so' to British society, a little Christian humility in face of 'pot, kettle, black' religious conflicts down the centuries would not go amiss.

The more important point IMO is that correlation is not causation. The decline of religious observance didn't cause this riots and it is questionable whether it made a difference anyway. The Spanish youth protested as well and riots very similar to the British happened in Greece in 2008:
   
Quote
This week’s violence was on an unprecedented scale. It erupted after Alexandros Grigoropoulos, a 15-year-old schoolboy, was shot dead by a policeman in Exarchia, a scruffy central district of Athens known as the anarchists’ home base, on the night of December 6th. Shouting insults at police in their patrol cars is a weekend sport for some Athenian youths. The police are meant to stay cool: the last time a policeman killed a teenager was in 1985.

This time protests over the shooting quickly spilled into the main streets of Athens, and thence across the country. Roving groups of anarchists torched cars, broke shop windows decorated for Christmas and tossed in petrol bombs. Beyond the capital, demonstrators attacked police stations and public offices in a dozen cities.

The pent-up anger of Greece’s youth, matched by the anarchists’ taste for mayhem, triggered five nights of riots, causing damage estimated at more than €100m ($130m).

(Source: The Economist)

Both Spain and Greece have much higher church attendance and religious observance than the UK.

ETA: Greece is among the most religious countries in Europe.

ETA2: The Greek riots in A NYTimes article (Seems that it IS possible to report about it without calling everyone anarchists every second sentence)

--------------
"Random mutations, if they are truly random, will affect, and potentially damage, any aspect of the organism, [...]
Thus, a realistic [computer] simulation [of evolution] would allow the program, OS, and hardware to be affected in a random fashion." GilDodgen, Frilly shirt owner

  
khan



Posts: 1554
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2011,17:52   

Quote (Seversky @ Aug. 20 2011,22:39)
Tea's up!

(I prefer it to coffee, with or without the exclamation mark)

Shocking Revelations at Uncommon Descent!

Leading ID proponent Gil Dodgen reveals he was once an atheist!

Again.

And again

And again.

 
Quote
What a fool I was


Still are, Gil, still are.

And he ate babies and free-based kittens (or was it the other way around?).

--------------
"It's as if all those words, in their hurry to escape from the loony, have fallen over each other, forming scrambled heaps of meaninglessness." -damitall

That's so fucking stupid it merits a wing in the museum of stupid. -midwifetoad

Frequency is just the plural of wavelength...
-JoeG

  
khan



Posts: 1554
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2011,17:59   

Quote (Woodbine @ Aug. 21 2011,07:02)
Is it particular to religious converts that they feel the need to retell their 'journey' at every opportunity? Or is it confined to the narcissistic twits like Gil?

Nobody here believes a word he says about his pre-Christian 'militant' atheism and I suspect these immutable mantras serve to erect a kind of pre-larval 'Anti-Dodgen'; a pantomime version of his former self that helps focus his energies and provide justification for his new stance.

Just from what I have read on line for ~30 years: I have observed that tales of converted atheists/UFO abductees/victims of Satanic cults/... tend to end up as some sort of competition

--------------
"It's as if all those words, in their hurry to escape from the loony, have fallen over each other, forming scrambled heaps of meaninglessness." -damitall

That's so fucking stupid it merits a wing in the museum of stupid. -midwifetoad

Frequency is just the plural of wavelength...
-JoeG

  
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2011,18:50   

Quote (khan @ Aug. 21 2011,15:59)
Quote (Woodbine @ Aug. 21 2011,07:02)
Is it particular to religious converts that they feel the need to retell their 'journey' at every opportunity? Or is it confined to the narcissistic twits like Gil?

Nobody here believes a word he says about his pre-Christian 'militant' atheism and I suspect these immutable mantras serve to erect a kind of pre-larval 'Anti-Dodgen'; a pantomime version of his former self that helps focus his energies and provide justification for his new stance.

Just from what I have read on line for ~30 years: I have observed that tales of converted atheists/UFO abductees/victims of Satanic cults/... tend to end up as some sort of competition

Heh. The Four Yorkshiremen of the Apocalypse.

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
sledgehammer



Posts: 533
Joined: Sep. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2011,20:30   

Quote (fnxtr @ Aug. 21 2011,16:50)
Heh. The Four Yorkshiremen of the Apocalypse.



--------------
The majority of the stupid is invincible and guaranteed for all time. The terror of their tyranny is alleviated by their lack of consistency. -A. Einstein  (H/T, JAD)
If evolution is true, you could not know that it's true because your brain is nothing but chemicals. ?Think about that. -K. Hovind

  
paragwinn



Posts: 539
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2011,20:41   

For your weekend entertainment: O'Leary's Morality Tales For Atheists
(Rated 'R' for Adult Language and Extreme Violence)
Quote
To illustrate the point, I asked readers to imagine – and this is no idle imagining – the rise to social power of an ignorant and violent sect that vastly outnumbers the virtuous, animal-loving Atheists’ League. (The sect holds that cats are unclean and that kicking them is a virtue.) The problem for the atheist then becomes how to sustain himself in the face of persecution.
Quote
You see – bear with me – the sect discussed earlier is headed by the Supreme Holy Interpreter for the Terror. (The Terror is the sect’s deity.) Because the head’s title is a bit, well, voluminous, let us abbreviate it to [SHIT]head.
Quote
Imagine their dismay when they learned that [SHIT]head had had a revelation some years ago from The Terror – sex purifies children.
Quote
one  fellow allowed it to be known that the best trajectory for reversal would be that of a bullet through SHIT’s head  to forestall any further revelations from The Terror.

Now, now, Denyse, you know God doesnt like naughty language, in acronym form or otherwise. (Unless, of course, you received special dispensation from the Pope)

ETA: bolding mine

--------------
All women build up a resistance [to male condescension]. Apparently, ID did not predict that. -Kristine 4-19-11
F/Ns to F/Ns to F/Ns etc. The whole thing is F/N ridiculous -Seversky on KF footnote fetish 8-20-11
Sigh. Really Bill? - Barry Arrington

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2011,21:38   

Well, I'm just trying to figure out what the fuck she's trying to say.

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
REC



Posts: 638
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2011,22:29   

So in O'Leary's fantasyland, there is an atheist organization that:

1) Believes in a deity- "The Terror is the sect’s deity"
2) Has a Supreme leader, a representative of that deity  
   on Earth whose word is absolute-the "Supreme Holy
   Interpreter for the Terror"
3) Has issues with its treatment of women
4) Has pedophilia issues
5) Has resorted to violence and coercion to defend its dogma

Is this the Catholic Church she's taking about? Projection much?

  
paragwinn



Posts: 539
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2011,00:07   

Quote (REC @ Aug. 21 2011,20:29)
So in O'Leary's fantasyland, there is an atheist organization that:

1) Believes in a deity- "The Terror is the sect’s deity"
2) Has a Supreme leader, a representative of that deity  
   on Earth whose word is absolute-the "Supreme Holy
   Interpreter for the Terror"
3) Has issues with its treatment of women
4) Has pedophilia issues
5) Has resorted to violence and coercion to defend its dogma

Is this the Catholic Church she's taking about? Projection much?

Actually, the fantasy atheists have a separate organization labelled 'Atheist League' (not to be confused with League of Atheists, United Atheists, Atheist Cabal, or the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine Atheists)

--------------
All women build up a resistance [to male condescension]. Apparently, ID did not predict that. -Kristine 4-19-11
F/Ns to F/Ns to F/Ns etc. The whole thing is F/N ridiculous -Seversky on KF footnote fetish 8-20-11
Sigh. Really Bill? - Barry Arrington

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2011,04:36   

Quote (paragwinn @ Aug. 22 2011,08:07)
Quote (REC @ Aug. 21 2011,20:29)
So in O'Leary's fantasyland, there is an atheist organization that:

1) Believes in a deity- "The Terror is the sect’s deity"
2) Has a Supreme leader, a representative of that deity  
   on Earth whose word is absolute-the "Supreme Holy
   Interpreter for the Terror"
3) Has issues with its treatment of women
4) Has pedophilia issues
5) Has resorted to violence and coercion to defend its dogma

Is this the Catholic Church she's taking about? Projection much?

Actually, the fantasy atheists have a separate organization labelled 'Atheist League' (not to be confused with League of Atheists, United Atheists, Atheist Cabal, or the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine Atheists)

HOMO SPLITTER!!!

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2011,05:07   

Quote (Seversky @ Aug. 20 2011,08:58)
 
Quote (Texas Teach @ Aug. 20 2011,08:49)
   
Quote (Seversky @ Aug. 20 2011,08:26)
DeNews, the gift that keeps on giving:
       
Quote
Beavers illustrate complex specified information, they don’t author it.


Well, I suppose that depends on the beaver...

A quick perusal of the interwebs reveals lots of information authored about beavers.  Much of it in visual form.  I'm sure Gordon Mullings could point out lots of it.

True.  I'm guessing Gordon has little direct access to beavers so he relies on the 'Net to keep him abreast of the latest research...


The Beaver as an Unintelligent Designer

  
JLT



Posts: 740
Joined: Jan. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2011,05:18   

This is insane. If I understand DO'L correctly, she believes that immoral people who became atheists because they didn't want to be judged make up the majority of atheists. The friendly atheists who might act morally (presumably by accident or because they do not understand what atheism means) are in the minority. So, if the immoral majority of atheists starts kicking cats and abusing children, the friendly atheists can't do anything about it, because they really have no grounds on which they can say that cat-kicking and child abuse is wrong.
So far that's merely inane. The insane part is this:
Quote
Those who  live through the beginnings of some of this do not think  it fiction.

What?

Is there an atheist organisation that favours kicking cats that I don't know of?

--------------
"Random mutations, if they are truly random, will affect, and potentially damage, any aspect of the organism, [...]
Thus, a realistic [computer] simulation [of evolution] would allow the program, OS, and hardware to be affected in a random fashion." GilDodgen, Frilly shirt owner

  
JLT



Posts: 740
Joined: Jan. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2011,06:19   

I would like DO'L to discuss with her bretherens at UD whether exclusion of women from priesthood is morally right or wrong. As there is only one objectively correct answer to this, easily derived from the bible or from the Holy Spirit (or possibly from stone tablets; I don't know exactly how that works), this should be a very short discussion.

--------------
"Random mutations, if they are truly random, will affect, and potentially damage, any aspect of the organism, [...]
Thus, a realistic [computer] simulation [of evolution] would allow the program, OS, and hardware to be affected in a random fashion." GilDodgen, Frilly shirt owner

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2011,07:27   

I would like tranmaw to drink bleach with her brethrens at UD, then run headlong into traffic and try to plank the yellow line.  but that probly says more about me than atheists

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2011,07:48   

Quote (Seversky @ Aug. 20 2011,19:16)
Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Aug. 20 2011,17:49)
Lewontin. At the end of the quote Gordo adds:
     
Quote
[And those who have swallowed the "that's quote-mined" talking point and imagine the the immediately following words JUSTIFY the just cited, should read on through the notes and further cites at the just above link.]

Pathetic bastard. There is a kind of crazy logic to it however. If he patches each of his talking points in response to legitimate objections he must be zooming down quite quickly at the fractal level with some of them.

That's right.  F/Ns to F/Ns to F/Ns etc.

The whole thing is F/N ridiculous.

+10000000

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
JLT



Posts: 740
Joined: Jan. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2011,12:22   

Scootle
Quote
So Genie and the Glasgow skeptics are taking on Global Warming ‘denial’ too? Funny how these ‘skeptics’ always side with the scientific establishment.

How foolish of those "skeptics"! Instead of accepting the scientific consensus they should instead cherry pick the data or just make them up completely, misinterpret and quotemine scientific research and climatologists, and just plain lie if everything else fails! That's real scepticism!

--------------
"Random mutations, if they are truly random, will affect, and potentially damage, any aspect of the organism, [...]
Thus, a realistic [computer] simulation [of evolution] would allow the program, OS, and hardware to be affected in a random fashion." GilDodgen, Frilly shirt owner

  
Nils Ruhr



Posts: 42
Joined: Nov. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2011,12:50   

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....olution
   
Quote
Here’s a mathematician, MarkCC, author of the blog “Good Math, Bad Math.” {http://goodmath.blogspot.com/2006/03/king-of-bad-math-dembskis-bad.html}

What’s his expertise? Math. What does he say about Dembski’s mathematics?

“he’s actually a decent mathematician”

What is not his expertise? Computer science. What does he say in the domain of computer science?

???
According to MarkCC's profile he's a PhD computer scientist.  
http://scientopia.org/blogs......-markcc

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2011,13:29   

Quote (Ptaylor @ Aug. 21 2011,21:38)
Well, I'm just trying to figure out what the fuck she's trying to say.

Looks like someone read Ayn Rand's Anthem while having a little too much coffee with her saccharine.

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2011,13:35   

Quote (khan @ Aug. 21 2011,23:52)
Quote (Seversky @ Aug. 20 2011,22:39)
Tea's up!

(I prefer it to coffee, with or without the exclamation mark)

Shocking Revelations at Uncommon Descent!

Leading ID proponent Gil Dodgen reveals he was once an atheist!

Again.

And again

And again.

 
Quote
What a fool I was


Still are, Gil, still are.

And he ate babies and free-based kittens (or was it the other way around?).

You can't free base a kitten, don't be ridiculous. Puppies on the other hand....

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
  15001 replies since Sep. 04 2009,16:20 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (501) < ... 486 487 488 489 490 [491] 492 493 494 495 496 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]