Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > Joe G.'s Tardgasm

Pages: (919) < ... 487 488 489 490 491 [492] 493 494 495 496 497 ... >

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:14    Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:12) [quote=Joe G,April 24 2018,19:58] Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:56) Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:53)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:42)       Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:37)         Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:36)           Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:28)           Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:26)             Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:14) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki......._effect               Quote If a planet's atmosphere contains radiatively active gases (i.e., greenhouse gases) they will radiate energy in all directions. Part of this radiation is directed towards the surface, warming it.[3] The intensity of the downward radiation – that is, the strength of the greenhouse effect – will depend on the atmosphere's temperature and on the amount of greenhouse gases that the atmosphere contains. Exactly what I have been saying. You fuckers are total assholes. The really really really simple bit you are missing bird brain is the temperature of the atmosphere affects (impacts) the Earth's surface and ocean temperatures through convection. Please explain how I am missing that. Or shut the fuck up           Quote Joke: "CO2 cannot act as a blanket unless the all of the re-emitted energy is focused back towards earth. And even then that re-emitted energy is limited in range. So it really doesn't help you. The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." Please explain......         Quote The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." ....actually don't bother Joe that is comedy gold. It's even better than frequency = wavelength. If it doesn't reach the earth it cannot warm it. And seeing that the earth is radiating more heat than the CO2 re-emits how can the CO2's emissions warm it? Psst...hey dumbass... When the CO2 re-emits its energy does it warm the surrounding oxygen, nitrogen, argon etc. molecules in the atmosphere? Do those molecules mix with the entire atmosphere and provide more energy / increase the temperature of the whole thing? Christ you're an ignorant dumbass. LoL! CO2 emits the same wavelength as it absorbs. So only if oxygen, nitrogen, argon, etc. are greenhouse gasses with the same absorption spectra, then no, the re-emitted energy will not affect them. However the energized CO2 does bump into those other molecules causing it to lose some of its energy. That is why when that energy is re-emitted is less than what was absorbed. Christ you really are too stupid to understand conservation of energy Every day you get a little dumber. So the earth is an isolated system, is it? 5 watt Walkie-talkie signals race around the earth, do they? Well actually they can Joe. Check this out. WSPRNET Most of those comms are made on 5 Watts of TX power. Why? They are reflected from the Ionosphere often on multiple hops between the high atmosphere and the earths surface. Because Joe? Try doing something for yourself for once. Where does it say 5 watts? -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:15    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:13) Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:09)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:02)     Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:54)         Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:53)         Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:37) And seeing that the earth is radiating more heat than the CO2 re-emits how can the CO2's emissions warm it? The extra CO2 radiates back to Earth a portion of the energy which otherwise would be radiated into space.   More energy = higher temperature of the planet. Try to get those two chubby neurons firing at the same time Joke.  TRY. What? So if I add a heat source of say 70 degrees to a room that is already 80, are you saying the room is going to get warmer? Really? Hey dumbfuck the Earth's average surface temperature is 13 deg. C The Earth's average atmospheric temperature is 16 deg. C What will happen to the average surface temperature when the average atmospheric temperature rises due to addition CO2 re-radiation of energy? Willfully ignorant dumbass. The CO2 gets its LWR from the surface. The additional CO2 returns some of that LWR back to the surface instead of allowing it to radiate into space. Less energy lost = more energy retained = warmer planet. I don't think anyone can crack Joke's Shield of Impenetrable Ignorance.   :D Very little energy ever makes it back to the surface. There isn't enough CO2 to make a difference -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:16    Thermodynamics- heat flows from hot to cold. The CO2 gets its LWR from the surface. How does a cooler surface transfer its heat to a hotter atmosphere? Show your work -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:18    Let's try a really easy one for the dumbass. Hey Joke, how does putting a blanket over yourself on a cold night keep you warmer than no blanket? -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:19    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:18) Let's try a really easy one for the dumbass. Hey Joke, how does putting a blanket over yourself on a cold night keep you warmer than no blanket? CO2 isn't like a blanket, moron. Blankets don't allow 92% of the body heat to escape. And blankets have more material than 400 parts per million -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:20    Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:12) [quote=Joe G,April 24 2018,19:58] Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:56) Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:53)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:42)       Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:37)         Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:36)           Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:28)           Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:26)             Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:14) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki......._effect               Quote If a planet's atmosphere contains radiatively active gases (i.e., greenhouse gases) they will radiate energy in all directions. Part of this radiation is directed towards the surface, warming it.[3] The intensity of the downward radiation – that is, the strength of the greenhouse effect – will depend on the atmosphere's temperature and on the amount of greenhouse gases that the atmosphere contains. Exactly what I have been saying. You fuckers are total assholes. The really really really simple bit you are missing bird brain is the temperature of the atmosphere affects (impacts) the Earth's surface and ocean temperatures through convection. Please explain how I am missing that. Or shut the fuck up           Quote Joke: "CO2 cannot act as a blanket unless the all of the re-emitted energy is focused back towards earth. And even then that re-emitted energy is limited in range. So it really doesn't help you. The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." Please explain......         Quote The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." ....actually don't bother Joe that is comedy gold. It's even better than frequency = wavelength. If it doesn't reach the earth it cannot warm it. And seeing that the earth is radiating more heat than the CO2 re-emits how can the CO2's emissions warm it? Psst...hey dumbass... When the CO2 re-emits its energy does it warm the surrounding oxygen, nitrogen, argon etc. molecules in the atmosphere? Do those molecules mix with the entire atmosphere and provide more energy / increase the temperature of the whole thing? Christ you're an ignorant dumbass. LoL! CO2 emits the same wavelength as it absorbs. So only if oxygen, nitrogen, argon, etc. are greenhouse gasses with the same absorption spectra, then no, the re-emitted energy will not affect them. However the energized CO2 does bump into those other molecules causing it to lose some of its energy. That is why when that energy is re-emitted is less than what was absorbed. Christ you really are too stupid to understand conservation of energy Every day you get a little dumber. So the earth is an isolated system, is it? 5 watt Walkie-talkie signals race around the earth, do they? Well actually they can Joe. Check this out. WSPRNET Most of those comms are made on 5 Watts of TX power. Why? They are reflected from the Ionosphere often on multiple hops between the high atmosphere and the earths surface. Because Joe? Try doing something for yourself for once. The cool thong about DX is that the person you are trying to contact 10 miles away cannot hear you. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:20    Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:09) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:02) Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:54)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:53)     Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:37) And seeing that the earth is radiating more heat than the CO2 re-emits how can the CO2's emissions warm it? The extra CO2 radiates back to Earth a portion of the energy which otherwise would be radiated into space.   More energy = higher temperature of the planet. Try to get those two chubby neurons firing at the same time Joke.  TRY. What? So if I add a heat source of say 70 degrees to a room that is already 80, are you saying the room is going to get warmer? Really? Hey dumbfuck the Earth's average surface temperature is 13 deg. C The Earth's average atmospheric temperature is 16 deg. C What will happen to the average surface temperature when the average atmospheric temperature rises due to addition CO2 re-radiation of energy? Willfully ignorant dumbass. Thermodynamics- heat flows from hot to cold. The CO2 gets its LWR from the surface. How does a cooler surface transfer its heat to a hotter atmosphere? Show your work You show your work moron. Start here Solar Irradiance -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:21    Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:20) Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:09) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:02)   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:54)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:53)       Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:37) And seeing that the earth is radiating more heat than the CO2 re-emits how can the CO2's emissions warm it? The extra CO2 radiates back to Earth a portion of the energy which otherwise would be radiated into space.   More energy = higher temperature of the planet. Try to get those two chubby neurons firing at the same time Joke.  TRY. What? So if I add a heat source of say 70 degrees to a room that is already 80, are you saying the room is going to get warmer? Really? Hey dumbfuck the Earth's average surface temperature is 13 deg. C The Earth's average atmospheric temperature is 16 deg. C What will happen to the average surface temperature when the average atmospheric temperature rises due to addition CO2 re-radiation of energy? Willfully ignorant dumbass. Thermodynamics- heat flows from hot to cold. The CO2 gets its LWR from the surface. How does a cooler surface transfer its heat to a hotter atmosphere? Show your work You show your work moron. Start here Solar Irradiance And? -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:22    Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:20) [quote=k.e..,April 24 2018,12:12] Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:58) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:56)   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:53)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:42)       Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:37)         Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:36)           Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:28)             Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:26)             Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:14) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki......._effect               Quote If a planet's atmosphere contains radiatively active gases (i.e., greenhouse gases) they will radiate energy in all directions. Part of this radiation is directed towards the surface, warming it.[3] The intensity of the downward radiation – that is, the strength of the greenhouse effect – will depend on the atmosphere's temperature and on the amount of greenhouse gases that the atmosphere contains. Exactly what I have been saying. You fuckers are total assholes. The really really really simple bit you are missing bird brain is the temperature of the atmosphere affects (impacts) the Earth's surface and ocean temperatures through convection. Please explain how I am missing that. Or shut the fuck up             Quote Joke: "CO2 cannot act as a blanket unless the all of the re-emitted energy is focused back towards earth. And even then that re-emitted energy is limited in range. So it really doesn't help you. The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." Please explain......           Quote The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." ....actually don't bother Joe that is comedy gold. It's even better than frequency = wavelength. If it doesn't reach the earth it cannot warm it. And seeing that the earth is radiating more heat than the CO2 re-emits how can the CO2's emissions warm it? Psst...hey dumbass... When the CO2 re-emits its energy does it warm the surrounding oxygen, nitrogen, argon etc. molecules in the atmosphere? Do those molecules mix with the entire atmosphere and provide more energy / increase the temperature of the whole thing? Christ you're an ignorant dumbass. LoL! CO2 emits the same wavelength as it absorbs. So only if oxygen, nitrogen, argon, etc. are greenhouse gasses with the same absorption spectra, then no, the re-emitted energy will not affect them. However the energized CO2 does bump into those other molecules causing it to lose some of its energy. That is why when that energy is re-emitted is less than what was absorbed. Christ you really are too stupid to understand conservation of energy Every day you get a little dumber. So the earth is an isolated system, is it? 5 watt Walkie-talkie signals race around the earth, do they? Well actually they can Joe. Check this out. WSPRNET Most of those comms are made on 5 Watts of TX power. Why? They are reflected from the Ionosphere often on multiple hops between the high atmosphere and the earths surface. Because Joe? Try doing something for yourself for once. The cool thong about DX is that the person you are trying to contact 10 miles away cannot hear you. It also blows your pea brain argument out of the water. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:23    Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:22) [quote=Joe G,April 24 2018,20:20] Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:12) Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:58)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:56)   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:53)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:42)         Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:37)           Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:36)             Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:28)             Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:26)               Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:14) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki......._effect                 Quote If a planet's atmosphere contains radiatively active gases (i.e., greenhouse gases) they will radiate energy in all directions. Part of this radiation is directed towards the surface, warming it.[3] The intensity of the downward radiation – that is, the strength of the greenhouse effect – will depend on the atmosphere's temperature and on the amount of greenhouse gases that the atmosphere contains. Exactly what I have been saying. You fuckers are total assholes. The really really really simple bit you are missing bird brain is the temperature of the atmosphere affects (impacts) the Earth's surface and ocean temperatures through convection. Please explain how I am missing that. Or shut the fuck up             Quote Joke: "CO2 cannot act as a blanket unless the all of the re-emitted energy is focused back towards earth. And even then that re-emitted energy is limited in range. So it really doesn't help you. The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." Please explain......           Quote The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." ....actually don't bother Joe that is comedy gold. It's even better than frequency = wavelength. If it doesn't reach the earth it cannot warm it. And seeing that the earth is radiating more heat than the CO2 re-emits how can the CO2's emissions warm it? Psst...hey dumbass... When the CO2 re-emits its energy does it warm the surrounding oxygen, nitrogen, argon etc. molecules in the atmosphere? Do those molecules mix with the entire atmosphere and provide more energy / increase the temperature of the whole thing? Christ you're an ignorant dumbass. LoL! CO2 emits the same wavelength as it absorbs. So only if oxygen, nitrogen, argon, etc. are greenhouse gasses with the same absorption spectra, then no, the re-emitted energy will not affect them. However the energized CO2 does bump into those other molecules causing it to lose some of its energy. That is why when that energy is re-emitted is less than what was absorbed. Christ you really are too stupid to understand conservation of energy Every day you get a little dumber. So the earth is an isolated system, is it? 5 watt Walkie-talkie signals race around the earth, do they? Well actually they can Joe. Check this out. WSPRNET Most of those comms are made on 5 Watts of TX power. Why? They are reflected from the Ionosphere often on multiple hops between the high atmosphere and the earths surface. Because Joe? Try doing something for yourself for once. The cool thong about DX is that the person you are trying to contact 10 miles away cannot hear you. It also blows your pea brain argument out of the water. How? Do CO2s' re-emissions bounce off of the ionosphere? -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:23    Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:19)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:18) Let's try a really easy one for the dumbass. Hey Joke, how does putting a blanket over yourself on a cold night keep you warmer than no blanket? CO2 isn't like a blanket, moron. Blankets don't allow 92% of the body heat to escape. And blankets have more material than 400 parts per million Do blankets retain some heat or not? Which will be warmer, a system which loses 100% of its emitted LWR energy or a system which loses only 92% of its LWR energy? Is 8% more than or less than 0%? Get those chubby brain cells working Joke! -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:24    Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:21) Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:20) Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:09)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:02)   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:54)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:53)       Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:37) And seeing that the earth is radiating more heat than the CO2 re-emits how can the CO2's emissions warm it? The extra CO2 radiates back to Earth a portion of the energy which otherwise would be radiated into space.   More energy = higher temperature of the planet. Try to get those two chubby neurons firing at the same time Joke.  TRY. What? So if I add a heat source of say 70 degrees to a room that is already 80, are you saying the room is going to get warmer? Really? Hey dumbfuck the Earth's average surface temperature is 13 deg. C The Earth's average atmospheric temperature is 16 deg. C What will happen to the average surface temperature when the average atmospheric temperature rises due to addition CO2 re-radiation of energy? Willfully ignorant dumbass. Thermodynamics- heat flows from hot to cold. The CO2 gets its LWR from the surface. How does a cooler surface transfer its heat to a hotter atmosphere? Show your work You show your work moron. Start here Solar Irradiance And? And you made another mistake. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:24    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:23) Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:19)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:18) Let's try a really easy one for the dumbass. Hey Joke, how does putting a blanket over yourself on a cold night keep you warmer than no blanket? CO2 isn't like a blanket, moron. Blankets don't allow 92% of the body heat to escape. And blankets have more material than 400 parts per million Do blankets retain some heat or not? Which will be warmer, a system which loses 100% of its emitted LWR energy or a system which loses only 92% of its LWR energy? Is 8% more than or less than 0%? Get those chubby brain cells working Joke! It losses all of it eventually. Mornings are colder than the day before. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:25    Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:23) [quote=k.e..,April 24 2018,12:22] Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:20) Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:12)   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:58)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:56)     Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:53)         Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:42)         Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:37)           Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:36)             Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:28)               Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:26)               Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:14) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki......._effect                 Quote If a planet's atmosphere contains radiatively active gases (i.e., greenhouse gases) they will radiate energy in all directions. Part of this radiation is directed towards the surface, warming it.[3] The intensity of the downward radiation – that is, the strength of the greenhouse effect – will depend on the atmosphere's temperature and on the amount of greenhouse gases that the atmosphere contains. Exactly what I have been saying. You fuckers are total assholes. The really really really simple bit you are missing bird brain is the temperature of the atmosphere affects (impacts) the Earth's surface and ocean temperatures through convection. Please explain how I am missing that. Or shut the fuck up               Quote Joke: "CO2 cannot act as a blanket unless the all of the re-emitted energy is focused back towards earth. And even then that re-emitted energy is limited in range. So it really doesn't help you. The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." Please explain......             Quote The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." ....actually don't bother Joe that is comedy gold. It's even better than frequency = wavelength. If it doesn't reach the earth it cannot warm it. And seeing that the earth is radiating more heat than the CO2 re-emits how can the CO2's emissions warm it? Psst...hey dumbass... When the CO2 re-emits its energy does it warm the surrounding oxygen, nitrogen, argon etc. molecules in the atmosphere? Do those molecules mix with the entire atmosphere and provide more energy / increase the temperature of the whole thing? Christ you're an ignorant dumbass. LoL! CO2 emits the same wavelength as it absorbs. So only if oxygen, nitrogen, argon, etc. are greenhouse gasses with the same absorption spectra, then no, the re-emitted energy will not affect them. However the energized CO2 does bump into those other molecules causing it to lose some of its energy. That is why when that energy is re-emitted is less than what was absorbed. Christ you really are too stupid to understand conservation of energy Every day you get a little dumber. So the earth is an isolated system, is it? 5 watt Walkie-talkie signals race around the earth, do they? Well actually they can Joe. Check this out. WSPRNET Most of those comms are made on 5 Watts of TX power. Why? They are reflected from the Ionosphere often on multiple hops between the high atmosphere and the earths surface. Because Joe? Try doing something for yourself for once. The cool thong about DX is that the person you are trying to contact 10 miles away cannot hear you. It also blows your pea brain argument out of the water. How? Do CO2s' re-emissions bounce off of the ionosphere? You drew the parallel moron. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:25    Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:24) Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:21) Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:20)   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:09)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:02)     Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:54)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:53)         Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:37) And seeing that the earth is radiating more heat than the CO2 re-emits how can the CO2's emissions warm it? The extra CO2 radiates back to Earth a portion of the energy which otherwise would be radiated into space.   More energy = higher temperature of the planet. Try to get those two chubby neurons firing at the same time Joke.  TRY. What? So if I add a heat source of say 70 degrees to a room that is already 80, are you saying the room is going to get warmer? Really? Hey dumbfuck the Earth's average surface temperature is 13 deg. C The Earth's average atmospheric temperature is 16 deg. C What will happen to the average surface temperature when the average atmospheric temperature rises due to addition CO2 re-radiation of energy? Willfully ignorant dumbass. Thermodynamics- heat flows from hot to cold. The CO2 gets its LWR from the surface. How does a cooler surface transfer its heat to a hotter atmosphere? Show your work You show your work moron. Start here Solar Irradiance And? And you made another mistake. That is your unsupported opinion. The earth does not warm an atmosphere that is already warmer than the earth. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:25    Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:24) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:23)   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:19)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:18) Let's try a really easy one for the dumbass. Hey Joke, how does putting a blanket over yourself on a cold night keep you warmer than no blanket? CO2 isn't like a blanket, moron. Blankets don't allow 92% of the body heat to escape. And blankets have more material than 400 parts per million Do blankets retain some heat or not? Which will be warmer, a system which loses 100% of its emitted LWR energy or a system which loses only 92% of its LWR energy? Is 8% more than or less than 0%? Get those chubby brain cells working Joke! It losses all of it eventually. Mornings are colder than the day before. You dodged the question Joke. Which will be warmer, a system which loses 100% of its emitted LWR energy or a system which loses only 92% of its LWR energy? -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:26    Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:25) [quote=Joe G,April 24 2018,20:23] Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:22) Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:20)   Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:12)   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:58)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:56)     Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:53)         Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:42)           Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:37)             Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:36)               Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:28)               Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:26)                 Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:14) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki......._effect                   Quote If a planet's atmosphere contains radiatively active gases (i.e., greenhouse gases) they will radiate energy in all directions. Part of this radiation is directed towards the surface, warming it.[3] The intensity of the downward radiation – that is, the strength of the greenhouse effect – will depend on the atmosphere's temperature and on the amount of greenhouse gases that the atmosphere contains. Exactly what I have been saying. You fuckers are total assholes. The really really really simple bit you are missing bird brain is the temperature of the atmosphere affects (impacts) the Earth's surface and ocean temperatures through convection. Please explain how I am missing that. Or shut the fuck up               Quote Joke: "CO2 cannot act as a blanket unless the all of the re-emitted energy is focused back towards earth. And even then that re-emitted energy is limited in range. So it really doesn't help you. The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." Please explain......             Quote The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." ....actually don't bother Joe that is comedy gold. It's even better than frequency = wavelength. If it doesn't reach the earth it cannot warm it. And seeing that the earth is radiating more heat than the CO2 re-emits how can the CO2's emissions warm it? Psst...hey dumbass... When the CO2 re-emits its energy does it warm the surrounding oxygen, nitrogen, argon etc. molecules in the atmosphere? Do those molecules mix with the entire atmosphere and provide more energy / increase the temperature of the whole thing? Christ you're an ignorant dumbass. LoL! CO2 emits the same wavelength as it absorbs. So only if oxygen, nitrogen, argon, etc. are greenhouse gasses with the same absorption spectra, then no, the re-emitted energy will not affect them. However the energized CO2 does bump into those other molecules causing it to lose some of its energy. That is why when that energy is re-emitted is less than what was absorbed. Christ you really are too stupid to understand conservation of energy Every day you get a little dumber. So the earth is an isolated system, is it? 5 watt Walkie-talkie signals race around the earth, do they? Well actually they can Joe. Check this out. WSPRNET Most of those comms are made on 5 Watts of TX power. Why? They are reflected from the Ionosphere often on multiple hops between the high atmosphere and the earths surface. Because Joe? Try doing something for yourself for once. The cool thong about DX is that the person you are trying to contact 10 miles away cannot hear you. It also blows your pea brain argument out of the water. How? Do CO2s' re-emissions bounce off of the ionosphere? You drew the parallel moron. And you choked on it, dipshit -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:26    Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:24) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:23) Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:19)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:18) Let's try a really easy one for the dumbass. Hey Joke, how does putting a blanket over yourself on a cold night keep you warmer than no blanket? CO2 isn't like a blanket, moron. Blankets don't allow 92% of the body heat to escape. And blankets have more material than 400 parts per million Do blankets retain some heat or not? Which will be warmer, a system which loses 100% of its emitted LWR energy or a system which loses only 92% of its LWR energy? Is 8% more than or less than 0%? Get those chubby brain cells working Joke! It losses all of it eventually. Mornings are colder than the day before. If there was no carbon dioxide in the atmosphere the whole earth would be a snowball. That's the point twit. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

stevestory Posts: 13407 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:27    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,13:18) Let's try a really easy one for the dumbass. Hey Joke, how does putting a blanket over yourself on a cold night keep you warmer than no blanket? It doesn't make you any warmer because all the blanket molecules would have to be Pointed in the Rite Direction!

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:27    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:25) Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:24)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:23)   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:19)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:18) Let's try a really easy one for the dumbass. Hey Joke, how does putting a blanket over yourself on a cold night keep you warmer than no blanket? CO2 isn't like a blanket, moron. Blankets don't allow 92% of the body heat to escape. And blankets have more material than 400 parts per million Do blankets retain some heat or not? Which will be warmer, a system which loses 100% of its emitted LWR energy or a system which loses only 92% of its LWR energy? Is 8% more than or less than 0%? Get those chubby brain cells working Joke! It losses all of it eventually. Mornings are colder than the day before. You dodged the question Joke. Which will be warmer, a system which loses 100% of its emitted LWR energy or a system which loses only 92% of its LWR energy? It all depends, dipshit. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:28    Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:26) Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:24) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:23)   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:19)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:18) Let's try a really easy one for the dumbass. Hey Joke, how does putting a blanket over yourself on a cold night keep you warmer than no blanket? CO2 isn't like a blanket, moron. Blankets don't allow 92% of the body heat to escape. And blankets have more material than 400 parts per million Do blankets retain some heat or not? Which will be warmer, a system which loses 100% of its emitted LWR energy or a system which loses only 92% of its LWR energy? Is 8% more than or less than 0%? Get those chubby brain cells working Joke! It losses all of it eventually. Mornings are colder than the day before. If there was no carbon dioxide in the atmosphere the whole earth would be a snowball. That's the point twit. Bullshit -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:29    Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:27)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:25)   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:24)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:23)       Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:19)         Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:18) Let's try a really easy one for the dumbass. Hey Joke, how does putting a blanket over yourself on a cold night keep you warmer than no blanket? CO2 isn't like a blanket, moron. Blankets don't allow 92% of the body heat to escape. And blankets have more material than 400 parts per million Do blankets retain some heat or not? Which will be warmer, a system which loses 100% of its emitted LWR energy or a system which loses only 92% of its LWR energy? Is 8% more than or less than 0%? Get those chubby brain cells working Joke! It losses all of it eventually. Mornings are colder than the day before. You dodged the question Joke. Which will be warmer, a system which loses 100% of its emitted LWR energy or a system which loses only 92% of its LWR energy? It all depends, dipshit. Ah, there's the chubby question evading coward we all know and love...to laugh at.   -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:29    Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:26) [quote=k.e..,April 24 2018,12:25] Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:23) Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:22)   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:20)   Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:12)     Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:58)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:56)       Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:53)           Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:42)           Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:37)             Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:36)               Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:28)                 Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:26)                 Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:14) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki......._effect                   Quote If a planet's atmosphere contains radiatively active gases (i.e., greenhouse gases) they will radiate energy in all directions. Part of this radiation is directed towards the surface, warming it.[3] The intensity of the downward radiation – that is, the strength of the greenhouse effect – will depend on the atmosphere's temperature and on the amount of greenhouse gases that the atmosphere contains. Exactly what I have been saying. You fuckers are total assholes. The really really really simple bit you are missing bird brain is the temperature of the atmosphere affects (impacts) the Earth's surface and ocean temperatures through convection. Please explain how I am missing that. Or shut the fuck up                 Quote Joke: "CO2 cannot act as a blanket unless the all of the re-emitted energy is focused back towards earth. And even then that re-emitted energy is limited in range. So it really doesn't help you. The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." Please explain......               Quote The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." ....actually don't bother Joe that is comedy gold. It's even better than frequency = wavelength. If it doesn't reach the earth it cannot warm it. And seeing that the earth is radiating more heat than the CO2 re-emits how can the CO2's emissions warm it? Psst...hey dumbass... When the CO2 re-emits its energy does it warm the surrounding oxygen, nitrogen, argon etc. molecules in the atmosphere? Do those molecules mix with the entire atmosphere and provide more energy / increase the temperature of the whole thing? Christ you're an ignorant dumbass. LoL! CO2 emits the same wavelength as it absorbs. So only if oxygen, nitrogen, argon, etc. are greenhouse gasses with the same absorption spectra, then no, the re-emitted energy will not affect them. However the energized CO2 does bump into those other molecules causing it to lose some of its energy. That is why when that energy is re-emitted is less than what was absorbed. Christ you really are too stupid to understand conservation of energy Every day you get a little dumber. So the earth is an isolated system, is it? 5 watt Walkie-talkie signals race around the earth, do they? Well actually they can Joe. Check this out. WSPRNET Most of those comms are made on 5 Watts of TX power. Why? They are reflected from the Ionosphere often on multiple hops between the high atmosphere and the earths surface. Because Joe? Try doing something for yourself for once. The cool thong about DX is that the person you are trying to contact 10 miles away cannot hear you. It also blows your pea brain argument out of the water. How? Do CO2s' re-emissions bounce off of the ionosphere? You drew the parallel moron. And you choked on it, dipshit Creationist evasion. Talk about something they have no clue about then throw in a red herring. Proven wrong not just on carbon dioxide global warming but on the red herring as well. Way to go Joe. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:29    Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:29) [quote=Joe G,April 24 2018,20:26] Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:25) Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:23)   Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:22)   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:20)     Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:12)     Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:58)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:56)       Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:53)           Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:42)             Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:37)               Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:36)                 Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:28)                 Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:26)                   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:14) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki......._effect                     Quote If a planet's atmosphere contains radiatively active gases (i.e., greenhouse gases) they will radiate energy in all directions. Part of this radiation is directed towards the surface, warming it.[3] The intensity of the downward radiation – that is, the strength of the greenhouse effect – will depend on the atmosphere's temperature and on the amount of greenhouse gases that the atmosphere contains. Exactly what I have been saying. You fuckers are total assholes. The really really really simple bit you are missing bird brain is the temperature of the atmosphere affects (impacts) the Earth's surface and ocean temperatures through convection. Please explain how I am missing that. Or shut the fuck up                 Quote Joke: "CO2 cannot act as a blanket unless the all of the re-emitted energy is focused back towards earth. And even then that re-emitted energy is limited in range. So it really doesn't help you. The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." Please explain......               Quote The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." ....actually don't bother Joe that is comedy gold. It's even better than frequency = wavelength. If it doesn't reach the earth it cannot warm it. And seeing that the earth is radiating more heat than the CO2 re-emits how can the CO2's emissions warm it? Psst...hey dumbass... When the CO2 re-emits its energy does it warm the surrounding oxygen, nitrogen, argon etc. molecules in the atmosphere? Do those molecules mix with the entire atmosphere and provide more energy / increase the temperature of the whole thing? Christ you're an ignorant dumbass. LoL! CO2 emits the same wavelength as it absorbs. So only if oxygen, nitrogen, argon, etc. are greenhouse gasses with the same absorption spectra, then no, the re-emitted energy will not affect them. However the energized CO2 does bump into those other molecules causing it to lose some of its energy. That is why when that energy is re-emitted is less than what was absorbed. Christ you really are too stupid to understand conservation of energy Every day you get a little dumber. So the earth is an isolated system, is it? 5 watt Walkie-talkie signals race around the earth, do they? Well actually they can Joe. Check this out. WSPRNET Most of those comms are made on 5 Watts of TX power. Why? They are reflected from the Ionosphere often on multiple hops between the high atmosphere and the earths surface. Because Joe? Try doing something for yourself for once. The cool thong about DX is that the person you are trying to contact 10 miles away cannot hear you. It also blows your pea brain argument out of the water. How? Do CO2s' re-emissions bounce off of the ionosphere? You drew the parallel moron. And you choked on it, dipshit Creationist evasion. Talk about something they have no clue about then throw in a red herring. Proven wrong not just on carbon dioxide global warming but on the red herring as well. Way to go Joe. So you're a creationist? -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:30    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:29) Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:27)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:25)     Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:24)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:23)       Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:19)           Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:18) Let's try a really easy one for the dumbass. Hey Joke, how does putting a blanket over yourself on a cold night keep you warmer than no blanket? CO2 isn't like a blanket, moron. Blankets don't allow 92% of the body heat to escape. And blankets have more material than 400 parts per million Do blankets retain some heat or not? Which will be warmer, a system which loses 100% of its emitted LWR energy or a system which loses only 92% of its LWR energy? Is 8% more than or less than 0%? Get those chubby brain cells working Joke! It losses all of it eventually. Mornings are colder than the day before. You dodged the question Joke. Which will be warmer, a system which loses 100% of its emitted LWR energy or a system which loses only 92% of its LWR energy? It all depends, dipshit. Ah, there's the chubby question evading coward we all know and love...to laugh at.   :D It isn't my fault that you are too stupid to ask a proper question -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:31    Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:28) Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:26) Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:24)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:23)   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:19)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:18) Let's try a really easy one for the dumbass. Hey Joke, how does putting a blanket over yourself on a cold night keep you warmer than no blanket? CO2 isn't like a blanket, moron. Blankets don't allow 92% of the body heat to escape. And blankets have more material than 400 parts per million Do blankets retain some heat or not? Which will be warmer, a system which loses 100% of its emitted LWR energy or a system which loses only 92% of its LWR energy? Is 8% more than or less than 0%? Get those chubby brain cells working Joke! It losses all of it eventually. Mornings are colder than the day before. If there was no carbon dioxide in the atmosphere the whole earth would be a snowball. That's the point twit. Bullshit The information is freely available if you want to take a look Joe. Are your scared to look? -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:31    Where, Exactly, Is The Man-made Climate Problem? Can't tell from the data... -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:32    Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:31) Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:28) Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:26)   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:24)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:23)     Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:19)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:18) Let's try a really easy one for the dumbass. Hey Joke, how does putting a blanket over yourself on a cold night keep you warmer than no blanket? CO2 isn't like a blanket, moron. Blankets don't allow 92% of the body heat to escape. And blankets have more material than 400 parts per million Do blankets retain some heat or not? Which will be warmer, a system which loses 100% of its emitted LWR energy or a system which loses only 92% of its LWR energy? Is 8% more than or less than 0%? Get those chubby brain cells working Joke! It losses all of it eventually. Mornings are colder than the day before. If there was no carbon dioxide in the atmosphere the whole earth would be a snowball. That's the point twit. Bullshit The information is freely available if you want to take a look Joe. Are your scared to look? OK then present it and we will see. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:32    Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:30)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:29)   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:27)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:25)       Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:24)         Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:23)           Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,12:19)             Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,12:18) Let's try a really easy one for the dumbass. Hey Joke, how does putting a blanket over yourself on a cold night keep you warmer than no blanket? CO2 isn't like a blanket, moron. Blankets don't allow 92% of the body heat to escape. And blankets have more material than 400 parts per million Do blankets retain some heat or not? Which will be warmer, a system which loses 100% of its emitted LWR energy or a system which loses only 92% of its LWR energy? Is 8% more than or less than 0%? Get those chubby brain cells working Joke! It losses all of it eventually. Mornings are colder than the day before. You dodged the question Joke. Which will be warmer, a system which loses 100% of its emitted LWR energy or a system which loses only 92% of its LWR energy? It all depends, dipshit. Ah, there's the chubby question evading coward we all know and love...to laugh at.   It isn't my fault that you are too stupid to ask a proper question It is your fault you're too chickenshit to answer a simple question which you know demonstrates your scientific ignorance.   -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 24 2018,12:34    Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:29) [quote=k.e..,April 24 2018,12:29] Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:26) Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:25)   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:23)   Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:22)     Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,20:20)     Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,12:12)       Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:58)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:56)         Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:53)             Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ April 24 2018,11:42)             Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,11:37)               Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:36)                 Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:28)                   Quote (k.e.. @ April 24 2018,11:26)                   Quote (Joe G @ April 24 2018,19:14) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki......._effect                     Quote If a planet's atmosphere contains radiatively active gases (i.e., greenhouse gases) they will radiate energy in all directions. Part of this radiation is directed towards the surface, warming it.[3] The intensity of the downward radiation – that is, the strength of the greenhouse effect – will depend on the atmosphere's temperature and on the amount of greenhouse gases that the atmosphere contains. Exactly what I have been saying. You fuckers are total assholes. The really really really simple bit you are missing bird brain is the temperature of the atmosphere affects (impacts) the Earth's surface and ocean temperatures through convection. Please explain how I am missing that. Or shut the fuck up                   Quote Joke: "CO2 cannot act as a blanket unless the all of the re-emitted energy is focused back towards earth. And even then that re-emitted energy is limited in range. So it really doesn't help you. The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." Please explain......                 Quote The energy all gets swept away well before reaching the earth- winds and convection currents." ....actually don't bother Joe that is comedy gold. It's even better than frequency = wavelength. If it doesn't reach the earth it cannot warm it. And seeing that the earth is radiating more heat than the CO2 re-emits how can the CO2's emissions warm it? Psst...hey dumbass... When the CO2 re-emits its energy does it warm the surrounding oxygen, nitrogen, argon etc. molecules in the atmosphere? Do those molecules mix with the entire atmosphere and provide more energy / increase the temperature of the whole thing? Christ you're an ignorant dumbass. LoL! CO2 emits the same wavelength as it absorbs. So only if oxygen, nitrogen, argon, etc. are greenhouse gasses with the same absorption spectra, then no, the re-emitted energy will not affect them. However the energized CO2 does bump into those other molecules causing it to lose some of its energy. That is why when that energy is re-emitted is less than what was absorbed. Christ you really are too stupid to understand conservation of energy Every day you get a little dumber. So the earth is an isolated system, is it? 5 watt Walkie-talkie signals race around the earth, do they? Well actually they can Joe. Check this out. WSPRNET Most of those comms are made on 5 Watts of TX power. Why? They are reflected from the Ionosphere often on multiple hops between the high atmosphere and the earths surface. Because Joe? Try doing something for yourself for once. The cool thong about DX is that the person you are trying to contact 10 miles away cannot hear you. It also blows your pea brain argument out of the water. How? Do CO2s' re-emissions bounce off of the ionosphere? You drew the parallel moron. And you choked on it, dipshit Creationist evasion. Talk about something they have no clue about then throw in a red herring. Proven wrong not just on carbon dioxide global warming but on the red herring as well. Way to go Joe. So you're a creationist? What? Are you giving up Joe? Come on we want more of your moronic walkie talkie stuff. Tell how you can use carbon dioxide to talk to Hong Kong. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Pages: (919) < ... 487 488 489 490 491 [492] 493 494 495 496 497 ... >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard