RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (622) < ... 410 411 412 413 414 [415] 416 417 418 419 420 ... >   
  Topic: A Separate Thread for Gary Gaulin, As big as the poop that does not look< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,20:02   

Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 13 2014,00:01)
     
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,04:10)
       
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 12 2014,15:02)
Damn I missed a Friday meltdown ...must be something in the water over at UD.

Which meltdown in which thread(s) at UD are you referring to?

Only Gary's meltdown here.... sorry for the confusion. Might take him a little while over at UD before they give him enough rope. Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?

I think he was hoping to get a whole bunch of tard credits by drawing Wes into some sort of legal wrangle. All part of his plan of theft over toil.

Oh drat, I was hoping to see a huge meltdown at UD. Oh wait, UD is always a huge meltdown. :)

"Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?"

I doubt it, but I wish they could. It would be entertaining to see the responses from the other UD IDiots, and I would especially like to see Gary and gordo mullings 'debate' their versions of ID theory tard.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,20:14   

Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,20:02)
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 13 2014,00:01)
     
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,04:10)
       
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 12 2014,15:02)
Damn I missed a Friday meltdown ...must be something in the water over at UD.

Which meltdown in which thread(s) at UD are you referring to?

Only Gary's meltdown here.... sorry for the confusion. Might take him a little while over at UD before they give him enough rope. Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?

I think he was hoping to get a whole bunch of tard credits by drawing Wes into some sort of legal wrangle. All part of his plan of theft over toil.

Oh drat, I was hoping to see a huge meltdown at UD. Oh wait, UD is always a huge meltdown. :)

"Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?"

I doubt it, but I wish they could. It would be entertaining to see the responses from the other UD IDiots, and I would especially like to see Gary and gordo mullings 'debate' their versions of ID theory tard.

Scientific authority (if such a thing even exists) better take action against this sort of shit before the general public is forced to take legal action against funding sources and science administrators who have been enabling these bullies.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
Texas Teach



Posts: 2084
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,20:50   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:14)
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,20:02)
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 13 2014,00:01)
       
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,04:10)
         
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 12 2014,15:02)
Damn I missed a Friday meltdown ...must be something in the water over at UD.

Which meltdown in which thread(s) at UD are you referring to?

Only Gary's meltdown here.... sorry for the confusion. Might take him a little while over at UD before they give him enough rope. Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?

I think he was hoping to get a whole bunch of tard credits by drawing Wes into some sort of legal wrangle. All part of his plan of theft over toil.

Oh drat, I was hoping to see a huge meltdown at UD. Oh wait, UD is always a huge meltdown. :)

"Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?"

I doubt it, but I wish they could. It would be entertaining to see the responses from the other UD IDiots, and I would especially like to see Gary and gordo mullings 'debate' their versions of ID theory tard.

Scientific authority (if such a thing even exists) better take action against this sort of shit before the general public is forced to take legal action against funding sources and science administrators who have been enabling these bullies.

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "You guys quit laughing when two random guys on the Internet argue over which one is going to overturn science."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "Um, why?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Because the general public might sue you."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "For laughing at morons argue on the Internet?  Are you high?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Nevermind, carry on."

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,20:57   

Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,20:50)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:14)
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,20:02)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 13 2014,00:01)
       
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,04:10)
         
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 12 2014,15:02)
Damn I missed a Friday meltdown ...must be something in the water over at UD.

Which meltdown in which thread(s) at UD are you referring to?

Only Gary's meltdown here.... sorry for the confusion. Might take him a little while over at UD before they give him enough rope. Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?

I think he was hoping to get a whole bunch of tard credits by drawing Wes into some sort of legal wrangle. All part of his plan of theft over toil.

Oh drat, I was hoping to see a huge meltdown at UD. Oh wait, UD is always a huge meltdown. :)

"Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?"

I doubt it, but I wish they could. It would be entertaining to see the responses from the other UD IDiots, and I would especially like to see Gary and gordo mullings 'debate' their versions of ID theory tard.

Scientific authority (if such a thing even exists) better take action against this sort of shit before the general public is forced to take legal action against funding sources and science administrators who have been enabling these bullies.

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "You guys quit laughing when two random guys on the Internet argue over which one is going to overturn science."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "Um, why?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Because the general public might sue you."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "For laughing at morons argue on the Internet?  Are you high?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Nevermind, carry on."

What is your real name and what school do you supposedly teach at?

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
socle



Posts: 322
Joined: July 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,21:07   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:57)
What is your real name and what school do you supposedly teach at?

oh shit oh shit oh shit...

  
Woodbine



Posts: 1218
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,21:12   

Gary, for heaven's sake just call the Real-Science police!

How else are we supposed to keep monsters like Texas Teach away from our children?

  
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,21:24   

Quote
Scientific authority (if such a thing even exists) better take action against this sort of shit before the general public is forced to take legal action against funding sources and science administrators who have been enabling these bullies.


There are no "scientific authorities" of the sort you imagine.  Scientific ideas sink or swim on their merits (supporting evidence; internal consistency; fruitfulness; breadth of explanation; independent confirmation; passing tests; predictions fulfilled; etc., etc.)  Those merits lead to more people working on the subject, which leads to further confirmation and wider acceptance, or refutation and rejection.  Your nonsense is, of course, dead in the water on all counts.

There are, however, educational authorities, who can and do rule on whether theories are sufficiently widely accepted and sufficiently significant to deserve a place in the curriculum.  This process is political, and since anti-evolution religionists hold a lot of political power in many places, the theory of evolution is at risk of being removed from the curriculum.  However, this has comparatively little to do with arrogance by scientists, everything to do with fundamentalist religion, and nothing at all to do with your rubbish.  Here's my prediction: to whatever extent ID/creationism encroaches on science in K-12 curricula in either public or private schools, no educational authority will find any merit in your ideas on intelligence.

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,21:26   

http://www.nsf.gov/oig....oig

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,21:34   

Clueless.  That office is concerned with use of government funds with respect to NSF-funded research: funds not being misused, people doing what they promised to do with the funds they were given, and where funds can most usefully be spent:

   
Quote
   Offer analysis and advice on critical government-wide initiatives, such as computer security, program performance, workforce planning, and financial management.
   Look independently at problems and recommend solutions.
   Issue factual reports based on professional auditing, investigative, and evaluation standards.
   Investigate fraud, misuse of funds, and other violations of laws and regulations.
   Provide technical and consultative advice as the agency develops new plans.
   Maintain a hotline for reporting confidential information on fraud and abuse.

This has almost nothing to do with the practice of science outside of science funded by NSF (although the second item can reach beyond NSF's typical purview).  If someone uses NIH funds to run off to the Bahamas with a secretary and spends six months writing up results of pretend experiments to support a bogus theory, the NSF OIG has no jurisdiction or official interest.  (No doubt they would pass the information on to the NIH OIG [ http://oig.hhs.gov/....hhs....hhs.gov ], but that's not their domain and they are not any sort of general authority in science.)

Quote
What is your real name and what school do you supposedly teach at?
 If he wants to maintain his anonymity and privacy on the internet, he has every right to do so.

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,21:44   

Quote (N.Wells @ Dec. 13 2014,21:34)
That office is concerned with use of government funds with respect to NSF-funded research: funds not being misused, people doing what they promised to do with the funds they were given, and where funds can most usefully be spent:

 
Quote
   Offer analysis and advice on critical government-wide initiatives, such as computer security, program performance, workforce planning, and financial management.
   Look independently at problems and recommend solutions.
   Issue factual reports based on professional auditing, investigative, and evaluation standards.
   Investigate fraud, misuse of funds, and other violations of laws and regulations.
   Provide technical and consultative advice as the agency develops new plans.
   Maintain a hotline for reporting confidential information on fraud and abuse.

This has absolutely nothing to do with the practice of science outside of science funded by NSF.  If someone uses NIH funds to run off to the Bahamas with a secretary and spends six months writing up results of pretend experiments to support a bogus theory, the NSF OIG has no jurisdiction or official interest.  (No doubt they would pass the information on to the NIH OIG [ http://oig.hhs.gov/....hhs....hhs.gov ], but they are not any sort of general authority in science.)

I only began to show what kind of trouble is in store for those who have been knowingly or unknowingly helping to mislead the general public in regards to scientific issues that the taxpayers are paying to have resolved, not start a civil war over.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
Texas Teach



Posts: 2084
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,22:07   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:57)
Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,20:50)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:14)
 
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,20:02)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 13 2014,00:01)
         
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,04:10)
           
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 12 2014,15:02)
Damn I missed a Friday meltdown ...must be something in the water over at UD.

Which meltdown in which thread(s) at UD are you referring to?

Only Gary's meltdown here.... sorry for the confusion. Might take him a little while over at UD before they give him enough rope. Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?

I think he was hoping to get a whole bunch of tard credits by drawing Wes into some sort of legal wrangle. All part of his plan of theft over toil.

Oh drat, I was hoping to see a huge meltdown at UD. Oh wait, UD is always a huge meltdown. :)

"Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?"

I doubt it, but I wish they could. It would be entertaining to see the responses from the other UD IDiots, and I would especially like to see Gary and gordo mullings 'debate' their versions of ID theory tard.

Scientific authority (if such a thing even exists) better take action against this sort of shit before the general public is forced to take legal action against funding sources and science administrators who have been enabling these bullies.

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "You guys quit laughing when two random guys on the Internet argue over which one is going to overturn science."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "Um, why?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Because the general public might sue you."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "For laughing at morons argue on the Internet?  Are you high?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Nevermind, carry on."

What is your real name and what school do you supposedly teach at?

If you expect me to tell you my name, you really are insane.  Fanatics like you and your friends at UD are why I don't use my real name online.  If you don't like it, please feel free to fuck right off.

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,22:11   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 14 2014,04:14)
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,20:02)
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 13 2014,00:01)
       
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,04:10)
         
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 12 2014,15:02)
Damn I missed a Friday meltdown ...must be something in the water over at UD.

Which meltdown in which thread(s) at UD are you referring to?

Only Gary's meltdown here.... sorry for the confusion. Might take him a little while over at UD before they give him enough rope. Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?

I think he was hoping to get a whole bunch of tard credits by drawing Wes into some sort of legal wrangle. All part of his plan of theft over toil.

Oh drat, I was hoping to see a huge meltdown at UD. Oh wait, UD is always a huge meltdown. :)

"Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?"

I doubt it, but I wish they could. It would be entertaining to see the responses from the other UD IDiots, and I would especially like to see Gary and gordo mullings 'debate' their versions of ID theory tard.

Scientific authority (if such a thing even exists) better take action against this sort of shit before the general public is forced to take legal action against funding sources and science administrators who have been enabling these bullies.

Gary I think I can help you here. Your main problem is your brain isn't Turing compliant. What you need to do is reprogram it with a new operating system that is Turing compliant. To start with remove the main loop that goes nowhere.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,22:14   

Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,22:07)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:57)
Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,20:50)
 
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:14)
 
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,20:02)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 13 2014,00:01)
         
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,04:10)
           
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 12 2014,15:02)
Damn I missed a Friday meltdown ...must be something in the water over at UD.

Which meltdown in which thread(s) at UD are you referring to?

Only Gary's meltdown here.... sorry for the confusion. Might take him a little while over at UD before they give him enough rope. Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?

I think he was hoping to get a whole bunch of tard credits by drawing Wes into some sort of legal wrangle. All part of his plan of theft over toil.

Oh drat, I was hoping to see a huge meltdown at UD. Oh wait, UD is always a huge meltdown. :)

"Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?"

I doubt it, but I wish they could. It would be entertaining to see the responses from the other UD IDiots, and I would especially like to see Gary and gordo mullings 'debate' their versions of ID theory tard.

Scientific authority (if such a thing even exists) better take action against this sort of shit before the general public is forced to take legal action against funding sources and science administrators who have been enabling these bullies.

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "You guys quit laughing when two random guys on the Internet argue over which one is going to overturn science."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "Um, why?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Because the general public might sue you."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "For laughing at morons argue on the Internet?  Are you high?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Nevermind, carry on."

What is your real name and what school do you supposedly teach at?

If you expect me to tell you my name, you really are insane.  Fanatics like you and your friends at UD are why I don't use my real name online.  If you don't like it, please feel free to fuck right off.

I expected you to blame your victims, instead of being honest.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,22:28   

Quote
I only began to show what kind of trouble is in store for those who have been knowingly or unknowingly helping to mislead the general public in regards to scientific issues that the taxpayers are paying to have resolved, not start a civil war over.

That would be you.  Whether you are knowing or unknowing about the way you are trying to mislead people with your rubbish has been a matter of debate, but you are adding nothing to the public's discussion about evolution except confusion through lies and misrepresentation.

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,22:45   

Quote (N.Wells @ Dec. 13 2014,22:28)
Quote
I only began to show what kind of trouble is in store for those who have been knowingly or unknowingly helping to mislead the general public in regards to scientific issues that the taxpayers are paying to have resolved, not start a civil war over.

That would be you.  Whether you are knowing or unknowing about the way you are trying to mislead people with your rubbish has been a matter of debate, but you are adding nothing to the public's discussion about evolution except confusion through lies and misrepresentation.

Explain how "intelligence" and "intelligent cause" works, creep!!!!!!!!!!!

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,22:48   

Quote (N.Wells @ Dec. 13 2014,22:28)
Quote
I only began to show what kind of trouble is in store for those who have been knowingly or unknowingly helping to mislead the general public in regards to scientific issues that the taxpayers are paying to have resolved, not start a civil war over.

That would be you.  Whether you are knowing or unknowing about the way you are trying to mislead people with your rubbish has been a matter of debate, but you are adding nothing to the public's discussion about evolution except confusion through lies and misrepresentation.

And I thought I should highlight the latest dishonest moving of the goalposts. These people are either senile, dishonest, or simple insane.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
Texas Teach



Posts: 2084
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,22:54   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,22:14)
Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,22:07)
 
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:57)
 
Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,20:50)
   
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:14)
   
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,20:02)
     
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 13 2014,00:01)
           
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,04:10)
             
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 12 2014,15:02)
Damn I missed a Friday meltdown ...must be something in the water over at UD.

Which meltdown in which thread(s) at UD are you referring to?

Only Gary's meltdown here.... sorry for the confusion. Might take him a little while over at UD before they give him enough rope. Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?

I think he was hoping to get a whole bunch of tard credits by drawing Wes into some sort of legal wrangle. All part of his plan of theft over toil.

Oh drat, I was hoping to see a huge meltdown at UD. Oh wait, UD is always a huge meltdown. :)

"Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?"

I doubt it, but I wish they could. It would be entertaining to see the responses from the other UD IDiots, and I would especially like to see Gary and gordo mullings 'debate' their versions of ID theory tard.

Scientific authority (if such a thing even exists) better take action against this sort of shit before the general public is forced to take legal action against funding sources and science administrators who have been enabling these bullies.

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "You guys quit laughing when two random guys on the Internet argue over which one is going to overturn science."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "Um, why?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Because the general public might sue you."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "For laughing at morons argue on the Internet?  Are you high?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Nevermind, carry on."

What is your real name and what school do you supposedly teach at?

If you expect me to tell you my name, you really are insane.  Fanatics like you and your friends at UD are why I don't use my real name online.  If you don't like it, please feel free to fuck right off.

I expected you to blame your victims, instead of being honest.

Climb off the cross, Gaulin.  Even if we lived in a reality in which I was teaching horrible lies to children, you still wouldn't be one of my victims.  I have zero power over you aside from what you give me.  I can point out how wrong you are.  I can laugh at you.  You can leave this board whenever you like.  You can ignore any comments I type.  Well, you could if your desperate need for attention would let you.  All the abuse you get is by your own choice.

If you weren't an arrogant, ignorant, profoundly stupid lunatic, you could adjust your ideas into something less comical to the rest of the world.  Hell, if you weren't such an arrogant ass, some of us would just feel sorry for you and ignore you.  But you keep coming back to make grand, unsupportable claims, issue vague threats, whine about shadowy conspiracies against you, and commit unspeakable crimes against the English language.

Protip: you can't intimidate someone into giving up their security and whine about being a victim at the same time.  It's just sad.

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,22:58   

And the typo should read "simply insane". This includes those who are anonymously conducting false flag operations to stir up trouble that gets even more people hurt (then killed) in order to promote psychopathic religious agendas and in some parts of the world genocide.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
Woodbine



Posts: 1218
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,23:00   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 14 2014,03:26)
http://www.nsf.gov/oig............oig

LOL

Gary, who are you going to report?

And for what exactly?

  
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,23:01   

Quote
Explain how "intelligence" and "intelligent cause" works, creep!!!!!!!!!!!
 We don't have to, to know that your ideas are worse than worthless.  You can't get your basic facts right, and you can't and won't provide operational definitions for your nonstandard usages, nor any evidence that supports your bizarre claims.

Quote
Quote
That would be you.  Whether you are knowing or unknowing about the way you are trying to mislead people with your rubbish has been a matter of debate, but you are adding nothing to the public's discussion about evolution except confusion through lies and misrepresentation.


And I thought I should highlight the latest dishonest moving of the goalposts. These people are either senile, dishonest, or simple insane.

What goalpost shifting? You are on a board called Antievolution.org, you are saying that the concept of natural selection is wrong, you are arguing for the emergence of evolution, and you want your ideas to be taught alongside or instead of evolution.  What about that is not related to evolution and does not consist of you spreading rubbish around publicly?

  
Woodbine



Posts: 1218
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,23:02   

Gary, show me on the doll where Darwin water-boarded you.

  
Texas Teach



Posts: 2084
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,23:09   

Quote (Woodbine @ Dec. 13 2014,23:00)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 14 2014,03:26)
http://www.nsf.gov/oig............oig

LOL

Gary, who are you going to report?

And for what exactly?

I guess he wants to report me for satirizing him with imaginary dialogs.

Or maybe for all the genocide I'm contributing to by mocking his video game.

Or he wants to send me an Xmas card.  You can never tell with Gary.

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,23:26   

Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,22:54)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,22:14)
 
Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,22:07)
 
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:57)
   
Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,20:50)
   
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:14)
     
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,20:02)
     
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 13 2014,00:01)
             
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,04:10)
               
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 12 2014,15:02)
Damn I missed a Friday meltdown ...must be something in the water over at UD.

Which meltdown in which thread(s) at UD are you referring to?

Only Gary's meltdown here.... sorry for the confusion. Might take him a little while over at UD before they give him enough rope. Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?

I think he was hoping to get a whole bunch of tard credits by drawing Wes into some sort of legal wrangle. All part of his plan of theft over toil.

Oh drat, I was hoping to see a huge meltdown at UD. Oh wait, UD is always a huge meltdown. :)

"Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?"

I doubt it, but I wish they could. It would be entertaining to see the responses from the other UD IDiots, and I would especially like to see Gary and gordo mullings 'debate' their versions of ID theory tard.

Scientific authority (if such a thing even exists) better take action against this sort of shit before the general public is forced to take legal action against funding sources and science administrators who have been enabling these bullies.

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "You guys quit laughing when two random guys on the Internet argue over which one is going to overturn science."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "Um, why?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Because the general public might sue you."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "For laughing at morons argue on the Internet?  Are you high?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Nevermind, carry on."

What is your real name and what school do you supposedly teach at?

If you expect me to tell you my name, you really are insane.  Fanatics like you and your friends at UD are why I don't use my real name online.  If you don't like it, please feel free to fuck right off.

I expected you to blame your victims, instead of being honest.

Climb off the cross, Gaulin.  Even if we lived in a reality in which I was teaching horrible lies to children, you still wouldn't be one of my victims.  I have zero power over you aside from what you give me.  I can point out how wrong you are.  I can laugh at you.  You can leave this board whenever you like.  You can ignore any comments I type.  Well, you could if your desperate need for attention would let you.  All the abuse you get is by your own choice.

If you weren't an arrogant, ignorant, profoundly stupid lunatic, you could adjust your ideas into something less comical to the rest of the world.  Hell, if you weren't such an arrogant ass, some of us would just feel sorry for you and ignore you.  But you keep coming back to make grand, unsupportable claims, issue vague threats, whine about shadowy conspiracies against you, and commit unspeakable crimes against the English language.

Protip: you can't intimidate someone into giving up their security and whine about being a victim at the same time.  It's just sad.

If you really are a science teacher then what you are (at least right now) teaching is how to help you destroy those who go against your religious agenda that only trashes science in order to promote a religious ideology (Evolutionary Creationism).

It makes sense that a person such as yourself needs to (try to) remain in hiding, for as long as you can.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,23:58   

Gary, that's insane, even for you.

(ETA: referring to a now-deleted picture of an ISIS mass beheading.)

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 14 2014,00:41   

Moderators, please ban gary for life from this website.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Woodbine



Posts: 1218
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 14 2014,02:20   

Christ.

  
ChemiCat



Posts: 532
Joined: Nov. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 14 2014,05:15   

As a long time follower of this thread I would like to say that Gaulin has now flipped from deranged to homicidal.

I would suggest that any further communication with him is via the police or other such authorities.

He has now shown himself to be totally insane.

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 14 2014,06:25   

Does the genocide you're contributing to disturb you?

Good!!!!!

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 14 2014,06:53   

Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 14 2014,00:41)
Moderators, please ban gary for life from this website.

The "moderators" are busy helping to write hundred of pages of insults condemning Joe G, who (from what I read) is in the ID movement representing the religion of Islam:  

http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin....;t=6647

Oh what a wonderful way to spread peace and good will towards "western science" to all the world.

It's no wonder why those who attempt to teach it in certain parts of the world are either already dead, or worried about their turn coming soon.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 14 2014,06:54   

Gary, you posted a gratuitous picture of religious fundamentalists beheading people.  You are the person abusing scientific procedures and rules of argument and logic in order to try to support your own idiosyncratic version of an idea that has (more or less other than you) essentially no life outside of fundamentalist religion and would-be theocrats.  What exactly is the most logical analogy here?

If you and Joe G. stopped spouting nonsense, you wouldn't get laughed at.  Being laughed at is not equivalent to getting beheaded.

FWIW, I don't want to see Gary banned - I'd rather have the bankruptcy of his ideas fully displayed in open discussion, as with Joe G.

  
  18634 replies since Oct. 31 2012,02:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (622) < ... 410 411 412 413 414 [415] 416 417 418 419 420 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]