NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Jan. 19 2016,00:37) | ...
Due to circumstances beyond my control I have no choice but to make sure my work is not confused with what has become a scam that is now being made very obvious to others by saying crap like the following, while at the same time ignoring the work of the only one making any progress at all with such a theory:
... |
But Gary, your work is not confused with anyone's anything -- it is entirely irrelevant to everyone except yourself. That there is nothing out there to confuse it with is hardly a mark in its favor.
The fantasy that you are making any sort of 'progress' is even more ludicrous than calling your output a 'theory' or the suggestion that it is somehow concerned with design. It is surpassed only by the utter delusion that you are doing anything remotely original. Your work is sterile, derivative, and, ultimately, nothing but masturbatory word-fondling.
Your work over the past couple of years has involved little more than posting links to actual scientific work inevitably performed by others. Work that neither entails nor is entailed by a single one of your notions.
Your software is evidence of nothing but your limited ability to write code. It is neither interesting nor particularly creative code. Its output is meaningless to all except yourself.
There is no need to differentiate your work from the work of others once it is seen that your work is bad fan fiction, not science. It is unique. Sadly, uniqueness is trivial and not, in and of itself, a mark of quality or grounds for praise. It is, in fact, a product of language. Mucking about with language, and language games in the pejorative sense of term, is all you do. Were it ever to result in something new and correct, it would be by accident.
|
