Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > A Separate Thread for Gary Gaulin

Pages: (622) < ... 451 452 453 454 455 [456] 457 458 459 460 461 ... >

GaryGaulin Posts: 5385 Joined: Oct. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: April 10 2015,18:22    Quote (JohnW @ April 10 2015,17:25)   Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 09 2015,20:28) Not that adding swirling addressing elements to picture of what is going on inside its brain would not help show the liveliness. Shorter than most Sentence Of The Week Award winners, but no more lucid. I was "painting a picture" of what the abstract of the "Modular Deconstruction Reveals the Dynamical and Physical Building Blocks of a Locomotion Motor Program" paper seems to be describing happening in grids for sensing rotational dynamics:   Quote We found that the program was built from a very small number of dynamical building blocks, including both neural ensembles and low-dimensional rotational dynamics. These map onto physically discrete regions of the ganglion, so that the motor program has a corresponding modular organization in both dynamical and physical space. Using this dynamic map, we identify the population potentially implementing the rhythmic pattern generator and find that its activity physically traces a looped trajectory, recapitulating its low-dimensional rotational dynamics. From my experience with memory grids the swirling around of input would quickly provide the rotational dynamics needed by the navigation grid that is more or less the finished map of what the critter visually sees all around it. In the program that ends up primarily being the MyX, MyY, MyAngle, MyMagnitude and MyDirection of travel during each TimeStep. I have to say that giving the contents of a grid memory system some swirling action would in a model of one quickly find the same numbers the program also needs and uses. And you? -------------- The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

Texas Teach Posts: 2084 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 10 2015,18:32    Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 10 2015,16:56) The way the "scientific process" now works you must be a political hack like Texas Teach or else the political hacks running US academia have to punish you. Poor Gary. He thinks he's being punished when someone points and laughs at what a ridiculous liar he is.  That's not political, Gary, it's completely, totally, and in all ways direct squarely at your personal silliness. -------------- "Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr "I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

GaryGaulin Posts: 5385 Joined: Oct. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: April 10 2015,18:39    Quote (Jim_Wynne @ April 10 2015,17:56) Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 10 2015,16:18) Quote (Jim_Wynne @ April 10 2015,13:32) As for the two Nature links, if I were a betting man I would wager that you didn't read anything more than the abstracts, but that's all you need in Real-Science, I guess. Go to hell you piece of shit. Nice. Don't you think it's scientifically unethical to reference research papers you haven't read and wouldn't understand if you did read them? It's not my fault that research I wish I could afford to read is being held ransom behind expensive pay-walls!!!!!! I am already angry enough about other bullshit going on to keep me in debt until I'm (no kidding) over 100 years old for having borrowed money to buy an inexpensive house to live in! Miss a couple of payments then they have you back to what to what you borrowed in the first place but since we're still living here I am supposed to be thankful for years and years of paying for nothing! The amount of forcing me to pay and pay and pay for punishment has me very on the edge right now, and I sure don't need more slaps in the face from academic snobs who like it that way. -------------- The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

Texas Teach Posts: 2084 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 10 2015,18:46    Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 10 2015,18:39) Quote (Jim_Wynne @ April 10 2015,17:56) Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 10 2015,16:18)   Quote (Jim_Wynne @ April 10 2015,13:32) As for the two Nature links, if I were a betting man I would wager that you didn't read anything more than the abstracts, but that's all you need in Real-Science, I guess. Go to hell you piece of shit. Nice. Don't you think it's scientifically unethical to reference research papers you haven't read and wouldn't understand if you did read them? It's not my fault that research I wish I could afford to read is being held ransom behind expensive pay-walls!!!!!! [snip complaining that is irrelevant to why he lies] Libraries, how do they work? Your inability to pay for articles is no excuse to lie about reading things you haven't read. -------------- "Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr "I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

GaryGaulin Posts: 5385 Joined: Oct. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: April 10 2015,19:16    Quote (Texas Teach @ April 10 2015,18:46) Libraries, how do they work? I wish I could afford a car or transportation like you probably take for granted. With all that you're worth you should be forced to teach for free and be severely punished if you don't. The lifetime experience would help you to better relate with those who get nothing at all, from the system that starves them to feed you. -------------- The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

GaryGaulin Posts: 5385 Joined: Oct. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: April 10 2015,20:08    Quote (Texas Teach @ April 10 2015,18:46) Your inability to pay for articles is no excuse to lie about reading things you haven't read. And I noticed your creepy reading comprehension problem, you asshole. -------------- The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

Texas Teach Posts: 2084 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 10 2015,20:49    Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 10 2015,19:16) Quote (Texas Teach @ April 10 2015,18:46) Libraries, how do they work? I wish I could afford a car or transportation like you probably take for granted. With all that you're worth you should be forced to teach for free and be severely punished if you don't. The lifetime experience would help you to better relate with those who get nothing at all, from the system that starves them to feed you. Poor Gary.  Starved by the system.  Why can't they just pay him to make up stuff about molecules and lie about reading articles? -------------- "Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr "I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

N.Wells Posts: 1836 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,00:44    Quote (Texas Teach @ April 10 2015,16:49) Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 10 2015,16:18)   Quote (Jim_Wynne @ April 10 2015,13:32) As for the two Nature links, if I were a betting man I would wager that you didn't read anything more than the abstracts, but that's all you need in Real-Science, I guess. Go to hell you piece of shit. Translation from the Gaulinese: "yes, you're right, but I'm not honest enough to admit it, correct the behavior, and proceed like a mature adult, so I'll just spew insults at my intellectual betters." That's Gary all over. Really, Gary, if you won't respond to any criticisms except with irrelevant music video links, pitiful whines, and pointless insults, you will risk suggesting to people that your ideas aren't worth defending and that you can't defend them.

Wesley R. Elsberry Posts: 4991 Joined: May 2002 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,08:04    I wonder if Gary can point to a place in any of the neuroscience articles where they state that an organism is born with its place and grid cells already mapped to an existing environment, at the correct scale, its current location represented there, and its orientation set. -------------- "You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

Jim_Wynne Posts: 1208 Joined: June 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,09:24    Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 10 2015,18:39) Quote (Jim_Wynne @ April 10 2015,17:56) Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 10 2015,16:18)   Quote (Jim_Wynne @ April 10 2015,13:32) As for the two Nature links, if I were a betting man I would wager that you didn't read anything more than the abstracts, but that's all you need in Real-Science, I guess. Go to hell you piece of shit. Nice. Don't you think it's scientifically unethical to reference research papers you haven't read and wouldn't understand if you did read them? It's not my fault that research I wish I could afford to read is being held ransom behind expensive pay-walls!!!!!! True, but it is your fault that you cite research papers that you haven't read.  Very unethical, don't you think? -------------- Evolution is not about laws but about randomness on happanchance.--Robert Byers, at PT

GaryGaulin Posts: 5385 Joined: Oct. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,10:11    Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ April 11 2015,08:04) I wonder if Gary can point to a place in any of the neuroscience articles where they state that an organism is born with its place and grid cells already mapped to an existing environment, at the correct scale, its current location represented there, and its orientation set. It looks like Wesley is going to try impressing us with their sciency sounding Evo-Devo vocabulary that explains absolutely nothing, but at least makes them look smart to peers and to funding agencies who regularly flush money down a toilet. -------------- The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

N.Wells Posts: 1836 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,10:20    Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 11 2015,10:11)   Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ April 11 2015,08:04) I wonder if Gary can point to a place in any of the neuroscience articles where they state that an organism is born with its place and grid cells already mapped to an existing environment, at the correct scale, its current location represented there, and its orientation set. It looks like Wesley is going to try impressing us with their sciency sounding Evo-Devo vocabulary that explains absolutely nothing, but at least makes them look smart to peers and to funding agencies who regularly flush money down a toilet. Projection, projection, projection. Wesley uses a minimum of technical terms and does so correctly. In stark contrast, you use a lot of sciencey-sounding jargon, and you nearly always get it wrong.  In your dreams, you hope to sound like you know what you are talking about, but in reality you are throwing around "emergence" and "self-similarity" FOR THE SAME DAMN PHENOMENON, you are attacking natural selection without understanding what it means, you are yammering on about "intelligence" without having an operational definition for it, and so on and so forth.  The ONLY person you are fooling is you.  Congratulations on being exceptionally easy to fool. And Wesley is a him, not a their.  (Unless he's a borg collective of higher intelligence, which might explain why you are so thoroughly losing every argument with him.  On second thought, no, it's just that your arguments are so absolutely utterly awful, as evidenced by the fact that you can't even defend them yourself.) And for crying out loud, can't you come up with some complaints and some wording that isn't pulled straight out of previous complaints about you?

GaryGaulin Posts: 5385 Joined: Oct. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,10:30    Quote (N.Wells @ April 11 2015,10:20) Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 11 2015,10:11)   Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ April 11 2015,08:04) I wonder if Gary can point to a place in any of the neuroscience articles where they state that an organism is born with its place and grid cells already mapped to an existing environment, at the correct scale, its current location represented there, and its orientation set. It looks like Wesley is going to try impressing us with their sciency sounding Evo-Devo vocabulary that explains absolutely nothing, but at least makes them look smart to peers and to funding agencies who regularly flush money down a toilet. Projection, projection, projection. Wesley uses a minimum of technical terms and does so correctly. In stark contrast, you use a lot of sciencey-sounding jargon, and you nearly always get it wrong.  In your dreams, you hope to sound like you know what you are talking about, but in reality you are throwing around "emergence" and "self-similarity" FOR THE SAME DAMN PHENOMENON, you are attacking natural selection without understanding what it means, you are yammering on about "intelligence" without having an operational definition for it, and so on and so forth.  The ONLY person you are fooling is you.  Congratulations on being exceptionally easy to fool. And Wesley is a him, not a their.  (Unless he's a borg collective of higher intelligence, which might explain why you are so thoroughly losing every argument with him.  On second thought, no, it's just that your arguments are so absolutely utterly awful, as evidenced by the fact that you can't even defend them yourself.) And for crying out loud, can't you come up with some complaints and some wording that isn't pulled straight out of previous complaints about you? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki...._effect -------------- The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

N.Wells Posts: 1836 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,10:37    Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 11 2015,10:30) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki......._effect Congratulations: now that you've correctly self-diagnosed, that greatly improves your chances of being able to get some help. It occurs to me that if you were to announce that your entire schtick has been a decades-long piece of performance art, you could retire famous (in a good way), and get on with your life.

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,11:06    Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 11 2015,11:11) Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ April 11 2015,08:04) I wonder if Gary can point to a place in any of the neuroscience articles where they state that an organism is born with its place and grid cells already mapped to an existing environment, at the correct scale, its current location represented there, and its orientation set. It looks like Wesley is going to try impressing us with their sciency sounding Evo-Devo vocabulary that explains absolutely nothing, but at least makes them look smart to peers and to funding agencies who regularly flush money down a toilet. There is no 'us', unless you're counting the voices in your head. It is doubtlessly escaped your attention, as so much does, but you have zero supporters here or elsewhere on the net. Over the last 8+ years you have managed to convince no one that there is any merit in your effluent. Your steaming pile of verbiage explains nothing, nothing at all.  It lacks any and all content that could have explanatory force.  We've explained why, in tedious detail, over the past hundreds of pages. You're not a very fast learner, are you?

GaryGaulin Posts: 5385 Joined: Oct. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,11:09    Quote (N.Wells @ April 11 2015,10:37) Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 11 2015,10:30) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki......._effect Congratulations: now that you've correctly self-diagnosed, that greatly improves your chances of being able to get some help. It occurs to me that if you were to announce that your entire schtick has been a decades-long piece of performance art, you could retire famous (in a good way), and get on with your life. So says another nitwit who never made it past the childish Evolutionary Algorithms now being falsely claimed to explain the origin of intelligence. -------------- The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

GaryGaulin Posts: 5385 Joined: Oct. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,11:24    What we are seeing is what happens when academic ceremonies and entitlements cause swellheaded thinking that results in a very well funded cases of "the blind leading the blind". -------------- The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

GaryGaulin Posts: 5385 Joined: Oct. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,11:25    Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 11 2015,11:24) What we are seeing is what happens when academic ceremonies and entitlements cause swellheaded thinking that results in well funded cases of "the blind leading the blind". Or stated typo free: -------------- The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,11:30    Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 11 2015,12:09) Quote (N.Wells @ April 11 2015,10:37) Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 11 2015,10:30) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki......._effect Congratulations: now that you've correctly self-diagnosed, that greatly improves your chances of being able to get some help. It occurs to me that if you were to announce that your entire schtick has been a decades-long piece of performance art, you could retire famous (in a good way), and get on with your life. So says another nitwit who never made it past the childish Evolutionary Algorithms now being falsely claimed to explain the origin of intelligence. You are distinctly not qualified to utter pronouncements on this matter seeing as how you are unwilling and unable to precisely specify what you mean by 'intelligence'. We have shown that your purported explanation fails in the face of a number of phenomena widely taken to be best explained by intelligent agency.  We have shown that your purported explanation includes phenomena that are typically taken not to be signs of intelligence. So, tl;dr version:  you don't know what you're talking about. Same as it ever was.

stevestory Posts: 13407 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,12:42    shorter gary:

GaryGaulin Posts: 5385 Joined: Oct. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,13:38    Quote (NoName @ April 11 2015,11:30) You are distinctly not qualified to utter pronouncements on this matter seeing as how you are unwilling and unable to precisely specify what you mean by 'intelligence'. We have shown that your purported explanation fails in the face of a number of phenomena widely taken to be best explained by intelligent agency.  We have shown that your purported explanation includes phenomena that are typically taken not to be signs of intelligence. So, tl;dr version:  you don't know what you're talking about. Same as it ever was. That is a good example of a swellheaded response that completely avoids the real scientific issue, where the final judge is science itself and the real experts are those authoring the papers that have been explained in the science news I have good reason to be excited about too. Educrats who would likely not even know what's going on in cognitive science these days without my having explained it to them should not be appointing themselves judges. The group-think can make it seem it's impossible for all of them to be wrong, even though having a problem with the most modern "grid" related terminology indicates not being current with what's now most being used to explained how intelligence works. And by the way, cells have hexagonal networks with thousands or millions of locations inside "patches" that are known to process visual and other sensory information but the details for how that works are not yet known. Mocking and ridiculing theory that truly does help explain something interesting to look for happening at the cellular and molecular levels only shows how scientifically useless the hidebound academic system I'm stuck having to deal with actually is. Even the Templeton Foundation only throws money at academic related corporations/institutions who only need to make everything look great on paper. All "individuals" who are outside of the traditional academic system get to drop dead from trying to do everything themselves. -------------- The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,14:43    Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 11 2015,14:38) Quote (NoName @ April 11 2015,11:30) You are distinctly not qualified to utter pronouncements on this matter seeing as how you are unwilling and unable to precisely specify what you mean by 'intelligence'. We have shown that your purported explanation fails in the face of a number of phenomena widely taken to be best explained by intelligent agency.  We have shown that your purported explanation includes phenomena that are typically taken not to be signs of intelligence. So, tl;dr version:  you don't know what you're talking about. Same as it ever was. That is a good example of a swellheaded response that completely avoids the real scientific issue, where the final judge is science itself and the real experts are those authoring the papers that have been explained in the science news I have good reason to be excited about too. Educrats who would likely not even know what's going on in cognitive science these days without my having explained it to them should not be appointing themselves judges. The group-think can make it seem it's impossible for all of them to be wrong, even though having a problem with the most modern "grid" related terminology indicates not being current with what's now most being used to explained how intelligence works. And by the way, cells have hexagonal networks with thousands or millions of locations inside "patches" that are known to process visual and other sensory information but the details for how that works are not yet known. Mocking and ridiculing theory that truly does help explain something interesting to look for happening at the cellular and molecular levels only shows how scientifically useless the hidebound academic system I'm stuck having to deal with actually is. Even the Templeton Foundation only throws money at academic related corporations/institutions who only need to make everything look great on paper. All "individuals" who are outside of the traditional academic system get to drop dead from trying to do everything themselves. Meaningless bluster. You demonstrably do not know what's going on in cognitive science simply by your ongoing misuse of the term. Your usages are all contrary to the standard definitions used in Cognitive Science. The rest of your codswallop dies the real death in the unarguable fact that you do not have any definition for 'intelligence', let alone an operational, meaningful, univocal definition. You have no examples to ground-truth your work. You have no answer to the counter-examples that demolish what few clear claims can be extracted from your effluent. You lost before you started, and you continue to fail downwards. As always.

N.Wells Posts: 1836 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,15:10    Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 11 2015,11:25)     Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 11 2015,11:24) What we are seeing is what happens when academic ceremonies and entitlements cause swellheaded thinking that results in well funded cases of "the blind leading the blind". Or stated typo free: Yes, I agree, that's entirely what is left when we remove typos, errors, mistakes, and overall stupidity from your verbiage. (Yes, I know, you put your intro statement after your intended correction, but you can't even get that right, and your mistake is delightful.) No one is making inane and illogical claims about the origins of intelligence, except (of course) you.

GaryGaulin Posts: 5385 Joined: Oct. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,15:46    Quote (N.Wells @ April 11 2015,15:10) No one is making inane and illogical claims about the origins of intelligence, except (of course) you. So says another brownnoser with vested interests in the old-school junk that now really only serves the Atheist agenda, which you are in this forum to represent. What passes as science in your camp is best represented by PZ Myers' "You are a meat robot with a network of autopilots" article. Adding one more Evolutionary Algorithm to the pile that already exists is worth millions, to those who want everyone to stop right there and go no further than that into science. -------------- The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

fnxtr Posts: 3504 Joined: June 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,16:13    Gary if we're all so hopeless why don't you just fuck off and spend the rest of your life re-writing your Roomba code? I'm sure you believe you'll only be famous after you're dead... who knows, maybe even canonized.  That'll show us, hey? You are a lonely crackpot. You have convinced NO-ONE that anything you have produced has any scientific merit whatsoever. Not even the DI, and that's setting the bar lower than a snake can mamba. -------------- "[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory "Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

ChemiCat Posts: 532 Joined: Nov. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,16:29    Gaulin, your science envy is showing again. Your "theory" and "model" add nothing to the cognitive sciences. You distort the definitions of commonly used words and phrases to fit your prejudices. You, to put it politely, "borrow" from reputable scientists' work and try to fit it into a framework that has nothing to do with their original papers. You latch on to words you think will sound good in your drivel without the faintest idea of what they mean. Have you contacted any of the authors you have "borrowed" from to ask if they accept your use of their works? I bet the answer is a resounding no. And, further, I bet that they would totally reject your distortion of their works. Your "theory" is a stranger to your "model" and your "model" has never been on the same planet as your "theory". You have no testable, repeatable predictions in your "theory" and your bug (with a hippocampus!) is not a model of anything remotely connected to cognition or biology. And you still haven't said how molecules have "intelligence" or why RNA is unimolecular. Because you don't understand what you are typing and are incapable of defending your "work". In fact you are a failure who blames other people for your poverty and poor health instead of placing the situation firmly where it belongs, with you.

GaryGaulin Posts: 5385 Joined: Oct. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,17:00    Most of these people qualify as psychopathic liars. But I would not be surprised by their actually believing what they say is true. -------------- The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

GaryGaulin Posts: 5385 Joined: Oct. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,17:07    From: https://psychopathyawareness.wordpress.com/2012....dictory Quote Psychopaths are not only inconsistent over time, but also contradictory. The biggest contradiction you will notice is between what a psychopaths says and his behavior. He will say he supports you professionally yet do everything to undermine your reputation, sabotage your job or even insist that you quit your work altogether, I can sure relate to that too. -------------- The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

Texas Teach Posts: 2084 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,18:26    Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 11 2015,17:07) From: https://psychopathyawareness.wordpress.com/2012.......dictory Quote Psychopaths are not only inconsistent over time, but also contradictory. The biggest contradiction you will notice is between what a psychopaths says and his behavior. He will say he supports you professionally yet do everything to undermine your reputation, sabotage your job or even insist that you quit your work altogether, I can sure relate to that too. Oh please, no one has ever claimed to support you. -------------- "Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr "I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

GaryGaulin Posts: 5385 Joined: Oct. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: April 11 2015,18:32    Quote (Texas Teach @ April 11 2015,18:26) Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 11 2015,17:07) From: https://psychopathyawareness.wordpress.com/2012.......dictory   Quote Psychopaths are not only inconsistent over time, but also contradictory. The biggest contradiction you will notice is between what a psychopaths says and his behavior. He will say he supports you professionally yet do everything to undermine your reputation, sabotage your job or even insist that you quit your work altogether, I can sure relate to that too. Oh please, no one has ever claimed to support you. http://collectivelyconscious.net/memes......hopaths -------------- The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

Pages: (622) < ... 451 452 453 454 455 [456] 457 458 459 460 461 ... >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard