Antievolution.org - Antievolution.org Discussion Board -Topic::Uncommonly Dense Thread 5

k.e..

Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink)

Posted: Dec. 28 2017,05:28

Quote (JohnW @ Dec. 28 2017,06:08)

Quote (clamboy @ Dec. 27 2017,19:41)

Quote (stevestory @ Dec. 26 2017,23:31)

Quote (CeilingCat @ Dec. 26 2017,22:34)

The War Against Christmas strikes deeper than you might think:

Holiday Message from Stephen Meyer

Quote

"Because, yes, reaching the world, against the combined will of Darwinist censors, scolds, and propagandists, is indeed a fight. In 2017, thanks to you we enjoyed unprecedented success in extending our message. We’ve done so through numerous books, chapters, and articles, major research projects, and graduate degree scholarships, through online and in-person education and outreach. We have seen very direct successes for academic freedom in Louisiana, Texas, Alabama, and Indiana. The launch of a high-profile new research center in Brazil, Discovery Institute-Mackenzie, was a huge step forward."

The DI labs in seattle are so overwhelmed with research they had to expand.

These shitweasels can barely keep their blogs active 😛

This is pure fundraising bs. They dont want to have to get real jobs because suckering a handful of rich dimwits is a sweet gig.

So, what exactly is a "Darwinist scold"?

"You'll never have reproductive fitness if you go slouching about! And get a haircut! You think your father and I intended you to have a phenotype like that?!?"

POTW

I second that with simian clapping, a Darwinist Barnicle, a Banksian Banksia and a Wallice Line.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his ~~clown~~ DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Acartia_Bogart

Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink)

Posted: Dec. 28 2017,13:57

KF in the Apple thread

Quote

PS: Apparently, there is a predominance of Korean women involved which raises not just human trafficking but espionage and extortion of confidential information.

The Tinfoil Hat Isn’t Wound Tight Enough

Dr.GH

Posts: 2333
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink)

Posted: Dec. 29 2017,21:42

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Dec. 28 2017,11:57)

The Tinfoil Hat Isn’t Wound Tight Enough

Great line.

Acartia_Bogart

Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink)

Posted: Dec. 31 2017,13:22

KF

Quote

CR, why on earth are you raising an irrelevancy but to serve as a red herring distractor led out to a strawman caricature soaked in ad hominems, to be set alight to cloud, confuse, poison and polarise the atmosphere?

I won’t bother posting a link because you can probably find something similar in any threat he has been active in.

Acartia_Bogart

Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink)

Posted: Dec. 31 2017,17:31

Oops. Somebody pissed in Barry’s cornflakes.

JSmith-simpering coward

Acartia_Bogart

Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 02 2018,11:18

Batshitcrazy77 has resurfaced over at UD. I am going to by shares in scroll-wheel manufacturers.

Comment 4

k.e..

Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 03 2018,04:20

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 02 2018,19:18)

Batshitcrazy77 has resurfaced over at UD. I am going to by shares in scroll-wheel manufacturers.

Comment 4

And sell all your shares in sleeping pill companies.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his ~~clown~~ DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

stevestory

Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 03 2018,10:34

Are there any science allies allowed over at UD right now besides CR, JSmith, and DaveS?

stevestory

Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 03 2018,10:38

Quote

102
JSmithJanuary 2, 2018 at 11:37 pm
SB

Quote

You mean something like — an unborn child is 3/5ths of a person? Just enough of a right to say that you are anti-abortion, but not enough to save the baby. I get it.

All I am saying is that if you objectively believe that a fetus has the same right to life as you and I, then to not charge a woman who has an abortion with first degree murder is pure hypocrisy.

i like this fella.

Acartia_Bogart

Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 03 2018,11:14

Quote (stevestory @ Jan. 03 2018,10:34)

Are there any science allies allowed over at UD right now besides CR, JSmith, and DaveS?

I've seen Bob Oh and Seversky as well.

Acartia_Bogart

Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 03 2018,11:19

Quote (stevestory @ Jan. 03 2018,10:38)

Quote

102
JSmithJanuary 2, 2018 at 11:37 pm
SB

Quote

You mean something like — an unborn child is 3/5ths of a person? Just enough of a right to say that you are anti-abortion, but not enough to save the baby. I get it.

All I am saying is that if you objectively believe that a fetus has the same right to life as you and I, then to not charge a woman who has an abortion with first degree murder is pure hypocrisy.

i like this fella.

Apparently Barry doesn't.

Quote

Why should anyone care what you say about anything when you are not even certain it is wrong to treat black persons as inferior to white persons or women as nonpersons?

I never thought you would admit that. I was wrong. You disgust me.

To suggest that it is even conceivable that black persons are inferior to white persons is evil. To suggest that it is even conceivable that women are not persons is evil. You have done both. You are evil.

Just for the record, this was in response to JSmith answering this:

Quote

No. But I am as subjectively certain of this as my reasoning ability allows.

To the following questions from StephenB:

Quote

1. Are you absolutely certain that it is an objective fact that treating women as if they are not persons is wrong?

2. Are you absolutely certain that it is an objective fact that it is wrong to treat black persons as inferior to white persons?

3. Are you absolutely certain that it is an objective fact that counting black people as 3/5 of a person when determining government representatives is wrong?

Interestingly, JSmith appears to be ignoring any comment or question that comes from Barry. That must really piss him off.

stevestory

Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 03 2018,11:43

I think JSmith recently dropped an "offhand" remark to the effect of 'when someone's not being rational I just ignore them'.

I think he's trying to test the resilience of nutbag lawyers to cerebral infarction.

Acartia_Bogart

Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 03 2018,12:27

Quote (stevestory @ Jan. 03 2018,11:43)

I think JSmith recently dropped an "offhand" remark to the effect of 'when someone's not being rational I just ignore them'.

I think he's trying to test the resilience of nutbag lawyers to cerebral infarction. :p

Barry has a history of banning people shortly after featuring them in an OP. Maybe JSmith is aware of this and just deciding to have has much fun as he can, while he can.

Ptaylor

Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 04 2018,02:13

Ha ha - from the JSmith is a poopyhead thread:

Quote

147
mike1962 January 3, 2018 at 11:30 pm
JSmith: “rights are what we as a society decide rights to be.”

You wish. Without absolute rights, your right to live is what I decide it should be.

Bang bang, shoot shoot.

Then I eat your liver.

Now, in a universe where absolute rights exist I may still kill you and eat your liver, but at least you would have a real moral basis to complain.

So acknowledge that fact, or shut the hell up.

P.S. now, if you really want to push your “no objective morality where humans really and truly are valuable in a transcendent way”, then don’t be surprised when people believe you, and act on that, kill you, and eat your liver. Without conscience.

Quote

148
JSmith January 4, 2018 at 12:12 am
Mike, I really like your arguments. They are rational, logical and stay away from over the top rhetoric. You have convinced me.

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

k.e..

Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 04 2018,05:53

Quote (Ptaylor @ Jan. 04 2018,10:13)

Ha ha - from the JSmith is a poopyhead thread:

Quote

147
mike1962 January 3, 2018 at 11:30 pm
JSmith: “rights are what we as a society decide rights to be.”

You wish. Without absolute rights, your right to live is what I decide it should be.

Bang bang, shoot shoot.

Then I eat your liver.

Now, in a universe where absolute rights exist I may still kill you and eat your liver, but at least you would have a real moral basis to complain.

So acknowledge that fact, or shut the hell up.

P.S. now, if you really want to push your “no objective morality where humans really and truly are valuable in a transcendent way”, then don’t be surprised when people believe you, and act on that, kill you, and eat your liver. Without conscience.

Quote

148
JSmith January 4, 2018 at 12:12 am
Mike, I really like your arguments. They are rational, logical and stay away from over the top rhetoric. You have convinced me.

I would love to have been a fly on the wall at mike1962's trailer park.

A splurt of Cheetos and Jim Beam from his mouth coupled with a rising red tide in his eyes followed by steam coming out of his ears.

Priceless.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his ~~clown~~ DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Acartia_Bogart

Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 04 2018,09:10

Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 04 2018,05:53)

Quote (Ptaylor @ Jan. 04 2018,10:13)

Ha ha - from the JSmith is a poopyhead thread:

Quote

147
mike1962 January 3, 2018 at 11:30 pm
JSmith: “rights are what we as a society decide rights to be.”

You wish. Without absolute rights, your right to live is what I decide it should be.

Bang bang, shoot shoot.

Then I eat your liver.

Now, in a universe where absolute rights exist I may still kill you and eat your liver, but at least you would have a real moral basis to complain.

So acknowledge that fact, or shut the hell up.

P.S. now, if you really want to push your “no objective morality where humans really and truly are valuable in a transcendent way”, then don’t be surprised when people believe you, and act on that, kill you, and eat your liver. Without conscience.

Quote

148
JSmith January 4, 2018 at 12:12 am
Mike, I really like your arguments. They are rational, logical and stay away from over the top rhetoric. You have convinced me.

I would love to have been a fly on the wall at mike1962's trailer park.

A splurt of Cheetos and Jim Beam from his mouth coupled with a rising red tide in his eyes followed by steam coming out of his ears.

Priceless.

Smith just keeps taunting Barry. Never responds to his questions but signs off his comments with the insults that Barry has thrown at him.

Quote

JSmith
Your friendly neighbourhood disgusting, evil, mocking, hypocritical, scoffing, simpering coward Nazi.

stevestory

Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 04 2018,14:15

Quote

160
JSmithJanuary 4, 2018 at 8:04 am
TWSYF

Quote

JSmith @ 148: Mike is speaking truth to you. Your response reveals a surprising level of naivety about the world you live in.

Really? Because I thought that I was being obviously sarcastic in response to a stupid comment.

owwie

stevestory

Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 04 2018,14:36

Quote

192
JSmithJanuary 4, 2018 at 10:59 am
A

Quote

They have a religious devotion to aborting human babies. They speak the language of the culture dedicated to the death of the small and voiceless. What is obvious to us is totally lost on them. They won’t hear us. Their minds are closed.

So far, there is only one person who has proposed actions that have been shown to significantly reduce abortion rates. Admittedly, making them illegal will also reduce the abortion rates, but this will be short lived as an underground system of abortion access will develop. Making them illegal will also increase the risk to women who have an illegal abortion. And given that affluent women will still have access to safe abortions in another country, the increased risk will be born disproportionately by the poor and by minorities.

It is quite obvious that some commenters here are not interested in any tactic that will reduce abortion rates that does not include criminalizing women who still choose to have them.

All of the preaching, sermonizing and legislation in the world is not going to stop people from having sex for pleasure. And there is nothing wrong with having sex for pleasure. I feel only pity for anyone who chooses not to..They don’t know what they are missing. Since you can’t, and shouldn’t stop people from having sex, It is in societies best interests to make sure that they have the knowledge and tools necessary to make good decisions.

But if anyone else has a proposal that will significantly reduce the abortion rates without increasing the risk to woman, feel free to present it. It would be nice if you also had evidence to support it.

https://uncommondescent.com/intelli....-647376

Acartia_Bogart

Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 04 2018,14:44

KF's opinion on sex education.

Quote

...How much education they really need about sexual mechanics could be given in a couple of hours,...

Link

Ptaylor

Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 04 2018,16:51

Some dimwit named ET chimes in on the abortion discussion:

Quote

200
ETJanuary 4, 2018 at 2:02 pm
Yes, human are sexual. We are also allegedly intelligent. We should know what happens when we have sex. Ignorance is neither an argument nor an excuse.

So everyone should be educated and sign an agreement that they now know about sex. Then those who still have unwanted pregnancies leading to abortions will be fined, heavily, jailed or sterilized. That is the price for ending a human life and a small price at that.

I would advocate the death penalty for any and all abortions done covertly. Doctor and patient.

Yeah, let's kill the sluts!

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

Acartia_Bogart

Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 04 2018,17:01

Quote (Ptaylor @ Jan. 04 2018,16:51)

Some dimwit named ET chimes in on the abortion discussion:

Quote

200
ETJanuary 4, 2018 at 2:02 pm
Yes, human are sexual. We are also allegedly intelligent. We should know what happens when we have sex. Ignorance is neither an argument nor an excuse.

So everyone should be educated and sign an agreement that they now know about sex. Then those who still have unwanted pregnancies leading to abortions will be fined, heavily, jailed or sterilized. That is the price for ending a human life and a small price at that.

I would advocate the death penalty for any and all abortions done covertly. Doctor and patient.

Yeah, let's kill the sluts!

Well, that is a change from his early claim.

Quote

The hormonal imbalance defense will be used as readily as temporary insanity in order to spare women getting an abortion from first degree murder.

k.e..

Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 05 2018,03:35

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 04 2018,17:10)

Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 04 2018,05:53)

Quote (Ptaylor @ Jan. 04 2018,10:13)

Ha ha - from the JSmith is a poopyhead thread:

Quote

147
mike1962 January 3, 2018 at 11:30 pm
JSmith: “rights are what we as a society decide rights to be.”

You wish. Without absolute rights, your right to live is what I decide it should be.

Bang bang, shoot shoot.

Then I eat your liver.

Now, in a universe where absolute rights exist I may still kill you and eat your liver, but at least you would have a real moral basis to complain.

So acknowledge that fact, or shut the hell up.

P.S. now, if you really want to push your “no objective morality where humans really and truly are valuable in a transcendent way”, then don’t be surprised when people believe you, and act on that, kill you, and eat your liver. Without conscience.

Quote

148
JSmith January 4, 2018 at 12:12 am
Mike, I really like your arguments. They are rational, logical and stay away from over the top rhetoric. You have convinced me.

I would love to have been a fly on the wall at mike1962's trailer park.

A splurt of Cheetos and Jim Beam from his mouth coupled with a rising red tide in his eyes followed by steam coming out of his ears.

Priceless.

Smith just keeps taunting Barry. Never responds to his questions but signs off his comments with the insults that Barry has thrown at him.

Quote

JSmith
Your friendly neighbourhood disgusting, evil, mocking, hypocritical, scoffing, simpering coward Nazi.

<choke> Coffee screen wipeout.

Buy that man another drink and invite him over here.......er.....OK which one of you is JSmith?

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his ~~clown~~ DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Ptaylor

Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 05 2018,20:45

I suppose this, or something like it, was inevitable:

Quote

232
JSmith January 5, 2018 at 4:50 pm

KF

JS, you seem to imagine it is clever to use a $64 word for “stupid,” to caricature, studiously ignore, stereotype and dismiss what I have had to say.

I have never suggested that you are stupid. Just that the way you write your OPs and comments is obtuse. And that is the first time that I have ever heard anyone call the word “obtuse” a $64 word. Would you prefer simpler words like “rambling”, “indecipherable”, “condescending” or “arrogant”? The reason I don’t respond to your comments is that they rarely have anything of value to say.

Happy new year.

UDEditors: JSmith is now in the moderation queue. When (if) he apologizes to KF for this comment, he will be released.

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

Acartia_Bogart

Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 05 2018,21:55

Quote (Ptaylor @ Jan. 05 2018,20:45)

I suppose this, or something like it, was inevitable:

Quote

232
JSmith January 5, 2018 at 4:50 pm

KF

JS, you seem to imagine it is clever to use a $64 word for “stupid,” to caricature, studiously ignore, stereotype and dismiss what I have had to say.

I have never suggested that you are stupid. Just that the way you write your OPs and comments is obtuse. And that is the first time that I have ever heard anyone call the word “obtuse” a $64 word. Would you prefer simpler words like “rambling”, “indecipherable”, “condescending” or “arrogant”? The reason I don’t respond to your comments is that they rarely have anything of value to say.

Happy new year.

UDEditors: JSmith is now in the moderation queue. When (if) he apologizes to KF for this comment, he will be released.

You just have to love it. Barry calls him a simpering coward, a Nazi, and few other choice words and then puts him in moderation for stating the blatantly obvious about KF’s comments. I will miss him.

k.e..

Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 06 2018,00:16

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 06 2018,05:55)

Quote (Ptaylor @ Jan. 05 2018,20:45)

I suppose this, or something like it, was inevitable:

Quote

232
JSmith January 5, 2018 at 4:50 pm

KF

JS, you seem to imagine it is clever to use a $64 word for “stupid,” to caricature, studiously ignore, stereotype and dismiss what I have had to say.

I have never suggested that you are stupid. Just that the way you write your OPs and comments is obtuse. And that is the first time that I have ever heard anyone call the word “obtuse” a $64 word. Would you prefer simpler words like “rambling”, “indecipherable”, “condescending” or “arrogant”? The reason I don’t respond to your comments is that they rarely have anything of value to say.

Happy new year.

UDEditors: JSmith is now in the moderation queue. When (if) he apologizes to KF for this comment, he will be released.

You just have to love it. Barry calls him a simpering coward, a Nazi, and few other choice words and then puts him in moderation for stating the blatantly obvious about KF’s comments. I will miss him.

Value of werdz fall to all time low.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his ~~clown~~ DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Acartia_Bogart

Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 06 2018,13:06

Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 06 2018,00:16)

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 06 2018,05:55)

Quote (Ptaylor @ Jan. 05 2018,20:45)

I suppose this, or something like it, was inevitable:

Quote

232
JSmith January 5, 2018 at 4:50 pm

KF

JS, you seem to imagine it is clever to use a $64 word for “stupid,” to caricature, studiously ignore, stereotype and dismiss what I have had to say.

I have never suggested that you are stupid. Just that the way you write your OPs and comments is obtuse. And that is the first time that I have ever heard anyone call the word “obtuse” a $64 word. Would you prefer simpler words like “rambling”, “indecipherable”, “condescending” or “arrogant”? The reason I don’t respond to your comments is that they rarely have anything of value to say.

Happy new year.

UDEditors: JSmith is now in the moderation queue. When (if) he apologizes to KF for this comment, he will be released.

You just have to love it. Barry calls him a simpering coward, a Nazi, and few other choice words and then puts him in moderation for stating the blatantly obvious about KF’s comments. I will miss him.

Value of werdz fall to all time low.

JSmith’s apology

Quote

JSmithJanuary 5, 2018 at 10:08 pm
I honestly apologize to KF for not being as tactful with my comment as I should have been.

Am I the only one who doesn’t see this as an apology?

Cubist

Posts: 558
Joined: Oct. 2007

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 06 2018,14:35

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 06 2018,13:06)

Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 06 2018,00:16)

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 06 2018,05:55)

Quote (Ptaylor @ Jan. 05 2018,20:45)

I suppose this, or something like it, was inevitable:

Quote

232
JSmith January 5, 2018 at 4:50 pm

KF

JS, you seem to imagine it is clever to use a $64 word for “stupid,” to caricature, studiously ignore, stereotype and dismiss what I have had to say.

I have never suggested that you are stupid. Just that the way you write your OPs and comments is obtuse. And that is the first time that I have ever heard anyone call the word “obtuse” a $64 word. Would you prefer simpler words like “rambling”, “indecipherable”, “condescending” or “arrogant”? The reason I don’t respond to your comments is that they rarely have anything of value to say.

Happy new year.

UDEditors: JSmith is now in the moderation queue. When (if) he apologizes to KF for this comment, he will be released.

You just have to love it. Barry calls him a simpering coward, a Nazi, and few other choice words and then puts him in moderation for stating the blatantly obvious about KF’s comments. I will miss him.

Value of werdz fall to all time low.

JSmith’s apology

Quote

JSmithJanuary 5, 2018 at 10:08 pm
I honestly apologize to KF for not being as tactful with my comment as I should have been.

Am I the only one who doesn’t see this as an apology?

Yeah, that's a pretty classic specimen of the notpology genre.

Acartia_Bogart

Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 06 2018,22:47

OldAndrew:

Quote

It reflects appreciation for the scriptures, but other verses even more clearly indicate that Christians regard the scriptures as the primary source of truth. Others had grown fond of Greek philosophy and eventually elevated it alongside the Bible. But Plato, Socrates, and the like are dust on the scales. Paul advised Christians not to be caught up in their thinking. To value God’s word over human philosophy and tradition is also a core Christian principle.

OldAndrew is going to get a spanking when KF wakes up. OldAndrew has all the trappings of an atheist luring KF into a trap. It should be fun when he springs it.

Link

Sorry if I outed someone. :)

k.e..

Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 07 2018,08:54

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 07 2018,06:47)

OldAndrew:

Quote

It reflects appreciation for the scriptures, but other verses even more clearly indicate that Christians regard the scriptures as the primary source of truth. Others had grown fond of Greek philosophy and eventually elevated it alongside the Bible. But Plato, Socrates, and the like are dust on the scales. Paul advised Christians not to be caught up in their thinking. To value God’s word over human philosophy and tradition is also a core Christian principle.

OldAndrew is going to get a spanking when KF wakes up. OldAndrew has all the trappings of an atheist luring KF into a trap. It should be fun when he springs it.

Link

Sorry if I outed someone. :)

KF may suspect a red herring drizzled with oil of adhomenim smoked on a nuclear spit and served by a straw man with a canard sauce. I tell you Montserrat cooking is the best once you remove the dog saliva, feathers and shotgun pellets.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his ~~clown~~ DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

sparc

Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink)

Posted: Jan. 07 2018,13:16

Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 07 2018,08:54)

I tell you Montserrat cooking is the best once you remove the dog saliva, feathers and shotgun pellets.

Is this the procedure that turns frogs into chicken?

--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

	Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution