Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > Joe G.'s Tardgasm

Pages: (919) < ... 376 377 378 379 380 [381] 382 383 384 385 386 ... >

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,10:34    Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:16) Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:08)   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:00)   Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:57)     Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:53)     Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:48)       Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:43) Why weren't those Dover school board members charged with perjury? You know that would prove god doesn't exist....fool. Really? That you think so just exposes your desperation. Whine away joe. If you were really serious you would set up a fund to re-litigate  Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District. You think you can win go for it or STFU. Fuck you, loser. You can't support evolutionism. You don't have any science to support your position. You are just an ignorant asshole on an agenda. No one cares about Dover, dickhead. Well evoTARDs do but they don't care about facts and truths. There will be more Court cases and seeing that we have learned evoTARD tactics those tactics will be useless next time. ID lost Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District in 2004 ....so when can we expect the next big ID loss joe? 2024 2050? ID has never lost so what do you mean by "next"? When will anyone discover any evidence to support the claims of evolutionism? Quote NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. A declaratory judgment is hereby issued in favor of Plaintiffs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 such that Defendants’ ID Policy violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and Art. I, § 3 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 2. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65, Defendants are permanently enjoined from maintaining the ID Policy in any school within the Dover Area School District. 3. Because Plaintiffs seek nominal damages, Plaintiffs shall file with the Court and serve on Defendants, their claim for damages and a verified statement of any fees and/or costs to which they claim entitlement. Defendants shall have the right to object to any such fees and costs to the extent provided in the applicable statutes and court rules. s/John E. Jones III John E. Jones III United States District Judge Plus the Dover school board paid over $1,000,000 to the Plaintiffs for legal costs as ordered by the court. If that's not losing joe then you are batshit crazy. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,10:35    Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:27) Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:24) Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:15)   Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:05)   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:55) Dr Behe refutes Jones Read it and weep, loser Is that the same Michael Behe that admitted in court that Astrology would fit his definition of a Scientific Theory? Who lost joe? ....pssst it was you. Unlike your position astrology made testable claims. Oh really? Have you any idea what you just said? Name ONE. I know what I said. Astrologists used to claim, and they still may, that certain planetary alignments caused specific things. So all we had to do is test that claim. Yes and fireflies have lights in their asses. Answer the question. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,10:37    Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:34) Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:16) Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:08)   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:00)   Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:57)     Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:53)     Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:48)       Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:43) Why weren't those Dover school board members charged with perjury? You know that would prove god doesn't exist....fool. Really? That you think so just exposes your desperation. Whine away joe. If you were really serious you would set up a fund to re-litigate  Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District. You think you can win go for it or STFU. Fuck you, loser. You can't support evolutionism. You don't have any science to support your position. You are just an ignorant asshole on an agenda. No one cares about Dover, dickhead. Well evoTARDs do but they don't care about facts and truths. There will be more Court cases and seeing that we have learned evoTARD tactics those tactics will be useless next time. ID lost Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District in 2004 ....so when can we expect the next big ID loss joe? 2024 2050? ID has never lost so what do you mean by "next"? When will anyone discover any evidence to support the claims of evolutionism? Quote NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. A declaratory judgment is hereby issued in favor of Plaintiffs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 such that Defendants’ ID Policy violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and Art. I, § 3 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 2. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65, Defendants are permanently enjoined from maintaining the ID Policy in any school within the Dover Area School District. 3. Because Plaintiffs seek nominal damages, Plaintiffs shall file with the Court and serve on Defendants, their claim for damages and a verified statement of any fees and/or costs to which they claim entitlement. Defendants shall have the right to object to any such fees and costs to the extent provided in the applicable statutes and court rules. s/John E. Jones III John E. Jones III United States District Judge Plus the Dover school board paid over $1,000,000 to the Plaintiffs for legal costs as ordered by the court. If that's not losing joe then you are batshit crazy. ID did NOT lose, asshole. The Dover SB did. Huge difference, loser. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,10:38    Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:35) Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:27) Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:24)   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:15)   Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:05)     Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:55) Dr Behe refutes Jones Read it and weep, loser Is that the same Michael Behe that admitted in court that Astrology would fit his definition of a Scientific Theory? Who lost joe? ....pssst it was you. Unlike your position astrology made testable claims. Oh really? Have you any idea what you just said? Name ONE. I know what I said. Astrologists used to claim, and they still may, that certain planetary alignments caused specific things. So all we had to do is test that claim. Yes and fireflies have lights in their asses. Answer the question. I did. It isn't my fault that you are too stupid to understand the answer. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,10:39    Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:34) Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:16) Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:08)   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:00)   Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:57)     Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:53)     Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:48)       Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:43) Why weren't those Dover school board members charged with perjury? You know that would prove god doesn't exist....fool. Really? That you think so just exposes your desperation. Whine away joe. If you were really serious you would set up a fund to re-litigate  Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District. You think you can win go for it or STFU. Fuck you, loser. You can't support evolutionism. You don't have any science to support your position. You are just an ignorant asshole on an agenda. No one cares about Dover, dickhead. Well evoTARDs do but they don't care about facts and truths. There will be more Court cases and seeing that we have learned evoTARD tactics those tactics will be useless next time. ID lost Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District in 2004 ....so when can we expect the next big ID loss joe? 2024 2050? ID has never lost so what do you mean by "next"? When will anyone discover any evidence to support the claims of evolutionism? Quote NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. A declaratory judgment is hereby issued in favor of Plaintiffs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 such that Defendants’ ID Policy violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and Art. I, § 3 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 2. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65, Defendants are permanently enjoined from maintaining the ID Policy in any school within the Dover Area School District. 3. Because Plaintiffs seek nominal damages, Plaintiffs shall file with the Court and serve on Defendants, their claim for damages and a verified statement of any fees and/or costs to which they claim entitlement. Defendants shall have the right to object to any such fees and costs to the extent provided in the applicable statutes and court rules. s/John E. Jones III John E. Jones III United States District Judge Plus the Dover school board paid over $1,000,000 to the Plaintiffs for legal costs as ordered by the court. If that's not losing joe then you are batshit crazy. ID doesn't have anything to do with religion so it clearly does not violate the establishment clause. However evolutionism promotes atheism and as such does violate the establishment clause. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,10:40    Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:38) Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:35) Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:27)   Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:24)   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:15)     Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:05)     Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:55) Dr Behe refutes Jones Read it and weep, loser Is that the same Michael Behe that admitted in court that Astrology would fit his definition of a Scientific Theory? Who lost joe? ....pssst it was you. Unlike your position astrology made testable claims. Oh really? Have you any idea what you just said? Name ONE. I know what I said. Astrologists used to claim, and they still may, that certain planetary alignments caused specific things. So all we had to do is test that claim. Yes and fireflies have lights in their asses. Answer the question. I did. It isn't my fault that you are too stupid to understand the answer. DO YOU EVEN KNOW what Astrology is? Don't you read newspapers? -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,10:43    Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:39) Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:34)   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:16)   Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:08)     Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:00)     Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:57)       Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:53)       Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:48)         Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:43) Why weren't those Dover school board members charged with perjury? You know that would prove god doesn't exist....fool. Really? That you think so just exposes your desperation. Whine away joe. If you were really serious you would set up a fund to re-litigate  Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District. You think you can win go for it or STFU. Fuck you, loser. You can't support evolutionism. You don't have any science to support your position. You are just an ignorant asshole on an agenda. No one cares about Dover, dickhead. Well evoTARDs do but they don't care about facts and truths. There will be more Court cases and seeing that we have learned evoTARD tactics those tactics will be useless next time. ID lost Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District in 2004 ....so when can we expect the next big ID loss joe? 2024 2050? ID has never lost so what do you mean by "next"? When will anyone discover any evidence to support the claims of evolutionism?   Quote NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. A declaratory judgment is hereby issued in favor of Plaintiffs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 such that Defendants’ ID Policy violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and Art. I, § 3 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 2. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65, Defendants are permanently enjoined from maintaining the ID Policy in any school within the Dover Area School District. 3. Because Plaintiffs seek nominal damages, Plaintiffs shall file with the Court and serve on Defendants, their claim for damages and a verified statement of any fees and/or costs to which they claim entitlement. Defendants shall have the right to object to any such fees and costs to the extent provided in the applicable statutes and court rules. s/John E. Jones III John E. Jones III United States District Judge Plus the Dover school board paid over $1,000,000 to the Plaintiffs for legal costs as ordered by the court. If that's not losing joe then you are batshit crazy. ID doesn't have anything to do with religion so it clearly does not violate the establishment clause. However evolutionism promotes atheism and as such does violate the establishment clause. On the contrary a court has found ID does violate the establishment clause and no court has found that the Scientific Theory of Evolution does. The conclusion here must be that joe is a moron. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,10:43    Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:40) Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:38) Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:35)   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:27)   Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:24)     Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:15)     Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:05)       Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:55) Dr Behe refutes Jones Read it and weep, loser Is that the same Michael Behe that admitted in court that Astrology would fit his definition of a Scientific Theory? Who lost joe? ....pssst it was you. Unlike your position astrology made testable claims. Oh really? Have you any idea what you just said? Name ONE. I know what I said. Astrologists used to claim, and they still may, that certain planetary alignments caused specific things. So all we had to do is test that claim. Yes and fireflies have lights in their asses. Answer the question. I did. It isn't my fault that you are too stupid to understand the answer. DO YOU EVEN KNOW what Astrology is? Don't you read newspapers? CAN YOU EVEN FORM AN ARGUMENT? CAN YOU EVEN READ? -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,10:44    Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,07:54) I never said all experiments support ID.     Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 23 2018,04:57)     all experiments and observations support baraminology What experiments supports baraminology and not ID Chubs? If all the experiments and observations supports baraminology why isn't the DI and all the IDiots like you supporting baraminology? Oh, that's right.  You are a YEC.   -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,10:44    Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:43) Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:39) Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:34)   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:16)   Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:08)     Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:00)     Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:57)       Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:53)       Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:48)         Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:43) Why weren't those Dover school board members charged with perjury? You know that would prove god doesn't exist....fool. Really? That you think so just exposes your desperation. Whine away joe. If you were really serious you would set up a fund to re-litigate  Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District. You think you can win go for it or STFU. Fuck you, loser. You can't support evolutionism. You don't have any science to support your position. You are just an ignorant asshole on an agenda. No one cares about Dover, dickhead. Well evoTARDs do but they don't care about facts and truths. There will be more Court cases and seeing that we have learned evoTARD tactics those tactics will be useless next time. ID lost Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District in 2004 ....so when can we expect the next big ID loss joe? 2024 2050? ID has never lost so what do you mean by "next"? When will anyone discover any evidence to support the claims of evolutionism?   Quote NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. A declaratory judgment is hereby issued in favor of Plaintiffs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 such that Defendants’ ID Policy violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and Art. I, § 3 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 2. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65, Defendants are permanently enjoined from maintaining the ID Policy in any school within the Dover Area School District. 3. Because Plaintiffs seek nominal damages, Plaintiffs shall file with the Court and serve on Defendants, their claim for damages and a verified statement of any fees and/or costs to which they claim entitlement. Defendants shall have the right to object to any such fees and costs to the extent provided in the applicable statutes and court rules. s/John E. Jones III John E. Jones III United States District Judge Plus the Dover school board paid over $1,000,000 to the Plaintiffs for legal costs as ordered by the court. If that's not losing joe then you are batshit crazy. ID doesn't have anything to do with religion so it clearly does not violate the establishment clause. However evolutionism promotes atheism and as such does violate the establishment clause. On the contrary a court has found ID does violate the establishment clause and not court has found that the Scientific Theory of Evolution does. The conclusion here must be that joe is a moron. ID doesn't violate the establishment clause. And there isn't any scientific theory of evolution. The conclusion is that you are a willfully ignorant ass -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,10:46    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:44) Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,07:54) I never said all experiments support ID.     Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 23 2018,04:57)     all experiments and observations support baraminology What evidence supports baraminology and not ID Chubs? If all the evidence and observations supports baraminology why isn't the DI and all the IDiots like you supportinging baraminology? Oh, that's right.  You are a YEC.   :D The experiments allow for evolution by means of blind and mindless processes, asshole. So do observations. It is just that those processes are impotent with respect to Common Descent. But then again you are way too stupid to understand that -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,10:47    The astrology myth Good reading. Too bad the evoTARDs won't be able to understand it -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,10:49    Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:46) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:44) Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,07:54) I never said all experiments support ID.       Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 23 2018,04:57)     all experiments and observations support baraminology What evidence supports baraminology and not ID Chubs? If all the evidence and observations supports baraminology why isn't the DI and all the IDiots like you supportinging baraminology? Oh, that's right.  You are a YEC.   The experiments allow for evolution by means of blind and mindless processes How do those experiments support baraminology Chubs? Put down your Krispy Kreme and answer the question. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,10:51    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:49) Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:46) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:44)   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,07:54) I never said all experiments support ID.       Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 23 2018,04:57)     all experiments and observations support baraminology What evidence supports baraminology and not ID Chubs? If all the evidence and observations supports baraminology why isn't the DI and all the IDiots like you supportinging baraminology? Oh, that's right.  You are a YEC.   :D The experiments allow for evolution by means of blind and mindless processes How do those experiments support baraminology Chubs? Put down your Krispy Kreme and answer the question. Already answered, assface. They all show there are severe limits to evolutionary processes. And nothing shows Common Descent is possible. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,10:58    Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:51) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:49)   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:46)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:44)     Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,07:54) I never said all experiments support ID.         Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 23 2018,04:57)     all experiments and observations support baraminology What evidence supports baraminology and not ID Chubs? If all the evidence and observations supports baraminology why isn't the DI and all the IDiots like you supportinging baraminology? Oh, that's right.  You are a YEC.   :D The experiments allow for evolution by means of blind and mindless processes How do those experiments support baraminology Chubs? Put down your Krispy Kreme and answer the question. Already answered, assface. They all show there are severe limits to evolutionary processes. And nothing shows Common Descent is possible. What experiment shows a limit to evolutionary processes Chubs?  What is the physical mechanism of that limit? You're long on YEC bluster but woefully short on positive evidence. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,11:00    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:58) Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:51)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:49)   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:46)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:44)     Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,07:54) I never said all experiments support ID.           Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 23 2018,04:57)     all experiments and observations support baraminology What evidence supports baraminology and not ID Chubs? If all the evidence and observations supports baraminology why isn't the DI and all the IDiots like you supportinging baraminology? Oh, that's right.  You are a YEC.   :D The experiments allow for evolution by means of blind and mindless processes How do those experiments support baraminology Chubs? Put down your Krispy Kreme and answer the question. Already answered, assface. They all show there are severe limits to evolutionary processes. And nothing shows Common Descent is possible. What experiment shows a limit to evolutionary processes Chubs?  What is the physical mechanism of that limit? You're long on YEC bluster but woefully short on positive evidence. All experiments do, asshole. And don't talk about positive evidence, loser. Your position doesn't have any. What limits evolutionary change? Genetics. Heck you and yours don't have a mechanism capable of producing eukaryotes. Yours is a complete non-starter -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,11:01    Occam's assface complains about positive evidence and its position doesn't have any. Not only that it chokes on all of the positive evidence for ID. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,11:02    Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:00) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:58) Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:51)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:49)     Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:46)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:44)       Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,07:54) I never said all experiments support ID.           Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 23 2018,04:57)     all experiments and observations support baraminology What evidence supports baraminology and not ID Chubs? If all the evidence and observations supports baraminology why isn't the DI and all the IDiots like you supportinging baraminology? Oh, that's right.  You are a YEC.   The experiments allow for evolution by means of blind and mindless processes How do those experiments support baraminology Chubs? Put down your Krispy Kreme and answer the question. Already answered, assface. They all show there are severe limits to evolutionary processes. And nothing shows Common Descent is possible. What experiment shows a limit to evolutionary processes Chubs?  What is the physical mechanism of that limit? You're long on YEC bluster but woefully short on positive evidence. All experiments do, asshole. And don't talk about positive evidence, loser. Your position doesn't have any. What limits evolutionary change? Genetics. Heck you and yours don't have a mechanism capable of producing eukaryotes. Yours is a complete non-starter "All experiments do" yet assface Joke Gallien can't name a single one!   -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,11:03    Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:01) Occam's assface complains about positive evidence and its position doesn't have any. Not only that it chokes on all of the positive evidence for ID. Joe Assface Gallien is a YEC who thinks the Earth is 6001 years old.   Tell us more about ID baraminology Chubs. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,11:06    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,11:02) Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:00) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:58)   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:51)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:49)     Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:46)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:44)       Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,07:54) I never said all experiments support ID.             Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 23 2018,04:57)     all experiments and observations support baraminology What evidence supports baraminology and not ID Chubs? If all the evidence and observations supports baraminology why isn't the DI and all the IDiots like you supportinging baraminology? Oh, that's right.  You are a YEC.   :D The experiments allow for evolution by means of blind and mindless processes How do those experiments support baraminology Chubs? Put down your Krispy Kreme and answer the question. Already answered, assface. They all show there are severe limits to evolutionary processes. And nothing shows Common Descent is possible. What experiment shows a limit to evolutionary processes Chubs?  What is the physical mechanism of that limit? You're long on YEC bluster but woefully short on positive evidence. All experiments do, asshole. And don't talk about positive evidence, loser. Your position doesn't have any. What limits evolutionary change? Genetics. Heck you and yours don't have a mechanism capable of producing eukaryotes. Yours is a complete non-starter "All experiments do" yet assface Joke Gallien can't name a single one!   :D Lenski's experiment, for starters. And again all means all. Look them up and stop being such a willfully ignorant ass -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,11:06    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,11:03) Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:01) Occam's assface complains about positive evidence and its position doesn't have any. Not only that it chokes on all of the positive evidence for ID. Joe Assface Gallien is a YEC who thinks the Earth is 6001 years old.   :D Tell us more about ID baraminology Chubs. Have your mommy change your diaper, timmy. It is full of shit and you are getting hungry. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,11:07    Occam's assface complains about positive evidence and its position doesn't have any. Not only that it chokes on all of the positive evidence for ID. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,11:09    Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:06) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,11:02)   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:00)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:58)     Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:51)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:49)       Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:46)         Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:44)         Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,07:54) I never said all experiments support ID.               Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 23 2018,04:57)     all experiments and observations support baraminology What evidence supports baraminology and not ID Chubs? If all the evidence and observations supports baraminology why isn't the DI and all the IDiots like you supportinging baraminology? Oh, that's right.  You are a YEC.   The experiments allow for evolution by means of blind and mindless processes How do those experiments support baraminology Chubs? Put down your Krispy Kreme and answer the question. Already answered, assface. They all show there are severe limits to evolutionary processes. And nothing shows Common Descent is possible. What experiment shows a limit to evolutionary processes Chubs?  What is the physical mechanism of that limit? You're long on YEC bluster but woefully short on positive evidence. All experiments do, asshole. And don't talk about positive evidence, loser. Your position doesn't have any. What limits evolutionary change? Genetics. Heck you and yours don't have a mechanism capable of producing eukaryotes. Yours is a complete non-starter "All experiments do" yet assface Joke Gallien can't name a single one!   Lenski's experiment, for starters. And again all means all. Look them up and stop being such a willfully ignorant ass Lenski's experiments didn't show any genetic limits to change Joke. Driving a car for 1 mile isn't evidence a car can't drive 100 miles over time. Chubs fails again.   -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,11:10    Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:07) Occam's assface complains about positive evidence and its position doesn't have any. Not only that it chokes on all of the positive evidence for ID. Joe Assface Gallien is a YEC who thinks the Earth is 6001 years old.   Tell us more about ID baraminology Chubs. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,11:18    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,11:09) Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:06)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,11:02)   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:00)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:58)     Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:51)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:49)         Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:46)         Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:44)           Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,07:54) I never said all experiments support ID.               Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 23 2018,04:57)     all experiments and observations support baraminology What evidence supports baraminology and not ID Chubs? If all the evidence and observations supports baraminology why isn't the DI and all the IDiots like you supportinging baraminology? Oh, that's right.  You are a YEC.   :D The experiments allow for evolution by means of blind and mindless processes How do those experiments support baraminology Chubs? Put down your Krispy Kreme and answer the question. Already answered, assface. They all show there are severe limits to evolutionary processes. And nothing shows Common Descent is possible. What experiment shows a limit to evolutionary processes Chubs?  What is the physical mechanism of that limit? You're long on YEC bluster but woefully short on positive evidence. All experiments do, asshole. And don't talk about positive evidence, loser. Your position doesn't have any. What limits evolutionary change? Genetics. Heck you and yours don't have a mechanism capable of producing eukaryotes. Yours is a complete non-starter "All experiments do" yet assface Joke Gallien can't name a single one!   :D Lenski's experiment, for starters. And again all means all. Look them up and stop being such a willfully ignorant ass Lenski's experiments didn't show any genetic limits to change Joke. Driving a car for 1 mile isn't evidence a car can't drive 100 miles over time. Chubs fails again.   :D Wow, bacteria remaining bacteria is evidence for limited change. No new proteins. No new protein machines. All very limited. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,11:19    timmy needs a diaper change. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,11:20    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,11:10) Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:07) Occam's assface complains about positive evidence and its position doesn't have any. Not only that it chokes on all of the positive evidence for ID. Joe  Gallien is cool who knows timmy is an assface loser and momma's thing.  :D Yup, that is about right -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,11:26    Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:18)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,11:09)   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:06)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,11:02)       Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:00)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:58)         Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:51)           Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:49)           Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:46)             Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:44)             Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,07:54) I never said all experiments support ID.                   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 23 2018,04:57)     all experiments and observations support baraminology What evidence supports baraminology and not ID Chubs? If all the evidence and observations supports baraminology why isn't the DI and all the IDiots like you supportinging baraminology? Oh, that's right.  You are a YEC.   The experiments allow for evolution by means of blind and mindless processes How do those experiments support baraminology Chubs? Put down your Krispy Kreme and answer the question. Already answered, assface. They all show there are severe limits to evolutionary processes. And nothing shows Common Descent is possible. What experiment shows a limit to evolutionary processes Chubs?  What is the physical mechanism of that limit? You're long on YEC bluster but woefully short on positive evidence. All experiments do, asshole. And don't talk about positive evidence, loser. Your position doesn't have any. What limits evolutionary change? Genetics. Heck you and yours don't have a mechanism capable of producing eukaryotes. Yours is a complete non-starter "All experiments do" yet assface Joke Gallien can't name a single one!   Lenski's experiment, for starters. And again all means all. Look them up and stop being such a willfully ignorant ass Lenski's experiments didn't show any genetic limits to change Joke. Driving a car for 1 mile isn't evidence a car can't drive 100 miles over time. Chubs fails again.   Wow, bacteria remaining bacteria is evidence for limited change. No new proteins. No new protein machines. All very limited. Sorry assface Joke there was no genetic limit shown.   The results of an extremely small 30 year experiment don't show any limits to what life can do over close to 4 billion years. Chubby moron fails again. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,11:27    Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:20)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,11:10) Joe  Gallien is an ass-faced liar who eats shit sandwiches for all his meals   Yup, that is about right Yep, it's exactly right. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,11:32    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,11:26) Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:18)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,11:09)     Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:06)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,11:02)       Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:00)         Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:58)         Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:51)           Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:49)             Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:46)             Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:44)               Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,07:54) I never said all experiments support ID.                   Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 23 2018,04:57)     all experiments and observations support baraminology What evidence supports baraminology and not ID Chubs? If all the evidence and observations supports baraminology why isn't the DI and all the IDiots like you supportinging baraminology? Oh, that's right.  You are a YEC.   :D The experiments allow for evolution by means of blind and mindless processes How do those experiments support baraminology Chubs? Put down your Krispy Kreme and answer the question. Already answered, assface. They all show there are severe limits to evolutionary processes. And nothing shows Common Descent is possible. What experiment shows a limit to evolutionary processes Chubs?  What is the physical mechanism of that limit? You're long on YEC bluster but woefully short on positive evidence. All experiments do, asshole. And don't talk about positive evidence, loser. Your position doesn't have any. What limits evolutionary change? Genetics. Heck you and yours don't have a mechanism capable of producing eukaryotes. Yours is a complete non-starter "All experiments do" yet assface Joke Gallien can't name a single one!   :D Lenski's experiment, for starters. And again all means all. Look them up and stop being such a willfully ignorant ass Lenski's experiments didn't show any genetic limits to change Joke. Driving a car for 1 mile isn't evidence a car can't drive 100 miles over time. Chubs fails again.   :D Wow, bacteria remaining bacteria is evidence for limited change. No new proteins. No new protein machines. All very limited. Sorry assface Joke there was no genetic limit shown.   The results of an extremely small 30 year experiment don't show any limits to what life can do over close to 4 billion years. Chubby moron fails again. Of course it shows there are limits. There isn't anything that would demonstrate bacteria can ever be anything but bacteria. You don't have a mechanism capable of producing eukaryotes. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Pages: (919) < ... 376 377 378 379 380 [381] 382 383 384 385 386 ... >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard