RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (919) < ... 305 306 307 308 309 [310] 311 312 313 314 315 ... >   
  Topic: Joe G.'s Tardgasm, How long can it last?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:37   

Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,10:18)
Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,12:15)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,10:06)
 
Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,12:05)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,10:01)
   
Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,12:00)
     
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,09:55)
https://www.mathsisfun.com/definit....ty.html

http://home.avvanta.com/~math......ability

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......ability

So where is your reference defining probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy?  It's none of those.

First link:

Probability is the chance that something will happen -

Dumbass Johnny strikes again

"The chance that something will happen" and "something that has a chance" have different meanings, at least in English.  In Joeish, who knows?

P,lease explain the alleged differences. Your say-so isn't any good and we all know that you are a piece-of-shit loser

OK, Joe.  I forgot the level of education I was dealing with here.

"The chance that something will happen" is a decent definition of probability, as in

 The probability that Joe will admit he is wrong, based on empirical evidence, is zero.

But if probability is "something that has a chance"?  That would mean that probability is the thing having the chance to occur, not the chance itself.  So in the above sentence, the probability would be "Joe admitting he is wrong," not "zero."  Which makes no sense to anyone, except possibly you.

Have you got that now, or would you like me to try again with shorter words?

LoL! Thankfully you aren't a teacher. If something has a chance that would mean there is a chance that it will happen.

That means "The chance that something will happen" is the same as "something that has a chance".

Brilliant, Joe.  English redefined!

So "the idiot being laughed at" means the same as "the people laughing at the idiot."  That must be why frequency = wavelength.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
JonF



Posts: 634
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:37   

Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,11:06)
Quote (JonF @ June 23 2015,13:23)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,13:19)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,10:41)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,18:11)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,09:31)
     
Quote (fnxtr @ June 23 2015,17:18)
(shrug)

Okay, Joe. You're right, we're wrong. There's a designer. CSI/dFDIWLEN/whatever proves it.

Now what?

Well now you claim frequency = wavelength
probability of zero is non existant (snikker)
The designer is Allah
ticks are vegetarian
Call everyone a homo HOMO!!

THAT'S WHAT!

Yes if you have the wavelength then you have the frequency. Zero = impossibility. I never said anything about Allah, obviously Davey is a whining pussy. And just because ticks go on watermelon doesn't mean they are vegetarian. Davey is an ignorant pussy.

Joe what's the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel? Stupid stupid man. And if Allah isn't the designer what is? As far as the ticks go you are the expert hahahahahah.

I don't have the wavelength, Davey. If you have it then just do the calculation you moron. Frequency = 1/T where T is the time it takes for one wavelength to be completed.

Absolutely.

Therefore frequency does not equal wavelength since you cannot derive one from the other without more information.

Sorry, had to use words with more that three letters.  Maybe you can figure it out anyway if you try real hard.

Frequency and wavelength represent the SAME wave. They are different numerical representations of the SAME thing. If you have one you have the other.

Sure, Joey.

Given a wavelength of 1 meter, what's the frequency?

Answer: cannot be determined from the information provided.

As you acknowledged.

Therefore, given one you do not have the other unless you have more information.


  
JonF



Posts: 634
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:40   

Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,11:08)
Quote (JonF @ June 23 2015,13:24)
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,13:21)
 
Quote (JonF @ June 23 2015,11:11)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,11:14)
   
Quote (JonF @ June 23 2015,08:07)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 22 2015,16:24)
     
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 22 2015,15:08)
     
Quote (Woodbine @ June 22 2015,15:05)
Hey, Joe....I've just checked in with the guys at the lab and you should see the size of the number they've found....it's massive!

Today Chubs also announced that you can't have a probability be zero.  But compared to his other stupidity that's nothing...  ;)

I said zero equals an impossibility. Richie already posted a reference that says a probability is between zero and one. Is zero between zero and one?

Depends, did he mean "between zero and one inclusive" or "between zero and one exclusive"?

Hint: the former.

Mathematicians recognize both closed and open intervals. Duh.

"Between" has a specific meaning.

In probability/math it has two meanings; open interval or closed interval.

In this case which is meant is intuitively obvious to the most casual observer, assuming that observer has two or more functioning brain cells.

That explains why you couldn't figure it out.

If it isn't mentioned then it is exclusive. Do impossible events have a probability?

If it isn't mentioned it's derived from context.  When the context is probability, "between zero and one" is always inclusive.

Duh.

If probability is defined as something that has a chance, AND impossible means that there isn't a chance, how can something impossible have a probability?

Do tell.

Probability is not defined as something that has a chance.  Why do you bother making up that crap?

Oh, I forgot, it's because you have no answer but you just can't stand o walk away.  So you try to change the subject.

As shown upthread, probabilities are always between zero and one inclusive.

Therefore you are wrong claiming that saying a probability is between zero and one does not include zero or one is wrong.

  
JonF



Posts: 634
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:42   

Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,11:20)
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:19)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:17)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:16)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:13)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:10)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:06)
     
Quote (JonF @ June 23 2015,13:23)
     
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,13:19)
       
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,10:41)
       
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,18:11)
         
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,09:31)
         
Quote (fnxtr @ June 23 2015,17:18)
(shrug)

Okay, Joe. You're right, we're wrong. There's a designer. CSI/dFDIWLEN/whatever proves it.

Now what?

Well now you claim frequency = wavelength
probability of zero is non existant (snikker)
The designer is Allah
ticks are vegetarian
Call everyone a homo HOMO!!

THAT'S WHAT!

Yes if you have the wavelength then you have the frequency. Zero = impossibility. I never said anything about Allah, obviously Davey is a whining pussy. And just because ticks go on watermelon doesn't mean they are vegetarian. Davey is an ignorant pussy.

Joe what's the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel? Stupid stupid man. And if Allah isn't the designer what is? As far as the ticks go you are the expert hahahahahah.

I don't have the wavelength, Davey. If you have it then just do the calculation you moron. Frequency = 1/T where T is the time it takes for one wavelength to be completed.

Absolutely.

Therefore frequency does not equal wavelength since you cannot derive one from the other without more information.

Sorry, had to use words with more that three letters.  Maybe you can figure it out anyway if you try real hard.

Frequency and wavelength represent the SAME wave. They are different numerical representations of the SAME thing. If you have one you have the other.

False Joe one canot be derived from the other. Otherwise you would be able to tell me the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel.

But since you think science sunject should be taught in social studie class maybe that's where you learn't physics?

I derive one from the other all the time.

   
Quote
Otherwise you would be able to tell me the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel.


I don't have it, asshole. You are untrustworthy and what you say is meaningless.

It is a FACT that my kid was taught about evolution is social studies.

Joe it's THE SAME WAVE what is the frequency?

I don't have it, Davey. Why are you such a fucking asshole?

So you were LYING when you said you derive one from the other all the time or do you have a short memory?

No, Davey, you are retarded. If I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency 100% of the time.

Cool!

The wavelength is 10 meters.  What's the frequency?

Oops, Joey's caught again.  But he absolutely cannot admit it, he'll just continue to post contradictory claims. Pathetic.

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:43   

Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,12:37)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,10:18)
 
Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,12:15)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,10:06)
   
Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,12:05)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,10:01)
     
Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,12:00)
     
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,09:55)
https://www.mathsisfun.com/definit....ty.html

http://home.avvanta.com/~math......ability

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......ability

So where is your reference defining probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy?  It's none of those.

First link:

Probability is the chance that something will happen -

Dumbass Johnny strikes again

"The chance that something will happen" and "something that has a chance" have different meanings, at least in English.  In Joeish, who knows?

P,lease explain the alleged differences. Your say-so isn't any good and we all know that you are a piece-of-shit loser

OK, Joe.  I forgot the level of education I was dealing with here.

"The chance that something will happen" is a decent definition of probability, as in

 The probability that Joe will admit he is wrong, based on empirical evidence, is zero.

But if probability is "something that has a chance"?  That would mean that probability is the thing having the chance to occur, not the chance itself.  So in the above sentence, the probability would be "Joe admitting he is wrong," not "zero."  Which makes no sense to anyone, except possibly you.

Have you got that now, or would you like me to try again with shorter words?

LoL! Thankfully you aren't a teacher. If something has a chance that would mean there is a chance that it will happen.

That means "The chance that something will happen" is the same as "something that has a chance".

Brilliant, Joe.  English redefined!

So "the idiot being laughed at" means the same as "the people laughing at the idiot."  That must be why frequency = wavelength.

Fuck you and your said false accusations and your false analogies.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
JonF



Posts: 634
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:44   

Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,11:45)
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:43)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:37)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:34)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:29)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:28)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:24)
     
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:22)
     
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:20)
       
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:19)
       
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:17)
         
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:16)
         
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:13)
           
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:10)
           
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:06)
             
Quote (JonF @ June 23 2015,13:23)
             
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,13:19)
               
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,10:41)
               
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,18:11)
                 
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,09:31)
                 
Quote (fnxtr @ June 23 2015,17:18)
(shrug)

Okay, Joe. You're right, we're wrong. There's a designer. CSI/dFDIWLEN/whatever proves it.

Now what?

Well now you claim frequency = wavelength
probability of zero is non existant (snikker)
The designer is Allah
ticks are vegetarian
Call everyone a homo HOMO!!

THAT'S WHAT!

Yes if you have the wavelength then you have the frequency. Zero = impossibility. I never said anything about Allah, obviously Davey is a whining pussy. And just because ticks go on watermelon doesn't mean they are vegetarian. Davey is an ignorant pussy.

Joe what's the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel? Stupid stupid man. And if Allah isn't the designer what is? As far as the ticks go you are the expert hahahahahah.

I don't have the wavelength, Davey. If you have it then just do the calculation you moron. Frequency = 1/T where T is the time it takes for one wavelength to be completed.

Absolutely.

Therefore frequency does not equal wavelength since you cannot derive one from the other without more information.

Sorry, had to use words with more that three letters.  Maybe you can figure it out anyway if you try real hard.

Frequency and wavelength represent the SAME wave. They are different numerical representations of the SAME thing. If you have one you have the other.

False Joe one canot be derived from the other. Otherwise you would be able to tell me the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel.

But since you think science sunject should be taught in social studie class maybe that's where you learn't physics?

I derive one from the other all the time.

           
Quote
Otherwise you would be able to tell me the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel.


I don't have it, asshole. You are untrustworthy and what you say is meaningless.

It is a FACT that my kid was taught about evolution is social studies.

Joe it's THE SAME WAVE what is the frequency?

I don't have it, Davey. Why are you such a fucking asshole?

So you were LYING when you said you derive one from the other all the time or do you have a short memory?

No, Davey, you are retarded. If I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency 100% of the time.

So you have failed to answer the question 0% for Joe again. And points off for lying.

No, Davey, you are a retard. I have been specific and you have tried to change what I have said. Points off for being a dishonest punk.

Really? You said you coul derive the frequency 100% of the time and yet you failed is that still 100%?

Really, if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency 100% of the time.

You could do it also if you weren't such an ignorant asshole.

You seem to have a comprehension problem.

I'll repeat the question since you seem to have missed it.

What is the frequency of a wave 10 meters in length in a block of steel?

100% Fail Joe because you can't answer it.

YOU have the problem, Davey. I have to have the wavelength, Davey. You spewing something is meaningless.

 
Quote
What is the frequency of a wave 10 meters in length in a block of steel?


I don't have it so I cannot answer, dipshit

Joe the wavelength is 10 meters are you dyslexic?

Davey, I did NOT say if someone spewed a wavelength I could tell the frequency.

I said if I HAVE the wavelength then I can derive the frequency. Obviously English is not your native language.

Here's the wavelength, Joey:  10 meters.

Now you have the wavelength.

What's the frequency?

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:45   

Quote (JonF @ June 24 2015,12:42)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,11:20)
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:19)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:17)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:16)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:13)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:10)
     
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:06)
     
Quote (JonF @ June 23 2015,13:23)
       
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,13:19)
       
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,10:41)
         
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,18:11)
         
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,09:31)
           
Quote (fnxtr @ June 23 2015,17:18)
(shrug)

Okay, Joe. You're right, we're wrong. There's a designer. CSI/dFDIWLEN/whatever proves it.

Now what?

Well now you claim frequency = wavelength
probability of zero is non existant (snikker)
The designer is Allah
ticks are vegetarian
Call everyone a homo HOMO!!

THAT'S WHAT!

Yes if you have the wavelength then you have the frequency. Zero = impossibility. I never said anything about Allah, obviously Davey is a whining pussy. And just because ticks go on watermelon doesn't mean they are vegetarian. Davey is an ignorant pussy.

Joe what's the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel? Stupid stupid man. And if Allah isn't the designer what is? As far as the ticks go you are the expert hahahahahah.

I don't have the wavelength, Davey. If you have it then just do the calculation you moron. Frequency = 1/T where T is the time it takes for one wavelength to be completed.

Absolutely.

Therefore frequency does not equal wavelength since you cannot derive one from the other without more information.

Sorry, had to use words with more that three letters.  Maybe you can figure it out anyway if you try real hard.

Frequency and wavelength represent the SAME wave. They are different numerical representations of the SAME thing. If you have one you have the other.

False Joe one canot be derived from the other. Otherwise you would be able to tell me the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel.

But since you think science sunject should be taught in social studie class maybe that's where you learn't physics?

I derive one from the other all the time.

     
Quote
Otherwise you would be able to tell me the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel.


I don't have it, asshole. You are untrustworthy and what you say is meaningless.

It is a FACT that my kid was taught about evolution is social studies.

Joe it's THE SAME WAVE what is the frequency?

I don't have it, Davey. Why are you such a fucking asshole?

So you were LYING when you said you derive one from the other all the time or do you have a short memory?

No, Davey, you are retarded. If I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency 100% of the time.

Cool!

The wavelength is 10 meters.  What's the frequency?

Oops, Joey's caught again.  But he absolutely cannot admit it, he'll just continue to post contradictory claims. Pathetic.

I HAVE TO HAVE IT. I DO NOT HAVE THE WAVE AND YOUR SAY-SO IS MEANINGLESS.

How many fucking times do I have to tell you assholes that?

If someone is looking at a wave- at least one complete wave- on an oscilloscope does that person have both the frequency and wavelength right there in that same wave? Yes or no

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:45   

Quote (JonF @ June 24 2015,12:40)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,11:08)
Quote (JonF @ June 23 2015,13:24)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,13:21)
 
Quote (JonF @ June 23 2015,11:11)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,11:14)
   
Quote (JonF @ June 23 2015,08:07)
     
Quote (Joe G @ June 22 2015,16:24)
     
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 22 2015,15:08)
       
Quote (Woodbine @ June 22 2015,15:05)
Hey, Joe....I've just checked in with the guys at the lab and you should see the size of the number they've found....it's massive!

Today Chubs also announced that you can't have a probability be zero.  But compared to his other stupidity that's nothing...  ;)

I said zero equals an impossibility. Richie already posted a reference that says a probability is between zero and one. Is zero between zero and one?

Depends, did he mean "between zero and one inclusive" or "between zero and one exclusive"?

Hint: the former.

Mathematicians recognize both closed and open intervals. Duh.

"Between" has a specific meaning.

In probability/math it has two meanings; open interval or closed interval.

In this case which is meant is intuitively obvious to the most casual observer, assuming that observer has two or more functioning brain cells.

That explains why you couldn't figure it out.

If it isn't mentioned then it is exclusive. Do impossible events have a probability?

If it isn't mentioned it's derived from context.  When the context is probability, "between zero and one" is always inclusive.

Duh.

If probability is defined as something that has a chance, AND impossible means that there isn't a chance, how can something impossible have a probability?

Do tell.

Probability is not defined as something that has a chance.  Why do you bother making up that crap?

Oh, I forgot, it's because you have no answer but you just can't stand o walk away.  So you try to change the subject.

As shown upthread, probabilities are always between zero and one inclusive.

Therefore you are wrong claiming that saying a probability is between zero and one does not include zero or one is wrong.

DEFINE PROBABILITY OR SHUT THE FUCK UP

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:47   

Quote (JonF @ June 24 2015,12:40)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,11:08)
Quote (JonF @ June 23 2015,13:24)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,13:21)
 
Quote (JonF @ June 23 2015,11:11)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,11:14)
   
Quote (JonF @ June 23 2015,08:07)
     
Quote (Joe G @ June 22 2015,16:24)
     
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 22 2015,15:08)
       
Quote (Woodbine @ June 22 2015,15:05)
Hey, Joe....I've just checked in with the guys at the lab and you should see the size of the number they've found....it's massive!

Today Chubs also announced that you can't have a probability be zero.  But compared to his other stupidity that's nothing...  ;)

I said zero equals an impossibility. Richie already posted a reference that says a probability is between zero and one. Is zero between zero and one?

Depends, did he mean "between zero and one inclusive" or "between zero and one exclusive"?

Hint: the former.

Mathematicians recognize both closed and open intervals. Duh.

"Between" has a specific meaning.

In probability/math it has two meanings; open interval or closed interval.

In this case which is meant is intuitively obvious to the most casual observer, assuming that observer has two or more functioning brain cells.

That explains why you couldn't figure it out.

If it isn't mentioned then it is exclusive. Do impossible events have a probability?

If it isn't mentioned it's derived from context.  When the context is probability, "between zero and one" is always inclusive.

Duh.

If probability is defined as something that has a chance, AND impossible means that there isn't a chance, how can something impossible have a probability?

Do tell.

Probability is not defined as something that has a chance.  Why do you bother making up that crap?

Oh, I forgot, it's because you have no answer but you just can't stand o walk away.  So you try to change the subject.

As shown upthread, probabilities are always between zero and one inclusive.

Therefore you are wrong claiming that saying a probability is between zero and one does not include zero or one is wrong.

Impossible things do not have a probability.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
JonF



Posts: 634
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:49   

Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,12:05)
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:03)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:59)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:55)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:52)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:50)
Well that was fun Joe 100% FAIL  on math and reading PLUS the designer is some dude call Spetner.

Yes, Davey, we already know that you are an ignorant asshole who couldn't follow along if its life depended on it. And you are a LIAR.

What math did I fail, Davey? What reading did I fail, Davey? Where did I say that Spetner was the designer, Davey?

Please be specific, show your work or admit that you are just another pathetic evoTARD.

10 meters wavelength Joe 100% fail

Again you prove that you are a dishonest freak. Is your dishonesty supposed to mean something?

Mr toaster repair man lose his calculator?

http://www.dxing.com/frequen....enc.htm

 
Quote
There are different ways to indicate where to find a certain station on a radio dial. For example, we could say that a station is operating on 9680 kiloHertz (kHz), 9.68 megahertz (MHz), or on 31 meters. And all three ways would be correct!


Wow, that agrees with what I said!

Not even close.  equivalent representations are not necessarily equal.  

1 meter is equivalent to 32.80839895013 to feet.  32.80839895013 does not equal 1.  Duh.

Of course with a reasonable assumption I could tell you the frequency of a 10 meter wavelength in a block of steel. But you can't.  And without that assumption/information, you are lost.


  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:50   

Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,12:26)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,20:19)
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,12:15)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,20:02)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,12:02)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:59)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:57)
     
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:52)
     
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:50)
       
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:43)
       
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:35)
         
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)
         
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:29)
           
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:22)
           
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:19)
             
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:12)
               
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:11)
               
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:05)
                 
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:03)
                 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:59)
                   
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:55)
                   
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:52)
                     
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:50)
Well that was fun Joe 100% FAIL  on math and reading PLUS the designer is some dude call Spetner.

Yes, Davey, we already know that you are an ignorant asshole who couldn't follow along if its life depended on it. And you are a LIAR.

What math did I fail, Davey? What reading did I fail, Davey? Where did I say that Spetner was the designer, Davey?

Please be specific, show your work or admit that you are just another pathetic evoTARD.

10 meters wavelength Joe 100% fail

Again you prove that you are a dishonest freak. Is your dishonesty supposed to mean something?

Mr toaster repair man lose his calculator?

http://www.dxing.com/frequen....enc.htm

                 
Quote
There are different ways to indicate where to find a certain station on a radio dial. For example, we could say that a station is operating on 9680 kiloHertz (kHz), 9.68 megahertz (MHz), or on 31 meters. And all three ways would be correct!


Wow, that agrees with what I said!

OK so what you meant to say was an Electromagnetic Wave with a speed of 300,000,000 kilometers per hour in free space.

What is the frequency of that same wave in coaxial cable with a velocity factor of 0.7? Hint it's different.

Your desperation is still showing. Do you understand English or not?

What everyone else except you get Joe is that frequency of a wave is dependent on more than length. It is dependent on speed and the permeability of the transmission medium as well as the wavelength.

And seriously using a cherry picked quote from some piss ant lay website when Wiki has the full story.

All class Joe.

Davey, go fuck yourself. I know what the frequency is depended on. That is why I made my SPECIFIC claim.

Lamda = Speed / Frequency

its on wikipedia Joe except I didn't have to look it up.

You know what lamda is right Joe?

Maybe you should get someone to read it to you one day what with your dyslexia.

Yes, davey, we know all of that. Again that is why I made a specific claim- a claim that you are desperately trying to change.

1/T works

The claim was FALSE you made an assumption.

Lambda = speed x 1 second.


Where do you think the 1/T came from Moron.

1/T works, moron, regardless of the medium.

My claim still holds- if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency. They are two different numerical representations of the SAME wave

I see where the problem is here.

In physics there is a difference in meaning between 1/T and 1/t.

No Joe the speed of a wave is dependent on permeability of the medium the wavelength changes inmedium and the frequency remains constant wrt a vacuum.

Basic stuff mr toaster repair man

You are still not saying anything we didn't already know. 1/T still works, moron.

False Joe your 1/t is one second you don't kneed to write 1/t (T is Temp but you knew that Joe RIGHT?)

Hey Joes toothless cousins give Joe a clap for being a cunt.

No, davey, it is T as in 1/T for the frequency.

Joe take some night classes you might learn something. You should be able to fit it in between car stealing and ICE cooking.

You need the classes, moron. I provided a reference that supports my claim

That reference refers to the 31 meter short wave band which covers several Megahertz it is not the actual wavelength.

True but it shows we can interchange them- wavelength and frequency and still be talking about the SAME wave.

different dimensions are not interchangable

They aren't different dimensions. They are different numerical representations of the same wave. Every specific wavelength has one and only one specific frequency.

A person observing a wave on an oscilloscope has both right there in the same wave.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
JonF



Posts: 634
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:51   

Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,12:06)
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:05)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:03)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:02)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:59)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:54)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:45)
     
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:43)
     
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:37)
       
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:34)
       
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:29)
         
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:28)
         
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:24)
           
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:22)
           
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:20)
             
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:19)
             
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:17)
               
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:16)
               
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:13)
                 
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:10)
                 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:06)
                   
Quote (JonF @ June 23 2015,13:23)
                   
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,13:19)
                     
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,10:41)
                     
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,18:11)
                       
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,09:31)
                       
Quote (fnxtr @ June 23 2015,17:18)
(shrug)

Okay, Joe. You're right, we're wrong. There's a designer. CSI/dFDIWLEN/whatever proves it.

Now what?

Well now you claim frequency = wavelength
probability of zero is non existant (snikker)
The designer is Allah
ticks are vegetarian
Call everyone a homo HOMO!!

THAT'S WHAT!

Yes if you have the wavelength then you have the frequency. Zero = impossibility. I never said anything about Allah, obviously Davey is a whining pussy. And just because ticks go on watermelon doesn't mean they are vegetarian. Davey is an ignorant pussy.

Joe what's the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel? Stupid stupid man. And if Allah isn't the designer what is? As far as the ticks go you are the expert hahahahahah.

I don't have the wavelength, Davey. If you have it then just do the calculation you moron. Frequency = 1/T where T is the time it takes for one wavelength to be completed.

Absolutely.

Therefore frequency does not equal wavelength since you cannot derive one from the other without more information.

Sorry, had to use words with more that three letters.  Maybe you can figure it out anyway if you try real hard.

Frequency and wavelength represent the SAME wave. They are different numerical representations of the SAME thing. If you have one you have the other.

False Joe one canot be derived from the other. Otherwise you would be able to tell me the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel.

But since you think science sunject should be taught in social studie class maybe that's where you learn't physics?

I derive one from the other all the time.

                 
Quote
Otherwise you would be able to tell me the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel.


I don't have it, asshole. You are untrustworthy and what you say is meaningless.

It is a FACT that my kid was taught about evolution is social studies.

Joe it's THE SAME WAVE what is the frequency?

I don't have it, Davey. Why are you such a fucking asshole?

So you were LYING when you said you derive one from the other all the time or do you have a short memory?

No, Davey, you are retarded. If I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency 100% of the time.

So you have failed to answer the question 0% for Joe again. And points off for lying.

No, Davey, you are a retard. I have been specific and you have tried to change what I have said. Points off for being a dishonest punk.

Really? You said you coul derive the frequency 100% of the time and yet you failed is that still 100%?

Really, if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency 100% of the time.

You could do it also if you weren't such an ignorant asshole.

You seem to have a comprehension problem.

I'll repeat the question since you seem to have missed it.

What is the frequency of a wave 10 meters in length in a block of steel?

100% Fail Joe because you can't answer it.

YOU have the problem, Davey. I have to have the wavelength, Davey. You spewing something is meaningless.

       
Quote
What is the frequency of a wave 10 meters in length in a block of steel?


I don't have it so I cannot answer, dipshit

Joe the wavelength is 10 meters are you dyslexic?

Davey, I did NOT say if someone spewed a wavelength I could tell the frequency.

I said if I HAVE the wavelength then I can derive the frequency. Obviously English is not your native language.

There are people reading this blog who could calculate the frequency by making an educated gues on the missing factors Joe and yet you can't. Why is that Joe? Why don't you give us an example where you calculate frequency from a wavelenght. And I'll show you why you are still wrong.

Fuck you, asshole. I made a SPECIFIC claim and you are trying to change it. Readers can see that too, moron.

Show your working Joe becuse your claim IS NOT SPECIFIC

What are you scared of.

You can't do sums in public?

My claim is if I have a wavelength then I and anyone else can derive the frequency.

Unless you can provide evidence (a simple formula ) then your claim is false.

And Joe everyone on the innernets will see that you have been pwned.

Frequency = 1/T, just as I posted yesterday. T is the period it takes for one wavelength to be completed.

Ah, so a 10 meter wave in a block of steel has a frequency of 0.1 meters?


  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:51   

Quote (JonF @ June 24 2015,12:49)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,12:05)
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:03)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:59)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:55)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:52)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:50)
Well that was fun Joe 100% FAIL  on math and reading PLUS the designer is some dude call Spetner.

Yes, Davey, we already know that you are an ignorant asshole who couldn't follow along if its life depended on it. And you are a LIAR.

What math did I fail, Davey? What reading did I fail, Davey? Where did I say that Spetner was the designer, Davey?

Please be specific, show your work or admit that you are just another pathetic evoTARD.

10 meters wavelength Joe 100% fail

Again you prove that you are a dishonest freak. Is your dishonesty supposed to mean something?

Mr toaster repair man lose his calculator?

http://www.dxing.com/frequen....enc.htm

 
Quote
There are different ways to indicate where to find a certain station on a radio dial. For example, we could say that a station is operating on 9680 kiloHertz (kHz), 9.68 megahertz (MHz), or on 31 meters. And all three ways would be correct!


Wow, that agrees with what I said!

Not even close.  equivalent representations are not necessarily equal.  

1 meter is equivalent to 32.80839895013 to feet.  32.80839895013 does not equal 1.  Duh.

Of course with a reasonable assumption I could tell you the frequency of a 10 meter wavelength in a block of steel. But you can't.  And without that assumption/information, you are lost.

img]http://www.outofregs.com/postImages/1328654288.jpg[/img]

JonF, do TRY to follow along. Frequency and wavelength are different numerical representations of the same wave. Grow up and get over it.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:52   

Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,10:47)
Impossible things do not have a probability.

Yes they do, Joe.  Guess what it is?

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:53   

Quote (JonF @ June 24 2015,12:51)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,12:06)
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:05)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:03)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:02)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:59)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:54)
     
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:45)
     
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:43)
       
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:37)
       
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:34)
         
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:29)
         
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:28)
           
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:24)
           
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:22)
             
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:20)
             
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:19)
               
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:17)
               
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:16)
                 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:13)
                 
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:10)
                   
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:06)
                   
Quote (JonF @ June 23 2015,13:23)
                     
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,13:19)
                     
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,10:41)
                       
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,18:11)
                       
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,09:31)
                         
Quote (fnxtr @ June 23 2015,17:18)
(shrug)

Okay, Joe. You're right, we're wrong. There's a designer. CSI/dFDIWLEN/whatever proves it.

Now what?

Well now you claim frequency = wavelength
probability of zero is non existant (snikker)
The designer is Allah
ticks are vegetarian
Call everyone a homo HOMO!!

THAT'S WHAT!

Yes if you have the wavelength then you have the frequency. Zero = impossibility. I never said anything about Allah, obviously Davey is a whining pussy. And just because ticks go on watermelon doesn't mean they are vegetarian. Davey is an ignorant pussy.

Joe what's the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel? Stupid stupid man. And if Allah isn't the designer what is? As far as the ticks go you are the expert hahahahahah.

I don't have the wavelength, Davey. If you have it then just do the calculation you moron. Frequency = 1/T where T is the time it takes for one wavelength to be completed.

Absolutely.

Therefore frequency does not equal wavelength since you cannot derive one from the other without more information.

Sorry, had to use words with more that three letters.  Maybe you can figure it out anyway if you try real hard.

Frequency and wavelength represent the SAME wave. They are different numerical representations of the SAME thing. If you have one you have the other.

False Joe one canot be derived from the other. Otherwise you would be able to tell me the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel.

But since you think science sunject should be taught in social studie class maybe that's where you learn't physics?

I derive one from the other all the time.

                   
Quote
Otherwise you would be able to tell me the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel.


I don't have it, asshole. You are untrustworthy and what you say is meaningless.

It is a FACT that my kid was taught about evolution is social studies.

Joe it's THE SAME WAVE what is the frequency?

I don't have it, Davey. Why are you such a fucking asshole?

So you were LYING when you said you derive one from the other all the time or do you have a short memory?

No, Davey, you are retarded. If I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency 100% of the time.

So you have failed to answer the question 0% for Joe again. And points off for lying.

No, Davey, you are a retard. I have been specific and you have tried to change what I have said. Points off for being a dishonest punk.

Really? You said you coul derive the frequency 100% of the time and yet you failed is that still 100%?

Really, if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency 100% of the time.

You could do it also if you weren't such an ignorant asshole.

You seem to have a comprehension problem.

I'll repeat the question since you seem to have missed it.

What is the frequency of a wave 10 meters in length in a block of steel?

100% Fail Joe because you can't answer it.

YOU have the problem, Davey. I have to have the wavelength, Davey. You spewing something is meaningless.

         
Quote
What is the frequency of a wave 10 meters in length in a block of steel?


I don't have it so I cannot answer, dipshit

Joe the wavelength is 10 meters are you dyslexic?

Davey, I did NOT say if someone spewed a wavelength I could tell the frequency.

I said if I HAVE the wavelength then I can derive the frequency. Obviously English is not your native language.

There are people reading this blog who could calculate the frequency by making an educated gues on the missing factors Joe and yet you can't. Why is that Joe? Why don't you give us an example where you calculate frequency from a wavelenght. And I'll show you why you are still wrong.

Fuck you, asshole. I made a SPECIFIC claim and you are trying to change it. Readers can see that too, moron.

Show your working Joe becuse your claim IS NOT SPECIFIC

What are you scared of.

You can't do sums in public?

My claim is if I have a wavelength then I and anyone else can derive the frequency.

Unless you can provide evidence (a simple formula ) then your claim is false.

And Joe everyone on the innernets will see that you have been pwned.

Frequency = 1/T, just as I posted yesterday. T is the period it takes for one wavelength to be completed.

Ah, so a 10 meter wave in a block of steel has a frequency of 0.1 meters?


What? T = period as in the time it takes for the wave to complete one cycle.

1/T where 1 = 1 complete wave and T is the time it took


Grow up

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:54   

Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,12:52)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,10:47)
Impossible things do not have a probability.

Yes they do, Joe.  Guess what it is?

No, they don't Johnny. Unless you want to redefine words.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
JonF



Posts: 634
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:54   

Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,12:21)
Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,11:13)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,08:08)
If probability is defined as something that has a chance, AND impossible means that there isn't a chance, how can something impossible have a probability?

Do tell.

As the rest of us don't define probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy, this is a question that can only be answered by the world's leadingonly authority on Joemath, i.e. you.

Maybe you should go talk to Gary Gaulin, Joe.  He has a making-shit-up personal version of science.  You have a making-shit-up personal version of mathematics.  Looks like a fit.

Well Johnny, I found a reference that defines it that way. So you lose, asshole

No, you didn't.  You did not provide any reference, all that you got is unfounded assertions.

But that definition does appear, as a second possibility behind "the chance that something will happen".

In the English language, when we encounter a word that has multiple meanings, we derive the correct meaning from context.

Someday you should learn English.

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:57   

Quote (JonF @ June 24 2015,12:54)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,12:21)
Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,11:13)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,08:08)
If probability is defined as something that has a chance, AND impossible means that there isn't a chance, how can something impossible have a probability?

Do tell.

As the rest of us don't define probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy, this is a question that can only be answered by the world's leadingonly authority on Joemath, i.e. you.

Maybe you should go talk to Gary Gaulin, Joe.  He has a making-shit-up personal version of science.  You have a making-shit-up personal version of mathematics.  Looks like a fit.

Well Johnny, I found a reference that defines it that way. So you lose, asshole

No, you didn't.  You did not provide any reference, all that you got is unfounded assertions.

But that definition does appear, as a second possibility behind "the chance that something will happen".

In the English language, when we encounter a word that has multiple meanings, we derive the correct meaning from context.

Someday you should learn English.

Yes, I did. You are just willfully ignorant. And yes we do derive the correct meaning from context. Tell Ogre MKV that as he didn't know.

Context is what has design being a mechanism.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
JonF



Posts: 634
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:57   

Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,12:25)
Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,11:13)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,08:08)
If probability is defined as something that has a chance, AND impossible means that there isn't a chance, how can something impossible have a probability?

Do tell.

As the rest of us don't define probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy, this is a question that can only be answered by the world's leadingonly authority on Joemath, i.e. you.

Maybe you should go talk to Gary Gaulin, Joe.  He has a making-shit-up personal version of science.  You have a making-shit-up personal version of mathematics.  Looks like a fit.

Define probability, then. And back it up with a reference. IOr shut up

Probability

Quote
1. the chance that something will happen

2. something that has a chance of happening

3. a measure of how often a particular event will happen if something (such as tossing a coin) is done repeatedly


Note especially the first definition.  If you think the second is more applicable, why? Huh?

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:58   

Quote (JonF @ June 24 2015,12:57)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,12:25)
Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,11:13)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,08:08)
If probability is defined as something that has a chance, AND impossible means that there isn't a chance, how can something impossible have a probability?

Do tell.

As the rest of us don't define probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy, this is a question that can only be answered by the world's leadingonly authority on Joemath, i.e. you.

Maybe you should go talk to Gary Gaulin, Joe.  He has a making-shit-up personal version of science.  You have a making-shit-up personal version of mathematics.  Looks like a fit.

Define probability, then. And back it up with a reference. IOr shut up

Probability

Quote
1. the chance that something will happen

2. something that has a chance of happening

3. a measure of how often a particular event will happen if something (such as tossing a coin) is done repeatedly


Note especially the first definition.  If you think the second is more applicable, why? Huh?

The two are interchangeable.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
JonF



Posts: 634
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,13:01   

Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,12:43)
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:35)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:29)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:22)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:19)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:12)
     
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:11)
       
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:05)
       
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:03)
         
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:59)
         
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:55)
           
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:52)
           
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:50)
Well that was fun Joe 100% FAIL  on math and reading PLUS the designer is some dude call Spetner.

Yes, Davey, we already know that you are an ignorant asshole who couldn't follow along if its life depended on it. And you are a LIAR.

What math did I fail, Davey? What reading did I fail, Davey? Where did I say that Spetner was the designer, Davey?

Please be specific, show your work or admit that you are just another pathetic evoTARD.

10 meters wavelength Joe 100% fail

Again you prove that you are a dishonest freak. Is your dishonesty supposed to mean something?

Mr toaster repair man lose his calculator?

http://www.dxing.com/frequen....enc.htm

         
Quote
There are different ways to indicate where to find a certain station on a radio dial. For example, we could say that a station is operating on 9680 kiloHertz (kHz), 9.68 megahertz (MHz), or on 31 meters. And all three ways would be correct!


Wow, that agrees with what I said!

OK so what you meant to say was an Electromagnetic Wave with a speed of 300,000,000 kilometers per hour in free space.

What is the frequency of that same wave in coaxial cable with a velocity factor of 0.7? Hint it's different.

Your desperation is still showing. Do you understand English or not?

What everyone else except you get Joe is that frequency of a wave is dependent on more than length. It is dependent on speed and the permeability of the transmission medium as well as the wavelength.

And seriously using a cherry picked quote from some piss ant lay website when Wiki has the full story.

All class Joe.

Davey, go fuck yourself. I know what the frequency is depended on. That is why I made my SPECIFIC claim.

Lamda = Speed / Frequency

its on wikipedia Joe except I didn't have to look it up.

You know what lamda is right Joe?

Maybe you should get someone to read it to you one day what with your dyslexia.

Yes, davey, we know all of that. Again that is why I made a specific claim- a claim that you are desperately trying to change.

1/T works

The claim was FALSE you made an assumption.

Lambda = speed x 1 second.


Where do you think the 1/T came from Moron.

1/T works, moron, regardless of the medium.

My claim still holds- if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency. They are two different numerical representations of the SAME wave

So the speed of a 10 meter wavelenght does not depend on the medium?

Wow you're really outdone yurself with stupidity.

The speed depends on the nature of the wave and the medium through which it travels.

You have the wavelength, 10 meters, and even the medium, steel.  Yet all you can do is blather... becaoue you don't even have a clue how to convert wavelength to equivalent but not equal frequency.

Keep it up Joey, you're hilarious.

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,13:06   

Quote (JonF @ June 24 2015,13:01)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,12:43)
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:35)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:29)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:22)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:19)
     
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:12)
       
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:11)
       
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:05)
         
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:03)
         
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:59)
           
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:55)
           
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:52)
             
Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:50)
Well that was fun Joe 100% FAIL  on math and reading PLUS the designer is some dude call Spetner.

Yes, Davey, we already know that you are an ignorant asshole who couldn't follow along if its life depended on it. And you are a LIAR.

What math did I fail, Davey? What reading did I fail, Davey? Where did I say that Spetner was the designer, Davey?

Please be specific, show your work or admit that you are just another pathetic evoTARD.

10 meters wavelength Joe 100% fail

Again you prove that you are a dishonest freak. Is your dishonesty supposed to mean something?

Mr toaster repair man lose his calculator?

http://www.dxing.com/frequen....enc.htm

         
Quote
There are different ways to indicate where to find a certain station on a radio dial. For example, we could say that a station is operating on 9680 kiloHertz (kHz), 9.68 megahertz (MHz), or on 31 meters. And all three ways would be correct!


Wow, that agrees with what I said!

OK so what you meant to say was an Electromagnetic Wave with a speed of 300,000,000 kilometers per hour in free space.

What is the frequency of that same wave in coaxial cable with a velocity factor of 0.7? Hint it's different.

Your desperation is still showing. Do you understand English or not?

What everyone else except you get Joe is that frequency of a wave is dependent on more than length. It is dependent on speed and the permeability of the transmission medium as well as the wavelength.

And seriously using a cherry picked quote from some piss ant lay website when Wiki has the full story.

All class Joe.

Davey, go fuck yourself. I know what the frequency is depended on. That is why I made my SPECIFIC claim.

Lamda = Speed / Frequency

its on wikipedia Joe except I didn't have to look it up.

You know what lamda is right Joe?

Maybe you should get someone to read it to you one day what with your dyslexia.

Yes, davey, we know all of that. Again that is why I made a specific claim- a claim that you are desperately trying to change.

1/T works

The claim was FALSE you made an assumption.

Lambda = speed x 1 second.


Where do you think the 1/T came from Moron.

1/T works, moron, regardless of the medium.

My claim still holds- if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency. They are two different numerical representations of the SAME wave

So the speed of a 10 meter wavelenght does not depend on the medium?

Wow you're really outdone yurself with stupidity.

The speed depends on the nature of the wave and the medium through which it travels.

You have the wavelength, 10 meters, and even the medium, steel.  Yet all you can do is blather... becaoue you don't even have a clue how to convert wavelength to equivalent but not equal frequency.

Keep it up Joey, you're hilarious.

Fuck you, asshole. Way to make shit up and act as if I actually said or implied such a thing.

AGAIN, I DON'T HAVE IT. I NEVER SAID "GIVEN BLAH, BLAH"

1/T- and you choked on that, fuckface

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,13:07   

I HAVE TO HAVE IT. I DO NOT HAVE THE WAVE AND YOUR SAY-SO IS MEANINGLESS.

How many fucking times do I have to tell you assholes that?

If someone is looking at a wave- at least one complete wave- on an oscilloscope does that person have both the frequency and wavelength right there in that same wave? Yes or no


--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
JonF



Posts: 634
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,13:10   

Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,12:55)
https://www.mathsisfun.com/definit....ty.html

"Probability is the chance that something will happen - how likely it is that some event will happen.

Sometimes you can measure a probability with a number like "10% chance of rain", or you can use words such as impossible, unlikely, possible, even chance, likely and certain."
 I.e between zero and one inclusive, and zero is a valid probability.

   
Quote
http://home.avvanta.com/~math......ability


"Probability is the measure of the likeliness that an event will occur.[1] Probability is quantified as a number between 0 and 1 (where 0 indicates impossibility and 1 indicates certainty)."
I.e between zero and one inclusive, and zero is a valid probability.

Quote
URL=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......ability[/URL]

"Probability is the likelihood of something happening in the future. It is expressed as a number between zero (can never happen) to 1 (will always happen)."
I.e between zero and one inclusive, and zero is a valid probability.


  
JonF



Posts: 634
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,13:13   

Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,12:56)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......equency

"Frequency is the number of occurrences of a repeating event per unit time.[1] It is also referred to as temporal frequency, which emphasizes the contrast to spatial frequency and angular frequency. The period is the duration of time of one cycle in a repeating event, so the period {not t wavelength - Jonf} is the reciprocal of the frequency.

...

For periodic waves in nondispersive media (that is, media in which the wave speed is independent of frequency), frequency has an inverse relationship to the wavelength, λ (lambda). Even in dispersive media, the frequency f of a sinusoidal wave is equal to the phase velocity v of the wave divided by the wavelength λ of the wave:

f = v/λ

In the special case of electromagnetic waves moving through a vacuum, then v = c, where c is the speed of light in a vacuum, and this expression becomes:

f = c/λ

When waves from a monochrome source travel from one medium to another, their frequency remains the same—only their wavelength and speed change."

Words fail me.

  
JonF



Posts: 634
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,13:14   

Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,13:00)
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 24 2015,11:58)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,11:43)
1/T works, moron, regardless of the medium.

My claim still holds- if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency. They are two different numerical representations of the SAME wave

And we've already proven, multiple times, that you can't do that.

You are just too arrogant and meglomanical to see it.

What is the frequency of a sound wave with a wavelength of 1 meter?

No, Kevin, you are a moron who couldn't prove anything.

I HAVE TO HAVE THE WAVELENGTH, MORON.

10 meters MORON.

What's the frequency?

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,13:15   

Quote (JonF @ June 24 2015,13:14)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,13:00)
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 24 2015,11:58)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,11:43)
1/T works, moron, regardless of the medium.

My claim still holds- if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency. They are two different numerical representations of the SAME wave

And we've already proven, multiple times, that you can't do that.

You are just too arrogant and meglomanical to see it.

What is the frequency of a sound wave with a wavelength of 1 meter?

No, Kevin, you are a moron who couldn't prove anything.

I HAVE TO HAVE THE WAVELENGTH, MORON.

10 meters MORON.

What's the frequency?

You have reading comprehension issues, asshole.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,13:15   

Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,13:07)
I HAVE TO HAVE IT. I DO NOT HAVE THE WAVE AND YOUR SAY-SO IS MEANINGLESS.

How many fucking times do I have to tell you assholes that?

If someone is looking at a wave- at least one complete wave- on an oscilloscope does that person have both the frequency and wavelength right there in that same wave? Yes or no

Joe, your original claim was never that if you HAVE the wavelength, you also have the frequency, which is not true, but we will leave that aside.

Your original claim was much more simple (much like you)

WAVELENGTH = FREQUENCY

Stop trying to change the subject. Be the bigger man and simply admit that you were wrong when you made this claim.

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,13:16   

Quote (JonF @ June 24 2015,13:13)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,12:56)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......equency

"Frequency is the number of occurrences of a repeating event per unit time.[1] It is also referred to as temporal frequency, which emphasizes the contrast to spatial frequency and angular frequency. The period is the duration of time of one cycle in a repeating event, so the period {not t wavelength - Jonf} is the reciprocal of the frequency.

...

For periodic waves in nondispersive media (that is, media in which the wave speed is independent of frequency), frequency has an inverse relationship to the wavelength, λ (lambda). Even in dispersive media, the frequency f of a sinusoidal wave is equal to the phase velocity v of the wave divided by the wavelength λ of the wave:

f = v/λ

In the special case of electromagnetic waves moving through a vacuum, then v = c, where c is the speed of light in a vacuum, and this expression becomes:

f = c/λ

When waves from a monochrome source travel from one medium to another, their frequency remains the same—only their wavelength and speed change."

Words fail me.

I HAVE TO HAVE IT. I DO NOT HAVE THE WAVE AND YOUR SAY-SO IS MEANINGLESS.

How many fucking times do I have to tell you assholes that?

If someone is looking at a wave- at least one complete wave- on an oscilloscope does that person have both the frequency and wavelength right there in that same wave? Yes or no


--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,13:17   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ June 24 2015,13:15)
Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,13:07)
I HAVE TO HAVE IT. I DO NOT HAVE THE WAVE AND YOUR SAY-SO IS MEANINGLESS.

How many fucking times do I have to tell you assholes that?

If someone is looking at a wave- at least one complete wave- on an oscilloscope does that person have both the frequency and wavelength right there in that same wave? Yes or no

Joe, your original claim was never that if you HAVE the wavelength, you also have the frequency, which is not true, but we will leave that aside.

Your original claim was much more simple (much like you)

WAVELENGTH = FREQUENCY

Stop trying to change the subject. Be the bigger man and simply admit that you were wrong when you made this claim.

I am explaining why frequency=wavelength, moron. I have explained it and you are still too stupid to grasp it.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
  27552 replies since Feb. 24 2010,12:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (919) < ... 305 306 307 308 309 [310] 311 312 313 314 315 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]