Joe G
Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007
|
| Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 31 2015,10:31) | | Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 31 2015,18:06) | | Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 31 2015,08:02) | | Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 31 2015,02:17) | | Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 30 2015,18:14) | | Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 30 2015,18:00) | | Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 30 2015,17:02) | | Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 30 2015,11:48) | | Quote (OgreMkV @ Mar. 29 2015,16:24) | I maintain that forensics is not an ID supporting system mainly because this is how an ID police force would work.
Officer: Yes ma'am, due to various calculations, we've determined that your husband was murdered.
Wife: Do you have any suspects.
Officer: Sorry ma'am, but we don't look for the murder, just determine that he was murdered.
Wife: Can I see your calculations, maybe I could give them to a private detective.
Officer: Sorry ma'am, but you wouldn't understand them.
Wife: Surely you can give them to me. Maybe someone else could understand them.
Officer: I already gave them to you. |
Kevin, just because you are a lowlife loser who couldn't conduct an investigation if your life depended on it, doesn't mean everyone else is too.
You don't look for a murderer until you determine a murder has been committed. And most times that is all the forensics says. The detectives then go about using the forensics to find the murderer.
But then again you know forensics only from CSI shows... |
True, you don't look for a murderer until you know a murder has been committed. Does this mean that you are finally admitting that design in nature is far from conclusive?
Biologists started looking for the mechanism behind evolution shortly after Darwin proposed his theory. Since then they have discovered genetics, mutation, meiosis and mitosis, genetic drift, neutral theory, antibiotic resistance, horizontal gene transfer, transcription, transposition, etc., et ., etc.
And ID has discovered ...??? FIASCO? good job.
Maybe you should stick to wavelength and frequency. You make more sense with these (none). |
Unguided evolution cannot account for any of what biologists have found- well it can account for disease and deformities.
Transcription and translation alone are definitely evidence for ID. The genetic code is arbitrary and as such it is not reducible to physics or chemistry. Add alternative splicing, overlapping genes, proof-reading, error-correction and intelligent design in biology is as self-evident as the intelligent design of Stonehenge.
Even when given starting populations of prokaryotes you don't have a mechanism that can get beyond that. |
Joey, you keep telling us what we don't have (even though we do) but you never tell us what creationism has. Please be specific. Please link us to the definitive theory. And the overwhelming evidence that supports this theory. And see if you can do this without using words like "asshole, fuck, moron, etc".
You are now up to bat. |
ID is not creationism. Obviously you are too fucked up to have a discussion.
I have provided all you ask for on my blog. It has a search feature. Today's post is a repost of positive evidence for ID. |
A simple lie Joe lying liar.
Here is what the the L.A.W found....
| Quote | | We find that ID fails on three different levels, any one of which is sufficient to preclude a determination that ID is science. They are: (1) ID violates the centuries-old ground rules of science by invoking and permitting supernatural causation; (2) the argument of irreducible complexity, central to ID, employs the same flawed and illogical contrived dualism that doomed creation science in the 1980's; and (3) ID's negative attacks on evolution have been refuted by the scientific community. As we will discuss in more detail below, it is additionally important to note that ID has failed to gain acceptance in the scientific community, it has not generated peer-reviewed publications, nor has it been the subject of testing and research. |
|
What an imbecile. The law didn't find anything. The law choked and listened only to ID's opponents and didn't listen to the ID experts. What kind of a lowlife loser does something like that?
The judge fell for a fucking literature BLUFF. How fucking stupid does someone have to be to do that? |
Not law Joe LAW!!!!!!
You're whining is duely noted, DISMISSED NEXT CASE! |
Your shiteating is duly noted- call Campbells...
--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth
"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton
Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code- Acartia bogart, TARD
YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism
|
