RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (527) < ... 312 313 314 315 316 [317] 318 319 320 321 322 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 5, Return To Teh Dingbat Buffet< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 25 2018,10:06   

Quote
Re, Seversky: “a lot of this reads like complaining because science isn’t coming up with observations and theories that you like . . . “
January 25, 2018 Posted by kairosfocus under agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games, Back to Basics of ID, Darwinist rhetorical tactics, Functionally Specified Complex Information & Organization, Intellectual freedom, Media Manipulation, Agit-Prop &/or Lawfare, Politics/policy and origins issues, Selective Hyperskepticism, warrant, knowledge, science and belief, You're a Nazi/fascist/racist/fundy/creationist etc

What the hell does Warrant have to do with this?



Edited by stevestory on Jan. 25 2018,11:07

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 25 2018,10:10   

On this thread Critical Rationalist is trying to explain to them that General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics are incompatible, and they don't seem to be getting it. These IDiots really are not our best.

Edited by stevestory on Jan. 25 2018,11:11

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 25 2018,10:12   

Maybe another posting of an exploded diagram of the BassMaster 5000 will do it.

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 25 2018,10:17   

Quote
21
SeverskyJanuary 24, 2018 at 8:11 pm
Quote
It is time for ID to provide real leadership in rethinking origins across the board

By all means, go right ahead. Nobody’s stopping you.

I have to say, though, a lot of this reads like complaining because science isn’t coming up with observations and theories that you like or, more specifically, that are consonant with your religious presuppositions.

For example, if we take what astronomy and cosmology have revealed about this Universe, such as its unimaginable size and almost unfathomable time, to argue that it has all been fine-tuned for one animal species out of millions occupying a tiny speck of a planet orbiting an unremarkable star out of billions in one galaxy out of billions looks faintly absurd. Good luck reconciling that with Man as the pinnacle of God’s creation.
heh

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 25 2018,10:19   

Quote
20
daveSJanuary 24, 2018 at 7:49 pm
OldAndrew,
Quote


I don’t believe in demons interfering with our experiments. That’s X-Files stuff, like UFOs and chemicals that spontaneously begin creating complex machines and codes to reproduce and increase their own complexity.

I don’t believe in it either, because I don’t believe demons exist (although I can’t be sure).

However, some do believe they exist, and even claim to have witnessed demonic activity.

Fortunately it seems to occur infrequently to never, so it’s not a serious concern for scientists.


*some* lol

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 25 2018,10:22   

I wonder if HocusPocus is living on the dole. He has a goddam large amount of time to type.

   
Glen Davidson



Posts: 1100
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 25 2018,10:46   

KF's deciphered our code:

Quote
Of course, “natural explanations” is patently a code for naturalistic explanations.


I guess we should have realized that someone would figure that out.

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 25 2018,10:47   

Quote
63
DionisioJanuary 24, 2018 at 7:32 pm
Interesting discussion.

02 KF to SV
06 BA77
13 BA77
24 GP to CR
25 GP to SV
26 BA77
28 BA77
34 BA77
35 ES
37 GP to CR
40 BA77
43 BA77
47 BA77
48 GP to CR
53 BA77
55 BA77
58 ES to CR
59 BA77
61 GP to CR
62 GP to CR


Is dionisio complaining?

   
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 25 2018,10:59   

Quote (stevestory @ Jan. 25 2018,08:22)
I wonder if HocusPocus is living on the dole. He has a goddam large amount of time to type.

But most of it is the same typing, recycled.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Glen Davidson



Posts: 1100
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 25 2018,11:10   

Quote
Accordingly, I think it appropriate to headline my response to Seversky, including the onward accusation of religious bias:


Earlier (as copiously quoted):    
Quote
agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games, Back to Basics of ID, Darwinist rhetorical tactics, Functionally Specified Complex Information & Organization, Intellectual freedom, Media Manipulation, Agit-Prop &/or Lawfare, Politics/policy and origins issues, Selective Hyperskepticism, warrant, knowledge, science and belief, You're a Nazi/fascist/racist/fundy/creationist etc


Would a religiously biased person scream a list of accusations of "agit-prop" (2x, btw) and "Darwinist rhetorical tactics" and further evidence-free accusations in response to someone's claim that the problem is that science isn't supporting them, instead of providing evidence to the contrary?  I mean, really, his righteous anger only indicates his lack of bias.

When accused of religious bias, rant like a religious fanatic!  That'll show them.

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 25 2018,11:34   

Quote (Glen Davidson @ Jan. 25 2018,12:10)
When accused of religious bias, rant like a religious fanatic!  That'll show them.

We're not exactly dealing with the A-Team here. HocusPocus and Barry are even lower-grade than Salvador and Teddy Ruspin Casey Luskin.

   
paragwinn



Posts: 539
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 25 2018,14:39   

Quote (stevestory @ Jan. 25 2018,09:34)
 
Quote (Glen Davidson @ Jan. 25 2018,12:10)
When accused of religious bias, rant like a religious fanatic!  That'll show them.

We're not exactly dealing with the A-Team here. HocusPocus and Barry are even lower-grade than Salvador and Teddy Ruspin Casey Luskin.

Where are the best ID proponents to be found??

--------------
All women build up a resistance [to male condescension]. Apparently, ID did not predict that. -Kristine 4-19-11
F/Ns to F/Ns to F/Ns etc. The whole thing is F/N ridiculous -Seversky on KF footnote fetish 8-20-11
Sigh. Really Bill? - Barry Arrington

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 25 2018,14:49   

Quote (paragwinn @ Jan. 25 2018,14:39)
Quote (stevestory @ Jan. 25 2018,09:34)
 
Quote (Glen Davidson @ Jan. 25 2018,12:10)
When accused of religious bias, rant like a religious fanatic!  That'll show them.

We're not exactly dealing with the A-Team here. HocusPocus and Barry are even lower-grade than Salvador and Teddy Ruspin Casey Luskin.

Where are the best ID proponents to be found??

Thankfully for science, KF, Barry and Joe are the best ID proponents.

  
Texas Teach



Posts: 2084
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 25 2018,15:58   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 25 2018,14:49)
Quote (paragwinn @ Jan. 25 2018,14:39)
Quote (stevestory @ Jan. 25 2018,09:34)
   
Quote (Glen Davidson @ Jan. 25 2018,12:10)
When accused of religious bias, rant like a religious fanatic!  That'll show them.

We're not exactly dealing with the A-Team here. HocusPocus and Barry are even lower-grade than Salvador and Teddy Ruspin Casey Luskin.

Where are the best ID proponents to be found??

Thankfully for science, KF, Barry and Joe are the best ID proponents.

PotW!

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 25 2018,16:26   

So the question is why can't ID find spokespeople that are more intelligent?

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 25 2018,16:38   

Quote (Henry J @ Jan. 25 2018,16:26)
So the question is why can't ID find spokespeople that are more intelligent?

The reason is self-evident. And objectively so.

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 25 2018,20:18   

PaV using inflow and outflow of water in a sink as an analogy to CO2 in the atmosphere:
Quote
IOW, let’s say you were filling up a sink with water, depending on the flow rate out of the sink, and the flow rate into the sink, there would be an equilibrium level of water in the sink. Now, if you increase the flow of water into the sink by 4%, you should expect the level to rise about 4%. If you restricted the flow by 4%, you’d expect the water level to drop by 4%.

UD link
PaV, you will always be one of my favourites!

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
Bob O'H



Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 26 2018,04:13   

Quote (Ptaylor @ Jan. 25 2018,20:18)
PaV using inflow and outflow of water in a sink as an analogy to CO2 in the atmosphere:
 
Quote
IOW, let’s say you were filling up a sink with water, depending on the flow rate out of the sink, and the flow rate into the sink, there would be an equilibrium level of water in the sink. Now, if you increase the flow of water into the sink by 4%, you should expect the level to rise about 4%. If you restricted the flow by 4%, you’d expect the water level to drop by 4%.

UD link
PaV, you will always be one of my favourites!

That whole discussion is hilarious. PaV on the OP:
Quote


I wonder what you make of this “Keeling Curve.” I especially wonder what you make of the inset–which can be seen to oscillate on the actual graph of this ‘curve’ below the inset.

This might be a very teachable moment.

PaV @ 12-:
Quote
There is NO teachable moment. This is because the Keeling Curve was falsely advertised as representing continuous recordings of CO2 from Mauna Loa and from Antartica.


--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 26 2018,10:12   

Quote (Henry J @ Jan. 26 2018,00:26)
So the question is why can't ID find spokespeople that are more intelligent?

Their god doesn't want them to succeed. Would you? He's  trolled all their blogs and has given up in disgust. After all they are not true believers mearly fellow travelers in self loathing.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 26 2018,11:11   

jdk to Mullings:
Quote
Your persistent claim that the standards endorsed materialism, scientism and/or atheism is wrong. In fact, I would call your continuing to make such a claim a lie, as the quotes above prove that such a claim is wrong.


And then subsequently:
Quote
I think I have provided enough evidence for the unbiased observer to see that I am correct about what the Ks science standards said. One may disagree with them – that it a different matter, but to claim that they endorse atheism is a lie.

‘Nuf said.


Has jdk surpassed his best before date?

  
Wesley R. Elsberry



Posts: 4991
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 26 2018,11:12   

Quote (Bob O'H @ Jan. 26 2018,04:13)
Quote (Ptaylor @ Jan. 25 2018,20:18)
PaV using inflow and outflow of water in a sink as an analogy to CO2 in the atmosphere:
 
Quote
IOW, let’s say you were filling up a sink with water, depending on the flow rate out of the sink, and the flow rate into the sink, there would be an equilibrium level of water in the sink. Now, if you increase the flow of water into the sink by 4%, you should expect the level to rise about 4%. If you restricted the flow by 4%, you’d expect the water level to drop by 4%.

UD link
PaV, you will always be one of my favourites!

That whole discussion is hilarious. PaV on the OP:
Quote


I wonder what you make of this “Keeling Curve.” I especially wonder what you make of the inset–which can be seen to oscillate on the actual graph of this ‘curve’ below the inset.

This might be a very teachable moment.

PaV @ 12-:
Quote
There is NO teachable moment. This is because the Keeling Curve was falsely advertised as representing continuous recordings of CO2 from Mauna Loa and from Antartica.

PaV's Paradox is kinda like Zeno's Paradox, but instead of the arrow never reaching its target, for PaV the sink never ever overflows.

--------------
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

    
Jkrebs



Posts: 590
Joined: Sep. 2004

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 26 2018,13:21   

I think the comment is still there.

here

So is this one, for the time being at least (posted after I wrote "As I recall, Lewontin did not help write the Kansas Science Standards")

   
Quote
kf, more seriously your extremely inflammatory, hyperbolic rhetoric fails to separate metaphysical beliefs held by people not associated with the Kansas science standards with actual statements written by the authors of those standards, the majority of which, I know, did not hold those same metaphysical beliefs.

Therefore, you are calling those authors deceptive liars.

A few sample statements from above:

   
Quote

As it is practiced in the late 20th and early 21st century, science is restricted to explaining only the natural world, using only natural cause. This is because science currently has no tools to test explanations using non-natural (such as supernatural) causes.

It is important to note that science cannot answer all questions. Some questions are simply beyond the parameters of science...

[The student]understands there are many issues which involve morals, ethics, values or spiritual beliefs that go beyond what science can explain, but for which solid scientific literacy is useful.


These are honest, clear statements from the authors of the standards.

Your refusal to accept their word - to effectively say you think they are lying about their true beliefs - is unconscionable, and displays how you are at the mercy of your ideological blinders to the detriment of other commendable human qualities that I would hope people would have.

You can legitimately disagree about how you think science ought to be defined, and you can legitimately disagree about the truth of metaphysical naturalism (materialism, scientism, atheism, etc.), but you can not legitimately maintain that the Kansas Science standards definition of science was met to proclaim or endorse metaphysical naturalism, because the authors of those standards clearly stated that many important issues lie outside of science's scope.

I absolutely know you won't change one iota of your perspective, and if this subject ever comes up again, you will repeat the same lies.

One of my many favorite Dylan lines, from "Trouble in Mind": the inevitable price of an extreme commitment to a dogmatic ideology.

   
Quote
The truth is far from you, so you know you got to lie
Then you're all the time defending what you can never justify


Edited by stevestory on Jan. 26 2018,14:28

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 26 2018,13:22   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 25 2018,17:38)
Quote (Henry J @ Jan. 25 2018,16:26)
So the question is why can't ID find spokespeople that are more intelligent?

The reason is self-evident. And objectively so.

Lately I'm encountering honest-to-god Flat Earthers. I was standing outside a Panera Bread in Lake City, fl, and took a photo of a car with a sign "RESEARCH FLAT EARTH". It's on my FB page but you can't make it out on account 'a how sly I was tryin to be. I went inside and 2 twentysomethings come up to me and said "Dude! We thought we were going to be the only ones to take a picture of that shit!!!"

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 26 2018,13:31   

two guys named Charlie and Trey. We actually bonded since this a Tard Town where Donald Trump won by like 185%.

Edited by stevestory on Jan. 26 2018,14:31

   
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 26 2018,13:32   

The Flat Earth Society has members around the globe!



Edited by stevestory on Jan. 26 2018,14:44

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 26 2018,15:43   

When those members want to meet each other, how do they travel?  :p

  
Lethean



Posts: 292
Joined: Jan. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 26 2018,22:04   

Quote (stevestory @ Jan. 25 2018,10:06)
Quote
Re, Seversky: “a lot of this reads like complaining because science isn’t coming up with observations and theories that you like . . . “
January 25, 2018 Posted by kairosfocus under agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games, Back to Basics of ID, Darwinist rhetorical tactics, Functionally Specified Complex Information & Organization, Intellectual freedom, Media Manipulation, Agit-Prop &/or Lawfare, Politics/policy and origins issues, Selective Hyperskepticism, warrant, knowledge, science and belief, You're a Nazi/fascist/racist/fundy/creationist etc

What the hell does Warrant have to do with this?



BRB, calculating the CSI of my sweet cherry pie.

--------------
"So I'm a pretty unusual guy and it's not stupidity that has gotten me where I am. It's brilliance."

"My brain is one of the very few independent thinking brains that you've ever met. And that's a thing of wonder to you and since you don't understand it you criticize it."


~Dave Hawkins~

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 27 2018,00:52   

PaV’s Climatistas post doesn’t look to be working out the way he might have liked. After having his household sink analogy ridiculed he’s moved on to ocean acidification and CO2 levels shown by Antarctic ice cores, producing a graph that shows that CO2 buildup has been going on for a long, long time…

 
Quote
34
PaV
   January 26, 2018 at 6:34 pm

muller’s ratchet:
Did you look at the graph? Please explain the exponential rise of CO2 levels in the Antartica ice cores starting in the 1800’s. Was the ocean “gaining” CO2 then? And, if it was, then WHERE did all the extra CO2 come from?
If you can’t answer that question, then realize you stopped thinking a long time ago.


 
Quote
35
mullers_ratchet
  January 26, 2018 at 6:53 pm

You may have heard of the industrial revolution…

…since the industrial revolution!

Edited by Ptaylor on Jan. 27 2018,18:35

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
sparc



Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 27 2018,07:26   

Things allways get even better when KF chimes in
     
Quote
40 mullers_ratchetJanuary 27, 2018 at 1:51 am

I would usually indulge a gish-galloper, but this made me laugh…      
Quote


   Graph of Climate Change…

   Last Thousand Years European Climatic Changes


Do you know what data was used to reconstruct that temperature? Or where the graph comes from?

     
Quote
41 kairosfocusJanuary 27, 2018 at 3:32 am

MR,

I formally draw your attention to a corrective regarding a term of abuse and slander you have resorted to yet again:

https:/ /uncommondescent.com/darwinism/notice-on-the-gish-gallop-false-accusation-tactic-and-fallacious-dodge/

I suggest that in future you refrain yourself from such a trollish reference.

KF


Quote
42
mullers_ratchetJanuary 27, 2018 at 5:09 am

what a cast of characters this place has! “Formally”? you’re “formally” telling me you don’t like a turn of phrase?

Let me hereby formally inform you that I consider the phrase “gish gallop” accurately describes DATCG’s diversionary tactics. For this reason, I must further inform you that I will continue to use this phrase as and when I consider it to fairly and reasonably describe the actions of a commenter on this website.

     
Quote
43
kairosfocusJanuary 27, 2018 at 5:35 am

MR,

you have obviously failed to read the linked corrective, and seem to imagine that gratuitously slandering someone now unable to defend himself, is a responsible pattern of behaviour.

Duly noted.

Ilk duly recognised.

KF


--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 27 2018,12:15   

Again:

Seriously, who talks like that?

Someone should visit Monserrat to find out if HocusPocus is such a pompous windbag in person, or if it's just when he has time (LOTS of time, apparently) to write it.

I wonder what the first drafts in his wastepaper basket look like.

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
  15792 replies since Dec. 29 2013,11:01 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (527) < ... 312 313 314 315 316 [317] 318 319 320 321 322 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]