RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (527) < ... 91 92 93 94 95 [96] 97 98 99 100 101 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 5, Return To Teh Dingbat Buffet< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Glen Davidson



Posts: 1100
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 12 2015,17:03   

Quote (dheddle @ Mar. 12 2015,16:58)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 12 2015,16:52)
Quote (dheddle @ Mar. 12 2015,16:32)
 
Quote (OgreMkV @ Mar. 09 2015,09:07)
 
Quote (Patrick @ Mar. 09 2015,09:03)
Anti-Science Advocates Are Freaking Out About New Google Truth Rankings

Will this be the demise of Uncommon Descent?

Nah. Their traffic is mostly us.

Hah!

Hi Dave! You never call, write... your blog wont even let me view it!

I stopped blogging. I went outside. I interacted more with my bride. I talked more with my kids. I gave more time to my students.

As to whether that was an improvement...

That sounds highly irresponsible, considering that it's still the case that someone is wrong on the internet.

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 12 2015,17:21   

Quote (Glen Davidson @ Mar. 12 2015,17:03)
Quote (dheddle @ Mar. 12 2015,16:58)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 12 2015,16:52)
 
Quote (dheddle @ Mar. 12 2015,16:32)
 
Quote (OgreMkV @ Mar. 09 2015,09:07)
   
Quote (Patrick @ Mar. 09 2015,09:03)
Anti-Science Advocates Are Freaking Out About New Google Truth Rankings

Will this be the demise of Uncommon Descent?

Nah. Their traffic is mostly us.

Hah!

Hi Dave! You never call, write... your blog wont even let me view it!

I stopped blogging. I went outside. I interacted more with my bride. I talked more with my kids. I gave more time to my students.

As to whether that was an improvement...

That sounds highly irresponsible, considering that it's still the case that someone is wrong on the internet.

Glen Davidson

+1.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 12 2015,17:29   

BA77 draws out Pearcey on the illusion of self as an implication of Evolutionary Materialism

something tells me that headline is writing a check that is gonna bounce.

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 12 2015,17:34   

Quote

16
CHartsilMarch 12, 2015 at 9:01 am

The problem is it’s not evidence so it has to be thrown together in Gish gallop form.

WARNING: This is a double personal accusation of dishonesty. It accuses Mr Gish and in this case both BA77 and myself. Withdraw it or leave this thread. KF


Quote

17
kairosfocusMarch 12, 2015 at 9:10 am
CHartsil, you have made actually a three way false accusation of dishonesty as just warned. Withdraw it or leave this thread, forthwith. GEM of TKI


Quote

24
CHartsilMarch 12, 2015 at 9:39 am

“You seem to simply regurgitate tired old refuted arguments.”

>From the side that still thinks IC is a valid argument.

“Not unexpected though considering the codswallop you zealots believe in.”

That projection though


Quote

25
kairosfocusMarch 12, 2015 at 10:00 am
CHartsil, you have refused to withdraw an unwarranted and false accusation of dishonesty that abuses the memory of a decent man who square and fair won hundreds of debates on the state of the fossil evidence; after you have been warned . . . and after you have similarly acted in a previous thread; please leave this thread forthwith. This is uncivil conduct and will not be tolerated. There will be no further warnings. KF


and so on, and so forth...

   
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 12 2015,19:18   

Good thing KF doesn't have the banhammer.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 12 2015,19:21   

Has anyone ever seen KF and Gish together?

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2015,19:33   

Would anybody want to? And why?

  
Patrick



Posts: 666
Joined: July 2011

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 14 2015,14:36   

Quote (Henry J @ Mar. 13 2015,20:33)
Would anybody want to? And why?

Two birds, one stone?

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 15 2015,01:10   

RD Miska drips one of the greatest tard-turds of all time and then declares this is his last post on the subject. Epic, golden age tard:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-553947

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 15 2015,01:35   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 14 2015,23:10)
RD Miska drips one of the greatest tard-turds of all time and then declares this is his last post on the subject. Epic, golden age tard:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-553947

You read all that?  I'm not sure whether I'm impressed or worried for you.

I got as far as:
Quote
Finally, please note that my response is very long (over five thousand words), so only read it if you are truly interested in this subject (but also note that it is only a partial response, as the full response is over 20,000 words at this point).

and said "fuck it".

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
sparc



Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 15 2015,11:43   

Piotr at UD
Quote
This is just a blog where everyone can participate in the discussion, whetever (if any) their qualifications are.
Good luck with that on a thread run by KF.

--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
Tony M Nyphot



Posts: 491
Joined: June 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 15 2015,12:15   

In a back-and-forth about violent deaths and who is most responsible, De-News interjects:

     
Quote
15
NewsMarch 15, 2015 at 9:56 am
Zachriel at 1: There may not be a decline in violent deaths so much as a decline in reporting. If the deaths of no-longer-wanted women, unborn children, identified gays, enemies of the people are not counted – well, how DOES one do the stats anyway?


Perhaps she should visit Christian Life Resources where she will find that 72.5% of women receiving abortions report a religious affiliation. Only 27.5% report no religious affiliation and I would bet a few of those are too guilty to admit they do have an affiliation.

--------------
"I, OTOH, am an underachiever...I either pee my pants or faint dead away..." FTK

"You could always wrap fresh fish in the paper you publish it on, though, and sell that." - Field Man on how to find value in Gary Gaulin's real-science "theory"

  
Kantian Naturalist



Posts: 72
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 15 2015,13:05   

I would like to enter into the record the following indication of Arrington's intellectual mendacity.  

At the beginning of the thread on "Belief?", Arrington writes

Quote
Of course not Mark, if by “evolution” you mean materialist Neo-Darwinian evolution. This is the case for the simple reason that if materialism is true, “beliefs” as they are commonly understood do not exist. They are an illusion, mere “folk psychology” according to Dennett.


KeithS, Mark Frank, and Reciprocating Bill all both quickly point -- correctly -- that Dennett is not an eliminativist about beliefs.  (He is an eliminativist about qualia, though his eliminativism about qualia is based on semantic considerations, whereas Churchland's eliminativism about belief-desire psychology is based on epistemological considerations.)  

To this correction Arrington responds with -- you guessed it! -- NOTHING.  He does not deign to notice that he got Dennett wrong, and he does not thank any critics for the correction.  You can expect that he'll repeat the same basic error in a few months or years.  

While Arrington and others insist that we take the time to read Dembski, Behe, Denton, etc. before engaging them in spirited on-line discussions, they do not show "us naturalists" the same courtesy.

This is also comes up in the subsequent discussion on Plantinga's EAAN, where the defenders of Plantinga are blissfully ignorant of all the criticisms of the EAAN that have piled up over the years -- including an entire book (Naturalism Defeated?) devoted to it.  It's not that they don't know that there are criticisms of Plantinga; it's that they don't want to know that there are criticisms of Plantinga.  And that is a text-book illustration of intellectual dishonesty.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 15 2015,13:41   

Barry is an eager and frequent poster when he thinks he has a drum to bang, but goes missing very quickly when it all goes south.


That must be an objective morality thing.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Glen Davidson



Posts: 1100
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 15 2015,14:17   

Niwrad explains:

Quote
Good. I like exploded views


Proving that quote-mining can get to the truth...

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
Glen Davidson



Posts: 1100
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 15 2015,14:37   

As far as retreading Descartes' "how can we know things" in Meditations over there yet again, I haven't a clue why those bozos can't get through their heads that the problem is getting from St. Augustine's "if I doubt then I at least know that I am doubting" (Descartes' cogito ergo sum) to "I know that I see some wax there."  

There seem to be problems with cogito ergo sum, but let that go for now.  How do they know it's not Descartes' demon that's feeding them a pack of lies?  Unless one actually thinks that Descartes' sensed infinity really and truly (yup, quite believable Rene) and that "clear and distinct" sensing means a damned thing (as scholastics supposed, and that modern philosophy thinks is an easy way to believing lies), you just don't get around that problem.

Theist Kant took up the problem and noticed, unlike Plantinga's tripe, that there's really no way through to knowing for sure that Berkeley's or some other idealist system isn't the case.  And of course Berkeley, Royce, et al., never get around to the problem of elaborate fakery by demons, or what-not.  Kant just goes pragmatic, noting that it hardly matters if the "real world" is "really as it appears to us," we can deal with it anyway, via perception and reason.

Evolution doesn't save us from the problem that this could all be a dream, or whatever, yet in a practical sense it does suggest that we're going to evolve a reasonable approximation using our senses and brain processing of sensory data.  It gives us reason to think that the apparent 3-D world probably results from our evolution of the ability to navigate a "really existing" 3-D world.  Theism really doesn't get anywhere nearly so close to giving us a reason to suppose that the world is fairly like what we sense it to be.

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 15 2015,14:44   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 15 2015,11:41)
Barry is an eager and frequent poster when he thinks he has a drum to bang, but goes missing very quickly when it all goes south.


"Wearing baseball caps but they won't be backward."

Alabama

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 15 2015,15:59   

Quote (fnxtr @ Mar. 15 2015,14:44)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 15 2015,11:41)
Barry is an eager and frequent poster when he thinks he has a drum to bang, but goes missing very quickly when it all goes south.


"Wearing baseball caps but they won't be backward."

Alabama

Or he simply makes his opponents go silent.

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 15 2015,16:13   

Gordon (KairosFocus) Mullings is presiding over an entertaining rehash of why a naturalist origin of life violates the second law of thermodynamics. What that man doesn't know about thermodynamics could fill several large text books.

  
REC



Posts: 638
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 15 2015,16:35   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 15 2015,01:10)
RD Miska drips one of the greatest tard-turds of all time and then declares this is his last post on the subject. Epic, golden age tard:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-553947

You should have kept going, at least to the "What the hell am I even reading" point. I went too far, and now worry RD Mikasa has some issues to work out.....

Quote
Next, note that concerning reproduction, Grog in no way believes that engaging in what we would call sexual intercourse is the way to reproduce. Rather, Grog falsely believes that if he, say, licks and wrestles with his partner that that is the way that reproduction happens, and so Grog engages in these behaviors daily.


Quote
However, at the same time, Grog also believes, again falsely, that as an adult, the way that adults nourish themselves is to engage in what we would call sexual intercourse with their partner, and he believes that the “nourishment” is ingested through the sexual organs. As such, and in order to stay full, Grog thus engages in sexual intercourse at least three times a day, thereby falsely believing that, through an exchange of fluids, he is feeding his partner and she is feeding him.


Quote
let us say that Grog is the ugliest and weakest male member of his tribe. As such, Grog would normally not even be given a female in marriage,


aww :(

Quote
. Thus, thinking himself so strong and good-looking, Grog is substantially more arrogant and forward than he has a right to be. He actively pursues females. His perseverance is then seen as a desirable trait and Grog is thus given a female partner of a much higher quality than he ever would have received had he not persisted in his false and delusional belief about his strength and attractiveness.


Grog showed them....and got that hot female.....!given?.....to him.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 15 2015,18:21   

One wonders how Grog transitioned from 'child' to 'adult' nutrition. UD has become a joke.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 15 2015,19:16   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 16 2015,11:21)
One wonders how Grog transitioned from 'child' to 'adult' nutrition. UD has becomeremains a joke.

FTFY

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
KevinB



Posts: 525
Joined: April 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 16 2015,09:13   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 15 2015,16:13)
Gordon (KairosFocus) Mullings is presiding over an entertaining rehash of why a naturalist origin of life violates the second law of thermodynamics. What that man doesn't know about thermodynamics could fill several large text books.

Is "several large text books" more than 150 bits? If so, can we use Dembski's argument to show that this amount of lack of information could not have arisen merely by chance, and that KF, therefore, is wilfully ignorant?

  
Kantian Naturalist



Posts: 72
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 16 2015,11:21   

Quote (Glen Davidson @ Mar. 15 2015,14:37)
Evolution doesn't save us from the problem that this could all be a dream, or whatever, yet in a practical sense it does suggest that we're going to evolve a reasonable approximation using our senses and brain processing of sensory data.  It gives us reason to think that the apparent 3-D world probably results from our evolution of the ability to navigate a "really existing" 3-D world.  Theism really doesn't get anywhere nearly so close to giving us a reason to suppose that the world is fairly like what we sense it to be.


Actually, I think that evolutionary considerations can be marshaled effectively as part of a pragmatic realism, with nods to Dewey and to both Roy Wood and Wilfrid Sellars, to show that our practical involvement with affordances is best explained in terms of the cooperation of the objects that are there anyway ("noumena") and our perceptual and conceptual capacities that are themselves structurally coupled with objects as a result of (among other things) past natural selection.  

Though we do perceive "phenomena," we can indeed know "noumena" (more precisely, the history of scientific knowledge is best explained in terms of asymptotic convergence on the noumena, not a direct "intuitive" grasping of them all at once). And understanding how we are able to both perceive phenomena and know noumena involves understanding the neurodynamic basis, and evolutionary history, of our perceptual and conceptual capacities.  

Of course none of this means anything to the anti-naturalists who freely spin wild fantasies about what a naturalist "must" believe, without bothering themselves to learn any of the relevant science or philosophy.

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 16 2015,12:09   

Physicists since Galileo have been speculating that existence is made of math. Whatever that means. The latest invocation of this meme is that the universe is equivalent to a hologram, a two dimensional surface.

I don't feel any compulsion to know what reality "really" is. I move along trying to maximize pleasantness and minimize unpleasantness. Perhaps I'm just one's and zeroes in a matrix, but when I kick the stone, it hurts.

I was reminded of this a couple weeks ago, when I broke my toe in the dark.

Anyway, Douglas Adams had a take on this. "Man" is the Ruler of the Universe:

Quote
MAN:   Pussy pussy pussy . . . coochicoochicoochi . . . pussy want his fish? Nice piece of fish . . . pussy want it? Pussy not eat his fish, pussy get thin and waste away, I think. I imagine this is what will happen, but how can I tell? I think it's better if I don't get involved. I think fish is nice, but then I think that rain is wet so who am I to judge? Ah, you're eating it.

I like it when I see you eat the fish, because in my mind you will waste away if you don't.

Fish come from far away, or so I'm told. Or so I imagine I'm told. When the men come, or when in my mind the men come in their six black shiny ships do they come in your mind too? What do you see, pussy? And when I hear their questions, all their many questions do you hear questions? Perhaps you just think they're singing songs to you. Perhaps they are singing songs to you and I just think they're asking me questions. Do you think they came today? I do. There's mud on the floor, cigarettes and whisky on my table, fish in your plate and a memory of them in my mind. And look what else they've left me. Crosswords, dictionaries and a calculator. I think I must be right in thinking they ask me questions. To come all that way and leave all these things just for the privilege of singing songs to you would be very strange behaviour. Or so it seems to me. Who can tell, who can tell.

. . . .

MAN:   I think I saw another ship in the sky today. A big white one. I've never seen a big white one. Only six small black ones. Perhaps six small black ones can look like one big white one. Perhaps I would like a glass of whisky. Yes, that seems more likely.

. . . .

Perhaps some different people are coming to see me.

. . . .

MAN:     Hello?

FORD PREFECT:    Er, excuse me, do you rule the Universe?

MAN:     I try not to. Are you wet?

FORD:    Wet! Well, doesn't it look as if we're wet?

MAN:    That's how it looks to me, but how you feel about it might be a different matter. If you find warmth makes you feel dry you'd better come in.

. . . .

ZAPHOD BEEBLEBROX:  Er, man, like what's your name?

MAN:       I don't know. Why, do you think I ought to have one? It seems odd to give a bundle of vague sensory perceptions a name.

ZARNIWOOP:  Listen. We must ask you some questions.

MAN:    All right. You can sing to my cat if you like.

ARTHUR DENT:  Would he like that?

MAN:   You'd better ask him that.

ZARNIWOOP:  How long have you been ruling the Universe?

MAN:   Ah, this is a question about the past is it?

ZARNIWOOP:  Yes.

MAN:    How can I tell that the past isn't a fiction designed to account for the discrepancy between my immediate physical sensations and my state of mind?

ZARNIWOOP:  Do you answer all questions like this?

MAN:    I say what it occurs to me to say when I think I hear people say things. More I cannot say.

. . . .

ZARNIWOOP:     No. Listen. People come to you, yes?

MAN:  I think so.

ZARNIWOOP:    And they ask you to take decisions—about wars, about economies, about people, about everything going on out there in the Universe?

MAN:    I only decide about my Universe. My Universe is what happens to my eyes and ears. Anything else is surmise and hearsay. For all I know, these people may not exist. You may not exist. I say what it occurs to me to say.

ZARNIWOOP:  But don't you see? What you decide affects the fate of millions of people.

MAN:    I don't know them, I've never met them. They only exist in words I think I hear. The men who come say to me, say, so and so wants to declare what we call a war. These are the facts, what do you think? And I say. Sometimes it's a smaller thing. . . .

. . . .

MAN:    But it's folly to say you know what is happening to other people. Only they know. If they exist.

ZARNIWOOP:  Do you think they do?

MAN:    I have no opinion. How can I have?

ZARNIWOOP:  I have.

MAN:   So you say—or so I hear you say.

. . . .

ZARNIWOOP:  But don't you see that people live or die on your word?

MAN:    It's nothing to do with me, I am not involved with people. The Lord knows I am not a cruel man.

ZARNIWOOP:    Ah! You say . . . the Lord! You believe in . . .

MAN:    My cat. I call him the Lord. I am kind to him.

ZARNIWOOP:  All right. How do you know he exists? How do you know he knows you to be kind, or enjoys what you think of as your kindness?

MAN:    I don't. I have no idea. It merely pleases me to behave in a certain way to what appears to be a cat. What else do you do? Please I am tired.


Edited by midwifetoad on Mar. 16 2015,12:11

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 16 2015,19:04   

LAM vs VJT

   
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 16 2015,19:45   

Quote (stevestory @ Mar. 16 2015,17:04)
LAM vs VJT

From the comments.  POTW, offsite division:
Quote
Jonathan Badger Monday, March 16, 2015 5:04:00 PM

I think it is important to remember we are talking about a town called Cupertino. People just don't seem to be objective in regard to news from towns named that. Even today, when the news from another Cupertino is of a computer or phone with relatively unimpressive stats, people seem to think a miracle has occurred and get up early to go to a local shrine of Apple to wait in line to behold the relics.


--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
socle



Posts: 322
Joined: July 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 16 2015,22:20   

Collin:
 
Quote
The Sun has had an abundance of high order energy for billions of years. Why no life on the Sun?

  
sparc



Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 16 2015,23:50   

KF seems a little bit bitter:
Quote

126
kairosfocusMarch 16, 2015 at 9:35 pm

KS, I have taken time I should not have spared, to address a raft of seriouis misconceptions and strawman objections you and other objectors have raised again and again, resisting and dismissing correction. Do you think that I am now in a mood to go after a red herring chase that leads predictably to more strawman caricatures soaked in ad hominems to be set alight to further poison, cloud and polarise the atmosphere? Do you think that I was born yesterday and do not understand that already you have been hinting at personal attacks, in the teeth of reasonable responses already given on the material question, the 500 – 1,000 bit threshold? As of now, you come across as an indoctrinated ideologue who is not serious about substantial matters, only intent on the rhetoric of polarisation and distraction. I challenge you to show to us some semblance of a sign that you have seriously and with fairness and understanding interacted with our concerns and understand why I in particular have pointed to statistical underpinnings of 2LOT and then have raised the issue of statistical miracles; saying that prof Sewell has a serious point. KF


--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 16 2015,23:50   

KF getting hammered on 2LoT. He keeps harping on about FIASCO - can someone point out that outside if UD / him no one cares about / acknowledges his concept ?

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
  15792 replies since Dec. 29 2013,11:01 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (527) < ... 91 92 93 94 95 [96] 97 98 99 100 101 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]