Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > MrIntelligentDesign

Pages: (42) < ... 32 33 34 35 36 [37] 38 39 40 41 42 ... >

ChemiCat Posts: 532 Joined: Nov. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 27 2015,04:15    Quote Holy crap if this goes on he'll reprint his whole useless miserable books and then you'll have read them. Don't encourage him. But, but, I REALLY want an Aston Martin!

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 27 2015,06:41    Amusing. The man who brags about people fleeing from his ideas, notable scientists being unwilling or 'afraid' to debate him runs away from challenges. The man who claims to have 'new discoveries' and 'science' has still failed to learn that there are countless ways to show bad ideas to be incorrect besides presenting the 'right' idea. Edgar, you're a total loser. Incapable of defending your notions. Incapable of mature responses. Incapable of honesty and integrity. Completely confused, to the point where you believe confusion is insight. Total loser.

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 27 2015,06:58    Quote (ChemiCat @ Oct. 27 2015,12:15) Quote Holy crap if this goes on he'll reprint his whole useless miserable books and then you'll have read them. Don't encourage him. But, but, I REALLY want an Aston Martin! -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 27 2015,07:00    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 27 2015,11:43)   Quote (Glen Davidson @ Oct. 26 2015,23:50) Galileo, patron saint of cranks and pseudoscientists. Not his fault, but unfortunately the occasional Wegener (whose theory wasn't really correct enough yet for science, but didn't deserve the disparagement it got either) or Galileo ends up giving a whole lot of hope to people who have no appreciation for the fact that they used genuine facts and data to back up their claims. Galileo is a good figure for them to bring up, actually, only they're his anti-science opponents. Glen Davidson Bring your another version of the universal intelligence and let us fight intellectually OR SHUT UP and support me.. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

EmperorZelos Posts: 81 Joined: Oct. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 27 2015,07:03    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 27 2015,03:44) Quote (Glen Davidson @ Oct. 26 2015,21:37) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 26 2015,21:21)   Quote (jeffox @ Oct. 26 2015,13:03) 1 is the loneliest number that you'll ever do . . . . (He won't get it) :)  :)  :) LOL!!! Galileo was alone when he said that the earth revolves around the sun...it doesn't mean that he was wrong.. My discoveries will be the same... You're as good at history as you are at science. But yeah, you're discoveries will the same as your understanding of Galileo, counterfactual, dumb, and disconnected from reality. Glen Davidson ps--Are you really unaware of Copernicus? YOU HAVE NO SCIENCE and that it is! You have religion only... You got no science either because that requires peer-review!

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 27 2015,07:24    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 27 2015,04:43) Quote (Glen Davidson @ Oct. 26 2015,23:50) Galileo, patron saint of cranks and pseudoscientists. Not his fault, but unfortunately the occasional Wegener (whose theory wasn't really correct enough yet for science, but didn't deserve the disparagement it got either) or Galileo ends up giving a whole lot of hope to people who have no appreciation for the fact that they used genuine facts and data to back up their claims. Galileo is a good figure for them to bring up, actually, only they're his anti-science opponents. Glen Davidson Bring your another version of the universal intelligence and let us fight intellectually OR SHUT UP and support me.. Not how it works, cupcake. We've already explained that, repeatedly. You obviously have no intelligence because you fail to learn this simple fact. We've shown that your ideas are false, incoherent, illogical, and completely without merit. With evidence and logical proof. The intellectual battle has already been held.  Your notions were dead before they entered the ring. "Support you"?  There's nothing there to support.

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 27 2015,07:27    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 27 2015,04:44) Quote (Glen Davidson @ Oct. 26 2015,21:37) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 26 2015,21:21)   Quote (jeffox @ Oct. 26 2015,13:03) 1 is the loneliest number that you'll ever do . . . . (He won't get it) :)  :)  :) LOL!!! Galileo was alone when he said that the earth revolves around the sun...it doesn't mean that he was wrong.. My discoveries will be the same... You're as good at history as you are at science. But yeah, you're discoveries will the same as your understanding of Galileo, counterfactual, dumb, and disconnected from reality. Glen Davidson ps--Are you really unaware of Copernicus? YOU HAVE NO SCIENCE and that it is! You have religion only... Redefining terms to suit your own prejudices is dishonest. But then you're the idiot who thinks categorization is explanation. Who thinks definition is explanation. Who thinks one cannot use a thing without knowing the definition for it. You are the man who doesn't understand intelligence because he has never experienced it. Meanwhile, in the real world, you have no science, you are not part of science, you have nothing to offer to science. And everyone other than you knows it.

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 28 2015,03:35    Quote (NoName @ Oct. 27 2015,07:27) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 27 2015,04:44) Quote (Glen Davidson @ Oct. 26 2015,21:37)   Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 26 2015,21:21)     Quote (jeffox @ Oct. 26 2015,13:03) 1 is the loneliest number that you'll ever do . . . . (He won't get it) :)  :)  :) LOL!!! Galileo was alone when he said that the earth revolves around the sun...it doesn't mean that he was wrong.. My discoveries will be the same... You're as good at history as you are at science. But yeah, you're discoveries will the same as your understanding of Galileo, counterfactual, dumb, and disconnected from reality. Glen Davidson ps--Are you really unaware of Copernicus? YOU HAVE NO SCIENCE and that it is! You have religion only... Redefining terms to suit your own prejudices is dishonest. But then you're the idiot who thinks categorization is explanation. Who thinks definition is explanation. Who thinks one cannot use a thing without knowing the definition for it. You are the man who doesn't understand intelligence because he has never experienced it. Meanwhile, in the real world, you have no science, you are not part of science, you have nothing to offer to science. And everyone other than you knows it. That is we do science. We redefine and categorize many X so that we could understand the whole natural realm.. YOU HAVE NOTHING! Really, you have only religion!

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 28 2015,03:35    Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 27 2015,07:03) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 27 2015,03:44) Quote (Glen Davidson @ Oct. 26 2015,21:37)   Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 26 2015,21:21)     Quote (jeffox @ Oct. 26 2015,13:03) 1 is the loneliest number that you'll ever do . . . . (He won't get it) :)  :)  :) LOL!!! Galileo was alone when he said that the earth revolves around the sun...it doesn't mean that he was wrong.. My discoveries will be the same... You're as good at history as you are at science. But yeah, you're discoveries will the same as your understanding of Galileo, counterfactual, dumb, and disconnected from reality. Glen Davidson ps--Are you really unaware of Copernicus? YOU HAVE NO SCIENCE and that it is! You have religion only... You got no science either because that requires peer-review! Tell your peer-reviewers to learn science from me...

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 28 2015,06:42    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 28 2015,04:35) Quote (NoName @ Oct. 27 2015,07:27) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 27 2015,04:44)  ... YOU HAVE NO SCIENCE and that it is! You have religion only... Redefining terms to suit your own prejudices is dishonest. But then you're the idiot who thinks categorization is explanation. Who thinks definition is explanation. Who thinks one cannot use a thing without knowing the definition for it. You are the man who doesn't understand intelligence because he has never experienced it. Meanwhile, in the real world, you have no science, you are not part of science, you have nothing to offer to science. And everyone other than you knows it. That is we do science. We redefine and categorize many X so that we could understand the whole natural realm.. YOU HAVE NOTHING! Really, you have only religion! Who is this 'we' of whom you speak? You are no part of science.  You are ignored by the profession, properly so.  You have contributed nothing to the fields of science. You understand nothing of 'the natural realm'. And we are the ones who have science. So to repeat, redefining terms, such as 'religion'  and 'science' to suit your own self-aggrandizing needs and prejudices, is dishonest. It is also failing you, as you are convincing no one. You have no science.  None whatsoever. And instead of providing evidence to substantiate your claims (which is how science is done, as you clearly do not know), you shriek and howl and demand that people 'shut up shut up'. Not impressive, Edgar. In fact, you lose.  You act like a loser because you are a loser.

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 28 2015,06:44    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 28 2015,04:35) ... Tell your peer-reviewers to learn science from me... Why? You have nothing to teach them.  Quite literally nothing at all. Your sole ground for rejecting peer review is that you did not get the results you wanted.  Buck up and do the work. Your current mess more nearly resembles a used diaper than science. Your categorization scheme produces false negatives and false positives.  Thus, it fails. It is merely a categorization scheme, and, as such, has zero explanatory power. You have nothing.  Do you get me?

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 30 2015,05:21    Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 27 2015,07:03) [quote=MrIntelligentDesign,Oct. 27 2015,03:44] [quote=Glen Davidson,Oct. 26 2015,21:37]   Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 26 2015,21:21)   You have religion only... You got no science either because that requires peer-review! LOL!!! Bring me your best reviewers and we will fight intellectually in science... or SHUT UP!

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 30 2015,05:23    Quote (NoName @ Oct. 28 2015,06:44) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 28 2015,04:35) ... Tell your peer-reviewers to learn science from me... Why? You have nothing to teach them.  Quite literally nothing at all. Your sole ground for rejecting peer review is that you did not get the results you wanted.  Buck up and do the work. Your current mess more nearly resembles a used diaper than science. Your categorization scheme produces false negatives and false positives.  Thus, it fails. It is merely a categorization scheme, and, as such, has zero explanatory power. You have nothing.  Do you get me? I will teach them real science...the science that cannot be defeated and cannot bring you down.. Your science is a joke!

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 30 2015,05:46    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 30 2015,06:23) Quote (NoName @ Oct. 28 2015,06:44) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 28 2015,04:35) ... Tell your peer-reviewers to learn science from me... Why? You have nothing to teach them.  Quite literally nothing at all. Your sole ground for rejecting peer review is that you did not get the results you wanted.  Buck up and do the work. Your current mess more nearly resembles a used diaper than science. Your categorization scheme produces false negatives and false positives.  Thus, it fails. It is merely a categorization scheme, and, as such, has zero explanatory power. You have nothing.  Do you get me? I will teach them real science...the science that cannot be defeated and cannot bring you down.. Your science is a joke! You have not presented anything about "our" science.  Science is neither under attack nor in dispute here. What you have does not qualify as science.  It is not even a candidate for consideration as it fails to approach even the minimum criteria. Further, your nonsense has been defeated on every point.  You have run away from every challenge -- you can't even defend your absurdities. All you have is an ad hoc pseudo-categorization scheme.  That scheme fails because, as we have shown, it produces both false positives and false negatives.  Which is to say, it fails to categorize. You lose. Do you understand us?

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 30 2015,06:34    Quote (NoName @ Oct. 30 2015,05:46) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 30 2015,06:23) Quote (NoName @ Oct. 28 2015,06:44)   Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 28 2015,04:35) ... Tell your peer-reviewers to learn science from me... Why? You have nothing to teach them.  Quite literally nothing at all. Your sole ground for rejecting peer review is that you did not get the results you wanted.  Buck up and do the work. Your current mess more nearly resembles a used diaper than science. Your categorization scheme produces false negatives and false positives.  Thus, it fails. It is merely a categorization scheme, and, as such, has zero explanatory power. You have nothing.  Do you get me? I will teach them real science...the science that cannot be defeated and cannot bring you down.. Your science is a joke! You have not presented anything about "our" science.  Science is neither under attack nor in dispute here. What you have does not qualify as science.  It is not even a candidate for consideration as it fails to approach even the minimum criteria. Further, your nonsense has been defeated on every point.  You have run away from every challenge -- you can't even defend your absurdities. All you have is an ad hoc pseudo-categorization scheme.  That scheme fails because, as we have shown, it produces both false positives and false negatives.  Which is to say, it fails to categorize. You lose. Do you understand us? Your science cannot categorize instinct to natural process...... YOU'RE A JOKE!!!

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 30 2015,06:46    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 30 2015,07:34) Quote (NoName @ Oct. 30 2015,05:46) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 30 2015,06:23)   Quote (NoName @ Oct. 28 2015,06:44)   Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 28 2015,04:35) ... Tell your peer-reviewers to learn science from me... Why? You have nothing to teach them.  Quite literally nothing at all. Your sole ground for rejecting peer review is that you did not get the results you wanted.  Buck up and do the work. Your current mess more nearly resembles a used diaper than science. Your categorization scheme produces false negatives and false positives.  Thus, it fails. It is merely a categorization scheme, and, as such, has zero explanatory power. You have nothing.  Do you get me? I will teach them real science...the science that cannot be defeated and cannot bring you down.. Your science is a joke! You have not presented anything about "our" science.  Science is neither under attack nor in dispute here. What you have does not qualify as science.  It is not even a candidate for consideration as it fails to approach even the minimum criteria. Further, your nonsense has been defeated on every point.  You have run away from every challenge -- you can't even defend your absurdities. All you have is an ad hoc pseudo-categorization scheme.  That scheme fails because, as we have shown, it produces both false positives and false negatives.  Which is to say, it fails to categorize. You lose. Do you understand us? Your science cannot categorize instinct to natural process...... YOU'RE A JOKE!!! Proof to the contrary was provided pages back. That you refuse to accept it, that you are incapable of understanding it, has zero bearing on the truth of the matter. You don't even know what the words mean. As to 'joke' -- you keep using that word, but it doesn't mean what you think it means.

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 30 2015,06:53    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 30 2015,07:34) ... Your science cannot categorize instinct to natural process...... YOU'RE A JOKE!!! Just by the way -- neither can you. It doesn't matter what flaws exist in other theories. What matters is what your notions can do, what flaws they have. The sad fact is your notions are nothing but flaws. You are unable to accomplish any of the things you complain science cannot do. You cannot do those things.  You cannot show that your assertions about science are correct. And when that is pointed out, all you can do is shout rude comments. That's not how science is done. And speaking of 'done', you seem to be finished.

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 30 2015,09:54    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 30 2015,13:21) [quote=EmperorZelos,Oct. 27 2015,07:03][quote=MrIntelligentDesign,Oct. 27 2015,03:44] Quote (Glen Davidson @ Oct. 26 2015,21:37)   Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 26 2015,21:21)   You have religion only... You got no science either because that requires peer-review! LOL!!! Bring me your best reviewers and we will fight intellectually in science... or SHUT UP! Done and dusted Edgar. You my boy are nothing but tard on toast. Do you get it? -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

fnxtr Posts: 3504 Joined: June 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 30 2015,15:59    -------------- "[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory "Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

Texas Teach Posts: 2084 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 30 2015,16:36    Quote (fnxtr @ Oct. 30 2015,15:59) Now comes the time on AtBC when we dance! -------------- "Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr "I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 30 2015,21:07    Quote (k.e.. @ Oct. 30 2015,09:54) [quote=MrIntelligentDesign,Oct. 30 2015,13:21][quote=EmperorZelos,Oct. 27 2015,07:03] Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 27 2015,03:44)   Quote (Glen Davidson @ Oct. 26 2015,21:37)     Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 26 2015,21:21)   You have religion only... You got no science either because that requires peer-review! LOL!!! Bring me your best reviewers and we will fight intellectually in science... or SHUT UP! Done and dusted Edgar. You my boy are nothing but tard on toast. Do you get it? LOL!!! You have nothing! No science! When your child ask you about "intelligence", what would be your answer without my new discovery? You will surely tell lie to your child.

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 30 2015,21:09    Quote (fnxtr @ Oct. 30 2015,15:59) Yes, you will get tired since you have no science but religion only. If you have science, you had already smashed my new discovery and live happily. But no! You have nothing! You have nothing! No science! When your child ask you about "intelligence", what would be your answer without my new discovery? You will surely tell lie to your child.

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 30 2015,21:10    Quote (Texas Teach @ Oct. 30 2015,16:36) Quote (fnxtr @ Oct. 30 2015,15:59) Now comes the time on AtBC when we dance! You dance in the tune of !DARWIN HAS NO SCIENCE.. Yes, you will get tired since you have no science but religion only. If you have science, you had already smashed my new discovery and live happily. But no! You have nothing! You have nothing! No science! When your child ask you about "intelligence", what would be your answer without my new discovery? You will surely tell lie to your child.

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 30 2015,21:11    Quote (NoName @ Oct. 30 2015,06:53) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 30 2015,07:34) ... Your science cannot categorize instinct to natural process...... YOU'RE A JOKE!!! Just by the way -- neither can you. It doesn't matter what flaws exist in other theories. What matters is what your notions can do, what flaws they have. The sad fact is your notions are nothing but flaws. You are unable to accomplish any of the things you complain science cannot do. You cannot do those things.  You cannot show that your assertions about science are correct. And when that is pointed out, all you can do is shout rude comments. That's not how science is done. And speaking of 'done', you seem to be finished. I did. I even had shown you how and the math.. BUT YOU HAVE NOTHING! You have religion only! If you have science, you had already smashed my new discovery and live happily. But no! You have nothing! You have nothing! No science! When your child ask you about "intelligence", what would be your answer without my new discovery? You will surely tell lie to your child.

EmperorZelos Posts: 81 Joined: Oct. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,01:31    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 30 2015,21:07) [quote=k.e..,Oct. 30 2015,09:54][quote=MrIntelligentDesign,Oct. 30 2015,13:21] Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 27 2015,07:03) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 27 2015,03:44)   Quote (Glen Davidson @ Oct. 26 2015,21:37)     Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 26 2015,21:21)   You have religion only... You got no science either because that requires peer-review! LOL!!! Bring me your best reviewers and we will fight intellectually in science... or SHUT UP! Done and dusted Edgar. You my boy are nothing but tard on toast. Do you get it? LOL!!! You have nothing! No science! When your child ask you about "intelligence", what would be your answer without my new discovery? You will surely tell lie to your child. Unless you provide us with the article and journal you published your "findings" in, you don't have any science while evolution has tonnes of it.

Quack Posts: 1961 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,02:07    Quote When your child ask you about "intelligence", what would be your answer without my new discovery? You will surely tell lie to your child. Allright. You won't tell a lie. You will tell the truth. Agreed? You can tell the truth about intelligence here, just like you would tell a child, without X - a child can't be expected to fathom the wonders you perform with X. -------------- Rocks have no biology.               Robert Byers.

ChemiCat Posts: 532 Joined: Nov. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,04:49    Postcardo; I do have real-science! Us; No, you don't. Postcardo; Do too! Us; Prove it. Postcardo; I have real-science!! Us; No you don't Postcardo; Do too and you're all poopy-heads! Us; So no evidence then and the "egg-drop" proves nothing. Postcardo; You atheist-scientists are religious!!!! Us; WHAT? Postcardo; I am the god of IA!!11!!!!one.## Does this sum up the thread so far?

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,06:10    Quote (ChemiCat @ Oct. 31 2015,05:49) Postcardo; I do have real-science! Us; No, you don't. Postcardo; Do too! Us; Prove it. Postcardo; I have real-science!! Us; No you don't Postcardo; Do too and you're all poopy-heads! Us; So no evidence then and the "egg-drop" proves nothing. Postcardo; You atheist-scientists are religious!!!! Us; WHAT? Postcardo; I am the god of IA!!11!!!!one.## Does this sum up the thread so far? Edgar's part is pretty accurately represented. Our side has presented a bit of logic, reasoning, evidence, and references, but I'm sure to Postretardo it looks just like us saying "No you don't". Pity, really.   A mind is a terrible thing to waste. Not that Edgar's takes up much space in a trash bag, but still.

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,07:32    Quote (NoName @ Oct. 31 2015,06:10) Quote (ChemiCat @ Oct. 31 2015,05:49) Postcardo; I do have real-science! Us; No, you don't. Postcardo; Do too! Us; Prove it. Postcardo; I have real-science!! Us; No you don't Postcardo; Do too and you're all poopy-heads! Us; So no evidence then and the "egg-drop" proves nothing. Postcardo; You atheist-scientists are religious!!!! Us; WHAT? Postcardo; I am the god of IA!!11!!!!one.## Does this sum up the thread so far? Edgar's part is pretty accurately represented. Our side has presented a bit of logic, reasoning, evidence, and references, but I'm sure to Postretardo it looks just like us saying "No you don't". Pity, really.   A mind is a terrible thing to waste. Not that Edgar's takes up much space in a trash bag, but still. YOU'RE FUNNY! In science, if you think you have something to say, you can just write book on it and make any replacement for existing explanations.. I have all of them...you have nothing! Intelligence? I have, you don't! Evolution? Obsolete..I have Biological Interrelation, BiTs... You have no science..I have the best science... That is why PUT UP or SHUT UP!

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,07:34    Quote (ChemiCat @ Oct. 31 2015,04:49) Postcardo; I do have real-science! Us; No, you don't. Postcardo; Do too! Us; Prove it. Postcardo; I have real-science!! Us; No you don't Postcardo; Do too and you're all poopy-heads! Us; So no evidence then and the "egg-drop" proves nothing. Postcardo; You atheist-scientists are religious!!!! Us; WHAT? Postcardo; I am the god of IA!!11!!!!one.## Does this sum up the thread so far? YOU'RE FUNNY! In science, if you think you have something to say, you can just write book on it and make any replacement for existing explanations.. I have all of them...you have nothing! Intelligence? I have, you don't! Evolution? Obsolete..I have Biological Interrelation, BiTs... You have no science..I have the best science... That is why PUT UP or SHUT UP! I have written six science books and you did not even bother to read the free excerpts...thus, you are lazy, lying and fraud!

Pages: (42) < ... 32 33 34 35 36 [37] 38 39 40 41 42 ... >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard