Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > Joe G.'s Tardgasm

Pages: (919) < ... 304 305 306 307 308 [309] 310 311 312 313 314 ... >

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,11:43    Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:35) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31) Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:29)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:22)   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:19)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:12)       Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:11)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:05)         Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:03)         Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:59)           Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:55)           Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:52)             Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:50) Well that was fun Joe 100% FAIL  on math and reading PLUS the designer is some dude call Spetner. Yes, Davey, we already know that you are an ignorant asshole who couldn't follow along if its life depended on it. And you are a LIAR. What math did I fail, Davey? What reading did I fail, Davey? Where did I say that Spetner was the designer, Davey? Please be specific, show your work or admit that you are just another pathetic evoTARD. 10 meters wavelength Joe 100% fail Again you prove that you are a dishonest freak. Is your dishonesty supposed to mean something? Mr toaster repair man lose his calculator? http://www.dxing.com/frequen....enc.htm         Quote There are different ways to indicate where to find a certain station on a radio dial. For example, we could say that a station is operating on 9680 kiloHertz (kHz), 9.68 megahertz (MHz), or on 31 meters. And all three ways would be correct! Wow, that agrees with what I said! OK so what you meant to say was an Electromagnetic Wave with a speed of 300,000,000 kilometers per hour in free space. What is the frequency of that same wave in coaxial cable with a velocity factor of 0.7? Hint it's different. Your desperation is still showing. Do you understand English or not? What everyone else except you get Joe is that frequency of a wave is dependent on more than length. It is dependent on speed and the permeability of the transmission medium as well as the wavelength. And seriously using a cherry picked quote from some piss ant lay website when Wiki has the full story. All class Joe. Davey, go fuck yourself. I know what the frequency is depended on. That is why I made my SPECIFIC claim. Lamda = Speed / Frequency its on wikipedia Joe except I didn't have to look it up. You know what lamda is right Joe? Maybe you should get someone to read it to you one day what with your dyslexia. Yes, davey, we know all of that. Again that is why I made a specific claim- a claim that you are desperately trying to change. 1/T works The claim was FALSE you made an assumption. Lambda = speed x 1 second. Where do you think the 1/T came from Moron. 1/T works, moron, regardless of the medium. My claim still holds- if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency. They are two different numerical representations of the SAME wave -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,11:44    Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:40) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31) Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:30)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:24)   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:23)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:21)     Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,11:13)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,08:08) If probability is defined as something that has a chance, AND impossible means that there isn't a chance, how can something impossible have a probability? Do tell. As the rest of us don't define probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy, this is a question that can only be answered by the world's leadingonly authority on Joemath, i.e. you. Maybe you should go talk to Gary Gaulin, Joe.  He has a making-shit-up personal version of science.  You have a making-shit-up personal version of mathematics.  Looks like a fit. Well Johnny, I found a reference that defines it that way. So you lose, asshole Joe found a reference that agreed with his FAIL. Classic. Fuck you, asshole. We have noticed that not one of you have provided any references Who's we Joe? Your toothless cousins looking over your shoulders? Well davey, if we ever meet you will become toothless in very little time. Where are you working now Joe since you got sacked for making threats from a work computer. Why a janitor needs to use a computer I don't know. Order more drain freshners? I'll bet they thank God everyday for you not being there Davey, this isn't a threat, it's a promise. And no court would ever entertain your claim of a threat as you are being an asshole and deserve what you get. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,11:46    Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:40) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31) Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:30)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:24)   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:23)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:21)     Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,11:13)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,08:08) If probability is defined as something that has a chance, AND impossible means that there isn't a chance, how can something impossible have a probability? Do tell. As the rest of us don't define probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy, this is a question that can only be answered by the world's leadingonly authority on Joemath, i.e. you. Maybe you should go talk to Gary Gaulin, Joe.  He has a making-shit-up personal version of science.  You have a making-shit-up personal version of mathematics.  Looks like a fit. Well Johnny, I found a reference that defines it that way. So you lose, asshole Joe found a reference that agreed with his FAIL. Classic. Fuck you, asshole. We have noticed that not one of you have provided any references Who's we Joe? Your toothless cousins looking over your shoulders? Well davey, if we ever meet you will become toothless in very little time. Where are you working now Joe since you got sacked for making threats from a work computer. Why a janitor needs to use a computer I don't know. Order more drain freshners? I'll bet they thank God everyday for you not being there And Stratus now has less than 1/2 the employees it had when I was there. It was a great career move leaving them as I went to a better place making more money than Stratus would ever pay. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

JohnW Posts: 3217 Joined: Aug. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,11:50    Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,09:21) Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,11:13) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,08:08) If probability is defined as something that has a chance, AND impossible means that there isn't a chance, how can something impossible have a probability? Do tell. As the rest of us don't define probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy, this is a question that can only be answered by the world's leadingonly authority on Joemath, i.e. you. Maybe you should go talk to Gary Gaulin, Joe.  He has a making-shit-up personal version of science.  You have a making-shit-up personal version of mathematics.  Looks like a fit. Well Johnny, I found a reference that defines it that way. So you lose, asshole Oh do tell.   You are aware that "My Big Book Of Sweary Math Stuff" by JoeG doesn't count, yes?  Even if you've moved on from crayon to pencil now. -------------- Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,11:50    Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:43) Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:35)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:29)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:22)     Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:19)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:12)         Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:11)         Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:05)           Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:03)           Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:59)             Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:55)             Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:52)               Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:50) Well that was fun Joe 100% FAIL  on math and reading PLUS the designer is some dude call Spetner. Yes, Davey, we already know that you are an ignorant asshole who couldn't follow along if its life depended on it. And you are a LIAR. What math did I fail, Davey? What reading did I fail, Davey? Where did I say that Spetner was the designer, Davey? Please be specific, show your work or admit that you are just another pathetic evoTARD. 10 meters wavelength Joe 100% fail Again you prove that you are a dishonest freak. Is your dishonesty supposed to mean something? Mr toaster repair man lose his calculator? http://www.dxing.com/frequen....enc.htm           Quote There are different ways to indicate where to find a certain station on a radio dial. For example, we could say that a station is operating on 9680 kiloHertz (kHz), 9.68 megahertz (MHz), or on 31 meters. And all three ways would be correct! Wow, that agrees with what I said! OK so what you meant to say was an Electromagnetic Wave with a speed of 300,000,000 kilometers per hour in free space. What is the frequency of that same wave in coaxial cable with a velocity factor of 0.7? Hint it's different. Your desperation is still showing. Do you understand English or not? What everyone else except you get Joe is that frequency of a wave is dependent on more than length. It is dependent on speed and the permeability of the transmission medium as well as the wavelength. And seriously using a cherry picked quote from some piss ant lay website when Wiki has the full story. All class Joe. Davey, go fuck yourself. I know what the frequency is depended on. That is why I made my SPECIFIC claim. Lamda = Speed / Frequency its on wikipedia Joe except I didn't have to look it up. You know what lamda is right Joe? Maybe you should get someone to read it to you one day what with your dyslexia. Yes, davey, we know all of that. Again that is why I made a specific claim- a claim that you are desperately trying to change. 1/T works The claim was FALSE you made an assumption. Lambda = speed x 1 second. Where do you think the 1/T came from Moron. 1/T works, moron, regardless of the medium. My claim still holds- if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency. They are two different numerical representations of the SAME wave I see where the problem is here. In physics there is a difference in meaning between 1/T and 1/t. No Joe the speed of a wave is dependent on permeability of the medium the wavelength changes in the medium and the frequency remains constant wrt a vacuum. Basic stuff mr toaster repair man -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,11:51    Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:44) Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:40)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:30)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:24)     Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:23)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:21)       Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,11:13)         Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,08:08) If probability is defined as something that has a chance, AND impossible means that there isn't a chance, how can something impossible have a probability? Do tell. As the rest of us don't define probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy, this is a question that can only be answered by the world's leadingonly authority on Joemath, i.e. you. Maybe you should go talk to Gary Gaulin, Joe.  He has a making-shit-up personal version of science.  You have a making-shit-up personal version of mathematics.  Looks like a fit. Well Johnny, I found a reference that defines it that way. So you lose, asshole Joe found a reference that agreed with his FAIL. Classic. Fuck you, asshole. We have noticed that not one of you have provided any references Who's we Joe? Your toothless cousins looking over your shoulders? Well davey, if we ever meet you will become toothless in very little time. Where are you working now Joe since you got sacked for making threats from a work computer. Why a janitor needs to use a computer I don't know. Order more drain freshners? I'll bet they thank God everyday for you not being there Davey, this isn't a threat, it's a promise. And no court would ever entertain your claim of a threat as you are being an asshole and deserve what you get. Did you get another job Joe? What do you put on your CV? Sacked for being a cunt? -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,11:51    Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,11:50) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,09:21) Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,11:13)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,08:08) If probability is defined as something that has a chance, AND impossible means that there isn't a chance, how can something impossible have a probability? Do tell. As the rest of us don't define probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy, this is a question that can only be answered by the world's leadingonly authority on Joemath, i.e. you. Maybe you should go talk to Gary Gaulin, Joe.  He has a making-shit-up personal version of science.  You have a making-shit-up personal version of mathematics.  Looks like a fit. Well Johnny, I found a reference that defines it that way. So you lose, asshole Oh do tell.   You are aware that "My Big Book Of Sweary Math Stuff" by JoeG doesn't count, yes?  Even if you've moved on from crayon to pencil now. Hey asshole, why is it that you cannot present a definition of probability? -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,11:52    Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:50) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:43) Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:35)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:29)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:22)     Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:19)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:12)         Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:11)         Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:05)           Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:03)           Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:59)             Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:55)             Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:52)               Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:50) Well that was fun Joe 100% FAIL  on math and reading PLUS the designer is some dude call Spetner. Yes, Davey, we already know that you are an ignorant asshole who couldn't follow along if its life depended on it. And you are a LIAR. What math did I fail, Davey? What reading did I fail, Davey? Where did I say that Spetner was the designer, Davey? Please be specific, show your work or admit that you are just another pathetic evoTARD. 10 meters wavelength Joe 100% fail Again you prove that you are a dishonest freak. Is your dishonesty supposed to mean something? Mr toaster repair man lose his calculator? http://www.dxing.com/frequen....enc.htm           Quote There are different ways to indicate where to find a certain station on a radio dial. For example, we could say that a station is operating on 9680 kiloHertz (kHz), 9.68 megahertz (MHz), or on 31 meters. And all three ways would be correct! Wow, that agrees with what I said! OK so what you meant to say was an Electromagnetic Wave with a speed of 300,000,000 kilometers per hour in free space. What is the frequency of that same wave in coaxial cable with a velocity factor of 0.7? Hint it's different. Your desperation is still showing. Do you understand English or not? What everyone else except you get Joe is that frequency of a wave is dependent on more than length. It is dependent on speed and the permeability of the transmission medium as well as the wavelength. And seriously using a cherry picked quote from some piss ant lay website when Wiki has the full story. All class Joe. Davey, go fuck yourself. I know what the frequency is depended on. That is why I made my SPECIFIC claim. Lamda = Speed / Frequency its on wikipedia Joe except I didn't have to look it up. You know what lamda is right Joe? Maybe you should get someone to read it to you one day what with your dyslexia. Yes, davey, we know all of that. Again that is why I made a specific claim- a claim that you are desperately trying to change. 1/T works The claim was FALSE you made an assumption. Lambda = speed x 1 second. Where do you think the 1/T came from Moron. 1/T works, moron, regardless of the medium. My claim still holds- if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency. They are two different numerical representations of the SAME wave I see where the problem is here. In physics there is a difference in meaning between 1/T and 1/t. No Joe the speed of a wave is dependent on permeability of the medium the wavelength changes inmedium and the frequency remains constant wrt a vacuum. Basic stuff mr toaster repair man You are still not saying anything we didn't already know. 1/T still works, moron. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,11:55    https://www.mathsisfun.com/definit....ty.html http://home.avvanta.com/~math....ability https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki....ability -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,11:55    Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:51) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:44)   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:40)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)     Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:30)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:24)       Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:23)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:21)         Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,11:13)         Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,08:08) If probability is defined as something that has a chance, AND impossible means that there isn't a chance, how can something impossible have a probability? Do tell. As the rest of us don't define probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy, this is a question that can only be answered by the world's leadingonly authority on Joemath, i.e. you. Maybe you should go talk to Gary Gaulin, Joe.  He has a making-shit-up personal version of science.  You have a making-shit-up personal version of mathematics.  Looks like a fit. Well Johnny, I found a reference that defines it that way. So you lose, asshole Joe found a reference that agreed with his FAIL. Classic. Fuck you, asshole. We have noticed that not one of you have provided any references Who's we Joe? Your toothless cousins looking over your shoulders? Well davey, if we ever meet you will become toothless in very little time. Where are you working now Joe since you got sacked for making threats from a work computer. Why a janitor needs to use a computer I don't know. Order more drain freshners? I'll bet they thank God everyday for you not being there Davey, this isn't a threat, it's a promise. And no court would ever entertain your claim of a threat as you are being an asshole and deserve what you get. Did you get another job Joe? What do you put on your CV? Sacked for being a cunt? Yes, I got a job fucking your mother while your father watched. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,11:56    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki....equency -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,11:57    Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:52) Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:50) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:43)   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:35)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)     Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:29)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:22)       Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:19)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:12)         Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:11)           Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:05)           Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:03)             Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:59)             Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:55)               Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:52)               Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:50) Well that was fun Joe 100% FAIL  on math and reading PLUS the designer is some dude call Spetner. Yes, Davey, we already know that you are an ignorant asshole who couldn't follow along if its life depended on it. And you are a LIAR. What math did I fail, Davey? What reading did I fail, Davey? Where did I say that Spetner was the designer, Davey? Please be specific, show your work or admit that you are just another pathetic evoTARD. 10 meters wavelength Joe 100% fail Again you prove that you are a dishonest freak. Is your dishonesty supposed to mean something? Mr toaster repair man lose his calculator? http://www.dxing.com/frequen....enc.htm             Quote There are different ways to indicate where to find a certain station on a radio dial. For example, we could say that a station is operating on 9680 kiloHertz (kHz), 9.68 megahertz (MHz), or on 31 meters. And all three ways would be correct! Wow, that agrees with what I said! OK so what you meant to say was an Electromagnetic Wave with a speed of 300,000,000 kilometers per hour in free space. What is the frequency of that same wave in coaxial cable with a velocity factor of 0.7? Hint it's different. Your desperation is still showing. Do you understand English or not? What everyone else except you get Joe is that frequency of a wave is dependent on more than length. It is dependent on speed and the permeability of the transmission medium as well as the wavelength. And seriously using a cherry picked quote from some piss ant lay website when Wiki has the full story. All class Joe. Davey, go fuck yourself. I know what the frequency is depended on. That is why I made my SPECIFIC claim. Lamda = Speed / Frequency its on wikipedia Joe except I didn't have to look it up. You know what lamda is right Joe? Maybe you should get someone to read it to you one day what with your dyslexia. Yes, davey, we know all of that. Again that is why I made a specific claim- a claim that you are desperately trying to change. 1/T works The claim was FALSE you made an assumption. Lambda = speed x 1 second. Where do you think the 1/T came from Moron. 1/T works, moron, regardless of the medium. My claim still holds- if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency. They are two different numerical representations of the SAME wave I see where the problem is here. In physics there is a difference in meaning between 1/T and 1/t. No Joe the speed of a wave is dependent on permeability of the medium the wavelength changes inmedium and the frequency remains constant wrt a vacuum. Basic stuff mr toaster repair man You are still not saying anything we didn't already know. 1/T still works, moron. False Joe your 1/t is one second you don't kneed to write 1/t (T is Temp but you knew that Joe RIGHT?) Hey Joes toothless cousins give Joe a clap for being a cunt. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

OgreMkV Posts: 3668 Joined: Oct. 2009 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,11:58    Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,11:43) 1/T works, moron, regardless of the medium. My claim still holds- if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency. They are two different numerical representations of the SAME wave And we've already proven, multiple times, that you can't do that. You are just too arrogant and meglomanical to see it. What is the frequency of a sound wave with a wavelength of 1 meter? -------------- Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims. http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,11:59    Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:55) Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:51) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:44)   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:40)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)     Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:30)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:24)       Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:23)         Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:21)         Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,11:13)           Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,08:08) If probability is defined as something that has a chance, AND impossible means that there isn't a chance, how can something impossible have a probability? Do tell. As the rest of us don't define probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy, this is a question that can only be answered by the world's leadingonly authority on Joemath, i.e. you. Maybe you should go talk to Gary Gaulin, Joe.  He has a making-shit-up personal version of science.  You have a making-shit-up personal version of mathematics.  Looks like a fit. Well Johnny, I found a reference that defines it that way. So you lose, asshole Joe found a reference that agreed with his FAIL. Classic. Fuck you, asshole. We have noticed that not one of you have provided any references Who's we Joe? Your toothless cousins looking over your shoulders? Well davey, if we ever meet you will become toothless in very little time. Where are you working now Joe since you got sacked for making threats from a work computer. Why a janitor needs to use a computer I don't know. Order more drain freshners? I'll bet they thank God everyday for you not being there Davey, this isn't a threat, it's a promise. And no court would ever entertain your claim of a threat as you are being an asshole and deserve what you get. Did you get another job Joe? What do you put on your CV? Sacked for being a cunt? Yes, I got a job fucking your mother while your father watched. She already told me she said you were done after 2 strokes. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,11:59    Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:57) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:52) Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:50)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:43)   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:35)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)     Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:29)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:22)       Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:19)         Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:12)           Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:11)           Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:05)             Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:03)             Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:59)               Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:55)               Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:52)                 Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:50) Well that was fun Joe 100% FAIL  on math and reading PLUS the designer is some dude call Spetner. Yes, Davey, we already know that you are an ignorant asshole who couldn't follow along if its life depended on it. And you are a LIAR. What math did I fail, Davey? What reading did I fail, Davey? Where did I say that Spetner was the designer, Davey? Please be specific, show your work or admit that you are just another pathetic evoTARD. 10 meters wavelength Joe 100% fail Again you prove that you are a dishonest freak. Is your dishonesty supposed to mean something? Mr toaster repair man lose his calculator? http://www.dxing.com/frequen....enc.htm             Quote There are different ways to indicate where to find a certain station on a radio dial. For example, we could say that a station is operating on 9680 kiloHertz (kHz), 9.68 megahertz (MHz), or on 31 meters. And all three ways would be correct! Wow, that agrees with what I said! OK so what you meant to say was an Electromagnetic Wave with a speed of 300,000,000 kilometers per hour in free space. What is the frequency of that same wave in coaxial cable with a velocity factor of 0.7? Hint it's different. Your desperation is still showing. Do you understand English or not? What everyone else except you get Joe is that frequency of a wave is dependent on more than length. It is dependent on speed and the permeability of the transmission medium as well as the wavelength. And seriously using a cherry picked quote from some piss ant lay website when Wiki has the full story. All class Joe. Davey, go fuck yourself. I know what the frequency is depended on. That is why I made my SPECIFIC claim. Lamda = Speed / Frequency its on wikipedia Joe except I didn't have to look it up. You know what lamda is right Joe? Maybe you should get someone to read it to you one day what with your dyslexia. Yes, davey, we know all of that. Again that is why I made a specific claim- a claim that you are desperately trying to change. 1/T works The claim was FALSE you made an assumption. Lambda = speed x 1 second. Where do you think the 1/T came from Moron. 1/T works, moron, regardless of the medium. My claim still holds- if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency. They are two different numerical representations of the SAME wave I see where the problem is here. In physics there is a difference in meaning between 1/T and 1/t. No Joe the speed of a wave is dependent on permeability of the medium the wavelength changes inmedium and the frequency remains constant wrt a vacuum. Basic stuff mr toaster repair man You are still not saying anything we didn't already know. 1/T still works, moron. False Joe your 1/t is one second you don't kneed to write 1/t (T is Temp but you knew that Joe RIGHT?) Hey Joes toothless cousins give Joe a clap for being a cunt. No, davey, it is T as in 1/T for the frequency. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

JohnW Posts: 3217 Joined: Aug. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:00    Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,09:55) https://www.mathsisfun.com/definit....ty.html http://home.avvanta.com/~math......ability https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......ability So where is your reference defining probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy?  It's none of those. -------------- Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:00    Quote (OgreMkV @ June 24 2015,11:58) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,11:43) 1/T works, moron, regardless of the medium. My claim still holds- if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency. They are two different numerical representations of the SAME wave And we've already proven, multiple times, that you can't do that. You are just too arrogant and meglomanical to see it. What is the frequency of a sound wave with a wavelength of 1 meter? No, Kevin, you are a moron who couldn't prove anything. I HAVE TO HAVE THE WAVELENGTH, MORON. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:01    Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,12:00) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,09:55) https://www.mathsisfun.com/definit....ty.html http://home.avvanta.com/~math......ability https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......ability So where is your reference defining probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy?  It's none of those. First link: Probability is the chance that something will happen - Dumbass Johnny strikes again -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:02    Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:59) Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:57) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:52)   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:50)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:43)     Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:35)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)       Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:29)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:22)         Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:19)         Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:12)           Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:11)             Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:05)             Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:03)               Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:59)               Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:55)                 Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:52)                 Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:50) Well that was fun Joe 100% FAIL  on math and reading PLUS the designer is some dude call Spetner. Yes, Davey, we already know that you are an ignorant asshole who couldn't follow along if its life depended on it. And you are a LIAR. What math did I fail, Davey? What reading did I fail, Davey? Where did I say that Spetner was the designer, Davey? Please be specific, show your work or admit that you are just another pathetic evoTARD. 10 meters wavelength Joe 100% fail Again you prove that you are a dishonest freak. Is your dishonesty supposed to mean something? Mr toaster repair man lose his calculator? http://www.dxing.com/frequen....enc.htm               Quote There are different ways to indicate where to find a certain station on a radio dial. For example, we could say that a station is operating on 9680 kiloHertz (kHz), 9.68 megahertz (MHz), or on 31 meters. And all three ways would be correct! Wow, that agrees with what I said! OK so what you meant to say was an Electromagnetic Wave with a speed of 300,000,000 kilometers per hour in free space. What is the frequency of that same wave in coaxial cable with a velocity factor of 0.7? Hint it's different. Your desperation is still showing. Do you understand English or not? What everyone else except you get Joe is that frequency of a wave is dependent on more than length. It is dependent on speed and the permeability of the transmission medium as well as the wavelength. And seriously using a cherry picked quote from some piss ant lay website when Wiki has the full story. All class Joe. Davey, go fuck yourself. I know what the frequency is depended on. That is why I made my SPECIFIC claim. Lamda = Speed / Frequency its on wikipedia Joe except I didn't have to look it up. You know what lamda is right Joe? Maybe you should get someone to read it to you one day what with your dyslexia. Yes, davey, we know all of that. Again that is why I made a specific claim- a claim that you are desperately trying to change. 1/T works The claim was FALSE you made an assumption. Lambda = speed x 1 second. Where do you think the 1/T came from Moron. 1/T works, moron, regardless of the medium. My claim still holds- if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency. They are two different numerical representations of the SAME wave I see where the problem is here. In physics there is a difference in meaning between 1/T and 1/t. No Joe the speed of a wave is dependent on permeability of the medium the wavelength changes inmedium and the frequency remains constant wrt a vacuum. Basic stuff mr toaster repair man You are still not saying anything we didn't already know. 1/T still works, moron. False Joe your 1/t is one second you don't kneed to write 1/t (T is Temp but you knew that Joe RIGHT?) Hey Joes toothless cousins give Joe a clap for being a cunt. No, davey, it is T as in 1/T for the frequency. Joe take some night classes you might learn something. You should be able to fit it in between car stealing and ICE cooking. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:02    Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:59) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:55) Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:51)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:44)     Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:40)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)       Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:30)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:24)         Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:23)         Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:21)           Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,11:13)           Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,08:08) If probability is defined as something that has a chance, AND impossible means that there isn't a chance, how can something impossible have a probability? Do tell. As the rest of us don't define probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy, this is a question that can only be answered by the world's leadingonly authority on Joemath, i.e. you. Maybe you should go talk to Gary Gaulin, Joe.  He has a making-shit-up personal version of science.  You have a making-shit-up personal version of mathematics.  Looks like a fit. Well Johnny, I found a reference that defines it that way. So you lose, asshole Joe found a reference that agreed with his FAIL. Classic. Fuck you, asshole. We have noticed that not one of you have provided any references Who's we Joe? Your toothless cousins looking over your shoulders? Well davey, if we ever meet you will become toothless in very little time. Where are you working now Joe since you got sacked for making threats from a work computer. Why a janitor needs to use a computer I don't know. Order more drain freshners? I'll bet they thank God everyday for you not being there Davey, this isn't a threat, it's a promise. And no court would ever entertain your claim of a threat as you are being an asshole and deserve what you get. Did you get another job Joe? What do you put on your CV? Sacked for being a cunt? Yes, I got a job fucking your mother while your father watched. She already told me she said you were done after 2 strokes. I stopped after two because she was such a dried up hag I didn't want to get my dick all raw. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:02    Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,12:02) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:59) Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:57)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:52)   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:50)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:43)     Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:35)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)       Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:29)         Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:22)         Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:19)           Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:12)             Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:11)             Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:05)               Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:03)               Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:59)                 Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:55)                 Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:52)                   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:50) Well that was fun Joe 100% FAIL  on math and reading PLUS the designer is some dude call Spetner. Yes, Davey, we already know that you are an ignorant asshole who couldn't follow along if its life depended on it. And you are a LIAR. What math did I fail, Davey? What reading did I fail, Davey? Where did I say that Spetner was the designer, Davey? Please be specific, show your work or admit that you are just another pathetic evoTARD. 10 meters wavelength Joe 100% fail Again you prove that you are a dishonest freak. Is your dishonesty supposed to mean something? Mr toaster repair man lose his calculator? http://www.dxing.com/frequen....enc.htm               Quote There are different ways to indicate where to find a certain station on a radio dial. For example, we could say that a station is operating on 9680 kiloHertz (kHz), 9.68 megahertz (MHz), or on 31 meters. And all three ways would be correct! Wow, that agrees with what I said! OK so what you meant to say was an Electromagnetic Wave with a speed of 300,000,000 kilometers per hour in free space. What is the frequency of that same wave in coaxial cable with a velocity factor of 0.7? Hint it's different. Your desperation is still showing. Do you understand English or not? What everyone else except you get Joe is that frequency of a wave is dependent on more than length. It is dependent on speed and the permeability of the transmission medium as well as the wavelength. And seriously using a cherry picked quote from some piss ant lay website when Wiki has the full story. All class Joe. Davey, go fuck yourself. I know what the frequency is depended on. That is why I made my SPECIFIC claim. Lamda = Speed / Frequency its on wikipedia Joe except I didn't have to look it up. You know what lamda is right Joe? Maybe you should get someone to read it to you one day what with your dyslexia. Yes, davey, we know all of that. Again that is why I made a specific claim- a claim that you are desperately trying to change. 1/T works The claim was FALSE you made an assumption. Lambda = speed x 1 second. Where do you think the 1/T came from Moron. 1/T works, moron, regardless of the medium. My claim still holds- if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency. They are two different numerical representations of the SAME wave I see where the problem is here. In physics there is a difference in meaning between 1/T and 1/t. No Joe the speed of a wave is dependent on permeability of the medium the wavelength changes inmedium and the frequency remains constant wrt a vacuum. Basic stuff mr toaster repair man You are still not saying anything we didn't already know. 1/T still works, moron. False Joe your 1/t is one second you don't kneed to write 1/t (T is Temp but you knew that Joe RIGHT?) Hey Joes toothless cousins give Joe a clap for being a cunt. No, davey, it is T as in 1/T for the frequency. Joe take some night classes you might learn something. You should be able to fit it in between car stealing and ICE cooking. You need the classes, moron. I provided a reference that supports my claim -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

JohnW Posts: 3217 Joined: Aug. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:05    Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,10:01) Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,12:00) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,09:55) https://www.mathsisfun.com/definit....ty.html http://home.avvanta.com/~math......ability https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......ability So where is your reference defining probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy?  It's none of those. First link: Probability is the chance that something will happen - Dumbass Johnny strikes again "The chance that something will happen" and "something that has a chance" have different meanings, at least in English.  In Joeish, who knows? -------------- Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:06    Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,12:05) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,10:01) Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,12:00)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,09:55) https://www.mathsisfun.com/definit....ty.html http://home.avvanta.com/~math......ability https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......ability So where is your reference defining probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy?  It's none of those. First link: Probability is the chance that something will happen - Dumbass Johnny strikes again "The chance that something will happen" and "something that has a chance" have different meanings, at least in English.  In Joeish, who knows? P,lease explain the alleged differences. Your say-so isn't any good and we all know that you are a piece-of-shit loser -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:15    Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,20:02) Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,12:02) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:59)   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:57)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:52)     Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:50)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:43)       Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:35)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)         Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:29)         Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:22)           Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:19)           Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:12)             Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:11)               Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:05)               Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:03)                 Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:59)                 Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:55)                   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:52)                   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:50) Well that was fun Joe 100% FAIL  on math and reading PLUS the designer is some dude call Spetner. Yes, Davey, we already know that you are an ignorant asshole who couldn't follow along if its life depended on it. And you are a LIAR. What math did I fail, Davey? What reading did I fail, Davey? Where did I say that Spetner was the designer, Davey? Please be specific, show your work or admit that you are just another pathetic evoTARD. 10 meters wavelength Joe 100% fail Again you prove that you are a dishonest freak. Is your dishonesty supposed to mean something? Mr toaster repair man lose his calculator? http://www.dxing.com/frequen....enc.htm                 Quote There are different ways to indicate where to find a certain station on a radio dial. For example, we could say that a station is operating on 9680 kiloHertz (kHz), 9.68 megahertz (MHz), or on 31 meters. And all three ways would be correct! Wow, that agrees with what I said! OK so what you meant to say was an Electromagnetic Wave with a speed of 300,000,000 kilometers per hour in free space. What is the frequency of that same wave in coaxial cable with a velocity factor of 0.7? Hint it's different. Your desperation is still showing. Do you understand English or not? What everyone else except you get Joe is that frequency of a wave is dependent on more than length. It is dependent on speed and the permeability of the transmission medium as well as the wavelength. And seriously using a cherry picked quote from some piss ant lay website when Wiki has the full story. All class Joe. Davey, go fuck yourself. I know what the frequency is depended on. That is why I made my SPECIFIC claim. Lamda = Speed / Frequency its on wikipedia Joe except I didn't have to look it up. You know what lamda is right Joe? Maybe you should get someone to read it to you one day what with your dyslexia. Yes, davey, we know all of that. Again that is why I made a specific claim- a claim that you are desperately trying to change. 1/T works The claim was FALSE you made an assumption. Lambda = speed x 1 second. Where do you think the 1/T came from Moron. 1/T works, moron, regardless of the medium. My claim still holds- if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency. They are two different numerical representations of the SAME wave I see where the problem is here. In physics there is a difference in meaning between 1/T and 1/t. No Joe the speed of a wave is dependent on permeability of the medium the wavelength changes inmedium and the frequency remains constant wrt a vacuum. Basic stuff mr toaster repair man You are still not saying anything we didn't already know. 1/T still works, moron. False Joe your 1/t is one second you don't kneed to write 1/t (T is Temp but you knew that Joe RIGHT?) Hey Joes toothless cousins give Joe a clap for being a cunt. No, davey, it is T as in 1/T for the frequency. Joe take some night classes you might learn something. You should be able to fit it in between car stealing and ICE cooking. You need the classes, moron. I provided a reference that supports my claim That reference refers to the 31 meter short wave band which covers several Megahertz it is not the actual wavelength. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

JohnW Posts: 3217 Joined: Aug. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:15    Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,10:06) Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,12:05) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,10:01)   Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,12:00)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,09:55) https://www.mathsisfun.com/definit....ty.html http://home.avvanta.com/~math......ability https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......ability So where is your reference defining probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy?  It's none of those. First link: Probability is the chance that something will happen - Dumbass Johnny strikes again "The chance that something will happen" and "something that has a chance" have different meanings, at least in English.  In Joeish, who knows? P,lease explain the alleged differences. Your say-so isn't any good and we all know that you are a piece-of-shit loser OK, Joe.  I forgot the level of education I was dealing with here. "The chance that something will happen" is a decent definition of probability, as in  The probability that Joe will admit he is wrong, based on empirical evidence, is zero. But if probability is "something that has a chance"?  That would mean that probability is the thing having the chance to occur, not the chance itself.  So in the above sentence, the probability would be "Joe admitting he is wrong," not "zero."  Which makes no sense to anyone, except possibly you. Have you got that now, or would you like me to try again with shorter words? -------------- Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:18    Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,12:15) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,10:06) Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,12:05)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,10:01)   Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,12:00)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,09:55) https://www.mathsisfun.com/definit....ty.html http://home.avvanta.com/~math......ability https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......ability So where is your reference defining probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy?  It's none of those. First link: Probability is the chance that something will happen - Dumbass Johnny strikes again "The chance that something will happen" and "something that has a chance" have different meanings, at least in English.  In Joeish, who knows? P,lease explain the alleged differences. Your say-so isn't any good and we all know that you are a piece-of-shit loser OK, Joe.  I forgot the level of education I was dealing with here. "The chance that something will happen" is a decent definition of probability, as in  The probability that Joe will admit he is wrong, based on empirical evidence, is zero. But if probability is "something that has a chance"?  That would mean that probability is the thing having the chance to occur, not the chance itself.  So in the above sentence, the probability would be "Joe admitting he is wrong," not "zero."  Which makes no sense to anyone, except possibly you. Have you got that now, or would you like me to try again with shorter words? LoL! Thankfully you aren't a teacher. If something has a chance that would mean there is a chance that it will happen. That means "The chance that something will happen" is the same as "something that has a chance". -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:19    Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,20:02) Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:59) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:55)   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:51)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:44)     Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:40)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)       Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:30)         Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:24)         Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:23)           Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:21)           Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,11:13)             Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,08:08) If probability is defined as something that has a chance, AND impossible means that there isn't a chance, how can something impossible have a probability? Do tell. As the rest of us don't define probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy, this is a question that can only be answered by the world's leadingonly authority on Joemath, i.e. you. Maybe you should go talk to Gary Gaulin, Joe.  He has a making-shit-up personal version of science.  You have a making-shit-up personal version of mathematics.  Looks like a fit. Well Johnny, I found a reference that defines it that way. So you lose, asshole Joe found a reference that agreed with his FAIL. Classic. Fuck you, asshole. We have noticed that not one of you have provided any references Who's we Joe? Your toothless cousins looking over your shoulders? Well davey, if we ever meet you will become toothless in very little time. Where are you working now Joe since you got sacked for making threats from a work computer. Why a janitor needs to use a computer I don't know. Order more drain freshners? I'll bet they thank God everyday for you not being there Davey, this isn't a threat, it's a promise. And no court would ever entertain your claim of a threat as you are being an asshole and deserve what you get. Did you get another job Joe? What do you put on your CV? Sacked for being a cunt? Yes, I got a job fucking your mother while your father watched. She already told me she said you were done after 2 strokes. I stopped after two because she was such a dried up hag I didn't want to get my dick all raw. That's not what she said. She said it was so small she couldn't feel it. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:19    Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,12:15) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,20:02) Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,12:02)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:59)   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:57)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:52)     Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:50)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:43)       Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:35)         Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)         Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:29)           Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:22)           Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:19)             Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:12)               Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:11)               Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:05)                 Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:03)                 Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:59)                   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:55)                   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:52)                     Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:50) Well that was fun Joe 100% FAIL  on math and reading PLUS the designer is some dude call Spetner. Yes, Davey, we already know that you are an ignorant asshole who couldn't follow along if its life depended on it. And you are a LIAR. What math did I fail, Davey? What reading did I fail, Davey? Where did I say that Spetner was the designer, Davey? Please be specific, show your work or admit that you are just another pathetic evoTARD. 10 meters wavelength Joe 100% fail Again you prove that you are a dishonest freak. Is your dishonesty supposed to mean something? Mr toaster repair man lose his calculator? http://www.dxing.com/frequen....enc.htm                 Quote There are different ways to indicate where to find a certain station on a radio dial. For example, we could say that a station is operating on 9680 kiloHertz (kHz), 9.68 megahertz (MHz), or on 31 meters. And all three ways would be correct! Wow, that agrees with what I said! OK so what you meant to say was an Electromagnetic Wave with a speed of 300,000,000 kilometers per hour in free space. What is the frequency of that same wave in coaxial cable with a velocity factor of 0.7? Hint it's different. Your desperation is still showing. Do you understand English or not? What everyone else except you get Joe is that frequency of a wave is dependent on more than length. It is dependent on speed and the permeability of the transmission medium as well as the wavelength. And seriously using a cherry picked quote from some piss ant lay website when Wiki has the full story. All class Joe. Davey, go fuck yourself. I know what the frequency is depended on. That is why I made my SPECIFIC claim. Lamda = Speed / Frequency its on wikipedia Joe except I didn't have to look it up. You know what lamda is right Joe? Maybe you should get someone to read it to you one day what with your dyslexia. Yes, davey, we know all of that. Again that is why I made a specific claim- a claim that you are desperately trying to change. 1/T works The claim was FALSE you made an assumption. Lambda = speed x 1 second. Where do you think the 1/T came from Moron. 1/T works, moron, regardless of the medium. My claim still holds- if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency. They are two different numerical representations of the SAME wave I see where the problem is here. In physics there is a difference in meaning between 1/T and 1/t. No Joe the speed of a wave is dependent on permeability of the medium the wavelength changes inmedium and the frequency remains constant wrt a vacuum. Basic stuff mr toaster repair man You are still not saying anything we didn't already know. 1/T still works, moron. False Joe your 1/t is one second you don't kneed to write 1/t (T is Temp but you knew that Joe RIGHT?) Hey Joes toothless cousins give Joe a clap for being a cunt. No, davey, it is T as in 1/T for the frequency. Joe take some night classes you might learn something. You should be able to fit it in between car stealing and ICE cooking. You need the classes, moron. I provided a reference that supports my claim That reference refers to the 31 meter short wave band which covers several Megahertz it is not the actual wavelength. True but it shows we can interchange them- wavelength and frequency and still be talking about the SAME wave. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:20    Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,12:19) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,20:02) Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:59)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:55)   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:51)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:44)       Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:40)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)         Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:30)         Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:24)           Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:23)           Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:21)             Quote (JohnW @ June 24 2015,11:13)             Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,08:08) If probability is defined as something that has a chance, AND impossible means that there isn't a chance, how can something impossible have a probability? Do tell. As the rest of us don't define probability as "something that has a chance", caekboy, this is a question that can only be answered by the world's leadingonly authority on Joemath, i.e. you. Maybe you should go talk to Gary Gaulin, Joe.  He has a making-shit-up personal version of science.  You have a making-shit-up personal version of mathematics.  Looks like a fit. Well Johnny, I found a reference that defines it that way. So you lose, asshole Joe found a reference that agreed with his FAIL. Classic. Fuck you, asshole. We have noticed that not one of you have provided any references Who's we Joe? Your toothless cousins looking over your shoulders? Well davey, if we ever meet you will become toothless in very little time. Where are you working now Joe since you got sacked for making threats from a work computer. Why a janitor needs to use a computer I don't know. Order more drain freshners? I'll bet they thank God everyday for you not being there Davey, this isn't a threat, it's a promise. And no court would ever entertain your claim of a threat as you are being an asshole and deserve what you get. Did you get another job Joe? What do you put on your CV? Sacked for being a cunt? Yes, I got a job fucking your mother while your father watched. She already told me she said you were done after 2 strokes. I stopped after two because she was such a dried up hag I didn't want to get my dick all raw. That's not what she said. She said it was so small she couldn't feel it. She actually passed out from pleasure. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 24 2015,12:26    Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,20:19) Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,12:15) Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,20:02)   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,12:02)   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:59)     Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:57)     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:52)       Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:50)       Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:43)         Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:35)         Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:31)           Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:29)           Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:22)             Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:19)             Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:12)               Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:11)                 Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,19:05)                 Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,11:03)                   Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:59)                   Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:55)                     Quote (Joe G @ June 24 2015,18:52)                     Quote (k.e.. @ June 24 2015,10:50) Well that was fun Joe 100% FAIL  on math and reading PLUS the designer is some dude call Spetner. Yes, Davey, we already know that you are an ignorant asshole who couldn't follow along if its life depended on it. And you are a LIAR. What math did I fail, Davey? What reading did I fail, Davey? Where did I say that Spetner was the designer, Davey? Please be specific, show your work or admit that you are just another pathetic evoTARD. 10 meters wavelength Joe 100% fail Again you prove that you are a dishonest freak. Is your dishonesty supposed to mean something? Mr toaster repair man lose his calculator? http://www.dxing.com/frequen....enc.htm                   Quote There are different ways to indicate where to find a certain station on a radio dial. For example, we could say that a station is operating on 9680 kiloHertz (kHz), 9.68 megahertz (MHz), or on 31 meters. And all three ways would be correct! Wow, that agrees with what I said! OK so what you meant to say was an Electromagnetic Wave with a speed of 300,000,000 kilometers per hour in free space. What is the frequency of that same wave in coaxial cable with a velocity factor of 0.7? Hint it's different. Your desperation is still showing. Do you understand English or not? What everyone else except you get Joe is that frequency of a wave is dependent on more than length. It is dependent on speed and the permeability of the transmission medium as well as the wavelength. And seriously using a cherry picked quote from some piss ant lay website when Wiki has the full story. All class Joe. Davey, go fuck yourself. I know what the frequency is depended on. That is why I made my SPECIFIC claim. Lamda = Speed / Frequency its on wikipedia Joe except I didn't have to look it up. You know what lamda is right Joe? Maybe you should get someone to read it to you one day what with your dyslexia. Yes, davey, we know all of that. Again that is why I made a specific claim- a claim that you are desperately trying to change. 1/T works The claim was FALSE you made an assumption. Lambda = speed x 1 second. Where do you think the 1/T came from Moron. 1/T works, moron, regardless of the medium. My claim still holds- if I have the wavelength I can derive the frequency. They are two different numerical representations of the SAME wave I see where the problem is here. In physics there is a difference in meaning between 1/T and 1/t. No Joe the speed of a wave is dependent on permeability of the medium the wavelength changes inmedium and the frequency remains constant wrt a vacuum. Basic stuff mr toaster repair man You are still not saying anything we didn't already know. 1/T still works, moron. False Joe your 1/t is one second you don't kneed to write 1/t (T is Temp but you knew that Joe RIGHT?) Hey Joes toothless cousins give Joe a clap for being a cunt. No, davey, it is T as in 1/T for the frequency. Joe take some night classes you might learn something. You should be able to fit it in between car stealing and ICE cooking. You need the classes, moron. I provided a reference that supports my claim That reference refers to the 31 meter short wave band which covers several Megahertz it is not the actual wavelength. True but it shows we can interchange them- wavelength and frequency and still be talking about the SAME wave. different dimensions are not interchangable -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Pages: (919) < ... 304 305 306 307 308 [309] 310 311 312 313 314 ... >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard