k.e..
Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007
|
| Quote (CeilingCat @ June 06 2012,11:37) | | Quote (NormOlsen @ June 04 2012,14:46) |
Good lord, the verbiage, it just never ends. I think Niwrad's been drinking the KF cool aid; all he needed was a few ugly flow charts and it would have been a full blown GEM. And then Barry quips "Geat post!!" like he actually read the damn thing. |
From the text:
| Quote | First off, some principles and definitions.
Principle 01: Nothing comes from nothing or “ex nihilo nihil”.
Principle 02: “Of causality”,
Definition 01: “Symbol”,
Definition 02: “Symbolic processing”
Definition 03: “Language”,
Definition 04: “Instruction”
Definition 05: Turing Machine ™
Definition 06: “Physical computer”
Principle 03: Formalism > Physicality (F > P)
Definition 07: “Primordial soup”
Definition 08: “Constructor”
Definition 09: “GRC” (genome / ribosome / genomic code)
Thesis 01: From a primordial soup of disorganized atoms as input a cybernetic constructor as output cannot spontaneously arise.
Obiection 01: “The constructor formalism in output doesn’t exist.
Answer 01: This objection is a negation of the F > P principle.
Obiection 02: “Given enough time a computer implementing a random generator of characters can
Answer 02: Such static pseudo-symbols are not a functioning formalism.
Obiection 03: “The genetic code in a GRC constructor
Answer 03: This process in no way
As Don Johnson says
Obiection 04: “The natural laws can calculate
Answer 04: No. This doesn’t suffice
Obiection 05: “In your apple analogy C&N could
Answer 05: I state that C&N doesn’t
Thesis 01 has an important and direct application in the biological field about abiogenesis for the following:
Corollary 01: Given that any biological cell contains GRCs,
References
[1] Michael Behe, “Darwin’s Black Box”, 2003.
[2] David Abel, “The First Gene”, 2011.
My favorite:
[7] Michael Polany, http://www.iscid.org/encyclo....Polanyi
|
A question for .rD .rD niwraD: What did the first living thing look like? What did it do?
If you can't answer that, then you suffer from Dembski's Syndrome: an inability to make your reasoning conform to the world because you have no idea of what the world is like. |
Strangely no chapters about Dr. Th.D Dembski's areas of special interest
Farts, why judges who get on the cover of Time mag deserve them
Street theatre, sinking to your pathetic levels of detail.
The Baylor cafe, banninations from the eating halls of academia.
Authors advances,how to get one from a prominent Catholic apologetics outfit and not deliver.
Betting, how to welsh on a Single Malt.
Court witness, how to ensure you are not called (ask for hundreds of dollars per day or provide the plaintiffs with a large target).
Modern medicine, try faith healing instead.
Peer reviews, go straight to pulp fiction.
The Infinite Zero Energy Wave, the Gospel of John re-explained.
The New Logos of Apologetics, post modernism meets binary logic. Yes or no? No answer is the correct answer.
Sunday Schools, for fun and profit.
Is all that stuff in another DI publication?
--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin
|
