Acartia_Bogart
Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014
|
| Quote (OgreMkV @ June 13 2015,21:30) | | Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ June 13 2015,21:05) | | Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 13 2015,19:12) | | Quote (Glen Davidson @ June 12 2015,13:00) | | Quote (J-Dog @ June 12 2015,12:45) | | Quote (CeilingCat @ June 12 2015,11:05) | | Quote (stevestory @ June 12 2015,10:32) | | |
That OP is worth printing out in full: | Quote | | A commenterrecently reminded meof one of the many fundamental fallacies of evolutionary thought. When I point out problems with evolution, and make arguments against evolutionary thought, it is not because I am against the idea or want it to be false. Life would be much easier if the evidence simply supported evolution, if evolutionary thought was a stellar example of intellectual progress, if—to put it simply—evolution was an undeniable scientific fact, just as evolutionists insist. But it’s not. Evolution is not any of those. Evolution is not supported by the empirical evidence, it is not a rational, intellectual movement, and it is not a scientific fact, undeniable or otherwise. I’m not grinding a personal ax here, I’m simply pointing out the obvious. It makes no difference to me if evolution is true, false, or somewhere in between. But it does make a difference when we lie to ourselves. |
Remember that, you Godless bastards. It makes no difference to Corny whether evolution is true or false, he just hates lies. |
Corny hates lying? But I guess Corny's old Thalycines = Wolves Lie is OK Because Lying For Jesus™ is ok? |
How do you know he's not just that appallingly stupid?
Glen Davidson |
Corny is just as lying and dishonest as the rest of the DI's crack anti-evolution team but he's just not very bright. He sticks his foot in his mouth with surprising regularity.
He generally is much less prone to censorship that UD but that changed over the last year too. He's banned a few posters and deleted some posts with embarrassing questions he can't answer. Even on his new "Miracles kill evolution" thread he's accused a pro-science poster of trolling and threatened to ban him. |
That OP and its thread weren't a complete waste of time. I got Joe talking about his claim that wavelength = frequency again. It is always entertaining. But I will give him credit. He came up with a new angle.
His initial response was that if he has the wavelength he would know the frequency. So I gave him a wavelength of ten meters and asked for frequency. His response was that HE still didn't have the wavelength, I did. |
under his sock ID?
That boy is not the brightest crayon in the 8 pack. |
No, it was at Hunter's site, where he still has posting privileges.
|
I wish someone had told me that back in grad school and before 30 years' of professional scientific work. 