RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (527) < ... 133 134 135 136 137 [138] 139 140 141 142 143 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 5, Return To Teh Dingbat Buffet< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 10 2015,12:04   

You have to admit a fishing reel is a mechanism.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 10 2015,12:21   

Quote
Following up Bostrom’s argument from simulation of universes . . .
August 8, 2015 Posted by kairosfocus under Darwinist rhetorical tactics, evolutionary materialism's self-falsification, Extraterrestrial life, Fine tuning, Functionally Specified Complex Information & Organization, ID Foundations, Probability, Science, worldview issues/foundations and society, thermodynamics and information
13 Comments
That is, why inferring design on functionally specific, complex organisation and associated information, e.g.:



and equally:



. . . makes good sense.


man, he has a point...i'm squinting, and i can barely detect the differences between the first thing and the second thing...

   
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 10 2015,14:38   

Quote (midwifetoad @ Aug. 10 2015,11:04)
You have to admit a fishing reel is a mechanism.

Not only that, but it's also reel-science!

  
sparc



Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 10 2015,14:49   

Do you think he would stop writing if we send him an ambassadeur 6500 c3 as a gift? There should be some fish around Montserrat.

--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
Glen Davidson



Posts: 1100
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 10 2015,14:52   

Quote (midwifetoad @ Aug. 10 2015,12:04)
You have to admit a fishing reel is a mechanism.

Would Lewontin?

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 10 2015,14:54   

Quote (sparc @ Aug. 10 2015,14:49)
Do you think he would stop writing if we send him an ambassadeur 6500 c3 as a gift? There should be some fish around Montserrat.

Given his paranoid delusions, he would probably call in the bomb squad. Especially if we addressed it from The Whole Truth.

  
Glen Davidson



Posts: 1100
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 10 2015,15:14   

Quote (stevestory @ Aug. 10 2015,12:21)
Quote
Following up Bostrom’s argument from simulation of universes . . .
August 8, 2015 Posted by kairosfocus under Darwinist rhetorical tactics, evolutionary materialism's self-falsification, Extraterrestrial life, Fine tuning, Functionally Specified Complex Information & Organization, ID Foundations, Probability, Science, worldview issues/foundations and society, thermodynamics and information
13 Comments
That is, why inferring design on functionally specific, complex organisation and associated information, e.g.:



and equally:



. . . makes good sense.


man, he has a point...i'm squinting, and i can barely detect the differences between the first thing and the second thing...

Well, quite, and the fact that reel parts are modified rollerblade parts, which in turn are modified mousetrap parts, we can see that designed objects are every bit as derived as life is, ergo...

I can see no flaw in his analogy.

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 10 2015,18:34   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Aug. 10 2015,15:54)
Quote (sparc @ Aug. 10 2015,14:49)
Do you think he would stop writing if we send him an ambassadeur 6500 c3 as a gift? There should be some fish around Montserrat.

Given his paranoid delusions, he would probably call in the bomb squad. Especially if we addressed it from The Whole Truth.

under those circumstances I'D call in the bomb squad.

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 10 2015,18:37   

the eloquence is lincolnesque:



Quote
Nature Cannot Account for Nature. Duh.

August 10, 2015

Posted by Barry Arrington under Intelligent Design


linky

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 10 2015,18:52   

Quote
Kirk Durston writes:

Quote
[S]cience reveals that nature, composed of space, time, matter, and energy, had a beginning. Scientism requires a natural explanation for the origin of nature, a logical impossibility. One cannot provide a natural explanation for the origin of nature without assuming the existence of nature in that “natural” explanation — a circular fallacy.


Yet another way materialism makes people stupid.  It requires them to say there is a natural explanation for nature itself.


dumb word games.

   
Tony M Nyphot



Posts: 491
Joined: June 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 10 2015,21:03   

[quote=stevestory,Aug. 10 2015,17:37]  
Quote
Nature Cannot Account for Nature. Duh.

Without the BA byline, how many would have surmised JoeG Virgil Cain finally was allowed posting privileges?

--------------
"I, OTOH, am an underachiever...I either pee my pants or faint dead away..." FTK

"You could always wrap fresh fish in the paper you publish it on, though, and sell that." - Field Man on how to find value in Gary Gaulin's real-science "theory"

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 10 2015,22:49   

Who would have thought that you could get Gordon (Kairosfocus) Mullings to write an OP in response to one of your comments was to call the term "scientism" bogus.

He who shall not be named

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 11 2015,10:44   

your grammar is showing signs of Gaulinitis  :p

   
sparc



Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 11 2015,11:10   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Aug. 10 2015,22:49)
Who would have thought that you could get Gordon (Kairosfocus) Mullings to write an OP in response to one of your comments was to call the term "scientism" bogus.

He who shall not be named

Lewontin!

--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 11 2015,11:13   

Quote (stevestory @ Aug. 11 2015,10:44)
your grammar is showing signs of Gaulinitis  :p

I thought that it was more Beyersesque.

  
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 11 2015,15:21   

I won't ask you to guess the author, as it's blindingly obvious.

Shockingly, he hasn't got around to explaining why "meaning of life via divine fiat" is smarter than "finding one's own meaning," even in the absence of belief in gods.  I'm sure he'll be correcting this oversight.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 11 2015,16:26   

Meaning of life? That's 42.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 11 2015,16:38   

Quote (JohnW @ Aug. 11 2015,15:21)
I won't ask you to guess the author, as it's blindingly obvious.

Shockingly, he hasn't got around to explaining why "meaning of life via divine fiat" is smarter than "finding one's own meaning," even in the absence of belief in gods.  I'm sure he'll be correcting this oversight.

Barry's bitterness is unbound. He has all these objective standards... he doesn't come close to.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 11 2015,17:02   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 11 2015,16:38)
Quote (JohnW @ Aug. 11 2015,15:21)
I won't ask you to guess the author, as it's blindingly obvious.

Shockingly, he hasn't got around to explaining why "meaning of life via divine fiat" is smarter than "finding one's own meaning," even in the absence of belief in gods.  I'm sure he'll be correcting this oversight.

Barry's bitterness is unbound. He has all these objective standards... he doesn't come close to.

Barry has been keeping a low profile. And a low number of ID opponents.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 11 2015,17:17   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Aug. 11 2015,17:02)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 11 2015,16:38)
Quote (JohnW @ Aug. 11 2015,15:21)
I won't ask you to guess the author, as it's blindingly obvious.

Shockingly, he hasn't got around to explaining why "meaning of life via divine fiat" is smarter than "finding one's own meaning," even in the absence of belief in gods.  I'm sure he'll be correcting this oversight.

Barry's bitterness is unbound. He has all these objective standards... he doesn't come close to.

Barry has been keeping a low profile. And a low number of ID opponents.

D grade lawyer (BBB, last time I looked) running "just another science free bad apologetics blog".

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 11 2015,17:36   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 11 2015,17:17)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Aug. 11 2015,17:02)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 11 2015,16:38)
 
Quote (JohnW @ Aug. 11 2015,15:21)
I won't ask you to guess the author, as it's blindingly obvious.

Shockingly, he hasn't got around to explaining why "meaning of life via divine fiat" is smarter than "finding one's own meaning," even in the absence of belief in gods.  I'm sure he'll be correcting this oversight.

Barry's bitterness is unbound. He has all these objective standards... he doesn't come close to.

Barry has been keeping a low profile. And a low number of ID opponents.

D grade lawyer (BBB, last time I looked) running "just another science free bad apologetics blog".

But he was quick to ban Tininnid. Again.

  
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 12 2015,10:31   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 11 2015,14:38)
Quote (JohnW @ Aug. 11 2015,15:21)
I won't ask you to guess the author, as it's blindingly obvious.

Shockingly, he hasn't got around to explaining why "meaning of life via divine fiat" is smarter than "finding one's own meaning," even in the absence of belief in gods.  I'm sure he'll be correcting this oversight.

Barry's bitterness is unbound. He has all these objective standards... he doesn't come close to.

All the IDist comments (at least, the non-poo-flinging ones) are variants of "I wouldn't like it if god didn't exist.  Therefore god exists."  High-grade logic.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Starbuck



Posts: 26
Joined: July 2011

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 12 2015,11:55   

Forgive me but I sometimes see LEWONTIN! and was wondering if someone can explain the background on that?

  
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 12 2015,12:17   

Quote (Starbuck @ Aug. 12 2015,09:55)
Forgive me but I sometimes see LEWONTIN! and was wondering if someone can explain the background on that?

Every few days, regardless of the purported topic, He Who Must Not Be Named And Who Keeps Linking To Stuff Written By Gordon E Mullings Who Is No Relation quotes a Richard Lewontin review of a Carl Sagan book.  Lewontin makes the entirely uncontroversial statement that if we allow the possibility of arbitrary supernatural interference, we cannot do science, since we can't rule out the possibility of divine mucking about.  HWMNBNAWKLTSWBGEMWINR regards this as an admission that scientists are anti-religion.  There must be hundreds of these on UD by now, and some of us look out for new additions to the panoply.  See also: Plato; fishing reel; is and ought.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 12 2015,14:02   

captured in case of "server hiccup":

Quote
20
eigenstateAugust 12, 2015 at 12:53 pm
@Barry,

I will boil eigenstate’s lengthy comment down for a readers:

There really is no essential difference between what Hitler did and what Mother Teresa did. For our own idiosyncratic reasons we just happen to value one and not the other because for pragmatic reasons we think one “works” and the other does not. And just like the value of gold rises and falls, if we decide to reassess our judgment of value, our reassessed judgment will be just as valid as our prior judgment.


This doesn’t reflect my comments at all. The psychology of meaning (and similarly our psychology of value) is not idiosyncratic, or to whatever extent it is irrelevant to the point being made. It’s subjective, which is just to say, “human”.

The price of gold rises and falls based on the market dynamics for it, the “combined psychology” concerning it. It doesn’t just go up and don’t arbitrarily, but functions as a rough index of the equilibrium of supply and demand.

Similarly, our understanding of self, others, and the relationship and values between all parties is subjective, but not arbitrary or random. It’s based on evolved human nature (and objective set of facts that forms and informs the basis for our subjective psychology), and our experiences/interactions with other and the world around us. It’s a subjective position, like value of money, grounded in, and inextricably tied to our nature, and the environment we live in.

Yes, eigenstate, that is exactly correct on materialist premises. The fact that your logic leads to horror and despair should at least give you pause (though I doubt it will). It may really be the case that horror and despair is the appropriate response to a meaningless universe. That is certainly the case if God does not exist. I’m betting you are wrong.

I was raised a Christian, unfortunately. So I know the burden you are laboring under. I also understand the “horror-based reaction” you are advocating here, because of that.

The consequences don’t change the truth of the facts, Barry. if there is no “cosmic meaning”for you or me, as I can well understand from the the narcissism that passes for evangelical Christianity (“so humbled to be a Christian — God has a perfect plan for me, and has counted every hair on my head, and has prepared a mansion for me to convalesce in for eternity!”) I grew up in, it definitely require some growing up, and that is difficult indeed.

There is no “cosmic justice” coming for Hitler, or Mother Teresa (not anywhere near such an execrable figure, but not someone to elevate as an admirable human in my view, btw). Martin Luther King, Jr. doesn’t get to “walk the streets of gold”, either, as some kind of compensation(???) for being murdered in what should have been the middle of his life.

That’s the real world, Barry. Wake up. It has lots of features that aren’t comfortable or happy or easily reconcilable with our tender psychology. But fantasizing about your cosmic value, you as the “real objective gold” of all the universe doesn’t make it so.

Even if God does exist, your whole point is wrong: meaning is just as subjective even and especially if God is real. Your “meaning” is then, idiosyncratic in the most thoroughgoing sense of the word. Why does God choosing that your life has meaning give it any objective meaning? It can’t by definition. It’s just meaning imputed to you by another mind, and act of will.

That’s another subject, but even on your own understanding, your point is confused and incorrect, once again.


--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 12 2015,14:12   

Quote
Why there is no Meaning if Materialism is True
August 12, 2015 Posted by Barry Arrington under Intelligent Design

[snip]

(Visited 133 times, 134 visits today)


Say what now?

it's been visited 133 times total, 134 of which were today?

linky

Edited by stevestory on Aug. 12 2015,15:17

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 12 2015,14:14   

Quote (JohnW @ Aug. 12 2015,12:17)
 HWMNBNAWKLTSWBGEMWINR

And thus a new term came to pass.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 12 2015,14:17   

Quote (stevestory @ Aug. 12 2015,12:12)
Quote
Why there is no Meaning if Materialism is True
August 12, 2015 Posted by Barry Arrington under Intelligent Design

[snip]

(Visited 133 times, 134 visits today)


Say what now?

it's been visited 133 time total, 134 of which were today?

linky

That was god, moving in mysterious ways.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 12 2015,15:21   

I'd say UD is an off by one error, at least.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 12 2015,15:51   

Barry in fighting retreat:

Quote
...Then he says the same thing that I summarized in different words.

Conversation over. Eigenstate, you lie and dissemble. I knew that already and I don’t know what possessed me to attempt to engage with you, the triumph of hope over experience I guess.


He is so unlikeable.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
  15792 replies since Dec. 29 2013,11:01 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (527) < ... 133 134 135 136 137 [138] 139 140 141 142 143 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]