ericmurphy
Posts: 2460 Joined: Oct. 2005
|
Quote (The Ghost of Paley @ Sep. 18 2006,19:10) | Kidding aside, I see your point. The Mayan and Khmer Empires were both great. So were the Aztecs, Incans, Egyptians, Greeks, as well as many others. Nonetheless, none of these civilisations ever reached the height of European Judeo-Christian culture, and I think religion explains much of the difference. |
Actually, that was me.
But which is the real reason these other civilizations never reached the heights (if that's the proper term) of Judeo-Christian culture? Is it because there's something inherently pro-civilization about Judaism and/or Christianity (seems doubtful) or is because they peaked earlier in time than European culture?
If you could teleport back to, say, the 14th century, and could get a global perspective on the civilizations in existence at the time, I doubt you'd have any reason to single out Europe as any kind of future center of civilization or culture. You'd probably see China as the dominant culture on the planet. Central America probably would have looked pretty promising too.
So—what is it do you suppose it is about Christianity that made it an engine of civilization, culture, and technology—but only after 1,000 years or so? The first 1,000 years Europe spent under Christianity were pretty grim.
You say you think it's religion that's the difference: but what about religion? Kung Fu Tzu-ism did the Chinese pretty well for a lot longer than Christianity has even existed…
-------------- 2006 MVD award for most dogged defense of scientific sanity
"Atheism is a religion the same way NOT collecting stamps is a hobby." —Scott Adams
|