Joined: July 2007
|Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Mar. 11 2010,10:16)|
|Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 11 2010,10:11)|
My "proof"= nothing in peer-review.
What have you read? Given that it's not possible for a single person to keep up with the complete volume of scientific output I have to wonder on what basis you make this claim.
Do you have a team of ID researchers in your basement scouring every journal? Every paper that comes out?
|There isn't any data which demonstrates mutations can accumulate in such a way as to give rise to new protein machinery, new body parts and new body plans.|
Therefore ID? Even if that were true, how exactly does it help you? Even if it were true, what support does that give ID?
None whatsoever, that's how much.
Ever thought about providing some evidence for *your* position? Knock "Darwinism" as much as you like, it won't help ID one single bit.
So, about that debate. Proved you've even got $10,000 yet? Or still making that empty claim just to avoid having to put up or shut up?
Hey asshole- If I am wrong then please present the data which demonstrates that.
I have provided plenty of evidence for ID on my blog.
Why can't you grow some balls and leave your protectorate and actually engage the evidence?
"Genetic mutations are mistakes"- evolutionary biologists
"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton
Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code- Acartia bogart, TARD
YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism