RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (21) < 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... >   
  Topic: Challenge to Evolutionists< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:08   

Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:07)
Quote (IanBrown_101 @ Sep. 18 2007,09:04)
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,15:00)
I can also show you fossilized humans were found in the same area as fossilized dinosaurs.

Same area, no doubt. Same layer? All over the world? I doubt that.

all over the world?  It just takes one spot, right?

Bring it on.

In the same vein, if we can show one prediction that the bible makes is 100% wrong, that proves the bible is not true?

It just takes one contradiction right?

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
k.e



Posts: 1948
Joined: Mar. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:10   

Quote
"No one can read these legends and doubt that the Flood was an historical reality


Careful child, quoting stories from the imagined history of a post literal world makes your argument look like argumentum ex Hollywood in terms of the history of the Earth. 2500 years ago when Genesis was written compared to the birth of film 100 years ago is an order of magnitude of 10 to the power of 6 compared with the total age of the earth.  

In other words irrelavant.

You not only couldn't pay attention in class you were incapable, isn’t that right sStuporSorter?

--------------
The conservative has but little to fear from the man whose reason is the servant of his passions, but let him beware of him in whom reason has become the greatest and most terrible of the passions.These are the wreckers of outworn empires and civilisations, doubters, disintegrators, deicides.Haldane

   
IanBrown_101



Posts: 927
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:10   

Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,15:07)
Quote (IanBrown_101 @ Sep. 18 2007,09:04)
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,15:00)
I can also show you fossilized humans were found in the same area as fossilized dinosaurs.

Same area, no doubt. Same layer? All over the world? I doubt that.

all over the world?  It just takes one spot, right?

If it was something as bizzare as rabbits in clearly pre-cambrian rock, then yeah.

If it's fossil humans and fossil dino's in one area where there's been a lot of geographical turbulence, not so much.

--------------
I'm not the fastest or the baddest or the fatest.

You NEVER seem to address the fact that the grand majority of people supporting Darwinism in these on line forums and blogs are atheists. That doesn't seem to bother you guys in the least. - FtK

Roddenberry is my God.

   
supersport



Posts: 158
Joined: Aug. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:12   

Quote (IanBrown_101 @ Sep. 18 2007,09:10)
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,15:07)
Quote (IanBrown_101 @ Sep. 18 2007,09:04)
 
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,15:00)
I can also show you fossilized humans were found in the same area as fossilized dinosaurs.

Same area, no doubt. Same layer? All over the world? I doubt that.

all over the world?  It just takes one spot, right?

If it was something as bizzare as rabbits in clearly pre-cambrian rock, then yeah.

If it's fossil humans and fossil dino's in one area where there's been a lot of geographical turbulence, not so much.

there's been geologic turbulence everywhere.

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:12   

Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:08)
 
Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Sep. 18 2007,09:06)
 
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:00)
I can also show you fossilized humans were found in the same area as fossilized dinosaurs.

Same area? Same Strata?

Whatever, please bring on the information, links, whatever.

So, just so we're clear Supersport, it's your contention that humans and Dinosaurs existed at the same time in the same places?

http://www.projectexploration.org/niger2000/11_04_2000.htm

"“There’s something big over here!” shouted Allison. We gathered around her find, a blackened, fossilized skull fragment more than a foot across. After puzzling over the piece briefly, I declared “It’s a cow, a fossilized cow skull.”

Now what was a fossil cow skull doing in a place like this – an area rich in dinosaur bone more than 100 million years old?


T ime-blackened fossil remains of rhinos, goats, and crocodiles recovered from a floodplain sit on the hood of the Land Rover alongside stone tools and remains of fossilized humans.

More pieces of the puzzle were being picked up by other team members. Dave exclaimed gleefully, “Look, it’s human! Part of the skull!” as he held high the curved plate of bone that shields the massive human brain. He never expected to find fossil humans on a dinosaur expedition."

You should have turned to the next page SuperSport. It's all explained
 
Quote
Dinosaurs and humans did not live at the same time. The last of the dinosaurs died out 60 million years before the first modern human ever walked the earth. Paleontologists study ancient life forms, including dinosaurs. Archaeologists, on the other hand, study evidence of ancient humans. While the formal study of these subjects are different, the concurrence of “recent fossils” with dinosaur fossils is not uncommon. Archaeologists have even found tools and jewlery carved out of dinosaur bones.


Your "proof" Supersport comes from a non-scientific field trip out to collect bones. Does this sound like a professional expedition?
 
Quote
Soon a pile of bone lay on the hood of one of the Land Rovers. “Put all fossil human pieces here, fish go there. Put non-human mammal finds here.”


Yet again SuperSport, you use an article that flatly contradicts the assertions you are making. You said this article supports your contention that man and dino lived at the same time. Even the article says that that's not true.

Wake up man! If this is the best you've got then give up now.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
jeannot



Posts: 1201
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:13   

Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:06)
Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,09:04)
 
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:00)
hey, old man...if dinosaurs are 100 million years old, why are their bones found on the surface of the ground?....what's up with that?

You've heard about "erosion", right?

right....so how does encased rock get eroded off bones so that the bones are free and clear of it?  It takes scientists special tools, instruments and chemicals to get rock off bones.....yet you say rain can do it.  Go figure.   You can't count evidence that you can't see.  I see bones laying on the surface......you have no scientific explanation.

I find amusing that you want a scientific explanation, while you favor Goddidit over scientific facts.
So just to be clear, you also refute all geology?

Is it part of the big conspiracy?

:O

  
supersport



Posts: 158
Joined: Aug. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:14   

old man -- that's not an explanation -- that's a belief -- the reality is these bones were found together.  The observable evidence is on my side.

  
supersport



Posts: 158
Joined: Aug. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:15   

Old Man: "Yet again SuperSport, you use an article that flatly contradicts the assertions you are making. You said this article supports your contention that man and dino lived at the same time. Even the article says that that's not true"

No, reread what I actually did say....I said fossilized human and fossilized dino bones have been found in the same area.

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:15   

Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:12)
Quote (IanBrown_101 @ Sep. 18 2007,09:10)
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,15:07)
 
Quote (IanBrown_101 @ Sep. 18 2007,09:04)
 
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,15:00)
I can also show you fossilized humans were found in the same area as fossilized dinosaurs.

Same area, no doubt. Same layer? All over the world? I doubt that.

all over the world?  It just takes one spot, right?

If it was something as bizzare as rabbits in clearly pre-cambrian rock, then yeah.

If it's fossil humans and fossil dino's in one area where there's been a lot of geographical turbulence, not so much.

there's been geologic turbulence everywhere.

except that you cannot point to the flood layer in the geologic record that should exist world-wide according to you. Or did this flood happen without disturbing a single pebble?

It's funny how this "turbulence" only affects that one strata.

What a co-incidence.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
IanBrown_101



Posts: 927
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:16   

Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,15:12)
Quote (IanBrown_101 @ Sep. 18 2007,09:10)
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,15:07)
 
Quote (IanBrown_101 @ Sep. 18 2007,09:04)
 
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,15:00)
I can also show you fossilized humans were found in the same area as fossilized dinosaurs.

Same area, no doubt. Same layer? All over the world? I doubt that.

all over the world?  It just takes one spot, right?

If it was something as bizzare as rabbits in clearly pre-cambrian rock, then yeah.

If it's fossil humans and fossil dino's in one area where there's been a lot of geographical turbulence, not so much.

there's been geologic turbulence everywhere.

On a minor scale, yeah.

Unless you're talking about the flood? Please tell me how the water got there without boiling all life.

Then tell me how big the ark was, and what animals were on it.

--------------
I'm not the fastest or the baddest or the fatest.

You NEVER seem to address the fact that the grand majority of people supporting Darwinism in these on line forums and blogs are atheists. That doesn't seem to bother you guys in the least. - FtK

Roddenberry is my God.

   
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:16   

Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:15)
Old Man: "Yet again SuperSport, you use an article that flatly contradicts the assertions you are making. You said this article supports your contention that man and dino lived at the same time. Even the article says that that's not true"

No, reread what I actually did say....I said fossilized human and fossilized dino bones have been found in the same area.

Yes, a museum also contains fossil human and Dino bones.

You can say of these also that they were "found in the same area".

So what?

What does "finding them in the same area" prove then? That man lived with Dino? Is that what you are saying?

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
supersport



Posts: 158
Joined: Aug. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:17   

Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,09:13)
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:06)
 
Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,09:04)
 
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:00)
hey, old man...if dinosaurs are 100 million years old, why are their bones found on the surface of the ground?....what's up with that?

You've heard about "erosion", right?

right....so how does encased rock get eroded off bones so that the bones are free and clear of it?  It takes scientists special tools, instruments and chemicals to get rock off bones.....yet you say rain can do it.  Go figure.   You can't count evidence that you can't see.  I see bones laying on the surface......you have no scientific explanation.

I find amusing that you want a scientific explanation, while you favor Goddidit over scientific facts.
So just to be clear, you also refute all geology?

Is it part of the big conspiracy?

:O

I just don't trust atheists as far as I can throw them.  They'll only "find" evidence that they can manipulate to further their worldview....all the contradictory evidence gets lied about, hidden, or left in the ground.

Geologists are no different than atheists in other areas of science.

  
supersport



Posts: 158
Joined: Aug. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:18   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Sep. 18 2007,09:16)
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:15)
Old Man: "Yet again SuperSport, you use an article that flatly contradicts the assertions you are making. You said this article supports your contention that man and dino lived at the same time. Even the article says that that's not true"

No, reread what I actually did say....I said fossilized human and fossilized dino bones have been found in the same area.

Yes, a museum also contains fossil human and Dino bones.

You can say of these also that they were "found in the same area".

So what?

What does "finding them in the same area" prove then? That man lived with Dino? Is that what you are saying?

I'm saying the fact that humans and dinos are found in the same rock, the same strata, and the fact that dinos have soft, organic tissue embedded in their bones proves that they did not, could not have died out millions of years ago.

  
IanBrown_101



Posts: 927
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:19   

Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,15:17)
Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,09:13)
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:06)
 
Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,09:04)
   
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:00)
hey, old man...if dinosaurs are 100 million years old, why are their bones found on the surface of the ground?....what's up with that?

You've heard about "erosion", right?

right....so how does encased rock get eroded off bones so that the bones are free and clear of it?  It takes scientists special tools, instruments and chemicals to get rock off bones.....yet you say rain can do it.  Go figure.   You can't count evidence that you can't see.  I see bones laying on the surface......you have no scientific explanation.

I find amusing that you want a scientific explanation, while you favor Goddidit over scientific facts.
So just to be clear, you also refute all geology?

Is it part of the big conspiracy?

:O

I just don't trust atheists as far as I can throw them.  They'll only "find" evidence that they can manipulate to further their worldview....all the contradictory evidence gets lied about, hidden, or left in the ground.

Geologists are no different than atheists in other areas of science.

1. Why don't you trust atheists? What evidence made you think they are liars?

2. What about the religious scientists who accept evolution, such as Wes?

--------------
I'm not the fastest or the baddest or the fatest.

You NEVER seem to address the fact that the grand majority of people supporting Darwinism in these on line forums and blogs are atheists. That doesn't seem to bother you guys in the least. - FtK

Roddenberry is my God.

   
jeannot



Posts: 1201
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:20   

Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:17)
Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,09:13)
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:06)
 
Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,09:04)
   
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:00)
hey, old man...if dinosaurs are 100 million years old, why are their bones found on the surface of the ground?....what's up with that?

You've heard about "erosion", right?

right....so how does encased rock get eroded off bones so that the bones are free and clear of it?  It takes scientists special tools, instruments and chemicals to get rock off bones.....yet you say rain can do it.  Go figure.   You can't count evidence that you can't see.  I see bones laying on the surface......you have no scientific explanation.

I find amusing that you want a scientific explanation, while you favor Goddidit over scientific facts.
So just to be clear, you also refute all geology?

Is it part of the big conspiracy?

:O

I just don't trust atheists as far as I can throw them.  They'll only "find" evidence that they can manipulate to further their worldview....all the contradictory evidence gets lied about, hidden, or left in the ground.

Geologists are no different than atheists in other areas of science.

How do you know they're lying?

  
k.e



Posts: 1948
Joined: Mar. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:21   

Quote
I just don't trust atheists as far as I can throw them.  They'll only "find" evidence that they can manipulate to further their worldview....all the contradictory evidence gets lied about, hidden, or left in the ground.

Geologists are no different than atheists in other areas of science.



OH BOOHOOHOO friggen' HOO arsehole get on your white (w)horse and ride out of town to the band playing "march of the clowns"!!!

--------------
The conservative has but little to fear from the man whose reason is the servant of his passions, but let him beware of him in whom reason has become the greatest and most terrible of the passions.These are the wreckers of outworn empires and civilisations, doubters, disintegrators, deicides.Haldane

   
supersport



Posts: 158
Joined: Aug. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:21   

Quote (IanBrown_101 @ Sep. 18 2007,09:19)
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,15:17)
 
Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,09:13)
 
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:06)
   
Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,09:04)
     
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:00)
hey, old man...if dinosaurs are 100 million years old, why are their bones found on the surface of the ground?....what's up with that?

You've heard about "erosion", right?

right....so how does encased rock get eroded off bones so that the bones are free and clear of it?  It takes scientists special tools, instruments and chemicals to get rock off bones.....yet you say rain can do it.  Go figure.   You can't count evidence that you can't see.  I see bones laying on the surface......you have no scientific explanation.

I find amusing that you want a scientific explanation, while you favor Goddidit over scientific facts.
So just to be clear, you also refute all geology?

Is it part of the big conspiracy?

:O

I just don't trust atheists as far as I can throw them.  They'll only "find" evidence that they can manipulate to further their worldview....all the contradictory evidence gets lied about, hidden, or left in the ground.

Geologists are no different than atheists in other areas of science.

1. Why don't you trust atheists? What evidence made you think they are liars?

2. What about the religious scientists who accept evolution, such as Wes?

I wouldn't necessarily call all atheists liars, but their problem is they simply cannot see the truth...consequently, untruths and wild guessing get passed over as reality.

  
jeannot



Posts: 1201
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:21   

Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:18)
I'm saying the fact that humans and dinos are found in the same rock, the same strata,...

Where's the paper reporting that?

  
supersport



Posts: 158
Joined: Aug. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:22   

Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,09:21)
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:18)
I'm saying the fact that humans and dinos are found in the same rock, the same strata,...

Where's the paper reporting that?

in the trashcan....

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:22   

Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:17)
Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,09:13)
 
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:06)
   
Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,09:04)
   
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:00)
hey, old man...if dinosaurs are 100 million years old, why are their bones found on the surface of the ground?....what's up with that?

You've heard about "erosion", right?

right....so how does encased rock get eroded off bones so that the bones are free and clear of it?  It takes scientists special tools, instruments and chemicals to get rock off bones.....yet you say rain can do it.  Go figure.   You can't count evidence that you can't see.  I see bones laying on the surface......you have no scientific explanation.

I find amusing that you want a scientific explanation, while you favor Goddidit over scientific facts.
So just to be clear, you also refute all geology?

Is it part of the big conspiracy?

:O

I just don't trust atheists as far as I can throw them.  They'll only "find" evidence that they can manipulate to further their worldview....all the contradictory evidence gets lied about, hidden, or left in the ground.

Geologists are no different than atheists in other areas of science.

Is that why all the early geologists were in fact creationists out to provide proof for a young earth, only to realize that the in fact the evidence shows a old old earth

Do you really want to go here SuperSport? Do you really know that little about the history of all this stuff that you'd want to bring up Geologists?

Do a little research next time to avoid looking this foolish.

You did know this about the YEC Geologists right? How they went looking for proof of a young earth?

So, SuperSport, what to talk about creationist Geologists some more? Or are you embarrassed enough now?

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:23   

Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:22)
Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,09:21)
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:18)
I'm saying the fact that humans and dinos are found in the same rock, the same strata,...

Where's the paper reporting that?

in the trashcan....

ah, you've had a proper look at the site you linked to now huh? Maybe you've realized that "a day trip hunting bones for tourists" is not exactly the sort of scientific evidence that people round here are going to accept?

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
jeannot



Posts: 1201
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:24   

Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,09:20)
How do you know they're lying?

This is a very important question, SS. You should try to answer it.

  
k.e



Posts: 1948
Joined: Mar. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:24   

Quote
I wouldn't necessarily call all atheists liars, but their problem is they simply cannot see the truth...consequently, lies and untruths and wild guessing get passed over as reality.


Oh yeah coming from a guy who has difficulty counting change.......this is EARTH SHATTERING!!!!!

--------------
The conservative has but little to fear from the man whose reason is the servant of his passions, but let him beware of him in whom reason has become the greatest and most terrible of the passions.These are the wreckers of outworn empires and civilisations, doubters, disintegrators, deicides.Haldane

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11172
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:25   

Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,06:52)
Quote (k.e @ Sep. 18 2007,02:30)
Quote
This would make sense from a Biblical perspective. Remember how it was that Adam and Eve walked and talked in the Garden with God? I believe Adam and Eve were probably created perfectly and designed to live forever….it was only after sin entered that they Spiritually began to degenerate...and this process continues today.


Why is it you fundies have such a hangup about sex?

It's like you are trapped permanently in the birth canal.

everyone has hangups with sex....we "fundies" just don't do it with animals and with members of our own gender like others in society.

..until you get caught.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:26   

Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:21)
I wouldn't necessarily call all atheists liars, but their problem is they simply cannot see the truth...consequently, untruths and wild guessing get passed over as reality.

So you believe that there are no theist scientists at all?

If we can prove that there are in fact theist scientists who also believe in evolution and a old earth, how do you you explain the consensus regarding "evilution".

If not all scientists are atheists then you can't explain it that way, as much as you might wish you could.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
supersport



Posts: 158
Joined: Aug. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:26   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Sep. 18 2007,09:23)
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:22)
Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,09:21)
 
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:18)
I'm saying the fact that humans and dinos are found in the same rock, the same strata,...

Where's the paper reporting that?

in the trashcan....

ah, you've had a proper look at the site you linked to now huh? Maybe you've realized that "a day trip hunting bones for tourists" is not exactly the sort of scientific evidence that people round here are going to accept?

the only people who won't accept it are the kooks in science who don't want to accept it.

  
supersport



Posts: 158
Joined: Aug. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:28   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Sep. 18 2007,09:26)
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:21)
I wouldn't necessarily call all atheists liars, but their problem is they simply cannot see the truth...consequently, untruths and wild guessing get passed over as reality.

So you believe that there are no theist scientists at all?

If we can prove that there are in fact theist scientists who also believe in evolution and a old earth, how do you you explain the consensus regarding "evilution".

If not all scientists are atheists then you can't explain it that way, as much as you might wish you could.

oh I have no doubt that there are Christian scientists.....but they are, however, materialists....and materialism often trumps anything and everything.  I think some scientists claim to be Christians on debate forums so they can better fool people (Christians) or lull them into believing that they're getting the truth.

These turkeys don't fool me though.

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:29   

Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:26)
Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Sep. 18 2007,09:23)
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:22)
 
Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,09:21)
 
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,09:18)
I'm saying the fact that humans and dinos are found in the same rock, the same strata,...

Where's the paper reporting that?

in the trashcan....

ah, you've had a proper look at the site you linked to now huh? Maybe you've realized that "a day trip hunting bones for tourists" is not exactly the sort of scientific evidence that people round here are going to accept?

the only people who won't accept it are the kooks in science who don't want to accept it.

If your "proof" is a simple "here's how we did on our day out bone hunting" story, then are you surprised that it's not been accepted?

Provide some evidence for your position and then you can start to call people "kooks".

Degenerating to name-calling now are we Sport?

"kooks"?

Anyway, everybody "in science"  has accepted "it" years ago. Therefore everybody "in science" is a kook.

Put me in with the kooks if you are the alternative.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
supersport



Posts: 158
Joined: Aug. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:29   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Sep. 18 2007,09:25)
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,06:52)
Quote (k.e @ Sep. 18 2007,02:30)
 
Quote
This would make sense from a Biblical perspective. Remember how it was that Adam and Eve walked and talked in the Garden with God? I believe Adam and Eve were probably created perfectly and designed to live forever….it was only after sin entered that they Spiritually began to degenerate...and this process continues today.


Why is it you fundies have such a hangup about sex?

It's like you are trapped permanently in the birth canal.

everyone has hangups with sex....we "fundies" just don't do it with animals and with members of our own gender like others in society.

..until you get caught.

lol...good one.

  
k.e



Posts: 1948
Joined: Mar. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,09:31   

Quote
//the only people who won't accept it are the kooks in science who don't want to accept it.


Ah say .....ah say, boy .......can you you keep the quotable quotes down to one a day you are outgassing AFDAVE there boy!!

--------------
The conservative has but little to fear from the man whose reason is the servant of his passions, but let him beware of him in whom reason has become the greatest and most terrible of the passions.These are the wreckers of outworn empires and civilisations, doubters, disintegrators, deicides.Haldane

   
  603 replies since Sep. 17 2007,22:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (21) < 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]