Joe G
Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007
|
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Jan. 21 2019,13:10) | Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 21 2019,12:53) | Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Jan. 21 2019,12:14) | Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 21 2019,12:00) | Quote | Loci that are obviously variable within natural populations do not seem to lie at the basis of many major adaptive changes, while those loci that seemingly do constitute the foundation of many if not most major adaptive changes are not variable.- John McDonald, “The Molecular Basis of Adaptation: A Critical Review of Relevant Ideas and Observation”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics: 14, 1983, p77-102 |
|
This is from the same review article as Joke's quote-mined hack job:
Quote | "Obviously, however, adaptive evolutionary changes have occurred at all levels of biological organization" John McDonald, “The Molecular Basis of Adaptation: A Critical Review of Relevant Ideas and Observation”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics: 14, 1983, p77-102 |
Joke's own source says there's no evidence of a limit to evolutionary changes between Joke's YEC "kinds". :D :D :D
ETA: Here is article Joke quote-mined (or more precisely, he copied the quote-mine from another YEC webpage). You can download the pdf from the link.
[URL=https://www.researchgate.net/profile/John_Mcdonald27/publication/234150452_The_Molecular_Basis_of_Adaptation_A_Critical_Review_of_Relevant_Ideas_and_Observ
ations/links/568e7ff508aef987e567be0d/The-Molecular-Basis-of-Adaptation-A-Critical-Review-of-Relevant-Ideas-and-Observations.pdf
]The Molecular Basis of Adaptation: A Critical Review[/URL]
Go ahead Joke and show us in the paper the evidence for your limit to evolution within created "kinds". :) |
Umm, loser, there isn't anything in the paper that says macroevolution is possible.
My quote was to show that macro is not just an accumulation of micro, which is perfectly in line with the paper.
timmy has failed to show I quote-mined the paper |
LOL! Joke the dumbass got caught posting a sad YEC quote-mine as his evidence for a limit to evolution in created "kinds". |
My quote was to show that macro is not just an accumulation of micro, which is perfectly in line with the paper.
timmy has failed to show I quote-mined the paper
The EVIDENCE is:
timmy wants to know about limits- mechanisms, timmy- as in there aren't any known mechanisms capable of producing eukaryotes given starting populations of archaea and prokaryotes.
Everything we know says that bacteria always give rise to bacteria. Sponges always give rise to sponges. Fish always give rise to fish. Fruit flies always give rise to fruit flies.
You don't have a mechanism capable of producing anything beyond limited descent with modification.
-------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth
"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton
Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code- Acartia bogart, TARD
YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism
|