Joined: Mar. 2013
|Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 01 2015,16:05)|
|Quote (midwifetoad @ Oct. 01 2015,14:57)|
|Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 01 2015,14:47)|
|Quote (midwifetoad @ Oct. 01 2015,14:43)|
|The very best scientists cannot separate gobbledy form gook.|
But the folks here who allowed the Gary Gaulin thread to carry on for hundreds of pages are nothing if not patient.
As I said that Gary's explanation of intelligence is wrong. He had just followed ToE's idea of intelligence which is wrong.
Now, do you understand my OP?
Yes, I understand that it's garbage. So fucking incoherent, it's not even wrong.
You don't rise to the level of crank.
Really good cranks, like Mr time cube, have mathy fun stuff, or digital Roombas.
So, since you claimed that my new discovery and explanation of intelligence is incoherent, then, you have in your mind the coherent "intelligence".
OK, NOW, let us compare.
WHAT IS the coherent "intelligence" from you?
I need the universal intelligence, simple and scientific and give me one empirical evidence. If your intelligence is not universal to be used for ORIGIN and CAUSE & EFFECT, stop sharing it since it is already invalid.
IF not, I need an apology from you..
Choose, which one is easier for you...
apology or your coherent "intelligence"...
GIVE IT HERE...
We know quite well, with countless examples available, that one need not know a coherent theory of x to be able to recognize that the purported theory is incoherent.
Incoherence can include a wide variety of particular problems. Incoherence in definition vis a vis example cases, incoherence in logical form, incoherence in word usage, with jargon, technical language, or standard form of the language used, etc.
The absence of "the universal intelligence, simple and scientific, with empirical evidence" definition or example could trivially easily be taken to be prima facie evidence that there is no such thing. Things that exist generally guide appropriate language definition and construction as well as example cases in the ongoing development of any given language.
So, we're still waiting for you to come up with a coherent definition and/or example for intelligence.
Be a dear and include a listing of the necessary and sufficient conditions for whatever intelligence turns out to be under your definition.