RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (919) < ... 512 513 514 515 516 [517] 518 519 520 521 522 ... >   
  Topic: Joe G.'s Tardgasm, How long can it last?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,14:59   

Quote
Additional CO2 in the air retains energy which would otherwise radiate into space and re-radiates the energy back into the atmosphere heating the air.


Except for the fact that CO2 does NOT retain energy and the air is already heated beyond what the CO2 can supply.

CO2 does not cause the temperature to increase. Weather forecasters do not need to know the CO2 concentration in order to forecast the temps for the upcoming days.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,15:00   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,14:58)
Quote (Texas Teach @ July 19 2018,14:49)
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ July 19 2018,13:31)
 
Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,12:24)
   
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ July 19 2018,09:45)
Start with the atmosphere.  Heat it with IR energy from the sun.  The air temperature rises until it reaches equilibrium temperature, say 70 deg. F.   Now you add extra  CO2 to the atmosphere which captures and re-emits some extra IR energy into the air.  What happens to the air temperature?

1. It goes up in temperature until it reaches a new equilibrium point, say 72 deg. F.

2. It stays at 70 deg F all day, then stays at 70 deg. F for a few extra hours after sun goes down.

See if Joke the dickless wonder will answer the CO2 question.  Our sources say NO.   :D

What? The IR comes from the surface of the earth.


CO2 does NOT cause the daytime temperature to rise, dipshit. CO2 causes some, a very, very small %, of the surface-emitted IR to be delayed in the race for outer space.

So clearly the answer to your "quiz" is 2-  It stays at 70 deg F all day, then stays nearer to 70 deg. F for a few extra hours after sun goes down.

BWAHAHAHA!!

Joke fails the easiest physics quiz.

Sorry dumbass, the correct answer is 1).  Additional CO2 in the air retains energy which would otherwise radiate into space and re-radiates the energy back into the atmosphere heating the air.

You are the dumbest YEC dumbass on the web Joke, bar none.   :D

I really wish we could explore the wonders of JoeScience.  Think of all the technological uses there would be for magic molecules that would store heat until dusk.

To say nothing of the scientific breakthroughs from his discovery that Frequency = Wavelength.

Yes, Acartia, your ignorance is pathetic. It wasn't a discovery. It is just a proper use of the English language- a language that you apparently do not grasp

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,15:01   

CO2 does not cause an increase in temperatures. That is because the earth is NOT a greenhouse and it is not a car with its windows up.

Do weather forecasters have to know the CO2 content before making their forecast? No. Why? Because CO2 does NOT cause an increase in temps. It just causes the heat to stay around a little longer. That alone is enough to skew the average daily temps making it appear warmer.

That is a fact. Only morons think that CO2 causes higher temps. If that were true then every day we should see record highs as we have record highs of atmospheric CO2.

CO2 only absorbs and emits the infrared @ 2.7, 4.3 and 15 microns (of which 15 is the major part), which is only about 8% of what the Earth radiates. The other 92% is invisible to CO2. And at 410 parts per million it also means every molecule of atmospheric CO2 is surrounded by just over 2400 molecules of non-CO2. Think of a "blanket" with the (single) thread surrounded by that much empty space or a screen with openings 2400x that of the wire. Neither is going to trap anything.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,15:02   



Joey trying to explain science to someone smarter than he is.

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,15:05   




Acartia after getting it's ass handed to it every day

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,15:05   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,15:02)


Joey trying to explain science to someone smarter than he is.

Who would that be? Definitely not anyone who posts here

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,15:18   

Quote (Texas Teach @ July 19 2018,14:49)
 
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ July 19 2018,13:31)
   
Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,12:24)
     
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ July 19 2018,09:45)
Start with the atmosphere.  Heat it with IR energy from the sun.  The air temperature rises until it reaches equilibrium temperature, say 70 deg. F.   Now you add extra  CO2 to the atmosphere which captures and re-emits some extra IR energy into the air.  What happens to the air temperature?

1. It goes up in temperature until it reaches a new equilibrium point, say 72 deg. F.

2. It stays at 70 deg F all day, then stays at 70 deg. F for a few extra hours after sun goes down.

See if Joke the dickless wonder will answer the CO2 question.  Our sources say NO.   :D

What? The IR comes from the surface of the earth.


CO2 does NOT cause the daytime temperature to rise, dipshit. CO2 causes some, a very, very small %, of the surface-emitted IR to be delayed in the race for outer space.

So clearly the answer to your "quiz" is 2-  It stays at 70 deg F all day, then stays nearer to 70 deg. F for a few extra hours after sun goes down.

BWAHAHAHA!!

Joke fails the easiest physics quiz.

Sorry dumbass, the correct answer is 1).  Additional CO2 in the air retains energy which would otherwise radiate into space and re-radiates the energy back into the atmosphere heating the air.

You are the dumbest YEC dumbass on the web Joke, bar none.   :D

I really wish we could explore the wonders of JoeScience.  Think of all the technological uses there would be for magic molecules that would store heat until dusk.

JoePhysics is amazing, innit?

First we learn the energy absorbed and reemitted by CO2 can't cause additional warming unless all the CO2 molecules point the right way.  :D

Now we learn CO2 molecules can magically store the energy until they senses the air is getting cooler, then they activates to keep the air warmer longer.  :D

Joe still wonders why people laugh at him.  

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."

- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,15:40   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ July 19 2018,15:18)
Quote (Texas Teach @ July 19 2018,14:49)
   
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ July 19 2018,13:31)
   
Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,12:24)
       
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ July 19 2018,09:45)
Start with the atmosphere.  Heat it with IR energy from the sun.  The air temperature rises until it reaches equilibrium temperature, say 70 deg. F.   Now you add extra  CO2 to the atmosphere which captures and re-emits some extra IR energy into the air.  What happens to the air temperature?

1. It goes up in temperature until it reaches a new equilibrium point, say 72 deg. F.

2. It stays at 70 deg F all day, then stays at 70 deg. F for a few extra hours after sun goes down.

See if Joke the dickless wonder will answer the CO2 question.  Our sources say NO.   :D

What? The IR comes from the surface of the earth.


CO2 does NOT cause the daytime temperature to rise, dipshit. CO2 causes some, a very, very small %, of the surface-emitted IR to be delayed in the race for outer space.

So clearly the answer to your "quiz" is 2-  It stays at 70 deg F all day, then stays nearer to 70 deg. F for a few extra hours after sun goes down.

BWAHAHAHA!!

Joke fails the easiest physics quiz.

Sorry dumbass, the correct answer is 1).  Additional CO2 in the air retains energy which would otherwise radiate into space and re-radiates the energy back into the atmosphere heating the air.

You are the dumbest YEC dumbass on the web Joke, bar none.   :D

I really wish we could explore the wonders of JoeScience.  Think of all the technological uses there would be for magic molecules that would store heat until dusk.

JoePhysics is amazing, innit?

First we learn the energy absorbed and reemitted by CO2 can't cause additional warming unless all the CO2 molecules point the right way.  :D

Now we learn CO2 molecules can magically store the energy until they senses the air is getting cooler, then they activates to keep the air warmer longer.  :D

Joe still wonders why people laugh at him.  

So you are a deluded faggot and a desperate liar.

CO2 does NOT store energy. CO2 does NOT cause the daytime temps to rise.

And the ONLY way CO2 can act like a blanket is if all the re-emitted energy was back towards the earth.

I expect the regulars here to laugh at me. It's what desperate retards do.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,15:41   

Does anyone else think that CO2, @ 410PPM, produces heat that would raise the daytime temps? If so then please reference the science that supports your claim.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,15:44   

CO2 does not cause an increase in temperatures. That is because the earth is NOT a greenhouse and it is not a car with its windows up.

Do weather forecasters have to know the CO2 content before making their forecast? No. Why? Because CO2 does NOT cause an increase in temps. It just causes the heat to stay around a little longer. That alone is enough to skew the average daily temps making it appear warmer.

That is a fact. Only morons think that CO2 causes higher temps. If that were true then every day we should see record highs as we have record highs of atmospheric CO2.

CO2 only absorbs and emits the infrared @ 2.7, 4.3 and 15 microns (of which 15 is the major part), which is only about 8% of what the Earth radiates. The other 92% is invisible to CO2. And at 410 parts per million it also means every molecule of atmospheric CO2 is surrounded by just over 2400 molecules of non-CO2. Think of a "blanket" with the (single) thread surrounded by that much empty space or a screen with openings 2400x that of the wire. Neither is going to trap anything.


That the people here cannot understand that proves that they are ignorant assholes

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,15:52   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,14:02)


Joey trying to explain science to someone smarter than he is.

Which is which?

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,15:58   

Quote (Henry J @ July 19 2018,15:52)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,14:02)


Joey trying to explain science to someone smarter than he is.

Which is which?

Both are smarter than you and the other evoTARDs here

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,16:11   

Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,15:41)
Does anyone else think that CO2, @ 410PPM, produces heat that would raise the daytime temps? If so then please reference the science that supports your claim.

Nobody has said that CO2 produces heat.

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,16:13   

Quote (Henry J @ July 19 2018,15:52)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,14:02)


Joey trying to explain science to someone smarter than he is.

Which is which?

Well, the parrot is biting off more than he can chew. And parrots are known to repeat the same things over and over and over again. Remind you of anyone?

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,16:38   

Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,15:40)
And the ONLY way CO2 can act like a blanket is if all the re-emitted energy was back towards the earth.

Moar JoePhysics.

If 100% of the CO2 captured and re-emitted energy is directed back toward Earth the planet temperature will get warmer.

But if only 50% of the CO2 captured and re-emitted energy is directed back toward Earth the planet temperature will stay the same and the wind will blow away the extra heat.

:D  :D  :D

 
Quote
I expect the regulars here to laugh at me


You give us excellent reason to.

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."

- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,16:48   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,16:11)
Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,15:41)
Does anyone else think that CO2, @ 410PPM, produces heat that would raise the daytime temps? If so then please reference the science that supports your claim.

Nobody has said that CO2 produces heat.

Occam did. In Occam's example CO2 produced 2 degrees of heat

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,16:49   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,16:13)
Quote (Henry J @ July 19 2018,15:52)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,14:02)


Joey trying to explain science to someone smarter than he is.

Which is which?

Well, the parrot is biting off more than he can chew. And parrots are known to repeat the same things over and over and over again. Remind you of anyone?

evoTARDs always repeat the same nonsense again and again

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,16:51   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ July 19 2018,16:38)
Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,15:40)
And the ONLY way CO2 can act like a blanket is if all the re-emitted energy was back towards the earth.

Moar JoePhysics.

If 100% of the CO2 captured and re-emitted energy is directed back toward Earth the planet temperature will get warmer.

But if only 50% of the CO2 captured and re-emitted energy is directed back toward Earth the planet temperature will stay the same and the wind will blow away the extra heat.

:D  :D  :D

   
Quote
I expect the regulars here to laugh at me


You give us excellent reason to.

And moar reading issues, eh, faggot timmy.

I see that you have FAILed to provide any evidence for your claims. No surprise there.

There isn't any extra heat, timmy. CO2 does not produce extra heat

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,16:53   

Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,16:48)
 
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,16:11)
 
Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,15:41)
Does anyone else think that CO2, @ 410PPM, produces heat that would raise the daytime temps? If so then please reference the science that supports your claim.

Nobody has said that CO2 produces heat.

Occam did. In Occam's example CO2 produced 2 degrees of heat

Poor Joke, you're such a pathetic liar.

CO2 traps outgoing IR radiation, a portion of which is reradiated back to Earth which heats the planet.  The more atmospheric CO2, the more IR energy is trapped and reradiated and the warmer the planet gets.

Real physics, not head-up-your-ass Joke Gallien physics.

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."

- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,16:56   

Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,16:48)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,16:11)
Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,15:41)
Does anyone else think that CO2, @ 410PPM, produces heat that would raise the daytime temps? If so then please reference the science that supports your claim.

Nobody has said that CO2 produces heat.

Occam did. In Occam's example CO2 produced 2 degrees of heat

Reference please.

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,16:57   

Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,16:49)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,16:13)
Quote (Henry J @ July 19 2018,15:52)
 
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,14:02)


Joey trying to explain science to someone smarter than he is.

Which is which?

Well, the parrot is biting off more than he can chew. And parrots are known to repeat the same things over and over and over again. Remind you of anyone?

evoTARDs always repeat the same nonsense again and again

From the “I know you are but what am I” school of debate.

  
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,17:47   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ July 19 2018,15:53)
Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,16:48)
 
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,16:11)
   
Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,15:41)
Does anyone else think that CO2, @ 410PPM, produces heat that would raise the daytime temps? If so then please reference the science that supports your claim.

Nobody has said that CO2 produces heat.

Occam did. In Occam's example CO2 produced 2 degrees of heat

Poor Joke, you're such a pathetic liar.

CO2 traps outgoing IR radiation, a portion of which is reradiated back to Earth which heats the planet.  The more atmospheric CO2, the more IR energy is trapped and reradiated and the warmer the planet gets.

Real physics, not head-up-your-ass Joke Gallien physics.

Wouldn't it be more accurate to say it slows the rate of cooling? At that point, what it does is make the Earth less cool than it would be otherwise.

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,18:42   

Quote (Henry J @ July 19 2018,17:47)
     
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ July 19 2018,15:53)
     
Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,16:48)
         
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,16:11)
         
Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,15:41)
Does anyone else think that CO2, @ 410PPM, produces heat that would raise the daytime temps? If so then please reference the science that supports your claim.

Nobody has said that CO2 produces heat.

Occam did. In Occam's example CO2 produced 2 degrees of heat

Poor Joke, you're such a pathetic liar.

CO2 traps outgoing IR radiation, a portion of which is reradiated back to Earth which heats the planet.  The more atmospheric CO2, the more IR energy is trapped and reradiated and the warmer the planet gets.

Real physics, not head-up-your-ass Joke Gallien physics.

Wouldn't it be more accurate to say it slows the rate of cooling? At that point, what it does is make the Earth less cool than it would be otherwise.

What a stupid semantic argument.  Excess CO2 doesn't make the Earth warmer than less CO2 does, it just makes the planet be less cool.

Not surprising the board's attention whore chimes in, as stupid and clueless as Joke.

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."

- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

  
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: July 19 2018,21:29   

Thou shalt not channel...

  
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 20 2018,10:33   

Missed this masterpiece during this week's torrent o'tard.  (My emphasis)
Quote (Joe G @ July 18 2018,11:45)
OK, so there isn't any evidence that CO2, @ 410 PPM, traps heat. There isn't any evidence that CO2, @ 410 PPM, makes it hotter.

There is evidence that CO2 delays a very small portion or IR from leaving the atmosphere by absorbing it and re-emitting it in various directions. That allows the atmosphere to stay warmer for a longer period of time and because of that making the average temperature of the day a little warmer.

Not hotter.  But warmer.
The Nobel committee really needs to add a Joemodynamics prize.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 20 2018,18:28   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ July 19 2018,16:53)
Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,16:48)
 
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,16:11)
   
Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,15:41)
Does anyone else think that CO2, @ 410PPM, produces heat that would raise the daytime temps? If so then please reference the science that supports your claim.

Nobody has said that CO2 produces heat.

Occam did. In Occam's example CO2 produced 2 degrees of heat

Poor Joke, you're such a pathetic liar.

CO2 traps outgoing IR radiation, a portion of which is reradiated back to Earth which heats the planet.  The more atmospheric CO2, the more IR energy is trapped and reradiated and the warmer the planet gets.

Real physics, not head-up-your-ass Joke Gallien physics.

How does CO2 trap heat?

How long does CO2 hold onto the energy it absorbs?

If the earth is cooler than the atmosphere which way does the heat travel?


If the earth didn't have an atmosphere how hot would the surface be in the day time?

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 20 2018,18:30   

CO2 does not cause an increase in temperatures. That is because the earth is NOT a greenhouse and it is not a car with its windows up.

Do weather forecasters have to know the CO2 content before making their forecast? No. Why? Because CO2 does NOT cause an increase in temps. It just causes the heat to stay around a little longer. That alone is enough to skew the average daily temps making it appear warmer.

That is a fact. Only morons think that CO2 causes higher temps. If that were true then every day we should see record highs as we have record highs of atmospheric CO2.

CO2 only absorbs and emits the infrared @ 2.7, 4.3 and 15 microns (of which 15 is the major part), which is only about 8% of what the Earth radiates. The other 92% is invisible to CO2. And at 410 parts per million it also means every molecule of atmospheric CO2 is surrounded by just over 2400 molecules of non-CO2. Think of a "blanket" with the (single) thread surrounded by that much empty space or a screen with openings 2400x that of the wire. Neither is going to trap anything.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 20 2018,18:31   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,16:57)
Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,16:49)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,16:13)
 
Quote (Henry J @ July 19 2018,15:52)
 
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,14:02)


Joey trying to explain science to someone smarter than he is.

Which is which?

Well, the parrot is biting off more than he can chew. And parrots are known to repeat the same things over and over and over again. Remind you of anyone?

evoTARDs always repeat the same nonsense again and again

From the “I know you are but what am I” school of debate.

Yes, I understand that reality eludes you.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 20 2018,18:31   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,16:56)
Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,16:48)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ July 19 2018,16:11)
 
Quote (Joe G @ July 19 2018,15:41)
Does anyone else think that CO2, @ 410PPM, produces heat that would raise the daytime temps? If so then please reference the science that supports your claim.

Nobody has said that CO2 produces heat.

Occam did. In Occam's example CO2 produced 2 degrees of heat

Reference please.

The previous page.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 20 2018,18:33   

Quote (JohnW @ July 20 2018,10:33)
Missed this masterpiece during this week's torrent o'tard.  (My emphasis)
 
Quote (Joe G @ July 18 2018,11:45)
OK, so there isn't any evidence that CO2, @ 410 PPM, traps heat. There isn't any evidence that CO2, @ 410 PPM, makes it hotter.

There is evidence that CO2 delays a very small portion or IR from leaving the atmosphere by absorbing it and re-emitting it in various directions. That allows the atmosphere to stay warmer for a longer period of time and because of that making the average temperature of the day a little warmer.

Not hotter.  But warmer.
The Nobel committee really needs to add a Joemodynamics prize.

The Nobel committee doesn't seem to have an evoTARD prize. No one has ever won a Nobel for providing support for evolutionism.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
  27552 replies since Feb. 24 2010,12:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (919) < ... 512 513 514 515 516 [517] 518 519 520 521 522 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]