RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (13) < ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] >   
  Topic: Coloration of animals, mimicry, aposematism, Is really natural selection behind it?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 29 2007,16:07   

No, sorry.

Please answer the question.

Do you have an alternate hypothesis for how the coloration of these butterflies has come about, and if so, what is it, how does it work, and how do we test it?  What evidence can you present to support your hypothesis?

"This one guy says evolution sucks" is not a valid scientific hypothesis.

Answer the questions, or go bother someone else.

The end.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
VMartin



Posts: 525
Joined: Nov. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 29 2007,18:16   

Lou FCD

                   
Quote

Do you have an alternate hypothesis for how the coloration of these butterflies has come about, and if so, what is it, how does it work, and how do we test it?  What evidence can you present to support your hypothesis?


I suppose you know that there is a small difference between wasps and butterflies. I answered your questions. We have discussed aposematism of wasps. I am surprised that you changed the topic to the butterflies now. Of course I have no problem to address aposematism of ladybirds, poisonous catterpilars or butterflies as well. Do you want me to discuss aposematism of Monarchs butterflies or other "poisonous" butterflies?
 

Just a question: if you see a colorfull butterfly how do you know it is "aposematic" or "non-aposematic"? Do you have any key which butterfly species are "aposematic" and having "warning coloration" and which not- just seeing their wing patterns? I can explain you something about so called aposematism of butterflies. I can address the problem of aposematism on examples or generally. It's on you.

But I suppose that we are discusssing "aposematism" of wasps preliminary. Anyway no problem to discuss "poisonous"  butterflies, ants or whatever - and their mimics.

But if you are lost in the problem of aposematism and mimicry maybe it's you who should "go bother someone else", don't you think so Lou FCD?

--------------
I could not answer, but should maintain my ground.-
Charles Darwin

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 29 2007,18:21   

Buh bye, Fluff Fluff.

Your trolling days here are finished.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
VMartin



Posts: 525
Joined: Nov. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 29 2007,18:27   

No arguments? Just banning instead or what?

--------------
I could not answer, but should maintain my ground.-
Charles Darwin

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 29 2007,18:27   



--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 29 2007,19:47   

As it is unlikely in the extreme that this conversation will ever go anywhere, I'm locking the thread.

Should anyone (other than VMartin) wish to discuss the topic generally for the sake of actual interest, PM me and I'll either re-open this one or start a fresh one sans VTrolling.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
  365 replies since Sep. 21 2007,11:31 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (13) < ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]