RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (501) < ... 427 428 429 430 431 [432] 433 434 435 436 437 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 3, The Beast Marches On...< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2011,11:43   

Quote
I really am flummoxed by this phrase, "microbe-to-man evolution."


At least it's not as bad as "hydrogen to man" evolution.  :O

  
Driver



Posts: 649
Joined: June 2011

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2011,11:53   

Quote
How long before this turns into another Mathgrrl exchange where KF just starts yelling about incivility and demanding that Elizabeth account for her behaviour. "


He has already laid the groundwork:

 
Quote
it is noteworthy that just for saying he objectively obvious I am now the subject of a slander blog that is produced by one who has no hesitation to indulge in outing intimidatory behaviour, and in outright false accusations of UD being a nest of perversion, as well as a mouth in need of Sister V’s soap cleansing.

Worse, in the name of freedom of expression, such misbehaviour is tolerated or even enabled by those who should know better.


Here. comment 301

Commenting at Mark Frank's blog = "tolerating" or even "enabling".

--------------
Why would I concern myself with evidence, when IMO "evidence" is only the mind arranging thought and matter to support what one already wishes to believe? - William J Murray

[A]t this time a forum like this one is nothing less than a national security risk. - Gary Gaulin

  
Robin



Posts: 1431
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2011,14:25   

Quote (Kristine @ June 13 2011,11:00)
really am flummoxed by this phrase, "microbe-to-man evolution."


Isn't that just a rephrase of the old Gish canard of "hydrogen to humans"/"particles to people" strawman scenarios?

ETA - fixed quote.

--------------
we IDists rule in design for the flagellum and cilium largely because they do look designed.  Bilbo

The only reason you reject Thor is because, like a cushion, you bear the imprint of the biggest arse that sat on you. Louis

  
Jim_Wynne



Posts: 1208
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2011,14:28   

Quote (Robin @ June 13 2011,14:25)
Quote (Kristine @ June 13 2011,11:00)
really am flummoxed by this phrase, "microbe-to-man evolution."


Isn't that just a rephrase of the old Gish canard of "hydrogen to humans"/"particles to people" strawman scenarios?

ETA - fixed quote.

And don't forget "From the goo, to the zoo, to you."

--------------
Evolution is not about laws but about randomness on happanchance.--Robert Byers, at PT

  
noncarborundum



Posts: 320
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2011,14:53   

Quote (Tracy P. Hamilton @ June 13 2011,10:00)
NEWS!!

 
Quote
Can bacteria be smart?
News


Compared to DeNews, yes they are.

 
Quote
b) get a pass because it is all a metaphor, in the same way that the human mind is assumed to be a metaphor for the buzz of neurons?


Only IDiots think any neuroscientist would say, much less assume, that the mind is a metaphor.

Forgive me, but isn't it the other way around?  "Buzz of neurons" is the metaphor here - I don't think neurons literally "buzz".

--------------
"The . . . um . . . okay, I was genetically selected for blue eyes.  I know there are brown eyes, because I've observed them, but I can't do it.  Okay?  So . . . um . . . coz that's real genetic selection, not the nonsense Giberson and the others are talking about." - DO'L

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2011,15:11   

Holy FSM but they've got some stupid gits over at UD.

Here's tsmith arguing over a quote from the Science Daily on the epistasis of beneficial mutations research:

"These results point us toward expecting to see the rate of a population’s fitness declining over time even with the continual addition of new beneficial mutations"

Lizzie points out that a word was accidentally left out somewhere

 
Quote
But either interview missed out a word (easily done), or the transcriber missed it.

“rate..of fitness” doesn’t make sense. Fitness is a scalar, it doesn’t have a rate.

It must be a rate of change of fitness, and in the context, only rate of increase makes sense.


tsmith with his intelligent comeback

 
Quote
again its not transcribed…its a direct quote from cooper himself.


Maybe the IDiot should go look up the definition of "transcribed."

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."

- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

  
noncarborundum



Posts: 320
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2011,15:21   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 13 2011,15:11)
Holy FSM but they've got some stupid gits over at UD.

Here's tsmith arguing over a quote from the Science Daily on the epistasis of beneficial mutations research:

"These results point us toward expecting to see the rate of a population’s fitness declining over time even with the continual addition of new beneficial mutations"

Lizzie points out that a word was accidentally left out somewhere

   
Quote
But either interview missed out a word (easily done), or the transcriber missed it.

“rate..of fitness” doesn’t make sense. Fitness is a scalar, it doesn’t have a rate.

It must be a rate of change of fitness, and in the context, only rate of increase makes sense.


tsmith with his intelligent comeback

   
Quote
again its not transcribed…its a direct quote from cooper himself.


Maybe the IDiot should go look up the definition of "transcribed."

Not to mention that ScienceDaily also says this:
Quote
Cooper and his team focused on a bacterial population that had been evolved for thousands of generations such that its fitness had increased by approximately 35 percent over its ancestor.

If the fitness increased 35%, what could have caused that increase other than beneficial mutations?  Deleterious mutations interfering with each other so as to cause a net positive?  The guiding hand of God the Designer?  What?

--------------
"The . . . um . . . okay, I was genetically selected for blue eyes.  I know there are brown eyes, because I've observed them, but I can't do it.  Okay?  So . . . um . . . coz that's real genetic selection, not the nonsense Giberson and the others are talking about." - DO'L

  
Freddie



Posts: 371
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2011,15:38   

Quote (Freddie @ June 13 2011,03:42)
       
Quote (Ptaylor @ June 13 2011,01:56)
There's some good tard over in the comments on the 'PZ open cut quote mines' thread. (These people and irony really are strangers, aren't they?) Even the one clear headed (in my opinion, of course) commenter, Neil Rickert has tard injected into his comment by the now rarely seen loudspeaker in the ceiling method:
               
Quote
                 
Quote
I have to single out this man, whom I consider the most contemptable, despicable, cruel, and vicious evil liar in the creationist movement today, yes, he’s a nasty, nasty person. (PZ has never met or talked with this ID proponent.)


Maybe the particular ID proponent has written some books, and maybe it is from those books that PZ finds the ID proponent to be a “vicious evil liar.”

I think I listened to the same podcast, and the particular ID proponent was identified as Jonathan Wells. I’m not sure why you omitted that detail. PZ is not the only evolutionist who holds a low opinion of Wells. Larry Moran has been posting a series on his blog (see this post for an example.

(moderator: Neil the language applied would not usually be used of someone who one had not met by a rational clear thinking person. How can someone be “evil” where there is “no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but pitiless indifference” (Dawkins)?)


There's more: Gil has his 2c worth, actually avoiding using the Dodgenator 3000 for once, but still managing to remain content free. There's some serious misconstrual from Barb (who surely merits more discussion here IMO), and JohnnyB tells us that PZ converted him from mere IDiocy to full blown creationism. Just as I'm writing Clive has wandered in and delivered a surprise CS Lewis quote. Touché there, Clive!

Yet again, for the umpteenth time, someone at UD misuses the term "quote mine".  What is it that is so hard to understand about that term that they just don't get it?

I see Paragwinn has asked idnet for sources for those "quote mines".  Nice idea.  

Couldn't find many with a quick search on Pharyngula.  Here's one from MPR (boldening mine):
 
Quote

Smith: Now, you have been described as belonging to a movement that some people call "new atheism." Is there such a thing and do you like the term?

Myers: No. I'm buddies with a lot of the big shot new atheists, people like Richard Dawkins and Dan Dennett.

Smith: They do have some sort of soccer team out there or community group with a jersey and a logo.

Myers: What we have is a whole bunch of people who voice their opinions and are looked to as representative of the new atheist movement. And none of them like the term, because we're not new. There's nothing we're saying that Betrand Russell didn't say. This is all the same old stuff . The only difference is that somehow, in the last 10 years or so, more people have woken up and they're speaking out loudly. They're not holding back. I think that's really the only difference is we've got the primal scream therapy of atheism.

New atheists are the people who shout and yell a lot about this stuff and say, "Wake up, wake up, think about this stuff." But it's the same old stuff that atheists have been talking about for years and years
.

Compare this to the "quote mine":
Quote

I’m buddies with a lot of the big shot new atheists, people like Richard Dawkins and Dan Dennett. There’s nothing we’re saying that Betrand Russell didn’t say. This is all the same old stuff. The only difference is that we’ve got the primal scream therapy of atheism. New atheists are the people who shout and yell a lot about this stuff. But it’s the same old stuff that atheists have been talking about for years and years.

So perhaps I was being harsh before as these really are 'quote mines' in a true sense.  Which just makes idnet dumber than I thought possible to telegraph it.

--------------
Joe: Most criticisims of ID stem from ignorance and jealousy.
Joe: As for the authors of the books in the Bible, well the OT was authored by Moses and the NT was authored by various people.
Byers: The eskimo would not need hairy hair growth as hair, I say, is for keeping people dry. Not warm.

  
Freddie



Posts: 371
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2011,15:57   

Continuing with the theme, from the same MPR interview:
   
Quote
Myers: Well, there's a subtle difference here that what I try to do is promote a conversation that is tolerant. I mean, we do. Think literally about the meaning of the word. We tolerate them, but we do not do is give them a false respect. What this is all about is eroding this unwarranted respect that's given to religion and foolishness like creationism in this country. We back off so much from this and we refuse to confront it. We cover it over with manners and nice words. We shouldn't be doing that. We should be openly dismissing a lot of these bad ideas and doing it loudly and proudly. That's what we do.

But of course the tolerance part is that there's no question that nobody is going to deport creationists. Nobody is going to shut down the churches. Nobody is going to do anything like that. What we want to do is put things in a proper perspective.

Things like religion and creationism do not belong in government. They do not belong in the public schools. If you want to believe that in the privacy of your home, if you want to get together in church and talk to people about this, yes, that's perfectly reasonable. That's the tolerance we'll give them.

But if you're telling me that the earth is 6,000 years old, I'm going to call you an idiot.

vs. the 'Quote Mined' version:
 
Quote

Atheists tend to be politically liberal, fairly tolerant.  The tolerance part is that there’s no question that nobody is going to deport creationists. Nobody is going to shut down the churches. Nobody is going to do anything like that. What we want to do is put things in a proper perspective.  If you want to believe that in the privacy of your home, if you want to get together in church and talk to people about this, yes, that’s perfectly reasonable. That’s the tolerance we’ll give them.

The first sentence in the above came from about 7 or 8 paragraphs earlier in the interview.  

and:
 
Quote
Myers: No, none at all. [laughs] No, I do that all the time. There are some of the people in the intelligent design movement who are incredibly nasty, awful, and misrepresent science in ways that I cannot forgive. At the same time, when you get to know them, when you talk to them, they're generally nice people. They're your neighbors. They're ordinary people. So I would say, right off the bat, no, this is not about demonizing the individuals. It's about demonizing really, really bad ideas.

 
Quote
There are some of the people in the intelligent design movement who are incredibly nasty, awful, and misrepresent science in ways that I cannot forgive. This is not about demonizing the individuals.

As I suspect most of not all of the other quotes are similarly constructed I won't bother to deconstruct and compare them.  I'm hardly surprised, though.

--------------
Joe: Most criticisims of ID stem from ignorance and jealousy.
Joe: As for the authors of the books in the Bible, well the OT was authored by Moses and the NT was authored by various people.
Byers: The eskimo would not need hairy hair growth as hair, I say, is for keeping people dry. Not warm.

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2011,16:38   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 13 2011,15:11)
Holy FSM but they've got some stupid gits over at UD.

Yes, I am having one of those "what is wrong with these people?" moments again. (On the level of seeing carnage/kidnapping on teh news and clapping my hands to my cheeks: "That's terrible! That's awful!" etc.)

Just for kicks and jaw-dropping, I did a search for the word "literally" and came across a Larry Fafarman rant and the bannation of The Pixie. I think I'm going to create a "UD Bingo Card." :)

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
socle



Posts: 322
Joined: July 2009

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2011,19:01   

I found this juxtaposition amusing:

tsmith to Driver:
     
Quote
oh and the quote obviously does….but don’t worry, you won’t let anything get in the way of your faith in the racist eugenicist theory of evolution….


and 22 minutes later attempting a bit of levity with EL:
     
Quote
Elizabeth…I was the first one to show concern…especially if you are beautiful and rich…

if not, nevermind…LOL

  
Driver



Posts: 649
Joined: June 2011

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2011,19:31   

Because it's a scientific debate:

Quote
oh and lets not forget the entire title of Darwin’s book…


On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.

struggle…where have I heard that word used in the title of a book….let me think…..oh yeah….my struggle…mein kempf….

mein kampf…sorry…

-tsmith


Here

--------------
Why would I concern myself with evidence, when IMO "evidence" is only the mind arranging thought and matter to support what one already wishes to believe? - William J Murray

[A]t this time a forum like this one is nothing less than a national security risk. - Gary Gaulin

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2011,20:05   

Quote (Driver @ June 13 2011,19:31)
Because it's a scientific debate:

 
Quote
oh and lets not forget the entire title of Darwin’s book…


On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.

struggle…where have I heard that word used in the title of a book….let me think…..oh yeah….my struggle…mein kempf….

mein kampf…sorry…

-tsmith


Here

Jayzuz H., I went into this a none other than the National Review website - to defend one of the NR's columnists! (The conservative John Derbyshire) Excuse me, as we Darwinists all know, Darwin deliberately avoided any mention of human evolution when he wrote his famous abstract on those "favoured races."

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2011,20:38   

Kampf actually translates to "fight" or "battle", viz, Kampfwagen (tank), not "struggle".

Tsmith is thinking of "jihad". Just wait, s/he'll get there.

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2011,20:46   

That 'tsmith' is a right arrogant eejit, ain't he?

I wonder if he's really a Casey 'unibrow' Luskin sock?  Luskin was the idiot who started this whole clown car rolling with his misunderstanding of the research and results.

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."

- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2011,22:31   

A perfect response, in my opinion. Driver to tsmith:
Quote
Quote
   but evolution has been falsified


The scientists haven’t noticed. They are still doing evolutionary biology. How do you explain it?

It won't impress the low level IDiots, like tsmith, but it represents a fact that the UDers have to face and somehow get around on a daily basis. It seems to be driving Gil, especially, bonkers.

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.†We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.â€
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
Seversky



Posts: 442
Joined: June 2010

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2011,23:16   

Quote (Driver @ June 13 2011,19:31)
Because it's a scientific debate:

 
Quote
oh and lets not forget the entire title of Darwin’s book…


On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.

struggle…where have I heard that word used in the title of a book….let me think…..oh yeah….my struggle…mein kempf….

mein kampf…sorry…

-tsmith


Here

tsmith Godwin's the thread.

I wonder if he's read Mein Kampf?

I wonder if he's read On the Origin of Species?

I wonder if he's aware the Nazi's banned Darwin's work:

Quote
"6. Writings of a philosophical and social nature whose content deals with the false scientific enlightenment of primitive Darwinism and Monism (Häckel)."


-- Prinzipelles zur Säuberung der öffentlichen Bücherein, 1933 (Principles for the Cleansing of Public Libraries)

Probably not.

  
Alan Fox



Posts: 1556
Joined: Aug. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2011,01:50   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 13 2011,15:46)
That 'tsmith' is a right arrogant eejit, ain't he?

I wonder if he's really a Casey 'unibrow' Luskin sock?  Luskin was the idiot who started this whole clown car rolling with his misunderstanding of the research and results.

He does come over as rather obnoxious.  
Quote
oh did the good doctor get back to you? I’m sure he’d drop everything to respond to such an august person as yourself……


I'm hoping for a Marshall McLuhan moment, though, looking at Sanford's track record, it may be a vain hope! Funny how I have had polite, prompt responses recently to emails from both Richard Lenski and Jack Szostak but never got a reply to ones sent to Bill Dembski or Robert Marks.

ETA Stupid boy!

Scratch remarks about Sanford. I see the emailee is Tim Cooper. I see Richard Lenski is co-author. I am sure Professor Cooper will make time to reply.

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2011,06:34   

Quote (realworld33 @ June 14 2011,02:17)
The End of America

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQxmUp9QsNQ



while you were talking NOTHING you lost your country....

http://www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?control=msg&t=15599



what happened to the OLD SH*THEADS?


you don't want to see what happened to the OLD SH*THEADS....


RAT MAN PZ & THE NEW SH*THEADS

 

Could you please stop posting pictures of your girlfriend?  They're making me horny.

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2011,07:43   

I don't think it's his girlfriend - I'm sure he doesn't will never have one -  it's a self portrait.  Good thing it shows his better side.

HTH! :)

Quote
Could you please stop posting pictures of your girlfriend?  They're making me horny.


--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
sparc



Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2011,08:20   

I don't know if this is due to the new Google algorithms but if one searches "intelligent design" UD the home of intelligent design only shows up at page 6 of the Google results.
This may explain a lot:  
Quote
[...] if you want to step into Google's mindset, the questions below provide some guidance on how we've been looking at the issue:

   Would you trust the information presented in this article?
   Is this article written by an expert or enthusiast who knows the topic well, or is it more shallow in nature?
   Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keyword variations?
   Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?
   Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?
   Are the topics driven by genuine interests of readers of the site, or does the site generate content by attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?
   Does the article provide original content or information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?
   Does the page provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?
   How much quality control is done on content?
   Does the article describe both sides of a story?
   Is the site a recognized authority on its topic?
   Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?
   Was the article edited well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?
   For a health related query, would you trust information from this site?
   Would you recognize this site as an authoritative source when mentioned by name?
   Does this article provide a complete or comprehensive description of the topic?
   Does this article contain insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?
   Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?
   Does this article have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?
   Would you expect to see this article in a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?
   Are the articles short, unsubstantial, or otherwise lacking in helpful specifics?
   Are the pages produced with great care and attention to detail vs. less attention to detail?
   Would users complain when they see pages from this site?


ETA link to google blog

--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
Wesley R. Elsberry



Posts: 4991
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2011,08:26   

Quote (sparc @ June 14 2011,08:20)
I don't know if this is due to the new Google algorithms but if one searches "intelligent design" UD the home of intelligent design only shows up at page 6 of the Google results.
This may explain a lot:  
Quote
[...] if you want to step into Google's mindset, the questions below provide some guidance on how we've been looking at the issue:

   Would you trust the information presented in this article?
   Is this article written by an expert or enthusiast who knows the topic well, or is it more shallow in nature?
   Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keyword variations?
   Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?
   Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?
   Are the topics driven by genuine interests of readers of the site, or does the site generate content by attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?
   Does the article provide original content or information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?
   Does the page provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?
   How much quality control is done on content?
   Does the article describe both sides of a story?
   Is the site a recognized authority on its topic?
   Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?
   Was the article edited well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?
   For a health related query, would you trust information from this site?
   Would you recognize this site as an authoritative source when mentioned by name?
   Does this article provide a complete or comprehensive description of the topic?
   Does this article contain insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?
   Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?
   Does this article have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?
   Would you expect to see this article in a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?
   Are the articles short, unsubstantial, or otherwise lacking in helpful specifics?
   Are the pages produced with great care and attention to detail vs. less attention to detail?
   Would users complain when they see pages from this site?

The Discovery Institute is on p.2.

TalkDesign is on p.3.

--------------
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

    
noncarborundum



Posts: 320
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2011,08:42   

Quote (Driver @ June 13 2011,19:31)
Because it's a scientific debate:

   
Quote
oh and lets not forget the entire title of Darwin’s book…


On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.

struggle…where have I heard that word used in the title of a book….let me think…..oh yeah….my struggle…mein kempf….

mein kampf…sorry…

-tsmith


Here

You know who else wrote about a struggle?

I mean, seriously.  Has he ever searched "struggle" at Amazon.com?

--------------
"The . . . um . . . okay, I was genetically selected for blue eyes.  I know there are brown eyes, because I've observed them, but I can't do it.  Okay?  So . . . um . . . coz that's real genetic selection, not the nonsense Giberson and the others are talking about." - DO'L

  
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2011,09:47   

Quote
It won't impress the low level IDiots, like tsmith, but it represents a fact that the UDers have to face and somehow get around on a daily basis. It seems to be driving Gil, especially, bonkers.

That's probably a short drive.

(Did I say that?)

  
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2011,09:54   

Quote (Henry J @ June 14 2011,09:47)
Quote
It won't impress the low level IDiots, like tsmith, but it represents a fact that the UDers have to face and somehow get around on a daily basis. It seems to be driving Gil, especially, bonkers.

That's probably a short drive.

(Did I say that?)

It's definitely just a putt.

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
Schroedinger's Dog



Posts: 1692
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2011,10:00   

Quote (Albatrossity2 @ June 14 2011,15:54)
Quote (Henry J @ June 14 2011,09:47)
Quote
It won't impress the low level IDiots, like tsmith, but it represents a fact that the UDers have to face and somehow get around on a daily basis. It seems to be driving Gil, especially, bonkers.

That's probably a short drive.

(Did I say that?)

It's definitely just a putt.

Trying to get the ball rolling on some pun cascade, I see. I know how it is, I'm a member of the club. let's have it rough!

--------------
"Hail is made out of water? Are you really that stupid?" Joe G

"I have a better suggestion, Kris. How about a game of hide and go fuck yourself instead." Louis

"The reason people use a crucifix against vampires is that vampires are allergic to bullshit" Richard Pryor

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2011,10:06   

Quote (Schroedinger's Dog @ June 14 2011,10:00)
Quote (Albatrossity2 @ June 14 2011,15:54)
Quote (Henry J @ June 14 2011,09:47)
 
Quote
It won't impress the low level IDiots, like tsmith, but it represents a fact that the UDers have to face and somehow get around on a daily basis. It seems to be driving Gil, especially, bonkers.

That's probably a short drive.

(Did I say that?)

It's definitely just a putt.

Trying to get the ball rolling on some pun cascade, I see. I know how it is, I'm a member of the club. let's have it rough!

That's just not cricket.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
KCdgw



Posts: 376
Joined: Sep. 2002

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2011,10:46   

Quote (Richardthughes @ June 14 2011,10:06)
Quote (Schroedinger's Dog @ June 14 2011,10:00)
Quote (Albatrossity2 @ June 14 2011,15:54)
 
Quote (Henry J @ June 14 2011,09:47)
 
Quote
It won't impress the low level IDiots, like tsmith, but it represents a fact that the UDers have to face and somehow get around on a daily basis. It seems to be driving Gil, especially, bonkers.

That's probably a short drive.

(Did I say that?)

It's definitely just a putt.

Trying to get the ball rolling on some pun cascade, I see. I know how it is, I'm a member of the club. let's have it rough!

That's just not cricket.

This isn't bowling me over.

--------------
Those who know the truth are not equal to those who love it-- Confucius

  
Freddie



Posts: 371
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2011,10:50   

Quote (KCdgw @ June 14 2011,10:46)
Quote (Richardthughes @ June 14 2011,10:06)
Quote (Schroedinger's Dog @ June 14 2011,10:00)
 
Quote (Albatrossity2 @ June 14 2011,15:54)
 
Quote (Henry J @ June 14 2011,09:47)
   
Quote
It won't impress the low level IDiots, like tsmith, but it represents a fact that the UDers have to face and somehow get around on a daily basis. It seems to be driving Gil, especially, bonkers.

That's probably a short drive.

(Did I say that?)

It's definitely just a putt.

Trying to get the ball rolling on some pun cascade, I see. I know how it is, I'm a member of the club. let's have it rough!

That's just not cricket.

This isn't bowling me over.

Rather than a short drive I believe it is a fair way!

--------------
Joe: Most criticisims of ID stem from ignorance and jealousy.
Joe: As for the authors of the books in the Bible, well the OT was authored by Moses and the NT was authored by various people.
Byers: The eskimo would not need hairy hair growth as hair, I say, is for keeping people dry. Not warm.

  
Schroedinger's Dog



Posts: 1692
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2011,10:54   

Quote (Freddie @ June 14 2011,16:50)
Quote (KCdgw @ June 14 2011,10:46)
Quote (Richardthughes @ June 14 2011,10:06)
 
Quote (Schroedinger's Dog @ June 14 2011,10:00)
 
Quote (Albatrossity2 @ June 14 2011,15:54)
   
Quote (Henry J @ June 14 2011,09:47)
   
Quote
It won't impress the low level IDiots, like tsmith, but it represents a fact that the UDers have to face and somehow get around on a daily basis. It seems to be driving Gil, especially, bonkers.

That's probably a short drive.

(Did I say that?)

It's definitely just a putt.

Trying to get the ball rolling on some pun cascade, I see. I know how it is, I'm a member of the club. let's have it rough!

That's just not cricket.

This isn't bowling me over.

Rather than a short drive I believe it is a fair way!

As long as he's ready to go the whole nine yards...

--------------
"Hail is made out of water? Are you really that stupid?" Joe G

"I have a better suggestion, Kris. How about a game of hide and go fuck yourself instead." Louis

"The reason people use a crucifix against vampires is that vampires are allergic to bullshit" Richard Pryor

   
  15001 replies since Sep. 04 2009,16:20 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (501) < ... 427 428 429 430 431 [432] 433 434 435 436 437 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]