RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (25) < ... 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 >   
  Topic: FTK Research Thread, let's clear this up once and for all< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
carlsonjok



Posts: 3324
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 29 2007,15:05   

Quote (Arden Chatfield @ June 29 2007,15:02)
Quote (Richardthughes @ June 29 2007,14:34)
Quote (carlsonjok @ June 29 2007,12:54)
           
Quote


RTH - "HUBBA HUBBA YABBA DABBA DOOO"

[Lip tremble]

Ooooh, that hurts. I have feelings, you know.

[/Lip tremble]

Richard, I would have you know that "HUBBA HUBBA YABBA DABBA DOOO"  is an exact quote from a post you made here last February 31st. Look it up if you don't believe me.  :angry:

He's just upset because I wrote that in an over-the-top pretentious British accent.

--------------
It's natural to be curious about our world, but the scientific method is just one theory about how to best understand it.  We live in a democracy, which means we should treat every theory equally. - Steven Colbert, I Am America (and So Can You!)

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11110
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 29 2007,15:11   

Quote (Arden Chatfield @ June 29 2007,15:02)
Quote (Richardthughes @ June 29 2007,14:34)
Quote (carlsonjok @ June 29 2007,12:54)
           
Quote


RTH - "HUBBA HUBBA YABBA DABBA DOOO"

[Lip tremble]

Ooooh, that hurts. I have feelings, you know.

[/Lip tremble]

Richard, I would have you know that "HUBBA HUBBA YABBA DABBA DOOO"  is an exact quote from a post you made here last February 31st. Look it up if you don't believe me.  :angry:

Link me up, Chatterbox, or You'll get banninated in 6 days by Wes the destroyer.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 29 2007,15:20   

Quote (Richardthughes @ June 29 2007,15:11)
 
Quote (Arden Chatfield @ June 29 2007,15:02)
   
Quote (Richardthughes @ June 29 2007,14:34)
   
Quote (carlsonjok @ June 29 2007,12:54)
               
Quote


RTH - "HUBBA HUBBA YABBA DABBA DOOO"

[Lip tremble]

Ooooh, that hurts. I have feelings, you know.

[/Lip tremble]

Richard, I would have you know that "HUBBA HUBBA YABBA DABBA DOOO"  is an exact quote from a post you made here last February 31st. Look it up if you don't believe me.  :angry:

Link me up, Chatterbox, or You'll get banninated in 6 days by Wes the destroyer.

Hey, pal, I got your 'link' RIGHT HERE:

:angry:

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 29 2007,15:24   

steve:
Quote
If FtK wants to complain she's being mistreated, she's welcome to set a better example. However, something tells me that were I to visit her blog, I would not be allowed to post 447 straight comments with no interference.


Hmmm.  I made about 2 comments (on topic and constructive) before I was told I couldn't post anymore unless I was nice.  Later I was able to post a couple handfuls more.

She then allowed some of my anonymous comments through because she doesn't know how to flag IP addresses.  I then told her who anonymous was while continuing to be completely on topic.  I'd be banned now except she doesn't know how to do it.

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
Steviepinhead



Posts: 532
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 29 2007,15:39   

Blipey, shamelessly quote-mined:
Quote
she doesn't know how to do it.

Hmm.  Must not be completely ignorant.  Doesn't she claim to have kids?

  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 29 2007,15:47   

Quote (Steviepinhead @ June 29 2007,15:39)
Blipey, shamelessly quote-mined:
   
Quote
she doesn't know how to do it.

Hmm.  Must not be completely ignorant.  Doesn't she claim to have kids?

Ooh, can I play?

 
Quote
If FtK wants... I would... be allowed... with no interference.


Hey! No wonder Salvador enjoys this!

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 29 2007,17:31   

Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ June 29 2007,10:14)
FtK makes the claim that a series of posts that she made in the Walt Brown thread are analogous to other series of posts that Lenny Flank has posted elsewhere. Let's look at the content:

Quote

[Post 1] Lenny is a weirdo.

[Post 2] I'm practicing posting Lenny style.

[Post 3] I wonder how many separate posts in a row I could accumulate before Steve would ban me.

[Post 4] Evolution is dead, dead, dead.

Bwha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

[Post 5] Lenny is the antichrist...

[Post 6] I don't like Lenny's avitar.

[Post 7] Lenny the loser makes me barf.

[Post 8] Mimicking Lenny makes me feel like I'm a 3rd grader.  Creepy.



I'm going to invoke the following rule:

Quote

Messages making claims about the actions, beliefs, or intentions of identifiable participants are an implicit call for discussion. The claimant is responsible for such claims. Failure to retract unsupported claims about other participants is grounds for banishment.


FtK can back up the claim that Lenny has made such a series of posts, including the same lack of content and reliance upon simple insult for the same number of posts, or retract the claim. I will determine how well convincing a proposed demonstration is. FtK has one week to accomplish one or the other.

Back in your court, FtK. If there is no response doing one or the other by July 6th, I'll consider that a default.

In case there's any question about it, I don't actually give a flying . . .  uh . . .  fig, what FTK thinks.  About me, or about anything else.  (shrug)

She needs serious therapy.

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 29 2007,17:33   

Quote (Ftk @ June 29 2007,10:25)
No, I don't want to be banned, but go ahead if that is what you feel is necessary.

Wow, FTK, your martyrdom wheelbarrow will be full for at least a YEAR now !!!!!!!!!!!!

Congratulations.  Nicely done.

Enjoy your martyrdom.

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 29 2007,18:37   

Well, at least FTK has once again successfully managed to turn this from a discussion about HER, into a discussion about ME.  (shrug)

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
Steviepinhead



Posts: 532
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 29 2007,18:53   

Well, but that's okay.

Having seen her picture, you're definitely cuter.

And I haven't even seen your picture (but I do know that small scaly animals love you and pizza boys can stand to make deliveries to your door...).

Whereas, how many snakes or pizza boys are willing to go to FtK's door.

There's a reason why these people have to get 'em when they're young.

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 29 2007,20:02   

This has got be some kind of heavenly troll-stew for FTK.  Stir occasionally, and AtBC boils itself.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
Wesley R. Elsberry



Posts: 4930
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,03:38   

Well, at least right up to the point when no further dodging is permitted.

--------------
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

    
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,09:04   

I told Elsberry privately that I'm done here, but evidently he's not going to relay that to his "minions".  

I will not be "retracting" anything.  Actually, Lenny should be apologizing to Ian and I for not keeping his word and staying off the thread.

The thing is, that I'm not familiar with anything that Lenny has ever said that is so terribly enlightening.  I'm only familiar with him from this forum and comments I've seen on occassion at PT.  From the time I started posting here, he's offered absolutely nothing but snide remarks...virtually no science involved.  So, if he is some sort of science wiz master, I've never been subject to his words of wisdom.

Ian and I have found a private venue in which to discuss various issues further.  

Don't worry, I won't cry martyrdom in regard to my departure.  I'll let Elsberry off the hook so he won't be accused of using the "banninator button".   It's time to go anyway because I've scanned through some of the threads here where other people from my "side" have tried to reason with you folks, and it's futile.

Nice meeting all of you though.  It's been interesting.

Bye Richard... ;)

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,09:11   

Quote (Ftk @ June 30 2007,09:04)
I told Elsberry privately that I'm done here, but evidently he's not going to relay that to his "minions".

Well, perhaps he was just being protective of your privacy; didn't we have a conversation once about posting the contents of private emails without the permission of the sender? And isn't it nice to be able to post here and explain yourself in your own words without having a moderator intervene? :p

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,09:14   

Quote (Ftk @ June 30 2007,09:04)
I told Elsberry privately that I'm done here

Again?


Then leave, already.


Bye.  (waving as you ride off into the sunset on your snow white horse)

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,09:32   

Quote (Ftk @ June 30 2007,09:04)
I told Elsberry privately that I'm done here, but evidently he's not going to relay that to his "minions".  

I will not be "retracting" anything.  Actually, Lenny should be apologizing to Ian and I for not keeping his word and staying off the thread.

The thing is, that I'm not familiar with anything that Lenny has ever said that is so terribly enlightening.  I'm only familiar with him from this forum and comments I've seen on occassion at PT.  From the time I started posting here, he's offered absolutely nothing but snide remarks...virtually no science involved.  So, if he is some sort of science wiz master, I've never been subject to his words of wisdom.

Ian and I have found a private venue in which to discuss various issues further.  

Don't worry, I won't cry martyrdom in regard to my departure.  I'll let Elsberry off the hook so he won't be accused of using the "banninator button".   It's time to go anyway because I've scanned through some of the threads here where other people from my "side" have tried to reason with your folks, and it's futile.

Nice meeting all of you though.  It's been interesting.

Bye Richard... ;)

you've already gone off in a huff several times. Nobody cared then either.

Quote
I will not be "retracting" anything.


except your neck.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,10:14   

FTK,

Thank you for this opportunity:

Don't go away mad (Just go away)

Pay particular attention to the lyrics from about 2 mins and 25 seconds into the song.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,10:42   

Quote (Ftk @ June 30 2007,09:04)
The thing is, that I'm not familiar with anything that Lenny has ever said that is so terribly enlightening.  I'm only familiar with him from this forum and comments I've seen on occassion at PT.  From the time I started posting here, he's offered absolutely nothing but snide remarks...virtually no science involved.

BTW, for those who have not already seen, I offer:


http://www.geocities.com/lflank

Around 400 pages worth of science and analysis.

Alas, all now essentially irrelevant, and of interest only for historical reasons, since ID is now dead as a mackerel, and the anti-ID fight is now all but over.  

All that remains is to laugh and make snide remarks at the antics of the ID diehards.

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
PennyBright



Posts: 78
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,11:01   

Quote (Ftk @ June 30 2007,09:04)
The thing is, that I'm not familiar with anything that Lenny has ever said that is so terribly enlightening.  I'm only familiar with him from this forum and comments I've seen on occassion at PT.  From the time I started posting here, he's offered absolutely nothing but snide remarks...virtually no science involved.  So, if he is some sort of science wiz master, I've never been subject to his words of wisdom.

Unless my grasp of the English language is utterly deficient, I am quite certain that Lenny has never intended to enlighten anyone.

What he does mean to do (as I read it)  is to make glaringly obvious in a succinct and un-ignorable way the specific objections to and/or flaws in a given statement.

And really,  given the attention spans and level of reading comprehension demonstrated by most creationists,  the one line per post thing is almost forgiveable.

--------------
Conversation should be pleasant without scurrility, witty without affectation, free without indecency, learned without conceitedness, novel without falsehood. - Shakespeare (reputedly)

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,11:03   

Quote ("Rev Dr" Lenny Flank @ June 30 2007,10:42)
 
Quote (Ftk @ June 30 2007,09:04)
The thing is, that I'm not familiar with anything that Lenny has ever said that is so terribly enlightening.  I'm only familiar with him from this forum and comments I've seen on occassion at PT.  From the time I started posting here, he's offered absolutely nothing but snide remarks...virtually no science involved.

BTW, for those who have not already seen, I offer:


http://www.geocities.com/lflank

Around 400 pages worth of science and analysis.

Alas, all now essentially irrelevant, and of interest only for historical reasons, since ID is now dead as a mackerel, and the anti-ID fight is now all but over.  

All that remains is to laugh and make snide remarks at the antics of the ID diehards.

Lenny,  

I've been loosing sleep. "Dead as a mackerel" isn't any more or less dead than, say, "dead as a cocker spaniel."

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,12:50   

Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ June 30 2007,11:03)
I've been loosing sleep. "Dead as a mackerel" isn't any more or less dead than, say, "dead as a cocker spaniel."

Well, I use it in memory of our dear departed Fish Guy (who alas would have throughly enjoyed FTK's latest histrionic departure).

Anyway, saying "dead as a mackerel" evokes the mental image of a cold slimy fish lying still in the icebox, with slack jaw and one big round eye staring vacantly up at you.

"Dead as a cocker spaniel" just evokes the image of a big brown splash on the highway.

While indeed both accurately depict the current status of the ID movement, the "dead fish" image is, at least to me, far more humorous.



Geez, first I had to explain "penii", now I gotta explain "dead as a mackerel".  No WONDER satirists stay away from scientist audiences . . . . .

;)

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,12:58   

Quote (PennyBright @ June 30 2007,11:01)
Unless my grasp of the English language is utterly deficient, I am quite certain that Lenny has never intended to enlighten anyone.

Why attempt the impossible?  If I want to talk science with the pig-ignorant, I can discuss Einstein with my goldfish and get the same level of effectiveness (the difference of course being that at least the goldfish isn't WILLFULLY pig-ignorant).


I'm here to laugh at the nutters and make fun of them.  Nothing more. It's all they are worth nowadays.

If, in the future, the nutters ever become an effective political movement again, I'll happily go back to stomping their movement into the dirt again, as quickly and efficiently as I can.

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
Rev. BigDumbChimp



Posts: 185
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,12:59   

Quote (Ftk @ June 30 2007,09:04)
I told Elsberry privately that I'm done here, but evidently he's not going to relay that to his "minions".  

I will not be "retracting" anything.  Actually, Lenny should be apologizing to Ian and I for not keeping his word and staying off the thread.

The thing is, that I'm not familiar with anything that Lenny has ever said that is so terribly enlightening.  I'm only familiar with him from this forum and comments I've seen on occassion at PT.  From the time I started posting here, he's offered absolutely nothing but snide remarks...virtually no science involved.  So, if he is some sort of science wiz master, I've never been subject to his words of wisdom.

Ian and I have found a private venue in which to discuss various issues further.  

Don't worry, I won't cry martyrdom in regard to my departure.  I'll let Elsberry off the hook so he won't be accused of using the "banninator button".   It's time to go anyway because I've scanned through some of the threads here where other people from my "side" have tried to reason with your folks, and it's futile.

Nice meeting all of you though.  It's been interesting.

Bye Richard... ;)

In other news. I stepped in dogshit mowing the lawn today.

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,14:52   

Quote ("Rev Dr" Lenny Flank @ June 30 2007,12:58)
Why attempt the impossible?  If I want to talk science with the pig-ignorant, I can discuss Einstein with my goldfish and get the same level of effectiveness (the difference of course being that at least the goldfish isn't WILLFULLY pig-ignorant).

Lenny, now you are REALLY confusing me with all the complicated animals. Talk to a goldfish for pig-ignorance? Is there a pig I can talk to for fish-ignorance?

I think Lenny is telling us that ID is ALIVE and FTK is ERUDITE. RUN, EVERYBODY! RUN!

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,15:37   

Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ June 30 2007,14:52)
Lenny, now you are REALLY confusing me with all the complicated animals. Talk to a goldfish for pig-ignorance? Is there a pig I can talk to for fish-ignorance?

If I could talk to the animals, just imagine it,
Chattin' with a chimp in chimpanzee,
Imagine talking to a tiger, chatting with a cheetah,
What a neat achievement it would be!

If we could talk to the animals, learn their languages,
Maybe get an animal degree,
I'd study elephant and eagle, buffalo and beagle,
Alligator, guinea pig, and flea!

I would converse in polar bear and python,
And I would curse in fluent kangaroo,
If people ask me "can you speak rhinoceros?"
I'd say "of courserous! Can't you?"

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,15:42   

Actually, when it comes to discussion with creationists, perhaps THIS stanza is most appropriate:



If I spoke slang to orangutans
The advantages why any fool on earth could plainly see!
Discussing Eastern art and dramas
With intellectual llamas
That’s a big step forward you’ll agree!

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,15:46   

Quote ("Rev Dr" Lenny Flank @ June 30 2007,15:42)
Actually, when it comes to discussion with creationists, perhaps THIS stanza is most appropriate:

Now I understand the problem - nowhere in those verses does it mention that you can understand pirahna!

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,15:53   

Quote (Albatrossity2 @ June 30 2007,15:46)
Now I understand the problem - nowhere in those verses does it mention that you can understand pirahna!

Just a goldfish that THINKS it's a pirahna.

;)

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
Henry J



Posts: 5042
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,17:34   

Quote
It's time to go anyway because I've scanned through some of the threads here where other people from my "side" have tried to reason with you folks, and it's futile.


Yeah, arguing without having an actual argument can have that effect.

Henry

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11110
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 30 2007,17:38   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ June 30 2007,09:32)
Quote
I will not be "retracting" anything.


except your neck.

Badum-tssssch!

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
  748 replies since June 10 2007,02:04 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (25) < ... 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]