RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (36) < ... 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense: The BlogCzar Years. Er, Months., Record of all the bans and threats at UD< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 3057
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 08 2014,09:29   

Quote (socle @ Nov. 08 2014,09:24)
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Nov. 08 2014,08:49)
Posted without comment

         
Quote

Barry Arrington November 8, 2014 at 8:41 am

Joe @ 13.

“Grow up.”

Having been warned repeatedly to stick to the issues and to lay off the personal attacks, this was the straw that broke the camel’s back.

Joe is no longer with us.


:D  :D  :D  :D  :D

Truly an historic day.  

My question is, will he attempt a sock?


Not if but when.

An e-beer to the first one to identify the new JoeTard sock!

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"Global warming can't be real because it still gets cooler at night"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"

Whizz-dumb from Joe Gallien, world's dumbest YEC

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 3057
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 08 2014,09:30   

page bug bump

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"Global warming can't be real because it still gets cooler at night"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"

Whizz-dumb from Joe Gallien, world's dumbest YEC

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 08 2014,12:10   

I wish that I felt otherwise but I'm sure that joey's ban won't last long. He will either use a sock, as others have suggested, or he will re-register and arrington won't do anything about it, or he will email arrington (and likely already did) and spew some dishonest, pathetic crap about how he (joey) is the innocent victim of the big bad 'evo' meanies, and he will assure arrington that he will be a good boy. joey will likely also email other IDiots (especially gordo) and try to get them to lobby arrington for 'forgiveness' and joey's reinstatement.

If or when joey's ban is lifted, he will quickly show that he is still the belligerent, incorrigible, cowardly, moronic, lying IDiot-creationist that he has always been. In the meantime joey will likely spew multiple, blame shifting tirades on his blog about how unfair the ban is.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
OgreMkV



Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 08 2014,12:23   

Quote (The whole truth @ Nov. 08 2014,12:10)
I wish that I felt otherwise but I'm sure that joey's ban won't last long. He will either use a sock, as others have suggested, or he will re-register and arrington won't do anything about it, or he will email arrington (and likely already did) and spew some dishonest, pathetic crap about how he (joey) is the innocent victim of the big bad 'evo' meanies, and he will assure arrington that he will be a good boy. joey will likely also email other IDiots (especially gordo) and try to get them to lobby arrington for 'forgiveness' and joey's reinstatement.

If or when joey's ban is lifted, he will quickly show that he is still the belligerent, incorrigible, cowardly, moronic, lying IDiot-creationist that he has always been. In the meantime joey will likely spew multiple, blame shifting tirades on his blog about how unfair the ban is.

I don't think he will complain about the ban.

This is his support group. These are the only people on the planet that even come close to accepting him and believing as he does.

He won't complain about them any more than he argues with Gordo about whether the Mullings Interpretation of the CSI is correct.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
Soapy Sam



Posts: 659
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 08 2014,12:31   

Now, here's a new sensation - a shred of respect for something Barry says:  

Quote
But sometimes it seems like “vituperative” is all you [Joe] do.

Our opponents have noticed this too, and they are calling us hypocrites for not dealing with it. That criticism is not entirely unfair.


--------------
SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G

BTW, when you make little jabs like “I thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,” you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 08 2014,13:17   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Nov. 08 2014,10:23)
Quote (The whole truth @ Nov. 08 2014,12:10)
I wish that I felt otherwise but I'm sure that joey's ban won't last long. He will either use a sock, as others have suggested, or he will re-register and arrington won't do anything about it, or he will email arrington (and likely already did) and spew some dishonest, pathetic crap about how he (joey) is the innocent victim of the big bad 'evo' meanies, and he will assure arrington that he will be a good boy. joey will likely also email other IDiots (especially gordo) and try to get them to lobby arrington for 'forgiveness' and joey's reinstatement.

If or when joey's ban is lifted, he will quickly show that he is still the belligerent, incorrigible, cowardly, moronic, lying IDiot-creationist that he has always been. In the meantime joey will likely spew multiple, blame shifting tirades on his blog about how unfair the ban is.

I don't think he will complain about the ban.

This is his support group. These are the only people on the planet that even come close to accepting him and believing as he does.

He won't complain about them any more than he argues with Gordo about whether the Mullings Interpretation of the CSI is correct.

His complaining has already started. I'm a bit surprised at how joey is going about it by ridiculing arrington because, as you said, "This is his support group. These are the only people on the planet that even come close to accepting him and believing as he does." However, when I consider how stupid, belligerent, and incorrigible joey is it isn't very surprising that he shits in his own bed.  

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/....pot.com

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 3057
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 08 2014,13:26   

Quote (Soapy Sam @ Nov. 08 2014,12:31)
Now, here's a new sensation - a shred of respect for something Barry says:  

   
Quote
But sometimes it seems like “vituperative” is all you [Joe] do.

Our opponents have noticed this too, and they are calling us hypocrites for not dealing with it. That criticism is not entirely unfair.

Joe's behavior has been so over the top that not even Barry could ignore it anymore.

I hope the huge irony of Joe complaining that he was unfairly banned by UD isn't lost on anyone.   :D

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"Global warming can't be real because it still gets cooler at night"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"

Whizz-dumb from Joe Gallien, world's dumbest YEC

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11118
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 08 2014,13:44   

He's emailing KF crying right now. He's already sold him a crock about how Darwinists ate his babies, and KF being quick to find offense with evo-mat naughties bought it hook, line and stinker.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
fnxtr



Posts: 2924
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 09 2014,12:29   

Quote (The whole truth @ Nov. 08 2014,11:17)
Quote (OgreMkV @ Nov. 08 2014,10:23)
 
Quote (The whole truth @ Nov. 08 2014,12:10)
I wish that I felt otherwise but I'm sure that joey's ban won't last long. He will either use a sock, as others have suggested, or he will re-register and arrington won't do anything about it, or he will email arrington (and likely already did) and spew some dishonest, pathetic crap about how he (joey) is the innocent victim of the big bad 'evo' meanies, and he will assure arrington that he will be a good boy. joey will likely also email other IDiots (especially gordo) and try to get them to lobby arrington for 'forgiveness' and joey's reinstatement.

If or when joey's ban is lifted, he will quickly show that he is still the belligerent, incorrigible, cowardly, moronic, lying IDiot-creationist that he has always been. In the meantime joey will likely spew multiple, blame shifting tirades on his blog about how unfair the ban is.

I don't think he will complain about the ban.

This is his support group. These are the only people on the planet that even come close to accepting him and believing as he does.

He won't complain about them any more than he argues with Gordo about whether the Mullings Interpretation of the CSI is correct.

His complaining has already started. I'm a bit surprised at how joey is going about it by ridiculing arrington because, as you said, "This is his support group. These are the only people on the planet that even come close to accepting him and believing as he does." However, when I consider how stupid, belligerent, and incorrigible joey is it isn't very surprising that he shits in his own bed.  

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com

The funny part is on his entire visible recent postings page there are about 9 comments in total for all his venting. Clearly a game-changer, our Joey.

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
REC



Posts: 638
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 09 2014,13:04   

I hope Barry takes him back soon.

Joe has (he says):
1) Run for government
2) Harassed school-boards/demanded classroom access
3) "a fight against our corrupt educational system to wage"

And now he has 6? 8? 12? more hours a day to do it.

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 09 2014,13:56   

Quote (fnxtr @ Nov. 09 2014,10:29)
Quote (The whole truth @ Nov. 08 2014,11:17)
 
Quote (OgreMkV @ Nov. 08 2014,10:23)
 
Quote (The whole truth @ Nov. 08 2014,12:10)
I wish that I felt otherwise but I'm sure that joey's ban won't last long. He will either use a sock, as others have suggested, or he will re-register and arrington won't do anything about it, or he will email arrington (and likely already did) and spew some dishonest, pathetic crap about how he (joey) is the innocent victim of the big bad 'evo' meanies, and he will assure arrington that he will be a good boy. joey will likely also email other IDiots (especially gordo) and try to get them to lobby arrington for 'forgiveness' and joey's reinstatement.

If or when joey's ban is lifted, he will quickly show that he is still the belligerent, incorrigible, cowardly, moronic, lying IDiot-creationist that he has always been. In the meantime joey will likely spew multiple, blame shifting tirades on his blog about how unfair the ban is.

I don't think he will complain about the ban.

This is his support group. These are the only people on the planet that even come close to accepting him and believing as he does.

He won't complain about them any more than he argues with Gordo about whether the Mullings Interpretation of the CSI is correct.

His complaining has already started. I'm a bit surprised at how joey is going about it by ridiculing arrington because, as you said, "This is his support group. These are the only people on the planet that even come close to accepting him and believing as he does." However, when I consider how stupid, belligerent, and incorrigible joey is it isn't very surprising that he shits in his own bed.  

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com

The funny part is on his entire visible recent postings page there are about 9 comments in total for all his venting. Clearly a game-changer, our Joey.

And 4 of those 9 comments are by joey. None are by any other IDiots. I'm shocked, shocked I tell you, that joey's fellow IDiots aren't supporting him on his blog. :)

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 07 2014,11:42   

Pachyaena has been banned at UD. Oh well, it was fun while it lasted.

I'll paste my response to William J Murray's number 55 comment in this thread here since I'm now unable to post it at UD:

William J Murray, first of all, your use of the labels "Darwinism" and "Darwinists" shows that you're clueless. I'm going to replace your labels with 'non-IDer scientists' or 'non-IDers'.

Now, you have, and are asserting, a MASSIVE misconception of how non-IDer scientists think and how they approach the study of nature. No non-IDer scientist goes around thinking that nature is just a "haphazard" pile of rocks and that nothing has a purpose (or a 'function'). There are LOTS of things in nature that have a purpose (a 'function') but that does NOT mean that those things were/are designed and created by some (or a particular) supernatural-designer-creator-god.

Purpose (or 'function') can be defined in more than one way, as you should know. You IDers see purpose/function only as something that comes from some (or a particular) supernatural-designer-creator-god. In another thread you said you agree that weather is unguided/undesigned, so you must believe that weather has no purpose/function. I'm sure that a lot of (if not all) non-IDers and non-IDer scientists (including staunch atheists) would disagree with you and would say that weather does have a purpose/function but that it's not or not necessarily a purpose/function that was/is designed-created-guided by some (or a particular) supernatural-designer-creator-god. You're trying to make it look as though non-IDer scientists and other non-IDers are just a bunch of zombie robots that see everything in the universe (including life, evolution, etc.) as nothing but "haphazard" slop but that's NOT true.

And none of the things you listed are a "change", and especially a productive/positive/profound "change", from how science is already done.

You said: "ID theory only claims that ID is a necessary part of the causal chain wrt designed artifacts."

That is a lie.

You also said: "I’m being as honest as I can be."

Then you've got a lot to learn about actually being honest. You're a theist. You're a creationist. Or maybe you'd like to say here and now that you don't believe that any supernatural-designer-creator-god(s) designed and created ('caused') this universe or anything in it? Hey, you can always claim that aliens-did-it. LOL

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Bob O'H



Posts: 2300
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 26 2015,06:52   

Updating the score card:
Having written, the Learned Hand no longer writes on at UD
Keith s is now Keith Sunk

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
Seversky



Posts: 442
Joined: June 2010

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 01 2015,23:27   

My login has just stopped working.   I am consigned to the Village of the Banned for a second time, no doubt to consider the error of my ways.

  
Henry J



Posts: 5135
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 02 2015,11:29   

Error?

Error... Error... Error... Must sterilize...

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1907
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 02 2015,13:25   

Timaeus over at UD made the following statement in response to Aurelio Smith:
Quote
I look forward to your refutation of my arguments in the earlier posts above — if you have one. But I no more expect you to be able to stay on topic than I would expect rvb, hrun, kohoutek, polistra, gmilling, Seversky or any of the others to have the spine — or the knowledge of science or theology — to defend their positions against my criticisms.

I like it. Accuse people who are incapable of responding due to being being banned by Barry of being spineless and stupid because they don't respond.

Timmie must have really dug deep for some of these names. I commented as gmilling until I was banned a few months ago.

  
REC



Posts: 638
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 02 2015,14:24   

Two posts from Barry have been up all day. They advance Barry's belief that his beliefs trump science, because duh Barry is so obviously right in all things.

Two posts. One comment. From "News."

  
Learned Hand



Posts: 214
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 02 2015,14:44   

Two posts. One comment. From "News."

Where is everybody?

  
Seversky



Posts: 442
Joined: June 2010

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 02 2015,17:53   

Quote
Where is everybody?


We're all here beyond:




of UD.  (Good picture of Bully Arrington)

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1907
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 02 2015,18:18   

Another GEM from Barry Arrogant:
Quote
This debate really has degenerated to StephenB courageously and patiently trying to reason with the materialists; only to be met repeatedly with the verbal equivalent of feces flinging. I don’t know why you subject yourself to this Stephen.


If, by feces (faeces, shit, poop, excrement) you mean rational argument, I agree with Barry. Why would StephenB continue to argue an indefensible point?

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1907
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 02 2015,20:09   

After Barry has posted two OPs with only a response from Dense, he has now posted a third that tries to draw the distinction between the chemicals that make up a human body, and the obvious (according to him) supernatural design that turns these chemicals into a person.

inane Barry crap

  
Henry J



Posts: 5135
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 02 2015,20:29   

Re "the distinction between the chemicals that make up a human body"

It's alimentary!

  
REC



Posts: 638
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 02 2015,23:20   

27 Barry Arrington February 2, 2015 at 11:12 pm
goodusername @ 26:

Thank you for at least trying to meet the substance of the OP. I’ve just deleted half a dozen thumb sucking, crybaby comments.

.....

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....iment-2

  
olegt



Posts: 1405
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 03 2015,08:20   

The ceiling voice is back and it is strong!

 
Quote
18 skram February 2, 2015 at 8:48 pm

Barry Arrington:
 
Quote
On materialist premises, a human being is nothing more than a somewhat sophisticated mixture of its constituent chemicals.

Let’s not pretend that this describes our position. However, in case you’ve been living under a rock, Barry, I will quote Nobel laureate Phil Anderson’s 1972 essay “More is different.”
 
Quote
The ability to reduce everything to simple fundamental laws does not imply the ability to start from those laws and reconstruct the universe. The constructionist hypothesis breaks down when confronted with the twin difficulties of scale and complexity. At each level of complexity entirely new properties appear. Psychology is not applied biology, nor is biology applied chemistry. We can now see that the whole becomes not merely more, but very different from the sum of its parts.

The essay can be easily found on the web. Until Barry and his friends read it and at least try to understand the main points, there is no reason to engage them.

UD Editors: Until skram and his friends admit that emergence (which is what is described in the quote) is nothing more than materialist mysticism trying to pass itself off as an intellectually respectable scientific account, there is no need to deal with them. Skram, you can run off and comfort yourself with your little stories. Do not expect those who demand plausible accounts to be impressed.

This morning skram has been silently banninated. Chalk this one up.

--------------
If you are not:
Galapagos Finch
please Logout

  
olegt



Posts: 1405
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 03 2015,08:23   

Barry scrubbed skram's further comments, but left out Joe's reply:
Quote

42 Joe February 3, 2015 at 6:27 am

skram:
Quote

Second, if you think that emergence is mysticism, please offer a straightforward, reductionist, no-emergence-involved account of the physical property called rigidity, i.e., the ability of solids to maintain shape.

Emergence is mysticism because it is used as such. Just because emergence works in some cases doesn’t mean it is universally applicable.


--------------
If you are not:
Galapagos Finch
please Logout

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 03 2015,09:12   

RIP, petrushka. Although not entirely silently.

It was interesting to have a final warning and bannation simultaneously.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
Lethean



Posts: 204
Joined: Jan. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 03 2015,12:24   



--------------
"So I'm a pretty unusual guy and it's not stupidity that has gotten me where I am. It's brilliance."

"My brain is one of the very few independent thinking brains that you've ever met. And that's a thing of wonder to you and since you don't understand it you criticize it."


~Dave Hawkins~

  
Henry J



Posts: 5135
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 03 2015,13:06   

For those who would like a magnetic personality but don't have it?

  
NoName



Posts: 2721
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 03 2015,13:14   

You're saying he's a magnetic no-no-pole?

I think that's giving him far too much credit, but what the heck.

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 03 2015,15:51   

It would appear that the improbability drive has returned us to normal, after a brief sojourn into Barry's alternate reality.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
  1072 replies since July 29 2007,19:21 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (36) < ... 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]