RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (121) < ... 93 94 95 96 97 [98] 99 100 101 102 103 ... >   
  Topic: Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed., Sternberg, Gonzalez, Crocker - A film< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Dr.GH



Posts: 2333
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2009,15:32   

Look Miller, your film was a load of shit. You are a dishonest hack at best.

Why would anyone miss you? I won't.

--------------
"Science is the horse that pulls the cart of philosophy."

L. Susskind, 2004 "SMOLIN VS. SUSSKIND: THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE"

   
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2009,15:52   

Quote (kevinmillerxi @ Jan. 17 2009,21:00)
Doc Bill:

You're right, there's a lot of character being revealed in this thread--yours included. But you do raise an interesting question: Why do I keep coming back here? I was asking myself the same thing last night. I guess it comes down to three things:

1) Plain, old curiosity. I don't know you people, so I'm not overly concerned with what you think about me or Expelled (I have my own thoughts on both subjects), but I'm always open to criticism (and some of what I've read here is certainly valid), and frankly, I'm always curious to hear what some of you will come up with next.

2) I love a challenge, and a few of you definitely provide that.

3) Something that really irked me during the time I worked on Expelled was the fact that people who occupied the various sides of this debate were more interested in hunkering down in their chosen corner and talking ABOUT the people who disagreed with them rather than actually trying to engage the other side(s). I identified this thread as one of those places where people were hunkering down, so I thought I'd crash the party. I realize that's never going to get me voted Mr. Popularity, but at least it gives me the satisfaction of knowing I'm not one of those people.

That said, there's only so many times we can go around the same Mulberry bush. So perhaps it's time I brought my sojourn here to an end. All in favor?

Kevvo,

I for one am not in favour of your departure if you have matters of substance to discuss.

Despite your apparent delusions to the contrary, hunkering down over a chosen corner is demonstrably hardly anything I'm interested in (see my chosen career: scientist, as opposed to someone who shits out delusional and inaccurate propaganda movies and thus aids liars). To be exceedingly blunt I'd love to credit you and IDCists the same benefit of the doubt, but to be even more blunt your own behaviour proves that you simply aren't interested. (Hello! Entire movie comparing working scientists to Nazis!) So your patronising (and erroneous) comments re: this thread are just an obnoxious parting barb.

I LOVE it when people like yourself try to pull the reasonable card, it's so blissfully self unaware. Look again at the comment you made that elicited my first reply. Look at your abject misunderstanding of the points made in my reply and my less than sympathetic elaboration of them. The bug up your arse is not that I/we are "hunkered down over a chosen corner" but that we have seen through the sham that IDC is, and through the surrounding shams that this manufactured "controversy" entails. You don't like that so you blame the messengers.

If there truly were a genuine controversy IDCIsts would have some data, some hard and fast meaningful research to argue with. They demonstrably don't. Most of their schtick is warmed over creationism, and the bits that aren't are merely wrong.

So cut the bullshit, cut the delusion that you are some insightful genius pricking the pompous comfort of some spurious party by gate crashing. You have yet to offer ANYTHING of substance. You instead choose to slander and libel working scientists who actually know what they are talking about in your wanton ignorance of the subject at hand.

Don't like that? Think it's a character assasination? Wrong, Kevvo. It's a simple matter of demonstrable fact. It might not be polite to (for example) tell a fat person that they are fat. But if said fat person attempts to model teeny tiny swimwear they cannot fit into, then at some point for their own good a quiet mention of their obesity needs to be made. When said fat person tries to have it declared nationwide that they are slimmer than Kate Moss, have this taught as fact in school science classes, and then  complains that anyone who (however delicately) points out their obesity is ideologically akin to the group of people responsible for the greatest genocidal tragedy in recorded human history, then don't be surprised if a few people break out the (intellectual and metaphorical) baseball bats and teach Mr Fatty a lesson. Your Emperor is naked, Kevvo. Don't blame us kids for pointing that out.

That said, I'll repeat: stay and offer something of substance and thus at least attempt an adult conversation, or continue whining, lying and defending the indefensible and thus be mocked unrelentingly. The choice, as ever, is yours and ONLY yours.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
jeffox



Posts: 671
Joined: Oct. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2009,16:48   

C'mon Kev-0, just give us all a general ballpark figure, say 6 or 7 figures?  Pretty big minus there, eh?  

Ha ha.

  
Reed



Posts: 274
Joined: Feb. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2009,17:25   

Quote (kevinmillerxi @ Jan. 17 2009,09:07)
But wouldn't it be simpler to admit that your Germany/Nazi analogy was inaccurate and that anonymous character assassination is your forte?

Don't you see even a tiny bit of hypocrisy here, given the content of your movie ?

You get such a strong reaction here (and from reality based folks everywhere) because your film was obviously a deliberately dishonest on reason, science and scientists everywhere, all with the transparently obvious goal of promoting a particular religious agenda.

Your continued insistence that it was something else just makes you look like a dishonest hack.

Have you ever noticed that pretty much the only people who said anything good about your movie were fundamentalists ? That almost all the promoters of ID have a fundamentalist Christian agenda ? That ID has produced no credible science ? Are you so deluded by your own agenda that you honestly think this is just a coincidence ?
     
Quote

Something that really irked me during the time I worked on Expelled was the fact that people who occupied the various sides of this debate were more interested in hunkering down in their chosen corner and talking ABOUT the people who disagreed with them rather than actually trying to engage the other side(s).

ID is an obvious front for a religious agenda. It has no evidence to support it, and clearly has no place in science. As long as ID supporters insisting that their bullshit should be considered science, rather than actually doing science, there is nothing for rational people to engage.

  
Doc Bill



Posts: 1039
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2009,17:25   

I do recall, Kev-0, if memory serves that we tried and tried and tried to engage you in a discussion about Expelled and the "expelled" and you refused to participate.

You see, we all know the biographies of the "expelled" and some of know these people personally.  So, we have some insight as to what really went on.

Dembski expelled?  No, he was removed as head of the Polanyi center for non-colleagic conduct by the same guy, pres of Baylor, who granted the charter.  Dembski kept his pay for the 5-year duration of the grant.  

Sternberg, as you well know, was not expelled by the Smithsonian because he didn't work for the Smithsonian.  He worked, and still does AFAIK, for the NIH has a data analyst.

Crocker wasn't expelled.  Her 1-year teaching contract ran out and it wasn't renewed.  You should be able to find hundreds of biology teachers whose contracts run out every year.  Crocker has had several contract jobs since, all ending, and recently was Exec. Director of the IDEA clubs, announced with some fanfare, but now not (with no fanfare.)

Behe, Wells, Seelke, Marks and others have university jobs.

Even Gonzalez wasn't expelled.  He didn't make tenure because he brought in about 1% of the grant money of his colleagues, published virtually nothing and graduated no advanced students.  He failed to measure up.  Seems he's employed by another college now, however.  Hardly expelled.

In an interview it was either Ruloff or Stein who said that the Expelled team had interviewed "hundreds" of scientists who had lost their jobs or grant money for getting involved with ID.  I don't believe that at all.  If it were true than at a minimum you'd have a scrolling credits of all the "expelled."  Seriously, if the poster boy for Expelled was Sternberg then you were in big trouble with your main thesis.

So, come on back and tell us all about what REALLY went on behind the scenes.  Oh, and tell us, really, when Stein was going around giving interviews and saying things like "Darwinism doesn't explain thermodynamics," did anybody cringe?  Weren't you at least a little embarrassed by that?

  
deejay



Posts: 113
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2009,17:26   

Quote (kevinmillerxi @ Jan. 17 2009,16:00)
2) I love a challenge, and a few of you definitely provide that.

Evidently the current challenge is reading for comprehension.  What follows is a little bit harder.

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2009,17:43   

Oh Brave Sir Kevin - PLEASE DON'T RUN AWAY!!!




--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2009,17:52   

Quote (Doc Bill @ Jan. 17 2009,18:25)
 Oh, and tell us, really, when Stein was going around giving interviews and saying things like "Darwinism doesn't explain thermodynamics," did anybody cringe?  Weren't you at least a little embarrassed by that?

I doubt Kevin knows enough to be embarrassed by that.

   
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2009,17:58   

Kevineleven, complaining about folks (here or elsewhere)  only focusing on "people" is a real hoot. Your POS film was entirely about people; there wasn't a lick of science in it!

If you wanna talk about science (or anything besides people), maybe you should try it first before you complain about others...

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
Doc Bill



Posts: 1039
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2009,19:09   

Quote
Oh, and tell us, really, when Stein was going around giving interviews and saying things like "Darwinism doesn't explain thermodynamics," did anybody cringe?  Weren't you at least a little embarrassed by that?


What killed me about Stein spouting off about that, and he did it several times, was that NOBODY said "what the FUCK?"

Stein also said that "Dawinism doesn't explain gravity."

Yeah, Stein, and germ theory doesn't explain red.

So, based on this statement, I would henceforth call Ben Stein a MORON and that would be "bad" because I'm assassinating his character and not addressing his argument.  However, his argument is MORONIC so what does that leave me with?

OK, Louis, I used "with" at the end of a sentence.  So, sue me.  Louis and I are only left with mockery because there is no avenue for discussion.

Creationists are morons.  I rest my case.

  
Ra-Úl



Posts: 93
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2009,19:40   

Quote (Doc Bill @ Jan. 17 2009,19:09)
So, based on this statement, I would henceforth call Ben Stein a MORON and that would be "bad" because I'm assassinating his character and not addressing his argument.  However, his argument is MORONIC so what does that leave me with?

OK, Louis, I used "with" at the end of a sentence.  So, sue me.  Louis and I are only left with mockery because there is no avenue for discussion.

Creationists are morons.  I rest my case.


Prepositional stranding is proper English. Ask Churchill. I know he's dead, but he's my authority on this.
As usual with my posts on grammar or spelling, I had to edit this one four times before posting.

--------------
Beauty is that which makes us desperate. - P Valery

  
Cubist



Posts: 558
Joined: Oct. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2009,20:01   

Mr. Miller, your character wasn't assassinated; it committed suicide. All we've done is conduct the autopsy.
You are a false witness, Mr. Miller. That waste of perfectly good celluloid which you call Expelled is a compendium of groundless whining, logical fallacies, libelous (or is it 'slanderous'? I can never remember which is spoken and which is written) attacks on people who have done nothing to merit such abuse, and blatant falsehoods. Every human being who bears any responsibility for the content of that waste of celluloid is, him- or herself, a false witness.
It's the Ninth Commandment, Mr. Miller, not the Ninth Suggestion.  I am given to understand that God doesn't much like false witnesses, Mr. Miller -- that, in fact, He has a lake of fire waiting for the likes of you in the afterlife. You may of course bear as much false witness as you like about anyone you like, Mr. Miller... but don't be surprised if, when you finally meet Jesus, you turn out to be one of those of whom He says, "I never knew ye."

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2009,21:41   

Well, it's 3:35 am ish here in the UK. I'm up and about for reasons I'd rather not go into, and I am distressingly sober.

Anyway, I thought, before I attempt sleep, that Kevvo would benefit from the words of Carl Sagan:

Quote
But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.


Words to live by, Kevvo.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Nomad



Posts: 311
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2009,21:59   

Quote (kevinmillerxi @ Jan. 17 2009,15:00)
2) I love a challenge, and a few of you definitely provide that.

Okay.  I challenge you to explain from what Sternberg was expelled from.  I know you've been asked that many times before without response, but perhaps it needs to be asked in the form of a challenge.

  
Quidam



Posts: 229
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 18 2009,11:40   

Quote (Doc Bill @ Jan. 11 2009,14:18)
Since we all know that nobody was "expelled" in Expelled, and that Kev-0's screenplay was a pack o' lies, if only they had waited a year they would have had a bone fide Expell-o-rama person.

Caroline Crocker.

No longer "executive director" of the IDEA clubs.  

Expelled!

By creationists.  Go figger.

I've updated Wikipedia.  

Quote
The Future of IDEA
In early 2008. Dr. Caroline Crocker became the first Executive Director of the IDEA Center. Dr. Crocker left the Center in the summer of 2008 to pursue other endeavors.

http://www.ideacenter.org/about/history.php

That has to be the ultimate bungee appointment.  Even allowing for the vagueness of 'early 2008' and 'summer of 2008'  that's at most four months.  

What did she do/not-do to be expelled/drop out like that?  

Does anyone know?  The Idea site is very coy.  "To pursue other interests" is usually a euphemism for "we fired her sorry ass for being a total Dembski"

--------------
The organized fossils ... and their localities also, may be understood by all, even the most illiterate. William Smith, Strata. 1816

  
Doc Bill



Posts: 1039
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 18 2009,12:18   

I think it was February through June.  Press releases, now mysteriously gone from the IDEA site (how (not) strange), announce her appointment in February and the new guy in June.

Hard to imagine.  Even Luskin can hold a creationist job!

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 18 2009,13:30   

Quote (Cubist @ Jan. 17 2009,21:01)
That waste of perfectly good celluloid which you call Expelled is a compendium of groundless whining, logical fallacies, libelous (or is it 'slanderous'? I can never remember which is spoken and which is written)

Libel is written defamation, slander is spoken. Mnemonic: libel can be read in the LIBrary.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
Texas Teach



Posts: 2084
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 18 2009,14:03   

Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Jan. 18 2009,13:30)
Quote (Cubist @ Jan. 17 2009,21:01)
That waste of perfectly good celluloid which you call Expelled is a compendium of groundless whining, logical fallacies, libelous (or is it 'slanderous'? I can never remember which is spoken and which is written)

Libel is written defamation, slander is spoken. Mnemonic: libel can be read in the LIBrary.

And Slander is Spoken.

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
deejay



Posts: 113
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 19 2009,10:39   

I'm also intrigued by the continuing saga of Caroline Crocker.  My speculative explanation for how she could fail where Casey Luskin succeeded is that she has her own agenda.

Crocker's web site lets you know that she'll deliver a canned creationist presentation for a mere $2000, plus travel expenses.  It's another grand if you want her to customize the Powerpoint.   I have no idea what sort of compensation the IDEA center director position entailed, but I believe the DI had Dembski down for a stipend in the range of $30K/year.  I believe there is some demand for Crocker's presentations, as her rates have been boosted significantly since I saw them posted a year or so ago.   Given a choice between doing something for the DI and making $7500 for "a weekend of four talks," the wallet is going to win that decision every time.  

The overriding theme of Crocker's website is a bizarre combination of narcissism, martyrdom and unabashed venality [edited to add: and, oh yeah, flat out dishonesty]. In her own way, she's even creepier than Dembski.  

Back to the thread, the issue of relative creepiness brings up this:  

From Kevin:
 
Quote
Something that really irked me during the time I worked on Expelled was the fact that people who occupied the various sides of this debate were more interested in hunkering down in their chosen corner and talking ABOUT the people who disagreed with them rather than actually trying to engage the other side(s).


If you're still reading, Kevin, I'll just reiterate that the act of engagement has been done.  We've seen Crocker's slides.  It's a shame that all your "research" has left you unable to see just how wretched these slides are.  The consequence of showing them, an unrenewed contract, is no worse that what many competent instructors face year in and year out.  

Crocker's "ideas", and of course they're not even vaguely her own, have been engaged and have been quickly found sorely wanting.  It's boring.  It's been done.  What's left is a discussion of "who in the hell would not only say this, but also put it in front of a college class?"  As the 1100+ pages of the UD thread, 300+ pages of the FTK thread and nearly 100 pages of this thread will attest, that discussion is a little bit more interesting.  It's interesting because there aren't clear answers.  Are these people dishonest?  Incompetent?  Both?  If so, how?  How can they be competent in other areas of life?

Or maybe they're not so competent in other areas of life.  After all, Crocker also has this to say of the Design of Life blog
 
Quote
A website specifically designed to keep students informed about the latest developments in ID and evolution. Maintained by Denyse O’Leary, a professional writer who understands ID and can communicate clearly.




Edited by Lou FCD on Jan. 19 2009,12:14

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 19 2009,10:54   

Quote (deejay @ Jan. 19 2009,10:39)
Or maybe they're not so competent in other areas of life.  After all, Crocker also has this to say of the Design of Life blog
 
Quote
A website specifically designed to keep students informed about the latest developments in ID and evolution. Maintained by Denyse O’Leary, a professional writer who understands ID and can communicate clearly.

OUTSTANDING CATCH!  

You have cited the perfect example of the efficacy, wit and wisdom of Caroline Crocker, and makes this my Post Of The Week for Today!

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
Quidam



Posts: 229
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 19 2009,10:54   

Quote (Texas Teach @ Jan. 18 2009,13:03)
Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Jan. 18 2009,13:30)
 
Quote (Cubist @ Jan. 17 2009,21:01)
That waste of perfectly good celluloid which you call Expelled is a compendium of groundless whining, logical fallacies, libelous (or is it 'slanderous'? I can never remember which is spoken and which is written)

Libel is written defamation, slander is spoken. Mnemonic: libel can be read in the LIBrary.

And Slander is Spoken.

And if someone is reading a script in a propaganda movie it's ...

?

May I suggest: Slimebel

--------------
The organized fossils ... and their localities also, may be understood by all, even the most illiterate. William Smith, Strata. 1816

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 19 2009,11:15   

The expelled video contest is going well

http://uk.youtube.com/group/academicfreedomday

Total of zero submissions so far.

Also the rules for the competition say

 
Quote
# Essays and videos submitted for the contest must be the original work of the student(s) entering the contest. Furthermore, video entries must not violate applicable copyright laws and only use images and audio that are in the public domain (or images and audio that the student has the legal right to use).


Imagine that.

http://www.academicfreedomday.com/actUp.php

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 19 2009,11:37   

No videos of fundie students burning evolution posters and banners? Where is their commitment?

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
noncarborundum



Posts: 320
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 19 2009,11:43   

Quote (deejay @ Jan. 19 2009,10:39)
Crocker's "ideas", and of course they're not even vaguely her own, have been engaged and have been quickly found sorely wanting.  It's boring.  It's been done.  What's left is a discussion of "who in the hell would not only say this, but also put it in front of a college class?"  As the 1100+ pages of the UD thread, 300+ pages of the FTK thread and nearly 100 pages of this thread will attest, that discussion is a little bit more interesting.  It's interesting because there aren't clear answers.  Are these people dishonest?  Incompetent?  Both?  If so, how?  How can they be competent in other areas of life?

Or maybe they're not so competent in other areas of life.  After all, Crocker also has this to say of the Design of Life blog
   
Quote
A website specifically designed to keep students informed about the latest developments in ID and evolution. Maintained by Denyse O’Leary, a professional writer who understands ID and can communicate clearly.


Exhibit B:  She claims to be writing a book called Expelled:  No Science Allowed, "to be published in 2008", and she describes it thus:

[QUOTE]Expelled: No Science Allowed is much like To Sir With Love becoming To Madam With Hate followed by a fairy tale ending of vindication by Hollywood.[I]

I was ready to rush right out (to amazon.com) and order a copy, but for some reason amazon knows nothing of Dr. Crocker's opus.

--------------
"The . . . um . . . okay, I was genetically selected for blue eyes.  I know there are brown eyes, because I've observed them, but I can't do it.  Okay?  So . . . um . . . coz that's real genetic selection, not the nonsense Giberson and the others are talking about." - DO'L

  
noncarborundum



Posts: 320
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 19 2009,11:49   

[quote=noncarborundum,Jan. 19 2009,11:43]
Quote
Expelled: No Science Allowed is much like To Sir With Love becoming To Madam With Hate followed by a fairy tale ending of vindication by Hollywood.[I]

O for an "edit" button.

--------------
"The . . . um . . . okay, I was genetically selected for blue eyes.  I know there are brown eyes, because I've observed them, but I can't do it.  Okay?  So . . . um . . . coz that's real genetic selection, not the nonsense Giberson and the others are talking about." - DO'L

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 19 2009,12:13   

Quote (noncarborundum @ Jan. 19 2009,11:49)
[quote=noncarborundum,Jan. 19 2009,11:43]  
Quote
Expelled: No Science Allowed is much like To Sir With Love becoming To Madam With Hate followed by a fairy tale ending of vindication by Hollywood.[I]

O for an "edit" button.

Give Gov Blogojevich a call, or send him a PM... I am sure he'll be able to get you one.

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
deejay



Posts: 113
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 19 2009,12:23   

To Lou and J-Dog:

Thanks a lot for the recognition!  I can't help but notice, though, how crowded the POTW room is, and it's only Monday afternoon.  Hmmm...

; )

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 19 2009,12:40   

Quote (deejay @ Jan. 19 2009,18:23)
To Lou and J-Dog:

Thanks a lot for the recognition!  I can't help but notice, though, how crowded the POTW room is, and it's only Monday afternoon.  Hmmm...

; )

POTW!!!!!

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 19 2009,15:40   

Quote (deejay @ Jan. 19 2009,12:23)
To Lou and J-Dog:

Thanks a lot for the recognition!  I can't help but notice, though, how crowded the POTW room is, and it's only Monday afternoon.  Hmmm...

; )

True, however, sometimes I go HOURS without nominating anyone for POTW!

When Teh Designer Inspires me, I must testify!

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
Marion Delgado



Posts: 89
Joined: Nov. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 19 2009,15:55   

It was a great film, as I said, left out the Davisonian counter theory.

However, it completely lived up to its title, unlike many science movies.

  
  3612 replies since Aug. 12 2007,07:23 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (121) < ... 93 94 95 96 97 [98] 99 100 101 102 103 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]