Joined: Sep. 2017
| I can't imagine how to better present what I have for a model/theory pertaining to the multicellular level intelligence to "peers".|
You can't imagine a better way to present your nonsense/woowoo to "peers", huh? Oh, if only there were a standardized process for reviewing someone's ideas by some peers from the appropriate fields. Maybe we could add strict regulations, to ensure errors can be corrected through this process, and scientific rigour is upheld as much as possible. That kind of review-process would possibly even be better than posting on a random blog/internet forum! Someone should try to implement something like that, would really help science out!
(...He's not gonna get it, is he?)
|In regards to understanding how our own mind works: from a perspective of each brain cell being way more intelligent (designer) than "scientists" ever imagined the progress made last weekend was a Stand By You moment even though it was for me explaining how something I have been experimenting with works, and some programming.|
Ohh, so much cringe. I am embarassed for you Gary, since you seem to be entirely incapable of enough self-reflection to see how pathetic you are. Get help!
|The Discovery Institute and Uncommon Descent are working towards their court-ordered psychological evaluation.|
I would like to point out that the discovery institute is one of the only citations you have in your nonsense pdf. And not in a way to refute it, or contrast it, no as the very foundation to your own woo-woo. Which is not surprising, because it's religiously inspired woo-woo. It started as mainstream creationism (I can still link you to reddit discussion, where you try to argue Casey Luskin, famous member of the DI, was right in his anti-scientific assertions), then somewhere along the way, your addled brain decided to arbitrarily reject the Discovery Institute, but refused to accept that this meant rejecting your whole pseudoscience, which was born from it. So you changed literally nothing about it, but pretended that it somehow was completely different...
"If you say that the Discovery Institute is talking about "God" then so am I. The only difference is they have a policy to leave how God works up to the imagination, I don't. " -Gary Gaulin, Jan. 25 2017
Now you have a bunch of nonsense, the content or message of which you yourself can't even summarize or explain to anyone, because it is so inherently inconsistent and nonsensical.