RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (21) < ... 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 >   
  Topic: Challenge to Evolutionists< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
jeannot



Posts: 1201
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2007,17:38   

Quote (IanBrown_101 @ Sep. 21 2007,09:26)
Looks like supes is a pariah now, like FtK.

I know he was annoying, but seriously, don't you think that was a bit hasty?

I may be missing something, but it looks quite unfair to me.
Paley has been trolling for more than a year before getting banned.

  
IanBrown_101



Posts: 927
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2007,17:41   

Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 21 2007,23:34)
Funny, I just got a private message from SS saying that he was banned.

At first, I was thinking of a stupid joke, then a noticed his group name "Pariah".

Was did he do?
Can he still post private messages?

EDIT: OK Ian.
Still, I'd like an explanation.

I wouldn't mind one. I mean, I know some of the things he said would have had us getting a round in with Ken Ham to discuss the loon in the corner, but still, he was only here for a couple of days.

--------------
I'm not the fastest or the baddest or the fatest.

You NEVER seem to address the fact that the grand majority of people supporting Darwinism in these on line forums and blogs are atheists. That doesn't seem to bother you guys in the least. - FtK

Roddenberry is my God.

   
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2007,17:42   

My hunch is this had something to do with it:

Quote
CARM's SS is a troll, pure and simple.  He told me privately that he  doesn't believe a word he posts, that it's all entertainment


--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
IanBrown_101



Posts: 927
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2007,17:44   

Quote (Arden Chatfield @ Sep. 21 2007,23:42)
My hunch is this had something to do with it:

Quote
CARM's SS is a troll, pure and simple.  He told me privately that he  doesn't believe a word he posts, that it's all entertainment

Didn't SS say he actually believed all he wrote, but jazzed it up a bit to get an extra rise?

I know it's a jackass thing to do, but still, Paley just made shit up and got awa with it for months.

--------------
I'm not the fastest or the baddest or the fatest.

You NEVER seem to address the fact that the grand majority of people supporting Darwinism in these on line forums and blogs are atheists. That doesn't seem to bother you guys in the least. - FtK

Roddenberry is my God.

   
jeannot



Posts: 1201
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2007,17:45   

Quote (IanBrown_101 @ Sep. 21 2007,17:41)
Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 21 2007,23:34)
Funny, I just got a private message from SS saying that he was banned.

At first, I was thinking of a stupid joke, then a noticed his group name "Pariah".

Was did he do?
Can he still post private messages?

EDIT: OK Ian.
Still, I'd like an explanation.

I wouldn't mind one. I mean, I know some of the things he said would have had us getting a round in with Ken Ham to discuss the loon in the corner, but still, he was only here for a couple of days.

Yes. And if we are to become like UD, at least he deserved some:

SS is no longer with us - Wes

or

SS, you're outta here, homo! - SteveS

;)

No kidding, what happened?

  
qetzal



Posts: 311
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2007,18:05   

I don't think ss should be a pariah either, unless he's done something I'm not aware of.

I think there's a good chance he's a troll, as alleged. If there's more evidence of that, I'd like to see it posted here. Even then, I wouldn't support this action. We can always choose to ignore him, and to date, I'm not aware that he's been disruptive on any other threads.

If he's done something more egregious than what we've seen on this thread, can the mods please explain?

If not, I respectfully request he be given back his posting priveleges.

Not because I think he's posting anything of value, but because I want this board to maintain the highest standards of tolerance. GOP was much more deserving of being banned, but wasn't. Let's please not stoop to UD's level in this case, either.

My $0.02.

  
fusilier



Posts: 249
Joined: Feb. 2003

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2007,19:02   

Quote (qetzal @ Sep. 21 2007,18:05)
I don't think ss should be a pariah either, unless he's done something I'm not aware of.

I think there's a good chance he's a troll, as alleged. If there's more evidence of that, I'd like to see it posted here. Even then, I wouldn't support this action. We can always choose to ignore him, and to date, I'm not aware that he's been disruptive on any other threads.

If he's done something more egregious than what we've seen on this thread, can the mods please explain?

If not, I respectfully request he be given back his posting priveleges.

Not because I think he's posting anything of value, but because I want this board to maintain the highest standards of tolerance. GOP was much more deserving of being banned, but wasn't. Let's please not stoop to UD's level in this case, either.

My $0.02.

I just got asked for details by the listmoms, I didn't make any decisions.  I do know that he's posted the exact same stuff at Richard Dawkins' official forum, and at umpty other places, and been banned elsewhere.

Here's an old "private message" from a year or so ago, at CARM.  It took me a while to dig it out, since that feature has been disabled.

[QUOTE=fusilier;1172951]  One chance to apologize, supersport.   I don't like to hide behind mods, so here's your opportunity to be a man and admit what you did is wrong.

fusilier
James 2:24[/QUOTE]

Oh lighten up fuzzy liar...I've been called lots worse on bulletin
boards, like stupidplurt and snotsport.  Its all a game anyway, I just
like to have fun at work waiting for phone calls.  coadie may believe
this crap, but I don't.

supersport
"The overwhelming prevalence of stasis became an embarrassing feature of the fossil record, best left ignored as a manifestation of nothing (that
is, nonevolution)."SJ Gould


fusilier
James :24

--------------
fusilier
James 2:24

  
skeptic



Posts: 1163
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,01:24   

still, I have to say I feel somewhat paranoid now.  I've never dreamed that getting banned was that easy.

  
jeannot



Posts: 1201
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,05:21   

Well, the troll came here to have fun pissing us off.

Looks like he deserved it.

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,15:51   

Two, four, six, eight
Let’s get on with this debate!

Was just released from the pariah fort
So I can cheer for Supersport!

So, stop your evasion...
or admit to creation.

This is what you’ve waited for
don’t you dare show him the door!
[Wes...see! I “substantiated that claim!!”]

I’ve found I seriously suck at rhyme
perhaps I should consider mime.
[copyright infringement...credit to Kristine]

Gooooooo Supersport!
[And, isn’t he a cutie?!]

YEAH!!!!



[Does seriously outstanding cheerleading jump (for a 42 yr. old)...

....arrrrggghhhhh*%##@ !!...

...lands on "expansive backside"]

Gosh darn it!  It’s, like, really difficult to do my jumps in these freaking heels, Richard Hughes!!!!

***She’s  baaaaaaccccccckkkkkkk!!---Wes released me from teh piranha pinata pimento pariah cage!***

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,16:07   

Quote (Ftk @ Sep. 22 2007,15:51)
So, stop your evasion...
or admit to creation.

Q: Who'd look at this thread and accuse the anti-SuperSport coalition of evasion?

A: Ftk.  :p

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,16:12   

HI OLDMAN!!

My golly gosh I've misssseeeedddd you!

*kisses**

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
jeannot



Posts: 1201
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,16:18   

What the heII?

SS banned without notice, and now Ftk is back!  :O

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,16:19   

Quote (Ftk @ Sep. 22 2007,16:12)
HI OLDMAN!!

My golly gosh I've misssseeeedddd you!

*kisses**

HEy! PLay fair  :D

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,16:20   

Hey Ftk,

This might be a great time for you to substantiate that my claim of question dodging is untrue.  Please take the requisite 3 seconds to show an example of supersport answering a question.  Examples of JoeG doing the same would be great as well (on his thread, of course).

You have made this claim that I am wrong.  In your new "show the evidence mode" I guess you'll now be showing me the proof?

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
Dr.GH



Posts: 2157
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,16:22   

I am going fishing for a few days.



--------------
"Science is the horse that pulls the cart of philosophy."

L. Susskind, 2004 "SMOLIN VS. SUSSKIND: THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE"

   
Nerull



Posts: 317
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,16:23   

Quote (Ftk @ Sep. 22 2007,15:51)
Two, four, six, eight
Let’s get on with this debate!

Was just released from the pariah fort
So I can cheer for Supersport!

So, stop your evasion...
or admit to creation.

This is what you’ve waited for
don’t you dare show him the door!
[Wes...see! I “substantiated that claim!!”]

I’ve found I seriously suck at rhyme
perhaps I should consider mime.
[copyright infringement...credit to Kristine]

Gooooooo Supersport!
[And, isn’t he a cutie?!]

YEAH!!!!



[Does seriously outstanding cheerleading jump (for a 42 yr. old)...

....arrrrggghhhhh*%##@ !!...

...lands on "expansive backside"]

Gosh darn it!  It’s, like, really difficult to do my jumps in these freaking heels, Richard Hughes!!!!

***She’s  baaaaaaccccccckkkkkkk!!---Wes released me from teh piranha pinata pimento pariah cage!***

I take it then, FTK, that you believe Newtonian gravity takes precedence over relativity, that E=MC^2 controls the maximum speed you can travel, and that *all* scientists are wicked evil atheists who are in a big conspiracy? (That includes your hero Brown).

--------------
To rebut creationism you pretty much have to be a biologist, chemist, geologist, philosopher, lawyer and historian all rolled into one. While to advocate creationism, you just have to be an idiot. -- tommorris

   
jeannot



Posts: 1201
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,16:23   

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums....0292361
So this is supersport?
He looks smarter than he is. You two are buddies, eh?

  
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,16:33   

Quote
I take it then, FTK, that you believe Newtonian gravity takes precedence over relativity, that E=MC^2 controls the maximum speed you can travel, and that *all* scientists are wicked evil atheists who are in a big conspiracy? (That includes your hero Brown).


She's open to all possibilities in these areas.  Including that E=MC^2 is the relationship between molasses cookies eaten by Santa and the number of floating forests Brown has lived on.

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
jeannot



Posts: 1201
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,16:37   

Quote (Ftk @ Sep. 22 2007,15:51)
Two, four, six, eight
Let’s get on with this debate!

Was just released from the pariah fort
So I can cheer for Supersport!

Too late.  :p

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,17:11   

Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 22 2007,16:23)
http://i17.photobucket.com/albums....0292361
So this is supersport?
He looks smarter than he is. You two are buddies, eh?

I don't know him personally...if you were paying attention, his picture was posted on this thread.

We did PM each other a couple times from the pariah cage.  That place seriously sucked!...stuffy, cold, lonely.

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,19:15   

Quote (blipey @ Sep. 22 2007,16:20)
Hey Ftk,

This might be a great time for you to substantiate that my claim of question dodging is untrue.  Please take the requisite 3 seconds to show an example of supersport answering a question.  Examples of JoeG doing the same would be great as well (on his thread, of course).

You have made this claim that I am wrong.  In your new "show the evidence mode" I guess you'll now be showing me the proof?

Blipster, just because you don't like or agree with a person's answer doesn't mean they didn't give one.

And, dude, I am all about substantiation this time around.  Here are just some of his answers...

Here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here

Now, here is what I want to know.  Why was he banned??  Isn't it Wes who made the "I'm with the banned" buttons?  Don't you guys complain *all the time* about Davescots banning policy?  What the heck is going on around here?

Wes, are you going to address this, or are you going to pull a Lilley??

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
hooligans



Posts: 114
Joined: Jan. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,19:44   

Hey Ftk ,

Can youfind out what Dembski's take on his pantsing at OU is?

Thanks

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,20:12   

Quote (hooligans @ Sep. 22 2007,19:44)
Hey Ftk ,

Can youfind out what Dembski's take on his pantsing at OU is?

Thanks

I find it a bit odd that you guys are so interested in the OU lecture.  It's not like it's the first he's done.  Shoot, I attended his lecture at KU last year.  Darwinists lined up in droves at the mic that time as well.  Dembski didn't blog about that lecture either that I remember.  

Does he blog about every speaking engagement?

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11109
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,20:18   

FTK IZ BAK CUZ MI FAIRY MOANS HAS A FLAVOURS.



K BAI.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,20:21   

[blushing]

Hi Richard... :)  

[/blushing]

[swoons]

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11109
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,20:39   

Hottie_dressed_as_teh_sexi_nurse sez:

Quote
I find it a bit odd that you guys are so interested in the OU lecture


Hopefully ERV will have her audio up soon, so we can all "consider the evidence"

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
carlsonjok



Posts: 3324
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,20:40   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Sep. 22 2007,20:18)
FTK IZ BAK CUZ MI FAIRY MOANS HAS A FLAVOURS.



K BAI.

HAR HAR HAR. THIS IS YOU.


--------------
It's natural to be curious about our world, but the scientific method is just one theory about how to best understand it.  We live in a democracy, which means we should treat every theory equally. - Steven Colbert, I Am America (and So Can You!)

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11109
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,20:47   

SHUT UP LOOSER. HAR HAR THIS IS YOU


IZ YOU BIN RIDED BI A MIDGET?

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2007,21:19   

Quote (Ftk @ Sep. 22 2007,19:15)
   
Quote (blipey @ Sep. 22 2007,16:20)
Hey Ftk,

This might be a great time for you to substantiate that my claim of question dodging is untrue.  Please take the requisite 3 seconds to show an example of supersport answering a question.  Examples of JoeG doing the same would be great as well (on his thread, of course).

You have made this claim that I am wrong.  In your new "show the evidence mode" I guess you'll now be showing me the proof?

Blipster, just because you don't like or agree with a person's answer doesn't mean they didn't give one.

And, dude, I am all about substantiation this time around.  Here are just some of his answers...

Here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here

Baloney. Answers which are just opinions, unsupported by facts, are NOT answers, even "this time around". Click on those 9 links and you find that sporty's answers were, in reality

#1- a bald-faced assertion unsupported by evidence
#2 - answering a question by posing another question, which was not an answer
#3 - an opinion, later shown to be complete bs
#4 - a busted link, perhaps you copied the URL wrong
#5 - an opinion that a dinosaur fossil is 6.8 thousand years old, unsupported by evidence
#6 - an opinion, later debunked
#7 - a quotemine of an article, which was shown not to back up his assertion at all
#8 - same bs as #7, repeated for comic effect?
#9 - a bunch of bs which avoided an actual answer

Furthermore, he avoided ever backing up his claim that mental processes can generate life instantly, even though he was asked about this at least 9 or 10 times.

Sounds like your kind of guy.

Welcome back.

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
  603 replies since Sep. 17 2007,22:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (21) < ... 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]