Joined: April 2007
|Quote (GaryGaulin @ Mar. 27 2018,17:09)|
|Quote (Texas Teach @ Mar. 27 2018,15:59)|
|Quote (GaryGaulin @ Mar. 27 2018,07:12)|
|I have to make it clear that I do not represent the Discovery Institute or their associates, and they certainly do not represent me. |
The theory of ID I wrote in order to show what a (from their premise) scientific theory looks like is still getting enough hits, from where it's at right now. Between my day job not paying much more than minimum wage and the computer model having become a priority to at least finish up enough to put online: all other projects are on hold, maybe forever.
But, as we keep telling you, their premise is wrong and/or nonsense. So everything you try to build from it is crap.......
Like it or not the premise/hypothesis tests true like this:
|The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, whereby the behavior of matter/energy powers a coexisting trinity of systematically self-similar (in each others image, likeness) intelligent “trial and error” learning systems at the genetic/molecular, cellular and multicellular level. This process includes both single cell zygote to human development that occurred in our own lifetime, and the very long ago first emergence/origin on this planet of molecular, cellular, then multicellular level intelligence.|
Behavior from a system or a device qualifies as intelligent by meeting all four circuit requirements that are required for this ability, which are: (1) A body to control, either real or virtual, with motor muscle(s) including molecular actuators, motor proteins, speakers (linear actuator), write to a screen (arm actuation), motorized wheels (rotary actuator). It is possible for biological intelligence to lose control of body muscles needed for movement yet still be aware of what is happening around itself but this is a condition that makes it impossible to survive on its own and will normally soon perish. (2) Random Access Memory (RAM) addressed by its sensory sensors where each motor action and its associated confidence value are stored as separate data elements. (3) Confidence (central hedonic) system that increments the confidence level of successful motor actions and decrements the confidence value of actions that fail to meet immediate needs. (4) Ability to guess a new memory action when associated confidence level sufficiently decreases. For flagella powered cells a random guess response is designed into the motor system by the reversing of motor direction causing it to “tumble” towards a new heading.
Those who think that it's no big deal are unfamiliar with the unforgiving ways of science. The worse is when someone who believes they never mix science and religion does not hesitate to do so, right after "creationists" taught them how.
You're no better than the ones you blame.
Like I said, utter crap.
And you still don’t show others the respect of learning to write in English.
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr
"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin