Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > Joe G.'s Tardgasm

Pages: (919) < ... 408 409 410 411 412 [413] 414 415 416 417 418 ... >

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,09:57    For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters That is a fact -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,09:58    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,17:53) Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 20 2018,09:52) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,17:50)   Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 20 2018,09:49)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,17:45) I provided references that demonstrate the two are INTERCHANGEABLE in certain contexts. And anyone who isn't a total moron could easily see the context cited is the same as the context used, ie you can talk about the wavelength or the frequency but you are still talking about a species of infrared. 6 of one/ half dozen of the other. Different numerical representations of the same wave. A reference as you well know must be valid and pertinant. What you have provided is a regulatory guide for the use of the Amateur radio bands which do not carry any reference to the relationship between frequency and wavelenght. ASYOUWELLKNOWCOCKFACEDICKMOUTH The reference I provided is valid and pertinent. And it does show the relationship between frequency and wavelength. It shows that the two are interchangeable in certain contexts. Peer review anyone? OK let's see your peer-review that refutes my claim. Or shut the fuck up. Joe THIS IS your peer review. Care to give yourself a score out 10? Keep in mind that should include an honest *giggle* score from all the other successfull posts on other blogs. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,09:59    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,17:57) For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters That is a fact So you are saying distance = 1/time? -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,10:00    Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 20 2018,09:58) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,17:53) Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 20 2018,09:52)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,17:50)   Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 20 2018,09:49)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,17:45) I provided references that demonstrate the two are INTERCHANGEABLE in certain contexts. And anyone who isn't a total moron could easily see the context cited is the same as the context used, ie you can talk about the wavelength or the frequency but you are still talking about a species of infrared. 6 of one/ half dozen of the other. Different numerical representations of the same wave. A reference as you well know must be valid and pertinant. What you have provided is a regulatory guide for the use of the Amateur radio bands which do not carry any reference to the relationship between frequency and wavelenght. ASYOUWELLKNOWCOCKFACEDICKMOUTH The reference I provided is valid and pertinent. And it does show the relationship between frequency and wavelength. It shows that the two are interchangeable in certain contexts. Peer review anyone? OK let's see your peer-review that refutes my claim. Or shut the fuck up. Joe THIS IS your peer review. Care to give yourself a score out 10? Keep in mind that should include an honest *giggle* score from all the other successfull posts on other blogs. You are too stupid and ignorant to be my peer. You are too stupid and ignorant to actually make a case. You are too stupid and ignorant to understand English. And you are too stupid and ignorant to understand the following fact: For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters That is a fact -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,10:00    Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 20 2018,09:59) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,17:57) For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters That is a fact So you are saying distance = 1/time? No, only a desperate moron would ask such a question. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,10:01    I provided references that demonstrate the two are INTERCHANGEABLE in certain contexts. And anyone who isn't a total moron could easily see the context cited is the same as the context used, ie you can talk about the wavelength or the frequency but you are still talking about a species of infrared. 6 of one/ half dozen of the other. Different numerical representations of the same wave. For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

JohnW Posts: 3217 Joined: Aug. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,10:03    Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 20 2018,07:42) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,17:24) Quote (fnxtr @ Mar. 20 2018,09:23) So, 160m=anywhere from 1800 to 2000 KHz? :-/ That is what the reference states. Take it up with Wikipedia. Joe why don't you just point him to the formulae? Or a reference that doesn't have the word Amateur in it? Joe "Amateur" unelectable dog catcher. In Joephysics, f = λ,  but v is only kinda sorta f λ . -------------- Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,10:07    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:00) For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters That is a fact Not underwater it isn't, dumbass   Quote About Janus JANUS is an open-source robust signaling method for underwater communications, freely distributed under the GNU General Public License version 3(external link). JANUS has been developed at the Centre for Maritime Research and Experimentation (CMRE)(external link) with the collaboration of academia, industry and government with the intention of creating an inter-operable communications standard. JANUS performance has so far been evaluated by many collaborating partners at centre frequencies from 900 Hz - 60 kHz and over distances up to 28 kilometers in waters all over the world. link Major league dumbass. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,10:08    Quote (JohnW @ Mar. 20 2018,10:03) Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 20 2018,07:42) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,17:24)   Quote (fnxtr @ Mar. 20 2018,09:23) So, 160m=anywhere from 1800 to 2000 KHz? :-/ That is what the reference states. Take it up with Wikipedia. Joe why don't you just point him to the formulae? Or a reference that doesn't have the word Amateur in it? Joe "Amateur" unelectable dog catcher. In Joephysics, f = λ,  but v is only kinda sorta f λ . Why are you such a desperate little faggot, John? -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,10:10    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2018,10:07) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:00) For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters That is a fact Not underwater it isn't, dumbass   Quote About Janus JANUS is an open-source robust signaling method for underwater communications, freely distributed under the GNU General Public License version 3(external link). JANUS has been developed at the Centre for Maritime Research and Experimentation (CMRE)(external link) with the collaboration of academia, industry and government with the intention of creating an inter-operable communications standard. JANUS performance has so far been evaluated by many collaborating partners at centre frequencies from 900 Hz - 60 kHz and over distances up to 28 kilometers in waters all over the world. link Major league dumbass. What a total desperate asshole you are, timmy. Is the atmosphere under water? That is the CONTEXT of the discussion- CO2 in the atmosphere Grow up -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,10:12    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2018,10:07) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:00) For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters That is a fact Not underwater it isn't, dumbass   Quote About Janus JANUS is an open-source robust signaling method for underwater communications, freely distributed under the GNU General Public License version 3(external link). JANUS has been developed at the Centre for Maritime Research and Experimentation (CMRE)(external link) with the collaboration of academia, industry and government with the intention of creating an inter-operable communications standard. JANUS performance has so far been evaluated by many collaborating partners at centre frequencies from 900 Hz - 60 kHz and over distances up to 28 kilometers in waters all over the world. link Major league dumbass. Too bad 900-60kHz is NOT 1800–2000 kHz -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,10:14    I provided references that demonstrate the two are INTERCHANGEABLE in certain contexts. And anyone who isn't a total moron could easily see the context cited is the same as the context used, ie you can talk about the wavelength or the frequency but you are still talking about a species of infrared. 6 of one/ half dozen of the other. Different numerical representations of the same wave. For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,10:18    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:12)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2018,10:07)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:00) For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters That is a fact Not underwater it isn't, dumbass       Quote About Janus JANUS is an open-source robust signaling method for underwater communications, freely distributed under the GNU General Public License version 3(external link). JANUS has been developed at the Centre for Maritime Research and Experimentation (CMRE)(external link) with the collaboration of academia, industry and government with the intention of creating an inter-operable communications standard. JANUS performance has so far been evaluated by many collaborating partners at centre frequencies from 900 Hz - 60 kHz and over distances up to 28 kilometers in waters all over the world. link Major league dumbass. Too bad 900-60kHz is NOT 1800–2000 kHz Joke now says from 900-60kHz frequency does not equal wavelength.   Major league dumbass. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,10:20    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,18:14) I provided references that demonstrate the two are INTERCHANGEABLE in certain contexts. And anyone who isn't a total moron could easily see the context cited is the same as the context used, ie you can talk about the wavelength or the frequency but you are still talking about a species of infrared. 6 of one/ half dozen of the other. Different numerical representations of the same wave. For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters oooooh bold type!!!!! -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,10:24    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2018,10:18) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:12)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2018,10:07)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:00) For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters That is a fact Not underwater it isn't, dumbass       Quote About Janus JANUS is an open-source robust signaling method for underwater communications, freely distributed under the GNU General Public License version 3(external link). JANUS has been developed at the Centre for Maritime Research and Experimentation (CMRE)(external link) with the collaboration of academia, industry and government with the intention of creating an inter-operable communications standard. JANUS performance has so far been evaluated by many collaborating partners at centre frequencies from 900 Hz - 60 kHz and over distances up to 28 kilometers in waters all over the world. link Major league dumbass. Too bad 900-60kHz is NOT 1800–2000 kHz Joke now says from 900-60kHz frequency does not equal wavelength.  :D Major league dumbass. So you are a desperate loser. As if I needed more evidence. The frequency from 900-60KHz has corresponding wavelengths. Transmitting on a frequency of 900-60KHz is the same as transmitting on those wavelengths. Duh -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,10:25    Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 20 2018,10:20) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,18:14) I provided references that demonstrate the two are INTERCHANGEABLE in certain contexts. And anyone who isn't a total moron could easily see the context cited is the same as the context used, ie you can talk about the wavelength or the frequency but you are still talking about a species of infrared. 6 of one/ half dozen of the other. Different numerical representations of the same wave. For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters oooooh bold type!!!!! Yes and you still ignore it as if your ignorance means something -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,10:25    I provided references that demonstrate the two are INTERCHANGEABLE in certain contexts. And anyone who isn't a total moron could easily see the context cited is the same as the context used, ie you can talk about the wavelength or the frequency but you are still talking about a species of infrared. 6 of one/ half dozen of the other. Different numerical representations of the same wave. For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,11:29    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,18:24) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2018,10:18)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:12)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2018,10:07)       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:00) For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters That is a fact Not underwater it isn't, dumbass         Quote About Janus JANUS is an open-source robust signaling method for underwater communications, freely distributed under the GNU General Public License version 3(external link). JANUS has been developed at the Centre for Maritime Research and Experimentation (CMRE)(external link) with the collaboration of academia, industry and government with the intention of creating an inter-operable communications standard. JANUS performance has so far been evaluated by many collaborating partners at centre frequencies from 900 Hz - 60 kHz and over distances up to 28 kilometers in waters all over the world. link Major league dumbass. Too bad 900-60kHz is NOT 1800–2000 kHz Joke now says from 900-60kHz frequency does not equal wavelength.  :D Major league dumbass. So you are a desperate loser. As if I needed more evidence. The frequency from 900-60KHz has corresponding wavelengths. Transmitting on a frequency of 900-60KHz is the same as transmitting on those wavelengths. Duh News flash for Joetard followers. Wavelength out of equivalence transmission in. In a mid morning physics coup Wavelenght looses numerical represenatation now frequency= transmission. Joe nonchalantly moves goal posts on the Joetard equivalence sandpit. Keep tuning in for moar shifting sands, meltdowns and dummy spits. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,11:38    Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 20 2018,11:29) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,18:24)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2018,10:18)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:12)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2018,10:07)       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:00) For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters That is a fact Not underwater it isn't, dumbass           Quote About Janus JANUS is an open-source robust signaling method for underwater communications, freely distributed under the GNU General Public License version 3(external link). JANUS has been developed at the Centre for Maritime Research and Experimentation (CMRE)(external link) with the collaboration of academia, industry and government with the intention of creating an inter-operable communications standard. JANUS performance has so far been evaluated by many collaborating partners at centre frequencies from 900 Hz - 60 kHz and over distances up to 28 kilometers in waters all over the world. link Major league dumbass. Too bad 900-60kHz is NOT 1800–2000 kHz Joke now says from 900-60kHz frequency does not equal wavelength.  :D Major league dumbass. So you are a desperate loser. As if I needed more evidence. The frequency from 900-60KHz has corresponding wavelengths. Transmitting on a frequency of 900-60KHz is the same as transmitting on those wavelengths. Duh News flash for Joetard followers. Wavelength out of equivalence transmission in. In a mid morning physics coup Wavelenght looses numerical represenatation now frequency= transmission. Joe nonchalantly moves goal posts on the Joetard equivalence sandpit. Keep tuning in for moar shifting sands, meltdowns and dummy spits. I provided references that demonstrate the two are INTERCHANGEABLE in certain contexts. And anyone who isn't a total moron could easily see the context cited is the same as the context used, ie you can talk about the wavelength or the frequency but you are still talking about a species of infrared. 6 of one/ half dozen of the other. Different numerical representations of the same wave. For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,11:38    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:24)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2018,10:18)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:12)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2018,10:07)       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:00) For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters That is a fact Not underwater it isn't, dumbass           Quote About Janus JANUS is an open-source robust signaling method for underwater communications, freely distributed under the GNU General Public License version 3(external link). JANUS has been developed at the Centre for Maritime Research and Experimentation (CMRE)(external link) with the collaboration of academia, industry and government with the intention of creating an inter-operable communications standard. JANUS performance has so far been evaluated by many collaborating partners at centre frequencies from 900 Hz - 60 kHz and over distances up to 28 kilometers in waters all over the world. link Major league dumbass. Too bad 900-60kHz is NOT 1800–2000 kHz Joke now says from 900-60kHz frequency does not equal wavelength.   Major league dumbass. So you are a desperate loser. As if I needed more evidence. The frequency from 900-60KHz has corresponding wavelengths. Transmitting on a frequency of 900-60KHz is the same as transmitting on those wavelengths. Duh OK Joke, what is the wavelength of a signal transmitted at 60 kHz?   Since with JokePhysics frequency always equals wavelength it should be easy for you to provide the one answer. Major league dumbass. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,11:44    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2018,11:38) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:24)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2018,10:18)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:12)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2018,10:07)         Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:00) For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters That is a fact Not underwater it isn't, dumbass           Quote About Janus JANUS is an open-source robust signaling method for underwater communications, freely distributed under the GNU General Public License version 3(external link). JANUS has been developed at the Centre for Maritime Research and Experimentation (CMRE)(external link) with the collaboration of academia, industry and government with the intention of creating an inter-operable communications standard. JANUS performance has so far been evaluated by many collaborating partners at centre frequencies from 900 Hz - 60 kHz and over distances up to 28 kilometers in waters all over the world. link Major league dumbass. Too bad 900-60kHz is NOT 1800–2000 kHz Joke now says from 900-60kHz frequency does not equal wavelength.  :D Major league dumbass. So you are a desperate loser. As if I needed more evidence. The frequency from 900-60KHz has corresponding wavelengths. Transmitting on a frequency of 900-60KHz is the same as transmitting on those wavelengths. Duh OK Joke, what is the wavelength of a signal transmitted at 60 kHz?   Since with JokePhysics frequency always equals wavelength it should be easy for you to provide the one answer. Major league dumbass. Transmitted where? Major league desperate loser -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,11:45    I provided references that demonstrate the two are INTERCHANGEABLE in certain contexts. And anyone who isn't a total moron could easily see the context cited is the same as the context used, ie you can talk about the wavelength or the frequency but you are still talking about a species of infrared. 6 of one/ half dozen of the other. Different numerical representations of the same wave. For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

fnxtr Posts: 3504 Joined: June 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,13:02    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,09:45) I provided references that demonstrate the two are INTERCHANGEABLE in certain contexts. And anyone who isn't a total moron could easily see the context cited is the same as the context used, ie you can talk about the wavelength or the frequency but you are still talking about a species of infrared. 6 of one/ half dozen of the other. Different numerical representations of the same wave. For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters Why do you always omit context until they hold your feet to the fire, Jojo? Then you say "I meant in certain contexts". It makes it look like you're backpedalling...which of course you're not... -------------- "[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory "Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,13:55    Quote (fnxtr @ Mar. 20 2018,13:02) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,09:45) I provided references that demonstrate the two are INTERCHANGEABLE in certain contexts. And anyone who isn't a total moron could easily see the context cited is the same as the context used, ie you can talk about the wavelength or the frequency but you are still talking about a species of infrared. 6 of one/ half dozen of the other. Different numerical representations of the same wave. For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters Why do you always omit context until they hold your feet to the fire, Jojo? Then you say "I meant in certain contexts". It makes it look like you're backpedalling...which of course you're not... Why can't you just make your case? Are you that much of a coward to actually say something that can be checked against reality? Context matters in every discussion. That is how we know which definition of the words used is relevant. In the context of global warming and the radiation frequency/ wavelength of the ground and atmospheric gasses, underwater transmissions are irrelevant. You can talk of the infrared radiation in terms of frequency or wavelength. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Acartia_Bogart Posts: 2927 Joined: Sep. 2014 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,14:24    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,11:45) I provided references that demonstrate the two are INTERCHANGEABLE in certain contexts. And anyone who isn't a total moron could easily see the context cited is the same as the context used, ie you can talk about the wavelength or the frequency but you are still talking about a species of infrared. 6 of one/ half dozen of the other. Different numerical representations of the same wave. For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters Be sure to strap that roof tightly to your head. I hear that it calls for rain.

Henry J Posts: 5786 Joined: Mar. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,14:50    If a transmission Hz too much, take two aspirin...

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,14:52    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,11:44)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2018,11:38)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:24)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2018,10:18)         Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:12)           Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2018,10:07)             Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,10:00) For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters That is a fact Not underwater it isn't, dumbass               Quote About Janus JANUS is an open-source robust signaling method for underwater communications, freely distributed under the GNU General Public License version 3(external link). JANUS has been developed at the Centre for Maritime Research and Experimentation (CMRE)(external link) with the collaboration of academia, industry and government with the intention of creating an inter-operable communications standard. JANUS performance has so far been evaluated by many collaborating partners at centre frequencies from 900 Hz - 60 kHz and over distances up to 28 kilometers in waters all over the world. link Major league dumbass. Too bad 900-60kHz is NOT 1800–2000 kHz Joke now says from 900-60kHz frequency does not equal wavelength.   Major league dumbass. So you are a desperate loser. As if I needed more evidence. The frequency from 900-60KHz has corresponding wavelengths. Transmitting on a frequency of 900-60KHz is the same as transmitting on those wavelengths. Duh OK Joke, what is the wavelength of a signal transmitted at 60 kHz?   Since with JokePhysics frequency always equals wavelength it should be easy for you to provide the one answer. Major league dumbass. Transmitted where? Major league desperate loser According to your dumbass it doesn't matter since you claim frequency always equals wavelength. No surprise your major league dumbass twists and squirms and dodges the question. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

fnxtr Posts: 3504 Joined: June 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,14:59    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,11:55) Quote (fnxtr @ Mar. 20 2018,13:02) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,09:45) I provided references that demonstrate the two are INTERCHANGEABLE in certain contexts. And anyone who isn't a total moron could easily see the context cited is the same as the context used, ie you can talk about the wavelength or the frequency but you are still talking about a species of infrared. 6 of one/ half dozen of the other. Different numerical representations of the same wave. For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters Why do you always omit context until they hold your feet to the fire, Jojo? Then you say "I meant in certain contexts". It makes it look like you're backpedalling...which of course you're not... Why can't you just make your case? Are you that much of a coward to actually say something that can be checked against reality? Context matters in every discussion. That is how we know which definition of the words used is relevant. In the context of global warming and the radiation frequency/ wavelength of the ground and atmospheric gasses, underwater transmissions are irrelevant. You can talk of the infrared radiation in terms of frequency or wavelength. (shrug) OK. As the link explains, 160m is the length of the antenna for the *average* frequency of broadcasts in that range. in real life, again as the link explains, "Wavelength=300/ Frequency in MHZ" so if wavelength and frequency are interchangeable and wavelength=300/frequency(MHz) then frequency=300/frequency so 1=300. Joemath. -------------- "[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory "Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

JohnW Posts: 3217 Joined: Aug. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,15:11    Quote (fnxtr @ Mar. 20 2018,12:59) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,11:55)   Quote (fnxtr @ Mar. 20 2018,13:02)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,09:45) I provided references that demonstrate the two are INTERCHANGEABLE in certain contexts. And anyone who isn't a total moron could easily see the context cited is the same as the context used, ie you can talk about the wavelength or the frequency but you are still talking about a species of infrared. 6 of one/ half dozen of the other. Different numerical representations of the same wave. For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters Why do you always omit context until they hold your feet to the fire, Jojo? Then you say "I meant in certain contexts". It makes it look like you're backpedalling...which of course you're not... Why can't you just make your case? Are you that much of a coward to actually say something that can be checked against reality? Context matters in every discussion. That is how we know which definition of the words used is relevant. In the context of global warming and the radiation frequency/ wavelength of the ground and atmospheric gasses, underwater transmissions are irrelevant. You can talk of the infrared radiation in terms of frequency or wavelength. (shrug) OK. As the link explains, 160m is the length of the antenna for the *average* frequency of broadcasts in that range. in real life, again as the link explains, "Wavelength=300/ Frequency in MHZ" so if wavelength and frequency are interchangeable and wavelength=300/frequency(MHz) then frequency=300/frequency so 1=300. Joemath. Oops... if wavelength and frequency are interchangeable and wavelength=300/frequency(MHz) then frequency=300/frequency so 1=300. then frequency^^2=300 so frequency=17.32 All frequencies are 17.32MHz in Joephysics, just like all velocities are 0.5. I predict that fnxtr, being an adult, will not respond to this with whining, swearing and homophobia. -------------- Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

Acartia_Bogart Posts: 2927 Joined: Sep. 2014 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 20 2018,15:23    Quote (fnxtr @ Mar. 20 2018,14:59) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,11:55) Quote (fnxtr @ Mar. 20 2018,13:02)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,09:45) I provided references that demonstrate the two are INTERCHANGEABLE in certain contexts. And anyone who isn't a total moron could easily see the context cited is the same as the context used, ie you can talk about the wavelength or the frequency but you are still talking about a species of infrared. 6 of one/ half dozen of the other. Different numerical representations of the same wave. For example- Transmitting on a frequency of  1800–2000 kHz = transmitting on a wavelength of 160 meters Why do you always omit context until they hold your feet to the fire, Jojo? Then you say "I meant in certain contexts". It makes it look like you're backpedalling...which of course you're not... Why can't you just make your case? Are you that much of a coward to actually say something that can be checked against reality? Context matters in every discussion. That is how we know which definition of the words used is relevant. In the context of global warming and the radiation frequency/ wavelength of the ground and atmospheric gasses, underwater transmissions are irrelevant. You can talk of the infrared radiation in terms of frequency or wavelength. (shrug) OK. As the link explains, 160m is the length of the antenna for the *average* frequency of broadcasts in that range. in real life, again as the link explains, "Wavelength=300/ Frequency in MHZ" so if wavelength and frequency are interchangeable and wavelength=300/frequency(MHz) then frequency=300/frequency so 1=300. Joemath. He still hasn't explained how context has anything to do with the claim that wavelength = frequency. 1) A vasectomy will prevent you from having kids. 2) Standing at ground zero of a nuclear explosion will prevent you from having kids. 3) Being hideously ugly and smelly will prevent you from having kids. By JoeMath, this means that vasectomy = Nuclear blast = Ugly and smelly.

Pages: (919) < ... 408 409 410 411 412 [413] 414 415 416 417 418 ... >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard