RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < ... 142 143 144 145 146 [147] 148 149 150 151 152 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: May 21 2012,07:55   

Quote (OgreMkV @ May 21 2012,05:37)
 
Quote (The whole truth @ May 21 2012,07:33)
Might as well face it, IDiots are addicted to tard.

I don't think IDiots are addicted to tard.  I think that we are addicted to tard.

IDiots just generate it.  It's like breathing... or more like excrement... they can't help it.  Random tard just flows from them like...

nevermind, the images I'm getting are too disgusting to continue with.


I was having a little fun with the picture that k.e. posted.  

See this:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=....vKUvm6A

I'd say that IDiots are addicted to tard, and that we are just pointing that out. I get your drift though.  :)




Edited to correct attribution to k.e.

Edited by The whole truth on May 21 2012,05:59

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
CeilingCat



Posts: 2162
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 22 2012,03:33   

JLT writes:        
Quote
Not to forget Dembski's change of mind, out of his own free will:
       
Quote
At that meeting, Dembski was quick to admit that he was wrong about the flood, Patterson said. “Had I had any inkling that Dr. Dembski was actually denying the absolute trustworthiness of the Bible, then that would have, of course, ended his relationship with the school,” he said.

Not that that bit of obsequious toadying saved his job or anything ...

Still, his new place of employment has a really handsome parking lot with freshly painted lines, so it's still a career advancement of sorts.

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 22 2012,07:47   

Joe so ronery:


--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
k.e..



Posts: 4882
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 22 2012,08:35   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ May 22 2012,15:47)
Joe so ronery:

In keeping with ID's image of a defunct 80's band Joe reminds me of these guys



Pseudo Echo Living in a Dream

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
Patrick



Posts: 638
Joined: July 2011

(Permalink) Posted: May 22 2012,08:36   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ May 22 2012,08:47)
Joe so ronery:

Perhaps he'll post a link to some pornography on UD like he did on Lizzie's blog.  That would be an entertaining Friday meltdown.

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 3161
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 22 2012,09:34   

Quote (Patrick @ May 22 2012,08:36)
Perhaps he'll post a link to some pornography on UD like he did on Lizzie's blog.  That would be an entertaining Friday meltdown.

I can see GilDo and Gordon's reaction now:

"Gosh darn it Joe!  We're giving you exactly six months to stop posting that!

:D

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"Global warming can't be real because it still gets cooler at night"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"

Whizz-dumb from Joe Gallien, world's dumbest YEC

  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1267
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 22 2012,09:57   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ May 22 2012,09:34)
Quote (Patrick @ May 22 2012,08:36)
Perhaps he'll post a link to some pornography on UD like he did on Lizzie's blog.  That would be an entertaining Friday meltdown.

I can see GilDo and Gordon's reaction now:

"Gosh darn it Joe!  We're giving you exactly six months to stop posting that!

:D

KF patrols the internet for porn to be outraged by on a regular basis, so the novelty of anything posted by Joe would wear off after a couple of days, not six months.

--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
NormOlsen



Posts: 104
Joined: Nov. 2011

(Permalink) Posted: May 22 2012,12:21   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ May 22 2012,09:57)
     
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ May 22 2012,09:34)
       
Quote (Patrick @ May 22 2012,08:36)
Perhaps he'll post a link to some pornography on UD like he did on Lizzie's blog.  That would be an entertaining Friday meltdown.

I can see GilDo and Gordon's reaction now:

"Gosh darn it Joe!  We're giving you exactly six months to stop posting that!

:D

KF patrols the internet for porn to be outraged by on a regular basis, so the novelty of anything posted by Joe would wear off after a couple of days, not six months.


He should see his doctor if his outrage lasts longer than 4 hours.

<terrible i know>

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: May 22 2012,19:18   

Isn't it interesting that kf, arrington, ba77, and the rest of the UD holy rollers don't seem to have any problem with the very 'unholy' way that joey g behaves?

And think of how kf, especially, regularly uses all kinds of guilt by association weapons in his attacks on "evolutionary materialists", but for some reason he doesn't mind associating with little joey. It obviously doesn't matter how foul joey is as long as he defends and promotes ID.

I have a feeling that if Charles Manson or 'El Loco' (Daniel Elizondo Jesus Ramirez) were pushing ID, the IDiots at UD would welcome them with open arms.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
CeilingCat



Posts: 2162
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 22 2012,23:26   

Quote (The whole truth @ May 22 2012,19:18)
Isn't it interesting that kf, arrington, ba77, and the rest of the UD holy rollers don't seem to have any problem with the very 'unholy' way that joey g behaves?

And think of how kf, especially, regularly uses all kinds of guilt by association weapons in his attacks on "evolutionary materialists", but for some reason he doesn't mind associating with little joey. It obviously doesn't matter how foul joey is as long as he defends and promotes ID.

I have a feeling that if Charles Manson or 'El Loco' (Daniel Elizondo Jesus Ramirez) were pushing ID, the IDiots at UD would welcome them with open arms.

Very likely.  Look at Dictator Rios Montt and Pat Robertson.  Jerry Falwell was also Montt's buddy.  Montt is accused of killing as many as 200,000 people.  He wiped whole villages off the map.  That makes 'El Loco' and Charles Manson combined look like pikers.

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: May 23 2012,00:10   

Quote (CeilingCat @ May 22 2012,21:26)
Quote (The whole truth @ May 22 2012,19:18)
Isn't it interesting that kf, arrington, ba77, and the rest of the UD holy rollers don't seem to have any problem with the very 'unholy' way that joey g behaves?

And think of how kf, especially, regularly uses all kinds of guilt by association weapons in his attacks on "evolutionary materialists", but for some reason he doesn't mind associating with little joey. It obviously doesn't matter how foul joey is as long as he defends and promotes ID.

I have a feeling that if Charles Manson or 'El Loco' (Daniel Elizondo Jesus Ramirez) were pushing ID, the IDiots at UD would welcome them with open arms.

Very likely.  Look at Dictator Rios Montt and Pat Robertson.  Jerry Falwell was also Montt's buddy.  Montt is accused of killing as many as 200,000 people.  He wiped whole villages off the map.  That makes 'El Loco' and Charles Manson combined look like pikers.

The "righteous"? Could any description be more backassward?

pat robertson reminds me of gordon e mullings, the monster of Montserrat. And they both SUCK.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Kattarina98



Posts: 1267
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 23 2012,02:51   

Quote (The whole truth @ May 23 2012,00:10)
 
Quote (CeilingCat @ May 22 2012,21:26)
 
Quote (The whole truth @ May 22 2012,19:18)
Isn't it interesting that kf, arrington, ba77, and the rest of the UD holy rollers don't seem to have any problem with the very 'unholy' way that joey g behaves?

And think of how kf, especially, regularly uses all kinds of guilt by association weapons in his attacks on "evolutionary materialists", but for some reason he doesn't mind associating with little joey. It obviously doesn't matter how foul joey is as long as he defends and promotes ID.

I have a feeling that if Charles Manson or 'El Loco' (Daniel Elizondo Jesus Ramirez) were pushing ID, the IDiots at UD would welcome them with open arms.

Very likely.  Look at Dictator Rios Montt and Pat Robertson.  Jerry Falwell was also Montt's buddy.  Montt is accused of killing as many as 200,000 people.  He wiped whole villages off the map.  That makes 'El Loco' and Charles Manson combined look like pikers.

The "righteous"? Could any description be more backassward?

pat robertson reminds me of gordon e mullings, the monster of Montserrat. And they both SUCK.

You two don't understand the forgiving mindset of True Christians™. It's fine to be a criminal if you accept Jesus in your heart later. Remember KF boasted to be employing a couple of ex-cons (murderers? - I'm too lazy to look for the page) because they had repented.

--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
Robin



Posts: 1431
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 23 2012,08:30   

Quote (The whole truth @ May 22 2012,19:18)
Isn't it interesting that kf, arrington, ba77, and the rest of the UD holy rollers don't seem to have any problem with the very 'unholy' way that joey g behaves?

Not that interesting when you consider the 'unholy' way they all behave...

--------------
we IDists rule in design for the flagellum and cilium largely because they do look designed.  Bilbo

The only reason you reject Thor is because, like a cushion, you bear the imprint of the biggest arse that sat on you. Louis

  
Patrick



Posts: 638
Joined: July 2011

(Permalink) Posted: May 23 2012,09:13   

Okay, which one of you is Jerad?  Someone is polluting the tard pool with reality.  Admittedly it's directed at Joe, so there's no danger of it sticking, but it's the principle of the thing.

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 2162
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2012,03:12   

Gil jumps to a conclusion:        
Quote
And this stuff is passed off as science? This makes belief in Tinkerbell sound like the epitome of rationality.

Where is the rigorous, scientific, analytical evaluation of this proposal? James Barham reasons as follows:

Humans breathe out C02. CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Greenhouse gasses are heat-trapping. Therefore, make humans smaller, AND WE CAN SAVE THE PLANET FROM IMPENDING DOOM! (Oh, and I guess that if we were smaller we would drive smaller cars, etc., and therefore burn fewer fossil fuels.)

How do such obviously mindless clowns like this guy get any press?

This is example 52,547 which demonstrates how secular materialism has corrupted legitimate science.

Faithful Bilbo sets him straight:        
Quote
Gil,

Barham was reviewing an article where a scientist proposed reducing the size of humans in order to reduce our carbon footprint.

Gil recovers gracefully:        
Quote
 

Actually, he prints a whole message full of indignation which never once acknowledges his error.  Short version: The universe is going to die, but not me because I'm a Christian and Jesus loves me.  Also, he's always been incredibly smart and very special:      
Quote
Believe it or not, I’ve thought about such things since I was a child.

I now attribute these thoughts to the fact that God implanted eternity in my heart.
If God implanted anything in his head, he doesn't mention it.
Tard

  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1267
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2012,06:21   

Oh noes - the Tree of Life is crashing down - down - down!
Quote
If turtles are closer to birds than to lizards and snakes, genetically, then …

Doesn’t this raise some questions about conventional accounts of evolution? Or do we still pretend we didn’t notice?


Remember, Denyse said it first.

--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
DiEb



Posts: 286
Joined: May 2008

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2012,09:33   

I commented at Uncommon Descent to the post Evolutionary Informatics Lab- a look inside … - though I doubt that my contribution will ever appear:

 
Quote
DiEb
May 24, 2012 at 8:24 am
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Today I was informed that the paper "The Search for a Search" was appended by an errata section. I see that this has had an instantaneous effect on the home-page of the Evolutionary Informatics Lab: the link to the sub-page errata disappeared during the last few days (I still found it in the google-cache of May 19 2012!).


For more on this: see our thread on Evolutionary Computation....

Edited by DiEb on May 24 2012,15:35

   
NormOlsen



Posts: 104
Joined: Nov. 2011

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2012,10:03   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ May 24 2012,06:21)
Oh noes - the Tree of Life is crashing down - down - down!  
Quote
If turtles are closer to birds than to lizards and snakes, genetically, then …

Doesn’t this raise some questions about conventional accounts of evolution? Or do we still pretend we didn’t notice?


Remember, Denyse said it first.

And then Joe follows up with this:

Quote
BTW a turtle out of its shell does look like a bird without feathers.


Yup, just like a bird without feathers, or a backbone, or guts and stuff.

Stupid and cruel; what a combo.

  
Timothy McDougald



Posts: 1030
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2012,10:23   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ May 24 2012,06:21)
Oh noes - the Tree of Life is crashing down - down - down!  
Quote
If turtles are closer to birds than to lizards and snakes, genetically, then …

Doesn’t this raise some questions about conventional accounts of evolution? Or do we still pretend we didn’t notice?


Remember, Denyse said it first.

So, currently evolutionists think that turtles are either more closely related to snakes and lizards (lepidosaurs) or more closely related to crocodiles and birds (archosaurs). The first is supported by morphological studies and microRNA studies, the second by morphological studies, mtDNA and nucDNA studies. A new genetic study comes out that supports the archosaur hypothesis and this overturns the "conventional" account how?

--------------
Church burning ebola boy

FTK: I Didn't answer your questions because it beats the hell out of me.

PaV: I suppose for me to be pried away from what I do to focus long and hard on that particular problem would take, quite honestly, hundreds of thousands of dollars to begin to pique my interest.

   
Kattarina98



Posts: 1267
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2012,11:33   

Quote (afarensis @ May 24 2012,10:23)
 
Quote (Kattarina98 @ May 24 2012,06:21)
Oh noes - the Tree of Life is crashing down - down - down!    
Quote
If turtles are closer to birds than to lizards and snakes, genetically, then …

Doesn’t this raise some questions about conventional accounts of evolution? Or do we still pretend we didn’t notice?


Remember, Denyse said it first.

So, currently evolutionists think that turtles are either more closely related to snakes and lizards (lepidosaurs) or more closely related to crocodiles and birds (archosaurs). The first is supported by morphological studies and microRNA studies, the second by morphological studies, mtDNA and nucDNA studies. A new genetic study comes out that supports the archosaur hypothesis and this overturns the "conventional" account how?

And even if the conventional account were overturned, so effing what? When genetics showed that whales are not descended from mesonychids but from artiodactyls it was just a super cool discovery. Common descent was not shattered to bits - but Denyse seems to conclude it with the new turtle cladogram.

--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
Timothy McDougald



Posts: 1030
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2012,12:19   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ May 24 2012,11:33)
Quote (afarensis @ May 24 2012,10:23)
 
Quote (Kattarina98 @ May 24 2012,06:21)
Oh noes - the Tree of Life is crashing down - down - down!      
Quote
If turtles are closer to birds than to lizards and snakes, genetically, then …

Doesn’t this raise some questions about conventional accounts of evolution? Or do we still pretend we didn’t notice?


Remember, Denyse said it first.

So, currently evolutionists think that turtles are either more closely related to snakes and lizards (lepidosaurs) or more closely related to crocodiles and birds (archosaurs). The first is supported by morphological studies and microRNA studies, the second by morphological studies, mtDNA and nucDNA studies. A new genetic study comes out that supports the archosaur hypothesis and this overturns the "conventional" account how?

And even if the conventional account were overturned, so effing what? When genetics showed that whales are not descended from mesonychids but from artiodactyls it was just a super cool discovery. Common descent was not shattered to bits - but Denyse seems to conclude it with the new turtle cladogram.

That too!

--------------
Church burning ebola boy

FTK: I Didn't answer your questions because it beats the hell out of me.

PaV: I suppose for me to be pried away from what I do to focus long and hard on that particular problem would take, quite honestly, hundreds of thousands of dollars to begin to pique my interest.

   
Patrick



Posts: 638
Joined: July 2011

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2012,12:23   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ May 24 2012,12:33)
Quote (afarensis @ May 24 2012,10:23)
 
Quote (Kattarina98 @ May 24 2012,06:21)
Oh noes - the Tree of Life is crashing down - down - down!      
Quote
If turtles are closer to birds than to lizards and snakes, genetically, then …

Doesn’t this raise some questions about conventional accounts of evolution? Or do we still pretend we didn’t notice?


Remember, Denyse said it first.

So, currently evolutionists think that turtles are either more closely related to snakes and lizards (lepidosaurs) or more closely related to crocodiles and birds (archosaurs). The first is supported by morphological studies and microRNA studies, the second by morphological studies, mtDNA and nucDNA studies. A new genetic study comes out that supports the archosaur hypothesis and this overturns the "conventional" account how?

And even if the conventional account were overturned, so effing what? When genetics showed that whales are not descended from mesonychids but from artiodactyls it was just a super cool discovery. Common descent was not shattered to bits - but Denyse seems to conclude it with the new turtle cladogram.

Science is always changing, but religion doesn't*, therefore religion wins!

* On the timescales of a human life, usually.

  
Robin



Posts: 1431
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2012,14:24   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ May 24 2012,11:33)
Quote (afarensis @ May 24 2012,10:23)
 
Quote (Kattarina98 @ May 24 2012,06:21)
Oh noes - the Tree of Life is crashing down - down - down!      
Quote
If turtles are closer to birds than to lizards and snakes, genetically, then …

Doesn’t this raise some questions about conventional accounts of evolution? Or do we still pretend we didn’t notice?


Remember, Denyse said it first.

So, currently evolutionists think that turtles are either more closely related to snakes and lizards (lepidosaurs) or more closely related to crocodiles and birds (archosaurs). The first is supported by morphological studies and microRNA studies, the second by morphological studies, mtDNA and nucDNA studies. A new genetic study comes out that supports the archosaur hypothesis and this overturns the "conventional" account how?

And even if the conventional account were overturned, so effing what? When genetics showed that whales are not descended from mesonychids but from artiodactyls it was just a super cool discovery. Common descent was not shattered to bits - but Denyse seems to conclude it with the new turtle cladogram.

Ehhh...it's a transitional form. You'd expect it to fit a bit in both areas...


;)

--------------
we IDists rule in design for the flagellum and cilium largely because they do look designed.  Bilbo

The only reason you reject Thor is because, like a cushion, you bear the imprint of the biggest arse that sat on you. Louis

  
olegt



Posts: 1405
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2012,14:28   

For some reason, this reminds me of Beavis and Butthead:
 
Quote

StephenB May 24, 2012 at 12:57 pm

If Gil ever does give a commencement address, I want to be in the audience.


--------------
If you are not:
Galapagos Finch
please Logout »

  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1267
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2012,14:53   

Quote (Robin @ May 24 2012,14:24)
Quote (Kattarina98 @ May 24 2012,11:33)
 
Quote (afarensis @ May 24 2012,10:23)
   
Quote (Kattarina98 @ May 24 2012,06:21)
Oh noes - the Tree of Life is crashing down - down - down!        
Quote
If turtles are closer to birds than to lizards and snakes, genetically, then …

Doesn’t this raise some questions about conventional accounts of evolution? Or do we still pretend we didn’t notice?


Remember, Denyse said it first.

So, currently evolutionists think that turtles are either more closely related to snakes and lizards (lepidosaurs) or more closely related to crocodiles and birds (archosaurs). The first is supported by morphological studies and microRNA studies, the second by morphological studies, mtDNA and nucDNA studies. A new genetic study comes out that supports the archosaur hypothesis and this overturns the "conventional" account how?

And even if the conventional account were overturned, so effing what? When genetics showed that whales are not descended from mesonychids but from artiodactyls it was just a super cool discovery. Common descent was not shattered to bits - but Denyse seems to conclude it with the new turtle cladogram.

Ehhh...it's a transitional form. You'd expect it to fit a bit in both areas...


;)

Oooops - did I read this graphic wrong?


--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
Robin



Posts: 1431
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2012,15:10   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ May 24 2012,14:53)
Oooops - did I read this graphic wrong?

No...my bad. I was responding - rather tongue-in-cheekly - to Denise's cluenessless in terms what taxonomic ambiguity. It's pretty much the same type of ignorance displayed in the whole "there's no transitionals" type of claim. Sorry for the confusion.

--------------
we IDists rule in design for the flagellum and cilium largely because they do look designed.  Bilbo

The only reason you reject Thor is because, like a cushion, you bear the imprint of the biggest arse that sat on you. Louis

  
keiths



Posts: 2090
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2012,20:49   

Denyse is as clueless as Joe when it comes to trees.

Remember this one?



Edited by keiths on May 24 2012,18:50

--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number. -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don't belong there and thoughts into my mind that don't belong there. -- KF

  
Henry J



Posts: 5175
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2012,22:54   

Quote
Oh noes - the Tree of Life is crashing down - down - down!
Quote

If turtles are closer to birds than to lizards and snakes, genetically, then ?

Doesn?t this raise some questions about conventional accounts of evolution? Or do we still pretend we didn?t notice?

The Tree-of-Life website http://tolweb.org/Amniota....90 has some discussion about where to put turtles on the tree. The primary diagram shows them with the Anapsida, but with a question mark.

I recall somebody (may have been Lenny) saying they were closer to Diapsida than to Anapsida.

Henry

  
Zachriel



Posts: 2716
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 25 2012,13:10   

Quote (Henry J @ May 24 2012,22:54)
 
Quote
Oh noes - the Tree of Life is crashing down - down - down!
 
Quote

If turtles are closer to birds than to lizards and snakes, genetically, then ?

Doesn?t this raise some questions about conventional accounts of evolution? Or do we still pretend we didn?t notice?

The Tree-of-Life website http://tolweb.org/Amniota....a....90 has some discussion about where to put turtles on the tree. The primary diagram shows them with the Anapsida, but with a question mark.

I recall somebody (may have been Lenny) saying they were closer to Diapsida than to Anapsida.

Henry

Lyson et al., MicroRNAs support a turtle + lizard clade, Biology Letters 2011.

--------------
Proudly banned three four five times by Uncommon Descent.
There is only one Tard. The Tard is One.

   
sparc



Posts: 2009
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 26 2012,01:02   

If kairosfocus isn’t sufficient to satisfy your desire for tard you may try Mariano Grinbank's series "On the evolution of marriage" series PartI: On the evolution of marriage: on the Bible and traditional marriage in which he asks such important questions as:  
Quote
Was marriage was created via intelligent design?
and answers why marriage can not have evolved  
Quote
Indeed, and it was from this original creative design that it was changed, corrupted


Seemingly he is continuing the series along the following promising lines:  
Quote
   Man + Woman - Nuclear Family: Genesis 2:24

   Man + Brother's Widow (Levirate Marriage) Genesis 38 6:10

   Man + Wives = Concubines

   Rapist + His Victim: Deuteronomy 22:28-29

   Man + Woman + Woman's Property - Genesis 16

   Male Soldier + Prisoner of War - Number 31:1-18, Deuteronomy 21:11-14

   Man + Woman + Woman + Woman...(Polygamy)

   Male Slave + Female Slave - Exodus 21:4


ETA: some illustration from Mario's pages:



Edited by sparc on May 26 2012,01:06

--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < ... 142 143 144 145 146 [147] 148 149 150 151 152 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]