Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > Joe G.'s Tardgasm

Pages: (919) < ... 405 406 407 408 409 [410] 411 412 413 414 415 ... >

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,09:26    English 101- Just because frequency and wavelength are interchangeable under certain contexts does not mean they are interchangeable under all contexts. Obviously the evoTARDs here don't know the difference. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Acartia_Bogart Posts: 2927 Joined: Sep. 2014 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,09:40    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:33) Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:28) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:24)   Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:21)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 18 2018,20:35) For the record- I am denying that I said "Frequency = wavelength." without any context and without any qualifiers. Frequency never equals wavelength, regardless of context or qualification. Math 101. Oh dear, you really are an ignorant asshole- and willfully ignorant at that. Strange that I provided a reference that demonstrates frequency and wavelength are interchangeable in certain contexts. English 101 But your original statement wasn't that they were interchangeable, which they aren't, it was that they were equal. A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. In JokeWorld Roof = hat. Quote A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. Only to a moron. Try walking around with a roof on your head, dipshit But Joke, A roof is interchangeable with a hat under a certain context. By your own argument, this means that a roof is equal to a hat because interchangeable and equal are synonyms.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,09:41    Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,09:40) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:33) Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:28)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:24)   Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:21)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 18 2018,20:35) For the record- I am denying that I said "Frequency = wavelength." without any context and without any qualifiers. Frequency never equals wavelength, regardless of context or qualification. Math 101. Oh dear, you really are an ignorant asshole- and willfully ignorant at that. Strange that I provided a reference that demonstrates frequency and wavelength are interchangeable in certain contexts. English 101 But your original statement wasn't that they were interchangeable, which they aren't, it was that they were equal. A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. In JokeWorld Roof = hat.   Quote A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. Only to a moron. Try walking around with a roof on your head, dipshit But Joke, A roof is interchangeable with a hat under a certain context. By your own argument, this means that a roof is equal to a hat because interchangeable and equal are synonyms. No, you cannot wear a roof, moron. They are not interchangeable -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,09:42    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,07:14)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 18 2018,21:47)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 18 2018,20:35) For the record- I am denying that I said "Frequency = wavelength." without any context and without any qualifiers. You lie about a lot of the really stupid things you have said and done Chubs.   You could put out someone's eye from 50 yards away with your Pinocchio nose. You are the liar, asshole. You are the dumbass who thinks that tree rings are a code. Christ but you're an ignorant dumbass Quote A method to separate temperature and precipitation signals encoded in tree-ring widths for the western Tien Shan Mountains, northwest China Liu et al Global and Planetary Change 133:141-148 · October 2015 Abstract:  Separating temperature and precipitation signals encoded in tree rings is a complicated issue. Here, we present a separation method by combining two tree-ring width chronologies of Schrenk's spruce (Picea schrenkiana) from the upper and lower timberlines in the western Tien Shan Mountains, northwest China. Correlation analyses show that both chronologies correlate positively with precipitation. However, temperature correlates positively with the chronology from the upper timberline, while negatively with the chronology from the lower timberline. This suggests that the two chronologies contain similar precipitation information but opposite temperature signals. In light of this, we calculated the average and difference of the two chronologies, and found that each of them has a much stronger correlation with precipitation or temperature alone. Finally, we reconstructed local precipitation and temperature variations over the past 201. years by using the average and difference of the two chronologies. The two reconstructions do not have a significant correlation, but they have significant positive and negative relationships on the high- and low-frequency band, respectively. Dumbass. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,09:49    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,17:22) Amateur radio frequency allocations- band characteristics: 2200 meters – 135.7–137.8 kHz 630 meters – 472–479 kHz 160 meters – 1800–2000 kHz The wavelength on the left is INTERCHANGEABLE with the frequency on the right. It is a language thing. But then again you morons are clearly too stupid to understand that. Numerical representations- on the left are the numerical representations of the wavelength and on the right are the numerical representations of the frequency. Your laughable "reference" shows the range of frequencies that occupy an ITU Amateur Radio "band" which itself is the approximate wavelength for those frequencies of a EM wave in free space. The ITU bands are both a quick guide to the known qualities EM propagation in those bands in the Amateur radio fraternity and the regulatory provision for the use of a range of frequencies. There is no equivalence in the dimensions. You would never hear an Amateur Radio operator saying find me on 21.238938053097346 meters when he was transmitting on 14.125Mhz. It is not a reference that shows time and distance being interchangeable. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,09:49    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:27 [b) 2200 meters – 135.7–137.8 kHz 630 meters – 472–479 kHz 160 meters – 1800–2000 kHz The wavelength on the left is INTERCHANGEABLE with the frequency on the right. [b] I bet Joke can't wait for his favorite Summer Olympic events The 3.00 MHz dash The 750 KHz relay The 30 KHz distance run. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,09:53    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,17:22) Amateur radio frequency allocations- band characteristics: 2200 meters – 135.7–137.8 kHz 630 meters – 472–479 kHz 160 meters – 1800–2000 kHz The wavelength on the left is INTERCHANGEABLE with the frequency on the right. It is a language thing. But then again you morons are clearly too stupid to understand that. Numerical representations- on the left are the numerical representations of the wavelength and on the right are the numerical representations of the frequency. Gee Joe so what are you saying now? "Numerical representations" for distance and time are the same? -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,09:54    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,17:26) English 101- Just because frequency and wavelength are interchangeable under certain contexts does not mean they are interchangeable under all contexts. Obviously the evoTARDs here don't know the difference. Slight shift here Joe can't make your mind up? It's all a bit gay Joe MELTDOWN stuff. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,09:56    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,17:41) Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,09:40) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:33)   Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:28)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:24)     Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:21)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 18 2018,20:35) For the record- I am denying that I said "Frequency = wavelength." without any context and without any qualifiers. Frequency never equals wavelength, regardless of context or qualification. Math 101. Oh dear, you really are an ignorant asshole- and willfully ignorant at that. Strange that I provided a reference that demonstrates frequency and wavelength are interchangeable in certain contexts. English 101 But your original statement wasn't that they were interchangeable, which they aren't, it was that they were equal. A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. In JokeWorld Roof = hat.   Quote A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. Only to a moron. Try walking around with a roof on your head, dipshit But Joke, A roof is interchangeable with a hat under a certain context. By your own argument, this means that a roof is equal to a hat because interchangeable and equal are synonyms. No, you cannot wear a roof, moron. They are not interchangeable But they both keep the rain off so they are synonymous with each other. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,09:59    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 19 2018,09:42) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,07:14)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 18 2018,21:47)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 18 2018,20:35) For the record- I am denying that I said "Frequency = wavelength." without any context and without any qualifiers. You lie about a lot of the really stupid things you have said and done Chubs.   You could put out someone's eye from 50 yards away with your Pinocchio nose. You are the liar, asshole. You are the dumbass who thinks that tree rings are a code. Christ but you're an ignorant dumbass   Quote A method to separate temperature and precipitation signals encoded in tree-ring widths for the western Tien Shan Mountains, northwest China Liu et al Global and Planetary Change 133:141-148 · October 2015 Abstract:  Separating temperature and precipitation signals encoded in tree rings is a complicated issue. Here, we present a separation method by combining two tree-ring width chronologies of Schrenk's spruce (Picea schrenkiana) from the upper and lower timberlines in the western Tien Shan Mountains, northwest China. Correlation analyses show that both chronologies correlate positively with precipitation. However, temperature correlates positively with the chronology from the upper timberline, while negatively with the chronology from the lower timberline. This suggests that the two chronologies contain similar precipitation information but opposite temperature signals. In light of this, we calculated the average and difference of the two chronologies, and found that each of them has a much stronger correlation with precipitation or temperature alone. Finally, we reconstructed local precipitation and temperature variations over the past 201. years by using the average and difference of the two chronologies. The two reconstructions do not have a significant correlation, but they have significant positive and negative relationships on the high- and low-frequency band, respectively. Dumbass. LoL! What a dumbass! Tree rings are not a code and your reference doesn't say that they are. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,10:00    Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,09:54) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,17:26) English 101- Just because frequency and wavelength are interchangeable under certain contexts does not mean they are interchangeable under all contexts. Obviously the evoTARDs here don't know the difference. Slight shift here Joe can't make your mind up? It's all a bit gay Joe MELTDOWN stuff. What shift? Just because you are too ignorant to read for comprehension doesn't mean anything to me. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,10:00    Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,09:56) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,17:41) Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,09:40)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:33)   Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:28)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:24)     Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:21)       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 18 2018,20:35) For the record- I am denying that I said "Frequency = wavelength." without any context and without any qualifiers. Frequency never equals wavelength, regardless of context or qualification. Math 101. Oh dear, you really are an ignorant asshole- and willfully ignorant at that. Strange that I provided a reference that demonstrates frequency and wavelength are interchangeable in certain contexts. English 101 But your original statement wasn't that they were interchangeable, which they aren't, it was that they were equal. A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. In JokeWorld Roof = hat.     Quote A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. Only to a moron. Try walking around with a roof on your head, dipshit But Joke, A roof is interchangeable with a hat under a certain context. By your own argument, this means that a roof is equal to a hat because interchangeable and equal are synonyms. No, you cannot wear a roof, moron. They are not interchangeable But they both keep the rain off so they are synonymous with each other. No, hats do not keep the rain off of you, dumbass. You still get wet. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,10:04    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,18:00) Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,09:56) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,17:41)   Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,09:40)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:33)     Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:28)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:24)       Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:21)       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 18 2018,20:35) For the record- I am denying that I said "Frequency = wavelength." without any context and without any qualifiers. Frequency never equals wavelength, regardless of context or qualification. Math 101. Oh dear, you really are an ignorant asshole- and willfully ignorant at that. Strange that I provided a reference that demonstrates frequency and wavelength are interchangeable in certain contexts. English 101 But your original statement wasn't that they were interchangeable, which they aren't, it was that they were equal. A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. In JokeWorld Roof = hat.     Quote A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. Only to a moron. Try walking around with a roof on your head, dipshit But Joke, A roof is interchangeable with a hat under a certain context. By your own argument, this means that a roof is equal to a hat because interchangeable and equal are synonyms. No, you cannot wear a roof, moron. They are not interchangeable But they both keep the rain off so they are synonymous with each other. No, hats do not keep the rain off of you, dumbass. You still get wet. It does if its a sou'wester. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,10:05    Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,09:49) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,17:22) Amateur radio frequency allocations- band characteristics: 2200 meters – 135.7–137.8 kHz 630 meters – 472–479 kHz 160 meters – 1800–2000 kHz The wavelength on the left is INTERCHANGEABLE with the frequency on the right. It is a language thing. But then again you morons are clearly too stupid to understand that. Numerical representations- on the left are the numerical representations of the wavelength and on the right are the numerical representations of the frequency. Your laughable "reference" shows the range of frequencies that occupy an ITU Amateur Radio "band" which itself is the approximate wavelength for those frequencies of a EM wave in free space. The ITU bands are both a quick guide to the known qualities EM propagation in those bands in the Amateur radio fraternity and the regulatory provision for the use of a range of frequencies. There is no equivalence in the dimensions. You would never hear an Amateur Radio operator saying find me on 21.238938053097346 meters when he was transmitting on 14.125Mhz. It is not a reference that shows time and distance being interchangeable. Wow, your laughable rebuttal just proves that you are a dumbass. And there was a time when radio operators used the wavelength instead of the frequency. So yes, saying that you are transmitting on a frequency of 14.125Mhz is the same as saying you are transmitting on a wavelength of 21.238938053097346 meters. They are INTERCHANGEABLE -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,10:06    Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,10:04) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,18:00) Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,09:56)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,17:41)   Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,09:40)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:33)     Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:28)       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:24)       Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:21)         Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 18 2018,20:35) For the record- I am denying that I said "Frequency = wavelength." without any context and without any qualifiers. Frequency never equals wavelength, regardless of context or qualification. Math 101. Oh dear, you really are an ignorant asshole- and willfully ignorant at that. Strange that I provided a reference that demonstrates frequency and wavelength are interchangeable in certain contexts. English 101 But your original statement wasn't that they were interchangeable, which they aren't, it was that they were equal. A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. In JokeWorld Roof = hat.       Quote A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. Only to a moron. Try walking around with a roof on your head, dipshit But Joke, A roof is interchangeable with a hat under a certain context. By your own argument, this means that a roof is equal to a hat because interchangeable and equal are synonyms. No, you cannot wear a roof, moron. They are not interchangeable But they both keep the rain off so they are synonymous with each other. No, hats do not keep the rain off of you, dumbass. You still get wet. It does if its a sou'wester. Evidence please. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,10:07    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,18:00) Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,09:54) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,17:26) English 101- Just because frequency and wavelength are interchangeable under certain contexts does not mean they are interchangeable under all contexts. Obviously the evoTARDs here don't know the difference. Slight shift here Joe can't make your mind up? It's all a bit gay Joe MELTDOWN stuff. What shift? Just because you are too ignorant to read for comprehension doesn't mean anything to me. Well now you are saying the "numerical representations" are interchangeable in some contexts and not in others. Is that where the numbers are different? Care to elaborate? -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,10:28    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,18:05)   Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,09:49)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,17:22) Amateur radio frequency allocations- band characteristics: 2200 meters – 135.7–137.8 kHz 630 meters – 472–479 kHz 160 meters – 1800–2000 kHz The wavelength on the left is INTERCHANGEABLE with the frequency on the right. It is a language thing. But then again you morons are clearly too stupid to understand that. Numerical representations- on the left are the numerical representations of the wavelength and on the right are the numerical representations of the frequency. Your laughable "reference" shows the range of frequencies that occupy an ITU Amateur Radio "band" which itself is the approximate wavelength for those frequencies of a EM wave in free space. The ITU bands are both a quick guide to the known qualities EM propagation in those bands in the Amateur radio fraternity and the regulatory provision for the use of a range of frequencies. There is no equivalence in the dimensions. You would never hear an Amateur Radio operator saying find me on 21.238938053097346 meters when he was transmitting on 14.125Mhz. It is not a reference that shows time and distance being interchangeable. Wow, your laughable rebuttal just proves that you are a dumbass. And there was a time when radio operators used the wavelength instead of the frequency. So yes, saying that you are transmitting on a frequency of 14.125Mhz is the same as saying you are transmitting on a wavelength of 21.238938053097346 meters. They are INTERCHANGEABLE Your history of radio is poor. They used cycles per second which were replaced by the physical unit of Hertz by the IEC in 1930 and the CGPM in 1960. Look it up if you dare. No Joe they CONVERT from the wave's distance between peaks to the wave's period of repetition using the formula  Wave Period = Wavelength / Velocity. If you had ever been in a Physics class and were listening you would know that a simple check using dimensional analysis would show any errors in a given formula. Do you know how to do that Joe? Bueller, Joe, Joe? Funny thing is Joe just about anyone ....Anyone following this thread can make that calculation..... anyone except you. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Acartia_Bogart Posts: 2927 Joined: Sep. 2014 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,10:30    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:54) Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:52) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:30)   Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:28)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:24)     Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:21)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 18 2018,20:35) For the record- I am denying that I said "Frequency = wavelength." without any context and without any qualifiers. Frequency never equals wavelength, regardless of context or qualification. Math 101. Oh dear, you really are an ignorant asshole- and willfully ignorant at that. Strange that I provided a reference that demonstrates frequency and wavelength are interchangeable in certain contexts. English 101 But your original statement wasn't that they were interchangeable, which they aren't, it was that they were equal. A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. In JokeWorld Roof = hat. Oh dear. You are too stupid to understand my original statement. You weren't even part of the discussion. Interchangeable and equal are synonyms, moron. Again your ignorance of English is not an argument let alone a refutation. So then you are saying that roof equals hat. This just keeps getting better. Moar desperation from the pokey loser. I said that roofs and hats are not interchangeable. Under a certain context, which I provided a qualification for, they certainly are interchangeable. If the purpose is to keep my curly locks dry, they both function equally well and are, therefore, interchangeable. Proving that under JokeLogic, Roof = Hat.

Acartia_Bogart Posts: 2927 Joined: Sep. 2014 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,10:37    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,10:00) Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,09:56) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,17:41)   Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,09:40)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:33)     Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:28)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:24)       Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:21)       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 18 2018,20:35) For the record- I am denying that I said "Frequency = wavelength." without any context and without any qualifiers. Frequency never equals wavelength, regardless of context or qualification. Math 101. Oh dear, you really are an ignorant asshole- and willfully ignorant at that. Strange that I provided a reference that demonstrates frequency and wavelength are interchangeable in certain contexts. English 101 But your original statement wasn't that they were interchangeable, which they aren't, it was that they were equal. A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. In JokeWorld Roof = hat.     Quote A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. Only to a moron. Try walking around with a roof on your head, dipshit But Joke, A roof is interchangeable with a hat under a certain context. By your own argument, this means that a roof is equal to a hat because interchangeable and equal are synonyms. No, you cannot wear a roof, moron. They are not interchangeable But they both keep the rain off so they are synonymous with each other. No, hats do not keep the rain off of you, dumbass. You still get wet. The context was keeping the rain off my head. Context is important Joke. Please keep up.

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,10:46    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,18:06) Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,10:04) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,18:00)   Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,09:56)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,17:41)     Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,09:40)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:33)       Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:28)       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:24)         Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:21)         Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 18 2018,20:35) For the record- I am denying that I said "Frequency = wavelength." without any context and without any qualifiers. Frequency never equals wavelength, regardless of context or qualification. Math 101. Oh dear, you really are an ignorant asshole- and willfully ignorant at that. Strange that I provided a reference that demonstrates frequency and wavelength are interchangeable in certain contexts. English 101 But your original statement wasn't that they were interchangeable, which they aren't, it was that they were equal. A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. In JokeWorld Roof = hat.       Quote A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. Only to a moron. Try walking around with a roof on your head, dipshit But Joke, A roof is interchangeable with a hat under a certain context. By your own argument, this means that a roof is equal to a hat because interchangeable and equal are synonyms. No, you cannot wear a roof, moron. They are not interchangeable But they both keep the rain off so they are synonymous with each other. No, hats do not keep the rain off of you, dumbass. You still get wet. It does if its a sou'wester. Evidence please. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Acartia_Bogart Posts: 2927 Joined: Sep. 2014 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,11:08    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,10:06) Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,10:04) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,18:00)   Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,09:56)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,17:41)     Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,09:40)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:33)       Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:28)       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:24)         Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:21)         Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 18 2018,20:35) For the record- I am denying that I said "Frequency = wavelength." without any context and without any qualifiers. Frequency never equals wavelength, regardless of context or qualification. Math 101. Oh dear, you really are an ignorant asshole- and willfully ignorant at that. Strange that I provided a reference that demonstrates frequency and wavelength are interchangeable in certain contexts. English 101 But your original statement wasn't that they were interchangeable, which they aren't, it was that they were equal. A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. In JokeWorld Roof = hat.       Quote A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. Only to a moron. Try walking around with a roof on your head, dipshit But Joke, A roof is interchangeable with a hat under a certain context. By your own argument, this means that a roof is equal to a hat because interchangeable and equal are synonyms. No, you cannot wear a roof, moron. They are not interchangeable But they both keep the rain off so they are synonymous with each other. No, hats do not keep the rain off of you, dumbass. You still get wet. It does if its a sou'wester. Evidence please.

JohnW Posts: 3217 Joined: Aug. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,11:22    Joephysics 102: v = f λ , therefore frequency = wavelength By the same "reasoning": p = mv, therefore mass = velocity Also: E = (mv^^2)/2, therefore mass / 2 = velocity squared Therefore velocity / 2 = velocity squared Therefore velocity = 1/2 Therefore velocity is a dimensionless quantity, value 0.5, for everything in the universe. -------------- Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,11:50    Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,10:07) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,18:00) Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,09:54)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,17:26) English 101- Just because frequency and wavelength are interchangeable under certain contexts does not mean they are interchangeable under all contexts. Obviously the evoTARDs here don't know the difference. Slight shift here Joe can't make your mind up? It's all a bit gay Joe MELTDOWN stuff. What shift? Just because you are too ignorant to read for comprehension doesn't mean anything to me. Well now you are saying the "numerical representations" are interchangeable in some contexts and not in others. Is that where the numbers are different? Care to elaborate? I have already made the case and provided the reference. And I have made the numerical representation argument many times already. Thank you for proving that you don't even read what you are responding to. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Henry J Posts: 5786 Joined: Mar. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,11:51    Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,07:59) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,16:31) I provided references that demonstrate the two are INTERCHANGEABLE in certain contexts. And anyone who isn't a total moron could easily see the context cited is the same as the context used, ie you can talk about the wavelength or the frequency but you are still talking about a species of infrared. 6 of one/ half dozen of the other. Different numerical representations of the same wave. You have to be a totally desperate asshole to try to twist what I said into anything other than that. The person I was having the discussion with didn't complain. Only you complained and that was after your total failure to make your point. You had to try to cover your tracks so you quote-mined and humped it for how many pathetic years? Frequency and wavelength are not "numerical" representations they are dimensions of time and distance in English physics, French physics and hillbilly duck hunting. They are not interchangeable. Example: Joe and Bubba shot two ducks every second for an hour, the ducks were all flying at an altitude of 100 feet. The frequency of duck shooting was 120 shot ducks per hour. What was the total distance the dead ducks dropped over the hour? Quack! AFLAC!

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,11:53    Quote (JohnW @ Mar. 19 2018,11:22) Joephysics 102: v = f λ , therefore frequency = wavelength By the same "reasoning": p = mv, therefore mass = velocity Also: E = (mv^^2)/2, therefore mass / 2 = velocity squared Therefore velocity / 2 = velocity squared Therefore velocity = 1/2 Therefore velocity is a dimensionless quantity, value 0.5, for everything in the universe. Except that doesn't have anything to do with what I said. According to this reference transmitting on the (wavelength of) 160 meter band EQUALS transmitting on a frequency of 1800–2000 kHz. Try to follow along. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,11:56    Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,10:30) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:54) Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:52)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:30)   Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:28)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,08:24)     Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Mar. 19 2018,08:21)       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 18 2018,20:35) For the record- I am denying that I said "Frequency = wavelength." without any context and without any qualifiers. Frequency never equals wavelength, regardless of context or qualification. Math 101. Oh dear, you really are an ignorant asshole- and willfully ignorant at that. Strange that I provided a reference that demonstrates frequency and wavelength are interchangeable in certain contexts. English 101 But your original statement wasn't that they were interchangeable, which they aren't, it was that they were equal. A roof is interchangeable for a rain hat to keep the rain off your head. In JokeWorld Roof = hat. Oh dear. You are too stupid to understand my original statement. You weren't even part of the discussion. Interchangeable and equal are synonyms, moron. Again your ignorance of English is not an argument let alone a refutation. So then you are saying that roof equals hat. This just keeps getting better. Moar desperation from the pokey loser. I said that roofs and hats are not interchangeable. Under a certain context, which I provided a qualification for, they certainly are interchangeable. If the purpose is to keep my curly locks dry, they both function equally well and are, therefore, interchangeable. Proving that under JokeLogic, Roof = Hat. Context, moron. In certain contexts a rain hat can become a roof. So yes in specific contexts they are interchangeable. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,11:58    Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,10:28) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,18:05)   Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 19 2018,09:49)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 19 2018,17:22) Amateur radio frequency allocations- band characteristics: 2200 meters – 135.7–137.8 kHz 630 meters – 472–479 kHz 160 meters – 1800–2000 kHz The wavelength on the left is INTERCHANGEABLE with the frequency on the right. It is a language thing. But then again you morons are clearly too stupid to understand that. Numerical representations- on the left are the numerical representations of the wavelength and on the right are the numerical representations of the frequency. Your laughable "reference" shows the range of frequencies that occupy an ITU Amateur Radio "band" which itself is the approximate wavelength for those frequencies of a EM wave in free space. The ITU bands are both a quick guide to the known qualities EM propagation in those bands in the Amateur radio fraternity and the regulatory provision for the use of a range of frequencies. There is no equivalence in the dimensions. You would never hear an Amateur Radio operator saying find me on 21.238938053097346 meters when he was transmitting on 14.125Mhz. It is not a reference that shows time and distance being interchangeable. Wow, your laughable rebuttal just proves that you are a dumbass. And there was a time when radio operators used the wavelength instead of the frequency. So yes, saying that you are transmitting on a frequency of 14.125Mhz is the same as saying you are transmitting on a wavelength of 21.238938053097346 meters. They are INTERCHANGEABLE Your history of radio is poor. They used cycles per second which were replaced by the physical unit of Hertz by the IEC in 1930 and the CGPM in 1960. Look it up if you dare. No Joe they CONVERT from the wave's distance between peaks to the wave's period of repetition using the formula  Wave Period = Wavelength / Velocity. If you had ever been in a Physics class and were listening you would know that a simple check using dimensional analysis would show any errors in a given formula. Do you know how to do that Joe? Bueller, Joe, Joe? Funny thing is Joe just about anyone ....Anyone following this thread can make that calculation..... anyone except you. Nope, they used to say they were transmitting on a wavelength band. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

stevestory Posts: 13407 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,12:15    Quote (JohnW @ Mar. 19 2018,12:22) Joephysics 102: v = f λ , therefore frequency = wavelength By the same "reasoning": p = mv, therefore mass = velocity Also: E = (mv^^2)/2, therefore mass / 2 = velocity squared Therefore velocity / 2 = velocity squared Therefore velocity = 1/2 Therefore velocity is a dimensionless quantity, value 0.5, for everything in the universe. If you're up to speed on Conservapedia, you'll know that E=mc² is a buncha Jew bullshit. http://www.conservapedia.com/E%3Dmc%....c%C2%B2

JohnW Posts: 3217 Joined: Aug. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,12:31    Quote (stevestory @ Mar. 19 2018,10:15) Quote (JohnW @ Mar. 19 2018,12:22) Joephysics 102: v = f λ , therefore frequency = wavelength By the same "reasoning": p = mv, therefore mass = velocity Also: E = (mv^^2)/2, therefore mass / 2 = velocity squared Therefore velocity / 2 = velocity squared Therefore velocity = 1/2 Therefore velocity is a dimensionless quantity, value 0.5, for everything in the universe. If you're up to speed on Conservapedia, you'll know that E=mc² is a buncha Jew bullshit. http://www.conservapedia.com/E%3Dmc%....c%C2%B2 I actually thought about that - it's why I went with classical mechanics.  If it's good enough for Jesus, it ought to be good enough for Joe. -------------- Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

stevestory Posts: 13407 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 19 2018,12:43    Quote (JohnW @ Mar. 19 2018,13:31) I actually thought about that - it's why I went with classical mechanics.  If it's good enough for Jesus, it ought to be good enough for Joe.

Pages: (919) < ... 405 406 407 408 409 [410] 411 412 413 414 415 ... >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard