Joined: Mar. 2007
|Quote (Ftk @ Sep. 22 2007,19:15)|
|Quote (blipey @ Sep. 22 2007,16:20)|
This might be a great time for you to substantiate that my claim of question dodging is untrue. Please take the requisite 3 seconds to show an example of supersport answering a question. Examples of JoeG doing the same would be great as well (on his thread, of course).
You have made this claim that I am wrong. In your new "show the evidence mode" I guess you'll now be showing me the proof?
Blipster, just because you don't like or agree with a person's answer doesn't mean they didn't give one.
And, dude, I am all about substantiation this time around. Here are just some of his answers...
Here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Baloney. Answers which are just opinions, unsupported by facts, are NOT answers, even "this time around". Click on those 9 links and you find that sporty's answers were, in reality
#1- a bald-faced assertion unsupported by evidence
#2 - answering a question by posing another question, which was not an answer
#3 - an opinion, later shown to be complete bs
#4 - a busted link, perhaps you copied the URL wrong
#5 - an opinion that a dinosaur fossil is 6.8 thousand years old, unsupported by evidence
#6 - an opinion, later debunked
#7 - a quotemine of an article, which was shown not to back up his assertion at all
#8 - same bs as #7, repeated for comic effect?
#9 - a bunch of bs which avoided an actual answer
Furthermore, he avoided ever backing up his claim that mental processes can generate life instantly, even though he was asked about this at least 9 or 10 times.
Sounds like your kind of guy.
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
- Pattiann Rogers