Joined: July 2007
|Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:49)|
|Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:41)|
|Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:38)|
|Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:33)|
|Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:32)|
|Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:29)|
|Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:28)|
|Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:26)|
|Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:22)|
|Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:19)|
|Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:10)|
|Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,16:27)|
|Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,08:23)|
You're talking back at yourself joe stupid idist
You are still too stupid to form an argument.
|"Intelligent design is just the Logos theology of John's Gospel restated in the idiom of information theory", Signs of Intelligence A Primer on the Discernment of Intelligent Design. William A. Dembski. Touchstone Journal, Volume 12, Issue 4, July/August 1999|
This is your hero Dr Dembski's argument which proves joe you are a liar.
|"...referring to an intelligent designer was merely a 'politically correct way to refer to God.'" Numbers, Ronald (2006). The Creationists. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. p. 380. ISBN 0-674-02339-0.|
Ronald Numbers must be an idiot as well joe because "the designer" is just your god by any other name.
Are you an atheist joe?
And still no argument. Look, moron, your false accusations are meaningless.
Dembski said ID doesn't require God. Behe testified that ID doesn't require the supernatural. Minnich testified that ID odes not require the supernatural. Gonzalez said that ID does not require God. And no one one can demonstrate otherwise.
What? You want to re-litigate - Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District??
Good luck with that god boy.
You lost and it's over except for your whining.
What? The evos had to lie and bluff their way through that trial. ID wasn't fazed at all by the trial. The claims of ID still stand unrefuted.
The only thing that lost is truth and justice.
Not in any court here on earth moron.
What does that even mean? It is all facts that evos lied and bluffed their way through the Dover trial. It is all recorded.
And it is also a fact that ID wasn't fazed by the trial and that the claims of ID still stand unrefuted.
Breath taking joe.
What the court found was quite the opposite as you well know. The ID witnesses were found to lied UNDER OATH.
Liar. No one proved any IDists lied under oath. On the other hand it is easily proven that the evos lied and bluffed.
Jones seemed particularly annoyed....
|Jones seemed particularly annoyed by the Dover school board members, who denied under oath that the approval of intelligent design was based on religious conviction, despite the testimony of several witnesses who said board members made overtly religious comments during their deliberations. "It is ironic that several of these individuals, who so staunchly and proudly touted their religious convictions in public, would time and again lie to cover their tracks and disguise the real purpose behind the ID Policy," Jones wrote.|
Caught lying AGAIN joe....SAD
Umm those school board members were not IDists as they didn't even know the basics. And again, just because some IDists may be religious isn't a reflection on ID. Jones is a moron
The old "No true Scotsman argument" ...SAD.
Yes, you are sad
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t
simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.
I usually underestimate my abilities