RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (513) < ... 372 373 374 375 376 [377] 378 379 380 381 382 ... >   
  Topic: Joe G.'s Tardgasm, How long can it last?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Joe G



Posts: 5113
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 19 2018,12:57   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 19 2018,12:42)
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,07:40)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 18 2018,23:08)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 18 2018,16:50)
 
Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 18 2018,16:48)
Nice meltdown Joe

I must be proving that evoTARDs are useless bitches.

Thanks, Dick.

a 12 year old mean girl's attitude with a 7 year old intellect in a 62 year old chubby man's bod.

Yes, that's you to a t, dickie

I have no desire to be in your body ;)

True, you desire to be a 12 year old mean girl's attitude with a 7 year old intellect in a 62 year old chubby man's bod

But you have some growing up to do to reach the 7 year old intellect.

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t

simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

I usually underestimate my abilities

   
Joe G



Posts: 5113
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 19 2018,14:45   

Once sex hit the scene then Common Descent was doomed:
Quote
Sexuality has brought joy to the world, to the world of the wild beasts, and to the world of flowers, but it has brought an end to evolution. In the lineages of living beings, whenever absent-minded Venus has taken the upper hand, forms have forgotten to make progress. It is only the husbandman that has improved strains, and he has done so by bullying, enslaving, and segregating. All these methods, of course, have made for sad, alienated animals, but they have not resulted in new species. Left to themselves, domesticated breeds would either die out or revert to the wild state—scarcely a commendable model for nature’s progress.

After a brief discussion on peppered moths, he continues:
Quote
Natural Selection, which indeed occurs in nature (as Bishop Wilberforce, too, was perfectly aware), mainly has the effect of maintaining equilibrium and stability. It eliminates all those that dare depart from the type—the eccentrics and the adventurers and the marginal sort. It is ever adjusting populations, but it does so in each case by bringing them back to the norm. We read in the textbooks that, when environmental conditions change, the selection process may produce a shift in a population’s mean values, by a process known as adaptation. If the climate turns very cold, the cold-adapted beings are favored relative to others.; if it becomes windy, the wind blows away those that are most exposed; if an illness breaks out, those in questionable health will be lost. But all these artful guiles serve their purpose only until the clouds blow away. The species, in fact, is an organic entity, a typical form, which may deviate only to return to the furrow of its destiny; it may wander from the band only to find its proper place by returning to the gang.

Everything that disassembles, upsets proportions or becomes distorted in any way is sooner or later brought back to the type. There has been a tendency to confuse fleeting adjustments with grand destinies, minor shrewdness with signs of the times.

It is true that species may lose something on the way—the mole its eyes, say, and the succulent plant its leaves, never to recover them again. But here we are dealing with unhappy, mutilated species, at the margins of their area of distribution—the extreme and the specialized. These are species with no future; they are not pioneers, but prisoners in nature’s penitentiary.- geneticist Giuseppe Sermonti, “Why is a Fly Not A Horse?”

Not that evolutionism can account for sexual reproduction in the first place…

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t

simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

I usually underestimate my abilities

   
Joe G



Posts: 5113
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 19 2018,22:10   

Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:06)
Quote (CeilingCat @ Feb. 19 2018,17:13)
ID Rationality on Display™
     
Quote
3 polistra February 19, 2018 at 4:26 pm

The LHC consumes billions of dollars in an EXPLICIT attempt to obliterate the universe with a black hole. That’s all it does.

If any sanity remained in the world, the LHC should have been halted and decommissioned as soon as its purpose was clear.

Again:

And they wonder why no-one takes them seriously.

Wait- the majority of people don't take you evoTARDs seriously. And I doubt that you guys take your own position seriously. How could you seeing it is the most moronic and untestable drivel ever?

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t

simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

I usually underestimate my abilities

   
fnxtr



Posts: 2792
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 19 2018,22:48   

Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,20:10)
 
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:06)
 
Quote (CeilingCat @ Feb. 19 2018,17:13)
ID Rationality on Display™
       
Quote
3 polistra February 19, 2018 at 4:26 pm

The LHC consumes billions of dollars in an EXPLICIT attempt to obliterate the universe with a black hole. That’s all it does.

If any sanity remained in the world, the LHC should have been halted and decommissioned as soon as its purpose was clear.

Again:

And they wonder why no-one takes them seriously.

Wait- the majority of people don't take you evoTARDs seriously. And I doubt that you guys take your own position seriously. How could you seeing it is the most moronic and untestable drivel ever?

So you agree with polistra about the LHC?

--------------
"But it's disturbing to think someone actually thinks creationism -- having put it's hand on the hot stove every day for the last 400 years -- will get a different result tomorrow." -- midwifetoad

"I am in a rush to catch up with science work." -- Gary Gaulin

  
Joe G



Posts: 5113
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 19 2018,23:05   

Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:48)
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,20:10)
 
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:06)
   
Quote (CeilingCat @ Feb. 19 2018,17:13)
ID Rationality on Display™
         
Quote
3 polistra February 19, 2018 at 4:26 pm

The LHC consumes billions of dollars in an EXPLICIT attempt to obliterate the universe with a black hole. That’s all it does.

If any sanity remained in the world, the LHC should have been halted and decommissioned as soon as its purpose was clear.

Again:

And they wonder why no-one takes them seriously.

Wait- the majority of people don't take you evoTARDs seriously. And I doubt that you guys take your own position seriously. How could you seeing it is the most moronic and untestable drivel ever?

So you agree with polistra about the LHC?

Did you read ET's reply to polistra?

USA just scored another goal. 4-1 in the 3rd. Looks like the USA is going on to the quarter finals

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t

simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

I usually underestimate my abilities

   
fnxtr



Posts: 2792
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 19 2018,23:33   

Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,21:05)
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:48)
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,20:10)
   
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:06)
   
Quote (CeilingCat @ Feb. 19 2018,17:13)
ID Rationality on Display™
         
Quote
3 polistra February 19, 2018 at 4:26 pm

The LHC consumes billions of dollars in an EXPLICIT attempt to obliterate the universe with a black hole. That’s all it does.

If any sanity remained in the world, the LHC should have been halted and decommissioned as soon as its purpose was clear.

Again:

And they wonder why no-one takes them seriously.

Wait- the majority of people don't take you evoTARDs seriously. And I doubt that you guys take your own position seriously. How could you seeing it is the most moronic and untestable drivel ever?

So you agree with polistra about the LHC?

Did you read ET's reply to polistra?

USA just scored another goal. 4-1 in the 3rd. Looks like the USA is going on to the quarter finals

No, I didn't.

I answered your question, now you answer mine. Quid pro quo:

I'm asking if you agree with polistra about the LHC.

Do you or don't you?

If you don't, why do you have a problem with me not taking him seriously?

--------------
"But it's disturbing to think someone actually thinks creationism -- having put it's hand on the hot stove every day for the last 400 years -- will get a different result tomorrow." -- midwifetoad

"I am in a rush to catch up with science work." -- Gary Gaulin

  
Joe G



Posts: 5113
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,06:50   

Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,23:33)
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,21:05)
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:48)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,20:10)
   
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:06)
     
Quote (CeilingCat @ Feb. 19 2018,17:13)
ID Rationality on Display™
           
Quote
3 polistra February 19, 2018 at 4:26 pm

The LHC consumes billions of dollars in an EXPLICIT attempt to obliterate the universe with a black hole. That’s all it does.

If any sanity remained in the world, the LHC should have been halted and decommissioned as soon as its purpose was clear.

Again:

And they wonder why no-one takes them seriously.

Wait- the majority of people don't take you evoTARDs seriously. And I doubt that you guys take your own position seriously. How could you seeing it is the most moronic and untestable drivel ever?

So you agree with polistra about the LHC?

Did you read ET's reply to polistra?

USA just scored another goal. 4-1 in the 3rd. Looks like the USA is going on to the quarter finals

No, I didn't.

I answered your question, now you answer mine. Quid pro quo:

I'm asking if you agree with polistra about the LHC.

Do you or don't you?

If you don't, why do you have a problem with me not taking him seriously?

Read ETs response and shut up

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t

simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

I usually underestimate my abilities

   
Joe G



Posts: 5113
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,06:52   

Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 20 2018,06:25)
Quote (stevestory @ Feb. 20 2018,07:11)
Quote
4
ETFebruary 19, 2018 at 7:04 pm
 
Quote

   The LHC consumes billions of dollars in an EXPLICIT attempt to obliterate the universe with a black hole. That’s all it does.

And yet it has been used and we are still here


I'm sure the reply will be that those stupid materialist scientists were just too dumb to understand it wouldn't work.

Those dumb scientists will just have to settle for consolation prizes, like proving the Higgs boson.

If the IDiots were really serious they would buiild their own machine to prove the existence of their imaginary sky daddy ....er sorry imaginary sky designer. All they have to do is do years of research, write some truly remarkable peer reviewed papers apply for the funds work hard for decades  and...... nevermind. It's a lot easier to form a circle jerk on some wretched fundy blog and bitch for decades they are being undermined by the educated and intelligent classes. But they know in their own hearts they're lying to themselves because down to the last weasel they wouldn't waste their mony or their time on such an endeavour.

Hey asshole, you don't have anything to support the claims of your position so perhaps you should focus on that. ID already has plenty of supporting evidence. ID has then research. Blind watchmaker evolution has the liars and the losers

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t

simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

I usually underestimate my abilities

   
fnxtr



Posts: 2792
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,08:58   

Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 20 2018,04:50)
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,23:33)
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,21:05)
 
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:48)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,20:10)
     
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:06)
     
Quote (CeilingCat @ Feb. 19 2018,17:13)
ID Rationality on Display™
           
Quote
3 polistra February 19, 2018 at 4:26 pm

The LHC consumes billions of dollars in an EXPLICIT attempt to obliterate the universe with a black hole. That’s all it does.

If any sanity remained in the world, the LHC should have been halted and decommissioned as soon as its purpose was clear.

Again:

And they wonder why no-one takes them seriously.

Wait- the majority of people don't take you evoTARDs seriously. And I doubt that you guys take your own position seriously. How could you seeing it is the most moronic and untestable drivel ever?

So you agree with polistra about the LHC?

Did you read ET's reply to polistra?

USA just scored another goal. 4-1 in the 3rd. Looks like the USA is going on to the quarter finals

No, I didn't.

I answered your question, now you answer mine. Quid pro quo:

I'm asking if you agree with polistra about the LHC.

Do you or don't you?

If you don't, why do you have a problem with me not taking him seriously?

Read ETs response and shut up

Okay, so you agree with ET, then.
And Olestra is wrong.
Do you think we *should* take Olestra seriously?

--------------
"But it's disturbing to think someone actually thinks creationism -- having put it's hand on the hot stove every day for the last 400 years -- will get a different result tomorrow." -- midwifetoad

"I am in a rush to catch up with science work." -- Gary Gaulin

  
Joe G



Posts: 5113
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,10:07   

Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 20 2018,08:58)
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 20 2018,04:50)
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,23:33)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,21:05)
 
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:48)
   
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,20:10)
     
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:06)
       
Quote (CeilingCat @ Feb. 19 2018,17:13)
ID Rationality on Display™
             
Quote
3 polistra February 19, 2018 at 4:26 pm

The LHC consumes billions of dollars in an EXPLICIT attempt to obliterate the universe with a black hole. That’s all it does.

If any sanity remained in the world, the LHC should have been halted and decommissioned as soon as its purpose was clear.

Again:

And they wonder why no-one takes them seriously.

Wait- the majority of people don't take you evoTARDs seriously. And I doubt that you guys take your own position seriously. How could you seeing it is the most moronic and untestable drivel ever?

So you agree with polistra about the LHC?

Did you read ET's reply to polistra?

USA just scored another goal. 4-1 in the 3rd. Looks like the USA is going on to the quarter finals

No, I didn't.

I answered your question, now you answer mine. Quid pro quo:

I'm asking if you agree with polistra about the LHC.

Do you or don't you?

If you don't, why do you have a problem with me not taking him seriously?

Read ETs response and shut up

Okay, so you agree with ET, then.
And Olestra is wrong.
Do you think we *should* take Olestra seriously?

I am ET. And only if that person has any evidence that was the reason for the LHC and that didn't come from a movie starring Tom Hanks, but until then no, but that person is not ID

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t

simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

I usually underestimate my abilities

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11110
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,13:49   

Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 20 2018,10:07)
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 20 2018,08:58)
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 20 2018,04:50)
 
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,23:33)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,21:05)
   
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:48)
   
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,20:10)
       
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:06)
       
Quote (CeilingCat @ Feb. 19 2018,17:13)
ID Rationality on Display™
             
Quote
3 polistra February 19, 2018 at 4:26 pm

The LHC consumes billions of dollars in an EXPLICIT attempt to obliterate the universe with a black hole. That’s all it does.

If any sanity remained in the world, the LHC should have been halted and decommissioned as soon as its purpose was clear.

Again:

And they wonder why no-one takes them seriously.

Wait- the majority of people don't take you evoTARDs seriously. And I doubt that you guys take your own position seriously. How could you seeing it is the most moronic and untestable drivel ever?

So you agree with polistra about the LHC?

Did you read ET's reply to polistra?

USA just scored another goal. 4-1 in the 3rd. Looks like the USA is going on to the quarter finals

No, I didn't.

I answered your question, now you answer mine. Quid pro quo:

I'm asking if you agree with polistra about the LHC.

Do you or don't you?

If you don't, why do you have a problem with me not taking him seriously?

Read ETs response and shut up

Okay, so you agree with ET, then.
And Olestra is wrong.
Do you think we *should* take Olestra seriously?

I am ET. And only if that person has any evidence that was the reason for the LHC and that didn't come from a movie starring Tom Hanks, but until then no, but that person is not ID

Why aren't you JoeG?

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1621
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,14:54   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 20 2018,13:49)
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 20 2018,10:07)
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 20 2018,08:58)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 20 2018,04:50)
 
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,23:33)
   
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,21:05)
   
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:48)
     
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,20:10)
       
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:06)
         
Quote (CeilingCat @ Feb. 19 2018,17:13)
ID Rationality on Display™
               
Quote
3 polistra February 19, 2018 at 4:26 pm

The LHC consumes billions of dollars in an EXPLICIT attempt to obliterate the universe with a black hole. That’s all it does.

If any sanity remained in the world, the LHC should have been halted and decommissioned as soon as its purpose was clear.

Again:

And they wonder why no-one takes them seriously.

Wait- the majority of people don't take you evoTARDs seriously. And I doubt that you guys take your own position seriously. How could you seeing it is the most moronic and untestable drivel ever?

So you agree with polistra about the LHC?

Did you read ET's reply to polistra?

USA just scored another goal. 4-1 in the 3rd. Looks like the USA is going on to the quarter finals

No, I didn't.

I answered your question, now you answer mine. Quid pro quo:

I'm asking if you agree with polistra about the LHC.

Do you or don't you?

If you don't, why do you have a problem with me not taking him seriously?

Read ETs response and shut up

Okay, so you agree with ET, then.
And Olestra is wrong.
Do you think we *should* take Olestra seriously?

I am ET. And only if that person has any evidence that was the reason for the LHC and that didn't come from a movie starring Tom Hanks, but until then no, but that person is not ID

Why aren't you JoeG?

Or Frankie, or Virgil? Did he get spanked by Barry?

  
Joe G



Posts: 5113
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,15:35   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 20 2018,14:54)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 20 2018,13:49)
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 20 2018,10:07)
 
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 20 2018,08:58)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 20 2018,04:50)
   
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,23:33)
   
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,21:05)
     
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:48)
     
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,20:10)
         
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:06)
         
Quote (CeilingCat @ Feb. 19 2018,17:13)
ID Rationality on Display™
               
Quote
3 polistra February 19, 2018 at 4:26 pm

The LHC consumes billions of dollars in an EXPLICIT attempt to obliterate the universe with a black hole. That’s all it does.

If any sanity remained in the world, the LHC should have been halted and decommissioned as soon as its purpose was clear.

Again:

And they wonder why no-one takes them seriously.

Wait- the majority of people don't take you evoTARDs seriously. And I doubt that you guys take your own position seriously. How could you seeing it is the most moronic and untestable drivel ever?

So you agree with polistra about the LHC?

Did you read ET's reply to polistra?

USA just scored another goal. 4-1 in the 3rd. Looks like the USA is going on to the quarter finals

No, I didn't.

I answered your question, now you answer mine. Quid pro quo:

I'm asking if you agree with polistra about the LHC.

Do you or don't you?

If you don't, why do you have a problem with me not taking him seriously?

Read ETs response and shut up

Okay, so you agree with ET, then.
And Olestra is wrong.
Do you think we *should* take Olestra seriously?

I am ET. And only if that person has any evidence that was the reason for the LHC and that didn't come from a movie starring Tom Hanks, but until then no, but that person is not ID

Why aren't you JoeG?

Or Frankie, or Virgil? Did he get spanked by Barry?

Why are you an evoTARD?

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t

simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

I usually underestimate my abilities

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1621
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,16:09   

Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 20 2018,15:35)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 20 2018,14:54)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 20 2018,13:49)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 20 2018,10:07)
 
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 20 2018,08:58)
   
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 20 2018,04:50)
   
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,23:33)
     
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,21:05)
     
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:48)
       
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 19 2018,20:10)
         
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 19 2018,22:06)
           
Quote (CeilingCat @ Feb. 19 2018,17:13)
ID Rationality on Display™
                 
Quote
3 polistra February 19, 2018 at 4:26 pm

The LHC consumes billions of dollars in an EXPLICIT attempt to obliterate the universe with a black hole. That’s all it does.

If any sanity remained in the world, the LHC should have been halted and decommissioned as soon as its purpose was clear.

Again:

And they wonder why no-one takes them seriously.

Wait- the majority of people don't take you evoTARDs seriously. And I doubt that you guys take your own position seriously. How could you seeing it is the most moronic and untestable drivel ever?

So you agree with polistra about the LHC?

Did you read ET's reply to polistra?

USA just scored another goal. 4-1 in the 3rd. Looks like the USA is going on to the quarter finals

No, I didn't.

I answered your question, now you answer mine. Quid pro quo:

I'm asking if you agree with polistra about the LHC.

Do you or don't you?

If you don't, why do you have a problem with me not taking him seriously?

Read ETs response and shut up

Okay, so you agree with ET, then.
And Olestra is wrong.
Do you think we *should* take Olestra seriously?

I am ET. And only if that person has any evidence that was the reason for the LHC and that didn't come from a movie starring Tom Hanks, but until then no, but that person is not ID

Why aren't you JoeG?

Or Frankie, or Virgil? Did he get spanked by Barry?

Why are you an evoTARD?

I hear that the cure for evoTARDness is to bury your nose up Mulling’s butt and repeat the same nonsense claims over and over again. I just could bring myself to demean myself the way that you do.

  
Joe G



Posts: 5113
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,16:39   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 20 2018,16:09)
I hear that the cure for evoTARDness is to bury your nose up Mulling’s butt and repeat the same nonsense claims over and over again. I just could bring myself to demean myself the way that you do.

That doesn't make any sense as all evoTARDs do is repeat the same nonsensical claims over and over again. Your entire position is one nonsensical claim after another.

You bury your heads up your own asses and repeat it ad nausea.  But that is all you have so you go with it.

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t

simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

I usually underestimate my abilities

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1621
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,17:27   

Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 20 2018,16:39)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 20 2018,16:09)
I hear that the cure for evoTARDness is to bury your nose up Mulling’s butt and repeat the same nonsense claims over and over again. I just could bring myself to demean myself the way that you do.

That doesn't make any sense as all evoTARDs do is repeat the same nonsensical claims over and over again. Your entire position is one nonsensical claim after another.

You bury your heads up your own asses and repeat it ad nausea.  But that is all you have so you go with it.

But, be honest. Don’t you get sick of shoving your nose up KairosFocus’ butt? Or does it smell like jasmin and cherry blossoms?

  
fnxtr



Posts: 2792
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,18:18   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 20 2018,15:27)
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 20 2018,16:39)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 20 2018,16:09)
I hear that the cure for evoTARDness is to bury your nose up Mulling’s butt and repeat the same nonsense claims over and over again. I just could bring myself to demean myself the way that you do.

That doesn't make any sense as all evoTARDs do is repeat the same nonsensical claims over and over again. Your entire position is one nonsensical claim after another.

You bury your heads up your own asses and repeat it ad nausea.  But that is all you have so you go with it.

But, be honest. Don’t you get sick of shoving your nose up KairosFocus’ butt? Or does it smell like jasmin and cherry blossoms?

Come on, now. What has methodological naturalism achieved in the past 200 years?

--------------
"But it's disturbing to think someone actually thinks creationism -- having put it's hand on the hot stove every day for the last 400 years -- will get a different result tomorrow." -- midwifetoad

"I am in a rush to catch up with science work." -- Gary Gaulin

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1621
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,19:09   

Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 20 2018,18:18)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 20 2018,15:27)
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 20 2018,16:39)
 
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 20 2018,16:09)
I hear that the cure for evoTARDness is to bury your nose up Mulling’s butt and repeat the same nonsense claims over and over again. I just could bring myself to demean myself the way that you do.

That doesn't make any sense as all evoTARDs do is repeat the same nonsensical claims over and over again. Your entire position is one nonsensical claim after another.

You bury your heads up your own asses and repeat it ad nausea.  But that is all you have so you go with it.

But, be honest. Don’t you get sick of shoving your nose up KairosFocus’ butt? Or does it smell like jasmin and cherry blossoms?

Come on, now. What has methodological naturalism achieved in the past 200 years?

What have the Romans...

  
Henry J



Posts: 5012
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,19:53   

Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 20 2018,17:18)
Come on, now. What has methodological naturalism achieved in the past 200 years?

Well, it brought a method to our logic, naturally.

  
Joe G



Posts: 5113
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,20:57   

Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 20 2018,18:18)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 20 2018,15:27)
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 20 2018,16:39)
 
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 20 2018,16:09)
I hear that the cure for evoTARDness is to bury your nose up Mulling’s butt and repeat the same nonsense claims over and over again. I just could bring myself to demean myself the way that you do.

That doesn't make any sense as all evoTARDs do is repeat the same nonsensical claims over and over again. Your entire position is one nonsensical claim after another.

You bury your heads up your own asses and repeat it ad nausea.  But that is all you have so you go with it.

But, be honest. Don’t you get sick of shoving your nose up KairosFocus’ butt? Or does it smell like jasmin and cherry blossoms?

Come on, now. What has methodological naturalism achieved in the past 200 years?

What? What has thinking the earth is nothing but an aggregate of cosmic debris- cosmic collisions- ever done for us?

What has thinking that living organisms arose from dirt, minerals and chemical reactions ever done for us?

What has thinking humans are just an accident in the great scheme of accidents ever done for us?

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t

simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

I usually underestimate my abilities

   
Joe G



Posts: 5113
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,20:59   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 20 2018,17:27)
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 20 2018,16:39)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 20 2018,16:09)
I hear that the cure for evoTARDness is to bury your nose up Mulling’s butt and repeat the same nonsense claims over and over again. I just could bring myself to demean myself the way that you do.

That doesn't make any sense as all evoTARDs do is repeat the same nonsensical claims over and over again. Your entire position is one nonsensical claim after another.

You bury your heads up your own asses and repeat it ad nausea.  But that is all you have so you go with it.

But, be honest. Don’t you get sick of shoving your nose up KairosFocus’ butt? Or does it smell like jasmin and cherry blossoms?

You be honest. Doesn't it suck that you are a lying loser? Or do you wear it as a badge of honor?

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t

simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

I usually underestimate my abilities

   
Joe G



Posts: 5113
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,21:01   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 20 2018,19:09)
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 20 2018,18:18)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 20 2018,15:27)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 20 2018,16:39)
 
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 20 2018,16:09)
I hear that the cure for evoTARDness is to bury your nose up Mulling’s butt and repeat the same nonsense claims over and over again. I just could bring myself to demean myself the way that you do.

That doesn't make any sense as all evoTARDs do is repeat the same nonsensical claims over and over again. Your entire position is one nonsensical claim after another.

You bury your heads up your own asses and repeat it ad nausea.  But that is all you have so you go with it.

But, be honest. Don’t you get sick of shoving your nose up KairosFocus’ butt? Or does it smell like jasmin and cherry blossoms?

Come on, now. What has methodological naturalism achieved in the past 200 years?

What have the Romans...

And the Romans didn't have any gods...

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t

simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

I usually underestimate my abilities

   
Joe G



Posts: 5113
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,21:03   

Quote (Henry J @ Feb. 20 2018,19:53)
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 20 2018,17:18)
Come on, now. What has methodological naturalism achieved in the past 200 years?

Well, it brought a method to our logic, naturally.

In what way? What research is guided by materialism and the premise the earth and us are just accidents is the great scheme of cosmic accidents?

What research relies on abiogenesis? (besides the OoL via materialistic processes)

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t

simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

I usually underestimate my abilities

   
Henry J



Posts: 5012
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,21:10   

contingent, not accident.

  
Joe G



Posts: 5113
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2018,21:28   

Quote (Henry J @ Feb. 20 2018,21:10)
contingent, not accident.

One accident is contingent on other accidents, sure. But it is all accidents.

Just think of all the just-so contingencies that had to be met to get our planet's rotation the way it is. Boggles the mind given the way the earth was allegedly formed

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t

simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

I usually underestimate my abilities

   
Joe G



Posts: 5113
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 21 2018,09:24   

Over on TSZ poster named Rumraket is a special type of TARD. It now spews that genetic algorithms model natural selection.
Quote
The method has been used to design things like windmill propellers, aircraft wings, spacecraft antennae and who knows what else.

See for example this link where a Darwinian algorithm was used to evolve a very efficient spacecraft antenna design: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki....ntenna.

Or here where a similar process was used to evolve a very efficient aircraft design: Parametric Study of a Genetic Algorithm using a Aircraft Design Optimization Problem.

So human designers DO apply the natural selection method, because it IS feasible.

Except that is all wrong. Those algorithms have pre-specified goals and are given the coding and resources to reach those goals. Natural selection doesn't have any goals beyond survival or elimination. All of those algorithms are intelligently designed to produce specific results. Natural selection isn't like that at all. The antenna algorithm was going to produce the antenna is was designed to produce and nothing else.

Genetic algorithms are clearly a case of evolution by means of intelligent design. Only a desperate and willfully ignorant person would say they apply the natural selection method.

Rummy's spewage is here

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t

simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

I usually underestimate my abilities

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11110
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 21 2018,10:53   

Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 21 2018,09:24)
Over on TSZ poster named Rumraket is a special type of TARD. It now spews that genetic algorithms model natural selection.
Quote
The method has been used to design things like windmill propellers, aircraft wings, spacecraft antennae and who knows what else.

See for example this link where a Darwinian algorithm was used to evolve a very efficient spacecraft antenna design: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......ntenna.

Or here where a similar process was used to evolve a very efficient aircraft design: Parametric Study of a Genetic Algorithm using a Aircraft Design Optimization Problem.

So human designers DO apply the natural selection method, because it IS feasible.

Except that is all wrong. Those algorithms have pre-specified goals and are given the coding and resources to reach those goals. Natural selection doesn't have any goals beyond survival or elimination. All of those algorithms are intelligently designed to produce specific results. Natural selection isn't like that at all. The antenna algorithm was going to produce the antenna is was designed to produce and nothing else.

Genetic algorithms are clearly a case of evolution by means of intelligent design. Only a desperate and willfully ignorant person would say they apply the natural selection method.

Rummy's spewage is here

Well done Joe. natural selection has a goal - survival. A model with an objective function.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Joe G



Posts: 5113
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 21 2018,11:17   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 21 2018,10:53)
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 21 2018,09:24)
Over on TSZ poster named Rumraket is a special type of TARD. It now spews that genetic algorithms model natural selection.
 
Quote
The method has been used to design things like windmill propellers, aircraft wings, spacecraft antennae and who knows what else.

See for example this link where a Darwinian algorithm was used to evolve a very efficient spacecraft antenna design: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......ntenna.

Or here where a similar process was used to evolve a very efficient aircraft design: Parametric Study of a Genetic Algorithm using a Aircraft Design Optimization Problem.

So human designers DO apply the natural selection method, because it IS feasible.

Except that is all wrong. Those algorithms have pre-specified goals and are given the coding and resources to reach those goals. Natural selection doesn't have any goals beyond survival or elimination. All of those algorithms are intelligently designed to produce specific results. Natural selection isn't like that at all. The antenna algorithm was going to produce the antenna is was designed to produce and nothing else.

Genetic algorithms are clearly a case of evolution by means of intelligent design. Only a desperate and willfully ignorant person would say they apply the natural selection method.

Rummy's spewage is here

Well done Joe. natural selection has a goal - survival. A model with an objective function.

Do rocks survive, dick?

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t

simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

I usually underestimate my abilities

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11110
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 21 2018,16:20   

Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 21 2018,11:17)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 21 2018,10:53)
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 21 2018,09:24)
Over on TSZ poster named Rumraket is a special type of TARD. It now spews that genetic algorithms model natural selection.
 
Quote
The method has been used to design things like windmill propellers, aircraft wings, spacecraft antennae and who knows what else.

See for example this link where a Darwinian algorithm was used to evolve a very efficient spacecraft antenna design: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......ntenna.

Or here where a similar process was used to evolve a very efficient aircraft design: Parametric Study of a Genetic Algorithm using a Aircraft Design Optimization Problem.

So human designers DO apply the natural selection method, because it IS feasible.

Except that is all wrong. Those algorithms have pre-specified goals and are given the coding and resources to reach those goals. Natural selection doesn't have any goals beyond survival or elimination. All of those algorithms are intelligently designed to produce specific results. Natural selection isn't like that at all. The antenna algorithm was going to produce the antenna is was designed to produce and nothing else.

Genetic algorithms are clearly a case of evolution by means of intelligent design. Only a desperate and willfully ignorant person would say they apply the natural selection method.

Rummy's spewage is here

Well done Joe. natural selection has a goal - survival. A model with an objective function.

Do rocks survive, dick?

in their natural environment, your head.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Joe G



Posts: 5113
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 21 2018,20:22   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 21 2018,16:20)
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 21 2018,11:17)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 21 2018,10:53)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 21 2018,09:24)
Over on TSZ poster named Rumraket is a special type of TARD. It now spews that genetic algorithms model natural selection.
   
Quote
The method has been used to design things like windmill propellers, aircraft wings, spacecraft antennae and who knows what else.

See for example this link where a Darwinian algorithm was used to evolve a very efficient spacecraft antenna design: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......ntenna.

Or here where a similar process was used to evolve a very efficient aircraft design: Parametric Study of a Genetic Algorithm using a Aircraft Design Optimization Problem.

So human designers DO apply the natural selection method, because it IS feasible.

Except that is all wrong. Those algorithms have pre-specified goals and are given the coding and resources to reach those goals. Natural selection doesn't have any goals beyond survival or elimination. All of those algorithms are intelligently designed to produce specific results. Natural selection isn't like that at all. The antenna algorithm was going to produce the antenna is was designed to produce and nothing else.

Genetic algorithms are clearly a case of evolution by means of intelligent design. Only a desperate and willfully ignorant person would say they apply the natural selection method.

Rummy's spewage is here

Well done Joe. natural selection has a goal - survival. A model with an objective function.

Do rocks survive, dick?

in their natural environment, your head.

So the rocks that are not in my head are not in their natural environment? Are they in a supernatural environment? Do they survive?

And moar importantly what would be the model with an objective function for rock survival in my head and in that supernatural environment?

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t

simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

I usually underestimate my abilities

   
  15374 replies since Feb. 24 2010,12:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (513) < ... 372 373 374 375 376 [377] 378 379 380 381 382 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]