RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (339) < ... 309 310 311 312 313 [314] 315 316 317 318 319 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 5, Return To Teh Dingbat Buffet< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
stevestory



Posts: 10820
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 15 2018,11:41   

Quote
214
JSmithJanuary 15, 2018 at 9:59 am
J
Quote

I doubt that anything will change for the better though because most of you here only seem to care about promoting your religious/cultural’/political viewpoints.

Since ID appears incapable of separating itself from its founding religion, I have to agree with you.
Quote

215
JSmithJanuary 15, 2018 at 10:06 am
KF
Quote

Jul3s, pardon some observations. UD is not solely about strictly scientific topics and while indeed we often look at science and tech news and will do more of that as time goes on there are other relevant topics.

Pardon an observation. Over 80% of traffic at UD over the last thirty days have had absolutely nothing to do with science or ID.


link

Edited by stevestory on Jan. 15 2018,12:42

   
stevestory



Posts: 10820
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 15 2018,12:44   

Quote
233
OldAndrewJanuary 15, 2018 at 11:42 am
Quote
I never said that Aristotle = reason or vice versa.

Then what did you mean by this, when the only “reason” I’ve spoken against is faith in the teachings of Aristotle?
Quote

your obvious disdain for reason prevents you from making critical distinctions… The bible tells us to use our reason, but you ignore the point because for some reason you think reason is the enemy of scripture

When you said that I reject reason, were you referring to my rejection of Aristotle or not? If you implied that I rejected reason outright, you were being dishonest then. If you were referring to my rejection of Aristotle you’re being dishonest now.
feel the burn

Edited by stevestory on Jan. 15 2018,13:45

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1595
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 15 2018,13:06   

This thread is becoming surreal. OldAndrew chastises them for talking too much about religion and scriptures, and then drags them into drawn-out discussion on religion and scriptures.

KF and SB can't see the bait for the hook in their mouths.

  
stevestory



Posts: 10820
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 15 2018,13:32   

Whoever OldAndrew is, he/she's brilliant at sucker punching them.

   
stevestory



Posts: 10820
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 15 2018,13:36   

I've never found a gathering of fools funnier than UD. They're like the 3 stooges wearing lab coats.

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1595
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 15 2018,14:30   

Quote (stevestory @ Jan. 15 2018,13:36)
I've never found a gathering of fools funnier than UD. They're like the 3 stooges wearing lab coats.

Barry is obviously the bully Moe. And KF could fit into the know-it-all Larry role. And WJM....

Wait just a minute. We are going to run out of Stooges.

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1595
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 15 2018,14:38   

Quote
JSmith January 15, 2018 at 2:26 pm
SB

Quote
No, I am asking what those men did to insure the integrity of the Gospels.


I expect they took out Errors and Omissions insurance just like other organizations.

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1595
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 15 2018,17:06   

I think that KF must be off his meds again. Can anyone explain this mess?
Quote
DiEb, you continue, sadly. I note for record, that it is fairly clear that Internet statistics are a high noise environment. By 2012, relevant dominance of segments had happened, and as a result UD was in the top 1% of sites. Nothing existential or changing the rules has happened since then and the basic pattern is robust. This is nothing to do with “fake but accurate” biased news talking points. The relevant TANG case there was a demonstrable fraud — superposing the alleged letter with a doc prepared using Word on a Mac gives a match where relevant typography did not exist in the early-mid ’70’s — in the context of a wider slander: fighter jets of the Century series in the relevant era [F102] had quite high crash and fatality rates and routinely flew in effect nuke war CAP, Texas etc being near to Cuba. Likewise, the mere fact of passing tests to be trained as a fighter pilot has several implications including IQ 120+. By speaking to this you are apparently still pushing the idea of a bogus — fraudulent — rating scheme. I do not see good reason to concur with that, as I already pointed out. KF


Straight jacket 171

  
k.e..



Posts: 4523
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 15 2018,18:14   

Quote (stevestory @ Jan. 15 2018,19:38)
 
Quote
224
OldAndrewJanuary 15, 2018 at 11:05 am
 
Quote
The decision about which books qualify as scripture and which ones do was made in the 4th century. How do you suppose that decision was made?

Do you worship a God who can create life but can’t ensure that a few dozen books he inspired can’t be kept intact and separated from the ones he didn’t? You’re right, that’s way too hard for God. Maybe he should have asked Aristotle for help.
Linky McLinkface


Are you a TRUE SCOTSMAN KF??

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
Henry J



Posts: 4983
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 15 2018,18:47   

Only if he has a kilt and bagpipes.

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1595
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 15 2018,22:54   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 15 2018,17:06)
I think that KF must be off his meds again. Can anyone explain this mess?
Quote
DiEb, you continue, sadly. I note for record, that it is fairly clear that Internet statistics are a high noise environment. By 2012, relevant dominance of segments had happened, and as a result UD was in the top 1% of sites. Nothing existential or changing the rules has happened since then and the basic pattern is robust. This is nothing to do with “fake but accurate” biased news talking points. The relevant TANG case there was a demonstrable fraud — superposing the alleged letter with a doc prepared using Word on a Mac gives a match where relevant typography did not exist in the early-mid ’70’s — in the context of a wider slander: fighter jets of the Century series in the relevant era [F102] had quite high crash and fatality rates and routinely flew in effect nuke war CAP, Texas etc being near to Cuba. Likewise, the mere fact of passing tests to be trained as a fighter pilot has several implications including IQ 120+. By speaking to this you are apparently still pushing the idea of a bogus — fraudulent — rating scheme. I do not see good reason to concur with that, as I already pointed out. KF


Straight jacket 171

No
Longer a need to explain. He pulled a classic KF and closed out commenting when the comments got too rational.

  
k.e..



Posts: 4523
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 15 2018,23:07   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,06:54)
 
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 15 2018,17:06)
I think that KF must be off his meds again. Can anyone explain this mess?
   
Quote
DiEb, you continue, sadly. I note for record, that it is fairly clear that Internet statistics are a high noise environment. By 2012, relevant dominance of segments had happened, and as a result UD was in the top 1% of sites. Nothing existential or changing the rules has happened since then and the basic pattern is robust. This is nothing to do with “fake but accurate” biased news talking points. The relevant TANG case there was a demonstrable fraud — superposing the alleged letter with a doc prepared using Word on a Mac gives a match where relevant typography did not exist in the early-mid ’70’s — in the context of a wider slander: fighter jets of the Century series in the relevant era [F102] had quite high crash and fatality rates and routinely flew in effect nuke war CAP, Texas etc being near to Cuba. Likewise, the mere fact of passing tests to be trained as a fighter pilot has several implications including IQ 120+. By speaking to this you are apparently still pushing the idea of a bogus — fraudulent — rating scheme. I do not see good reason to concur with that, as I already pointed out. KF


Straight jacket 171

No
Longer a need to explain. He pulled a classic KF and closed out commenting when the comments got too rational.

That would make him a True Creationist (in a cheap ID kilt).

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
DiEb



Posts: 284
Joined: May 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,00:08   

Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 16 2018,05:07)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,06:54)
 
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 15 2018,17:06)
I think that KF must be off his meds again. Can anyone explain this mess?
   
Quote
DiEb, you continue, sadly. I note for record, that it is fairly clear that Internet statistics are a high noise environment. By 2012, relevant dominance of segments had happened, and as a result UD was in the top 1% of sites. Nothing existential or changing the rules has happened since then and the basic pattern is robust. This is nothing to do with “fake but accurate” biased news talking points. The relevant TANG case there was a demonstrable fraud — superposing the alleged letter with a doc prepared using Word on a Mac gives a match where relevant typography did not exist in the early-mid ’70’s — in the context of a wider slander: fighter jets of the Century series in the relevant era [F102] had quite high crash and fatality rates and routinely flew in effect nuke war CAP, Texas etc being near to Cuba. Likewise, the mere fact of passing tests to be trained as a fighter pilot has several implications including IQ 120+. By speaking to this you are apparently still pushing the idea of a bogus — fraudulent — rating scheme. I do not see good reason to concur with that, as I already pointed out. KF


Straight jacket 171

No
Longer a need to explain. He pulled a classic KF and closed out commenting when the comments got too rational.

That would make him a True Creationist (in a cheap ID kilt).

Memogate was perhaps the proudest moment for right-wing grassroot internet warriors of the early 2000s - the alt-right before there was an alt-right.

It was certainly one defining moment in the development which lead to the "fake media" frenzy of today.

"Fake, but accurate" triggers the memories for them, so it is doubly outrageous when opponents bring up the meme to make a point.

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1595
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,00:28   

Quote (DiEb @ Jan. 16 2018,00:08)
Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 16 2018,05:07)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,06:54)
   
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 15 2018,17:06)
I think that KF must be off his meds again. Can anyone explain this mess?
     
Quote
DiEb, you continue, sadly. I note for record, that it is fairly clear that Internet statistics are a high noise environment. By 2012, relevant dominance of segments had happened, and as a result UD was in the top 1% of sites. Nothing existential or changing the rules has happened since then and the basic pattern is robust. This is nothing to do with “fake but accurate” biased news talking points. The relevant TANG case there was a demonstrable fraud — superposing the alleged letter with a doc prepared using Word on a Mac gives a match where relevant typography did not exist in the early-mid ’70’s — in the context of a wider slander: fighter jets of the Century series in the relevant era [F102] had quite high crash and fatality rates and routinely flew in effect nuke war CAP, Texas etc being near to Cuba. Likewise, the mere fact of passing tests to be trained as a fighter pilot has several implications including IQ 120+. By speaking to this you are apparently still pushing the idea of a bogus — fraudulent — rating scheme. I do not see good reason to concur with that, as I already pointed out. KF


Straight jacket 171

No
Longer a need to explain. He pulled a classic KF and closed out commenting when the comments got too rational.

That would make him a True Creationist (in a cheap ID kilt).

Memogate was perhaps the proudest moment for right-wing grassroot internet warriors of the early 2000s - the alt-right before there was an alt-right.

It was certainly one defining moment in the development which lead to the "fake media" frenzy of today.

"Fake, but accurate" triggers the memories for them, so it is doubly outrageous when opponents bring up the meme to make a point.

DiEB, did you make KF blow a gasket?

  
DiEb



Posts: 284
Joined: May 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,00:37   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,06:28)
Quote (DiEb @ Jan. 16 2018,00:08)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 16 2018,05:07)
 
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,06:54)
     
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 15 2018,17:06)
I think that KF must be off his meds again. Can anyone explain this mess?
       
Quote
DiEb, you continue, sadly. I note for record, that it is fairly clear that Internet statistics are a high noise environment. By 2012, relevant dominance of segments had happened, and as a result UD was in the top 1% of sites. Nothing existential or changing the rules has happened since then and the basic pattern is robust. This is nothing to do with “fake but accurate” biased news talking points. The relevant TANG case there was a demonstrable fraud — superposing the alleged letter with a doc prepared using Word on a Mac gives a match where relevant typography did not exist in the early-mid ’70’s — in the context of a wider slander: fighter jets of the Century series in the relevant era [F102] had quite high crash and fatality rates and routinely flew in effect nuke war CAP, Texas etc being near to Cuba. Likewise, the mere fact of passing tests to be trained as a fighter pilot has several implications including IQ 120+. By speaking to this you are apparently still pushing the idea of a bogus — fraudulent — rating scheme. I do not see good reason to concur with that, as I already pointed out. KF


Straight jacket 171

No
Longer a need to explain. He pulled a classic KF and closed out commenting when the comments got too rational.

That would make him a True Creationist (in a cheap ID kilt).

Memogate was perhaps the proudest moment for right-wing grassroot internet warriors of the early 2000s - the alt-right before there was an alt-right.

It was certainly one defining moment in the development which lead to the "fake media" frenzy of today.

"Fake, but accurate" triggers the memories for them, so it is doubly outrageous when opponents bring up the meme to make a point.

DiEB, did you make KF blow a gasket?

Well, save to say, I had more fun on the thread than he had - it is always a warning sign when he stops to use paragraphs...

But I think that my main point stands: there are two equally true narratives which describe the whole thread:

Quote
1. In a post in January 2017, KF showed that the website UncommonDescent.com belonged to the top 1% of the most popular sites of the web. This was proved by using data from rating.com, and in subsequent comments by data from alexa.


Quote
2. In January 2017, KF claimed that UncommonDescent.com belonged to the 100,000 most popular sites on the web (“something in the 80,000’s”). Later data from alexa showed that UD’s ranking is much lower – in the 600,000’s! He came up with the flattering ranking by using outdated material from a website called ranking.com, an organization which promulgated malware according to McAffee and other virus scanners, but which was classified by KF as “a legitimate and longstanding corporation”. Though KF later found out that his data was years out of date, he never corrected his original post.


KF added only material to support the first narrative, but added nothing to disprove the second one. He could have done so by throwing out the rankings from ranking.com, but that meant that he had to admit that he was duped (by a website which seems to want to dupe its visitors).

Edited by DiEb on Jan. 16 2018,06:38

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1595
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,00:43   

Quote (DiEb @ Jan. 16 2018,00:37)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,06:28)
 
Quote (DiEb @ Jan. 16 2018,00:08)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 16 2018,05:07)
   
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,06:54)
     
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 15 2018,17:06)
I think that KF must be off his meds again. Can anyone explain this mess?
       
Quote
DiEb, you continue, sadly. I note for record, that it is fairly clear that Internet statistics are a high noise environment. By 2012, relevant dominance of segments had happened, and as a result UD was in the top 1% of sites. Nothing existential or changing the rules has happened since then and the basic pattern is robust. This is nothing to do with “fake but accurate” biased news talking points. The relevant TANG case there was a demonstrable fraud — superposing the alleged letter with a doc prepared using Word on a Mac gives a match where relevant typography did not exist in the early-mid ’70’s — in the context of a wider slander: fighter jets of the Century series in the relevant era [F102] had quite high crash and fatality rates and routinely flew in effect nuke war CAP, Texas etc being near to Cuba. Likewise, the mere fact of passing tests to be trained as a fighter pilot has several implications including IQ 120+. By speaking to this you are apparently still pushing the idea of a bogus — fraudulent — rating scheme. I do not see good reason to concur with that, as I already pointed out. KF


Straight jacket 171

No
Longer a need to explain. He pulled a classic KF and closed out commenting when the comments got too rational.

That would make him a True Creationist (in a cheap ID kilt).

Memogate was perhaps the proudest moment for right-wing grassroot internet warriors of the early 2000s - the alt-right before there was an alt-right.

It was certainly one defining moment in the development which lead to the "fake media" frenzy of today.

"Fake, but accurate" triggers the memories for them, so it is doubly outrageous when opponents bring up the meme to make a point.

DiEB, did you make KF blow a gasket?

Well, save to say, I had more fun on the thread than he had - it is always a warning sign when he stops to use paragraphs...

But I think that my main point stands: there are two equally true narratives which describe the whole thread:

 
Quote
1. In a post in January 2017, KF showed that the website UncommonDescent.com belonged to the top 1% of the most popular sites of the web. This was proved by using data from rating.com, and in subsequent comments by data from alexa.


 
Quote
2. In January 2017, KF claimed that UncommonDescent.com belonged to the 100,000 most popular sites on the web (“something in the 80,000’s”). Later data from alexa showed that UD’s ranking is much lower – in the 600,000’s! He came up with the flattering ranking by using outdated material from a website called ranking.com, an organization which promulgated malware according to McAffee and other virus scanners, but which was classified by KF as “a legitimate and longstanding corporation”. Though KF later found out that his data was years out of date, he never corrected his original post.


KF added only material to support the first narrative, but added nothing to disprove the second one. He could have done so by throwing out the rankings from ranking.com, but that meant that he had to admit that he was duped (by a website which seems to want to dupe its visitors).

He also ignored the fact that the web site godhatesfags.com was twice as popular as UD using Rankings.com.

  
DiEb



Posts: 284
Joined: May 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,00:45   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,06:43)
Quote (DiEb @ Jan. 16 2018,00:37)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,06:28)
 
Quote (DiEb @ Jan. 16 2018,00:08)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 16 2018,05:07)
   
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,06:54)
       
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 15 2018,17:06)
I think that KF must be off his meds again. Can anyone explain this mess?
         
Quote
DiEb, you continue, sadly. I note for record, that it is fairly clear that Internet statistics are a high noise environment. By 2012, relevant dominance of segments had happened, and as a result UD was in the top 1% of sites. Nothing existential or changing the rules has happened since then and the basic pattern is robust. This is nothing to do with “fake but accurate” biased news talking points. The relevant TANG case there was a demonstrable fraud — superposing the alleged letter with a doc prepared using Word on a Mac gives a match where relevant typography did not exist in the early-mid ’70’s — in the context of a wider slander: fighter jets of the Century series in the relevant era [F102] had quite high crash and fatality rates and routinely flew in effect nuke war CAP, Texas etc being near to Cuba. Likewise, the mere fact of passing tests to be trained as a fighter pilot has several implications including IQ 120+. By speaking to this you are apparently still pushing the idea of a bogus — fraudulent — rating scheme. I do not see good reason to concur with that, as I already pointed out. KF


Straight jacket 171

No
Longer a need to explain. He pulled a classic KF and closed out commenting when the comments got too rational.

That would make him a True Creationist (in a cheap ID kilt).

Memogate was perhaps the proudest moment for right-wing grassroot internet warriors of the early 2000s - the alt-right before there was an alt-right.

It was certainly one defining moment in the development which lead to the "fake media" frenzy of today.

"Fake, but accurate" triggers the memories for them, so it is doubly outrageous when opponents bring up the meme to make a point.

DiEB, did you make KF blow a gasket?

Well, save to say, I had more fun on the thread than he had - it is always a warning sign when he stops to use paragraphs...

But I think that my main point stands: there are two equally true narratives which describe the whole thread:

 
Quote
1. In a post in January 2017, KF showed that the website UncommonDescent.com belonged to the top 1% of the most popular sites of the web. This was proved by using data from rating.com, and in subsequent comments by data from alexa.


 
Quote
2. In January 2017, KF claimed that UncommonDescent.com belonged to the 100,000 most popular sites on the web (“something in the 80,000’s”). Later data from alexa showed that UD’s ranking is much lower – in the 600,000’s! He came up with the flattering ranking by using outdated material from a website called ranking.com, an organization which promulgated malware according to McAffee and other virus scanners, but which was classified by KF as “a legitimate and longstanding corporation”. Though KF later found out that his data was years out of date, he never corrected his original post.


KF added only material to support the first narrative, but added nothing to disprove the second one. He could have done so by throwing out the rankings from ranking.com, but that meant that he had to admit that he was duped (by a website which seems to want to dupe its visitors).

He also ignored the fact that the web site godhatesfags.com was twice as popular as UD using Rankings.com.

That's not a problem, as GOD HATE FAGS - just ask Mike Pence....

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1595
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,00:52   

Quote (DiEb @ Jan. 16 2018,00:45)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,06:43)
Quote (DiEb @ Jan. 16 2018,00:37)
 
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,06:28)
   
Quote (DiEb @ Jan. 16 2018,00:08)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 16 2018,05:07)
     
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,06:54)
       
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 15 2018,17:06)
I think that KF must be off his meds again. Can anyone explain this mess?
         
Quote
DiEb, you continue, sadly. I note for record, that it is fairly clear that Internet statistics are a high noise environment. By 2012, relevant dominance of segments had happened, and as a result UD was in the top 1% of sites. Nothing existential or changing the rules has happened since then and the basic pattern is robust. This is nothing to do with “fake but accurate” biased news talking points. The relevant TANG case there was a demonstrable fraud — superposing the alleged letter with a doc prepared using Word on a Mac gives a match where relevant typography did not exist in the early-mid ’70’s — in the context of a wider slander: fighter jets of the Century series in the relevant era [F102] had quite high crash and fatality rates and routinely flew in effect nuke war CAP, Texas etc being near to Cuba. Likewise, the mere fact of passing tests to be trained as a fighter pilot has several implications including IQ 120+. By speaking to this you are apparently still pushing the idea of a bogus — fraudulent — rating scheme. I do not see good reason to concur with that, as I already pointed out. KF


Straight jacket 171

No
Longer a need to explain. He pulled a classic KF and closed out commenting when the comments got too rational.

That would make him a True Creationist (in a cheap ID kilt).

Memogate was perhaps the proudest moment for right-wing grassroot internet warriors of the early 2000s - the alt-right before there was an alt-right.

It was certainly one defining moment in the development which lead to the "fake media" frenzy of today.

"Fake, but accurate" triggers the memories for them, so it is doubly outrageous when opponents bring up the meme to make a point.

DiEB, did you make KF blow a gasket?

Well, save to say, I had more fun on the thread than he had - it is always a warning sign when he stops to use paragraphs...

But I think that my main point stands: there are two equally true narratives which describe the whole thread:

   
Quote
1. In a post in January 2017, KF showed that the website UncommonDescent.com belonged to the top 1% of the most popular sites of the web. This was proved by using data from rating.com, and in subsequent comments by data from alexa.


   
Quote
2. In January 2017, KF claimed that UncommonDescent.com belonged to the 100,000 most popular sites on the web (“something in the 80,000’s”). Later data from alexa showed that UD’s ranking is much lower – in the 600,000’s! He came up with the flattering ranking by using outdated material from a website called ranking.com, an organization which promulgated malware according to McAffee and other virus scanners, but which was classified by KF as “a legitimate and longstanding corporation”. Though KF later found out that his data was years out of date, he never corrected his original post.


KF added only material to support the first narrative, but added nothing to disprove the second one. He could have done so by throwing out the rankings from ranking.com, but that meant that he had to admit that he was duped (by a website which seems to want to dupe its visitors).

He also ignored the fact that the web site godhatesfags.com was twice as popular as UD using Rankings.com.

That's not a problem, as GOD HATE FAGS - just ask Mike Pence....

As does KF.

It is so much fun getting him wound up. Unfortunately, it usually ends up in me burning a sock. But I have several in the works that KF hasn’t figured out yet.

Cue the KF witch hunt for agit-prop, atheist-materialist, nihilist, strawman erecting, red herring milking, fellow travelers of my ilk over at UD.

  
k.e..



Posts: 4523
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,09:42   

Red  Herrings are  mammals? Damm does that disprove. ..... damn let's  hope kf hasn't SMELT a rat!

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1595
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,10:00   

Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 16 2018,09:42)
Red  Herrings are  mammals? Damm does that disprove. ..... damn let's  hope kf hasn't SMELT a rat!

Don't worry, I am sure that Joe will put him in his plaice.

  
DiEb



Posts: 284
Joined: May 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,10:17   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,16:00)
Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 16 2018,09:42)
Red  Herrings are  mammals? Damm does that disprove. ..... damn let's  hope kf hasn't SMELT a rat!

Don't worry, I am sure that Joe will put him in his plaice.

Sorry, I'm not into this fishing for puns.

   
Henry J



Posts: 4983
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,10:24   

Quote (DiEb @ Jan. 16 2018,09:17)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,16:00)
Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 16 2018,09:42)
Red  Herrings are  mammals? Damm does that disprove. ..... damn let's  hope kf hasn't SMELT a rat!

Don't worry, I am sure that Joe will put him in his plaice.

Sorry, I'm not into this fishing for puns.

Yeah, let's look for some gnu ones.

  
DiEb



Posts: 284
Joined: May 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,10:30   

Quote (Henry J @ Jan. 16 2018,16:24)
Quote (DiEb @ Jan. 16 2018,09:17)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,16:00)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 16 2018,09:42)
Red  Herrings are  mammals? Damm does that disprove. ..... damn let's  hope kf hasn't SMELT a rat!

Don't worry, I am sure that Joe will put him in his plaice.

Sorry, I'm not into this fishing for puns.

Yeah, let's look for some gnu ones.

Carp, there we go again...

   
Texas Teach



Posts: 1609
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,10:42   

Quote (Henry J @ Jan. 16 2018,10:24)
Quote (DiEb @ Jan. 16 2018,09:17)
 
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,16:00)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 16 2018,09:42)
Red  Herrings are  mammals? Damm does that disprove. ..... damn let's  hope kf hasn't SMELT a rat!

Don't worry, I am sure that Joe will put him in his plaice.

Sorry, I'm not into this fishing for puns.

Yeah, let's look for some gnu ones.

I zebra you did there.

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1595
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,11:10   

Quote (Texas Teach @ Jan. 16 2018,10:42)
Quote (Henry J @ Jan. 16 2018,10:24)
 
Quote (DiEb @ Jan. 16 2018,09:17)
 
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,16:00)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 16 2018,09:42)
Red  Herrings are  mammals? Damm does that disprove. ..... damn let's  hope kf hasn't SMELT a rat!

Don't worry, I am sure that Joe will put him in his plaice.

Sorry, I'm not into this fishing for puns.

Yeah, let's look for some gnu ones.

I zebra you did there.

Let me mullings that one over.

  
Tony M Nyphot



Posts: 394
Joined: June 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,11:47   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,10:10)
Quote (Texas Teach @ Jan. 16 2018,10:42)
Quote (Henry J @ Jan. 16 2018,10:24)
 
Quote (DiEb @ Jan. 16 2018,09:17)
   
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,16:00)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 16 2018,09:42)
Red  Herrings are  mammals? Damm does that disprove. ..... damn let's  hope kf hasn't SMELT a rat!

Don't worry, I am sure that Joe will put him in his plaice.

Sorry, I'm not into this fishing for puns.

Yeah, let's look for some gnu ones.

I zebra you did there.

Let me mullings that one over.

Careful, or you'll cause k.e. to get a gourd on.

--------------
"I, OTOH, am an underachiever...I either pee my pants or faint dead away..." FTK

"You could always wrap fresh fish in the paper you publish it on, though, and sell that." - Field Man on how to find value in Gary Gaulin's real-science "theory"

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1595
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,12:24   

Quote (Tony M Nyphot @ Jan. 16 2018,11:47)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,10:10)
Quote (Texas Teach @ Jan. 16 2018,10:42)
 
Quote (Henry J @ Jan. 16 2018,10:24)
   
Quote (DiEb @ Jan. 16 2018,09:17)
   
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Jan. 16 2018,16:00)
     
Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 16 2018,09:42)
Red  Herrings are  mammals? Damm does that disprove. ..... damn let's  hope kf hasn't SMELT a rat!

Don't worry, I am sure that Joe will put him in his plaice.

Sorry, I'm not into this fishing for puns.

Yeah, let's look for some gnu ones.

I zebra you did there.

Let me mullings that one over.

Careful, or you'll cause k.e. to get a gourd on.

And he better stay away from Montserrat or he might get a MELLONoma.

  
stevestory



Posts: 10820
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,12:32   

Every now and then, this board gets 'Tarded. But listen -there's plenty of 'tards out there living really kickass lives.  My first wife was retarded and she's a pilot.

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1595
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,12:52   

Quote (stevestory @ Jan. 16 2018,12:32)
Every now and then, this board gets 'Tarded. But listen -there's plenty of 'tards out there living really kickass lives.  My first wife was retarded and she's a pilot.

But can she fix a toaster?

  
stevestory



Posts: 10820
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2018,13:28   

For $100 apparently.  :p

   
  10141 replies since Dec. 29 2013,11:01 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (339) < ... 309 310 311 312 313 [314] 315 316 317 318 319 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]