Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > Uncommonly Dense Thread 4

Pages: (356) < ... 212 213 214 215 216 [217] 218 219 220 221 222 ... >

Erasmus, FCD Posts: 6349 Joined: June 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 13 2012,10:33    OK I'll tally at lunch and post the results. Last chance to vote!  I will make an effort to scan this thread and compile responses of those WHO DID NOT FOLLOW THE RULES lololol -------------- You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

Erasmus, FCD Posts: 6349 Joined: June 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 13 2012,14:56    I received 29 replies, including a few here and there that I ferreted out of the thread.   Unfortunately, there was a tie.  I have chosen to break this tie by casting my vote for AFDave. AFDave-  6 votes Several of you provided hilarious reasons for why you consider AFDave the top tard OF.ALL.TIME. but this one was such a fantastic summary that I included it en toto. Quote I have to nominate AFDave. Dave has so many qualities that rank him so much higher than yer snarling, snivelling Joes, Dembski's voguing in a white-coat, the apoplectic psychopathy of Gordo, or the chest-pounding, belly-quaking bar-room bluster of DaveTard. Densye is simply dull, even with her occasionally sig-worthy inanities. Dave, on the other hand, is unfailingly cheerful and enthusiastic in presenting his argument. He has read his Trusted Sources, and he knows they're Right. He presents us with this path to enlightenment confident that, misguided as we are, we must be persuaded by the impeccably sourced and acutely argued case he makes. When his opponents and adversaries point out the sundry flaws, omissions and gullible-isn't-in-the-dictionary class howlers, Dave always obliges with the Maginot Line response: miles of elaborately constructed, impregnable defences focused on a point entirely remote from where the attack came from. No statement is so spherically wrong that Dave will not defend it to the last. No quote-mine is so egregious that Dave will fail to point out that it uses precisely the same alphabet as the original. Every accusation of stealing cookies will be denounced with a crescendo of denial and a spray of crumbs. The game will continue for pages, for weeks, but not once will Dave fail to defend The Truth and the unimpeachable accuracy and sagacity of his Authoritative Sources. What truly distinguishes Dave from other creotards is the unbridled enthusiasm with which he will launch one fractally stupid argument after another, all in the cause of The Truth. Daniel steps into the lions' den, clad in his armour of bacon. Dave has found his divine calling, and it is us. ahhhh, yes, the good old days back when the tard was liquid Next up is Gordon E. Mullings, the child pornography collector, white knight of the internet, protector of the constitution of carribean rocks, loquacious twat, unethical liar for jesus.  5 votes   Quote entertainment incarnate   Quote absolute cunt with no redeeming features whatsoever   Quote red herrings and strawmen soaked in adhominem oil   Quote latchinating DaveTard was next with 4 votes.     Quote inventor of the floating command center and experimenter with mushrooms. The marines are still praying for him - especially the ones that work at Dell.   Quote wealth, breadth and Janibelle Dr.Dr. BillyBilly Dumpski got 3 votes.   Quote supreme tard creator   Quote There is nobody as blind, pathetic, myopic, yet convinced they are right in the annals of annals… He is the alph and the omega of tard with a beta-version of brains.  The yin and the yang and the yo-yo of tard.  He can throw out big words like a true pedant, but believe in angels.  He can debate Christopher Hitchens badly, but believe in his black little heart that he won.   ahhhh yes Next, Gildo got 2 votes.  How pathetic he is.  I think one of these was a sympathy vote because of the frilly shirt.   Quote He's got it all: stupidity, arrogance, cognitive dissonance, science envy, extreme Oedipal issues, questionable emotional stability and raging insecurity. Tards tallying one vote each David Berlinski-Berlinski   Quote best ID interviewer of hisself in the 3rd person gpuccio   Quote he has no excuse for being such a fool ilion   Quote "wandering jew award" jerry   Quote PM Yourself, you magnificent bastard Joy Busey   Quote belligerent stupidity and synesthetic cock-surety Casey Luskin Phillip Johnson Robert Byers   Quote endless supply of ignorance, xenophobia, bigotry and misogyny all contained within a semiliterate fundy YEC wrapper of broken english and nonsequitor. Theistoclast   Quote sheer longevity and intractability William Wallace Thanks for playing! Edited by Lou FCD on Sep. 13 2012,19:42 -------------- You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

Richardthughes Posts: 11178 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 13 2012,15:01    PotW, obviously. You could read UD for years and know no more than what is contained in that post. -------------- "Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield "You magnificent bastard! " : Louis "ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard "I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932 "...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

J-Dog Posts: 4402 Joined: Dec. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 13 2012,16:19    Quote (Richardthughes @ Sep. 13 2012,15:01) PotW, obviously. You could read UD for years and know no more than what is contained in that post. Second The Motion!   You can also sum up UD with the mantra "So many tards - so little time." Or even Have Fun With The UD Tard:  "So much stupidity from such little minds". -------------- Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10 Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08 UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

Richardthughes Posts: 11178 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 13 2012,16:33    Bwahahahah - Joe G not even on the radar! EVOTARDGASMS!!!!1111one -------------- "Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield "You magnificent bastard! " : Louis "ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard "I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932 "...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

NormOlsen Posts: 104 Joined: Nov. 2011 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 13 2012,16:41    Semi OT: What, not a single vote for BA77?! Other notes: Seriously, not one? Music, video, and verse: Denis Leary - I'm an asshole - with lyrics. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v....N2KAaww PS: Quantum entanglement! I win!

Amadan Posts: 1337 Joined: Jan. 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 13 2012,16:50    Ras, you have done the cause some service. PM yourself. -------------- "People are always looking for natural selection to generate random mutations" - Densye  4-4-2011 JoeG BTW dumbass- some variations help ensure reproductive fitness so they cannot be random wrt it.

Freddie Posts: 371 Joined: Oct. 2009 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 13 2012,17:10    Yep, PoTW! Can we do it again next week? -------------- Joe: Most criticisims of ID stem from ignorance and jealousy. Joe: As for the authors of the books in the Bible, well the OT was authored by Moses and the NT was authored by various people. Byers: The eskimo would not need hairy hair growth as hair, I say, is for keeping people dry. Not warm.

Soapy Sam Posts: 659 Joined: Jan. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 13 2012,17:15    Quote (Richardthughes @ Sep. 13 2012,16:33) Bwahahahah - Joe G not even on the radar! EVOTARDGASMS!!!!1111one Yes, I am surprised that Joey One-Note did not get an honourable mention, given the size of his very own thread. Perhaps he's just very quote-able. I went for KF, Joe was my #2. Call the Electoral Reform Society. -------------- SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G BTW, when you make little jabs like “I thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,” you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington

JohnW Posts: 3217 Joined: Aug. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 13 2012,17:37    Quote (Soapy Sam @ Sep. 13 2012,15:15) Quote (Richardthughes @ Sep. 13 2012,16:33) Bwahahahah - Joe G not even on the radar! EVOTARDGASMS!!!!1111one Yes, I am surprised that Joey One-Note did not get an honourable mention, given the size of his very own thread. Perhaps he's just very quote-able. I went for KF, Joe was my #2. Call the Electoral Reform Society. Joe loses points for being boring.  Batshit77 loses more points for being more boring. I voted for afdave as the best all-round entertainer - stupidity, arrogance and a near-terminal case of Dunning-Kruger on all subjects. Honorable mentions: Byers and Gordon. -------------- Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

REC Posts: 638 Joined: Sep. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 13 2012,18:47    Was this poll the post-mortem on UD?* They can't seem to get posts up on the front page (or they like it that way) and the only post in the RSS feed for the last few days at first glance looks like KF is schooling the others on TV repair. *No, I don't think it will go away. But it is dead. Has been for a while, but keeps coming back like some stinking undying zombie corpse, and a little worse off each time. Admit that we're just watching to see what miserable freak-show will pop up next? A poll on (dear-god what is that thing) what the next incarnation will be?

Erasmus, FCD Posts: 6349 Joined: June 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 13 2012,19:05    coupla folks voted for joe as second or third choice but i only tallied first place votes.  fuck multi-metrics -------------- You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

Timothy McDougald Posts: 1036 Joined: Dec. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 13 2012,19:28    I'm suprised no one mentioned Egnor. -------------- Church burning ebola boy FTK: I Didn't answer your questions because it beats the hell out of me. PaV: I suppose for me to be pried away from what I do to focus long and hard on that particular problem would take, quite honestly, hundreds of thousands of dollars to begin to pique my interest.

keiths Posts: 2195 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 13 2012,21:05    Quote (Richardthughes @ Sep. 13 2012,14:33) Bwahahahah - Joe G not even on the radar! He's still trying to qualify: Quote Why is it that artificial ribosomes do NOT function? If their functionality was the result of their physical and chemical components then artificial ribosomes should function just as the ribosomes found inside living organisms. Artificial ribosomes are lacking the programming required by compilers to function. -------------- And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number. -- Joe G Please stop putting words into my mouth that don't belong there and thoughts into my mind that don't belong there. -- KF

Soapy Sam Posts: 659 Joined: Jan. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 14 2012,06:44    Quote (keiths @ Sep. 13 2012,21:05)   Quote (Richardthughes @ Sep. 13 2012,14:33) Bwahahahah - Joe G not even on the radar! He's still trying to qualify:     Quote Why is it that artificial ribosomes do NOT function? If their functionality was the result of their physical and chemical components then artificial ribosomes should function just as the ribosomes found inside living organisms. Artificial ribosomes are lacking the programming required by compilers to function. This is one of his current favorites. I thought functional artificial ribosomes had been synthesised, but it doesn't matter either way. It hardly points to a missing magic ingredient - and certainly not capital-D-Design as that ingredient - if you can't. You just haven't got one of the functional points in sequence space yet. -------------- SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G BTW, when you make little jabs like “I thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,” you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 14 2012,07:12    Well obviously AF Dave is the Tard de la Tard who epitomises the raison d'ętre d'tard. Missing in action for some time but not forgotten for an heroic, if not uplifting performance. His one on one, carefully calibrated blind onanisme was something to behold He in'souciantly broke every ethical pillar available to ID. Even Dembski retains more credibility than AF Dave but separated only by one place by the Meglomaniac from Monserrat GOOOOOOORDON MULLINNGSSSSSSSSSSS! <insert canned clapping> That still makes Dembski the most disappointing tard this season. Could we expect more? Is it the coaches, the draft or the development squad? Where are the angels? Where the fuck is that useless cunt GOD? I'm guessing after much navel gazing the next season will see the usual round; Of the blind leading the blind, the money changers doing well and the sick, poor and destitute no better off. Let's hear a big cheer for ID, bringing values free Xtianity to a store near you! -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

OgreMkV Posts: 3668 Joined: Oct. 2009 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 14 2012,07:31    Quote (Soapy Sam @ Sep. 14 2012,06:44) Quote (keiths @ Sep. 13 2012,21:05)     Quote (Richardthughes @ Sep. 13 2012,14:33) Bwahahahah - Joe G not even on the radar! He's still trying to qualify:     Quote Why is it that artificial ribosomes do NOT function? If their functionality was the result of their physical and chemical components then artificial ribosomes should function just as the ribosomes found inside living organisms. Artificial ribosomes are lacking the programming required by compilers to function. This is one of his current favorites. I thought functional artificial ribosomes had been synthesised, but it doesn't matter either way. It hardly points to a missing magic ingredient - and certainly not capital-D-Design as that ingredient - if you can't. You just haven't got one of the functional points in sequence space yet. Depends on what you mean by artificial.  [Curious how it always comes back to semantics with Jo-Jo.] Anyway, if one means artificial as 'never before appearing on the Earth', then yes, it has been done.  I'll have to look up the reference. If one means that a human assembled an RNA from scratch, by placing the nucleotides in order one at a time, then no it hasn't been done.  Why would that even be a requirement?  Has Jo-Jo ever built a car from parts?  And I mean parts here, no already assembled components like water pumps and alternators.   So, if Jo-Jo can't build a functioning car from parts, then the claim is that unless cars are built in a factory, they don't work? dumb -------------- Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims. http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

midwifetoad Posts: 4003 Joined: Mar. 2008 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 14 2012,07:50    Somewhere there's a description of the steps required to make a pencil. No one can make a pencil, nor does anyone know how. http://www.econlib.org/library....l1.html I notice the pencil essay has some political baggage, but history ties the idea of evolution to Adam Smith and his invisible hand. For whatever reason, Darwinian thinking produces strange kinds of compartmentalization. Edited by midwifetoad on Sep. 14 2012,08:30 -------------- Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

Robin Posts: 1431 Joined: Sep. 2009 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 14 2012,08:18    Yeah, I'm with Soapy Sam above - Gordon #1 and Joe #2 (ha ha ha...funny when put that way). I just couldn't in good conscious hit the button for Joe though. Gordo is Tarderific; Joe is just pathetically insane. Oh...and my honorable mention went to Vox Day. War Mouse alone deserves a nod. Thanks for the great poll Ras! ETA: Rearranged my thinking along with my sentences. Edited by Robin on Sep. 14 2012,08:22 -------------- we IDists rule in design for the flagellum and cilium largely because they do look designed.  Bilbo The only reason you reject Thor is because, like a cushion, you bear the imprint of the biggest arse that sat on you. Louis

Erasmus, FCD Posts: 6349 Joined: June 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 14 2012,08:55    it's fun to gossip about these assholes since they won't talk about, you know, science -------------- You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

Erasmus, FCD Posts: 6349 Joined: June 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 14 2012,09:05    OK NEW TOPIC --------------------------------------------------- which tard, IN YOUR OPINION, is the most likely to have a glenn morton moment?   which one, of the same pool of tards we just considered, would you be least surprised to see stand up and say [paraphrase] "I was wrong, creationism is retarded and I don't believe it anymore". ---------------------------------------------------- Please PM me your answer I have to dump all my inbox first though LOL I will tally the votes some time depending on the rate at which they accumulate I think it would be most awesomest if we did not advocate for particular tards here in this open thread.  Just to keep it free of that loathsome taint. -------------- You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

Erasmus, FCD Posts: 6349 Joined: June 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 14 2012,09:06    this is metatardwarrioring 21st century up in this bitch -------------- You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

midwifetoad Posts: 4003 Joined: Mar. 2008 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 14 2012,09:48    I'm AFraid I missed AFdave. I recall some discussions, but never had the stomach to read them. They were scrollbyes like BA77 and Joe. You really only have to read one KF post. Dembski is amusing not for anything he says but for the contrast between credentials and performance. That's really what holds my attention. -------------- Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

Erasmus, FCD Posts: 6349 Joined: June 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 14 2012,10:16    Quote (midwifetoad @ Sep. 14 2012,10:48) They were scrollbyes like BA77 and Joe. no way dude.  they are pure golden tardy goodness don't take my word for it compare to the shitty tard we get from UD now.  it's watered down, stomped on, compressed, moldy, full of seeds and smells like formaldehyde.   AFDave was like that tard that grew in the sunshine and got fully watered all the time and shit.  virgin.  mmmmmmmmm and, I miss the the shit out stevestory -------------- You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

Amadan Posts: 1337 Joined: Jan. 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 14 2012,11:09    Another thing that clinched it for me was AFDave's "degree in electrical engineering from U Texas Arlington". * snorf! * -------------- "People are always looking for natural selection to generate random mutations" - Densye  4-4-2011 JoeG BTW dumbass- some variations help ensure reproductive fitness so they cannot be random wrt it.

damitall Posts: 331 Joined: Jan. 2009 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 14 2012,11:29    AFDave (as Dave Hawkins) has recently been infesting TalkRational. His latest thing is that he can feed 9 billion people with mob-stocking grass-fed beef, (never mind those that won't eat beef for religious/cultural reasons) grass-fed milk, and honey (which cures everything, apparently) In spite of sterling efforts by TalkRats, he denies utterly that ~ 75% of the world population is lactose intolerant - 'cos that's genetic, that is, and genetics is not Godly. He now regards himself as an agricultural expert (he has 4 horses. a cow and a calf - a pretty cheap and measly effort for one who describes himself as a millionaire) ) and is doing the rounds of the Prophets of Sustainable Farming  - All you Need is Woodchips and Bullshit. He took umbrage at Talkrats asking for facts and figures about his plan to feed the world (and asking why grass-fed milk wouldn't affect lactose intolerant people), and flounced off - I think to infest some forum where organic gardeners go

sparc Posts: 2088 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 14 2012,11:30    Quote (OgreMkV @ Sep. 14 2012,07:31) Quote (Soapy Sam @ Sep. 14 2012,06:44)   Quote (keiths @ Sep. 13 2012,21:05)       Quote (Richardthughes @ Sep. 13 2012,14:33) Bwahahahah - Joe G not even on the radar! He's still trying to qualify:       Quote Why is it that artificial ribosomes do NOT function? If their functionality was the result of their physical and chemical components then artificial ribosomes should function just as the ribosomes found inside living organisms. Artificial ribosomes are lacking the programming required by compilers to function. This is one of his current favorites. I thought functional artificial ribosomes had been synthesised, but it doesn't matter either way. It hardly points to a missing magic ingredient - and certainly not capital-D-Design as that ingredient - if you can't. You just haven't got one of the functional points in sequence space yet. Depends on what you mean by artificial.  [Curious how it always comes back to semantics with Jo-Jo.] Anyway, if one means artificial as 'never before appearing on the Earth', then yes, it has been done.  I'll have to look up the reference. If one means that a human assembled an RNA from scratch, by placing the nucleotides in order one at a time, then no it hasn't been done.  Why would that even be a requirement?  Has Jo-Jo ever built a car from parts?  And I mean parts here, no already assembled components like water pumps and alternators.   So, if Jo-Jo can't build a functioning car from parts, then the claim is that unless cars are built in a factory, they don't work? dumb LMGTFY -------------- "[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God." - William Dembski -

midwifetoad Posts: 4003 Joined: Mar. 2008 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 14 2012,14:16    Let's be careful here. I buy grass fed milk because I think it tastes better. Could be my imagination, but it's cheaper than most delusions. -------------- Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

midwifetoad Posts: 4003 Joined: Mar. 2008 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 14 2012,14:22    Quote no way dude.  they are pure golden tardy goodness don't take my word for it Ouch, ouch, ow, oh! Damn, you guys must have neurons of steel. Three paragraphs and It's like inhaling insanity sauce. But at least I know what BA 77 would be like without the videos. -------------- Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

Patrick Posts: 666 Joined: July 2011 (Permalink) Posted: Sep. 14 2012,15:06    Quote (midwifetoad @ Sep. 14 2012,10:48) You really only have to read one KF post. You read a whole one?  Footnotes, postscripts, and everything? Pull the other one.  The next thing you'll be telling me is that you watched all of the videos in a typical bornagain77 post.

Pages: (356) < ... 212 213 214 215 216 [217] 218 219 220 221 222 ... >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard