RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < ... 116 117 118 119 120 [121] 122 123 124 125 126 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Woodbine



Posts: 1218
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 11 2012,20:06   



One day, Sal.

One day.....

:D

(no links)

  
Dr.GH



Posts: 2333
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 11 2012,22:13   

Quote (Woodbine @ Mar. 11 2012,18:06)


One day, Sal.

One day.....

:D

(no links)

Slimy Sal only sings one song, and he can't remember the words, or the tune.

--------------
"Science is the horse that pulls the cart of philosophy."

L. Susskind, 2004 "SMOLIN VS. SUSSKIND: THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE"

   
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 12 2012,01:40   

what a pussy slimy sal only crawls out from under his rock after the party left

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 12 2012,02:50   

anybody think sal has got laid by man woman or beast since he last posted on UD?  yeah me neither

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Bob O'H



Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 12 2012,03:50   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ Mar. 12 2012,02:50)
anybody think sal has got laid by man woman or beast since he last posted on UD?  yeah me neither

Dunno about his sex life, but he has been part of Gamblers for Christ.

(don't worry - that's not a link to UD)

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 12 2012,07:33   

Quote (Bob O'H @ Mar. 12 2012,04:50)
Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Mar. 12 2012,02:50)
anybody think sal has got laid by man woman or beast since he last posted on UD?  yeah me neither

Dunno about his sex life, but he has been part of Gamblers for Christ.

(don't worry - that's not a link to UD)



--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 12 2012,08:20   

Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Mar. 12 2012,15:33)
 
Quote (Bob O'H @ Mar. 12 2012,04:50)
   
Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Mar. 12 2012,02:50)
anybody think sal has got laid by man woman or beast since he last posted on UD?  yeah me neither

Dunno about his sex life, but he has been part of Gamblers for Christ.

(don't worry - that's not a link to UD)




Wot?

Sal got busted for selling Aspirin as LSD at Disney World?

MON RESPECT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 12 2012,09:39   

Quote (Bob O'H @ Mar. 12 2012,03:50)
Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Mar. 12 2012,02:50)
anybody think sal has got laid by man woman or beast since he last posted on UD?  yeah me neither

Dunno about his sex life, but he has been part of Gamblers for Christ.

(don't worry - that's not a link to UD)

That Guardian thread brings up the invention of the gene gun. It would appear that Sanford expressed a desire for the function, but that Edward Wolf and John Allen actually did the engineering.

Sanford's contribution appears to have been asking the right question at the right time to the right person. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 12 2012,09:48   

salvatard

Quote
Hi Bob,

First off, I had nothing to do with any moderation actions against you at UD. I would have voted for you to remain at UD. I myself as you know was booted by Dave Scot and I only returned after he was booted. I mention it only to say, though we've disagreed intensely, I've always valued your participation. I hope we can remain on good terms.

I received an informal participation to attend the Cornell conference, but chose not to attend, as I'm focusing on things other than ID. I actually thought it was going to be some creationist conference ( you know about baraminology or young earth as Sanford is an Young Earth Creationist). I thought the major topic was going to be on genetic entropy and the conference would only have a few grad students having soft drinks and hanging out. I had no idea the big names were going to be in attendance, certainly not 120 people!

Sanford's work on the topics have been previously published in Springer-Verlag in computational modeling of populations.

I didn't know about all this myself until I got an e-mail that grrlscientist made a big issue over this. I can't give any insight.

I expect attempts at publication will continue. Behe's actually published something obviously on the lines of genetic entropy in a peer-reviewed paper already:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-jornal

If the powers that be will allow publications like this, then maybe future publications will be permitted provided no mention of ID is made. It's becoming fashionable these days even for atheist to criticize Darwin (witness Fodor and Piantelli). I suppose Behe's reviewer begrudgingly had to publish Behe's paper in as much as that if Sanford is right that human genomes are getting sicker, the issue can't be ignored as it has medical significance. Heck, even Michael Lynch in his first articles with the Nationa Academy of Sciences is expressing the same concerns. We can't ignore the problem of genetic deterioration, even though it might give ammo to the creationists.

Peer-reviewers can ignore the genetic entropy issue on account it may support the creationist case, but they would do so at the ethical price of knowing they are withholding the truth about the worsening condition of human genes. Sanford, being a genetic engineer, is well aware of this. Michael Lynch is too, and those studying bio-informatics who track the increase of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms will know this is painfully true as well.

There is a flip side to this. The creationist may not want the genetic entropy story out either as it gives ammo to the eugenecists!

There is nothing secret about what we've been researching. It might be that from now on we can only publish ID related things by:

1. not mentioning ID
2. not saying bad things about Darwin
3. not saying evolution is wrong

But we can state the facts, like -- the human genome is deteriorating. If we don't get to say it, you know someone else will. A story that big can't be suppressed for ever. Even Konrashov asked the same question: why aren't we dead 100 times over.




does that subliterate shit salad make sense to anyone?

"we can state the facts, like"  followed by not-facts

pssst, hey sal, capitalizing "Single Nucleotide Polymorphism" doesn't make it more impressive.  well, maybe to you

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 12 2012,10:02   

The surest sign of a deteriorating genome is exponential population growth.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 12 2012,10:06   

i like how he keep saying "we" he must be cupping someone's balls while he uses that word

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Quack



Posts: 1961
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 12 2012,16:04   

Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Mar. 12 2012,09:48)
salvatard

 
Quote
Hi Bob,

First off, I had nothing to do with any moderation actions against you at UD. I would have voted for you to remain at UD. I myself as you know was booted by Dave Scot and I only returned after he was booted. I mention it only to say, though we've disagreed intensely, I've always valued your participation. I hope we can remain on good terms.

I received an informal participation to attend the Cornell conference, but chose not to attend, as I'm focusing on things other than ID. I actually thought it was going to be some creationist conference ( you know about baraminology or young earth as Sanford is an Young Earth Creationist). I thought the major topic was going to be on genetic entropy and the conference would only have a few grad students having soft drinks and hanging out. I had no idea the big names were going to be in attendance, certainly not 120 people!

Sanford's work on the topics have been previously published in Springer-Verlag in computational modeling of populations.

I didn't know about all this myself until I got an e-mail that grrlscientist made a big issue over this. I can't give any insight.

I expect attempts at publication will continue. Behe's actually published something obviously on the lines of genetic entropy in a peer-reviewed paper already:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-jornal

If the powers that be will allow publications like this, then maybe future publications will be permitted provided no mention of ID is made. It's becoming fashionable these days even for atheist to criticize Darwin (witness Fodor and Piantelli). I suppose Behe's reviewer begrudgingly had to publish Behe's paper in as much as that if Sanford is right that human genomes are getting sicker, the issue can't be ignored as it has medical significance. Heck, even Michael Lynch in his first articles with the Nationa Academy of Sciences is expressing the same concerns. We can't ignore the problem of genetic deterioration, even though it might give ammo to the creationists.

Peer-reviewers can ignore the genetic entropy issue on account it may support the creationist case, but they would do so at the ethical price of knowing they are withholding the truth about the worsening condition of human genes. Sanford, being a genetic engineer, is well aware of this. Michael Lynch is too, and those studying bio-informatics who track the increase of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms will know this is painfully true as well.

There is a flip side to this. The creationist may not want the genetic entropy story out either as it gives ammo to the eugenecists!

There is nothing secret about what we've been researching. It might be that from now on we can only publish ID related things by:

1. not mentioning ID
2. not saying bad things about Darwin
3. not saying evolution is wrong

But we can state the facts, like -- the human genome is deteriorating. If we don't get to say it, you know someone else will. A story that big can't be suppressed for ever. Even Konrashov asked the same question: why aren't we dead 100 times over.




does that subliterate shit salad make sense to anyone?

"we can state the facts, like"  followed by not-facts

pssst, hey sal, capitalizing "Single Nucleotide Polymorphism" doesn't make it more impressive.  well, maybe to you

If I hadn't read it I wouldn't have belived anyone could write like that. Salvatard is the supertard.

--------------
Rocks have no biology.
              Robert Byers.

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,03:50   

Quote (Quack @ Mar. 13 2012,00:04)
Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Mar. 12 2012,09:48)
salvatard

   
Quote
Hi Bob,

First off, I had nothing to do with any moderation actions against you at UD. I would have voted for you to remain at UD. I myself as you know was booted by Dave Scot and I only returned after he was booted. I mention it only to say, though we've disagreed intensely, I've always valued your participation. I hope we can remain on good terms.

I received an informal participation to attend the Cornell conference, but chose not to attend, as I'm focusing on things other than ID. I actually thought it was going to be some creationist conference ( you know about baraminology or young earth as Sanford is an Young Earth Creationist). I thought the major topic was going to be on genetic entropy and the conference would only have a few grad students having soft drinks and hanging out. I had no idea the big names were going to be in attendance, certainly not 120 people!

Sanford's work on the topics have been previously published in Springer-Verlag in computational modeling of populations.

I didn't know about all this myself until I got an e-mail that grrlscientist made a big issue over this. I can't give any insight.

I expect attempts at publication will continue. Behe's actually published something obviously on the lines of genetic entropy in a peer-reviewed paper already:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-jornal

If the powers that be will allow publications like this, then maybe future publications will be permitted provided no mention of ID is made. It's becoming fashionable these days even for atheist to criticize Darwin (witness Fodor and Piantelli). I suppose Behe's reviewer begrudgingly had to publish Behe's paper in as much as that if Sanford is right that human genomes are getting sicker, the issue can't be ignored as it has medical significance. Heck, even Michael Lynch in his first articles with the Nationa Academy of Sciences is expressing the same concerns. We can't ignore the problem of genetic deterioration, even though it might give ammo to the creationists.

Peer-reviewers can ignore the genetic entropy issue on account it may support the creationist case, but they would do so at the ethical price of knowing they are withholding the truth about the worsening condition of human genes. Sanford, being a genetic engineer, is well aware of this. Michael Lynch is too, and those studying bio-informatics who track the increase of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms will know this is painfully true as well.

There is a flip side to this. The creationist may not want the genetic entropy story out either as it gives ammo to the eugenecists!

There is nothing secret about what we've been researching. It might be that from now on we can only publish ID related things by:

1. not mentioning ID
2. not saying bad things about Darwin
3. not saying evolution is wrong

But we can state the facts, like -- the human genome is deteriorating. If we don't get to say it, you know someone else will. A story that big can't be suppressed for ever. Even Konrashov asked the same question: why aren't we dead 100 times over.




does that subliterate shit salad make sense to anyone?

"we can state the facts, like"  followed by not-facts

pssst, hey sal, capitalizing "Single Nucleotide Polymorphism" doesn't make it more impressive.  well, maybe to you

If I hadn't read it I wouldn't have belived anyone could write like that. Salvatard is the supertard.

Well he's fucked now the eugenecists are gona want a piece of his ass.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
damitall



Posts: 331
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,06:18   

Paranoia

Mullings:
 
Quote
I notice we are running at a better than 100:1 views to comments ratio, about ten times the usual ratio for UD, which strongly suggests that this thread is under hostile observation.


Couldn't be any other reason, could there?

  
Woodbine



Posts: 1218
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,06:25   

Quote
Mullings: I notice we are running at a better than 100:1 views to comments ratio, about ten times the usual ratio for UD, which strongly suggests that this thread is under hostile observation.

Reminds me of....


  
Woodbine



Posts: 1218
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,06:29   

Mullins is a fucking lunatic.
 
Quote
Now, I had long thought that the Creationism in a cheap tuxedo sneer was a toxic smear, but it was only when I made the connexions through the Barna survey and the Aiden vampire clergy video, in light of the cyber harassing comment by subject Y of the initial circle of attackers since June/July last year, that I saw that we are actually dealing with blood libel.

:D
 
Quote
Enough is enough, Mr Dawkins and ilk.

:D

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,06:42   

Quote (Woodbine @ Mar. 13 2012,14:29)
Mullins is a fucking lunatic.
   
Quote
Now, I had long thought that the Creationism in a cheap tuxedo sneer was a toxic smear, but it was only when I made the connexions through the Barna survey and the Aiden vampire clergy video, in light of the cyber harassing comment by subject Y of the initial circle of attackers since June/July last year, that I saw that we are actually dealing with blood libel.

:D
   
Quote
Enough is enough, Mr Dawkins and ilk.

:D

Jeez ......No Shit Sherlock is onto us



--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
carlsonjok



Posts: 3326
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,07:00   

Quote (damitall @ Mar. 13 2012,06:18)
Paranoia

Mullings:
   
Quote
I notice we are running at a better than 100:1 views to comments ratio, about ten times the usual ratio for UD, which strongly suggests that this thread is under hostile observation.


Couldn't be any other reason, could there?

Calling all socks! Calling all socks!



Oh, well. That could be a problem.

--------------
It's natural to be curious about our world, but the scientific method is just one theory about how to best understand it.  We live in a democracy, which means we should treat every theory equally. - Steven Colbert, I Am America (and So Can You!)

  
carlsonjok



Posts: 3326
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,07:18   

Quote (Woodbine @ Mar. 13 2012,06:29)
Mullins is a fucking lunatic.
   
Quote
Now, I had long thought that the Creationism in a cheap tuxedo sneer was a toxic smear, but it was only when I made the connexions through the Barna survey and the Aiden vampire clergy video, in light of the cyber harassing comment by subject Y of the initial circle of attackers since June/July last year, that I saw that we are actually dealing with blood libel.

:D

Umm, let me get this straight.  Mullings is likening the description of ID as a low-rent creationism to the accusation that Jews kill Christian babies to use their blood in religious rituals?  Is that what he is doing?  



--------------
It's natural to be curious about our world, but the scientific method is just one theory about how to best understand it.  We live in a democracy, which means we should treat every theory equally. - Steven Colbert, I Am America (and So Can You!)

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,07:28   

i am sure that most of those 100 views are coming from FUCKING DRUNKS

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1267
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,07:37   

Quote (damitall @ Mar. 13 2012,06:18)
Paranoia

Mullings:
   
Quote
I notice we are running at a better than 100:1 views to comments ratio, about ten times the usual ratio for UD, which strongly suggests that this thread is under hostile observation.


Couldn't be any other reason, could there?

Thanking god for small mercies, is it, kf? Why not count comments per thread?

--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,08:07   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ Mar. 13 2012,15:28)
i am sure that most of those 100 views are coming from FUCKING DRUNKS

probably just one drunk fuck...looks around

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,08:41   

Quote (carlsonjok @ Mar. 13 2012,05:18)
Quote (Woodbine @ Mar. 13 2012,06:29)
Mullins is a fucking lunatic.
     
Quote
Now, I had long thought that the Creationism in a cheap tuxedo sneer was a toxic smear, but it was only when I made the connexions through the Barna survey and the Aiden vampire clergy video, in light of the cyber harassing comment by subject Y of the initial circle of attackers since June/July last year, that I saw that we are actually dealing with blood libel.

:D

Umm, let me get this straight.  Mullings is likening the description of ID as a low-rent creationism to the accusation that Jews kill Christian babies to use their blood in religious rituals?  Is that what he is doing?  


That explains it: RF burns to the head.

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
Freddie



Posts: 371
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,10:38   

Quote (carlsonjok @ Mar. 13 2012,07:18)
       
Quote (Woodbine @ Mar. 13 2012,06:29)
Mullins is a fucking lunatic.
             
Quote
Now, I had long thought that the Creationism in a cheap tuxedo sneer was a toxic smear, but it was only when I made the connexions through the Barna survey and the Aiden vampire clergy video, in light of the cyber harassing comment by subject Y of the initial circle of attackers since June/July last year, that I saw that we are actually dealing with blood libel.

:D

Umm, let me get this straight.  Mullings is likening the description of ID as a low-rent creationism to the accusation that Jews kill Christian babies to use their blood in religious rituals?  Is that what he is doing?  


Okay - I know I swore off that place but this is too good to pass up.  

KF:
       
Quote
In hot retort, one of the associates of one site (who seems to moderate another of the hate sites and who runs a site of his own with “NSFW,” highly questionable photos [Ed: wonder who that could be? hehe] ) stated, in relevant part:

If more people spent their Sundays at home watching porn, there’d be less money in the coffers of those houses of hate and ignorance called churches. That could only be good for the world . . . . You are the most sanctimonious, lying, misogynistic, homophobic, willfully ignorant, unintentionally hilarious scum of the earth windbag on the interwebs.

That highly unusual word, “coffers,” points straight back to the lyrics of Hysteria,  AIDEN’s so-called “atheists anthem.”

Remember, in the video, the below — which I annotate — is being sung by a vampire clergyman, standing in a graveyard (I understand of US service-members):

Love how they burn your synagogues
Love how they torch your holy books
Filling coffers [--> offerings are blood-money] with your grief
Filling coffins with your misery [--> you are war mongers]
...

Emphasis from original.

(1) 'coffers' is not a highly unusual word - I used it in a non-churchy context just the other day!

(2) I have no idea what he is claiming here other than that perhaps the word is some sort of secret signal used by the atheist cabal to stir things up ... or something.  Because it appeared not once but twice somewhere ... and only a few months apart!  Weird.

Best part is then in the comments from Byers:

     
Quote
It is a fair suspicion that those who accuse the most and the most severely are themselves involved in what they accuse.

Modern life surely has ended the old prohibition against conspiracy theories.
They can be true and many have simply different lists.


Priceless.

--------------
Joe: Most criticisims of ID stem from ignorance and jealousy.
Joe: As for the authors of the books in the Bible, well the OT was authored by Moses and the NT was authored by various people.
Byers: The eskimo would not need hairy hair growth as hair, I say, is for keeping people dry. Not warm.

  
Woodbine



Posts: 1218
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,10:57   

You just know that lunatic is playing that song backwards, listening out for the devilspeak.

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,11:00   

*snicker*

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,11:01   

...and P.S. My photos are not questionable.

They are goddamned good, fucktard.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
noncarborundum



Posts: 320
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,11:11   

Quote (Freddie @ Mar. 13 2012,10:38)
Quote (carlsonjok @ Mar. 13 2012,07:18)
         
Quote (Woodbine @ Mar. 13 2012,06:29)
Mullins is a fucking lunatic.
               
Quote
Now, I had long thought that the Creationism in a cheap tuxedo sneer was a toxic smear, but it was only when I made the connexions through the Barna survey and the Aiden vampire clergy video, in light of the cyber harassing comment by subject Y of the initial circle of attackers since June/July last year, that I saw that we are actually dealing with blood libel.

:D

Umm, let me get this straight.  Mullings is likening the description of ID as a low-rent creationism to the accusation that Jews kill Christian babies to use their blood in religious rituals?  Is that what he is doing?  


Okay - I know I swore off that place but this is too good to pass up.  

KF:
         
Quote
In hot retort, one of the associates of one site (who seems to moderate another of the hate sites and who runs a site of his own with “NSFW,” highly questionable photos [Ed: wonder who that could be? hehe] ) stated, in relevant part:

If more people spent their Sundays at home watching porn, there’d be less money in the coffers of those houses of hate and ignorance called churches. That could only be good for the world . . . . You are the most sanctimonious, lying, misogynistic, homophobic, willfully ignorant, unintentionally hilarious scum of the earth windbag on the interwebs.

That highly unusual word, “coffers,” points straight back to the lyrics of Hysteria,  AIDEN’s so-called “atheists anthem.”

Remember, in the video, the below — which I annotate — is being sung by a vampire clergyman, standing in a graveyard (I understand of US service-members):

Love how they burn your synagogues
Love how they torch your holy books
Filling coffers [--> offerings are blood-money] with your grief
Filling coffins with your misery [--> you are war mongers]
...

Emphasis from original.

(1) 'coffers' is not a highly unusual word - I used it in a non-churchy context just the other day!

(2) I have no idea what he is claiming here other than that perhaps the word is some sort of secret signal used by the atheist cabal to stir things up ... or something.  Because it appeared not once but twice somewhere ... and only a few months apart!  Weird.

Best part is then in the comments from Byers:

       
Quote
It is a fair suspicion that those who accuse the most and the most severely are themselves involved in what they accuse.

Modern life surely has ended the old prohibition against conspiracy theories.
They can be true and many have simply different lists.


Priceless.

I remember my 7th-grade World History teacher quoting an old line from the time of the Protestant Reformation:  "As soon as the coin in the coffer rings, the soul from purgatory springs."  Who knew Johann Tetzel was quoting Aiden?

In 1518.

--------------
"The . . . um . . . okay, I was genetically selected for blue eyes.  I know there are brown eyes, because I've observed them, but I can't do it.  Okay?  So . . . um . . . coz that's real genetic selection, not the nonsense Giberson and the others are talking about." - DO'L

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,11:25   

if you quit paying attention to the cunt he'll go back to jacking off over lewontin every day and chasing demons

not saying they'll be released but if gordon knew about the pictures we have with the child he'd probably not be bitching about other people and porn

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 13 2012,11:26   

P.P.S. I'm pretty sure Gordon E. Mullings, AKA Kairosfocus, AKA misogynistic douchenozzle of Montserrat, AKA biggest, most self-loathing closeted homosexual of the Caribbean (come on out, Gordy, nobody cares except you and it's not like there is anyone anywhere who doesn't already know), is just pissed off that I don't have enough penis on my website to give his left hand a little strange, down there in his sister's basement.

Just for you, Gordy, I'll try and get some male nudes up this week while I'm on Spring Break, just for your wanking pleasure. I'm a good guy like that.

Fair warning though, I don't really "get" the male form like I do the female form, so they may not be as good.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < ... 116 117 118 119 120 [121] 122 123 124 125 126 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]