RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (300) < ... 292 293 294 295 296 [297] 298 299 300 >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 5, Return To Teh Dingbat Buffet< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1098
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 15 2017,13:20   

Dense and Dreary, posted a KLM ad about Pride.

Leave it to Dense and Barry to use the seat belt analogy to conclude that homosexuality is hazardous.
Gay seatbelts are a sin and an abomination

  
fnxtr



Posts: 2576
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 15 2017,13:32   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Sep. 15 2017,11:20)
Dense and Dreary, posted a KLM ad about Pride.

Leave it to Dense and Barry to use the seat belt analogy to conclude that homosexuality is hazardous.
Gay seatbelts are a sin and an abomination

... and cue Potassium Fluoride's spittle-flecked screed in 3.. 2...

edit. though Flouride might be a cool new element extracted from triticale...

--------------
"But it's disturbing to think someone actually thinks creationism -- having put it's hand on the hot stove every day for the last 400 years -- will get a different result tomorrow." -- midwifetoad

"I am in a rush to catch up with science work." -- Gary Gaulin

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1098
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 15 2017,14:19   

Quote (fnxtr @ Sep. 15 2017,13:32)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Sep. 15 2017,11:20)
Dense and Dreary, posted a KLM ad about Pride.

Leave it to Dense and Barry to use the seat belt analogy to conclude that homosexuality is hazardous.
Gay seatbelts are a sin and an abomination

... and cue Potassium Flouride's spittle-flecked screed in 3.. 2...

Nothing but science from UD.
Quote
john_a_designer September 15, 2017 at 12:43 pm
The ad (unintentionally, no doubt) illustrates the absurdity of “same sex marriage”:

[b]Two women can’t make a baby.

Two men can’t make a baby.

Only a man and a woman can.[/]

But as we all know, it’s “politically incorrect” to point out the obvious.

Bolding in original.

  
Henry J



Posts: 4755
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 15 2017,17:54   

Maybe somebody just needed a belt?

  
Woodbine



Posts: 1198
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 15 2017,20:13   

Much better when we could stone them to death with a blunt object.

Edited by Woodbine on Sep. 16 2017,02:18

  
Woodbine



Posts: 1198
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 15 2017,20:18   

Just realised I've been coming here for 10 years (nearer 12 if you ignore reg date). Can safely say it's been one of the few constants in my life during that time - so thanks to everyone at AtBC, I've laughed and learned loads.

Anyway, onward with the shitposting!

Edited by Woodbine on Sep. 16 2017,02:19

  
Woodbine



Posts: 1198
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 15 2017,20:20   

I hate those 'edited by....' tags. So messy.

  
fnxtr



Posts: 2576
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 15 2017,20:27   

Quote (Woodbine @ Sep. 15 2017,18:18)
Just realised I've been coming here for 10 years (nearer 12 if you ignore reg date). Can safely say it's been one of the few constants in my life during that time - so thanks to everyone at AtBC, I've laughed and learned loads.

Anyway, onward with the shitposting!

Back at you.

--------------
"But it's disturbing to think someone actually thinks creationism -- having put it's hand on the hot stove every day for the last 400 years -- will get a different result tomorrow." -- midwifetoad

"I am in a rush to catch up with science work." -- Gary Gaulin

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 2062
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 16 2017,14:59   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Sep. 15 2017,14:19)
     
Quote
john_a_designer September 15, 2017 at 12:43 pm
The ad (unintentionally, no doubt) illustrates the absurdity of “same sex marriage”:

Two women can’t make a baby.

Two men can’t make a baby.&

Only a man and a woman can.


But as we all know, it’s “politically incorrect” to point out the obvious.

Bolding in original.

So what are we going to do with those priests and nuns then?

One woman can't make a baby.

One man can't make a baby.

Only a man and a woman can.


But as we all know, its "conservatively incorrect" to point out the obvious.

--------------
...after reviewing the arguments, I’m inclined to believe that the critics of ENCODE’s bold claim were mostly right, and that the proportion of our genome which is functional is probably between 10 and 20%.  --Vincent Torley, uncommondescent.com 1/1/2016

  
stevestory



Posts: 10374
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 16 2017,15:09   

Quote (CeilingCat @ Sep. 16 2017,15:59)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Sep. 15 2017,14:19)
     
Quote
john_a_designer September 15, 2017 at 12:43 pm
The ad (unintentionally, no doubt) illustrates the absurdity of “same sex marriage”:

Two women can’t make a baby.

Two men can’t make a baby.&

Only a man and a woman can.


But as we all know, it’s “politically incorrect” to point out the obvious.

Bolding in original.

So what are we going to do with those priests and nuns then?

One woman can't make a baby.

One man can't make a baby.

Only a man and a woman can.


But as we all know, its "conservatively incorrect" to point out the obvious.

so let's ban infertile couples from marriage!

   
CeilingCat



Posts: 2062
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 16 2017,19:08   

And ban men without balls or a cock from even going to church!

If a man’s testicles are crushed or his penis is cut off, he may not be admitted to the assembly of the Lord.

Deuteronomy 23:1 New Living Translation

Natural law, man!

--------------
...after reviewing the arguments, I’m inclined to believe that the critics of ENCODE’s bold claim were mostly right, and that the proportion of our genome which is functional is probably between 10 and 20%.  --Vincent Torley, uncommondescent.com 1/1/2016

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 1035
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2017,04:40   

That KLM thread has earned its keep, as far as I'm concerned. It has Barry, still refusing treatment for his assholism, declaring that he is more 'up' with the definition of 'Darwinism' than visiting sane people(comment 20). We also get the usual UD homophobic dimwittery from the likes of john_a_designer, above, and tribune7, whose gotcha question for those in favour of SSM is "Should a father be allowed to marry his son?" (it doesn't appear to have occurred to him to consider the same question in a heterosexual context).

To top it off, though, KF is declaring that he has never had a blowjob, and never will; oral sex is one of the factors leading civilisation over the cliff! (comment 70 in the UD thread).

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
JohnW



Posts: 2829
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2017,12:06   

Quote (Ptaylor @ Sep. 18 2017,02:40)
To top it off, though, KF is declaring that he has never had a blowjob, and never will; oral sex is one of the factors leading civilisation over the cliff! (comment 70 in the UD thread).

Of course it is.  That's why they call it "going down".

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1098
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2017,14:34   

Quote (JohnW @ Sep. 18 2017,12:06)
Quote (Ptaylor @ Sep. 18 2017,02:40)
To top it off, though, KF is declaring that he has never had a blowjob, and never will; oral sex is one of the factors leading civilisation over the cliff! (comment 70 in the UD thread).

Of course it is.  That's why they call it "going down".

And, of course, he has never masturbated.

  
Texas Teach



Posts: 1493
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2017,17:20   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Sep. 18 2017,14:34)
Quote (JohnW @ Sep. 18 2017,12:06)
Quote (Ptaylor @ Sep. 18 2017,02:40)
To top it off, though, KF is declaring that he has never had a blowjob, and never will; oral sex is one of the factors leading civilisation over the cliff! (comment 70 in the UD thread).

Of course it is.  That's why they call it "going down".

And, of course, he has never masturbated.

And if anyone believes that, I've got a small island to sell you.

Speaking of that small island, I find it noteworthy that KF uses the time before a big ass hurricane hits him to worry about how others get off.  Good allocation of time there.

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
Bob O'H



Posts: 2190
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 19 2017,02:05   

Quote (Texas Teach @ Sep. 18 2017,17:20)
Speaking of that small island, I find it noteworthy that KF uses the time before a big ass hurricane hits him to worry about how others get off.  Good allocation of time there.

That's kind of him, don't you think, to be concerned about the evacuation of the island?

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
KevinB



Posts: 348
Joined: April 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 19 2017,07:01   

Quote (Bob O'H @ Sep. 19 2017,02:05)
 
Quote (Texas Teach @ Sep. 18 2017,17:20)
Speaking of that small island, I find it noteworthy that KF uses the time before a big ass hurricane hits him to worry about how others get off.  Good allocation of time there.

That's kind of him, don't you think, to be concerned about the evacuation of the island?

I think you may have misunderstood the nature of the evacuation.

  
Henry J



Posts: 4755
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 19 2017,09:39   

Or he "misunderstood" what "get off" meant in that context. :p

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 1098
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 19 2017,10:34   

Or he's just "pullling" your leg.

  
k.e..



Posts: 3866
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 19 2017,11:51   

Quote (Bob O'H @ Sep. 19 2017,10:05)
Quote (Texas Teach @ Sep. 18 2017,17:20)
Speaking of that small island, I find it noteworthy that KF uses the time before a big ass hurricane hits him to worry about how others get off.  Good allocation of time there.

That's kind of him, don't you think, to be concerned about the evacuation of the island?

It was a weather report from sodom and gomorrah so he wants only a man and a woman getting off. He's staying behind to give a full report on the debauchery. Expect amorous donkeys and a visit to Magenta for a fallatio demonstration.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
fnxtr



Posts: 2576
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 19 2017,14:13   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Sep. 18 2017,12:34)
 
Quote (JohnW @ Sep. 18 2017,12:06)
 
Quote (Ptaylor @ Sep. 18 2017,02:40)
To top it off, though, KF is declaring that he has never had a blowjob, and never will; oral sex is one of the factors leading civilisation over the cliff! (comment 70 in the UD thread).

Of course it is.  That's why they call it "going down".

And, of course, he has never masturbated.

If you were KF's hand, would you have sex with him?

--------------
"But it's disturbing to think someone actually thinks creationism -- having put it's hand on the hot stove every day for the last 400 years -- will get a different result tomorrow." -- midwifetoad

"I am in a rush to catch up with science work." -- Gary Gaulin

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 2062
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 20 2017,07:26   

Quote (fnxtr @ Sep. 19 2017,14:13)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Sep. 18 2017,12:34)
 
Quote (JohnW @ Sep. 18 2017,12:06)
   
Quote (Ptaylor @ Sep. 18 2017,02:40)
To top it off, though, KF is declaring that he has never had a blowjob, and never will; oral sex is one of the factors leading civilisation over the cliff! (comment 70 in the UD thread).

Of course it is.  That's why they call it "going down".

And, of course, he has never masturbated.

If you were KF's hand, would you have sex with him?

Thomas Cranmer comes to mind.

--------------
...after reviewing the arguments, I’m inclined to believe that the critics of ENCODE’s bold claim were mostly right, and that the proportion of our genome which is functional is probably between 10 and 20%.  --Vincent Torley, uncommondescent.com 1/1/2016

  
k.e..



Posts: 3866
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 20 2017,10:52   

Quote (CeilingCat @ Sep. 20 2017,15:26)
Quote (fnxtr @ Sep. 19 2017,14:13)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Sep. 18 2017,12:34)
   
Quote (JohnW @ Sep. 18 2017,12:06)
   
Quote (Ptaylor @ Sep. 18 2017,02:40)
To top it off, though, KF is declaring that he has never had a blowjob, and never will; oral sex is one of the factors leading civilisation over the cliff! (comment 70 in the UD thread).

Of course it is.  That's why they call it "going down".

And, of course, he has never masturbated.

If you were KF's hand, would you have sex with him?

Thomas Cranmer comes to mind.

So an annulment sought from the Vatican because his hand never consummated?

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
sparc



Posts: 1977
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 20 2017,12:33   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Sep. 18 2017,14:34)
 
Quote (JohnW @ Sep. 18 2017,12:06)
   
Quote (Ptaylor @ Sep. 18 2017,02:40)
To top it off, though, KF is declaring that he has never had a blowjob, and never will; oral sex is one of the factors leading civilisation over the cliff! (comment 70 in the UD thread).

Of course it is.  That's why they call it "going down".

And, of course, he has never masturbated.

Why should someone who knows that    
Quote
fellatio is fast and easily done in just about any corner or alley
(kairosfocus September 18, 2017 at 1:45 am)

--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
Ptaylor



Posts: 1035
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 20 2017,23:30   

A UD suicide:
 
Quote
50
StarbuckSeptember 20, 2017 at 9:27 pm

And how much of this is true of you Barry? You two-bit piece of shit bankruptcy lawyer with awful reviews on BBB? How much better could your career be if your map of reality matched reality? Ya fucking wanker.

UD link, but not for long.
I wouldn't blame Barry for deleting it, but it's fun to see it there in the meantime.

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
Bob O'H



Posts: 2190
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2017,03:47   

Aaagh! In response to this post I want to suggest something to honour Dembski's "reader from Reno" Amazon review (wasn't it of his own book)? But I'm utterly failing to find a description of the fun and games that was had. Can anyone help?

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
k.e..



Posts: 3866
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2017,09:04   

Quote (Bob O'H @ Sep. 21 2017,11:47)
Aaagh! In response to [URL=https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/uncommon-descent-contest-what-should-we-call-the-reviewer-of-a-book-on-evolution-who-seems


-to-be-shouting-amen-fifty-times/]this post[/URL] I want to suggest something to honour Dembski's "reader from Reno" Amazon review (wasn't it of his own book)? But I'm utterly failing to find a description of the fun and games that was had. Can anyone help?

Can't help  but if I recall he only denied it was his for a short time. Whatever, since then his career has blossomed into a low rent fat and fire dynasty somewhere in Texas.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 2062
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2017,10:50   

It was "Reader from Reisel".  It's a small town in Texas.  Dembski wrote the review of his own book on a Canadian branch of Amazon and they exposed his true name.

Googling for      dembski reader from riesel

finds this: http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid....dembski

and this: https://pandasthumb.org/archive....as.html

--------------
...after reviewing the arguments, I’m inclined to believe that the critics of ENCODE’s bold claim were mostly right, and that the proportion of our genome which is functional is probably between 10 and 20%.  --Vincent Torley, uncommondescent.com 1/1/2016

  
Bob O'H



Posts: 2190
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2017,13:42   

Quote (CeilingCat @ Sep. 21 2017,10:50)
It was "Reader from Reisel".  It's a small town in Texas.  Dembski wrote the review of his own book on a Canadian branch of Amazon and they exposed his true name.

Googling for      dembski reader from riesel

finds this: http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid....dembski

and this: https://pandasthumb.org/archive....as.html

Ah, thanks! That was it. Now wonder "reader from Waco" didn't get anything. Was Waco where Dembski had his hotdog stand?

ETA: Ah, it was both Riesel AND Waco...

Edited by Bob O'H on Sep. 21 2017,13:45

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
Texas Teach



Posts: 1493
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2017,16:29   

Quote (Bob O'H @ Sep. 21 2017,13:42)
Quote (CeilingCat @ Sep. 21 2017,10:50)
It was "Reader from Reisel".  It's a small town in Texas.  Dembski wrote the review of his own book on a Canadian branch of Amazon and they exposed his true name.

Googling for      dembski reader from riesel

finds this: http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid....dembski

and this: https://pandasthumb.org/archive....as.html

Ah, thanks! That was it. Now wonder "reader from Waco" didn't get anything. Was Waco where Dembski had his hotdog stand?

ETA: Ah, it was both Riesel AND Waco...

It was Waco where the would let him the cafeteria. ;)

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
  8975 replies since Dec. 29 2013,11:01 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (300) < ... 292 293 294 295 296 [297] 298 299 300 >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]