RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (666) < ... 164 165 166 167 168 [169] 170 171 172 173 174 ... >   
  Topic: The Bathroom Wall, A PT tradition< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,22:10   

Quote (Ftk @ Feb. 10 2008,22:05)
Quote
Hey, Ftk!  What do you think of Anne Coulter?


Some days, I agree with her completely.

Other days, she makes me laugh so hard that I just about puke.

Then there are those times when I wonder if she's playing with a full deck.

Undecided I guess...kinda like the 6,000 vs. 4.5 bill.

That's what I figured.

1. Agreement sometimes.
2. Laughter, because her lies (about the state of evolution, and the gun record of McCain, etc), accusations (about 911 wives, etc), and rants (um, anything) are purely funny.
3. She may be crazy, but that shouldn't be held against her (I may be wrong about your take on this?)
4. Notable lack of critical evaluation of her behavior.

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,22:23   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 10 2008,22:04)
Irony isn't hypocrisy. Your misuse of irony is, though.

PZ doesn't want a law to stop theism, nor does he have a book of fables telling him to stone theists in the public square. He does find the whole enterprise unfortunate for humanity though, I think.

What does it matter whether he wants a law or not??  

His fables are about the universe exploding from *nothing*....what an rediculously unscientific myth.  His method, rather than direct stoning, is to utter every profanity imaginable against religious thought.  He's a self proclaimed "militant" atheist.  I often wonder how far he'd actually take that title.  The hate just flows off the man...reminds me a lot of the Fred Phelps gang here in Topeka.   Pure hate for what they oppose.  It still blows my mind the way he's treated me both privately and publicly.  WHAT KIND OF PROFESSOR TALKS AND ACTS LIKE THAT...and NOBODY calls him on it.  

Anyone who thinks that religion is "unfortunate for humanity" has to be living outside of reality.  All you people focus on is what you believe is the root of all war.  From what I've read, you don't have a leg to stand on in regard to your declaration that religion causes more wars than secular regimes.  

Have you ever stepped foot in a healthy church environment?  Good grief, if you came to my church and left with the impression that what is going on there is "unfortunate for humanity", you'd have to be a complete loon.

Man, I wish I knew what was *wrong* with you people.  All I can figure out is that you must have had some *horrific* experiences with religious folks in the past to believe that religion is as bad as you seem to believe.

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
Zarquon



Posts: 71
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,22:30   

Edit: I regret I made the reference, and I apologise for any offence caused by anyone who read the previous message.

  
Annyday



Posts: 583
Joined: Nov. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,22:32   

Quote (Ftk @ Feb. 10 2008,22:23)
Anyone who thinks that religion is "unfortunate for humanity" has to be living outside of reality.  All you people focus on is what you believe is the root of all war.  From what I've read, you don't have a leg to stand on in regard to your declaration that religion causes more wars than secular regimes.  

Have you ever stepped foot in a healthy church environment?  Good grief, if you came to my church and left with the impression that what is going on there is "unfortunate for humanity", you'd have to be a complete loon.

Man, I wish I knew what was *wrong* with you people.  All I can figure out is that you must have had some *horrific* experiences with religious folks in the past to believe that religion is as bad as you seem to believe.

I'm not even involved in this argument and I feel like you're putting words in my mouth.

--------------
"ALL eight of the "nature" miracles of Jesus could have been accomplished via the electroweak quantum tunneling mechanism. For example, walking on water could be accomplished by directing a neutrino beam created just below Jesus' feet downward." - Frank Tipler, ISCID fellow

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,22:36   

I didn't attack his daughter, you freak.  She commented on a post at *my* blog and then went back to her blog and wrote a post on the topic (even refered to me in the post).

GET. THAT. THROUGH. YOUR. THICK. SKULL.

Three months later, I merely linked to her post and commented on it.

You people do that ALL. THE. FREAKING. TIME.

[That there was a hissy fit, blipes ;) ]

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
Mister DNA



Posts: 466
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,22:39   

My thoughts on Margaret Thatcher...

For all their faults, the Reagan/Thatcher era inspired some kickass punk rock.

--------------
CBEB's: The Church Burnin' Ebola Blog
Thank you, Dr. Dembski. You are without peer when it comes to The Argument Regarding Design. - vesf

    
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,22:49   

Quote (Ftk @ Feb. 10 2008,23:23)
Man, I wish I knew what was *wrong* with you people.  All I can figure out is that you must have had some *horrific* experiences with religious folks in the past to believe that religion is as bad as you seem to believe.

One day a tortoise and a scorpion found themselves facing a swollen river. The scorpion begged the tortoise to carry it across. "I can't take you on my back," the tortoise replied, "You'd sting me."

"Why would I do that?" asked the scorpion. "If I stung you, we'd both drown."

"Well," said the tortoise, "since you put it that way, I guess it will be alright. Hop on."

So, the scorpion climbed on the tortoise's back and they set out across the river. When they almost to the shore, the scorpion stung the tortoise. As they were both slipping beneath the water, the tortoise turned to the scorpion and asked, "Why did you do that? Now we'll both drown."

And the scorpion replied, "I'm a scorpion. It's in my nature. And you knew I was a scorpion when you let me on your back."

IF AtBC is so aversive for you, Ftk, what are you doing here? (And I'll let you decide which creature better represents YOU.)

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,23:04   

"Its just like the story of the grasshopper and the octopus. All year long the grasshopper kept burying acorns for winter while the octopus mooched off his girlfriend and watched TV. Then the winter came, and the grasshopper died, and the octopus ate all his acorns and also he got a racecar. Is any of this getting through to you?"

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Chayanov



Posts: 289
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,23:06   

"Fry, why must you analyze everything with your relentless logic?"

--------------
Help! Marxist literary critics are following me!

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,23:11   

Quote (Chayanov @ Feb. 10 2008,23:06)
"Fry, why must you analyze everything with your relentless logic?"

High-Fives Chayanov!!

Quote
If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate!


--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Chayanov



Posts: 289
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,23:16   

Quote
Brannigan's law is like Brannigan's love: hard and fast.


--------------
Help! Marxist literary critics are following me!

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,23:19   

Quote (Chayanov @ Feb. 10 2008,23:16)
Quote
Brannigan's law is like Brannigan's love: hard and fast.

Quote
We both know you won't get halfway to Vergon 6 before THE CRAVING sets in. Then, you'll come crawling back for some sweet, sweet candy. .....BAM


--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Chayanov



Posts: 289
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,23:21   

Quote
I suffer from a very sexy learning disability. What do I call it, Kif?

*Groan* Sexlexia.


--------------
Help! Marxist literary critics are following me!

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,23:27   

Quote (Chayanov @ Feb. 10 2008,23:21)
Quote
I suffer from a very sexy learning disability. What do I call it, Kif?

*Groan* Sexlexia.

I HAS SELEXIA TOO.

Quote
Come and get it! Welcome to my humble chamber, or as I call it the lovenasium. Cham-pag-en?


--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,23:27   

Quote
IF AtBC is so aversive for you, Ftk, what are you doing here? (And I'll let you decide which creature better represents YOU.)


Well, Bill, it's like this....

A person, who I now somewhat consider a friend, started a thread here at AtBC and I started receiving hits on my sitemeter which clued me in to the fact that a group of Darwinists were making fun of me on a daily basis.

Unlike most of the other ID supporters, I still have a dream.  My dream is that one day people will lay aside their petty differences, which seem to be based on personal philosophy, and allow our students to consider all the facts from both sides of this debate.  

Also, unlike most of the other ID supporters, I've always believed it might be of benefit to try to actually get to know those who are tossing arrows and having a grand time making fun of us.  I thought, perhaps...just perhaps, if I got to know some of you, I wouldn't loath you so much for treating me like crap.  

Well, not terribly surprising to me, it worked.  After getting to know many of you, I find it pretty difficult to loath you.  

But, like the turtle, I always wonder when you're going to turn on me...which is why I find it difficult not to peek in here.  I keep thinking...heck, eventually they're going to tire of reading my blog and just let my thread float away.  But, that never happens.  Whatever I write is discussed here at length, and everyone gets their jollies making fun of me.  

The problem is that, although I've learned the true nature of the Scorpion, I never seem to be able to let go of the dream...

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
J. O'Donnell



Posts: 98
Joined: Sep. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,23:28   

Quote (Ftk @ Feb. 10 2008,18:28)
You people are savages....it's rubbed off on me, and now I'm part of the problem when I enter ATbC bizzaro world.

I've never seen you act like anything other than a dishonest, lying and disingenuous twit myself.

Quote

Unlike most of the other ID supporters, I still have a dream.  My dream is that one day people will lay aside their petty differences, which seem to be based on personal philosophy, and allow our students to consider all the facts from both sides of this debate.  


Creationists don't get to make up 'facts' as they see fit. If there was something to the 'facts', well I should say non-existant facts that are basically regurgitated poorly disguised creationists arguments that were refuted years ago redressed, there would be something to debate.

But as time has marched on and the ID movement has still produced no science and is still arguing against cartoon positions of their opponents (without moving on their arguments, just like the creationists of old), we get more hostile and bored of their general lying.

Quote
I thought, perhaps...just perhaps, if I got to know some of you, I wouldn't loath you so much for treating me like crap.  


I've merely observed you, not said anything much to you at all for the majority of time here and I can see once again you reaffirm my initial statement in this post. Your attack on PZ Myers daughter, your [as yet unsupported] accusations against Eugine Scott and other atheists confirm to me why I revile and reject Christianity. You were my final straw after I had seen how the likes of other "Christians" like Sal, Nelson etc operated in their 'lying for Jesus'. I realised I could no longer call myself Christian and still maintain the facade of thinking that Christian morality and principals were truly right.

I tried to argue with myself that maybe the likes of Ken Miller and others were examples of Christians that I could follow. But I realised, especially after personal events that happened to me last year, that I didn't need role models of any religion, idea or similar and that I needed to develop the personal strength to have my own convictions as to what I feel is right. I've developed that now and I'll never look back.

Salvadore, Pat Robinson, Fred Phelps and many others have proven to me that religion is poisonous, where you need to maintain a facade of being strong through lying and threatening people with hellfire. That's what convinces me that Christianity is false, that it has to support itself through distorting known evidence and through petty threats. I've realised I can never accept a God that has to force people to believe through petty threats and that needs 'defenders' who have to distort evidence and misrepresent the good work of others in understanding our corner of the universe.

--------------
My blog: Animacules

   
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,23:32   

Quote (J. O'Donnell @ Feb. 10 2008,23:28)
Quote (Ftk @ Feb. 10 2008,18:28)
You people are savages....it's rubbed off on me, and now I'm part of the problem when I enter ATbC bizzaro world.

I've never seen you act like anything other than a dishonest, lying and disingenuous twit myself.

Oh, that's another reason why I keep coming back.  To defend myself.  I've never been anything other than honest....yet, "twits" like this clown keep accusing me of dishonesty.

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
J. O'Donnell



Posts: 98
Joined: Sep. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,23:41   

Quote (Ftk @ Feb. 10 2008,23:32)
Quote (J. O'Donnell @ Feb. 10 2008,23:28)
 
Quote (Ftk @ Feb. 10 2008,18:28)
You people are savages....it's rubbed off on me, and now I'm part of the problem when I enter ATbC bizzaro world.

I've never seen you act like anything other than a dishonest, lying and disingenuous twit myself.

Oh, that's another reason why I keep coming back.  To defend myself.  I've never been anything other than honest....yet, "twits" like this clown keep accusing me of dishonesty.

Have you substantiated your attacks on Eugine Scott that you made earlier?

*crickets*

I think not. You did give a false notpology, but yes, you are a disingenuous twit and as the Eugine Scott incident proves, you are indeed an A grade liar. Otherwise you wouldn't have said something you knew was false and never happened yes?

--------------
My blog: Animacules

   
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,23:44   

Interesting choice of quote pulling, Kristine.  I don't suppose you listened to the message in it's entirety.  

I also don't suppose that you took the time to consider that how parents raise their children does have a ripple affect on generations that follow.  

I personally don't follow how God's warning in regard to how we were designed to live is a detriment to our lives.  He's telling us to raise our children wisely, or our sins will become there sins as well.  Unfortunately, we find that this happens all to often.

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
1of63



Posts: 126
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2008,23:46   

Quote (Ftk @ Feb. 10 2008,22:23)
Have you ever stepped foot in a healthy church environment?  Good grief, if you came to my church and left with the impression that what is going on there is "unfortunate for humanity", you'd have to be a complete loon.

Thought experiment:  your church runs the government.  What would be its policies towards people who are atheist or gay or both?  Would they be citizens?  Would they have the vote?  Would they be eligible to run for public office?

As a kid, I was in what seemed to be a "health church environment".  Ordinary, decent people trying to live by Christ's teachings.  Wouldn't have touched televangelists with a bargepole.  Would've seen the right-wing fundies as little better than incipient Taliban or Nazis.  Would've thought the Phelps bunch were quite mad - or maybe tools of Satan.

But I don't remember, if I ever knew, where they stood on things like atheism or homosexuality, so:

Theology: where does your church stand on the morality of The Flood, for example?  Millions, perhaps billions, drowned because a God who, by definition, can't make mistakes, decides He's made one.  

And even if you assume all the adults had sinned and deserved to die, the same can't be said of all the kids that would have died.

And you're supposed to be "For the kids".

Sure, PZ and the other leading atheists would like to see religious belief erased from human culture.  Doesn't mean they'd wipe out the entire human race bar a handful of atheists to do it.  But the God you worship - what is it with 'worship', anyway - claims to have done just that and was right to do it.

You see the problem?

--------------
I set expectations at zero, and FL limbos right under them. - Tracy P. Hamilton

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2008,00:03   

Quote (J. O'Donnell @ Feb. 10 2008,23:28)
Quote (Ftk @ Feb. 10 2008,18:28)
You people are savages....it's rubbed off on me, and now I'm part of the problem when I enter ATbC bizzaro world.

I've never seen you act like anything other than a dishonest, lying and disingenuous twit myself.

Quote

Unlike most of the other ID supporters, I still have a dream.  My dream is that one day people will lay aside their petty differences, which seem to be based on personal philosophy, and allow our students to consider all the facts from both sides of this debate.  


Creationists don't get to make up 'facts' as they see fit. If there was something to the 'facts', well I should say non-existant facts that are basically regurgitated poorly disguised creationists arguments that were refuted years ago redressed, there would be something to debate.

But as time has marched on and the ID movement has still produced no science and is still arguing against cartoon positions of their opponents (without moving on their arguments, just like the creationists of old), we get more hostile and bored of their general lying.

Quote
I thought, perhaps...just perhaps, if I got to know some of you, I wouldn't loath you so much for treating me like crap.  


I've merely observed you, not said anything much to you at all for the majority of time here and I can see once again you reaffirm my initial statement in this post. Your attack on PZ Myers daughter, your [as yet unsupported] accusations against Eugine Scott and other atheists confirm to me why I revile and reject Christianity. You were my final straw after I had seen how the likes of other "Christians" like Sal, Nelson etc operated in their 'lying for Jesus'. I realised I could no longer call myself Christian and still maintain the facade of thinking that Christian morality and principals were truly right.

I tried to argue with myself that maybe the likes of Ken Miller and others were examples of Christians that I could follow. But I realised, especially after personal events that happened to me last year, that I didn't need role models of any religion, idea or similar and that I needed to develop the personal strength to have my own convictions as to what I feel is right. I've developed that now and I'll never look back.

Salvadore, Pat Robinson, Fred Phelps and many others have proven to me that religion is poisonous, where you need to maintain a facade of being strong through lying and threatening people with hellfire. That's what convinces me that Christianity is false, that it has to support itself through distorting known evidence and through petty threats. I've realised I can never accept a God that has to force people to believe through petty threats and that needs 'defenders' who have to distort evidence and misrepresent the good work of others in understanding our corner of the universe.

Well, hey, good for you.  You have someone to blame your rejection of God upon.  Tell it to Him at the pearly gate...

I didn't attack Skatje...I didn't attack Eugenie.  I've watched Eugenie play out her "priests with a backward collar routine".  She sure had an affect on my Uncle.  He bought her story hook, line and sinker when she lectured at a church alongside a preacher.  He even sent me the video to view hoping that I would believe a preacher.

Eugenie may not consider herself being deceptive in this regard, but it's hard for me to sit here and not question her motives when she makes statements like <i>"I have found that the most effective allies for evolution are people of the faith community. One clergyman with a backward collar is worth two biologists at a school board meeting any day!"</i>  When I first read that interview, I could absolutely not believe she said that.  

It's interesting that the link I used for that quote at my blog is not longer a workable one.  I'll have to try to locate that interview if it hasn't been erased from public domain.

She also goes on and on and on about evolution being a fact, yet when I listened to her lecture...her facts centered on the obvious microveolutionary changes of coloring in mice and moths.  Good grief...!  Look at these mice...can't you tell that evolution is a fact?  Those creationists are simply silly... like dowsers.  God, what a horrific association.  

I'm sorry, but I believe what I say about Eugenie...no lies involved.

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
J. O'Donnell



Posts: 98
Joined: Sep. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2008,00:12   

Quote (Ftk @ Feb. 11 2008,00:03)
Well, hey, good for you.  You have someone to blame your rejection of God upon.  Tell it to Him at the pearly gate...

I have a lot of people to blame, in many ways myself included for deluding myself into believing something because I thought it was right, when I was just lacking the personal strength to deal with things on my own.

Quote
I didn't attack Skatje...I didn't attack Eugenie.


Facts disagree with you.

Quote
I've watched Eugenie play out her "priests with a backward collar routine".  She sure had an affect on my Uncle.  He bought her story hook, line and sinker when she lectured at a church alongside a preacher.  He even sent me the video to view hoping that I would believe a preacher.


So?

Here's a care cup \_/

Quote
Eugenie may not consider herself being deceptive in this regard, but it's hard for me to sit here and not question her motives when she makes statements like <i>"I have found that the most effective allies for evolution are people of the faith community. One clergyman with a backward collar is worth two biologists at a school board meeting any day!"</i>  When I first read that interview, I could absolutely not believe she said that.  


It's both correct and logical. You prove without a shadow of a doubt to me that the faithful refuse to listen to anyone other than themselves. So people of faith who also understand what they are talking about when it comes to science are naturally more likely to be listened to by people of faith. This is basic logic 101. I am sure many people as a general rule prefer to listen to people whose views are more compatible with those they hold as well. Especially again as this is to counter a common creationist lie that Christians have to choose between science and their religion. Incidentally despite my "fall" (haha in-joke) to Atheism I [unlike Professor Myers] do not think religion is incompatible with science.

Quote
It's interesting that the link I used for that quote at my blog is not longer a workable one.  I'll have to try to locate that interview if it hasn't been erased from public domain.


I have never disputed the quote, only what YOU SAID. You have not backed it up. You have not supported it. You have fabricated a lie.

Do you know what lying is? It's saying something you know isn't true.

Quote
I'm sorry, but I believe what I say about Eugenie...no lies involved.


I don't care if you believed it, what is disputed is if the incident you claimed happened occurred or not. As you have yet to substantiate the claim, your argument above is irrelevant and yes, you are still lying if you did not actually hear what you claimed.

Do you understand the difference? Do you understand why everyone on this board has had their wick of you and confines your posts to the forum toilet?

There is a difference between disliking Eugine Scotts opinion and fabricating things into her mouth she didn't say.

--------------
My blog: Animacules

   
Chayanov



Posts: 289
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2008,00:15   

But in ftk's relativistic world, she imagined that Scott could have said it, therefore it really isn't a lie. Just like how the earth is simultaneously billions and thousands of years old. Everything's true, so long as you believe it could be true!

--------------
Help! Marxist literary critics are following me!

  
1of63



Posts: 126
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2008,00:27   

Quote (Mister DNA @ Feb. 10 2008,22:39)
My thoughts on Margaret Thatcher...

For all their faults, the Reagan/Thatcher era inspired some kickass punk rock.

Okay, so nobody's perfect.

--------------
I set expectations at zero, and FL limbos right under them. - Tracy P. Hamilton

  
Richard Simons



Posts: 425
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2008,00:36   

Quote (Ftk @ Feb. 11 2008,00:03)
I'm sorry, but I believe what I say about Eugenie...no lies involved.

You still don't get it, do you? You presented us with what you claimed were facts, but were completely unable to back them up with any evidence other than your opinion. I've lost count how many times people here have pointed out to you that your opinions are neither facts nor evidence yet you are still treating them as the same.

When you make accusations against other people as though they are fact but are unable to justify them except by retreating to 'I believe what I say', in my book you have come so close to lying as to make no real difference. How would you feel if I were to come to your church and announce to people that I knew for a fact that you abused your children, but when pressed for evidence I fell back on 'Well, I believe it to be true'? Before making accusations against Eugenie Scott or PZ or anyone you should make absolutely certain that it is true, with robust evidence to back you up, and that it's not just an intense personal dislike. But I'm not a Christian - what do I know about morals?

--------------
All sweeping statements are wrong.

  
J. O'Donnell



Posts: 98
Joined: Sep. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2008,00:42   

Quote
Before making accusations against Eugenie Scott or PZ or anyone you should make absolutely certain that it is true, with robust evidence to back you up, and that it's not just an intense personal dislike. But I'm not a Christian - what do I know about morals?


This is exactly what I've begun to realise, that Christians do not seem to recognise that morality =/ Christianity (quite the opposite). FTK claims that she faces considerable antagonism towards her from people here, but if she actually reads what she writes she would realise she generates the antagonism because she is being antagonistic to begin with.

--------------
My blog: Animacules

   
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2008,00:55   

Quote (1of63 @ Feb. 10 2008,23:46)
Quote (Ftk @ Feb. 10 2008,22:23)
Have you ever stepped foot in a healthy church environment?  Good grief, if you came to my church and left with the impression that what is going on there is "unfortunate for humanity", you'd have to be a complete loon.

Thought experiment:  your church runs the government.  What would be its policies towards people who are atheist or gay or both?  Would they be citizens?  Would they have the vote?  Would they be eligible to run for public office?

As a kid, I was in what seemed to be a "health church environment".  Ordinary, decent people trying to live by Christ's teachings.  Wouldn't have touched televangelists with a bargepole.  Would've seen the right-wing fundies as little better than incipient Taliban or Nazis.  Would've thought the Phelps bunch were quite mad - or maybe tools of Satan.

But I don't remember, if I ever knew, where they stood on things like atheism or homosexuality, so:

Theology: where does your church stand on the morality of The Flood, for example?  Millions, perhaps billions, drowned because a God who, by definition, can't make mistakes, decides He's made one.  

And even if you assume all the adults had sinned and deserved to die, the same can't be said of all the kids that would have died.

And you're supposed to be "For the kids".

Sure, PZ and the other leading atheists would like to see religious belief erased from human culture.  Doesn't mean they'd wipe out the entire human race bar a handful of atheists to do it.  But the God you worship - what is it with 'worship', anyway - claims to have done just that and was right to do it.

You see the problem?

In regard to the flood:

The problem that I see is that neither one of us were there, so all we can do is speculate.  Based on the few paragraphs in scripture, I could demand that God was unfair, or I could consider that perhaps He knew best what the future held.  My church does not stand rigid on the facts surrounding the flood.  Pastor often talks about shouts and whispers in scripture.  There are basic tenants of Christianity which are loud and clear.  Other issues are more of a whisper and not something to split a church over.  

I trust that whatever the circumstances were during the time of the worldwide or local flood, God's involvement was a necessity.

I can choose to reject God because of something I don't fully understand, or I can consider His powerful hand in the vast complexity of creation.  I watch people who authentically follow Him, and I see His involvement in their lives.  It's very easy for me to understand that nature could not display such intense complexity without a designer.  Logic tells us that it's impossible for anything to appear out of no where, and if a Creator exists, it's certainly possible that there is some reason for our existence.  


Quote
What would be its policies towards people who are atheist or gay or both?


They'd love them like anyone else.  They'd certainly be welcome, though they would not considered for church leadership unless they grew to accept Christ as their Savior.  Our church has various groups and activities for those in every level of their relationship with God.  From those who question their beliefs to those who are strong in their faith.

Quote
Would they be citizens?  Would they have the vote?  Would they be eligible to run for public office?


If you mean in regard to citizens of the US...certainly.  Of course they have a right to vote and run for public office outside of the Christian church.  As far as gay marriage, I wouldn't vote for it because I believe that marriage should be between and man and a woman.  I don't have a particular problem with civil unions.  If gay marriage because legal, there wouldn't be anything I could do about it...though, if a church approved of gay marriage, I would look for another.  If a church supports gay marriage, then they are rejecting God's word.

According to the Apostle Paul, it is not the right for Christians to condemn the *world*, but rather their obligation is to keep the church from heresy.  
1 Corinthians 5:9-12.

And, yes, I get "worship".  For quite some time I didn't get the worship part, and now I know what I was missing.

I'll be leaving now because the fall out from this post is going to be off the charts.

Good night...

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2008,02:57   

Quote (Ftk @ Feb. 11 2008,00:55)
In regard to the flood:

The problem that I see is that neither one of us were there, so all we can do is speculate.  Based on the few paragraphs in scripture, I could demand that God was unfair, or I could consider that perhaps He knew best what the future held.  My church does not stand rigid on the facts surrounding the flood.

Ah, so you are admittting that Walt's book is nothing but idle speculation?

Good stuff, and progress is made.

After all, neither you nor Walt was there, right?

Thing is, I know some jellyfish who were there. In a way. A roundabout way.

FTK, the jellyfish were there! Do you want to listen to what *they* have to say?

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Wesley R. Elsberry



Posts: 4991
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2008,03:57   

Part of NCSE's tips for testifying at school board meetings:

Quote

9. Call on the clergy.  Pro-evolution clergy are essential to refuting the idea that evolution is incompatible with faith.  Voices for Evolution contains useful statements from mainline religious organizations (Catholic, Protestant, Jewish) affirming that evolution is compatible with their theology. If no member of the clergy is available to testify, be sure to have someone do so- the religious issue must be addressed in order to resolve the controversy successfully.


That's because religiously-motivated antievolution is a socio-political stance, not one that is primarily driven by consideration of the scientific issues. This remains the case whether pointed out by someone who personally is an atheist materialist or by a theist. There is no dishonesty involved in recognizing -- and publicly noting -- this fact. Even if one denies that the observed state of affairs is a fact (though the evidence is overwhelming that it is), it remains an arguable position to advocate, and thus also not one that can be used to label someone noting it as "dishonest".

Not that I expect that to get through Morton's Demon...

--------------
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

    
PTET



Posts: 133
Joined: Jan. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2008,04:55   

Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Feb. 11 2008,03:57)
Part of NCSE's tips for testifying at school board meetings:

     
Quote

9. Call on the clergy.  Pro-evolution clergy are essential to refuting the idea that evolution is incompatible with faith.  Voices for Evolution contains useful statements from mainline religious organizations (Catholic, Protestant, Jewish) affirming that evolution is compatible with their theology. If no member of the clergy is available to testify, be sure to have someone do so- the religious issue must be addressed in order to resolve the controversy successfully.


That's because religiously-motivated antievolution is a socio-political stance, not one that is primarily driven by consideration of the scientific issues. This remains the case whether pointed out by someone who personally is an atheist materialist or by a theist. There is no dishonesty involved in recognizing -- and publicly noting -- this fact. Even if one denies that the observed state of affairs is a fact (though the evidence is overwhelming that it is), it remains an arguable position to advocate, and thus also not one that can be used to label someone noting it as "dishonest".

Not that I expect that to get through Morton's Demon...

Morton's Demon then denies the faith of those denying the science of creationism. Here's Wakefield Tolbert from yesterday:

"If one is not going to follow any Biblical ordinance and then have links to atheist resources as a kind of “failsafe” to any other argument, then for all practical purposes you have what Darek Barefoot has called “provisional atheism”—-in other words a situation where many people MIGHT posit some kind of vague notion or faith in a higher power but God is not part of their regular lives outside of Chapel at Easter and so they might as well join the other camp, especially if mockery is their forte’ and modus operandi for 99% of all conversations about religion."

If there isn't a comedy flowchart showing Morton's Demon/The Creationists Mind in action, there oughta be.



[edit: ty for edit button]

--------------
"It’s not worth the effort to prove the obvious. Ridiculous ideas don’t deserve our time.
Even the attempt to formulate ID is a generous accommodation." - ScottAndrews

   
  19967 replies since Jan. 17 2006,08:38 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (666) < ... 164 165 166 167 168 [169] 170 171 172 173 174 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]