RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (595) < ... 590 591 592 593 594 [595] >   
  Topic: A Separate Thread for Gary Gaulin, As big as the poop that does not look< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5121
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: July 17 2017,06:56   

Speaking of answering questions:

www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/6nhiv6/so_whats_the_current_state_of_verification_of/

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
ChemiCat



Posts: 403
Joined: Nov. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: July 17 2017,11:21   

Quote
Speaking of answering questions:


He swerves, he ducks and runs head first into the wall!

  
Henry J



Posts: 4652
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: July 17 2017,12:09   

Quote (ChemiCat @ July 17 2017,10:21)
Quote
Speaking of answering questions:


He swerves, he ducks and runs head first into the wall!

Maybe he was written that way?

  
N.Wells



Posts: 1749
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: July 17 2017,14:13   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ July 17 2017,06:56)
Speaking of answering questions:

www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/6nhiv6/so_whats_the_current_state_of_verification_of/

Quote
MaceWumpusphilosophy of science, history of philosophy 1 point 19 hours ago

It seems that you have very little understanding of the character of either cognitive science or philosophy as a discipline---let alone the use of the specific terminology that you're applying here. I'm not sure where you got your misunderstandings from, but if you're interested in machine learning I would recommend the work of Kevin Kelly or Oliver Schulte. On probabilistic models of confirmation more broadly, the SEP page I linked in my original reply has a variety of sources. And on cognitive science, I'd suggest the work of Ned Block or Dan Dennett.
 
.......

Those claims had little to no basis in fact so far as I can tell, and I know quite a bit about the relevant areas of the discipline; nor do you bother to cite any articles that evidence your position. The only conclusion worth reaching is that you're a blowhard and you have no idea what you're talking about.


I have to agree with Mace on that.

  
ChemiCat



Posts: 403
Joined: Nov. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: July 22 2017,05:58   

Quote
Speaking of answering questions:


So when are you going to start, Gaulin?

  
JohnW



Posts: 2809
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 23 2017,19:30   

Quote (ChemiCat @ July 22 2017,03:58)
Quote
Speaking of answering questions:


So when are you going to start, Gaulin?

He's not going to start.  He's just going to speak of it.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
  17825 replies since Oct. 31 2012,02:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (595) < ... 590 591 592 593 594 [595] >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]