RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (527) < ... 275 276 277 278 279 [280] 281 282 283 284 285 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 5, Return To Teh Dingbat Buffet< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Bob O'H



Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 11 2017,07:32   

Quote (fnxtr @ June 10 2017,14:38)
Quote (k.e.. @ June 10 2017,08:08)
Quote (stevestory @ June 08 2017,00:58)
I've actually come around to the idea that whether one is theist or atheist is more a consequence of personality than analysis.

M8 you should check out Joseph Campbell. Tbere are some among us who believe in God who we will call Theists and some who don't who will call Atheists.Neither  choice excludes the other. Thou art that.

God made me an atheist. What am I supposed to do, deny His great plan?

Go on. Try that argument on Barry. But after I've renewed my popcorn franchise.

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: June 11 2017,11:03   

Quote
]kmidpuddle June 11, 2017 at 9:59 am
Her guidelines for getting a gender studies paper published is the best description of KF’s writing style that I have ever seen. For those who don’t want to waste time watching the video, here they are:

1) Use pretentious jargon (never use a monosyllabic word when you can use a polysyllabic one)

2) Be condescending towards established facts and logic.

3) Misdirect readers with irrelevant citations.

Sorry, the irony was just too delicious to ignore. 🙂

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: June 12 2017,17:25   

A conservative Christian transsexual just ripped Barry and KF a new one by showing them how moronic their views on homosexuality and sexual identity are.
Quote
SteRusJonJune 12, 2017 at 3:45 pm
I see there have been several posts related to my comment #26.

Let me address portions of various ones.

First, I did not actually state that I am transgender. But, for the record, I will now so stipulate.

I do not believe I am defective or disordered or pathological. I believe that it may be some defective or disordered or pathological process or event is responsible for my present state. There was a time, long ago, that I thought there was something defective with me. I implored for healing. It never came. God left me to my own devices to deal with a state of being that is fully male anatomically and more female than male mentally/psychologically. I know some hold that my mental state is subject to my will but I assure you that it is in fact contrary to my will. For those of you who hold that gender identity is a choice, I ask, “Can you tell be what was that time and place that you made the choice? Do you awake in the morning and choose your gender for the day? Do you think you could “will” yourself to be of the opposite gender for the day?” I do not, any longer, believe I am defective. There is discussion of what is “normal’ in the comments above. I do not believe there is a normal. There is a spectrum of mixed “sex” related characteristics in individuals. Instead of “normal”, I see that there are “ideals”. An “ideal” male and an “ideal” female with all of us actual persons distributed somewhere in between. Fortunately, most are clustered on one end or the other of the spectrum.. Problem is, without the omniscience of God, I have no idea what the correct blend of characteristics, both physical and psychological, would be to satisfy those two ideals. What I have come to realize is that just as the Psamlist knew he was knit together by God in his mother’s womb, I know, so was I.

Kf seems to believe that I and others like me are intent on destroying western civilization in some great conspiracy. I am not part of some grand scheme. I and so many of others who are marginalized in one or more ways want nothing more to live or lives in peace. Those of us who are essentially conservative have been forced to make unholy alliance with the enemy of our enemies to press for protection from those that would prevent that. Those of us who are more liberal are not convinced switch sides by rhetoric that demonizes us individually by claiming we are out to destroy the world system in some grand scheme when all we want is to keep our job, not be spit upon, keep our families together, have our children attend school safely and come out as productive members of society, Live in the neighborhood of our choice in a home within our means instead of denied housing.

There is discussion of morality. What is moral about a father and mother casting their teen-aged child out onto the street for a deviation from the ideal? Where is the morality in firing and otherwise acceptable, even exemplary, employee when it is discovered or revealed that they are transgender thereby causing them and their family to suffer great losses? How is it moral to refuse to rent to an obvious transgender person who has the means to pay and the character to be a good tenant? I know that a major flash point is the bathroom issue that has been brought to the fore in an effort to save our civilization from decay. I am sympathetic to the concerns of many. But I, also, know that much of what the conservative right puts forward in making its case is deceptive, at best, or downright wrong in many respects. The harm that these laws are ostensibly meant to prevent are already legislated against by uncontroversial legislation. God knows these laws are rooted in the need for some to protect our civilization from the perverts who would destroy us all. I won’t go any further on that topic. Point is, we are judged by God on how it is that we treat one another as individuals. Not on how well or hard we worked to fix the world. If we did a much better job of caring for each other the world would be a much better place, automatically.

I acknowledge that there are some who have gone to extreme in their reaction to the harms done to us in the past. I can understand the the over-reaction but I am not in favor of it. But, please, recognize that that there has been and there continues to be actions that harm us as human beings made, imperfectly, in the image of God.

Te plight and struggles of each transgender individual are unique to themselves. While many who try to live more as their inner identity dictates have difficulty and continue to struggle, but with different problems, there are many more that succeed in making their live more fulfilling. I wonder if those who are so staunchly against the decision of transgender individuals to live in accord with their inner identity have ever read the autobiographical accounts of anyone who has made a successful transition. How can one begin to have empathy for the someone with out hearing their story? Many of us have stepped back from the brink of suicide before making the choice to become and be the person within either by changing the anatomy or ignoring the anatomy that indicates the contrary. I assure you, if it was a simple matter of a willful choice, it would have been easy. If you think it is simply a choice, that is proof positive you have no idea what the true situation is.

The orthodox Christian view is that the soul resides in the body. I ask those who agree with that, “Do you believe the soul more closely conforms to the anatomy or to the psyche?” Keep in mind that in the resurrection, Jesus tells us, “They are like the angels, ….” when speaking of whose wife the widow would be. I think sex anatomy is a temporary state intended for procreation in this physical world and is not even carried over into the next. If God where to be merciful to me and grant my request to heal me, (not that I any longer believe I need healing,) I wonder if He would change my identity as a person to conform to my anatomy, or, change my anatomy to conform to my identity as a person? Do you have such wisdom so as to make the correct call?

Stephen (aka Stephanie)

PS This is an edit. I see that there are post that were made while I put these thoughts together so this does not cover everything above.

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 12 2017,19:53   

What thread are those quotes from?

  
Jkrebs



Posts: 590
Joined: Sep. 2004

(Permalink) Posted: June 12 2017,20:00   

https://uncommondescent.com/academi....-633594

  
Tony M Nyphot



Posts: 491
Joined: June 2008

(Permalink) Posted: June 12 2017,20:51   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ June 12 2017,16:25)
A conservative Christian transsexual just ripped Barry and KF a new one by showing them how moronic their views on homosexuality and sexual identity are.
   
Quote
SteRusJonJune 12, 2017 at 3:45 pm
I see there have been several posts related to my comment #26.

Let me address portions of various ones.

First, I did not actually state that I am transgender. But, for the record, I will now so stipulate.

I do not believe I am defective or disordered or pathological. I believe that it may be some defective or disordered or pathological process or event is responsible for my present state. There was a time, long ago, that I thought there was something defective with me. I implored for healing. It never came. God left me to my own devices to deal with a state of being that is fully male anatomically and more female than male mentally/psychologically. I know some hold that my mental state is subject to my will but I assure you that it is in fact contrary to my will. For those of you who hold that gender identity is a choice, I ask, “Can you tell be what was that time and place that you made the choice? Do you awake in the morning and choose your gender for the day? Do you think you could “will” yourself to be of the opposite gender for the day?” I do not, any longer, believe I am defective. There is discussion of what is “normal’ in the comments above. I do not believe there is a normal. There is a spectrum of mixed “sex” related characteristics in individuals. Instead of “normal”, I see that there are “ideals”. An “ideal” male and an “ideal” female with all of us actual persons distributed somewhere in between. Fortunately, most are clustered on one end or the other of the spectrum.. Problem is, without the omniscience of God, I have no idea what the correct blend of characteristics, both physical and psychological, would be to satisfy those two ideals. What I have come to realize is that just as the Psamlist knew he was knit together by God in his mother’s womb, I know, so was I.

Kf seems to believe that I and others like me are intent on destroying western civilization in some great conspiracy. I am not part of some grand scheme. I and so many of others who are marginalized in one or more ways want nothing more to live or lives in peace. Those of us who are essentially conservative have been forced to make unholy alliance with the enemy of our enemies to press for protection from those that would prevent that. Those of us who are more liberal are not convinced switch sides by rhetoric that demonizes us individually by claiming we are out to destroy the world system in some grand scheme when all we want is to keep our job, not be spit upon, keep our families together, have our children attend school safely and come out as productive members of society, Live in the neighborhood of our choice in a home within our means instead of denied housing.

There is discussion of morality. What is moral about a father and mother casting their teen-aged child out onto the street for a deviation from the ideal? Where is the morality in firing and otherwise acceptable, even exemplary, employee when it is discovered or revealed that they are transgender thereby causing them and their family to suffer great losses? How is it moral to refuse to rent to an obvious transgender person who has the means to pay and the character to be a good tenant? I know that a major flash point is the bathroom issue that has been brought to the fore in an effort to save our civilization from decay. I am sympathetic to the concerns of many. But I, also, know that much of what the conservative right puts forward in making its case is deceptive, at best, or downright wrong in many respects. The harm that these laws are ostensibly meant to prevent are already legislated against by uncontroversial legislation. God knows these laws are rooted in the need for some to protect our civilization from the perverts who would destroy us all. I won’t go any further on that topic. Point is, we are judged by God on how it is that we treat one another as individuals. Not on how well or hard we worked to fix the world. If we did a much better job of caring for each other the world would be a much better place, automatically.

I acknowledge that there are some who have gone to extreme in their reaction to the harms done to us in the past. I can understand the the over-reaction but I am not in favor of it. But, please, recognize that that there has been and there continues to be actions that harm us as human beings made, imperfectly, in the image of God.

Te plight and struggles of each transgender individual are unique to themselves. While many who try to live more as their inner identity dictates have difficulty and continue to struggle, but with different problems, there are many more that succeed in making their live more fulfilling. I wonder if those who are so staunchly against the decision of transgender individuals to live in accord with their inner identity have ever read the autobiographical accounts of anyone who has made a successful transition. How can one begin to have empathy for the someone with out hearing their story? Many of us have stepped back from the brink of suicide before making the choice to become and be the person within either by changing the anatomy or ignoring the anatomy that indicates the contrary. I assure you, if it was a simple matter of a willful choice, it would have been easy. If you think it is simply a choice, that is proof positive you have no idea what the true situation is.

The orthodox Christian view is that the soul resides in the body. I ask those who agree with that, “Do you believe the soul more closely conforms to the anatomy or to the psyche?” Keep in mind that in the resurrection, Jesus tells us, “They are like the angels, ….” when speaking of whose wife the widow would be. I think sex anatomy is a temporary state intended for procreation in this physical world and is not even carried over into the next. If God where to be merciful to me and grant my request to heal me, (not that I any longer believe I need healing,) I wonder if He would change my identity as a person to conform to my anatomy, or, change my anatomy to conform to my identity as a person? Do you have such wisdom so as to make the correct call?

Stephen (aka Stephanie)

PS This is an edit. I see that there are post that were made while I put these thoughts together so this does not cover everything above.

Soon followed by a response from that loving Christian victim we know as StephenB:
 
Quote
The problem is that most in the LGBT “community,” the major institutions, and a dumbed-down culture, all salivate at the prospect and the reality of persecuting *us.* It is we who have been slandered and accused of hate for defending the family, abused by courts who attacked our institution of marriage, violated by schools who brainwashed our children with pro-homosexual propaganda, flattened by a gay juggernaut that destroyed businesses and businessmen, and deprived of our constitutional right to practice religious liberty by an unrelenting gay lobby who once told us, as the transgenders are telling us now, that all they really wanted was economic justice and fair treatment.


--------------
"I, OTOH, am an underachiever...I either pee my pants or faint dead away..." FTK

"You could always wrap fresh fish in the paper you publish it on, though, and sell that." - Field Man on how to find value in Gary Gaulin's real-science "theory"

  
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 12 2017,22:15   

That's why "QED" was invented.

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
Jkrebs



Posts: 590
Joined: Sep. 2004

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2017,10:26   

In case you were wondering, this is from StephenB, "for the record:

Quote
For the record, angels do not have gender. The are pure spirits without physical form. God did not make them to reproduce. On the other hand, humans were designed for that very purpose. There is that word again–“purpose” — which determines the morality of sexual behavior and the conditions that define its misuse.


This is from the guy who is also sure that there is natural moral law.

  
Jkrebs



Posts: 590
Joined: Sep. 2004

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2017,11:03   

The whole thread has been pretty interesting. From the same person that gave us the fact that angels have no gender, StephenB tells us the following aspects of natural moral law, in case you needed to know and were worried about possible immoral behavior.

jdk: "Is oral sex immoral, … even limited to married couples?"

SB: "Most moral theologians say oral sex is moral only as foreplay and only if it is mutually acceptable, but it is not moral if brought to completion. That is because every sexual act, to be moral, must be open to the transmission of life upon completion. Some moral theologians say it is completely wrong regardless of context."

jdk: "Masturbation?"

SB: "Same conditions as above. Immoral as a completed act. Always wrong outside of marriage."

jdk: "Do those acts “self-evidently fulfill or conform our nature”, or not?"

SB: "The behavioral standards for the natural moral law are not always self evident. They are often the product of moral reflection and reasoned analysis. According to the natural moral law, the purpose of sex is to create a unitive bond of love between husband and wife and to procreate. The point is that the unitive function cannot be morally separated from the procreative function. Only on those conditions can the good of both spouses be preserved. Everything turns on purpose."

  
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2017,12:28   

Somebody should tell those people that God is under no obligation to regard their purposes as Her own.

  
Tony M Nyphot



Posts: 491
Joined: June 2008

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2017,13:44   

Each time Larry posts the picture of him with Meyer, something about Meyer reminds me of another image:

   

--------------
"I, OTOH, am an underachiever...I either pee my pants or faint dead away..." FTK

"You could always wrap fresh fish in the paper you publish it on, though, and sell that." - Field Man on how to find value in Gary Gaulin's real-science "theory"

  
LarTanner



Posts: 36
Joined: Dec. 2015

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2017,15:31   

Quote (Jkrebs @ June 13 2017,11:03)
The whole thread has been pretty interesting. From the same person that gave us the fact that angels have no gender, StephenB tells us the following aspects of natural moral law, in case you needed to know and were worried about possible immoral behavior.

jdk: "Is oral sex immoral, … even limited to married couples?"

SB: "Most moral theologians say oral sex is moral only as foreplay and only if it is mutually acceptable, but it is not moral if brought to completion. That is because every sexual act, to be moral, must be open to the transmission of life upon completion. Some moral theologians say it is completely wrong regardless of context."

jdk: "Masturbation?"

SB: "Same conditions as above. Immoral as a completed act. Always wrong outside of marriage."

jdk: "Do those acts “self-evidently fulfill or conform our nature”, or not?"

SB: "The behavioral standards for the natural moral law are not always self evident. They are often the product of moral reflection and reasoned analysis. According to the natural moral law, the purpose of sex is to create a unitive bond of love between husband and wife and to procreate. The point is that the unitive function cannot be morally separated from the procreative function. Only on those conditions can the good of both spouses be preserved. Everything turns on purpose."

I laugh at "According to the natural moral law, the purpose of sex is to create a unitive bond of love between husband and wife and to procreate."

The conservative playbook would have us believe that only man-woman missionary position is "sex." Kind of like only man-woman matrimony is "marriage." Therefore, these other acts--being other than sex acts--should have different purposes in the natural moral law.

Perhaps StephenB will enlighten us as to the purposes of various intimate entanglements.  :p

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2017,19:29   

Quote (Tony M Nyphot @ June 13 2017,13:44)
Each time Larry posts the picture of him with Meyer, something about Meyer reminds me of another image:

   

I've always had a similar thought



--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."

- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

  
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2017,19:50   

I just keep seeing Jack McBrayer (Kenneth from 30 Rock).

btw what does the arbiter of all things sexual say about female orgasm?

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2017,20:37   

Quote (fnxtr @ June 13 2017,19:50)
I just keep seeing Jack McBrayer (Kenneth from 30 Rock).

btw what does the arbiter of all things sexual say about female orgasm?

A myth.

  
Bob O'H



Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2017,02:06   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ June 13 2017,20:37)
Quote (fnxtr @ June 13 2017,19:50)
I just keep seeing Jack McBrayer (Kenneth from 30 Rock).

btw what does the arbiter of all things sexual say about female orgasm?

A myth.

You mean this is about marriage, and only a myth will have an orgathm?

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
Bob O'H



Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2017,02:09   

I don't think Denyse has watched any of the Star Wars films. If she had (or at least seen IV & VI), she might not have asked Is evolutionary informatics a deathstar for Darwinism? Perhaps shes suggesting that Bob Marks is Darth Vader.

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2017,11:17   

Quote (LarTanner @ June 13 2017,13:31)
Perhaps StephenB will enlighten us as to the purposes of various intimate entanglements.  :p

Are you kidding?  StephenB appears to think of little else.  There will be illustrations.  Drawn from his extensive collection.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2017,13:51   

Pearls of wisdom from StephenB:
Quote
Most people don’t understand the fact that granting a right to one group automatically takes away a right from another group.

  
Jim_Wynne



Posts: 1208
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2017,13:52   

Quote (JohnW @ June 14 2017,11:17)
Quote (LarTanner @ June 13 2017,13:31)
Perhaps StephenB will enlighten us as to the purposes of various intimate entanglements.  :p

Are you kidding?  StephenB appears to think of little else.  There will be illustrations.  Drawn from his extensive collection.

I wonder if he wears glasses.

--------------
Evolution is not about laws but about randomness on happanchance.--Robert Byers, at PT

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2017,18:02   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ June 14 2017,13:51)
Pearls of wisdom from StephenB:
     
Quote
Most people don’t understand the fact that granting a right to one group automatically takes away a right from another group.

Law of Conservation of Civil Rights.   ???

We'll put that next to Dembski's "Law of Conservation of Information" brain fart.

ETA: Can someone who is socked up ask StephenB which group lost rights when interracial couples gained the right to marry?

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."

- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2017,18:30   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 14 2017,18:02)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ June 14 2017,13:51)
Pearls of wisdom from StephenB:
     
Quote
Most people don’t understand the fact that granting a right to one group automatically takes away a right from another group.

Law of Conservation of Civil Rights.   ???

We'll put that next to Dembski's "Law of Conservation of Information" brain fart.

ETA: Can someone who is socked up ask StephenB which group lost rights when interracial couples gained the right to marry?

The intolerant knuckle dragging bigots lost the right to keep interracial couples apart.

  
Jkrebs



Posts: 590
Joined: Sep. 2004

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2017,22:48   

To occam: bigots lost the right to not have to deal with, or even see, inter-racial couples, and thus not have their religious sensibilities violated. Thus speaketh Stephen.

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 15 2017,00:13   

Denyse raises the weird level:    
Quote
10 News June 14, 2017 at 3:22 pm

Orloog, watch out. I have read the book. Have you?

And then doubles down:  
Quote
11 News June 14, 2017 at 3:24 pm

Has Bob O’H read the book? As opposed to making crude remarks like “Perhaps coming up with analogies is Denyse’s exhaust port.”

Yeah Bob, have you read the book yet or are you too busy thinking crude thoughts about Denyse's exhaust port?

More on exhaust ports here.

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 15 2017,01:43   

Currently the latest comment on the FFS: Gender as a social construct... thread:
     
Quote
172
StephenB  June 15, 2017 at 12:03 am

Pindi

     
Quote
   StephenB, if you were asked to a dinner party, and the host spent hours preparing a meal that tasted horrible to you, would you tell them them the truth if they asked you at the dinner table whether you enjoyed the meal? Would you say – “actually no, it was horrible”? Or would you spare their feelings and embarrassment?


I would have stopped eating after the first bite. If, after noticing my full plate, they were imprudent enough to ask me in public how I liked the meal, I would say something like this: “I am not eating tonight because something happened earlier in the evening that spoiled my appetite.” (I would not say that the something was the first bite). Privately, however, I would tell them the truth so that they could correct the problem, keep their friends, and invite them back. In other words, I would first veil the truth and then tell the truth. People who have dinner parties should definitely know how to cook.

Somehow, I don't think StephenB gets invited out to social occasions for a second time too often.

UD link (scroll to comment 172 if the link breaks)

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
Bob O'H



Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 15 2017,03:26   

Quote (CeilingCat @ June 15 2017,00:13)
Denyse raises the weird level:      
Quote
10 News June 14, 2017 at 3:22 pm

Orloog, watch out. I have read the book. Have you?

And then doubles down:    
Quote
11 News June 14, 2017 at 3:24 pm

Has Bob O’H read the book? As opposed to making crude remarks like “Perhaps coming up with analogies is Denyse’s exhaust port.”

Yeah Bob, have you read the book yet or are you too busy thinking crude thoughts about Denyse's exhaust port?

More on exhaust ports here.

I read the abridged version - it only took me 5 parsecs to get through it.

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
CeilingCat



Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 16 2017,02:45   

Quote (Bob O'H @ June 15 2017,03:26)
 
Quote (CeilingCat @ June 15 2017,00:13)
Denyse raises the weird level:          
Quote
10 News June 14, 2017 at 3:22 pm

Orloog, watch out. I have read the book. Have you?

And then doubles down:        
Quote
11 News June 14, 2017 at 3:24 pm

Has Bob O’H read the book? As opposed to making crude remarks like “Perhaps coming up with analogies is Denyse’s exhaust port.”

Yeah Bob, have you read the book yet or are you too busy thinking crude thoughts about Denyse's exhaust port?

More on exhaust ports here.

I read the abridged version - it only took me 5 parsecs to get through it.

That's a new record for the Kessel run.  The previous record was twelve, set by Han Solo.  Of course, those were Metric parsecs.

  
Bob O'H



Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 16 2017,03:40   

Quote (CeilingCat @ June 16 2017,02:45)
Quote (Bob O'H @ June 15 2017,03:26)
   
Quote (CeilingCat @ June 15 2017,00:13)
Denyse raises the weird level:          
Quote
10 News June 14, 2017 at 3:22 pm

Orloog, watch out. I have read the book. Have you?

And then doubles down:        
Quote
11 News June 14, 2017 at 3:24 pm

Has Bob O’H read the book? As opposed to making crude remarks like “Perhaps coming up with analogies is Denyse’s exhaust port.”

Yeah Bob, have you read the book yet or are you too busy thinking crude thoughts about Denyse's exhaust port?

More on exhaust ports here.

I read the abridged version - it only took me 5 parsecs to get through it.

That's a new record for the Kessel run.  The previous record was twelve, set by Han Solo.  Of course, those were Metric parsecs.

That's why the Empire was so successful. Imperial units lets it move its armies around more shortly.

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 16 2017,08:28   

Quote (Bob O'H @ June 16 2017,11:40)
Quote (CeilingCat @ June 16 2017,02:45)
Quote (Bob O'H @ June 15 2017,03:26)
   
Quote (CeilingCat @ June 15 2017,00:13)
Denyse raises the weird level:            
Quote
10 News June 14, 2017 at 3:22 pm

Orloog, watch out. I have read the book. Have you?

And then doubles down:          
Quote
11 News June 14, 2017 at 3:24 pm

Has Bob O’H read the book? As opposed to making crude remarks like “Perhaps coming up with analogies is Denyse’s exhaust port.”

Yeah Bob, have you read the book yet or are you too busy thinking crude thoughts about Denyse's exhaust port?

More on exhaust ports here.

I read the abridged version - it only took me 5 parsecs to get through it.

That's a new record for the Kessel run.  The previous record was twelve, set by Han Solo.  Of course, those were Metric parsecs.

That's why the Empire was so successful. Imperial units lets it move its armies around more shortly.

Yeah but if you get a rougue conversion you can smash right into a planet.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: June 16 2017,09:29   

Quote (k.e.. @ June 16 2017,08:28)
Quote (Bob O'H @ June 16 2017,11:40)
Quote (CeilingCat @ June 16 2017,02:45)
 
Quote (Bob O'H @ June 15 2017,03:26)
     
Quote (CeilingCat @ June 15 2017,00:13)
Denyse raises the weird level:            
Quote
10 News June 14, 2017 at 3:22 pm

Orloog, watch out. I have read the book. Have you?

And then doubles down:          
Quote
11 News June 14, 2017 at 3:24 pm

Has Bob O’H read the book? As opposed to making crude remarks like “Perhaps coming up with analogies is Denyse’s exhaust port.”

Yeah Bob, have you read the book yet or are you too busy thinking crude thoughts about Denyse's exhaust port?

More on exhaust ports here.

I read the abridged version - it only took me 5 parsecs to get through it.

That's a new record for the Kessel run.  The previous record was twelve, set by Han Solo.  Of course, those were Metric parsecs.

That's why the Empire was so successful. Imperial units lets it move its armies around more shortly.

Yeah but if you get a rougue conversion you can smash right into a planet.

May the farce be with you.

  
  15792 replies since Dec. 29 2013,11:01 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (527) < ... 275 276 277 278 279 [280] 281 282 283 284 285 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]